Obama cites Georgia as proof that pre-k works. Calls for College Scorecard and redesigned high schools. Real goals or rhetoric?

President Obama praised Georgia for its pre-k program in his speech. (AJC)

President Obama praised Georgia for its pre-k program in his speech. (AJC)

In his fifth State of the Union address, a buoyed President Obama called for making “high-quality preschool available to every child in America. Every dollar we invest in high-quality early education can save more than seven dollars later on – by boosting graduation rates, reducing teen pregnancy, even reducing violent crime.”

Citing Georgia as an example, the President said states that have treated early childhood as a priority have children who “grow up more likely to read and do math at grade level, graduate high school, hold a job, and form more stable families of their own.  So let’s do what works, and make sure none of our children start the race of life already behind.”

He called proposed cuts to education and job training a terrible idea, saying, “Most Americans, Democrats, Republicans and independents, understand that we can’t just cut our way to prosperity.” While saying that Washington should not make promises it can’t keep, he added, “We must keep promises we already made.”

“After all, why would we choose to make deeper cuts to education and Medicare just to protect special interest tax breaks?

Obama focused on the need to train Americans for jobs and promoted the role of education in improving personal fortunes and those of the nation.

He outlined a national push to educate children earlier.

“Study after study shows that the sooner a child begins learning, the better he or she does down the road.  But today, fewer than three in ten 4-year-olds are enrolled in a high-quality preschool program. Most middle-class parents can’t afford a few hundred bucks a week for private preschool.  And for poor kids who need help the most, this lack of access to preschool education can shadow them for the rest of their lives.

Tonight, I propose working with states to make high-quality preschool available to every child in America.  Every dollar we invest in high-quality early education can save more than seven dollars later on – by boosting graduation rates, reducing teen pregnancy, even reducing violent crime.

In states that make it a priority to educate our youngest children, like Georgia or Oklahoma, studies show students grow up more likely to read and do math at grade level, graduate high school, hold a job, and form more stable families of their own.  So let’s do what works, and make sure none of our children start the race of life already behind.  Let’s give our kids that chance.

Let’s also make sure that a high school diploma puts our kids on a path to a good job.  Right now, countries like Germany focus on graduating their high school students with the equivalent of a technical degree from one of our community colleges, so that they’re ready for a job.  At schools like P-Tech in Brooklyn, a collaboration between New York Public Schools, the City University of New York, and IBM, students will graduate with a high school diploma and an associate degree in computers or engineering.

We need to give every American student opportunities like this.  Four years ago, we started Race to the Top – a competition that convinced almost every state to develop smarter curricula and higher standards, for about 1 percent of what we spend on education each year.

Tonight, I’m announcing a new challenge to redesign America’s high schools so they better equip graduates for the demands of a high-tech economy.  We’ll reward schools that develop new partnerships with colleges and employers, and create classes that focus on science, technology, engineering, and math – the skills today’s employers are looking for to fill jobs right now and in the future.

Now, even with better high schools, most young people will need some higher education.  It’s a simple fact: the more education you have, the more likely you are to have a job and work your way into the middle class.  But today, skyrocketing costs price way too many young people out of a higher education, or saddle them with unsustainable debt.

Through tax credits, grants, and better loans, we have made college more affordable for millions of students and families over the last few years.  But taxpayers cannot continue to subsidize the soaring cost of higher education. Colleges must do their part to keep costs down, and it’s our job to make sure they do.  Tonight, I ask Congress to change the Higher Education Act, so that affordability and value are included in determining which colleges receive certain types of federal aid.

And tomorrow, my Administration will release a new “College Scorecard” that parents and students can use to compare schools based on a simple criteria: where you can get the most bang for your educational buck.

To grow our middle class, our citizens must have access to the education and training that today’s jobs require.  But we also have to make sure that America remains a place where everyone who’s willing to work hard has the chance to get ahead.

The audience featured the faces of gun tragedies, including the parents of a high school student gunned down walking home from school.

Hadiya Pendleton’s parents sat with First Lady Michelle Obama. Hadiya, 15, was killed in a park walking home from her Chicago high school. The 15-year-old student and majorette had just performed a few days earlier at the Obama inauguration with her high school band. On Monday, two suspects were charged in her death.

Seated next to Jill Biden was Kaitlin Roig, the Newtown first grade teacher who hid her students in the bathroom to save them from Adam Lanza’s rampage, which killed 20 children and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

Gabby Giffords, the Arizona congresswoman seriously injured in 201 by a gunman at a supermarket appearance, was also in the audience for Obama’s speech.

On gun violence in schools and in the country, Obama made his most emotional appeals of the evening:

It has been two months since Newtown. I know this is not the first time this country has debated how to reduce gun violence.

But this time is different.

Overwhelming majorities of Americans – Americans who believe in the Second Amendment – have come together around commonsense reform – like background checks that will make it harder for criminals to get their hands on a gun.  Senators of both parties are working together on tough new laws to prevent anyone from buying guns for resale to criminals.  Police chiefs are asking our help to get weapons of war and massive ammunition magazines off our streets, because these police chiefs are tired of seeing their guys and gals being outgunned.

Each of these proposals deserves a vote in Congress.  If you want to vote no, that’s your choice. But these proposals deserve a vote. Because in the two months since Newtown, more than a thousand birthdays, graduations, and anniversaries have been stolen from our lives by a bullet from a gun. More than a thousand.

One of those we lost was a young girl named Hadiya Pendleton.  She was 15 years old.  She loved Fig Newtons and lip gloss.  She was a majorette. She was so good to her friends, they all thought they were her best friend.  Just three weeks ago, she was here, in Washington, with her classmates, performing for her country at my inauguration. And a week later, she was shot and killed in a Chicago park after school, just a mile away from my house.

Hadiya’s parents, Nate and Cleo, are in this chamber tonight, along with more than two dozen Americans whose lives have been torn apart by gun violence.  They deserve a vote. They deserve a vote. They deserve a vote.

Gabby Giffords deserves a vote.

The families of Newtown deserve a vote.

The families of Aurora deserve a vote.

The families of Oak Creek, and Tucson, and Blacksburg, and the countless other communities ripped open by gun violence – they deserve a simple vote.

Our actions will not prevent every senseless act of violence in this country.  Indeed, no laws, no initiatives, no administrative acts will perfectly solve all the challenges I’ve outlined tonight.  But we were never sent here to be perfect.  We were sent here to make what difference we can, to secure this nation, expand opportunity, and uphold our ideals through the hard, often frustrating, but absolutely necessary work of self-government.

We were sent here to look out for our fellow Americans the same way they look out for one another, every single day, usually without fanfare, all across this country.  We should follow their example.

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

66 comments Add your comment

nanny state

February 13th, 2013
10:27 am

I am glad that I never had to endure day care or pre k or full day kindergarten and had a childhood. I attribute this to my love of learning today instead of a disdain for being in school from cradle to grave.

Drudge

February 13th, 2013
10:38 am

AKA government funded daycare. I think there is merit however, what would also help is educating parents on how to support their child’s education. I read somewhere that pre-k kids usually normalize to class level pretty early on, negating those early gains. Parent’s have to help their kids take advantage of that head start continually or it is all for naught.

All in all, this is a nice approach, but we have a lot bigger problems with our ed system than finger painting a year earlier.

A Pre-Service Teacher

February 13th, 2013
10:43 am

Obama should have read an article published here on Monday before using Georgia as a reference for high performance in math. I thought this was somewhat ironic.
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/georgia-students-struggle-on-test-tied-to-common-c/nWLbm/

A Pre-Service Teacher

February 13th, 2013
10:48 am

Also, for the record, I never went to pre-K and outperformed a number of my peers. Scored a 32 on the ACT and received academic scholarships to pay for college. Why? A blend of good teachers and the fact that my parents always made education a priority at home. Pumping money into a broken system won’t necessarily fix all of our problems. There must be other adjustments made.

DS

February 13th, 2013
10:59 am

Some of these comments about Pre-K being government-funded daycare are misinformed. Pre-K kids don’t do calculus and conjugate Latin verbs all day long, but they don’t just finger paint either.

Pre-K programs provide a blend of socialization, early learning skills like writing and counting, using a computer, and creative play. These programs help kids learn how to behave in group settings, mind the teacher and concentrate on lessons — skills that help them hit the ground running in Kindergarten and first grade.

Teacher MS ELA

February 13th, 2013
11:14 am

HS Math Teacher,

The whole point of pre-k and early education is to get kids the tools they need so that they can be successful throughout their education. Many of our countries children need to get caught up to their peers that are offered a leg up at home or whose parents have enough money to fund a private pre-k education. Students don’t suddenly start having academic difficulty in middle school, it starts at the beginning when they walk into the classroom for the first time.

I agree, funding for our existing public education needs to be improved. However, we need to think of the redistribution of funds throughout the national budget.

Nuetering

February 13th, 2013
11:16 am

“So let’s do what works, and make sure none of our children start the race of life already behind”

Free schools. Free meals at schools. Free daycare after schools. Then at 5 o’clock, the breeders have to actually parent. Which is where Obama’s plan falls apart.

Fools will be fools, regardless of the billions governments spend.

Obama

February 13th, 2013
11:19 am

@DS
“These programs help kids learn how to behave in group settings, mind the teacher and concentrate on lessons — skills that help them hit the ground running in Kindergarten and first grade”

Things that should be taught at home. But the man than made the deposit into the breeder is no where to be found. So 19 year old ‘momma’ has to go scratch an itch, so she hands babies off to 40 year old ‘grand momma’ who has no help or job. So kids run around with no supervision and no instruction. Obama’s world.

AtlSteve

February 13th, 2013
12:21 pm

I didn’t watch it. Did Obama bless out the Supreme Court again, or did he learn from his recent lesson with Dr Ben Carson?

Brasstown

February 13th, 2013
12:43 pm

We really should be paying for Pre K programs in India and China so that it will encourage more profits for American corporations that have out-sourced jobs to those countries. Those profits can then trickle down in the American economy in the form of jobs. I mean good, honest jobs like shoe-shining and bathroom attendants.

high school teacher

February 13th, 2013
12:58 pm

First, I am on my lunch break.

Secondly, with the acerbic grammar corrections on this blog alone, I would think that the work force also wants students who are literate. However, Mr. Obama left English off the list:”We’ll reward schools that develop new partnerships with colleges and employers, and create classes that focus on science, technology, engineering, and math – the skills today’s employers are looking for to fill jobs right now and in the future.”

Finally, we really must go back to diploma programs in high school. Pretending that all students need the same skills is getting us nowhere fast. Placing all students in college prep [sic] English really serves no one well.

bu2

February 13th, 2013
2:03 pm

@HST
I agree that one size does not fit all. I don’t think we need different categories of HS diplomas, but we don’t need every student to take Calculus either. Not everyone is cut out for a STEM job. And we need to have classes with students who learn at similar speeds instead of boring the quick ones and leaving the slower ones behind. While some places do that, others are very opposed to tracking.

We need to allow students the flexibility to follow what interests them in HS.

RC

February 14th, 2013
2:18 pm

PrezBO jets to town, ties up traffic, visits a school that is closed and talks about a subject he knows nothing about.
Arrogance at it’s best. What a jerk.

Ole Guy

February 14th, 2013
3:30 pm

If I could only have achieved whatever modest accomplishments I have managed to scrape up through “speechifying” (is that why folks used to call me the BS artist?), I would probably be living on Pennsylvania Ave myself (quite frankly, they couldn’t pay me enough, but that’s an entirely different story).

Despite our Prez’s confidence in the effectiveness of pre-k, I stand skeptical as to the real long-term value behind this program. If someone can show, through real studies, the academic trackrecords of kids from pre-k to college graduation, and compare these findings to a grouping of kids without benefit of pre-k, we can see, in no uncertain terms, the REAL value of this program. Thus far, it is simply viewed as a pie-in-the-sky answer to the dismal graduation rates thus far realized.

Perhaps this would be an excellent project for someone like the prof to undertake.

So far, all the fanfare over pre-k seems to be based solely on faith and wishful thinking…fine when one is in church praying for rain, but not at all in keeping with the WISE management of educational resources.

What ever

February 14th, 2013
7:36 pm

White folks, please get over the fact that this man is your president. Georgia has always rated in the bottom when it comes to education and I’m sure always will. Mind you, this has nothing to do with Obama but can we all say Bush, No Child Left Behind. That would be to much like right huh.

[...] to subsidize the soaring cost of higher education. … Read more from the original source: accountability,children,education,georgia,obama and guns,obama … ← The Economic Importance of Higher Education | Jones & Bartlett [...]