National School Choice week: 49 million students still without options

Here is an op-ed column by Robert Enlow, the president and CEO of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, the legacy foundation of Nobel laureate Milton Friedman and his wife Rose. His piece highlights National School Choice week, which kicks off on Sunday, Jan 27.

Enlow addresses the growing choice landscape, including Georgia’s private school tax credit.

By Robert Enlow

Heidi and Frank Green used to worry about their daughters while they were at school. The Clarksville, Indiana couple was concerned about bullying, cursing, large class sizes, a revolving teaching staff, and a general lack of attention for students.

Thankfully, the Greens say their lives have changed for the better as daughters Gillian and Emma are now eager to attend school. Today they are getting quality instruction at their new Catholic school thanks to a voucher program adopted in Indiana two years ago.

“School choice should be everywhere,” said Mrs. Green. “Parents should be able to decide what’s best for their kids.

Gillian and Emma are among the 255,000 students nationwide who attend a private school of their family’s choice using vouchers or tax-credit scholarships. Another 2 million students utilize public charter schools as their preferred option.

But there are still more than 49 million public school students throughout the country who do not have such freedom. They must attend their neighborhood public school regardless of its safety, quality, class sizes, teaching staff, or other issues outside their parents’ control. But such restriction doesn’t have to be the case.

Sunday will mark the beginning of the third annual National School Choice Week, which runs through Feb. 2. There will be 3,000 events across 50 states including rallies and forums where parents will ask lawmakers for more choices for their kids.

National School Choice Week highlights the private, charter, online and home school education options available to families and those stuck with a school assigned to them by their address. Parents can choose public or private colleges for their children using many federal and state aid programs. They should be able to do the same with K-12 schools.

After major school choice victories last fall in which Washington voters agreed to allow charter schools to open in the state and Georgia voters agreed to an easier path to create more charters, a host of other states will consider additional school choice measures in 2013. Among the highlights:

· Georgia lawmakers will consider expanding a tuition tax credit program that allows tax credits for donations to scholarship organizations who offer scholarships to students to attend private schools.

· Tennessee’s governor will include a school voucher program in his legislative package.

· The Texas legislature will consider a program in which taxpayers would receive tax credits for donations they make to nonprofits that provide private school scholarships for low-income students.

· Mississippi’s governor proposed a private school choice program for students in underperforming public schools.

· North Carolina’s lawmakers will review proposals for opportunity scholarships and quite possibly education savings accounts, a new type of private school choice available only in Arizona.

· Alaska lawmakers will vote on a school voucher plan for all students statewide regardless of their family income.

· Indiana’s new governor has proposed expanding its voucher program to increase scholarship amounts and student eligibility.

· Maine lawmakers will hear a proposal from their governor to give children school vouchers.

Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman, the father of the school choice concept, believed that offering parents education options other than their neighborhood school would not only be good for children but would improve education. Studies show school choice is helping children in their new schools and those who didn’t participate – something vitally important when so many children don’t get a quality education.

The Center for Labor Market Studies at Northeastern University found that high school dropouts are more dependent on government assistance such as food stamps, housing assistance, and Medicaid. They are also more likely to be in jail or prison, another cost to federal, state, and local taxpayers. And unemployment rates are highest among dropouts, according to the study.

If our society is to address its burgeoning debt problem and give young people a chance to become successful, offering parents an opportunity to access high-quality schools is a path to prosperity for themselves, their children, and society.

In several states, policymakers are ensuring more students have access to the schools, public or private, that work best for them. National School Choice Week is the time to shine a spotlight on those leaders and anyone else working to make sure every family is free to choose in education.

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

56 comments Add your comment

xxx

January 22nd, 2013
10:22 am

Don’t give a damn about vouchers, I chose private schhol for my kids for a reason. I just want to get out funding inner city prisons against my will.

bigbill

January 22nd, 2013
11:53 am

Of course Mr. Enlow focuses on the Green family’s being confronted with only two choices: the Clarksville, Indiana public schools where, according to him, “bullying, cursing, large class sizes, a revolving teaching staff, and a general lack of attention for students” are the order of the day. Or the eminently preferable alternative: “quality instruction at their new Catholic school thanks to a voucher program adopted in Indiana two years ago.” This is how Mr. Enlow and the other proponents of privatizing traditional public schools like to describe “the growing choice landscape.” Public schools: bad! Private (including religious) schools: good! What nonsense. Especially the idea of taxpayer-funded religious schools.

Mr. Enlow offers no discussion about whether taxpayers’ funding schools which includes funding the teaching of religious doctrine is a good idea in the first place or whether it violates the First Amendment provision ensuring the separation of church and state. Does Mr. Enlow pick this example of Catholic schools as being appropriate, acceptable recipients of taxpayer-funded vouchers perhaps because religious doctrines and principles taught in Catholic schools are acceptable, mainstream, non-crontroversial? Are they? Where is all this going to end up?

A July 20, 2012 article from ThinkProgress gives us a clue: “Louisiana Republican Supports State Funds For Religious Schools As Long As They Are Not Islamic.” Here is Louisiana Republican State Representative Lindsey Hodges statement about why she voted for, then withdrew her support of a provision in Governor Bobbie Jindal’s overhaul of public education which allows state funds to be used to send students to religiously affiliated schools:

“I actually support (taxpayer) funding for teaching the fundamentals of America’s Founding Fathers’ religion, Christianity, in public schools or private schools…Unfortunately it will not be limited to the Founders’ religion. We need to be sure that it does not open the door to radical Islam schools. There are a thousand Muslim schools that have sprung up recently. I do not support using public for teaching Islam anywhere in Louisiana.”

http://thinkprogress.org/tag/school-vouchers/

The founding fathers most certainly were not all Christians. Whatever they were, they were surely very wise in drafting the First Amendment provision erecting a wall between government and religion, a wall which, in my opinion, Mr. Enlow and the other supporters of school vouchers for private schools are intent on breaching. If Catholics, Muslims and all the religions out there wish to maintain their religious schools, more power to them. But hey should pay for them. Our governments, federal, state, and local should not be using taxpayer funds to pay for them.

posterchild

January 23rd, 2013
12:03 am

@bigbill Look out, you’re actually making sense. That seems frowned upon around here…

Pride and Joy

January 23rd, 2013
5:09 am

Tony is full of baloney.
We DON’T have a choice where we send our kids to school because we DON’T have a choice where we live.
We LIVE where we can find work. We have to choose a place to live that is near enough to get to work and back.
Our JOB determines which state and to a great extent, which city we live in.
After our job determines the area in which we live, we look for the best school district we can afford to live in near our jobs…and THEN we buy the house.
Do you REALLY think that as much as I detest the GA education system that I actually CHOOSE to live here?
I HAVE to live here because it is where my JOB is.
Get it?
Yes, I still sacrifice to make the choices I do: I live a lower-class lifestyle to afford to send my kids to private school but I still have to EARN a solid, middle class salary in order to pay for the private school and live in a small, humble home and drive a ten year old car.
So…
NO….
We middle class and lower class families DO NOT have a choice as to where we live.

Amanda Brinks

January 24th, 2013
2:44 pm

Dr. Monica Henson — are you a charter school employee/adminstrator/teacher?
Have you heard of the new GLOBE ACADEMY in the Dekalb county system? It’s an immersion program charter school. Children are immersed in a second language for one half of the day.
Anyone heard of it?
It is supposed to be brand new. Anyone heard of it? Anyone heard of a program like it?
Any feedbacK?
Advice?

Dr. Monica Henson

January 25th, 2013
12:52 am

Hi Amanda. I am a charter school superintendent. I have heard of the school you reference because they were recently approved for a charter, but I honestly don’t know anything about it and can’t really offer any thoughts. You might check with the Georgia Charter Schools Association.

The school has a website and says it will open in August 2013. http://www.theglobeacademy.org/