Can the DeKalb school board reinvent itself in 30 days?

This is the digest form of the four-hour state Board of Education hearing today on whether or not to suspend the DeKalb Board of Education. If want all the details, scan my live blog from the hearing.

The DeKalb board is fighting for its survival after the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools placed the district on probation last month because of board mismanagement, meddling, nepotism and fiscal failings. The General Assembly passed a law in 2011 that gave the governor the legal power to remove errant school boards who jeopardize their district’s accreditation.

After the hearing during which every DeKalb board member testified, the state Board of Education delayed voting on recommending that the governor oust the fractious school board, instead approving a consent agreement and giving DeKalb time to show improvement.

But not as much time as the school board wanted.

It was clear some state board members were exasperated with the ongoing problems in DeKalb and doubtful that the nine DeKalb school board members had the ability to transcend their differences. But it was also clear that some state board members were reluctant to dissolve a local school board that includes three newly elected members who only took office 10 days ago.

At the start of the marathon hearing, lawyers for both the state Department of Education and the DeKalb school board urged the state board to sanction a consent agreement that would have allowed the board three months to initiate reforms recommended by SACS.

But the state board declined to grant DeKalb three months to right its ship. Instead, the state board approved a consent decree that gives DeKalb 30 days to register some progress rather than the April date sought by the county.

After approving the consent agreement, the state board immediately told the DeKalb board to return on Feb. 21 to report on its progress at which time the state board could choose to vote on suspension.

This gives DeKalb only 30 days to register some significant progress.

“If they’ve done a rock star job, we can give them to June,” said state board member Mike Royal. “Does that mean we have to vote to remove or not to remove in our recommendation to the governor. No, but April kicks this can too far down the road. This is a critical situation that is upon us now. It is not new and there are 98,000 children in DeKalb County depending on us now.”

However, the DeKalb board attorney maintained that 30 days is insufficient to produce change. ”We believe a two month or a two-and-a-half month process is fairer,” said DeKalb attorney Rocco Testani.

He asked state board members to consider what nine board members could realistically accomplish in 30 days.

Testani was assisted in making his case by the DOE attorney Jennifer Hackemeyer who warned that DeKalb citizens may be confused if the state board signs a consent order giving the DeKalb board three months to make progress but then turns around and brings them back in 30 days and vote on their fates.

Hackemeyer reminded the state board about what they were facing with Sumter County. (The Sumter board filed a civil lawsuit in November against the State Board of Education and Gov. Nathan Deal.)

In defending his board, DeKalb Chair Eugene Walker told the state, “We have had a number of rumors that confounded our ability to govern. People would rather listen to the rumors than look at the records. I admit at times we can be cantankerous but we have honest and decent people on that board. We don’t have people taking money.”

State board member Wanda Barrs raised thoughtful points on what actions will produce the best outcome for DeKalb. Is it ousting the entire board, including three newly elected members, in a month’s time? Or is it working with the board through better guidance and monitoring over three months?

Note that the Clayton school board was ousted and replaced by Gov. Sonny Perdue, but the problems in the district persist, just with a new cast of characters.

In addition, there may be a legal question to whether the state can oust brand new board members who were not in office when SACS placed the system on probation.

There were several comments today at the hearing about the absence of DeKalb Superintendent Cheryl Atkinson, who had a family medical emergency. But it was not just her physical absence that was commented upon; state board member Wanda Barrs pressed DeKalb school board member Pam Speaks on whether Atkinson had the “capacity” to help the board.

“I don’t think it is the superintendent’s role to fix our responsibilities as a board,” responded Speaks. “I do think the superintendent has the capacity to work  in conjunction, in collaboration, with the present Board of Education to allow the board  to carry out their role and responsibilities as well as for her to carry out her roles and responsibilities.”

A refrain by many DeKalb board members was that they did not knowingly violate any policies. Several expressed puzzlement over some of the SACS criticisms. All the veteran board members said that they did undergo the required board training, and believed their actions fell within the confines of their board duties and responsibilities.

That line of defense — we didn’t know what we were doing was wrong — did not go over well with some state board members.

State board member Brian K. Burdette wants a list of the training that every DeKalb school board member has undertaken,  telling them: “Everyone says they had the training. If they had it, it didn’t work. If it had, we wouldn’t be here. As a board  member, you are supposed to know what you can and cannot do. If you don’t know, it is up to you to find out and police yourselves. It is incumbent on you all. It is not incumbent on SACS. It isn’t incumbent on this board. It is incumbent on you to fix it. ”

–from Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

199 comments Add your comment

red herring

January 17th, 2013
8:44 pm

every school board, supt., principal, all county school administration and their office staff should be reviewed and downsized to a point where their county taxpayers can afford them. their salaries are in line with that of our governor and in some cases with that of the president of the usa. it is outrageous what we pay these people and their staffs as well as what we pay them in perks—cars/homes/credit cards/etc. the average citizen/taxpayer can’t afford this —nor do they themselves get any such gravy trains including retirements and healthcare. colledge/school/state govt/etc employees should not receive much better benefits and retirement than the taxpayers. it just should not happen.

Wilbur

January 17th, 2013
8:48 pm

The way your question is phrased it makes the board the most important thing. As though if the answer is that that the board cannot change in 30 days, we should allow them longer. Let me suggest that if the board does not change in 30 days that the governor should dissolve the board in the best interests of the children of the county. In the end, the fate of the squabbling, petty, venial mini-politicans that sit on school board does not matter very much at all.
Might your question be better phrased, “Can the children of the county wait longer than a month for the pseudo-adults on the board to clean up their act?”

mountain man

January 17th, 2013
8:54 pm

They could start by firing their Superintendent Atkinson.

Say it again!

January 17th, 2013
8:59 pm

Amen, Mountain Man!!!

sam123

January 17th, 2013
9:04 pm

No, they can not reinvent themselves in thirty days and they don’t even know where to start. When certain board members came forward they portrayed how incompetent they were. I think that is when the state board said that they could not wait until April 30th to make a decision….these people need to go. It is too bad that the new members and some competent board members could be included in the dismissal of the board. I agree with Walker. They are on there way out.

sam123

January 17th, 2013
9:05 pm

They are their way out.

DunMoody

January 17th, 2013
9:05 pm

Teacher Reader

January 17th, 2013
9:09 pm

Atkinson, Ramona, the plagiarist, any secretary making more than a teacher half way through their career, every person Atkinson brought on, every person who already had the job that Atkinson’s people replaced, and so on all need to be let go, and let them know now that their contracts will not be renewed, but Atkinson and the plagiarist need to go NOW!!!

If the board doesn’t do this, than they need to go as well in February. Our kids need to be thought of first.

Also by firing all of these people, the board could afford to pay and keep our greatest assets, our teachers and teacher aides much better. It would really change the morale in the schools, which is just pitiful right now.

Blue Ed

January 17th, 2013
9:20 pm

I second that with an emphatic “No!”

The Dekalb County School District is corrupt across so many dimensions. From the Board to schoolhouse administration a culture of corruption has thrived. The students and the teachers are the victims.

No one, not the local Board, not the State Board, not the Governor, not the neanderthal State Legislature, knows what teachers endure day to day in the Dekalb meatgrinder to achieve an elusive “Victory (snicker) in the Classroom.” And to pay this hot shot attorney to represent the Dekalb Board before the State Board (and other hot shot attorneys to sanction their dirty work), teachers have their lost pay, their future retirement income, and their commitment to a noble calling.

If Deal doesn’t do it, karma will.

GETtheCELLoutATL

January 17th, 2013
9:22 pm

Teacher Reader, I don’t think the board can fire anyone other than the Superintendent. They just bought her a new vehicle. They should have fired Interim Superintendent Ramona Tyson when they learned about the financial errors and staff members not implementing budgets. Instead, they gave her a raise. When the previous Superintendent Crawford Lewis was indicted on charges of running a criminal enterprise, they should have fired him. Instead, they kept him as their leader and only after public pressure did he step down voluntarily to answer the charges and personally put Tyson into the Interim Super. role. Instead of firing him, they gave him a raise and we are still footing his legal defense (out of the general fund which is supposed to be used to pay teachers and buy books) as well as paying for his prosecution (by the county DA’s office).

I wish someone on the state BOE would ask for clarification from SACS about what exactly the “proper channels” are. And someone should tell the board members and the Superintendent that they don’t sound like heroes by announcing plans to go wireless. Most other school systems that have done this have determined it was a bad idea and have had to spend a great deal to convert back to secure, wired connections.

Taxpayer and Teacher

January 17th, 2013
9:23 pm

We and I do mean we are NOT SIGNING CONTRACTS for this animal circus of idiots. They are going to be shocked at how many people give those contracts right back to them. Who wants to stay around and not know if the school district is going to remain accredited? Besides, if you work in a district that has lost its accredidation your time does NOT go toward your retirement. So you are underpaid and no retirment credits…Really? And rumor has it that we will be getting another pay cut next year to make up the deficit. So, I guess that means that the teachers are going to have to pay for the missing book money…Please, these people are CRAZY!!!!!!

Student Advocate

January 17th, 2013
9:24 pm

“Note that the Clayton school board was ousted and replaced by Gov. Sonny Perdue, but the problems in the district persist, just with a new cast of characters.”

If the palace isn’t purged, nothing changes. Morale stinks. This week its the plagiarist. Its a new verse to the same song, every week or so. You do the right thing by the kids, and what do you get? A muzzle, a dozen more kids in your room, and more useless educrat paperwork. Someone else gets the raise. (or free doctorate.) Teachers are fleeing…wait to see how many do not sign their contracts.

GETtheCELLoutATL

January 17th, 2013
9:25 pm

MominDunwoody

January 17th, 2013
9:39 pm

It is unconscionable that the State BOE has given the DeKalb BOE another thirty days. To do what exactly? The clock is ticking. It is immaterial whether or not we think that AdvancED is the be all and end all. It is the agency that the state has chosen to accredit our schools. DeKalb County School System is on probation, and if things continue as they are, the school will lose accreditation in 11 months.

At that point, it won’t matter how great the teachers are, or how dedicated the principals are, or how many AP classes our students take, or how they perform on standardized tests. All that will matter is that they attend in an unaccredited and disgraced school district.

The items enumerated in the AdvancED report are only the tip of the iceberg with what is wrong with DCSS. Why just today it was reported in the AJC that our esteemed superintendent has pronounced that a proven plagiarist will not lose his $117K job. Still, no one knows where $12 million went that was supposed to buy textbooks. Graduation rates are abysmal. Redistricting plans are an absolute mess….

Is DCSS too big to fail? Is Governor Deal and the state BOE willing to take a chance by sticking with this dysfunctional group that has had a hand in driving this district into the ground? Shame on them!

The Deal

January 17th, 2013
9:46 pm

I hope they can’t reinvent themselves. They don’t have the skill to do what really needs to be done. They are like plumbers trying to do brain surgery or a cable technician trying to be a dentist.

The only thing they have time to do is work all of the angles of their political connections and try to use influence to change enough minds on that state board.

There is no way that the people who created this mess can get us out of it. Three members does not a new board make. It doesn’t even really change the historical voting pattern.

Inman Parker

January 17th, 2013
9:52 pm

What an utter disgrace.

Teacher Reader

January 17th, 2013
10:16 pm

Get the Cell Out, I understand that the board can’t remove anyone other than the superintendent, but the rest of the motley crew need to go. If just the board goes, and the palace isn’t cleared as well, than nothing will change, as much that is wrong with the board is also happening in the palace and has for sometime.

I don’t blame teachers for not signing contracts. That really needs to happen, so that tax payers, board members, and people in charge of education at the state level understand how big of a problem we really have here.

We can’t expect the kids to care about their education, when the adults running the show show them time and time again that they don’t care about them.

N. GA Teacher

January 17th, 2013
10:20 pm

It sounds like DeKalb has too many board members (and their appointed senior admins) with personal political agendas and gains as the primary goal instead of educating the children. The first priority, especially in a high-povery district, is to devote the lion’s share of resources to the front lines of education, which means decrease class sizes, increase the number of adults in the classroom (paprapros, parent volunteers, coteachers) , and use administrators to support discipline and order, not intimidate or harass teachers. The funds to maximize adults in the classrooms can come from elimination of unnecessary central office personnel, reduction of senior administrative salaries, and other cost-cutting measures.

concerned parent

January 17th, 2013
10:23 pm

@getthecelloutatl… You sound very un-informed in your statements. To say that the district shouldn’t go wireless is the most ridiculous thing I think Ive heard on here in a while. You can’t be serious. Name me one district that has a regret of moving to a wireless platform? Your either to old to know what wireless is or means or your just ignorant and really don’t know better. AMAZING!!!

concerned parent

January 17th, 2013
10:27 pm

@getthecelloutatl… You sound very un-informed in your statements. You can’t be serious. Name one district that has a regret of moving to a wireless platform? Your either to old to know what wireless is or means or your just ignorant and really don’t know better. AMAZING!!! To say that the district shouldn’t go wireless is the most ridiculous thing Ive heard in a while on here. Stop embarrassing yourself on here and please vet what you say.

LOGIC

January 17th, 2013
10:39 pm

Having been at the hearing today and having twangs of sympathy for these representatives who have become part of my weekly soap opera, I really had to remind myself that we were there for the children. God Bless, Dr. Walker who held his own and made some good points, but each board member fell sadly short of inspiring any of us that they know how to lead or can actually be taught. Again, I was sad to see Ms. Wood have to answer so many questions. We know she has been reelected because she does love the children and speaks from the heart when it comes to taking care of her district’s children. Sadly, she did not present herself as knowledgeable or capable to help drive such drastic change. Mr. Cunningham made valid points about all the distractions the Board deals with – RICO indictment of CLew, Heery-Mitchell, superintendent searches, etc. HOWEVER- they have been dealing with these issues for years and have not shown proof of reaching out to their chain of command to be proactive. They collectively helped drive the district into the ground because they were being reactive and not proactive as everything crumbled around them.

Ms. Speaks stayed above so much of this but that makes her guilty too because she has been there so long. Ms. Jester was just a random experience. Her dissertation did little to show that she was capable of collaborating and her praise of Atkinson day after the big plagiarism story was strange.

The newbies had little to offer.

I hope that the State BOE gets details from SACS on details. I hope they ask for each member to disclose each and every relative in the system, review all the votes and call for interviews from the PTA Councils who have seen the indiscretions first hand. When monies raised help pay for toilet paper and hand sanitizer, there is a problem.

Can you imagine what we could have if another 10-20% of our tax dollars went to the teachers and the students? We may bring our teachers back to what they were making 5 yrs ago – adjusted for inflation and new payroll and social security taxes.

I look to learn from history and Clayton scares me and I do not take the Governor’s ability to unseat or suspend this board lightly. I do think that DeKalb is capable of finding interim members to help draft the policies needed to get the school system back on track. We believe in local control, our schools and our teachers, but we are tired of waste and the fact that our children are bearing the brunt of the mismanagement and lack of children. As Ms. Barrs confirmed with each member, all of the longer-term members have completed training for the last two years at least. Thinking that we can have these folks stay on and drive success is pretty far-fetched.

I would ask the State BOE how much are they and the state willing to sacrifice when DeKalb is home to the CDC and Emory. This embarrassment has gone on too long and a chain of command needs to be established to help systems as large as DeKalb not to get to this point. If they sacrifice our children, public education will die a precipitous death in metro Altanta.

Private Citizen

January 17th, 2013
10:40 pm

boardsown

January 17th, 2013
10:51 pm

the dekalb board–beyond hope—totally corrupt to the core. the entire board’s looking out for themselves, hoping to cash in big with deals and favors with all that taxpayer money—classic atl government. It just never changes in this crooked city.

Sandy Springs Parent

January 17th, 2013
11:07 pm

Very few people who work at at the CDC or Emory with School age children live in Dekalb County anymore. Those that do, have moved up to the Lakeside High School District. The older employees live within 5 minutes and recall the glory days when they all sent their kids to the crown jewel of North Druid Hills High School.

masr

January 17th, 2013
11:48 pm

No, they can not reinvent themselves (over night become competent; wise; honest/ethical; mature; committed to excellence; desire to improve all of DCSS and not just serve their favored minions; exhibit expertise, knowledge, ability and a desire to fix problems, find solutions, and don’t fix blame; demonstrate that they are more concerned about the good of the community/students and NOT their own power, prestige, outer apparel and flashy automobile)
The problems in DCSS have to do with more with lack of integrity, character and ingrained morality on the part of leaders (and the electorate) than anything else.
DCSS can not be fixed.

frankie

January 18th, 2013
2:10 am

NO IT CAN’T…..It has had 2years since the Atlanta School Board SACS issue, in those 2 years it has done NOTHING substantial and for that the entire groups shoul step down, and give our children a chance to graduate from highschool without worrying about accreditation.
They are ruining other peoples livesb ecause of their indiscressions and false pride….

STEP DOWN ……GIVE MY CHILD A CHANCE….

John Friedricks

January 18th, 2013
5:22 am

I watched most of this hearing via web feed. Walker was unimpressive, defensive, and combative. Copelin-Wood was so unimpressive that the state board did not even bother to follow up with further questions. Jester gave the impression that she possessed some understanding of things but also admitted that she is powerless amongst those who are entrenched in power. Again, Copelin-Wood was just so bad! She has to be removed at once! You could not see it on the feed, but the meeting had to be stopped for a moment because of some kind of disruptions from the gallery. Apparently “noises and facial gestures” were disrupting the meeting and the chair had to address them on the record. The vote was delayed to ensure “due process”. It was difficult to watch but you couldn’t help but stare at it like a bad wreck on the perimeter.

concernedmom30329

January 18th, 2013
6:26 am

Honestly, Copelin-Woods is the board member who actually cares about students the most (of the 6 returning board members). She has not aged well.
She has never been a very effective board member, in part because of deficits in her own education, but she use to try. She would ask the superintendents about test scores, low performance, etc. She could never get traction because she didn’t ever have all the information.
It is also worth pointing out that she is the only board member to consistently oppose all these pre-packaged programs like America’s Choice and Success for All. She understands that there is something inherently wrong with these purchases but she has never been articulate enough to express her thoughts and convince others.
Sadly, her community contains some of the lowest performing schools in the state. They have been allowed to wallow because she is so ineffective. She was singly focused on just a handful of schools. Now I am afraid she is so out of it that she is mostly unaware of what is going on.
She needs to be pushed to resign by her own community but as you can imagine there aren’t many engaged citizens there.

Private School Guy

January 18th, 2013
6:38 am

Will BOE members please stop with the “I’m doing this because I love the children”. You should be doing this because you are competent at managing a budget of nearly a billion dollars. If you love children go volunteer at a school. They have very few teacher assistants anymore due to your gross financial mismanagement.

Jan

January 18th, 2013
6:58 am

Asking the BOE to reinvent itself in 30 days is like asking a zebra to change its stripes.

These issues and behaviors are too entrenched. Even getting rid of the BOE won’t help since the problem goes so much deeper. We need a complete administrative palace-cleaning at DCSS.

Done in Dekalb

January 18th, 2013
7:00 am

The morale is so low at our school. The latest AP to get their online Argosy degree wants to be called “Doctor.” Sure. We all got emails with the excited congratualtory message: “Dr.”So and So”, has accomplished…blah blah woof woof. As if it meant anything whatsover. The system is shot full of these phoney time serving careerists with their phoney online degrees from top to bottom. The board is just the visible layer of a dumbed down system with dumb administrators, all in the dum dum club. Pay is great, though, I hear.
You just realize, after working for a profit most of your life, that these mopes could do absolutely nothing else. Phoneys. Yeah, right, I’m going to call you “Doctor Mope”, from now on. Not this lifetime.

Wondering Allowed

January 18th, 2013
7:32 am

Anyone know if Atkinson had a real excuse, or if she came down with the Plagiarist’s Defender Flu? Short of a family member obit in the next two days, I’m thinking she dodged having to show her incompetent self at the meeting. Likely yet another reason (this week) she has shown herself to be the wrong person for the job.

agent

January 18th, 2013
7:40 am

Anyone want to wager that in the unlikely event one of the board members does get ousted, there will be a discrimination lawsuit filed?

Agent

January 18th, 2013
7:46 am

Anyone want to wager that in the unlikely event one of the board members does get ousted, there will be a discrimination lawsuit filed.

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
8:17 am

Well, well, well…

It appears that the State Board of Education has already been given its marching orders…get rid of the DeKalb Board of Education. It looks like a done deal…and Mrs. Atkinson didn’t even show up for the meeting.

Let’s see now. If SACS wants to continue to be the Union for Superintendents (remember that SACS stands for Still Advocating for Cronies and Superintendents), then perhaps it ought to visit Bibb County. The school board keeps voting in 4 to 4 split decisions all night…like it did last night. I hear that Superintendent Romain Dallemand left with security last night. His so-called “Macon Miracle” is more like a “Macon Nightmare.” It is a joke, and the teachers hate it. But, we don’t hear from SACS about this situation, do we?

Or, do we hear from SACS in Cobb County where the school board members fight like cats and dogs…over such great and heavy issues like school calendars. Ha! Or, what about their 57 illegal school board meetings? Nah…no big deal because this is “advisor” Glenn Brock’s home school board. After all, he is apparently Mark Elgart’s best buddy when it comes to accreditation, right?

I remember when Clayton County’s all-white 11 person school board used to scrap and fight all night (well after midnight!) over all kinds of issues. The late Larry Foster who used to sit on the State School Board as well as serve as the attorney for the Clayton County Board of Education was right there in the mix. Did SACS ever come calling? Nah. Never heard from Mark Elart and SACS back then. And the school board survived until the next election…and the children got along admirably.

I remember the Greene County Board of Education being split and fighting big time over the Lake Oconee issue and the push for a new charter school out there. Yeah, it just worked itself out O. K….like it is supposed to without SACS or any other outside influence group meddling in the local affairs.

What about when ole Alvin Wilkinson in Gwinnett County didn’t file the required report for about 45, 000 serious disciplinary incidents with the State? Did Mark Elgart and SACS rush in or even issue a feint warning? Nah. No big deal. After all, this is the “Great Gwinnett,” and even Eli Broad recently issued a reward for Gwinnett being such a great “urban” system. Ha!

Apparently, for SACS to get involved, the issues have to be laced with race. Ouch! Some will get fighting mad about this statement. But, you know that I am just going to tell the truth. You see…when things can’t get worked out politically (because one side doesn’t have the requisite votes), well, then you call in SACS. Let SACS do the “dirty work.” Heavens to Betsey! DeKalb is now on “SACS probation.” Surprise, surprise! Hey, we now have to get the Governor involved! Our kids’ future is at stake! Those kids who made a perfect score on the SAT at Chamblee High School need the Governor! No, they need Mark Elgart and SACS to stay at home in Alpharetta! That’s what they need! They don’t need any more outside influence groups getting involved in the real politick of the DeKalb County Board of Education. The triumvirate of SACS-Governor-State Board will screw things up big time…beyond all recognition. This “cure” is worse than any conceived “ailment.” They will make it so that no parent in their right mind would ever want to move into DeKalb County and place their babies in the DeKalb School System. The DeKalb School System will become even more of a hiss and a byword.

Let Mark do it. Let Mark do it. Let Mark Elgart do it now! Let him destroy one more school system…one more community! I bet that no matter what…Mark Elgart would NEVER, NEVER put the Fulton County School System “on probation.” Heck, he’d have to face too many mommas in the Produce Section of the Alpharetta Publix. They would be white with anger! Have you ever seen white anger?! Ha! It can be pretty nasty. Like it was over there at the Marietta Square a few years ago…when the locals strung up ole Leo Frank in the Townsquare…not far from the Big Chicken. They were so mistakenly caught up in anger that they drove on old dusty roads all the way down to Milledgeville to wrestle him out of the local jail down there and brought him “home” to Marietta! Amidst an atmosphere of Bar-b-que and fiddlin’, they hanged Leo Frank amid great celebration.

White mob action can be very nasty. Very nasty. I have seen it personally. Up close. Directed right at me. Just because I helped a few folks get elected to a school board. I remember telling a wild, clamoring mob, foaming at the mouth with vitriolic racism: “The first redneck who lays a hand on me will find his a*s in jail!” I think that this very direct statement shocked many in the audience, both black and while – and the reporters too! The “reporters” reported that I used “profanity.” I just used language that rednecks understand. They understood me, and they understood that I was not afraid of their getting in my face, shouting, pushing up against my body, etc. The Jonesboro police officer repeated that I had a right not to be pushed and that I was right in that if anyone laid a hand on me, that they would be going to jail.

Yes, yes, yes. I have seen the mob action many times. It’s pretty much race-based. When white folks acted or still act fools on the school board, I have never seen SACS darken (no pun intended) the door. Clayton County is a classic example. When the school board was split down the middle with Republicans and Democrats (all white, mind you), it was a better show each week than Georgia Championship Wrestling, but I never saw Mark Elgart in the stands eating popcorn. Never. He never showed up. Just let those crazy white folks in Clayton County work out their own problems. Boys will be boys, and girls will be girls. That’s just ole Clayco. They’ve always been a little crazy about their politics down there, even though they have Spivey Hall! Ha!

Well, I could go on and on and tick off some more people, but let me go get another cup of coffee. Oh, by the way, did you notice how arrogant-looking these appointed State Board member were yesterday? All stuffy and full of self-importance. Heck, they are just appointed people. Yes, appointed. They haven’t been elected to jack-sh*t. So, they gave a lot of money to someone’s campaign and got themselves appointed. So what.

Hamilton

January 18th, 2013
8:20 am

Then they can spend their own money on their attorney. I’m sick of taxpayers having to pay the legal bills for the collective of idiots running DeKalb County AND DCSS.

catlady

January 18th, 2013
8:22 am

The “tell” was that the board members spent time defending themselves, instead of addressing the problems. Should have sent the recommendation on to the governor immediately! And the new board members, all they needed to say was, ‘You know I took office a few weeks ago, but I am committed to moving this board forward.” That they said more is also a “tell.”

Atkinson also should be dismissed, but I guess that is up to the new board.

Nichole

January 18th, 2013
8:33 am

ABSOLUTELY NOT. As an employee of this district, this has been a long time coming and personally, Im sick and tired of this. We work long hours for little to no pay, get talked to and harrassed by the board any kind of way.Enough is enough. They should not have gotten until Feb 21st. They should have been unseated last night, the only way that DeKalb will regain its dignity and get back on track is if the state department and the SACS committee stop slowpoking around and MAKE CHANGES. What else is there needed to bust these people up?! Is it going to take an entire walkout for them to see we are sick and tired? Atkinson needs to go too. I have YET to see any changes. Shes sneaky, conniving and a poor example of a leader. You can google her resume and see that she has a track record for moving around. She means DeKalb no good, and as a result, students and employees are suffering at the hands of her.

Maureen Downey

January 18th, 2013
8:37 am

@John, Wanda Barrs did ask for a reprimand of people in the audience for inappropriate responses but it was not clear what she saw that bothered her. And another state board member commented that he had not seen or heard anything. Those of us at the press table did not see or hear anything that would have merited Barrs’ concern. I assume that it may have been folks shaking their heads in dismay over what was being said by the DeKalb board member at the podium — I think it was Walker at the time — or audience members mouthing something like, “No, no, no” as he spoke
But there was no audible interruption of any speaker.
Maureen

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
8:46 am

They’re really got the meeting videos ported via proprietary Real Player format? And I’m going to have to spend a half hour dealiing with this? http://uk.real.com/realplayer/other_versions.html And had to go to the UK Real Player website just to find the Linux version?

Meanwhile Mr. Barge, I must give him credit, ports his videos via YouTube or other standard format. These meeting videos should be in something other than Real Player format that requires their proprietary player. Even on the Real Player website, they are trying to sell software to for people to download files from YouTube and Vimeo. GA DOE, or whoever, please! Stop with the DRM Real Player format for videos. Its 20 years obsolete! Help!

Dunwoody Mom

January 18th, 2013
8:48 am

This present BOE cannot even begin to change in 30 days. The culture of the BOE (past and present) and this school district is too entrenched. To borrow a phrase from another DCSS parent, It’s time to “reset” DCSS. A new BOE, a new Superintendent and a brand new educational system in this county, (I think Nancy Jester’s Portfolio District bears a look). Even with a new BOE and Super, the same issues will still be before us.

I attended the hearing for a few hours before I had to leave to go back to work. I do believe that the State BOE and others got a first hand view of the total dysfunction and lack of grasp of the issue that characterizes this BOE and that is why they did not approve the agreed upon 11-point Consent Degree. Dr. Walker clearly had no grasp of reality and I believe he did a lot of damage to his credibility and that of the BOE (if they had any); I thought Pamela Speaks did ok with what she had to work with. Marshall Orson spent his time reminding the State BOE that he and 2 others were new to BOE; admitted he had visited “his” schools. I left as Jay Cunninham began to speak.

Note: to Dr. Walker and Marshall Orson, you are to represent all students, not just “your” districts. A point brought out in the SACS report, that obviously even the new members did not grasp.

A long sufferring DeKalb parent

January 18th, 2013
8:49 am

At what point can we all say enough is enough? The most recent DeKalb School superintendent and staff going to trial for corruption, the DeKalb School system on probation by SACS for the first time in its history, no clear answer for $25 million borrowed from banks for textbooks and the school board can’t show evidence that any books were purchased and the list goes on and on. It’s time for the Georgia BOE remove the DeKalb School Board and let the Governor decide which members (probably the members who just got elected) can remain on the Board. Please Governor, the citizens of DeKalb County deserve better than this!

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
8:51 am

Is there a reason to put inconvenient heavy Digital Rights Management on public meeting videos posted for the public to see? Are you afraid someone is going to make a rapper spoof edit? Or is it prohibited for people to have a copy? Real Player proprietary format – What a Pain in the Neck. Call A Chiropracter! Owe! This is like sending people to a toll both in Utah in order to see the video, and tell them to bring some quarters.

Bill & Ed's Excellent Adventure

January 18th, 2013
8:52 am

@sandy springs – thanks for that observation, too bad it’s irrelevent to the discussion.

@momindunwoody – Dunwoody mom? Sounds like it.

@concernedmom – SCW has only ever cared about race, bottom line. She needs to go ASAP, along with Walker & Cunningham.

Prediction – Orson and McMahan will help Walker (despite himself) to get the three months to try appease SACS. Unless some other dramatic issue arises, this will stay status quo.

Bill & Ed's Excellent Adventure

January 18th, 2013
8:55 am

@Dunwoody Mom – there you are. Does Jester represent all districts, or just Dunwoody?

Dunwoody Mom

January 18th, 2013
8:56 am

Well, I admit I was shaking my head and rolling my eyes early on, especially when the State BOE legal counsel indicated she wanted the prior agreed upon 11-point Consent Decree to be adopted. It as so disheartening to believe that this BOE would be given any more time to clearn up its act.

skipper

January 18th, 2013
8:57 am

Others in other arenas have been given a time limit, but that is because the ability may have been there but the results were not reflective of it. This board, on the other hand, does not (as a unit) have the cumulitive ability from the get go. The very things (nepotism, etc.) that have been mentioned above re-enforce that. As so many on this blog and others have pointed out, qualifications on an education front are not necessarily a pre-requisite for election to a school board. The election of often incompetant people is a reflection on the population. Apparantly, the attitude of “keepin’ it real’ is much more important than the education of the kids. You may deduct what you will from my statements, but this board and school district in general are a mess!!

Fred in DeKalb

January 18th, 2013
8:58 am

Dr. Trotter, your post will fall on deaf ears. I read one of your other posts in an earlier blog about the legal issues with regards to removing constitutionally elected officials. Due process is the law. Many attacked you for bringing that up. There is a mob that is looking for others to do their bidding and they will criticize anyone that gets in their way with facts and history.

Dunwoody Mom

January 18th, 2013
9:00 am

A “mob” Fred? Really?

Atlanta Media Guy

January 18th, 2013
9:01 am

Like I have been saying since CLew was indicted, EVERYONE AT THE PALACE MUST GO! We need a total cleansing at the Palace, or nothing is going to change. Sure the BOE is to blame, but so is the waste and fraud being displayed every day on Stone Mtn. Ind.

EVERYONE HAS TO GO! Ms. Tyson you are no longer wanted by the majority of the DCSD stakeholders, why are you still stealing from our kids education…..I think you have done enough to destroy our district and as interim YOU DID NOTHING TO CHANGE THE CORRUPT CULTURE!

DCSD where mediocrity is celebrated and has been rewarded for over 10 years!

Bill & Ed's Excellent Adventure

January 18th, 2013
9:03 am

@Dunwoodymom – After reading the testimonies in the blog yesterday, I have to admit this is one of the few instances in which I tend to agree with you.

Dawn

January 18th, 2013
9:04 am

I agree with everything Teacher Reader said. I wish the board (only in this one instance to clean the slate) had that power. I also wish they would hire someone from the business world who knows how to get things done as superintendent.

Frankly, I’m mentally exhausted by this whole mess. I want to quit, give up. If I even dared to dream that anyone with a lick of sense would want to move to DeKalb, I’d try to sell my house and leave this cesspool.

I’ve never been more discouraged or hopeless about anything in my life than when I try to imagine my children getting a decent education in the schools my taxes pay for here in DeKalb. I wish I could take my property taxes and use that for private school. That would be the only hope of my kids getting a decent education as long as I live here. When we moved to DeKalb the schools were some of the best in the state. Oh what 20 years of the wrong people being in charge can do.

Think About It

January 18th, 2013
9:05 am

If the state get’s removes the school board, who replaces them! You bring in a crew who knows nothing about running the school system or do you let the state run your local school? As an elected official who do you represent, the people who put their faith in you by casting their vote for you or the county as a whole. If infighting is a big deal then we need to remove every congressman in the country, we need to shut down the local, state, and federal governments. Do they make all the right decisions, appropriate money in all the right places? Everybody can’t have their way, it’s gonna be disagreements when you are trying to get what’s best for your constituents. These are the people we elected to run this system, if they are not doing their job, come election time get rid of them. I don’t think this is a matter for the state to decide but for the people of Dekalb to do what’s best for the county.

CJae of EAV

January 18th, 2013
9:07 am

It would a considerable challenge for any long standing governance body to reinvent themselves in 30 day period. I don’t doubt members of the State BOE will spend the next 30 days being lobbied by prominent business leaders who either already do business with DCSS or are seeking to engage business contracts with DCSS in an effort to sway the next course of action.

Clearly it would be foolhardy to expect the DCSS BOE to have any sort of fundamental culture shift in 30 days. This tells me the State BOE already knows what it is going to do and therefore should have issued its edict right up from instead of engaging this unnecessary pomp and circumstance.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
9:14 am

Currently the video is OFFLINE. I called the help number. It takes about a week? for them to edit it (removing dead air time?) and compile and then put link to archive page http://www.gadoe.org/External-Affairs-and-Policy/State-Board-of-Education/Pages/Webcast-Archive.aspx

Currently it is UNAVAILABLE and will be for “about a week…”

Astropig

January 18th, 2013
9:20 am

Real school choice -vouchers- would put people like this board back where they belong-in jobs where they could not screw up our children’s futures.Every comment on this board is another argument for taking our schools out of the hands of the corrupt,entrenched interests that run them presently.

alm

January 18th, 2013
9:21 am

“We don’t have people taking money.” Well Dr. Walker when friends and family are hired for too much money for too little experience then yes people are taking money from the school system. Members of the BOE may not benefit from it but they do nothing to stop it either.

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
9:21 am

@ Fred: I appreciate your thoughts. I don’t really expect to change anyone’s mind. I really don’t. People believe what they want to believe, despite the facts. Ha! But, I do enjoy telling the truth. It makes me feel good.

SACS is a phony (or is it phoney?) organization…simply used by those politcally-connected to circumvent the political process when those politcally-connected people can’t control the local politics but still want to get their way. In my opinion, Mark Elgart is just a stooge.

Just Sayin.....

January 18th, 2013
9:24 am

If Clayton county is any indication, then the jerks who make up the Dekalb school board will take the “its not me, its him/them” attitude right to the end. Their hubris prevents them from making any meaningful permanent change. What is it about school boards that attracts/creates these mini tyrants?

I am just glad that Georgia has a way to expediently remove them.

bu2

January 18th, 2013
9:25 am

Barrs, who thought the 30 days was rather short, is a school board member. She understood. The most critical members, Burdette, Royal and Zechmann are the scary ones. Burdette is former chairman of a zoning board in his county. Royal is chairman of the corrupt Gwinnet zoning boad. Zechman does “business” partnerships with schools. They’ve got the type of background, who if they were on your school board, you would really need to hold onto your purse strings.

Nothing significant can happen in 30 days. Its not realistic.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
9:29 am

Are they using Real Player because it is part of church culture? http://www.sljinstitute.net/%5Csermons%5Cnew%20testament%5Cgeneral%5Chebrews%5Chebrews29%5Crp_template.html Maybe someone speaking in “thee” and “thou” (which is a translation from the original) might note that the “eternal message” is being delivered by obsolete software that was invented pretty recently.

Astropig

January 18th, 2013
9:43 am

“SACS is a phony (or is it phoney?) organization…simply used by those politcally-connected to circumvent the political process when those politcally-connected people can’t control the local politics but still want to get their way. In my opinion, Mark Elgart is just a stooge.”

Dumbest comment…Ever. SACS is not perfect (no organization is) , but they are doing what politicians won’t do-Holding the crooks in positions like the DeKalb school board accountable.SACS doesn’t have to run for election and re-election,so they can tell it like it is.And it is…As bad as it can be in DeKalb.They are like a a smoke detector-You may not like what you’re hearing,but it’s important to listen and act.

These are our kids that we are talking about.Time to start cleaning house.

bu2

January 18th, 2013
9:44 am

@Sandy Springs Mom
Your comment is not only irrelevant, its untrue. I know plenty of Emory and CDC employees with kids in Dekalb schools. Since you are in SS, you wouldn’t know.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
9:46 am

And the winning comment is: The system is shot full of these phoney time serving careerists with their phoney online degrees from top to bottom.

Somebody federal was trying to do something about the online for-profit degree mills. It looks like they are still in full play. The only way to deal with it is for the education establishment to stop accepting these as credential. The problem is, superintendents have them, too. This is a huge thing. And it makes a culture clash with bosses who don’t know any better bought online degrees that include a little work, but then they manage people with real degrees from real schools. The online degree people tend to stick together, clump together. It is not unlike the situation where “if a student can not plagiarise, a boss can not plagiarise.” When the bosses have decided to subvert credentialing and use school designed to provide quick faux degrees that use the title and form factor of traditional university, it is just a bizarre situation. Stephen King could not have thought this up for one of his horror movies. Any of the you thinkers of lawyers out there, what is the best way to moderate the impact and influence of these “Phoenix” and “Argosy” degrees that are quick and expensive? The real answer would be to have strict requirements for degree to go with job and require public administration degree and have these strongly accredited to include substantial components. The whole “leadership degree” thing is a perversion. It is like code-speak for “playah.” I’m not making it up. Serious. Can we write a law to prohibit leadership degrees as a credential for building administrator or superintendent? Those of use who are educated and have do the work to go to real schools need to start fighting back.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
9:52 am

“Leadership” degrees are like Scientology. Countries with strong governance are throwing Scientology out of their country, or treating them as for-profit business not as tax-exempt church. Or banning them as criminals.Check it out. It’s like a list of who has their act together and who does not: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology_status_by_country

I wish there was a similar document for “leadership” degrees, where they are accepted and where they are banned.

bu2

January 18th, 2013
9:53 am

Think and CJae
You share a lot of my thoughts. Who replaces these people? Who understands enough to deal with Atkinson who clearly has been over her head so far in the budget and facilities planning processes (and who protects plagiarists if they are her hires)? The 3 new people all have extensive experience with the schools and their local PTAs.

Wondering Allowed

January 18th, 2013
10:05 am

@bu2 – The majority of professionals I know who live in the inincorporated area of Druid Hills, Toco Hills, the Medlock Park area and the Briarcliff corridor have moved their kids into private schools in the middle of this school year. The conditions in DeKalb County schools have gotten that bad that quickly.

More importanta than the people who already live in DeKalb, absolutely nobody wants to move to DeKalb County and have their kids go to these schools. There is a reason Decatur homes sell quickly and for top dollar. The difference between the price paid for a house on the northeast side of the Ponce/Lawrenceville highway split and the southeast side, or, for that matter, the north side and south sides of Pharr Rd is hundreds of thousands of dollars. The houses are similar. The schools are different.

Wondering Allowed

January 18th, 2013
10:07 am

that should be “northwest” side of Ponce/Lawrenceville versus southeast side…

Bill & Ed's Excellent Adventure

January 18th, 2013
10:37 am

@wondering allowed – thanks for the update on what your friends are doing. I’ve lived in Dekalb since 1984. I’m not thrilled about the current state of our local government or school board, but I’m not ready to pull up stakes and head for the northern suburbs just yet. We are looking at our options for middle school and beyond. Meanwhile, my children attend, in my opinion, one of the best elementary schools in Georgia. Despite the system’s current failures, we have a strong principal and our students are high achievers.

Maureen Downey

January 18th, 2013
10:38 am

@bu2, I have to add that I attended a meeting at a middle school where many of the parents who spoke were CDC employees.
Maureen

Pardon My Blog

January 18th, 2013
10:56 am

This Board will not change in 30 days, heck, most of them were parading around in front of the media saying they back Clew 100%. This dysfunction has been going on since at least 2002 (you really see the ineptitude when your child starts High School). They have been able to cover up many poor decisions by Lewis and others, favorability, inept staff, etc. and continue to do so.

The whole Administration needs to go, not just the Board. Central office is a joke and there is so much waste. Clean house, review salaries, check certifications, hire people who truly have the experience and qualifications for the position. Perhaps two districts make a lot of sense especially since issues are so different in the Northern side of the county as opposed to the South side.

Bottomline, don’t give them 30 days. The Board, all of them, are a big joke with the biggest clown being Eugene Walker. Then the State should take steps to get a decent Superintendent in here. Let’s do something positive for DeKalb!

Dunwoody Mom

January 18th, 2013
11:01 am

Maureen, do you know if the original consent decree agreed to by the State BOE Legal Counsel and DCSS BOE that was rejected by the State BOE will be made public?

bu2

January 18th, 2013
11:06 am

@Wondering
Are you talking about Ponce and Scott St. (as opposed to N. Decatur and Lawrenceville)? If so, that isn’t what the AJC reports on real estate prices are showing. They show that section of Dekalb doing well.

As far as Decatur, we bought about 4 years ago and looked closely at a lot of areas. For some reason I don’t understand, the city of Decatur significantly underperformed the real estate market in the 5 or 6 years prior to that time. It looked primed to takeoff, but it still hasn’t happened.

And I don’t know of anyone who has left our school in the middle of the year except for moving out of the area. Most large private schools don’t admit in the middle of the year.

Most everyone is pretty pleased with the elementary school. Everyone evaluates what to do with middle school. Urban districts just do not do middle schools well.

Maureen Downey

January 18th, 2013
11:06 am

@Dunwoody, It should be available as it is a public document. I can ask DOE.

Dekalbite@Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
11:10 am

You don’t live in DeKalb and your children don’t go to school in DeKalb so your words don’t carry a lot of weight with the citizens who live here and send their children to DeKalb County Schools.

DeKalb has many beautiful areas that are safe and close to all the amenities that a big city has to offer. Perimeter Mall as well as the Emory and CDC areas are economic powerhouses that feed the tax base of Georgia. We have Arabia Mountain and Stone Mountain which are beautiful parks and many more instances of lovely green space in DeKalb. I can be downtown visiting the High Musem in 15 minutes even in rush hour or dining in Midtown in the same amount of time. There are many advantagges to living in DeKalb. The main disadvantage is the school system, and that cannot be overstated as a disadvantage. Actually, neighborhood schools in the affluent areas of DeKalb have maintained their high academic standards, and for many years the seedy underbelly that passed for the administration of the the school system did not appreciably affect those areas. DeKalb Schools was a “Tale of Two Systems”. The Great Recession and NCLB helped rip the veneer off the incompetence and inequity that is DeKalb and accelerated a process of decline due to unbelievably poor management and active investment in everything but the classrooms. As the affluent and in some cases formerly affluent areas of DeKalb began to experience “the DeKalb Way” in their schools up close and personal, parents were forced to become more vocal and more active.

Advising citizens to move from DeKalb or place their children in private schools are not workable solutions for the 98,000 children in DeKalb who depend on public education. DeKalb students are not less intelligent, the teachers are not less hardworking, and the parents are not less involved than other systems with similar demographics. There is nothing inherently wrong with our children. Many of us do not want to throw up our hands and give up on a decent education for the majority of our children.

Dunwoody Mom

January 18th, 2013
11:10 am

Thanks!! I am curious to see exactly what those 11 items were that they all agreed to.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
11:13 am

Altanta Media Guy EVERYONE AT THE PALACE MUST GO!

…to Six Flags!

Concernedmom30329

January 18th, 2013
11:19 am

Are you sure about that Bu– City of Decatur is doing very well, in large part because of its schools.

I suspect BU2 and Bill are both Fernbank parents. Fernbank has manage to insulate itself from some of the DCSS woes by having the ability to fully fund at least two teaching positions. Additionally, though they said they weren’t going to do so, I believe DCSS is still giving extra dollars to the IB schools.

For most of the rest of DeKalb, the budget cuts have been damaging and many families are beyond concerned. For what it is worth, Fernbank saw a small drop in its enrollment this year.

Finally, what saddens me the most is that what the parents pay for at Fernbank is standard in Fulton and Cobb and yet no parents in DeKalb demand more.

dekalbite@Sandy Springs

January 18th, 2013
11:24 am

My neighborhood is filled with CDC and Emory employees who send their children to the local schools and yes it is the Lakeside area. It’s not called the Clifton Corridor for nothing. Lakeside is bursting at the seams since so many younger people have been moving into the neighborhood as the retirees and older folk move out.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
11:25 am

(thinking cap on) Another way to moderate the effect of “leadership” degrees is to regulate the salaries of central office and administrator staff. For example, if a teacher is $50k/yr., it is my opinion that central office administrative people should not be paid more than $75k/yr, or, in other words, 1.5x what a teacher is paid, although many teachers are paid closer to $40k. The whole salary thing is all over the place. It would be meritous to change / restructure the entire pay concept. I think the time-served graduated pay school is causing problems, too. Long term highly paid teachers are being routed out of their positions, meanwhile new hires teach with some other long-term teachers being paid twice as much as them. and then the whole “executive compensation” thing on the top end, with these imitation corporate salaries for public service. “Pay more to get more” doesn’t apply to teachers, why should is apply to admin. and executive staff? How can this be remedied, I wonder? It is pretty big concept. Real teachers do not do it for the pay. It would be a welcome development for those who teach because “that is what they do.” They pay would probably go up some for those without 10 years in the system, etc. and so on. I guess it would take some kind of organised initiative to do anything about it, but maybe the first step is awareness. Point is, these 100k+ salaries are an attractor for the whole “leadership” degree thing. I think it goes together.

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
11:29 am

@ Astropig: If SACS would consistently apply its so-called standards, this would be interesting. But, SACS never does. Never. SACS always arbitrarily and capriciously applies its so-called standards. You don’t see SACS coming down on the foolishness in Cobb, Fulton, or Gwinnett, do you? Don’t try to say that is does not exist. It does.

“Crooks”? Are we really calling the school board members “crooks”? A little hysteria, don’t you think? If they are indeed crooks, then you don’t need to be calling on SACS for help you; rather, you should call on the District Attorney.

Nothing will change. I have seen it so many times before. You can’t get politics out of politics. By definition, a seat on the DeKalb School Board is a political position. Pure and simple. The same stuff goes on in Griffin-Spalding, Hart County, Hancock County, Richmond County, Muscogee County, Jackson County, Clarke County, White County, just to name a few. Politics will always be on the school boards and in the school systems. The difference in DeKalb? Too many influential and politically-connected (with the Governor’s Office) people still live in DeKalb. They can’t get their way anymore, and they are mad as heck about this. When the school board was still majority white (about five years ago) and hired the incapable Crawford Lewis, no one raised a stink…because, I think, the influential folk on Lullwater and in Dunwoody still trusted the school board. When the black got a little “darker,” that trust went out the window.

Get mad at me again for telling you the truth. I love seeing your reactions. Ha!

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
11:33 am

Let’s try this again…or am I still be “moderated”?

@ Astropig: If SACS would consistently apply its so-called standards, this would be interesting. But, SACS never does. Never. SACS always arbitrarily and capriciously applies its so-called standards. You don’t see SACS coming down on the foolishness in Cobb, Fulton, or Gwinnett, do you? Don’t try to say that is does not exist. It does.

“Crooks”? Are we really calling the school board members “crooks”? A little hysteria, don’t you think? If they are indeed crooks, then you don’t need to be calling on SACS for help you; rather, you should call on the District Attorney.

Nothing will change. I have seen it so many times before. You can’t get politics out of politics. By definition, a seat on the DeKalb School Board is a political position. Pure and simple. The same stuff goes on in Griffin-Spalding, Hart County, Hancock County, Richmond County, Muscogee County, Jackson County, Clarke County, White County, just to name a few. Politics will always be on the school boards and in the school systems. The difference in DeKalb? Too many influential and politically-connected (with the Governor’s Office) people still live in DeKalb. They can’t get their way anymore, and they are mad as heck about this. When the school board was still majority white (about five years ago) and hired the incapable Crawford Lewis, no one raised a stink…because, I think, the influential folk on Lullwater and in Dunwoody still trusted the school board. When the black got a little “darker,” that trust went out the window.

Get mad at me again for telling you the truth. I love seeing your reactions. Ha!

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
11:34 am

Are my comments still being “moderated”? Ha! Mr. Filter keeps my comments at bay.

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
11:36 am

Were my words “Lullwater” and “Dunwoody” too incendiary?

Disgusted

January 18th, 2013
11:42 am

Concernedmom, you say “no parents in Dekalb demand more.” My experience has been that parents in Dekalb have been demanding more for at least a decade. Teachers give us and our students all they can and then some while working in horrible conditions with next to no resources; some administrators, not all, actually do all they can to discourage these parents (our board chairman refers to them as “disgruntled”) in hopes that they will leave the system.

Dunwoody Mom

January 18th, 2013
11:42 am

Dr. Trotter, you’re the only one who “sees color” in this conversation…well, you and Eugene Walker.

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
11:55 am

@ Dunwoody Mom: I think that I am the only one who will tell the truth. This stuff only happens when white folks can’t get their way in school systems which have a majority black school board. I have seen so much foolishness going on among majority white school boards (Fulton, Cobb, Gwinnett, just to name a few), but SACS doesn’t respond to calls for help. I have read where parents say that they have written to SACS, but they got no response from SACS. Sorry, DM, but I am just stating the obvious.

Dunwoody Mom

January 18th, 2013
12:00 pm

What do you “get our way”? The parents of this school district just want a quality education for their children – race is not an issue here – it’s competence of the school board and school administration. Many have been just as hard on the caucasian members of the school board. Really, just stop with the racial issues – it’s not relevant to what is going on in DCSS.

Teacher Reader

January 18th, 2013
12:11 pm

@ Dr. Trotter, I am disappointed in you for bringing color into this conversation. The problems with DeKalb are not one color or group, the problems are with South DeKalb, Fernbank parents, and everyone in between. Everyone is out for their child, and no one is looking at the big picture. This is the biggest problem with DeKalb.

Everyone wants their special programs, reguardless of cost, number of kids, and countless other things that need to be looked at when making decisions. No one is caring if the kids in the regular schools throughout the county get a good education. If the teachers are able to teach kids in over crowded classrooms, or if we continue to pass kids along who have limited skills and are now in middle school on a 4th grade level.

No Dr. Trotter, this is not a white, black, Hispanic, Asian, green, purple or blue issue. This issue is about ADULTS caring about ADULTS, and not giving a darn about the children that they are paid to educate.

I have only been in DeKalb for 6 years. Taught in it for 3, having taught in other places around the country, and DeKalb was the worst teaching experience I have ever had, and frankly I’ve worked in much tougher places, but the lack of care and concern for the children is appalling. I wouldn’t send an animal to a school in DeKalb. We have stayed because we are underwater in our home, my husband has a nice commute to work, and I can homeschool my son. We are seriously thinking of selling the house for whatever we can get, ruining our credit, and moving to another location with better schools, less drama, and a longer commute for my husband.

You bringing up color really disgusts me, and is part of the reason why I want to leave DeKalb. I grew up in a very racially mixed area up North, and have friends of all backgrounds to this day from elementary and high school. I don’t see black and white. I see dysfunctional adults who are out for their friends, family, and themselves, and the children are a last priority all together. That goes for the two new school board members as well. I asked Orson to his face if he was going to be for the entire district or just our area, and he told me the entire district, and I didn’t see that in the hearing yesterday. One cannot understand the problems without visiting the schools, but you need to visit all of the schools, as each school has it’s own unique problems.

DeKalb won’t change until people stop talking about race and start looking with clear vision at the real problems. This is not Black or White, it’s about dysfunction and trying to get the most out of the district for those that you know. It happens in the county government as well. It’s pervasive in DeKalb, and really is no better than the Chicago politics that I saw when living in Chicago and that I see often happening now in Washington, except that those in DeKalb aren’t suave enough to cover their tracks.

bu2

January 18th, 2013
12:33 pm

Race is used by people, but its not a real issue. There are poor students all over the county. There are minority students all over the county. There are few majority white elementary schools and I don’t believe any are over 80%. At the HS level, I believe Lakeside is the only majority white HS, and as I recall, its in the low 50s. Last figures I saw, Dunwoody was around 40% white, Chamblee in the 30s, Tucker around 10%, Druid Hills 25%. Cross Keys is overwhelmingly Hispanic.

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
12:35 pm

@ DM. Race is very relevant. It is the obvious thing that is going on by calling in SACS, The Guv, and the State Board. Get out there and help elect candidates of your liking. That’s how the process of democracy works. I hate gnostic take-overs. I hate oligarchies. I hate incompetence just like you do. But, more than incompetence, I hate seeing the powers-who-be circumvent the democratic process. Hey, I voted for Romney, but he didn’t win, did he? I didn’t pout and call upon the U. N. to take out President Obama. (For the record, I voted for President Obama the first time.) I didn’t like his economic policies and the government take-over of healthcare. So, I voted for Romney this past election. But, guess what? President Obama got the most votes, and he is still the President. Bully for him. He will be inaugurated for his second term. Quite historic, I think. But, I still didn’t vote for him.

If I lived in DeKalb, I would probably not vote for many of the incumbents. But, I would be recruiting candidates and/or helping challengers. I wouldn’t be calling on SACS or the Governor for help. Get off the couch and put up signs until the wee hours of the morning. Do the hard and dirty work to get elected or to get others elected. This is all that I am saying.

There is a pattern. SACS responds to the influential people who can’t get their way at the ballot box. SACS is as inconsistent as the day is long. SACS is a tool used by the influential…just like the old convict lease system was used right after the Civil War to take care of the “labor problem.” Only the wealthy and well-connected profited from the convict lease system. It was race-based…just like SACS is. Race has always been intricately woven into the very fabric of American politics…from the days of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787.

By the way, my great, great grandfather, Robert A. Alston, was the only State Representative in DeKalb in 1879, and he was murdered at the Georgia Capitol in the process of trying to outlaw the convict lease system. He is buried in the old Decatur Cemetery, and his antebellum home, the second oldest house still standing in Atlanta, is located on Alston Drive in front of the East Lake Country Club. Back in the day, he pretty much owned all of East Lake (about 400 acres). My grandfather, Robert Alston Trotter, Alston’s first grandchild, was born in Meadownook (the Alston house on Alston Drive). His cousin, Dr. Wallace Alston, was President of Agnes Scott College for 22 years. Others relatives lived in DeKalb for years. My brother and I both taught and coached in DeKalb County a few years back. I have a few connections to DeKalb, and I may just move back over there one day. Now this ought to stir up some mess! Ha!

LOGIC

January 18th, 2013
12:58 pm

@Dr. Trotter
The real “race” issue then becomes that the poorer high minority schools are worse off than they were 15-20 years ago with majority representation today. How do you explain the group that doesn’t even take care of its “own” children? Easily – they don’t care and are just taking care of themselves by creating an employment pipeline for the inept.

Race is an excuse when the reality is that these representatives haven’t met the needs of their own constituents and hide behind race as the issue. Look at what immigrants of all races and creeds can accomplish in this country with education in a few short years with the right mentality and work ethic when given access to opportunity that other countries don’t provide. Which excuses would you like to give to those who grow up speaking English, go to English schools and still can’t make it? Look at the examples around them – parents, communities, role models. Nepotism and ineptitude are not the examples they should see in leadership, yet that is what you are advocating for DeKalb to keep from Brazil.

We are fundamentally fighting for DeKalb’s ability to provide a solvent public educational system for ALL STUDENTS. I was impressed by several of the APPOINTED State BOE members and would like to see DeKalb get SOME qualified people.

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
1:20 pm

“Which excuses would you like to give to those who grow up speaking English, go to English schools and still can’t make it? Look at the examples around them – parents, communities, role models.”

@ LOGIC: How can I respond to your line of “reasoning”? I am just advocating a respect for the democratic process. It appears that you have opted for an “appointed” process. Why would you expect me to give an excuse for anyone, much less the type of parents whom you are apparently describing? Is it my responsibility to give an “excuse” for anyone? I think that your rambling belies your deep-seated feelilngs about certain people in DeKalb. I am sorry that you feel this way. No one’s actions are my responsibility except my own, be they in DeKalb, Newnan, or Brazil.

I just offer up my opinions about what is driving this debate about calling in outside influence groups like SACS.

LOGIC

January 18th, 2013
1:36 pm

Thanks for the giggle, Dr. Trotter. Engaging in inane discourse with you is like shooting fish in a barrel. My “rambling” does show my deep-seated resentment for the following:
1. People who say they advocate for “All of DeKalb’s Children” and are only using the system as an employment pipeline and are fundamentally corrupt on several levels
2. DeKalb residents and those who don’t contribute to our tax base and our community who say that DeKalb “whites” are unhappy with the DeKalb “blacks” when we are the most diverse county with some of the highest performing schools in the state. Those of us who live here know that it is diverse throughout the county. Look at the numbers.
3. People who are happy to sacrifice the future of DeKalb’s children even though the electoral process at this local level does not have a proper remediation plan when elected officials are INCAPABLE of executing their elected duties, even with years of training. Even the President is subject to impeachment.

I respect your family history and really wonder why you would leave DeKalb which such a wonderful rich history. The fact that my family has been here for so long is the main reason I would like to build upon the legacy.

Please spare DeKalb your comments because they are not helping our children nor do they highlight the real issues as to why we are where we are. The number of people at the hearing and those who watched the webcast from all parts of the county show that we as an entire county are coming together for the sake of our communities and our children.

Disgusted

January 18th, 2013
1:41 pm

It seems obvious that after listening to the statements of the board members and questioning them, the state board members knew there was no hope of any improvement coming from this crew (Nancy Jester and the three new board members excluded). They seemed to only be concerned with protecting themselves when the inevitable taxpayer-funded lawsuit occurs. Perhaps the board should try a hail mary and fire Dr. Atkinson, whom they shouldn’t have hired in the first place.

By the way, I’m bothered that the plagiarism incident seems to be old news so soon after it was made public. If the board instructed Dr. Atkinson to fire Dr. Taylor (by the way, does anyone know where his doctorate is from?), would that be viewed as meddling in personnel matters by SACS?

And AMG, we would have to improve a whole lot to get to “mediocre.”

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
1:53 pm

Well, LOGIC, I won’t “spare” you of my comments. We live in a country rich with freedom of speech and press. I like to write and to offer up my comments, despite whom I might offend. Sometimes I even intend to offend. Ha!

I am happy that DeKalb is rich in diversity. The school board is also diverse, right?

Why my ancestors left DeKalb? My great, great grandfather was murdered, and my great grandmother married a physician, Dr. Robert W. Trotter, and the family moved to the quaint town of Madison, Georgia to raise the five children. Other relatives stayed in DeKalb. In fact, I remember as a kid visiting my great aunt who lived in Avondale Estates.

I am happy to provide you shooting practice, by the way. I have never been compared to a Goldfish. I take that this was supposed to be an insult. Usually I am compared to much more heinous creatures. Ha!

I see that you make very broad and sweeping comments about the school board not carrying out their elective duties. What laws have they violated, if you don’t mind me asking?

marm

January 18th, 2013
2:06 pm

@sandyspringsparent: You obviously don’t know people who live around Druid Hills HS (it’s not NORTH Druid Hills HS by the way).

WillinRoswell

January 18th, 2013
2:15 pm

Let’s hope not.

Returning DCSS Parent

January 18th, 2013
2:21 pm

I don’t believe any significant changes can happen in 30 days. However, I am also concerned with who will replace the board members if they are let go. What are their backgrounds? Are they even qualified to be on the board or are they politically connected? Too many questions that are unanswered at this point. I do hope the board realizes it is time for a change and at least are wise enough to make an attempt to implement the requested changes by SACS. I kept my son out of DCSS for years because of these issues. Now he is attending Arabia Mountain HS and doing very well. I would really hate to have to go back to sending him to a private school and continuing to pay a large amount of my property taxes for the public schools. I should not have to pay for private school and public school. I have no intention of moving my family to another district because DCSB can’t get their act together. I think giving them until the end of the school year would make sense. If things have not improved by then, everyone including the superintendent should go and start fresh. If it means students will start and end the school year a little later, it is worth it. Our kids are worth the effort and deserve a quality education no matter what part of DeKalb they reside in.

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
2:23 pm

Oh, good heavens. This race argument is ridiculous. SACS isn’t here because of race; they are actually about five years overdue for actual, tangible violations and problems. Why aren’t they at all of the other places you mentioned? I don’t know, and I don’t care. All I care about is that finally some big-time attention is being paid to DCSD. If it begins with SACS, fine. If it began with the DA, that would have been fine, too. Whatever it takes. Pull them over for a broken tailight and discover a gun hidden under the front seat. SACS saw the broken tailight, an overall insignificant piece of the problem but a firestarter nonetheless.

Who else felt vindicated to see our school board members uncomfortable and moderately deferential? I enjoyed every second of it. They all showed their true colors. I can only hope the state board was even more shocked. We’re used to it; I wonder what they thought about the two sleeping board members (Walker and Cunningham) and the one who couldn’t hold her head up at the podium (Copelin-Wood), not to mention the couple of board members who can’t string together a coherent sentence.

This is what we have been dealing with for years, and if I hear one more person say, “just elect new people”, I will lose it. No amount of campaigning will have this central DeKalb resident having any success in deep south DeKalb trying to get them a decent candidate. Those are just the facts. The involved areas are turning over members. The other areas aren’t, and they are still in the majority.

Who says a board needs to be an elected group anyway? Maybe we should permanently shift to an appointed board and see how that works? There are politics in elections as much as in appointments. It’s not like they are going down the DMV and picking out 9 random citizens. Really, anything is better than we have now.

I am crossing my fingers that what the state BOE is doing now is crossing their t’s and dotting their i’s to ensure any legal action brought by the DeKalb BOE (and paid for by us) will not hold up after they recommend removal.

Disgusted

January 18th, 2013
2:42 pm

One of the things that struck me while watching and listening yesterday was how several of our board members struggled with language. They not only had trouble communicating their thoughts, they seemed to have trouble grasping the ideas communicated by SACS and by the state board members. This must be a huge handicap when trying to fulfill the responsibilities of a board member. Dekalb has many challenges, including a large population of students from low-income households, immigrant households,and households with low levels of education. We don’t need to be handicapped by school board members who can’t communicate adequately, much less effectively.

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
2:49 pm

“SACS isn’t here because of race; they are actually about five years overdue for actual, tangible violations and problems.”

Now “The Deal,” what actually are these “violaitons”? Are they criminal in nature? Or, do they merely violate SACS’s desire for school board members to act “collaboratively”? Maybe the school board didn’t hold hands long enough and sing enough nursery rhymes. By this same SACS “standard” (that, by the way, isn’t applied in Cobb County where they fight like heck over such inane matters as school calendars), perhaps we ought to also disband the U. S. Congress, the Georgia General Assembly, the Chamblee City Council, etc. These bodies also engage in lively and rigorous debates.

By the way, can’t Mark Elgart see the “taillights” in Cobb, Gwinnett, and Fulton too? Yes, do an old Terry v. Ohio stop on them too!

Just what has made this current school board so much worse than the DeKalb School Board, say, of six or seven years ago? I haven’t noitce any big difference. I notice that that the DeKalb Administration doesn’t always like to follow the Georgia Statutes governing schools. But, hey, if the school board members question the administration about this, then they get in more trouble with the hallowed and holy Mark Elgart, the great self-appointed Zeus of Education in Georgia. Nah, the only difference that I have noticed is the hue of the majority of the school board members’ skin color. When the majority of the members’ hue was lighter, then, hey, no problem. But, when the school board got darker, well, well, well. Here came the problems with SACS.

It’s fun to tell the truth, and it’s real fun when the hit dog squeals! Ha!

LOGIC

January 18th, 2013
2:50 pm

@ Dr. Trotter

I have not said that they have broken laws, even though it seems evident that laws have been broken. Just look at Grand Jury presentments to see the breaking of the laws. I have said that they cannot execute their duties for which they were elected.

Soooo…look at the SACS report to see where they did not execute their duties. How I enjoyed typing those words.

Have a wonderful and blessed weekend down in Brazil and let those of us here in DeKalb worry about our communities.

Bill & Ed's Excellent Adventure

January 18th, 2013
3:06 pm

This week has been insane — first, I agreed with concernedmom’29, then, I agreed with Dunwoody mom. And, NOW, I agree with @The Deal. Unbelievable.

Bill & Ed's Excellent Adventure

January 18th, 2013
3:10 pm

@concernedmom30329 I’m pretty sure that the reason we’ve come to this point is because parents have “demanded more.”

Dunwoody Mom

January 18th, 2013
3:11 pm

No, Bill & Ed’s it’s not too unbelievable. While, we may have different views of how to get there, I really believe our goals are the same – quality education for every student in this school district. It’s time now to start anew and see if we can do it – ALL of us.

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
3:12 pm

@ LOGIC: I didn’t think that they had broken any laws. You just don’t like them and the way they operate, right? SACS is a joke. I’ve read one too many SACS reports already. Full of errors and terribly written. You would think that someone making around $400,000.00 in salary and benefits from public monies would hire someone who could write decently and cogently, if Mark Elgart himself can’t write so well.

SACS is just an end run. Get SACS to say that the board is “deficient,” not upholding the fake “standards” of SACS, standards, by the way, which are egregiously applied in the most arbitrary, inconsistent, and capricious manner. SACS? I still say that it stands for Still Advocating for Cronies and Superintendents.

I will have a good evening (almost 6:00 PM down here). Thank you. Plan on watching the fourth and final night of the story of Luiz Gonzaga. A great story, by the way, of an unlikely musical legend here in Brazil. Then, tomorrow I may head on over to Copa to join some American friends from St. Louis who are down for a wedding. Lawrence wll finally tie the knot with Deborah from Brasilia but not before a fun vacation with the St. Louis Gang in Rio. Of course, I’ll have to join Americans watching the Falcons-49ers game at Blue Agave, owned by Jason of California.

Don’t put your hope in SACS, good folks. SACS is a false god. SACS is like BAAL that the Israelites were often tempted to worship…instead of Jehovah. Didn’t Elijah call down fire from Heaven? Or, was that his mentee-prophet Elishah? I get these two prophets confused sometimes. Their names sound so much the same. All of those Old Testament prophets were considered crazy as bed bugs by the people of their day, especially that Jeremiah! Didn’t the Good Master query those in his day: “Which of the prophets did your forefathers not stone?”

Pardon My Blog

January 18th, 2013
3:20 pm

This all comes back to the argument of setting qualifications for an individual to qualify to run for a position on the Board in the first place. What we don’t need are individuals on the Board with felony convictions, no business or practical experience, etc.

This is not about race, this is not about one area better than the other, this about giving all students a quality education.

Dr. Trotter, perhaps your time would be better served with suggestions of positive solutions instead of trying to cause discourse and division like someone else we know.

DeKalb Inside Out

January 18th, 2013
3:21 pm

Qualifications
In response to a proposal that educated people run the country, William F. Buckley said I’d rather be governed by the first 100 names in the Boston phone book.

Credentials don’t equate to results. Look at the resumes of the DCSD board over the last few years:

Paul Womack – Bachelors from UGA, VP of Trailways, President of Georgia Courier, VP of First Financial Group (Fortune 400)
Bowen – BS Accounting, Attorney and CPA, Director of U.S. Transaction with Hewlett Packard, JD from Georgia State University, College of Law
Redovian – BA degree in Finance from Ohio University, President and Owner of Atlantic Southern Products

That’s the first three I looked up. They sucked and would be way above any bar we set.

Pardon My Blog

January 18th, 2013
3:23 pm

@ Dr. Trotter – Eugene Walker, to name one, has a criminal background.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
3:23 pm

If they haven’t broken any laws, then the law is not sufficient to govern operation of school districts; the law should be more specific. This may be the real core of what is going on.

“You must take the horse to water once a day or you go to jail.”
“I didn’t take the horse to water.”
“Well then, you go to jail.”
“I’ll take the horse to water.”

Pardon My Blog

January 18th, 2013
3:25 pm

@ Dr. Trotter – I think you would be surprised at the backgrounds of some of the Board members. Start with Eugene Walker, I know he thinks people have forgotten some of his past discretiions.

bu2

January 18th, 2013
3:29 pm

@Pardon My Blog
Can you give examples? I think you may be confusing Walker with Cunningham.

dekalbite@Dr. Trotter

January 18th, 2013
3:34 pm

I’m amazed that you understand so little about the way DCSS works that you would compare its problems with Cobb, Fulton, Gwinnett, etc.

One main difference in DCSS and Cobb, Fulton, Gwinnett, etc. is the difference in achievement. If DCSS was achieving at the same rate as those systems, there would be much less outrage. People do not bypass moving into a school system because it has a good student achievement rate. Nor do property values fall as fast and deep in areas where there is a good student achievement rate.

Another difference is that DeKalb is so unequal in its educational offerings from school to school. Have you been in Fernbank or Vanderlyn and then been in some of the poorer Title 1 schools in South or North DeKalb? Not as a protestor or visitor, but in the classrooms working and/or observing.

If you are a student at Fernbank you receive Spanish as a foreign language, yoga classes, and an extra science teacher to do experiments and hands-on science, just to name a few. If you go to Vanderlyn and Austin, you have a plethora of technology funded mainly by the PTA and a number of fulltime teachers of gifted. Now go to one of the Title 1 schools and you will find their Title 1 funds spent for highly paid non teaching Instructional Data Coaches who have data clerks assigned to them so they can collect the “student data”. Watch the students as teachers use expensive and non proven scripted learning programs paid for by the Title 1 funds. Ask those teachers in those Title 1 schools about the utter absence of collaboration between the Central Office and the teachers who should be consulted about what works best for their students. Does this sound like a level playing field? The inequities in educational offerings in DeKalb is a dramatic difference between DeKalb and the systems you cite.

For example, if you go to school in Gwinnett, there will be differences in the make-up of the student body from school to school, some come from affluent areas and some come from low income homes. But the educational experience is similar. Art, music, PE, etc. are not choices for some and not for others. Students’ access to technology found in one school is almost identical from one school to the next. That is to say, the degree of standardization is predictable from school to school. That is so untrue in DeKalb. This makes for a very fractious and fractured school system. In other words, the educational foundation is broken in DeKalb, we do not have a uniformly affluent population to provide the scaffolding for our students, and Title 1 funds are not spent in a manner that would bridge the gap.

IMHO – when a school system has such a fractured foundation as DeKalb and cannot operate for the good of students (i.e. provide them with equitable opportunities for increased student achievement), an outside entity may be the only hope for reform.

bu2

January 18th, 2013
3:34 pm

And Disgusted’s comments apply to Nancy Jester and Eugene Walker, as far as comprehending the issues. Both are intelligent, well educated people who don’t seem to grasp criticism when it relates to them.

DeKalb Inside Out

January 18th, 2013
3:36 pm

Let’s clear something up:

1. SACS report is a load of crap. Please cite one example in the SACS report that is accurate and relevant.
2. The ONLY reason SACS is in here is to provide cover for Dr Atkinson and the administration.

Let’s discuss for the limited time we have left at the office on a Friday.

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
3:42 pm

@Bill and Ed, ha! A broken clock is correct twice a day? ;-) I guess anything is possible when we’re discussing DeKalb County, right?

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
3:56 pm

@DIO, why do you care if the SACS report is crap or not? I personally don’t think it is. Do I think it’s complete? No. Do I even think DCSD should be contracting with SACS? No. But am I glad it’s shedding light on DCSD? Most definitely.

Things that I believe are factual in the SACS report, through personal observation or experience:

Board members meddle in student assignment.
Board practice does not demonstrate proper fiscal management.
HR practices are not clearly communicated or published.
Not focused on academic improvement
Lacks a culture of collaboration
Culture of fear
Persistent communication problem with no operational plan
No documentation on how system hires competent support staff
Committese send a message of ownership of those areas.
Textbooks were not ready on Day 1.
Legal fees are taking money needed for classrooms.
The system is failing to meet the needs of students and staff.
The system has failed to provide proper technology infrastructure.

Do you disagree with any of these?

Dr. John Trotter

January 18th, 2013
3:57 pm

@ Pardon: I believe that I asked about criminal actions on the school board. Heck, I have been falsely arrested and incarcerated on four occasions. Hence, my little respect for “authority,” much less any jackleg gorup like SACS. Charges against me are summarily dropped due to lack of evidence. One time a hardheaded prosecutor just “dead-docketed” the file. Pretty much the same difference. I was waiting with baited breath to go to court. Ha! Now that would have been a show…but not before the illustrious depositions. Anyone who knows me knows that depositions would have been my thing in this crazy case of a principal having me arrested in APS.. With all the cheating going on at the time, no wonder they were scared of me! Ha!

Yes, I think that you might confused Dr. Walker with Mr. Cunningham, for that matter.

by the way, I might be inclined to agree with William F. Buckley, but the telepnone book appointees would still be appointees, and I’d still want them to have to go through the rigors of a campaign.

Billy Ray

January 18th, 2013
4:00 pm

The only school these guys should be running is Clown School.

Eugene Walker during the Fernbank hearings: “Hey, baby! Now, don’t be like that! Hey, baby! Don’t just get up and walk away?” Come on back and vote! Awww, baby! Why you got to be that way?”

How much lower can DeKalb go on the professionalism scale?

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
4:01 pm

Why are election campaigns perceived to be any less political and prone to error or corruption than appointments? There’s corruption in both processes. The throat to choke in an appointment environment is the elected official who appointed them. Plus, appointed ones can be removed a lot more easily than elected ones.

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
4:07 pm

DeKalb Inside Out

January 18th, 2013
4:14 pm

The Deal
Correct … DCSD board and admin … suck, suck, suck. I’m saying

1. SACS isn’t accurately reporting any of those issues.
2. SACS didn’t swoop in for any of those reasons.

What do you like about the report or see as accurate?

DeKalb Inside Out

January 18th, 2013
4:22 pm

Dr Trotter
The rigors of a campaign amount to the only respectable bar I can think of. Credentials and experience don’t mean anything. PhD in Education, 20 years experience teaching, CPA, VP of whatever … do not equate to good elected official.

Mom with a calculator is the one knocking it out.

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
4:27 pm

DIO, what I listed above is straight from the report. I agree with everything they said that I listed there. Other things they listed as issues that I didn’t list, I don’t have personal knowledge of, but 1) that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen 2) at this point, I wouldn’t doubt anything from this group of jokers.

Is it complete? No. Does SACS have “authority” over everything that is wrong? No, but that isn’t SACS’s fault.

Again, just glad to have our board members (who are part of the problem, not all of it) on the hot seat. They literally have never been in this type of hot seat. Nice to see the tables turned.

Linda

January 18th, 2013
5:04 pm

bu2 @3:29 – here on the old DeKalb Schoolwatch blog is info on the legally checkered pasts of Walker and Cunningham: http://dekalbschoolwatch.blogspot.com/2011/02/has-tom-bowen-lost-his-mind.html

DeKalb Inside Out

January 18th, 2013
5:06 pm

The Deal
Yeah, nice to see somebody give the DCSD board the what-fer … sort of.

Back to the SACS report. The “Indicators” are what SACS is basing it’s report on.

Indicator 2.1 – Coralwood shuttle issue, Policy DJE Issue.

Indicator 2.2 – The board argues with each other. The board shows distrust in administration.

Indicator 2.3 – Board members overstepping bounds and strong arming teachers and principals (This is accurate but hardly why DCSD is where it is).

Indicator 2.4 – The use of “I” and “me” are unacceptable

etc …

You agree with this SACS report? Which indicators? Yes, DCSD board and administrators need to have their butts dragged down to the gold dome, but not because of the SACS report.

Note: Please use these sources as references: Coralwood Shuttle and Policy DJE

bu2

January 18th, 2013
5:08 pm

https:/eboard.eboardsolutions.com/AboutBoard.aspx?S=4054

Background on the returning board members. The “mom with a calculator” has a degree in economics and was an actuarial consultant. And, while I’m glad she’s on the board, her running to the press or blogs when she doesn’t get her way is part of the problem and she is oblivious to that. While she may not have started the problems, it doesn’t contribute to cooperative work.

Ray

January 18th, 2013
5:21 pm

State board member Linda Zechmann commenting on how often Orson mentions he is brand new: “Everyone needs to be aware that is not relevant to this body. We are charged to look at your board as a whole. I want to make sure you don’t belabor that point because it is meaningless to this body.”
________

This is twilight zone material. Mr. Orson and two other board members were just elected to the board — campaigning on a platform of change and ousting incumbents — and were just sworn in and started with the board LAST WEEK. Then one of the first things they must do is report to the State Board for this hearing where they are disrespected and impugned with the alleged misdeeds of their predecessors, and Ms. Zechmann tells Mr. Orson it is “meaningless” to the State Board that Orson and the other two board members just started last week. If that is not twilight zone material, I don’t know what is. No wonder it’s hard to get good people to run for school boards. But hey, at least they make a whopping $18,000 per year.

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
5:47 pm

Ray, she was just being honest. They do not have the power to pick and choose. Orson did say it, oh, about 20 times, and she was just telling him he’s barking up the wrong tree. They know there are 3 new board members. The only thing about new board members that is relevant to the state BOE is if they determine that 3 new board members seems like enough to effect change that they are looking for or if they would rather just scrap the whole board and let the Governor decide if the new ones are reappointed individually. It wasn’t personal.

bu2

January 18th, 2013
5:55 pm

But it is relevant to whether the SBOE ignores the will of the political process and disenfranchises the voters. Zechmann was as oblivious to that as Dr. Walker was to the concerns of the SBOE. Its also relevant to whether the board can make changes when 1/3 is brand new.

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
5:56 pm

DIO, the information I stated is listed UNDER the indicators as a., b., etc.

But if you want the specific numbers that I agree with, here they are: 2.1.a (student assignment), 2.1.b (fiscal management), 2.1.d (HR practices and policies), 2.2.a (dysfunctional), 2.2.b (brazenly disregarding policies, no decorum), 2.2.c (individual autonomy), 2.3.a (blurring line b/c admin and board), 2.3.b (working directly with staff), 2.3.c (disregard for proper role), 2.4.a (not united, no improvement goal), 2.4.b (no culture of collaboration), 2.4.c (culture of fear), 2.5.a (visiting schools), 2,5,b (persistent communication problems)

I listed these because I have seen them myself. The other ones I didn’t list could be true, but I didn’t see them happen myself. Are you saying that none of the above happens?

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
5:59 pm

bu2, the board is following the law. If you have a problem with the law, take it up with your legislators, not the state BOE. If your legislators voted “yes” and you don’t agree with them, then vote against them next time. If the current board decides to challenge, then so be it. The state BOE has a responsibility to act according to the allowances they are given, and, right now, that is the law. Should they just not act simply b/c they are scared they would be challenged?

Ray

January 18th, 2013
6:00 pm

The Deal: If Orson said it 20 times I’m sure it was because it was fairly surreal to him to be hauled before the State Board for some kangaroo court hearing where the likes of Linda Zecchman, a political appointee, dresses him down with snotty questions and remarks like he’s some accused felon at an arraignment. Mr. Orson has run for the school board not once, but twice, at immense expenditure of time and effort, literally pouring his soul into his campaigns, so that he might be able to effect some change for the better or make a positive impact on public schools in DeKalb County, to which he is very dedicated and his own children attend. And now Zecchman and her ilk want to toss him out before he has even had a chance to do anything?? And you say “it isn’t personal”. Try walking a mile in Mr. Orson’s and the other two new board members’ shoes before you utter such a ridiculous platitude. I would venture to say that Zecchman and the State Board didn’t want to hear that 3 of the DeKalb board members were new any more because she knows it is absolutely crazy to be even talking about removing them.

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
6:16 pm

Ah, now I understand. You’re one of Orson’s friends. It all makes sense. Orson, Jim, and Melvin all ran knowing that DeKalb was on advisement and theoretically, they were aware that the system had only declined since then, so it was at their own risk. SACS also arrived for an investigative visit in October and issued their probationary status prior to their taking an oath of office. When they took their oath of office in early January, they entered into a system they knew was on probation, didn’t they? I don’t feel sorry for them; they knew what they were getting into.

I’ll say it again since you obviously didn’t read it the first time: the state BOE only has the power to remove the entire board. As such, they need a hearing with the entire board. Are you suggesting that the state BOE hold a hearing to remove the entire sitting board while excluding three members from even giving a statement? THAT would be a kangaroo court.

If you don’t like the process, take it up with your legislators. The state BOE is only following the protocol they are required to by law.

bu2

January 18th, 2013
6:30 pm

Deal you fail to understand also. I think its colored by your understandable frustration with DCSS and your opinion that the whole board should be removed.

The SBOE can remove the whole board if it doesn’t think it will make progress. Having a lot of new members is an indication that things will be different, not necessarily better, but different. Disenfranchising voters is not something that should be done lightly.

bu2

January 18th, 2013
6:32 pm

That Zechman may have been disrespectful to the new members is not relevant. That she was disrepectful to the voters is offensive.

concernedmom30329

January 18th, 2013
6:35 pm

The Governor has the ability to put the three new board members back on an appointed board.
What I wonder is this, wouldn’t the three of them welcome the opportunity to serve with higher caliber folks? Because of the low quality of the work that Cunningham, Walker and Copelin-Woods have done for the last 6-12 years, I have to believe that whomever the Governor would appoint would be better.

Wouldn’t that help the three new board members? (For the record, while I know Marshall doesn’t want to believe this, Johnson is closely linked to Walker and to the power base of S DeKalb. He won’t be the board member Marshall thinks he will be.)

I have little sympathy for any of the three newly elected candidates. They knew what they were getting into. Jim and Marshall have been involved, attended board meetings and much more than that.

BU2 — you complaints about Jester remind me of the complaints of one of Sarah Copelin-Wood’s constituents who didn’t like that Jester had a facebook page and used it. Copelin-Wood didn’t do this and thus it wasn’t fair that Jester did. Jester is just trying to bring transparency to a messy situation. Is she over the top right now? Probably. I think she a bit frantic and overwhelmed that the system is what the system is.

With the current 9, including the new board members, nothing is going to change. (Except the votes — I suspect the Walker 5 will now be the Walker 7.) Sad for the children of DeKalb.

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
6:35 pm

bu2, I said that same thing above. The fact that the board has new members is only relevant if they think 3 new members will have a positive effect given the evidence (SACS report) that they have to work with.

But I completely disagree with your “disrespectful to voters”. The state BOE did not make the law. If anyone was disrespectful, it was your legislators. I happen to agree with it, but if you don’t, you only have your legislators to blame. The state BOE was required by law to hold the hearing. If, in their experience, they determine they want to recommend that the governor remove them, that is fully within their rights and responsibilities. Are you expecting the state BOE to either violate or ignore the law?

Take it up with your legislator, and stop blaming the state BOE. They are not the villains.

Orson, Melvin, and Jimmy Mac should be setting up chats with the Governor, since he is the only one, under the law, who can pick and choose.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
6:40 pm

This is twilight zone material. Mr. Orson and two other board members were just elected to the board

Talk about being at the wrong place at the wrong time.

at least they make a whopping $18,000 per year

Doesn’t make much sense, as if designed to attract folk who will network for ancillary recompense (prestige, political ladder stepping-stone, pay/money). Incomprehensible set-up. Is school board member position supposed to be try-out or internship for greater politics? The standard compensation does not to seem to track amount of responsibility. It’s bizarre. The whole school board system is bizarre with “let the public have a go at it” for skilled supervisory management. If IBM or Amazon.com did this, there would not be much left of them as a company.

Concernedmom30329

January 18th, 2013
7:00 pm

Bu2
Where you at the hearing? Ms. Zechman’s tone and body language indicated to me that she was simply frustrated and distressed about the situation. It wasn’t personal to Marshall.
With the exception of the three new board members, this crew has had multiple warnings and chances. Almost all of them said this was a “wake up call.” Are you kidding me?

From a previous post, I realize you are relatively new to DeKalb. You haven’t been around enough to understand that at nearly every election there are new members of the DeKalb Board. Most of them start off as good people (Womack and Walker are big exceptions.) but almost none can really be effective. It is the culture of DeKalb.

Since the selection of Crawford Lewis as superintendent, DeKalb School boards have thrived with a weak leader because they can get what they want for the schools in their districts. You have no idea, I suspect, how prevalent this behavior is, especially among the S. DeKalb Board members. (In fairness, a few years ago, there were several N. DeKalb board members who behaved the same. I won’t name names, but one’s Daddy was the superintendent years ago.)

What I believe is that a mostly appointed board, perhaps with some specific standards and qualifications, would do a better job. Keep the three newly elected members and add to them professionals with no relatives who work for the systems, day jobs, and a college or technical degree.

i will end with this — yesterday three board members fell asleep during the hearing — Cunningham (who was ill), Walker and poor Copelin-Woods.

We need a change. I am sorry you think we can wait two years to get it.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
8:27 pm

Does anyone have a flow chart to the administrative lay-out of DCS? I mean, how many bosses are there? i just don’t get it. “Board of Education” “Superintendent” and this person is “CEO.” http://tucker.patch.com/articles/dekalb-ceo-makes-statement-on-schools-system-probation Aren’t superintendent and CEO that same thing? I’m confused… It would be interesting / useful to see a diagram flow chart of administration, chain of command. I wonder if such a thing exists.

Private Citizen

January 18th, 2013
8:37 pm

If you take the names and individuals out of it, it would be productive to look at organizational structure and how specific is the law defining their duties. This is public money, after all. Maybe the law needs to define the mission statement and specific duties, not generalised, and basic chain of command management structure to go with it. As the public, we should be readily able to see an organizational chart and body of law to go with it specifying duties and methods. Any activity veering from that should be address immediately per individual action. There appears to be way too much collective responsibility, lack of individual accountability, and a generalised duty/method that is open to exploit due to non-definition. The extent of the current situation is in great part due to poor definition of duties and immediate attention to individual accountability to perform duties for which salary is paid. This is pretty simple stuff and it seems to be lacking, not there. If the public or state takes so little responsibility for defining what they are paying for, and requiring basic individual accountability, then the expected result will be something unwoven.

DeKalb Inside Out

January 18th, 2013
8:58 pm

The Deal
Ah … I see … your list is paraphrasing the SACS report … that threw me off. In the process of paraphrasing, I think you’ve mistranslated many of their points. We can go through this at a later date. Given the Governor’s speech this week, we’ll have plenty of chances to go through SACS. Thanks for your patience with me.

GETtheCELLoutATL

January 18th, 2013
9:09 pm

concerned parent: First of all, there are quite a few people in DeKalb who are either old or ignorant or even both, but that would not justify hostility toward them, would it? I wouldn’t ordinarily waste time responding to someone who obviously does not wish to engage in intelligent dialogue, but the grammatical errors in your post were too many for me to ignore.

“Your either to old to know what wireless is or means or your just ignorant and really don’t know better.” How many errors do you see in this sentence? Surely they cannot all be attributed to typos, can they?

Perhaps we can just chalk it up to your inability to receive a quality education, in which case it isn’t completely your fault, but you really shouldn’t go around advertising your shortcomings that way.

As for the school systems that have “gone wireless” as you have put it, I would like to put the question back to you. Provide me with a single school system the size of DeKalb that has transitioned their entire system to e-books, I-Pads, cell phones – whatever you want to call it. If you would step outside your own assumptions for a moment and actually attempt to do the research yourself, you will find that there are none. There have been some smaller test markets but even they were wise enough not to try and roll out such a plan to their entire district without any solid research to prove that the investment up front is actually a wise business decision and without any evidence that it helps improve learning in any way. Regardless of the way they deliver the coursework to you, nothing will help if you do not actually read the words and try to retain the information. That’s learning. Everything else is just a distraction to getting our schools focused on education instead of obsessed with inanimate objects or new construction projects. The spending spree is about to come to an end, so it isn’t really the best time to try to be innovators. We would be better served if we just tried to see what things have worked elsewhere and then just try to do that.

Now, I’m guessing you probably do not pay property taxes here, but I do so I have a right to be concerned about how my money is being spent and, in light of the fact that teachers and school house employees are losing their jobs and classes are overcrowded, I would much prefer to see money reinvested in our own communities (plural) to help these issues that are having a negative impact on the quality of education we are able to provide the students, such as yourself. And, as much as you may enjoy using a computer that doesn’t need a power cord, there really is no educational benefit to it. Wireless is merely a method for delivery of content. Books can deliver that same content and have been for decades, so I have yet to hear how a big investment in devices makes sense, especially when they are more likely to get lost, broken, stolen or be used to play games, or cheat instead of helping kids learn like they should be doing.

With that being said, there are other big issue about wireless when it pertains to children, that is if you are talking about routers placed inside the school buildings that would allow any device, including personal devices and school issued ones, to access the school system’s fiber optic network, which was paid for with SPLOST III dollars, without a physical cable.

But, you do not have to take my “old” or “ignorant” word for it. Please, check out any of the links below and read the very recent statements that have been made by the EPA, FDA and even the American Pediatric Association. They are all very reputable groups in the U.S. that have released statements urging schools to remain on wired networks due to the potential health effects in children which include difficulties with concentrating as well as trouble sleeping.

It’s fine if you want to take these kinds of risks for yourself, but an entire school district should be a little more cautious when they are making blanket decisions that will affect thousands of children. Even if they believe the science is not certain, they still have an obligation to err on the side of caution. You cannot force all children to go to school and then fail to provide them a safe environment in which to do so, unless you are Communist, I guess.

The 2012 BioInitiative Report

The Report is the work of 29 independent scientists and health experts from 10 countries. The independent research group Powerwatch says of the Reports contributors “they hold 10 medical degrees (MDs), 21 PhDs, and three MSc, MA or MPHs. Among the authors are three former presidents of the Bioelectromagnetics Society, and five full members of BEMS. One distinguished author is the Chair of the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation. Another is a Senior Advisor to the European Environmental Agency.”

One of the Report’s contributors, M. Herbert, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School comments: ” While we aggressively investigate the links between autism disorders and wireless technologies, we should minimize wireless and EMF exposures for people with autism disorders, children of all ages, people planning a baby, and during pregnancy.”

Now, I know I’m no assistant professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School, but I am a parent and I have a lot more faith in the report from these folks than I do in the information the DeKalb Board of Education is using to base their decisions on, which is probably nothing more than the information given to them by the vendors that the Superintendent is getting her kickback money from. I’m not saying that is going on for sure, but she sure is happy holding up a “Netbook” which is a poor quality Chineese knock off product from Lenovo, a company that took customer service jobs out of Atlanta a few years ago to move them over to a town near Charlotte, NC, Dr. Atkinson’s former school district.

And, if you like playing games and are excited about getting a school system cheap laptop, think again about what else they can do with it. They have already said the computers will have tracking devices in them and they will probably be able to read all your emails and text messages, too. If you like being watched or tracked, then good for you. I’d rather keep my rights to privacy, free speech and protect my child’s health and education while hoping my tax dollars will be used to pay for products or jobs in my own county or state instead of being sent to other areas or other countries.

But, that’s just me. What do I know, right? Here are just a couple links for now:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/120379327/Safe-Schools-2012-Wireless-Iniative
http://www2.aap.org/visit/cmte16.htm

The Deal

January 18th, 2013
9:27 pm

@Private Citizen, many people have requested an org chart with names from the school system, but they claim they do not have the technology to produce it. There is a generic org chart on the website, but there are no names, and it only goes down so far.

I presume you have already figured this out, but the CEO is the county CEO, not just the school system.

@ DIO, honestly, SACS could have written them up for picking their noses, and I would have been okay with that, so we don’t need to worry about the semantics. :-) I despise this board and everything they have done (or not done) for our schools, including, but not limited to, hiring a horrendous superintendent. I do not think 3 new members will make a difference, but I wouldn’t freak out if they were reappointed, either. I don’t think the others have any place on a $1B board. Normally I would also vigorously defend Nancy Jester, but I didn’t appreciate the free pass she gave Atkinson and the CFO. I don’t have a problem with an appointed board, and I appreciate the tough questions from the state BOE. I accept that there is the possibility of corruption and politics in an appointed board, but I am more comfortable with the possible unknown than I am with the known idiots we have now.

I have now wasted half of my child’s education in limbo waiting for something positive to happen with this system. I am embarrassed that I didn’t see the writing on the wall sooner. Now anything that happens is going to harm my child. Staying in the DeKalb public schools will harm her. Moving to a private school will harm her, as we don’t really have the money for that. Moving her away from good friends and established activities will harm her. We really are stuck between a rock and a hard place, and there are tens of thousands more just like us.

Replacing a few board members and then working for months on new policies and ideas is like using a dustbuster in a hoarder’s house. It will never get to the heart of the problem unless there is a fresh start.

dekalbite@bu2

January 18th, 2013
9:33 pm

“The “mom with a calculator” has a degree in economics and was an actuarial consultant.”

So being ignorant of financial matters – i.e. not being able to read an income statement or a balance sheet excuses BOE members from culpability. Shouldn’t Dr. Lewis and subsequently Ms. Tyson been able to understand basic financial management? Why was Dr. Lewis paid close to half a million dollars in salary and benefits and Ms. Tyson paid $300,000+ in salary and benefits if they were so woefully ignorant of accounting principles? After all the BOE hired them. Are we to excuse all of the administrators (superintendents and BOE) who ran a billion dollar a year enterprise into the ground while utterly failing to deliver the one product they absolutely were supposed to deliver – student achievement. If you can’t understand basic accounting principles, why would you take on a job that requires those skills in order to make your organization successful?

Ray

January 18th, 2013
10:16 pm

The Deal: Wasn’t the DeKalb school board election last July? Way before the SACS “investigative visit” in October, and placing DeKalb on probation in December? So what were the three new board members supposed to do in your mind — not run for school board and try to help improve things because they should have known SACS may have put the board on probation between the election date and the date the new board members took office?

And with regard to the lovely statute that the State BOE is operating under, I suppose you would say that no one should bother running for a troubled school board and try to improve it from within or through the democratic process because the State BOE might just remove the entire board — is that it? Yeah, that sounds great. Again, no wonder it’s so hard to get good people to run for school board.

@ray

January 18th, 2013
10:45 pm

Ray
The system was headed towards probation before the election. DCSS was already on advisement. While I can’t speak about Dr Johnson, I know that Jim and Marshall knew what they were getting onto.
If Don had been reelected, I imagine you would be first in.line to call for the board’s removal.
The Governor can and probably will.keep the newly elected board members.

Disgusted

January 18th, 2013
11:56 pm

“I am more comfortable with the possible unknown than I am with the known idiots we have now.” I agree with The Deal. And this is why so many of us supported the charter amendment.

Private Citizen

January 19th, 2013
10:10 am

Your either to old to know what wireless is or means or your just ignorant and really don’t know better.” How many errors do you see in this sentence? Surely they cannot all be attributed to typos, can they?

Just one error involving the contraction: you + are = you’re.

Private Citizen

January 19th, 2013
10:11 am

Commas are over rated and difficult to use, and per rules of grammar are used differently in English in different countries.

Private Citizen

January 19th, 2013
10:23 am

The Deal, thank you.

GETtheCELLoutATL Don’t forget about the mother of all cell phone towers located on South Moreland Ave approaching I-285. You drive past that thing and your cell phone signal strength is at 50 BARS!!!

Plenty of city have wireless for the whole city. It’s called “muni-wifi” (municipal wi-fi) and is useful for police and EMS as well as the general public. The places where they don’t have it is because the wireless service providers go crying because it destroys their market. For example, I know some very poor people who are paying $190./month for 2 phones for a little internet connection and phone service. Meanwhile, some very rich cities, each person pays $5./month and you have muni-wifi. USA has really high connectivity cost related to other developed countries.

Wi-fi in schools? The cost is absolutely minimal, since it is a closed system, just using wireless routers. Actually, it would cost a whole less less than running wired connection. Health risk? I took some interest related to bee colony collapse but I think it has more to do with pesticides than rf – radio frequency.

Private Citizen

January 19th, 2013
10:32 am

The Deal, http://www.dekalb.k12.ga.us/www/documents/organizational-chart.pdf

Anybody want to pencil in salaries to go with each box, use a highlighter to note the salaries over $100k, and then scan it and put it online as a .pdf?

bootney farnsworth

January 19th, 2013
10:40 am

anyone who thinks race doesn’t play a factor in this mess is fooling themselves. and for the most part must not be long term residents to the area. those of us to have been here 30+ years have watched this farce play out in slow motion.

it probably doesn’t play out on the simple yes or no world so many try to live in, but it -race- is the underlying factor of EVERYTHING in Atlanta politics.

back in the late 70s and early 80s, signs exhorting votes to “vote the black slate” were common in parts of DeKalb county. and our current idiot mayor Reed all but said in so many words to vote for him to keep the white woman out of office.

a perfect example is the last POTUS election. it was common to say race played a part in white people voting for Romney, since they went for him about 60-40. nothing was said about black people going roughly 90-10 for Obama.

selective outrage, selective vision.

at the political level, race is the undermining issue of all things in DeKalb county. deal with it.

bootney farnsworth

January 19th, 2013
10:48 am

and there is NO WAY a system this flawed can be fixed in just 30 days. it’ll take a good six months to uncover the first tier of problems

what the state did was breathtakingly brilliant politics. and oddly enough the exact sort of thing many of us have railed against here for years. nebulous, non definable goals were set in a impossible time frame. by turning this into a “what is art” kind of question, they can reach any conclusion they want no matter what DCSS does.

all this was was a dog and pony show to cover their collective behinds. most likely the decision was made the moment the state was forced to get involved. and the decision almost certainly will be to lop politically expendable heads.

bootney farnsworth

January 19th, 2013
10:50 am

anyone who’s been here long enough will remember Andy Young, when in a pinch, resorting to saying the problem were the (his words, not mine) Smart Assed White Boys.

Private Citizen

January 19th, 2013
11:22 am

bootney, This guy reminds me of Andrew Young, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhrBDcQq2DM , but where Young, born in New Orleans and did that southern divinity degree thing and then worked to better Atlanta, Africa, and Caribbean, Haddaway is actually from Trinidad and his father is German, so he moved from Trinidad to europe and exploited the pop market as a singer. Point is I think they have very different views about society and power, Haddaway being the more multi-dimensional egalitarian.

Young has several books by or about him.
An Easy Burden: The Civil Rights Movement and the Transformation of America. (January 1998)
A Way Out of No Way. (June 1996)
Andrew Young at the United Nations. (January 1978)
Andrew Young, Remembrance & Homage. (January 1978)
The History of the Civil Rights Movement. (9 volumes) (September 1990)
Trespassing Ghost: A Critical Study of Andrew Young. (January 1978)
Walk in My Shoes: Conversations between a Civil Rights Legend and his Godson on the Journey Ahead with Kabir Sehgal. (May 2010)

Some of Haddaway’s songs:
Catch a Fire
Fly Away
I Miss You
Life
Rock My Heart
Stir It Up
What Is Love

Private Citizen

January 19th, 2013
11:35 am

Hey Bootney, What do you get when two brothers who run a gym in London start playing with writing lyrics at the front counter of the gym and decide to make a song? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39YUXIKrOFk

Name One

January 19th, 2013
3:39 pm

Jay Cunningham is a convicted felon. Walker had multiple sexual harassment lawsuits against him. High character people.

bu2

January 19th, 2013
3:39 pm

@dekalbite
I was referring to the way DIO was calling Jester a simple Mom with a calculator, when in fact she was financially savvy. Its rather misleading and insulting to others for Jester to call herself that.

Board members should be competent. Its unbelievable to me that Ms. Copelin-Woods spent 10 minutes of the board time not understanding, after 12 years on the board and 12 years of budgeting, the difference between a negative fund balance and a negative cash balance. She still didn’t grasp it, but the CFO manage to assuage her concerns about there being a negative cash balance. Its unacceptable that noone seemed to realize Tyson was ignoring the budget.

I want to see a lot of these people gone. But so do people from 5 of the 7 districts. The democratic process should be respected.

bu2

January 19th, 2013
3:40 pm

If there’s no progress by May, then I would say, yes, its time to pull the plug. But the newer people and the citizens should be given a chance.

Dekalbite@bu2

January 19th, 2013
6:33 pm

“I want to see a lot of these people gone. But so do people from 5 of the 7 districts. The democratic process should be respected.”

I like my rep Jim McMahon as well, but if the entire BOE has to go, then that is part of the democratic process. I’m a liberal Democrat but I abide by the laws this conservative legislature passes. Replacing the BOE is the Governor’s prerogative by law if their accreditation is a a certain level. That’s democracy in action too. Although we can pick and choose which laws we agree or disagree with, we don’t get to pick and choose which laws we follow.

bu2

January 19th, 2013
10:20 pm

As you said, its his perogative, not an obligation. If you had the same 9 people getting re-elected, that should impact the decision whether to remove them all or give them more time.

The way things work in this state (corruption whether its run by white, black, Democratic or Republican politicians), I don’t have any faith in the type of people who would be on an appointed board. And as a voter, you would have no say. I also don’t have faith that Atkinson is competent enough to run this district. I see an appointed board deferring to her even more than the past boards have. We’re stuck with her either way. Changing superintendents before accreditation is restored is asking for chaos and a loss of accreditation. But she needs to improve the way she does things.

I believe the newer people will change things for the better. Enough? Maybe, maybe not. For those who say the county is the problem, an appointed board does nothing to solve that. It merely defers the problems until accreditation is restored. And then the motivation for political change is reduced.

bootney farnsworth

January 20th, 2013
7:47 am

@bu

the citizens have had multiple chances to fix this and they chose to return the same or similar set of fools. frankly the citizens of DeKalb are the main problem here – they have chosen to say this is OK with them.

essentially the DCSS mess is a result of mob rule. and our republic is designed to protect us from mobs.

bu2

January 20th, 2013
9:40 am

Zepora-Roberts is gone, replaced by a CPA with a school age child (who I believe is in DCSS).
Womack, who was something of a curmudgeon and probably was one of those intervening in the schools is gone. His replacement is in the mortgage loan business and has children in the district.
McChesney, who wrote the e-mail that he would hold a meeting without women to get the emotion out (obviously lacking in common sense and competence to actually put that in an e-mail), got replaced by an attorney with children in the district.
Redovian got replaced by an actuarial consultant with children in the district.

We’ve got qualified people with a serious stake in the success of the district. I don’t see that as the same or similar set of fools.

Walker and Speaks, 2 of the returnees, have Phds. Walker’s is from Duke. Speak’s is from Sarasota, but her undergrads are from Boston U. and Northeastern.

@bu2

January 20th, 2013
2:12 pm

Gene Walker may have a PhD, but he is indefensible.

Here are some headlines about Gene from Access North Georgia:

Parole board member on trial for sexual harassment

State paid $190,000 to settle earlier sex harassment suit

Streat’s lawyers file another motion on AG
Lawyers for Sen. Van Streat are seeking “detailed affidavits” from Attorney General Thurbert Baker and two others they accuse of conspiring to destroy official records.

Suit accuses parole board member of sexual harassment

Walker was also a state legislator who stepped down after four terms, alledgely asked by the leaders of the State Democratic Party.

And this is great from Gene:
“CrossRoadsNews – DeKalb state senators question School Board members”
Henson asked about alleged misappropriation of $12 million in textbook funds. Walker said an audit by KPMG accounted for all funds and blamed allegations on rumors by disgruntled parents or employees.

Betsy Parks

January 20th, 2013
2:24 pm

Sheriff Brown on DKBOE & CEO “This is just a little hiccup.” Well… NOT TO US! WE hope the outrage spreads fast! Sign and Share until the DKBOE is replaced!
http://www.change.org/petitions/governor-nathan-deal-and-georgia-state-board-of-education-review-sacs-findings-if-accurate-replace-the-dekalb-county-school-board

The Deal

January 20th, 2013
3:33 pm

bu2, are you kidding? Donna Edler is an idiot. Melvin Johnson is an insider. You can try to make it sound better than it is, but we all know the facts.

bootney farnsworth

January 20th, 2013
3:49 pm

BTW: its not just DCSS which is corrupt, but the whole of DeKalb management from schools to sewage. the whole damn county is rotting. or rotten, if you prefer the past tense

bu2

January 20th, 2013
5:38 pm

@@not defending Dr. Walker’s performance, just challenging the comment calling him a fool.

@the Deal We all know your OPINIONS. But since Donna Elder got a BBA at Kansas and Master’s at Wisconsin and is a CPA, I don’t believe she is an idiot. Is she always well prepared for board meetings? No. But she’s not an idiot.

I will agree there are two people who are unqualfied to be on the board. And there are others I wish weren’t there, but they aren’t fools and idiots.

bu2

January 20th, 2013
5:43 pm

@bootney
I hope you don’t live in Gwinnet or Fulton or Clayton. Otherwise its kind of like the pot calling the kettle black.

And the garbage service actually is one of the things that works here. Its really quite a beautiful county. Just drive from paved over Fulton to forested Dekalb along streets like Ponce de Leon, La Vista and Freedom Parkway. Or head into Brookhaven from Peachtree. Its quite refreshing. As much as Perimeter Mall is a pain to navigate, its a lot more attractive than the Lennox/Phipps area.

Taxpayer and Teacher

January 20th, 2013
6:26 pm

What is the concentration area of Walker’s Ph.D, Physical Education? And sexual harrassment(EWWW!) Sarasota? is that the program that allows you to do your defense on the phone? This is a joke! Counting down til school is out…4, 3, 2, 1!!!!!Yaaaaay! Free at last…No racial epithet intended…

concernedmom30329

January 20th, 2013
8:01 pm

@Bu2
In Walker County, the first thing their appointed board did was fire the superintendent.
http://www.wctv.tv/home/headlines/Governor-Appoints-New-School-Board-For-Miller-County-172567091.html

In our current scenario, we have a weak superintendent with a handful of strong armed board members. For the last decade or so, individual board members have used their power/influence over the superintendent (whomever that may be) to get what they wanted for their schools.

I am sorry but I don’t have confidence that this behavior won’t continue with the current board.

This is the real problem — nine (or six, if you want to argue the new board members are different) who have their own agendas and virtually none of those agendas are about the well being of the entire system.

Even Jester engaged in questionable behavior as it related to redistricting the schools a few years ago.

We need board members who can vote in a way that may make it uncomfortable with their own constituents. Do you think we have that right now?

concernedmom30329

January 20th, 2013
8:11 pm

Not Walker — Miller County Wishful thinking perhaps?

exteacher

January 20th, 2013
9:17 pm

I enjoyed the comments from THE DEAL and DEKALBITE . Dr. Trotter, I get that race is an issue and perhaps the black population does get extra grief, but you know they need to raise their own bar if they want to be taken seriously as a group. Lots of behavior that does not benefit them or earn themselves any respect needs to change, even if it seems “white.” Funny to see Fernbank on here- a lot. This is a very self involved group who could care less about any other school in the district and Orson is their shill. I have no reason to believe this guy would represent anyone else except the people who live in the Fernbank district who paid for the hundreds of yard signs that got him elected. On Gwinnett…I worked there. They have issues but it is 100 times more efficient than DK. Every school has the basics plus ART, Music,and PE. Same dumb administrators with funky degrees though. I am ready for the board to go and a thorough house cleaning at the central office which is a huge JOKE.

@concernedmom

January 20th, 2013
9:37 pm

@concernedmom,
Jester didn’t engage in questionable behavior in redistricting a few years ago. You know that. She came on the board in the middle of the process. The end result was strikingly similar to the first set of options presented by the staff to the board. The only people that had issues with it wanted to keep the 4-5 academy for their own strange demographic reasons. Everyone knows that the end results were good and we have very strong elementary schools in that cluster now. What is questionable is why the staff did nothing to address the various zones in the Cross Keys feeder pattern. They never presented one idea to make that better.

Taxpayer and Teacher

January 20th, 2013
11:23 pm

Please…I’m BLACK and I say get rid of them all. (Including MRS. Atkinson) I want to get a good return on my house when I decide to sell. Call me selfish.

Pardon My Blog

January 21st, 2013
8:58 am

@exteacher – yeah, I guess doing the right thing, abiding by the rules and law, etc. are acting “white”? The mantra seems to be do what you want and beg for forgiveness later.

bootney farnsworth

January 21st, 2013
9:28 am

@ bu

perhaps you should spend less time worrying about the failures in other counties and focus on the multitude of failures in your own.

and while I’m pleased your trash system works to your approval, its sorta pointless when you refuse to take your trash out.

The Deal

January 21st, 2013
5:24 pm

bu2, definitions:

Fool: a person lacking in judgment or prudence
Idiot: a foolish or stupid person

I think most of our board fits these definitions. But bury your head in the sand and hope for more time that our children don’t have.

bu2

January 21st, 2013
7:00 pm

@bootney & the Deal
You can both bury your head in the sand and assume the corruption that pervades this state somehow will create a good board to improve the system. I trust the voters more than the governor or the SBOE. Your path creates a lot of risk and does nothing to guarantee we don’t go back to the same place. The progress in “taking out the trash” the voters have already made gets reversed.

Concernedmom30329

January 21st, 2013
8:36 pm

bu2

I strongly believe the three newly elected board members will be reappointed. I desperately believe that the rest need to go.

You seem to think that Redovian and McChesney were horrible. They weren’t. (Womack was.) They got snookered by staff on occasion and redistricting took a terrible tole on McChesney, but unless the whole (or nearly the whole) board is acting as one, nothing is going to chage. The system is fundamentally flawed. A board member may ask a great question but the majority of the board won’t support him/her in finding the answer. Why? Because they need to protect their version of the status quo. (Be it attendance zones, new construction, certain hires, etc) This is a system that works on some strange pay back method.

I would like to think, and I am impressed with those appointed in other systems, that the Governor would look to see what was needed and appointed appropriate folks.

I know I have said this before, but you are very new to this and you live in a school district where parents can raise the funds to make up the differences from system funding shortfall. You also have said that you may be public only in elementary. For about 95,000 other students in DeKalb, their reality is very different. Every bad decision made by the system is like another little cut towards a fatal wound. Most system families don’t have options other than public k-12.

I sense your desperation to keep Marshall and the other newly elected officials. Keep in him. See how you feel about him in 2-4 years. But don’t insist on keeping everyone else.

IT ISN’T WORKING.

dekalbite@bu2

January 21st, 2013
10:21 pm

No doubt Orson is anxious to make sure the new Fernbank Elementary building goes through, but there is more to DeKalb than a school building for one community, no matter how powerful and affluent that community is.

IMHO – ALL BOE members need to go. I sense you campaigned for Orson. I campaigned very actively for and donated to the new rep that won in my district as well, and think he could do a fine job. However, it seems very divisive to keep some BOE reps and let others go. How would the governor pick and choose some over others – particularly if they have no record to review? It is better to start fresh and appoint BOE reps that represent ALL students in DeKalb, not just the narrow slice of the electorate that voted for them.

bootney farnsworth

January 22nd, 2013
7:57 am

@ bu

1- you assume much, and incorrectly. that however, is your problem.
2-I see no evidence of change, just wishful thinking on your part. history is not on your side.
3-I’ve been living/working/going to school in DeKalb for nearly 40 years. you?
4-you seem to have a serious dog in the fight about saving certain behinds. why?
5-my responses come from hard learned history, including changeover in personnel before. yours seem to be wishing on stars and reflexive defensiveness
6-no real, tangible evidence of a cultural change of the voters in DeKalb exists
7-you’ve flat run out of time.

bootney farnsworth

January 22nd, 2013
7:59 am

if the three amigos are all that, they should have little trouble retaining their seats.

DeKalb Inside Out

January 22nd, 2013
9:49 am

Replacing the board and Super for 18 months isn’t going affect permanent change. Superintendents and BOE members have come and gone over the last 10 years. 5 years from now we will be in the same place.

bu2

January 22nd, 2013
1:11 pm

I suspect the SBOE has already decided to replace all 9. And I suspect Deal will start with 9 new faces. Difficult to pick and choose. Politically impossible to only replace the 4 who have served more than 2 years.

@Bootney
2. With one meeting, you’re right. There is no evidence of change. Lots of wishful thinking that an appointed board will make more of a difference than the angry voters who have turned out people.
3. Have you considered that being here 40 years might be why you can’t see any other solution? One of the problems in Georgia is they always seem to be reinventing the wheel. Things don’t HAVE to be like this. There’s a lot of accepting that “we just can’t change things on our own.” Georgia desperately needs more people in government who have been other places and seen that things can be done differently.
4. You seem to be ignoring what I have been saying. I’ll repeat it one last time. I don’t have any faith in the state of Georgia to appoint an honest board with the interest of the taxpayers at heart. Georgia politicians might even make some Chicago and Louisiana politicians blush. I also don’t think voters should be ignored. And I have more faith in people with children in the system who have been elected by angry voters to make positive change than in appointees.
5. Yours is a defeatist reflexive response. You don’t “seem”, you are wishing on a Dues ex machina from Governor Deal.
6. 5 incumbents aren’t here any more. I’d say that’s some evidence.
7. APS got off probation with pretty much the same dysfunctional board. DCSS can as well. Of course, merely getting off probation is not all that’s necessary.

We both agree that a lot of change is necessary. I fear your change makes things worse.

bu2

January 22nd, 2013
1:31 pm

While I don’t agree with Dr. Trotter’s analysis, you can’t deny he is right about one thing. The people who have lost in elections or votes are the loudest calling for intervention to overturn the votes of the people. The more Republican areas that were behind the Jester/McChesney group are some of the shrillest.

Concernedmom30329

January 22nd, 2013
3:00 pm

Tell me what your fix is. You seem to think that we can survive two more years. I am here to tell you that we can’t.

Will it be ok when your your 4th grader has 40 kids in a class? Don’t think that can happen at Fernbank? Just watch.

Something has to give. Two years is an eternity.

DeKalb Inside Out

January 22nd, 2013
3:19 pm

ConcernedMom
Without major changes in 5 years we are destined to be in the same place we are today. We MUST have local control. Those models include Portfolio District, district wide independent charters and independent school districts. We are wasting our time and our children’s education demanding anything less than a local control model. “We” have leverage over the board and administration for the first time.

concernedmom30329

January 22nd, 2013
3:21 pm

DIO

This board isn’t going to approve anything you listed. Don’t you think Jester asked them to? (Ask her and see what she says.)
An appointed board is much more likely to be progressive and less territorial than an elected one. An appointed board for two years would be a gift.

DeKalb Inside Out

January 22nd, 2013
3:52 pm

ConcernedMom
Dr Jester can’t do it alone. She would need the help of the gold dome. They can step in like they did in APS. They can tell the administration and board to adopt a new system or get kicked out … that’s the leverage. If it’s in a consent agreement, the state will continue to have the leverage.

An appointed board is much more likely to be progressive and less territorial than an elected one. – You have high hopes for the potentially appointed board. The state will loose all leverage. If the DeKalb Delegation has any say, the board will be worse than it is now. At best we will be right back where we are in 5 years.

Kick out the DeKalb BOE
The BOE will hire topshelf lawyers to sue the state and it will get ugly. If the state wins, a bunch of white people will kick a bunch of elected black people out of office. That won’t go over well. I would expect South DeKalb to elect even more divisive BOE reps. There is no happy ending going down that path.

Please email Dr Jester and ask for her opinion. Please post it here.

Dunwoody Mom

January 22nd, 2013
6:40 pm

I keep reading about lawsuits about removing elected officials. I truly do not understand this. There are already procedures to remove elected officials – this isn’t something new. Doesn’t the word “impeachment” mean anything? We can impeach the president, governor, judges, etc., why can’t we “impeach” school boards?

DeKalb Inside Out

January 22nd, 2013
7:09 pm

Impeachment
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment
Impeachment is a formal process in which an official is accused of unlawful activity. We are more likely to recall the BOE. A recall election is usually initiated by voters and can be based on “political charges”, for example mismanagement, whereas impeachment is initiated by a constitutional body (usually a legislative body) and is usually, but not always, based on an indictable offense.

bu2

January 22nd, 2013
9:20 pm

@Dunwoody Mom
Georgia law seems to believe the elected office belongs to the elected official instead of the people. The plan for reducing the board to 5 or 7 foundered because the elected board threatened to sue saying they had a right to the position for the remaining 2 or 4 years. Dr. Walker, as I recall, was the most vocal. The consensus in the press and among the state representatives seemed to be that they would win. So its hard to get rid of people before their term is out. If the board gets removed, we still have to pay them under state law.

bu2

January 22nd, 2013
9:21 pm

I’m referring to the SBOE board removal. They will technically be suspended with pay for the next 2 years.

@bu

January 22nd, 2013
10:49 pm

Not quite right. Had the DeKalb delegation allowed the citizens to vote on the size of the board it would have triggered an election immediately after the vote. Howard Mosby, chair of the delegation wouldn’t allow us to vote. He dates Cunningham’s sister. We didn’t have to be in this position. But DeKalb is a messed up place.

The delegation missed an opportunity to do the right thing. No one Pressed Mosby to do right thing. Not Holcomb. And especially not MMO. Very disappointing.

[...] chief Cheryl Atkinson, who is already on shaky ground with her school board. (And, of course, the board itself is on shaky ground, which is why DeKalb is teetering on the brink of [...]