Ann Coulter vs. the Jesuits at Fordham: A college invite is rescinded

Pundit Ann Coulter

Pundit Ann Coulter

I have written this blog now for several years, and only mentioned acidic pundit Ann Coulter once. Three weeks later, I am bringing her up again because this incident demonstrates a sensible way to handle controversies over college speakers.

Coulter was invited to Fordham University in New York to speak on Nov. 29 by the College Republicans.

The planned appearance  triggered protests and a student petition. A group of students argued that tuition should not be used to underwrite speakers at the private college who are “not compatible with the values the Fordham community professes – particularly the Jesuit tenet of ‘Men and Women for and With Others’.”

See what you think of Fordham President Joseph M. McShane’s response and of the decision Friday night by the Fordham College Republicans to cancel Coulter’s appearance.

First, Father McShane’s statement:

The College Republicans, a student club at Fordham University, has invited Ann Coulter to speak on campus on November 29. The event is funded through student activity fees and is not open to the public nor the media. Student groups are allowed, and encouraged, to invite speakers who represent diverse, and sometimes unpopular, points of view, in keeping with the canons of academic freedom. Accordingly, the University will not block the College Republicans from hosting their speaker of choice on campus.

To say that I am disappointed with the judgment and maturity of the College Republicans, however, would be a tremendous understatement. There are many people who can speak to the conservative point of view with integrity and conviction, but Ms. Coulter is not among them. Her rhetoric is often hateful and needlessly provocative — more heat than light — and her message is aimed squarely at the darker side of our nature.

As members of a Jesuit institution, we are called upon to deal with one another with civility and compassion, not to sling mud and impugn the motives of those with whom we disagree or to engage in racial or social stereotyping. In the wake of several bias incidents last spring, I told the University community that I hold out great contempt for anyone who would intentionally inflict pain on another human being because of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or creed.

“Disgust” was the word I used to sum up my feelings about those incidents. Hate speech, name-calling, and incivility are completely at odds with the Jesuit ideals that have always guided and animated Fordham.

Still, to prohibit Ms. Coulter from speaking at Fordham would be to do greater violence to the academy, and to the Jesuit tradition of fearless and robust engagement. Preventing Ms. Coulter from speaking would counter one wrong with another. The old saw goes that the answer to bad speech is more speech. This is especially true at a university, and I fully expect our students, faculty, alumni, parents, and staff to voice their opposition, civilly and respectfully, and forcefully.

The College Republicans have unwittingly provided Fordham with a test of its character: do we abandon our ideals in the face of repugnant speech and seek to stifle Ms. Coulter’s (and the student organizers’) opinions, or do we use her appearance as an opportunity to prove that our ideas are better and our faith in the academy — and one another — stronger? We have chosen the latter course, confident in our community and in the power of decency and reason to overcome hatred and prejudice.

Joseph M. McShane, S.J., President

From the College Republicans late Friday:

The College Republicans regret the controversy surrounding our planned lecture featuring Ann Coulter. The size and severity of opposition to this event have caught us by surprise and caused us to question our decision to welcome her to Rose Hill. Looking at the concerns raised about Ms. Coulter, many of them reasonable, we have determined that some of her comments do not represent the ideals of the College Republicans and are inconsistent with both our organization’s mission and the University’s. We regret that we failed to thoroughly research her before announcing; that is our error and we do not excuse ourselves for it. Consistent with our strong disagreement with certain comments by Ms. Coulter, we have chosen to cancel the event and rescind Ms. Coulter’s invitation to speak at Fordham.

We made this choice freely before Father McShane’s email was sent out and we became aware of his feelings – had the President simply reached out to us before releasing his statement, he would have learned that the event was being cancelled. We hope the University community will forgive the College Republicans for our error and continue to allow us to serve as its main voice of the sensible, compassionate, and conservative political movement that we strive to be. We fell short of that standard this time, and we offer our sincere apologies.

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

413 comments Add your comment

Prof

November 14th, 2012
5:51 pm

Just want to point out that UGA is a public university, unlike the private Fordham University. Issues of free speech and academic freedom are involved here, unlike at Fordham.

Lexi

November 14th, 2012
6:05 pm

The issue is whether there is outrage over the use of student fees to bring this speaker onto campus.

Private Citizen

November 14th, 2012
8:05 pm

http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/bill-oreillys-phony-attacks-liberals-ov Here is a current video of one of Coulter’s media kin, Bill O’Reilly, who is scapegoating single mothers while there is no mention of the incarceration rate increasing x4 since 1980, which affects fathers and families. He is also spooking about drug legalization laws and making a lot of misinformation. In other words, he is fronting strongly for the for-profit police state and prison industries.

It is a completely dishonest propaganda presentation from a man who seems deeply imbedded with the dna of a conman, content to use his high level of education to make a carnival to result in that he is paid at the expense of the general populace. Thankfully, this particular type of showmanship seems to be running its course.

Private Citizen

November 14th, 2012
8:27 pm

Chuck D speaking to the social, political and economic issues facing urban communities

Sounds great! Despite what people think of their use of language and such, I think Ying Yang Twins from College Park should open up a media arts production charter school because they have made some superb sounding records. Atlanta is to progressive rap music, etc. what Nashville is to country music. One thing the two cities have in common is that somewhere in them are some production people who really know their stuff, way off the chart from most “indy” efforts.

Hey Lexi check this out. I really admire these artists “Remote Kontrol.” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t97VuCrjnSM They’re not rich or particularly well known but I really admire them. I think they’re based in Atlanta. If anyone has the means, colleges, etc. get them a show! I am sure they can use the support.

PS hey – this is great stuff! great track! – Public Enemy – Don’t Believe The Hype http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vQaVIoEjOM

Private Citizen

November 14th, 2012
8:35 pm

Kenny Breaz

November 14th, 2012
8:43 pm

It’s emphatically clear the Jesuits afraid of what Ann Coulter might reveal. Perhaps they fear a speaker ready to reveal the total brain-washing Jesuits have drummed into the minds of their subjects.

Private Citizen

November 14th, 2012
8:48 pm

@ Dartmouth http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5jf4fGQc2k

Very subtle, use of the “K,” a nod to the inventors of electronica http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJ8qsyA7Srg

Truth in Moderation

November 14th, 2012
10:48 pm

@PC
We agree on more than you might think. A propagandist, to be effective, must speak a volume of truth, mixed with a lie. Ann has done just that. On this blog, I honed in on the truth she MUST speak, and noted the effectiveness with which she speaks. The reasoning of those speaking against her truth, is delusional. “There is no honor amongst thieves”. In my opinion, the bloggers were stirred up by her TRUTH, not her lies.

Christopher Ward

November 15th, 2012
11:00 am

There is no such thing as free speech in any country, nor has there ever been. There are limits to free speech. Should people with completely abhorrent views be allowed to speak at prestigious universities? Let’s take an extreme example: leaders of neo-Nazi groups. Let’s invite them to speak. Why not? In the interest of free speech they should also be allowed access to podiums wherever they see fit, and if they aren’t permitted to give talks at both public and private institutions, then that’s the stifling of their free speech. Ann Coulter isn’t particularly interesting; which is the only reason one should refuse her a platform, IMO. She’s boringly provocative in the interest of selling books, making money, and promoting herself. She’s provokes instead of enlightens. She’s vulgar, and and is one of the major sources of the debasement of political discourse in today’s society. The very fact I’ve spent 10 minutes writing this proves she’s won.

Lexi

November 15th, 2012
7:42 pm

Mr Ward:
I agree that Nazis ought to be allowed to speak. If Coulter, nazis, or Black Panthers can’t attract and keep audieñces they will wither without censorship. I don’t relish the notion of any of our betters choosing which ideas we can’t hear.
Again, reason the speaker’s invitation was revoked was content, and the fact Coulter ruffles feathers is a por reason to disinvited her

Lexi

November 16th, 2012
5:42 pm

As a postscript, this just in:http://blog.cardinalnewmansociety.org/2012/11/15/fordham-to-host-infanticide-promoting-peter-singer/

“Fordham to Host Infanticide Promoting Peter Singer

Just days after Fordham University’s president Fr. Joseph McShane, S.J. determined that conservative author Ann Coulter was too “hateful and needlessly provocative” to speak on campus, the University will tomorrow [November 17, 2012]host the pro-infanticide ethicist Peter Singer to speak at a conference entitled “Conference with Peter Singer: Christians and Other Animals: Moving the Conversation Forward.”

For those unfamiliar with Singer, Joe Carter at First Things summed up Singer’s ethics this way:

Singer has spent a lifetime justifying the unjustifiable. He is the founding father of the animal liberation movement and advocates ending “the present speciesist bias against taking seriously the interests of nonhuman animals.” He is also a defender of killing the aged (if they have dementia), newborns (for almost any reason until they are two years old), necrophilia (assuming it’s consensual), and bestiality (also assuming it’s consensual).”

In a nutshell, dead people can consent to sex with Singer, and young lower animals have rights, though infants under two years don’t, but college republicans cannot invite Ann Coulter to speak because she is too “provocative.”
No content censorship there.

EliteCommInc.

November 19th, 2012
4:05 pm

I was not aware that the Jesuits at Fordham University actually sponsor events by those engaged in homosexual behaviors.

I do not think Miss Coulter is filled with hate. I think she has issues concerning blackness. But all in all Miss Coulter is a woman as bold and as brash as any male rhetorician. Sometimes she hits it on the head sometimes it a stretch and sometimes she’s all wet. She’s a feirce debator. Most sincere debator’s are feirce and uncompromising. She is also a woman who I think genuinely cares abouy her country and what she thinks is the best response to the growing permissiveness. While a single woman who professes to have a relationship with Christ. I think the College Republicans could have proffered several caveats or protocols of how she would be expected to conduct her communication. SImply pass along the expected decorum and allow Miss Coulter to decide.

Afterall, to the President’s credit he did not out an out ban the speaker he expressed his displeasure at their choice.

I would that they would have responded to Miss Coulter with same tolerance, openess, and love that they claim to espouse for men and women who openly engage in behavior anti-thetical to Catholcism, but Christ and scripture as well.

EliteCommInc.

November 19th, 2012
7:24 pm

I guess ui should add, the choice to engage in homosexual behavior is anti-thetical to Christ whether one practices it in the open or in private.