A thank-you letter to Chicago teachers from some Georgia colleagues

I have published two pieces by the Teaching Georgia Writing Collective, which is a group of educators, parents and citizens who engage in public writing and public teaching about education in Georgia. The group had its impetus in Athens and includes UGA professors.

The collective defines its goals as:  1) empowering educators to reclaim their workplace and professionalism, 2) empowering families to stand up for their children and shape the institutions their children attend each day, 3) empowering children and youth to have control over their education, and 4) enhancing the education of all Georgians.

Here is a third essay from the group:

Dear Chicago Teachers,

The Chicago Teachers Union strike will go down as a significant event in history when educators stood up against the destructive powers of privatization and for workers’ job security and a strong middle-class in the United States. We want to thank you for standing up for yourselves, for your students, for public education, and for every teacher who is faced with constant criticism and attacks on their professional dignity. Your courage to stand up, walk out, and demand national attention inspires us and makes us hopeful that your actions will have a positive impact for the working conditions of all teachers, regardless of whether they have union protection or not.

Thank you for challenging the narrow-minded vision of using high-stakes standardized test scores to evaluate student learning, teacher effectiveness, and school rankings.

Thank you for showing America and the world that most teachers do not agree with the heavy-handed policies that have narrowed curriculum and made school a less interesting and enjoyable place for most kids.

Thank you for fighting for the rights of children, youth and families to have access to fully funded public schools that aren’t destroyed by for-profit charters not held to the same level of scrutiny.

Thank you for demanding rights for laid-off teachers.

Thank you for demonstrating to everyone in our country that working conditions for teachers have been deteriorating since before NCLB and won’t be improved by Race to the Top.

Thank you for reminding workers everywhere that they have a right to stand up for injustices in their workplace.

Thank you for teaching your students – and all of us – an important lesson about democracy, labor, and the vision of public education that is handed to us by “reformers” who rarely know anything about real schools and real kids and real teaching. We should all strive to be as courageous as you.

Sincerely,

Teaching Georgia Writing Collective

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

142 comments Add your comment

Michele

September 23rd, 2012
4:06 am

Cheers for a great letter! Since the state won’t leachers have a true union in Georgia, we must sit back and rely on other teachers with unions to voice the true feelings of the teachers lost in this state. When the state becomes the problem in education, it is truly a shame that teachers have absolutely no venue in which they can address their concerns and recommendations. The state will tell you that they listen to teachers, but you must realize that the specific teachers who are even allowed to talk to state officials are those who have demonstrated to their principals that they are lock-step in support of the state’s proposals and theories. No dissent ever leaves the school. If anyone here believes that the Georgia teachers are on board with the state’s direction, they need to dig much deeper to see where all this is going.

old dude

September 23rd, 2012
6:11 am

Concise. Precise. Incisive. Well put. What can I do to support the Teaching Georgia Writing Collective?

Sissy

September 23rd, 2012
6:17 am

Georgia teachers will not see a raise until folks realize that the republicans under the gold dome do not want to fund schools one more penny. They hate public schools and would love to get their hands on TRS.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
6:34 am

what a stupid, stupid, stupid , stupid letter.

to pretend the Chicago strike was anything other than them using the leverage they had to force monetary and workplace concessions is just plain ignorant. Chicago didn’t give a damn about anything beyond their own borders or they’d still be out.

“Collective” – a term straight out of the old Soviet Union while it may be generous, I’m going to assume a “collective” of teachers knows the power or words. the use of the term “collective” brings to mind the worst fears of Joe average, and plays dead into the hands of Fran Millar and his wannabe minions

the main thing this letter says is allegedly smart people can be amazingly stupid. crap like this butt kissing piece only works against us, and undermines any gains we could have made toward some sort of protection from idiot legislatures and petty administrators.

all that piece of propaganda crap is missing are slogans for long live the revolution, use of the word “manifesto”, and Cynthia McKinney’s endorsement.

worst of all, it reads like something written by a group of pseudo intellectuals writing out stereo instructions. poorly organized and ineffective in persuasion of topic.

did you idiots send Fran Millar a card and cake to go along with this present?

so a nice, big sarcastic “thank you” to the collective for making our situation that much worse. while its true you have the right to make fools of yourselves, please remember you are not obliged to exercise said right.

idiots. and not even useful ones.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
6:41 am

@ Sissy

the only person I know of who wanted to raid TRS was (allegedly, since it has not been proven) Anthony Tricoli, one of the farthest out there leftists I’ve ever encountered.

care to try again?

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
7:34 am

“The Chicago Teachers Union strike will go down as a significant event in history when educators stood up against the destructive powers of privatization and for workers’ job security and a strong middle-class in the United States.”

Unfortunately the unions do a lousy job of shaping the debate, and end up looking like hacks who want to keep their no good gubmit job.

If they would focus on restoring DISCIPLINE, and administrative BLOAT, things that RESONATE with John Q. Public they could perhaps turn the tide of public perception.

For example if they said “We will accept the pay proposal IF you cut central office staff by ten percent; we will accept the pay proposal IF you grant us the authority to remove chronically disruptive students” you put the SYSTEM on the defensive.

But when your complaints SEEM to center around pay in this economy…

William Casey

September 23rd, 2012
7:37 am

@Bootney: I was thinking the same thing about the use of the term “Collective” in the group’s name. I was wondering when they were going to announce their “Five Year Plan” or explain their “Great Leap Forward.” The group’s name certainly detracts from their message a message which wasn’t altogether bad. While I don’t think that the Chicago teachers are all that altruistic, at least they had the courage to stand up for themselves.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
7:44 am

“Georgia teachers will not see a raise until folks realize that the republicans under the gold dome do not want to fund schools one more penny. They hate public schools and would love to get their hands on TRS.”

@Sissy they’re Republicans; the party of “rule of law” and “personal responsibility” and “limited government.”

So why aren’t GAE and PAGE absolutely HAMMERING them on supporting teachers in matters of discipline and cutting administrative bloat? If they won’t give teachers the raise they want, at least give them decent teaching (and LEARNING!) conditions by restoring discipline and letting teachers know the money isn’t being spent in central office.

Is it because GAE and PAGE get dues from that administrative BLOAT? Is it because restoring discipline would hold their dues PAYING administrative members accountable for THEIR lack of action in supporting the sanctity of the learning environment?

Hmm…yet Georgia teachers make them THEIR representatives? At what point do Georgia teachers, with their choice of representation, realize they are being ACTIVE co-creators in their own misery?

Wilbur

September 23rd, 2012
7:58 am

Great. Chicago teachers would impoverish the public to support public employees. Is there no end to the greed and laziness? Public Education has long since stopped being about the students and is instead all about the teacher and administrator beneficiaries of a corrupt and failing system.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
8:03 am

How do you think John Q. Public might have responded if Chicago teachers had said, “You say there’s no money? Fine. We will take money off the table this year, if the school board and the Superintendent both agree to a 25% pay cut. ‘For the children’ of course.”

Think that might have put a little hitch in the giddy up of those who wanted to portray the teachers as only out for money?

ByteMe

September 23rd, 2012
8:14 am

Collective” – a term straight out of the old Soviet Union

Unfortunately, Maureen, that word “collective” is going to be as far as some people are going to read and immediately revert to their reflexive stance. Most haven’t read one thing about what the issues were in Chicago, but they’re ready to stand strong against the union and against anyone supporting unions. Keep trying to educate them, though. Maybe something will sneak in when they’re not looking.

Cindy Lutenbacher

September 23rd, 2012
8:26 am

I agree with Michele and with the letter by the TGWC. Let’s look at the facts of the concessions.
-A 3% pay increase the first year, with a 2% increase every year thereafter
-Phasing out performance-related pay, or “merit pay”
-Hiring 600 teachers in the areas of art, music, world languages, etc.
-Up to $250 reimbursement of school supplies
-Only 30% of student test scores will be factored into teacher evaluations
-Laid-off teachers receive hiring-priority for charter school position openings

(http://www.care2.com/causes/success-heres-what-the-chicago-teachers-get.html#ixzz27IBbiF9G)

The salary increases barely keep up with inflation. At least, teachers won’t keep getting poorer in order to remain teaching. The “increases” look like cost-of-living-adjustments to me.

I don’t know how pay-for-performance is determined in Chicago. But if it’s tied to standardized test scores, then I certainly favor phasing it out. (See below.)

Hurrah for arts, music, and languages! There’s overwhelming research evidence that shows art, music, and second language learning are terrific not only for human development, but also for the profound support of other disciplines, such as math, language arts, etc.

School supplies–it’s about time that teachers who care enough to raid their own wallets for pencil, paper, and tissues for their students get reimbursed. Teachers shouldn’t be penalized for caring.

I’m for anything that reduces (or ends) the corporate-driven reliance on standardized testing. The tests are worse than useless (see all independent research…), for they consume teaching and learning time that our kids need and deserve.

I also favor the protection of the rights of laid-off workers, for this concession may help to keep the for profit charters from hiring only kinfolk or less credentialed teachers, or from other creepy practices by entities seeking to “make” money off our kids.

The CTU didn’t get everything it wanted. I didn’t see anything about school nurses, facilities, or poverty and racism-oriented policies. There’s still much work to be done. But the CTU made a good start, showing that when teachers stand with one another, we are not powerless. Way to go, CTU!

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
8:29 am

“Most haven’t read one thing about what the issues were in Chicago, but they’re ready to stand strong against the union and against anyone supporting unions.”

All the more reason for the unions to shape the debate. Instead of having posters like Wilbur blame the teachers, imagine what might happen if the entire city started looking at a handful of board members and a well paid superintendent and asked why THEY aren’t willing to sacrifice ‘for the children’ when the teachers clearly are?

Lee

September 23rd, 2012
8:45 am

“The Chicago Teachers Union strike will go down as a significant event in history when educators stood up against the destructive powers of privatization and for workers’ job security and a strong middle-class in the United States.”

ROFLMAO. What a boatload of crap.

The only thing this strike proved is Exhibit A as to why you do not want government employees such as firemen, police, garbagemen, and teachers to unionize. They care nothing about the taxpayer/citizens for which they serve. The only think these Chicago “teachers” walked out for was their own selfish greed. Period.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
8:47 am

@Cindy, what’s the first thing you reference? Pay! And teachers wonder why John Q. Public thinks they are “greedy” “lazy” and a whole host of other pejoratives?

How different the perception might be if teachers DIDN’T lead with pay. If for example they led with DISCIPLINE? Led with teaching and LEARNING conditions being improve through better discipline, through protection against administrative retaliation, issues John Q. Public CAN relate to?

Add to that, imagine if teachers said “For every dollar we concede in pay, match it by cutting administrative BLOAT. Match it by showing the superintendent and the board will cut their OWN pay.”

Kind of hard for the Wilburs of the world (see above) to blame the greedy teachers if the unions would be sharper in the way they shape the debate.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
8:58 am

Look at Lee’s post and Wilbur’s post and you see how Chicago teachers failed to shape the debate.

They might have gotten something for THEMSELVES but for teachers as a whole, for teaching and LEARNING conditions as a whole, they got next to nothing.

Dc

September 23rd, 2012
9:03 am

Anyone who thinks the chicago teachers strike will help teachers orgs win support is either blind or insane. This strike was incredibly damaging to the reputation of teachers across the country. It reinforced in the clearest possible terms that educrats want to keep the failing school system “as is” and are entrenched in their resistance to valid improvements.

Please, please, please keep this up. That way, as more people realize that educrats are NOT all about the children, but rather are all about their jobs, will true reform happen

Mary Elizabeth

September 23rd, 2012
9:22 am

I agree with all the sentiments expressed in the courageious letter above. People are always criticized when they speak out. That goes with the territory.

In the following excerpt from the above letter, notice the words “. . .access to fully funded public schools that aren’t destroyed by for-profit charters. . .”:

“Thank you for fighting for the rights of children, youth and families to have access to fully funded public schools that aren’t destroyed by for-profit charters not held to the same level of scrutiny.”

Now, read of the sentiments of George Washington regarding profiteers in society, from the book, “Washington, A Life,” by Ron Chernow, page 352:

“Staying at the Chestnut Street home of Henry Laurens, Washington got a view of civilian life that would revolt him with an indelible vision of private greed and profligacy. Like soldiers throughout history, he was jarred by the contrast between the austerity of the army and the riches being earned on the home front through lucrative war contracts.

Ever since Valley Forge, Washington had lamented the profiteering that deprived his men of critcally needed supplies and he remained contemptuous of those who rigged and monopolized markets, branding them ‘the pests of society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America. . .”
===========================================

We must keep public schools truly public ones, paid for by public taxes to serve the public good. We must not allow public schools to become the vehicle for private market profiteers who might use school children for the profit purposes of private individuals or of private corporations, instead of focusing upon the common good for all students within society, and for the enhancement of society-at-large, via public schools, for all of society’s citizens. We must improve public education; we must not dismantle it for an educational delivery system which is based on private market interests.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
9:38 am

“Thank you for fighting for the rights of children, youth and families to have access to fully funded public schools that aren’t destroyed by for-profit charters not held to the same level of scrutiny.”

@Mary Elizabeth, put aside your (well founded) issues with the privateers. How can Chicago teachers be seen as ‘for the children’ when not a SINGLE word (to my knowledge) of their complaints was focused on improve teaching AND learning conditions by supporting teachers in matters of discipline?

Are we to believe the social environment of inner city Chicago is so pristine that discipline is no longer an issue?

notaracist

September 23rd, 2012
9:43 am

I do not have a problem with Teachers seeking better pay. They have homes and families to feed just like those who would deny them a fair wage. How soon we forget, it was and is, Teachers who were at the start of our Educational endeavors. Some, no none of us who are successful would be where we are, if it were not for a teacher. And, anyone who does not understand that fact, you do not understand because you choose not too. As you type your comments, and read other responses…think about the teacher who taught you to do so. Well wishes to all.

Fred in DeKalb

September 23rd, 2012
9:54 am

Beverly Fraud, you are correct to point out that the Chicago teachers did not have a good strategy in emphasizing their primary concerns. Historically most strikes have been about pay whereas most of this strike was about work conditions and a better teaching environment for students. If they led with that as their primary focus and the media actually picked up on that, the conversation may have gone a different way.

Grob Hahn

September 23rd, 2012
9:55 am

Anyone who thinks this strike actually helped the image of teachers needs therapy. What we have seen is what we thought were the most educated among us stooping to the kinds of tactics once reserved for dock workers and welders. When pilots tried this they discovered how non-union Reagan was. Georgia teachers shouldn’t be patting strikers on the back while Georgia parents are worrying about sliding education results, cheating scandals and bloated school administration. A lot of parents are seriously questioning your talent in Georgia because home schooling groups are exploding. Thanks to shared resources they are demonstrating a level of dedication we haven’t seen in most teachers for decades. Yea, it’s all the fault of the parents.
Grobbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

catlady

September 23rd, 2012
9:56 am

Bootney: Sonny made overtures to get the TRS money when he was on the throne.

Whirled Peas

September 23rd, 2012
10:00 am

If you want to understand what really goes on in a teacher’s head, this is a good letter. She talks about the welfare of the kids. She has to. But she is only interested in the welfare of the teacher.

Breaking up the government run school system monopoly will do for education what breaking up AT&T did for communications in the US. Without the AT&T breakup, the internet would probably not exist.

Breaking up the government run school monopoly will induce efficiency and innovation. Forcing a government run monopoly on the people will protect inefficiency and stagnation.

If you want to know what is really going on in Maureen Downey’s head, look at the letters she publishes and the people she quotes. Any one who says the AJC is fair and balanced has not bothered to read this column.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
10:03 am

“Historically most strikes have been about pay whereas most of this strike was about work conditions and a better teaching environment for students. If they led with that as their primary focus and the media actually picked up on that, the conversation may have gone a different way.”

@Fred, how could they NOT get that? I don’t see this as a “victory” but as an opportunity squandered.

mark

September 23rd, 2012
10:04 am

Any increase in pay is better than the decreases in pay that I and other Georgia teachers have received over the past 4 years. I love my pay cut each year. In florida, some teacher unions told their members not to write letters of recommendation, or sponser clubs. I had this past week off, with lots of work for school to complete, but since I worked my “odd jobs” to make up for lost pay I did not have time to complete it. I guess my school work will have to wait until Monday, while I am on the clock.

teacher&mom

September 23rd, 2012
10:16 am

Here’s a breakdown of the negotiations and settlements.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/what-teachers-say-they-won-in-chicago-strike/2012/09/19/6689ccda-0296-11e2-91e7-2962c74e7738_blog.html

Granted, this is published by the CTU and may or may not look identical to the Rahm administration’s breakdown of the negotiations (as noted by the reporter in the article), the document posted on in this article does show the teachers were standing up for more than just pay.

I agree with Beverly Fraud that any time a teacher mentions pay, the public immediately closes their minds to any further discussion. Which is exactly why the opposition makes sure the pay raise issue stays first and foremost in the news.

Just A Teacher

September 23rd, 2012
10:28 am

Thanks for publishing this letter, Maureen. It was well written and demonstrates to me that there are others in our state who share my belief that public education funding is being plundered by greedy, self serving profiteers. I just don’t understand why the average citizen. whose child is supposed to be the benificiary of our services, stands by and lets the education system be dismantled by unfavorable (to say the least) working conditions and crippling austerity cuts for those of us in charge of teaching children.

The charter school movement is not about improving public education. It is about money. Corporate raiders do not care about the quality of service provided to their customers nearly as much as they care about profits. Your children will suffer if public education becomes privatized. It is sadly ironic that teachers in this state cannot participate in collective bargaining because that right is reserved for private sector employees and yet our schools are being turned over to the private sector to manipulate and plunder. Soon a teacher’s worth will not be based on anything more than how little pay is required to keep him or her in front of the classroom. It is also ironic that the far right is behind this movement since dismantling the intelligentsia has always been a favorite tactic of the Communist party when it overthrows a government. I’m not comparing the Republican Party to the Khymer Rouge, but if the shoe fits . . .

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
10:31 am

“I agree with Beverly Fraud that any time a teacher mentions pay, the public immediately closes their minds to any further discussion”

Yet it’s invariably the first thing teacher advocates mention. Why do teachers continually lead with their CHIN when it comes to shaping the education debate?

The opposition can’t make the pay issue “first and foremost” if the teachers shape the debate, can they?

Ed Johnson

September 23rd, 2012
10:40 am

Certainly, let’s applaud CTU’s pushback on, in effect, Obama’s education privatization polices implicit in Race to the Top and such.

That said, CTU settling for tying 30% of teachers’ evaluations to test scores is puzzling, if not alarming. That particular settlement can only continue to undermine what is truly important, which is to improve our public education systems for the sake of sustaining democratic ideals in service to the common good.

So, it’s hard to accept any percentage of test scores tied to teachers’ evaluations and it’s puzzling as to why CTU would compromise on such a terribly important matter.

Gosh, hopefully CTU’s settlement on tying 30% of teachers’ evaluations to test scores won’t spread to become an exemplar for others to adopt.

Otherwise, we’ll simply keep getting more of this…

http://www.ajc.com/news/cheating-our-children/district-bios/
http://www.ajc.com/news/cheat-playbook/
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/education/school-test-cheating-thrives-while-investigations-/nSHwF/

Mary Elizabeth

September 23rd, 2012
10:45 am

Beverly Fraud, 9:38 am

“@Mary Elizabeth, put aside your (well founded) issues with the privateers. How can Chicago teachers be seen as ‘for the children’ when not a SINGLE word (to my knowledge) of their complaints was focused on improve teaching AND learning conditions by supporting teachers in matters of discipline?”
————————————————————————-

I supported the Chicago teachers, in large part, because I believe that there are powerful forces in this nation who would try to undermine the value of workers to speak out for their rights, via unions. (See the out-of-state conservative donors’ financial influence in Wisconsin, with the recall election of Gov. Scott Walker, who had spoken against unions.)

It stands to reason that the Chicago teachers know better than those outside of Chicago what their most pressing needs are. I did see the leader of that strike on television say that the heavy-handed use of standardized testing was hurting the overall education of students in ways similar to those expressed in the above letter. (And, I am a strong supporter for the use of standardized testing – for DIAGNOSTIC purposes regarding instruction, not for punitive or fear-inducing purposes such as job security.)

I support the addressing of discipline problems in schools, but I believe that discipline problems should be addressed with compassion, considering the overall reasons for those problems. Children understand care and compassion, even when discipline must be addressed effectively toward them, and they also understand when care and compassion are absent in the addressing of those discipline problems. As teachers, we must model for students what values we want them to emulate, such as compassion toward others. Those students who are not creating discipline problems, also, will observe HOW the discipline problems are handled and addressed. I believe that those students, too, are influenced positively when they observe teachers handling discipline problems with firmness, but with care and compassion. The bottom line, however, is that the teacher must be in control of his or her classroom, not the students or the parents.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/06/us/politics/walker-survives-wisconsin-recall-effort.html?pagewanted=all

RJ

September 23rd, 2012
10:45 am

“School supplies–it’s about time that teachers who care enough to raid their own wallets for pencil, paper, and tissues for their students get reimbursed. Teachers shouldn’t be penalized for caring.”

Amen! This unspoken expectation that teachers should be willing to spend their money to do their job needs to end. I received NOTHING this year for my class. Since I’m not core, the answer is, “you have a job”. Wow! No raises, have my own family to take care of, and I need to buy supplies like pencils, a pencil sharpener, markers, etc for the entire school since I teach everyone. It’s become exhausting fighting to do your job.

I find it funny that anyone would call teachers greedy. Yeah, these huge six figure salaries we pull in, and we’re asking for more huh? I really want to know how many people are expected to pay for basic resources to do their job. I’ve spoken to many people and nobody has said they do.

Mary Elizabeth

September 23rd, 2012
10:52 am

From the link I provided at 10:45 am, above:

“As of late last month, about $45.6 million had been spent on behalf of Mr. Walker, compared with about $17.9 million for Mr. Barrett, according to data from the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, a nonpartisan group that tracks spending.

‘What it shows is the peril of corporate dollars in an election and the dangers of Citizens United,’ said Dennis Van Roekel, president of the National Education Association, a school workers’ union, referring to the 2010 Supreme Court decision that barred the federal government from restricting political expenditures from corporations, unions and other groups.”

10:10 am

September 23rd, 2012
10:59 am

The “letter” is pathetic. Just another collection of tired old excuses the union puts forward in opposing reform and parental choice in education.

Polling indicates that 58% of Georgia voters are poised to approve the constitutional amendment restoring extra authority to approve charters at the state level, So once again, teachers’ union money is being wasted here in Georgia on partisan politics.

Georgia Association of Educators members can take a look at where the rest of that extra $168 in yearly National Education Association dues they pay goes … by Googling “NEA” and “donations.”

NTLB

September 23rd, 2012
11:21 am

Vote ‘NO” for the amendment of the GA constitution for charter schools provision. Another political move that will allow more corruption and empowerment of people who are NON EDUCATORS to have sole authority over our students’ education ONCE AGAIN.

Mary Elizabeth

September 23rd, 2012
11:21 am

@ 10:10 am

“Polling indicates that 58% of Georgia voters are poised to approve the constitutional amendment restoring extra authority to approve charters at the state level. . .”
=================================================

It is my belief that those who conducted that poll, with those results communicated to the public, are as interested in swaying public opinion as they are in analyzing public opinion. This is a Republican polling group.

I urge eaders to check out information about this polling group at the following link:
http://www.mclaughlinonline.com/5

There, readers will learn not only that this is a Republican polling group, not a non-partisan one, but that Gov. Nathan Deal and Lt. Governor Casey Cagle are among its clients. On the polling group’s website are these words: “The Washington Times cites McLaughlin and Associates as one of the best Republican polling firms.” Furthermore, the CEO and Partner John McLaughlin writes on the “Home Page” of this website that his firm had been “working with House Majority Leader Eric Cantor to help him win a majority in Congress.”

This polling group, evidently then, acts to help clients win elections, not simply to give them polling results.

Moreover, in previewing the questions that this polling group submitted to Georgians on the constitutional amendment (from the link provided on Jim Galloway’s thread of September 19, 2012, on this issue), I found the questions to be quite leading in promoting the value of this constitutional amendment to Georgians polled. That is my opinion. It is, also, my opinion that the Republican leaders in Georgia have actively engaged in establishing, within Georgia, educational policies that are very similar to those advocated by national Republican ideologues of power and influence, and that this poll helps in that effort.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
11:21 am

“the use of the term “collective” brings to mind the worst fears of Joe average, and plays dead into the hands of Fran Millar and his wannabe minions”

Unfortunately, I have to agree. While sitting idly by and watching the fools under the Gold dome systematically defund public education is at best gutwrenching, those who choose to commend any effort by a big, bad scurrilous union just become “defenders of the status quo” as we are often called. While I support much of what the strike was about, we are in a period where the powers that be are using very powerful, negative public sentiment in a bad economy to make unions look like minions of the devil himself. I have no illusions that what the Chicago teachers may have accomplished in the short term will only fuel the fires against public education in the rest of the country and provide a very real example for them to throw into the media every time someone dares speak out against what the “reform” movement supports.

I hope many will look at what we’re trying to do to education in Georgia and see the lunacy of it. Our legislators are controlled, ironically, by a “collective” hive mindset that has public education in the crosshairs. No amount of success or reform implemented from within will change that mindset.

Pompano

September 23rd, 2012
11:27 am

“The collective defines its goals as: 1) empowering educators to reclaim their workplace and professionalism”

What a joke. These people are employees – no different than anyone else – yet they want to put themselves up on some type of pedestal. Do your Jobs – you do not run the asylum (nor should you)!

More money and less accountability is what every educator desires. To claim this strike has anything to do with the “Rights of children” is pathetic.

Cindy Lutenbacher

September 23rd, 2012
11:28 am

Just a quick note here, Beverly: I copied the short list of concessions from another website and put the url beneath. I didn’t lead with pay; the source did. Had I rearranged the list, I would have been incorrectly using the source.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
11:35 am

“While I support much of what the strike was about, we are in a period where the powers that be are using very powerful, negative public sentiment in a bad economy to make unions look like minions of the devil himself.”

In other words, teachers are ALLOWING the opponents to shape the debate. When have you EVER heard a GAE or PAGE representative say to Millar, Deal and company, “You claim to be the party of ‘rule of law’ and ‘personal responsibility;’ where are your meaningful proposals, with REAL TEETH in them, to support teachers in matters of discipline?

If GAE and PAGE were willing to hold the Gold Dome crowd accountable for upholding their own values, the debate could change in a way that would resonate with the public.

The question is, why won’t GAE and PAGE advocate for their teachers in this manner?

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
11:38 am

@Cindy, agreed. But again, it points out, if you KNOW the school system is going to play the “greedy union” card, shape the debate in a way that resonates with the public. Discipline, cutting administrative bloat should be at the TOP of the list.

Why can’t teacher advocates see this?

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
11:57 am

“Do your Jobs – you do not run the asylum (nor should you)! ”

Trust me, we know that. It’s the ones who DO run the asylum that are the problem, but we as voters keep electing them and letting them do this crazy stuff.

If you actually knew and talked to any teachers for any length of time, you’d realize how ludicrous your sweeping generalizations of us are. Better yet, you should come into a school and spend some time watching it all happen. You’d be surprised how your views would change then.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
12:02 pm

“shape the debate in a way that resonates with the public.”

Unfortunately Bev, we’ve been beaten to the punch on that one by the politicians and their privatization agenda. It’s not an easy debate to frame with a public that doesn’t understand the details of the education monstrosity and doesn’t truly understand the trickle-down nature of power and resources. People in general don’t have the time or energy to get into the policy debates that we really need to have. They’re used to sixty second sound bytes, and those right now present a pretty bad view of education. The hard work of many teachers goes unnoticed, and no matter how much press we may try to put out there, the ones that make the news are the sensational idiots (and you point them out often). But I do agree that the teachers’ union folks really should have done a better job of national PR on this one!

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
12:05 pm

“The question is, why won’t GAE and PAGE advocate for their teachers in this manner?”

I’m beginning to wonder that myself. Both organizations are evidently pretty heavily populated by the management level, and they certainly don’t want lowly teachers getting any sense of empowerment. That would shake up the administrative downflow of decision-making, wouldn’t it?

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
12:10 pm

“That said, CTU settling for tying 30% of teachers’ evaluations to test scores is puzzling, if not alarming. That particular settlement can only continue to undermine what is truly important, which is to improve our public education systems for the sake of sustaining democratic ideals in service to the common good.”

Again, John Q. Public reads this as “teachers don’t want accountability” SHAPE THE DEBATE! Agree to this BUT agree to have the validity of it vetting by an independent statistician.

When John Q. Public sees you can’t find a statistician that goes along with this, the debate CHANGES from “teachers don’t want accountability” to “why is the school system pushing this nonsense?”

Add to that a proposal that teachers will take a pay raise off the table for a set time (1 year, 2 years, what have you) in exchange for the Superintendent and school board taking a pay cut, THEN John Q. Public has a handful of individuals they can call greedy, individuals they VOTED for, and not
“the union”

SHAPE THE DEBATE…before it shapes you!

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
12:13 pm

“I’m beginning to wonder that myself. Both organizations are evidently pretty heavily populated by the management level,”

Yes RonF and the fact that teachers have made them THEIR voice makes as much sense as chickens thinking Truett Cathy is their one true advocate.

At some point, teachers have to realize decisions like this are making them ACTIVE co-creators of their own misery.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
12:16 pm

“More money and less accountability is what every educator desires. To claim this strike has anything to do with the “Rights of children” is pathetic.”

Again, could the likes of Pompano, Lee, and Wilbur hold this view if union had been willing to forgo a pay raise in exchange for the Superintendent and school board agreeing to a pay cut and a 10-15% across the board cut in central office administrative BLOAT?

teacher&mom

September 23rd, 2012
12:26 pm

“Are we to believe the social environment of inner city Chicago is so pristine that discipline is no longer an issue?”

@Beverly F: Did you happen to see page 4 of the document I linked to???

Rahm’s administration wanted to eliminate Assault leave and change it to worker’s comp. for 2/3rd pay. Teachers in Chicago had to fight for assault leave.

Somehow I doubt the social environment is pristine if teachers have to fight for 100% paid leave for being assaulted.

Did anyone in the media even pick up on this little tidbit? Teachers had to push back to preserve Assault leave.

And we have the audacity to bash these teachers up the side of the head for standing up for themselves?

teacher&mom

September 23rd, 2012
12:30 pm

“Again, could the likes of Pompano, Lee, and Wilbur hold this view if union had been willing to forgo a pay raise in exchange for the Superintendent and school board agreeing to a pay cut and a 10-15% across the board cut in central office administrative BLOAT?”

In my rural district, the central office has cut AT LEAST that much and the administrators have taken more furlough days than the teachers.

Yet….folks in my community…who view public education like Lee, Pompano, and Wilber…come unglued when our local BOE even begins to mention a small mileage rate increase.

Damned if you do…..damned if you don’t.

Prof

September 23rd, 2012
12:34 pm

From the beginning of this strike, I’ve thought that I don’t know enough to take sides; and I still think that those living outside Chicago don’t either. It’s a rough, gritty, though beautiful, city.

From regularly visiting my close relative living in that city, I know that Chicago is de facto segregated (South side, generally black and North side, generally white), and so is its school system. A May 2012 NY Times article stated that Chicago Public Schools are the most segregated among large city school systems. I’ve also studied the phenomenon of South side gangs and their domination of the neighborhoods from which the South side school children come.

So I would like to know the extent to which the Chicago Teachers Union represents those teachers of the inner city South side. Is it primarily an inner-city teachers’ union? If so, what they’re demanding is “combat pay.” I also don’t know anything about the caliber of those teachers, and the training required to be hired in Chicago inner-city public schools.

And I frankly don’t think that educators in Georgia can know either.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
12:42 pm

“Rahm’s administration wanted to eliminate Assault leave and change it to worker’s comp. for 2/3rd pay. Teachers in Chicago had to fight for assault leave.”

@teacher&mom thanks for pointing that out. Why wasn’t this FRONT and CENTER???

Run this ad in the local paper:

Why does Rahm want teachers to LOSE pay when they are a victim of PHYSICAL ASSAULT in the classroom?

You don’t think John Q. Public would resonate with THAT more than teachers asking for a pay raise???

You Can't Fix Stupid

September 23rd, 2012
12:42 pm

@Grob Hahn 09:55—If you are going to use a historical event to make your BS point then at least get it right. It was NOT pilots that went on strike, but air traffic controllers. I am sure you could ask any teacher and they could explain to you the difference between private industry employees and federal employees. Learn what you are talking about first before you run your stupid mouth.

Sincerely, A husband of a VERY dedicated school teacher.

Beverly Fraud

September 23rd, 2012
12:46 pm

“In my rural district, the central office has cut AT LEAST that much and the administrators have taken more furlough days than the teachers.”

@teacher&mom if the administrators are doing that, I’d have to think that teacher morale must be at least a little bit better than places like APS and DeKalb where it’s the LAST thing central office wants to do.

Metro Coach

September 23rd, 2012
1:25 pm

I wish all the teachers in Georgia who favor a union would move to states that have them. I could use the spot vacated by one of you morons. Teachers’ unions are the reason the entire profession gets a bad name.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
1:55 pm

I’m kinda inclined to think coaches who call others morons do far more damage to the profession than a union ever could

10:10 am

September 23rd, 2012
1:57 pm

Union generated “letters” aside, education reform and parental choice is now a civil rights issue. Arguably the central one of our era.

Democrats themselves are divided between those seeking to stave off education reform and thus protect union dues revenues—and those, mostly inner-city parents, whose children actually pay the price for non-performing traditional public schools.

Vote “Yes” on the constitutional amendment.

Georgia coach

September 23rd, 2012
1:58 pm

Many coaches. Are far from being morons, bootney

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
2:01 pm

@ catlady,

now that you mention it, I do remember something about that. Sonny wanted our money, only to find that since that state of Georgia DOESN’T pay our pensions he had no legal access to them.

just goes to show stupidity and a lack of integrity is not the province of any one person, group, race, political party, ect.

it annoys the fool out of me that so many insist on trying to make this a democrat/republican issue when the problems are much deeper and more complex. neither side has clean hands

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
2:03 pm

@ georgia coach

broad brush accusations sorta sting, don’t they?

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
2:06 pm

@ 10:10

how one earth do you get that? a civil rights issue?
hardly.

no one is being denied education based on race/religion.
nor are they being denied to ability to homeschool, pursue private education, or move to a new location.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
2:12 pm

@ William

I also have a lot of respect for them standing for themselves. I also acknowledge they have the ability to do so. if we tried that here, we’d be destroyed. I’ve seen it firsthand.

twice in my career I have stood when no one else would. I paid a heavy price, but couldn’t have lived with myself if I hadn’t.

ultimately we need a Norma Rae, somebody with the nerve, nothing to lose, and the right person with the right message to balance the scales.

[...] Teaching Georgia Writing Collective.  The letter was initially posted on Maureen Downey’s Get Schooled website on the Atlanta Journal [...]

10:10 am

September 23rd, 2012
2:22 pm

@bootney

How on earth do you not see parental choice as a civil rights issue? Because your own kids aren’t imprisoned in traditional inner-city schools?

Private schools? For rich one-percenter liberals like President Obama and Rahm Emanuel that’s a legitimate option.

Not so for most inner-city Atlanta parents.

Bernie

September 23rd, 2012
2:29 pm

If I went to work in a factory the first thing I’d do is join a union. – Franklin D. Roosevelt

The City of Chicago schools are as unsafe as any, Factory you would find anywhere.

educators united

September 23rd, 2012
2:30 pm

Children are the most important part of our nations future. Those equipped with the mission of educating our children should be provided with all the necessary resources and support to accomplish this goal. What ideas of a quality education do lawmakers have? Test, test, and more test! What about teaching? What about helping the child to become a critical thinker, not what to think?
https://www.change.org/petitions/georgia-department-of-education-withdraw-the-teacher-keys-evaluation-system

MsCrabtree

September 23rd, 2012
2:31 pm

Oh, I really don’t need a teachers’ union to bargain for better working conditions. I like buying toilet tissue, facial tissue, hand sanitizer, pencils, other school supplies, and xerox paper. I like that I don’t have any workbooks for the students. I like having 30 little ones in my class, especially when I don’t have enough seats. I like losing my duty free 20 min. lunch break. I love not having prep periods. I enjoy endless meetings till 5 or 6 PM, because I like staying up all night to grade papers and do my plans. I love being bullied by administrators and other central office flunkies. I think it’s ok that students with behavior problems can’t get written up. I don’t mind the pay cuts and furloughs. After all, Clark Howard says, who needs a new car anyway? And my mortgage lender will gladly foreclose on my house if I can’t make ends meet. Should I go on?

Ed Johnson

September 23rd, 2012
2:40 pm

“SHAPE THE DEBATE”

Let’s appreciate the zeal to “SHAPE THE DEBATE.” Still, “SHAPE THE DEBATE” is but a zero-sum competition that’s more about winning the debate than about John Q Public or public education.

If pursued, no matter who wins, John Q Public will be none the wiser or any more enlightened after the debate than before the debate. (I suggest Mary Elizabeth has shown great tenacity around this point, trying to help us.)

Stagnation, if not retrogression, is the trap “SHAPE THE DEBATE” invites. So be careful implying, insinuating, or otherwise suggesting John Q Public is too stupid to know or to learn what’s going on.

But do be watchful of and try to help and enlighten the Rhee-indoctrinated John Q Publics who go around yapping about “parental choice is now a civil rights issue.”

Such rhetoric is but a blatant, self-serving appeal to a certain “race”-based consciousness held by people who tend to define themselves in terms of what’s been done to them instead of in terms of the wonderful human beings they are.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
2:43 pm

“Not so for most inner-city Atlanta parents.”

Part of the problem in inner-city schools across the country is the lack of involved parents. Some are, and deserve better than they have, but it’s more than just teachers that need changing. You have to change the mindset of the community. When children come from homes that emphasize education, regardless of socio-economic level, they tend to do well. Unfortunately, in the inner city schools they are surrounded by those who don’t have that basic value at home. Are schools to blame for the proliferation of gangs? Are the schools to blame for the drug sales, prostitution, and street violence prevalent in so many inner-city neighborhoods? We can’t just teach them the curriculum and make everything fine. The schools are just a microcosm of the areas they serve, and until you get folks to teach all the children that education is as much a necessity as food, clothing, and shelter, you’ll never fix the problems that lead to the schools being in such a mess. Make the charter schools, give parents “choice” and you still have the same kids from the same homes with the same social issues they’ll have to face regardless of what the local school has for curriculum or management. How do we “fix” the communities and get more parents involved?

I love teaching. I hate what it is becoming...

September 23rd, 2012
2:43 pm

@10:10 am “Democrats themselves are divided between those seeking to stave off education reform and thus protect union dues revenues—and those, mostly inner-city parents, whose children actually pay the price for non-performing traditional public schools.”

You really think those behind the big money push for this Charter Amendment are doing so to support struggling “inner city parents”? Ha!

Actually, I suspect you know they aren’t, you just hope to convince the rest of us that they are – cause inner city parents are just the sort of folks ALEC and Wal-Mart heiresses look to put their money behind.

Again, I say, Ha!

Dr. Monica Henson

September 23rd, 2012
3:04 pm

“fully funded public schools that aren’t destroyed by for-profit charters not held to the same level of scrutiny.”

Wrong again–charter schools are NOT for-profit institutions. They are public schools. Like district schools, they are governed by nonprofit boards, which may sign a contract with a for-profit corporation to manage the school or provide educational and/or back office services and support. District school boards are elected, while charter school boards are formed by a founding group that includes parents, educators, and community stakeholders.

District public schools are free to do the SAME thing, and some have done so over the years, with varied degrees of success, depending strongly on the political climate in the district and the willingness to follow through on supporting the measures recommended.

Charter public schools are subject, at a minimum, to identical scrutiny as any other public school (if it’s a district-authorized school), ranging to increased scrutiny if it is a state-chartered school because it must report finances, governance, and educational information directly to the state department of education.

EVERY public school in the entire United States, district or charter, does business with for-profit corporations. Every single one of them. There are no textbook publishers, technology vendors, food suppliers, etc., that I am aware of who are not in business to make a profit.

The “for-profit privateers will dismantle the public schools” argument is tiresome at best. It’s utterly ridiculous and a smokescreen thrown up constantly by those who want to preserve the status quo at any cost.

No surprise that the professors of schools of education would sign onto such an obsequious letter–they threw their lot in long ago with the NEA and the AFT in the effort to avoid any form of accountability. The USDOE has been pressing for schools of education to be held accountable for producing graduates who can help students read and write at least at grade level in order to preserve their federal funding.

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
4:24 pm

As a former CPS teacher, this strike was utter BS!!! It was NOT about children, or improving the quality of instruction. It was about making sure teachers were taken care of.

First, teachers with tenure who are displaced in CPS, can look for a job. A principal may or may not chose to hire them, but they have the sub pool to fall back on. Yes, the sub pool, where they earn their regular salary and benefits and substitute teach. A teacher can choose to just be a sub and keep their top salary as several of the people my friend worked with decided to do when they were told to look for a job. Teacher with tenure are not out on the street or receiving an unemployment check. They will be sitting at the Central Office and collecting their salary or substituting at the very least.

Second, the teacher work day at CPS is 6 hours. A half hour of that time is lunch, so they are only teaching for 5 1/2 hours, plus the planning time that all teachers get. Teachers teach for less than 5 hours a day in most cases.

Third, Chicago is a pretty expensive place to live, however the top teachers are pulling in big bucks for working about 25 hours a week. Even a starting out teacher is making a very nice salary. These teachers aren’t hurting. They should be worried about the health of their pension fund, as when I taught there it was in pretty bad shape, because the benefits being paid out were looking like they were going to exceed what would be brought in in future years.

Having friends in CPS and having taught there, this strike was all about the money and not about the children. Using the children is despicable. Teachers are not paid market wages, they try to dictate their worth inflating it. Wouldn’t workers in other non-government fields like to dictate their wages, and benefits? And say that it was all for the customer.

Teachers strikes are nothing but unions and teachers being greedy. Teachers need to stop the unions and start being paid fair market wages. Maybe it would be current salary levels, but maybe it would be less. Teachers need to be held accountable for the job that they do in the classroom. I’ve worked with many a teacher, that I wouldn’t want to train my dog, yet they got paid the same amount as I did, even when their students were making the grade and they weren’t doing their job.

The teachers were the only winners here. They will get inflated paychecks and the citizens of Chicago will be stuck paying higher taxes for an inferior product that 40% of teachers in CPS won’t send their children to. I would guess that number is similar around here. As I know very few public school teachers who actually send their child to public school and instead send them to private schools. Why aren’t parents asking why?

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
4:57 pm

As a former CPS teacher, I remember being treated awfully by those teachers who grasped on to the union, because I actually taught my students and they showed significant gains-everyone of my 38 students for the 6 years I taught there. Union thug teachers aren’t concerned about good teaching or providing a good education, they are concerned about what they can get for themselves. The 5 hour work day (1/2 hour for lunch, at least a 1/2 hour for a prep, and ten minutes for a bathroom break) with the average teacher making $80,000 wasn’t good enough.

Tenure CPS teachers who lose their job at their school because of enrollment, it closing or another reason other than bad teaching, do not go to the unemployment line. They get to be part of the sub pool or wait at the Central Office for a job to open up and be assigned to it. Teachers have the choice of looking for a job to replace the one they lost, or wait around and be a substitute. They keep their salary and benefits. These displaced teachers aren’t hurting or struggling, if they choose not to look for another teaching job.

Teachers don’t understand the free market, and how others receive their salaries and benefits. Many that I know have had to take pay cuts to keep their jobs, as the businesses they work for have taken in less revenue and employers could lay a few people off or keep everyone employed, but belts would have to be tightened.

For those saying that teachers are the only jobs that have to pay for their own supplies, that is utter hogwash. There are people who have to pay for their own uniforms or protective work gear, tools if you’re a mechanic, etc. Teachers have it pretty good in terms of the number of days worked. Yes, many do work at home, but so do so many other professionals (which is what a teacher wants to be thought of as) that don’t have unions or pay scales or pay even if their students don’t show any growth.

I see nothing wrong with paying a teacher $100,000 a year, if she/he is actually producing students that are making significant progress, enjoy learning, and have critical thinking skills that they can use in the real world. I do not want to pay even $25,000 for a teacher who realizes that the product she is a part of is lousy and sends her children to private school, and continues the problem instead of being part of the solution.

Teachers are quick to blame parents for the state of the schools. I blame teachers and parents, as both are not willing to demand a better quality of education for the children attending the public school system.

I taught on the South Side of Chicago. I had 38 children or more in my class. ALL of my kids were on welfare and few had a father figure in their home. I, a white girl from Philly, required my students to read and write proper English. I demanded of myself, the same quality of education that I received in school and that I would demand for my unborn children to receive. We wrote every day. We read every day. I read to them every day, and I had NO MATERIALS. Not a reading book or math book, and this was before the internet made finding materials so easy. We did lots of work off the chalk board because I was limited to the number of copies I could make. I gave only meaningful homework, hoping and praying that parents would take their children to the library. I fought parents who told me that I was making their child white and made them see how much their children were learning and how what an education could do for their child. I respected my students and their families and in return got that same respect back. I never joined the CPS teacher union. I had the union due fee taken out of my checks, but I did not join, as I was a child in public school and had two strikes happen during my 13 years. I saw teachers unions as caring only about the teachers and not about the children. My teachers wouldn’t coach sports, or write a letter of recommendation for me to send to a college, because it was against the unions. I fought becoming a teacher, because of what I saw with teacher unions. They are not what people think they are, and they are not about making education better. They are all for getting what they can for the teachers that they represent, even when the community can’t afford the teacher demands.

This letter disgusts me, as does any teacher who supports the teacher strike of Chicago. Working less than 5 hours a day and making $80,000 is pretty darn fair if you ask me. My husband graduated from an Ivy League university, worked for Lehman Brothers when he graduated and made less than I did as a first year teacher in CPS. He worked in NYC, which more expensive than Chicago. He worked longer hours and more days a year than I ever did as a teacher in any district that I worked in.

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
5:11 pm

Ms. Crabtree, I still had to purchase my own supplies when I taught in CPS. In fact, I had to ration the toilet paper that my students received and paper towels, as there was not any in the school bathrooms. No lie, I had to hand it out to the children. I had 38 students on average, sometimes 36 and sometimes 40, so even with a union class sizes can not be controlled.

Teachers in Georgia, see unions as this heavenly force that all of that the woes of teaching will disappear. You really don’t understand that it doesn’t matter if you’re in a union or a non-union state, until teachers put their focus on providing students with a quality education instead of their own paychecks, their working conditions won’t improve and people who really want a good education for their children won’t look at regular public schools as a viable option.

Halftrack

September 23rd, 2012
5:13 pm

All this is; is manipulation and pressure for teachers to get their way. Students are not in this picture. What are our adults of the future going to look like? Cry babies or mature people who can solve challenges. Take a quick guess!

Jeffrey

September 23rd, 2012
5:22 pm

Dear Chicago teachers:
We, wish we can get a 36% raise but unfortunally Ga and it opposed Right to Work state and we can ‘t force the taxpayers to pay for our sloopy teaching skills .We have and milk and force the State to march and loot in the streets.How, we hate living in a state tha t unions don’t control the Ga State gov

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
5:27 pm

One more thing about unions in Illinois. There are different unions/districts for elementary and middle schools than high schools. High school teachers get paid significantly more than elementary and high school teachers outside of Chicago.

Georgia teachers, need to do their own homework and get all of the facts and stop relying just on what they read and see in the news. There is much more to unions than meets the eye, and good teaching isn’t a care or concern for any union member that I’ve ever met.

Crawford Lewis

September 23rd, 2012
6:01 pm

Thank you Chicago for standing up for whats right!

red herring

September 23rd, 2012
6:29 pm

i keep going back to the taxpayer—the taxpayer funds all of this —the taxpayer receives none of the excessive salaries of ga. high school administration nor of chicago teachers—nor do they receive similar benefits (retirement/insurance,etc)—still these people want the taxpayers to pay more and more and will even strike to insist they do. More of our politicians should follow ronald reagan’s idea when the air traffic controllers went on strike— simply put—fire their asses and put new people in their jobs. it will work with chicago teachers also and ga. high school administration as well. if you want to see what is wrong with education in chicago (52% graduate) –then watch this video—it is self explanatory….. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1YXOSaMZzs&feature=related

Ed Johnson

September 23rd, 2012
6:33 pm

“EVERY public school in the entire United States, district or charter, does business with for-profit corporations.”

Yup. But there is a difference between a public school or district that does business with for-profit corporations to support the purpose, mission, goals, etc. of the public school or district and that of public school or district doing business with for-profit corporations that aim to profit no matter the public school’s or district’s purpose, mission, goals, etc.

APS’ The Latin Academy is an example of the latter situation.

“The ‘for-profit privateers will dismantle the public schools’ argument is tiresome at best.”

And the “charter schools are NOT for-profit institutions” tirade is specious, at best, and downright fraudulent, at worst.

Pride and Joy

September 23rd, 2012
6:54 pm

Grob Hahn knows what’s what:
“Georgia teachers shouldn’t be patting strikers on the back while Georgia parents are worrying about sliding education results, cheating scandals and bloated school administration. A lot of parents are seriously questioning your talent in Georgia.”
This parent questioned the talent and considered it worth little. My little children are in private school and thriving and I’ll be voting with that in mind. You rob me of my taxes and hand me a shoddy product and you think I should be thankful to you? He)) to the no!

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
7:28 pm

“simply put—fire their asses and put new people in their jobs. it will work with chicago teachers also and ga. high school administration as well.”

Reagan’s “firing” seemed like a simple solution, but even he knew there weren’t enough qualified people to take over the job. The same goes for teaching- fire them all, destroy the unions, and what will you have? Even in Georgia, which as a right-to-work state has no public sector unions, there aren’t enough people qualified to fill the positions. While I’ll agree that where schools aren’t performing, you need to consider teacher quality as one factor, you can’t just fire and replace them all and expect better results. The problems in Chicago go way beyond the teachers, and decades of “reform” have brought us to this point. Schools alone can’t fix the problems of the social environments they serve. They can offer alternatives and try their best to motivate kids to choose them, but at the end of the day the children still have to go home to the communities where the problems exist. How do you fix the community cultures that encourage, or at least allow, gangs and all sorts of violence? How do schools do that when even the police force can’t control the growth and power of gangs? It’s easy to sit and be an armchair quarterback, so to speak. It’s another thing entirely when you work in these communities and have to try to deal with all the issues in a child’s life while teaching a mandated curriculum that doesn’t even leave you time to really get to know and help the child make better choices. We need caring, devoted teachers, and lots of them. And there are many of them in both unionized and non unionized states.

Mary Elizabeth

September 23rd, 2012
8:04 pm

Well expressed, Dr. Johnson, at 6:33 pm.

Moreover, that there had been such intense debate on the constitutional amendment in Georgia’s last legislative session, that there have been such large amounts of money coming into Georgia from out-of-state donors to support passage of this amendment, that state Superintendent of Schools, Dr. John Barge, has received such heightened criticism by politicians for voicing that he cannot support this amendment because public school funding is already underfunded in Georgia, that polls have been conducted regarding this amendment by a group that has been known to advocate for Republican causes all suggest that delivery of public education, as we have known it, may be on the line in Georgia because of this amendment.

I will vote NO to this amendment because I wish to improve public education from within, with the help of charter schools which will work with school districts. I do not wish to see traditional public schools possibly dismantled. It is my opinion that traditional public schools were not designed for profit purposes, but were designed to serve the common good.

R Jones

September 23rd, 2012
8:14 pm

What a stupid letter. Teacher unions are ruining education in the states where unions are allowed and those teachers who don’t agree are FORCED to pay the dues 75K salary and they want more. Forty per cent drop out rate don’t get it Chicago.

Oscar

September 23rd, 2012
8:29 pm

Mary Elizabeth thank you so much for your informative well sourced comments.

d

September 23rd, 2012
8:38 pm

I have a very straight forward question about judging teacher quality. If we are going to say teachers are “good” teachers or “bad” teachers based in any significant percentage on student test scores, where are the quality controls on the tests themselves? This question is based primarily on two things I have heard in recent years. First, I was at a conference hosted by DoE and they were talking in particular about CRCT and one question that caused concern – something about the shape of a football. 80% of Hispanic students missed the question. Ok, I know that is only one example, but how do we verify that these types of questions don’t slip through more often? I can’t view or any state test to ensure it is really valid and that it matches the standards. (Ok, I’m gonna slip one more in here) What about the 6th and 7th grade Social Studies CRCT about 5 or 6 years ago… Questions like what is the currency of Chad? Really?!?! My original second point: teachers who helped work on DeKalb’s new curricula this past summer were told by the consultants that 40% of the time when a student misses a question on a standardizes test, it wasn’t that the student didn’t know the correct answer. They just weren’t sure what was being asked of them. If a question was reworded, they could answer it correctly. I often see that with my own classroom unit tests. If I rephrase, many times the student can answer correctly. I truly believe that we need to allow Georgia teachers greater input on the tests themselves, if not sole authorship, but then again, can anyone show me any student standardized test that was ever designed to show *teacher* effectiveness? I don’t think you can.

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
9:22 pm

d, the CRCT is one of the worst standardized tests that I have seen. Tests should be nationally normed and students should have to show at least a year’s growth. Parents need to know where their child stands with the children of the US, not Georgia. As they will be competing with kids from the US, not just Georgia.

It’s easy to find student growth in tests like the IOWA, CAT, and other nationally normed tests, if the same type of test is given each year. Most state tests are BS and junk. Teachers don’t need to be making standardized tests. Teachers don’t need to be teaching to a standardized test. Teachers need to provide our children with a quality education.

BehindEnemyLines

September 23rd, 2012
9:30 pm

The “teachers” in Chicago deserve nothing more than a one-way trip to the unemployment line. Miserable failures trying to leech every possible dime from the public teet. Clearly Georgia has its own fair share of the same shameful, and virtually worthless, parasites. But by all means, keep writing those letters, it makes it a lot easier to identify the ones that represent the least value for the money and the ones that need to be first to discover just how fed up the taxpayers are.

Mary Elizabeth

September 23rd, 2012
9:32 pm

@ Oscar, 8:29 pm

Thank you, Oscar. I very much appreciate your words.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
9:34 pm

“Teachers don’t need to be teaching to a standardized test. Teachers need to provide our children with a quality education.”

NCLB pretty much forced that issue, Teacher Reader. Even now, in the waning days of that nonsense, we’re poised to replace it with even more “accountability” based on test scores. If indeed you are a teacher, surely you’ve felt the pressure to make sure especially low performing students can reach that basic bar of success. Standardized tests aren’t going away any time soon, and as long as they exist teachers will be forced to some extent to teach the tested material. I’ve often heard “if it isn’t in the standards and isn’t going to be tested, don’t teach it.” Even when not explicitly spoken, it’s very much part of the culture of teaching these days. Changing that is going to take a long time.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
9:39 pm

“Clearly Georgia has its own fair share of the same shameful, and virtually worthless, parasites.”

Then become one of the new breed of worthy teachers and help fix the problem. Replace the “parasites” by putting yourself in the classroom. It’s easy to judge and spout opinions. Put feet to the words and become part of the “solution.”

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
9:43 pm

TEACHERS IN CHICAGO:

1. Are in school for 6 hours. They receive a half hour lunch break, a ten minute bathroom break and at least a half hour for a prep time 4 times a week.

2. Tenure teachers who are displaced because there aren’t enough students to fill a position, become part of the substitute teacher pool. They keep their salary and benefits and add to their retirement clock. No assignment, than you sit down at the Central Office.

3. Tenure is not given automatically after 3 years of teaching. A teacher must be assigned to the school, and then the 3 year clock begins. A principal doesn’t have to assign you and if you aren’t assigned after a years, a teacher is encouraged to move on and go to a different school to get assigned.

4. Large classrooms are the norm, both in classroom size and the number of students. I never had less than 36 first graders and the number was usually 38.

5. Teachers are hired based on skin color, because of some sort of racial laws having to do with the schools makeup. For example, an all black school, needs to hire a certain percentage of white teachers. A school with Hispanic and white students being the majority needs to hire a certain percentage of black teachers.

6. School districts in Illinois outside of Chicago have many school districts, they are broken up into elementary/middle and high school. Elementary/middle schools are sometimes done in clusters, but have separate unions and pay structure than the high schools. High school teachers are paid $5,000-$10,000 more than the elementary/middle school teacher with the same education and teaching experience.

7. Being a good teacher or a hard worker isn’t a quality admired by the unions. Towing the union line and doing as you are told, nothing more, nothing less is a much great quality admired by union thugs.

8. Those high salaries don’t mean that a teacher has copy paper, a working photocopier, dry erase markers/chalk/ or other materials to do a quality job.

How do I know these things? I taught in CPS and lived in Chicago for 6 years. The grass always looks greener, but trust me, it’s not.

d

September 23rd, 2012
9:43 pm

@Teacher Reader, I agree with your opinion on CRCT, Iowa, etc, but my basic question still stands. Were these tests designed to measure teacher performance? I don’t think so, and, as such, I don’t believe they should be used in that fashion.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
9:44 pm

@ 10:10

simple. I understand the difference between civil rights and stupid grandstanding.

the is no right to get things exactly the way you want them.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
9:47 pm

@ behind

interesting: teachers are parasites.

quite telling

Grob Hahn

September 23rd, 2012
9:49 pm

When are “educators” going to admit that black children are not just dark little white kids and that decades of treating them as if they are has resulted in millions of black children being totally screwed out of the education they should have had? Instead they come up with more and more clever ways to ensure that once they cross a magic threshold, they can’t be fired (easily) and they do whatever they feel is necessary to reach that magical point in their profession. Their methods have resulted in the worst possible institutional racism in the sheer insidious way it has been implemented.

Yea, I forgot it was the ATCs and not the pilots, sue me. Ask your teacher why they lie so much about educating black students. And why so little has changed for these forgotten American children.
Grobbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

d

September 23rd, 2012
9:53 pm

@Teacher Reader…. DeKalb currently has high school class sizes “capped” at 36+ depending on the content area. Problem is, unlike how you said CPS classrooms are built for that, I have yet to see a DCSD classroom built for that many. I am a GAE member, and I have seen them counsel teachers out of the profession. None of us want to be next to the proverbial bad teacher. It makes our job much harder. Several years ago, for 3 semesters, I was. I constantly had to stop what I was doing to handle that, and I was grateful when that ended. That teacher is no longer teaching.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
9:53 pm

@ Grob

any chance your insurance has mental health coverage for your anger issues?

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
9:54 pm

@ Ron, I was a teacher in DeKalb, but now homeschool. I never taught to a standardized test, even the CRCT. A good teacher understands the research and knows that private schools don’t teach to a test. They provide quality instruction. Quality instruction and high standards will get a teacher good test scores.

In Chicago, working in an all black school being white, I had to prove myself time and time again. I had NO materials. No reading series. No nothing. Just the standards that I was to teach to. I taught my students to the standards or above, as I was taught in grad school when I received my teaching certificate that the standards were a minimum of what the students should understand not everything. My students were usually the low end of the students coming out of kindergarten (I taught mostly first grade). These kids barely knew their alphabet letter names and forget about their sounds. I taught them how to read. We wrote stories. We worked on math skills. My kids always made a year and half to well over 2 years of instructional growth on the IOWA.

You see, I never made excuses for my students. I taught them were they were and kept on going. I knew that being one of two or three white teachers in an all black school, I had to prove myself. I taught my students the way that I would want my child to be taught.

Study after study shows that homeschooled children out perform public school kids on standardized tests. Why? Because they are taught and not taught to a test. There is such a difference.

It’s very easy for any teacher to analyze the data of a standardize test and know a child’s weakness and strengths. I did this back in the mid-90s-early 2000s, without a computer program to analyze the data for me. I read about it in a journal and decided to give it a try. It worked.

Sorry, there is nothing wrong with a good standardize test. We need to be sure that children are learning and making progress. There is something wrong with a poorly written test, which the CRCT is, as it provides teachers with no data and wastes children’s precious time.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
9:58 pm

something I find really interesting in all this:

the Fran Millar crowd seems determined to remain oblivious to the real spending wastes in education. our salaries are part of the cost issue, but by no means the biggest part – certainly not the boogyman presented. the system has become fundamentally flawed, yet the simple minds crowd focuses on a single issue.

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
9:59 pm

@ d, the problem with class size in DeKalb is very different from the fight of the Chicago Public School teacher (I’ve taught in both places). DeKalb County teachers speaking up against large class sizes that are too big for the rooms is something that the public would get behind. Asking for a huge pay increase when our home values are dropping each time DeKalb County Schools is in the news is not something that the population at large will get behind DCSS teachers.

Also complaining about the class size, shows that you care about the quality of education/instruction you are providing the students. Complaining about your salary makes one look greedy and selfish. There is a difference.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
10:03 pm

not too long ago I read a history of China. one one Mao’s big tricks was to demonize educators.
the cultural revolution was a smoke screen for rooting out anyone still capable to think for themselves.

many of the tactics used by Mao’s followers are very similar to the “solutions” offered up by the Franbots.

Dr. Monica Henson

September 23rd, 2012
10:04 pm

Ed Johnson, come on down and see me at 100 Edgewood Avenue downtown and take a good, close look at how we are executing our school’s mission, vision, and values. Attend one of our governing board meetings. Take a look at our books. Read our contract with our for-profit education service provider. Look at our purchasing & procurement processes.

After you do that, I dare you to find a single thing in any of the above that isn’t “doing does business with for-profit corporations to support the purpose, mission, goals, etc. of the public school or district.” Further, I double-dog dare you to find anything specious or fraudulent about any of it.

d

September 23rd, 2012
10:05 pm

@Teacher Reader, is asking that salary keeps up with inflation “greedy”? Inflation is about 3% annually, and I think that’s what Chicago teachers asked for and are receiving in that respect.

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
10:06 pm

@ bootney Farnsworth, Until teachers demand to teach and stop sitting back and teaching a boxed curriculum or to a stupid poorly written test, they will never have the masses behind them. Teachers need to start demanding to be able to do their job, which is to provide children an education that teaches them basics, excites them into life long learners, and gives them many opportunities to problem solve.

The general public is tired of teachers complaining about their salaries. As a former teacher, I am tired of hearing teachers complain about their salaries. I want to hear teachers complain about not being able to teach. Or about the lack of discipline in our schools. Or teaching to a test. Or other problems that generally affect the quality of education our children are receiving.

If the public heard teachers complaining about things that genuinely put the kids first, they would get behind a pay increase and wouldn’t mind paying higher taxes for a superior product. Right now, the public doesn’t care that teachers work after hours, many of them are are well. They don’t care that they can’t afford their health care insurance, as most families are struggling to get by as well, why should a teacher be any different?

Teachers have lost sight of the children and appear laser focused on themselves, and until the reverse happens, the public won’t get behind the unions or the teachers that complain and say that they are for the children when their actions clearly show something else.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
10:10 pm

@ d

I would have settled for seeing the freezes applied equally to everyone. at GPC while we were told no raises for the 4th (5th) straight year, management was still traveling, getting raises, promoting unnecessary personal social agendas

its interesting to me how anyone else pushes for a raise, they are being good capitalists. us-greedy.

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
10:11 pm

@ d, the city of Chicago is broke, like many municipalities, and you can’t get blood from a stone. It would be cheaper for the city to close all of the schools and turn them into Charter schools, making the teachers use the charter school salary scale, often much less than that of CPS. Many Americans have had to take pay cuts to keep a job, and would love to have a 1% pay increase, or even the security of a tenure teacher. The day before election day, many hard working engineers and workers for Lockheed Martin will get a pink slip. Where will they go to get a job? Who will hire them? I am sure that if you talked to these individuals that they would gladly do without a raise to keep their job. Teachers really don’t understand the economy and what many others are going through to keep a roof over their head and food on the table. I have no sympathy, as $80,000 goes a long way in Chicago even with a family.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
10:20 pm

@ teacher reader

you make valid points, but your points have another side to them.

-I don’t know about Chi, but here we have taken pay cuts.
-most educational professionals do NOT have tenure.
-if the people at Lockheed KNOW they are gonna be laid off, they need to be job hunting full speed. and like many of the rest of us, they may have to take a less prestigious, lower paying job.
-teachers, like the rest of the work, have their own bills to pay

to claim anyone who have lived thru the last five years doesn’t understand the economy is either a rank troll or rank ignorant. maybe a mix of both.

bootney farnsworth

September 23rd, 2012
10:24 pm

@ teacher

ok, you fall in the troll category.

if you haven’t heard us yelling about the constraints and policies which interfere with teaching, its simply because you haven’t bothered to hear it.

and for the record, I don’t give a damn about the masses. the masses didn’t want the American Revolution. they did, however, lynch Leo Frank. brutally put, the masses have done squat for me-I reciprocate.

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
10:39 pm

Bootney, you sound like a bitter old man.

As a teacher, I want children to receive a better education than they currently are. I spoke up and was called a trouble maker in DeKalb. I left, because I couldn’t teach my students the way that I wanted my child to be taught and am not two faced to send my son to private school and teach in public.

Many non-government workers who are employed are happy to have a job. Workers that have been laid off have only found jobs that are well below their skill level.

Public school teachers are well paid. They make more than the going rate that a non-government job would provide them. Why do private school teachers make significantly less and provide children with a much superior product? It’s not because children are rich, it’s because these teachers teach and don’t teach to a test.

As a former public school teacher, it would take significant improvements for my child to attend any public school, because I understand the purpose of public schools is really to create useful idiots and I want much more for my child.

I’m no troll. I want our public schools to be giving our children a better product, and am tired of hearing teachers wanting to be called professionals, yet fail to act professional or demand to deliver a better product.

I understand the ills of education, but all that I hear from teachers, is that their pay isn’t enough or fair, but then turn around and say that they are for the kids. That is just BS!

d

September 23rd, 2012
10:39 pm

@Teaxher Reader, I did not get into this profession to become wealthy, but at the same time, I don’t intend to enter the poor house because of it. We have reduced the number of teachers in classrooms around this country, and both students and the teachers left behind suffer. Classrooms aren’t able to handle this number of students. How can science teachers really do labs with 40 kids? How can English teachers really grade 180 essays the way they should be? Who suffers? Not superintendents who make more than the governor and state superintendent combined or the one who will get about $320,000 from TRS annually when he finally retires. I, on the other hand, will state my salary case bluntly. I still show up, I still do my best, but there’s a lot I can’t do when I can barely move around the classroom or buy supplies for interesting activities. I am in my 8th year teaching. I make $300 more than a brand new teacher who walked in the door this year with my same credentials. I earn about 3 or 4% less than I did in 2008-2009 before furloughs started. Inflation since then has been about 8%. My benefits are nearly 30% higher, my TRS contribution has increased. DCSD has not provided any retirement or social security payments to me ever. Am I frustrated, absolutely. Have I changed jobs? No. There is something more important to me. It’s the student who was on his own at graduation and didn’t have any appropriate clothes for graduation day thanking me for helping him get the appropriate attire. It’s the student who drove me crazy when he was in my room knocking on my door to tell me he did better than most of his peers in a college level economics course because of the foundation I provided to him in high school economics. It’s the students who come to me and say they want for me to write them a recommendation to my alma mater because they come to appreciate how I developed there. How long can one be expected to keep this up when money is being wasted by central offices, funding out of state corporations for work that can be done locally and inject much needed money into the local economy?

RAMZAD

September 23rd, 2012
10:53 pm

This is all well and good,

however, parents are asking for results. Our communities are asking for results and the country is asking for results from the public education process. The notion that somehow the society is being cheeky to ask that teacher advancement be tied to student performance is patently offensive
to all those who have a child in public schoosl- teachers included.

An engineer whose bridges get people killed would be out of bridge building business in short order. I make no distinction for teachers whose students can’t read…excuses of poverty or crime or whatever be damned. If they show up educate them. They are not there because they like riding the great yellow bus.

This war, yes; war, is not over. Privatization of public education is an option that we as voters, parents, employers, and citizens can not ignore, should not ignore and will not ignore.
Departments of education are supposed to be in the education business not in feathering the
nests of people who are proving time and time again not to be doing even a good job of educating our young people.

Ed Johnson

September 23rd, 2012
10:54 pm

Dr. Monica Henson, at one moment you generalize then the next moment you get defensively specific. Yours is an interesting behavior.

Kindly schedule a day and time for me to visit 100 Edgewood Ave sometimes after mid-December. I will be much unavailable until then. Please e-mail your invitation to me at edwjohnson@aol.com with a cc to edjohnson@qisincorp.com.

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
10:58 pm

@ D, if you care so much about the children, why aren’t you speaking out? Why are you staying quiet? I don’t want to hear that you are quiet to keep your job. If teachers really wanted to give students a better product and spoke out, parents would stand behind you. Parents won’t stand behind you if all they hear are teachers complaining about what they aren’t making as far as salaries.

TRS has increased, because you were never putting in enough to begin with. Look at how much you put in and what you’ll take out, and the two numbers don’t add up. Pension funds can’t stay at such low levels of contribution and give such high out put and remain in effect for everyone. Hopefully the stock market won’t go belly up, so that you have a pension, as your pension money is tied to the stock market and how well it does.

If you don’t like your salary, aren’t willing to speak up to make education more focused on teaching to the children and providing a quality education, than you really need to get out of the classroom. Charter schools are the way of the future, as is school choice. Parents don’t care how much you get paid, they care about the quality of education their children receive. Right now, my taxes are paying for a much better product than the children are receiving and the teachers sit quiet and only speak out about their poor salaries.

The public doesn’t care if you can pay your bills. Do you care if we can pay ours, with the tax increases? We want a top notch product first, and then we can talk about raising our taxes and paying more. I understand that administrators salaries keep going up, but again, why do you and other teachers who “care about the kids” remain silent?

We don’t care that you effected one child’s life. We want our children’s life to be effected by quality instruction. So often our children are effected negatively by teachers or only have one or two good teachers for the time that we are in public schools.

As a former teacher, I find your arguments BS, and hope that teachers who say that they care about the children start acting like they do.

d

September 23rd, 2012
11:03 pm

@Teacher Reader, who says I haven’t and won’t continue to do so. My current moniker here dates to times before I had the protection of fair dismissal, but believe me, I have spoken many times about these sues and will continue to do so.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
11:10 pm

“You see, I never made excuses for my students. I taught them were they were and kept on going. I knew that being one of two or three white teachers in an all black school, I had to prove myself. I taught my students the way that I would want my child to be taught. ”

You might be surprised by how many teachers in Georgia are trying to do exactly that. The problem is, even if you teach a child “where he is” the ultimate measure of success is the standardized test score. Even in your years as a public school teacher, you had to answer to some form of that. Teaching a child where he is should be the ultimate plan for any teacher, and surely you didn’t magically get them all to proficiency in a year. I think unlike you, there are many who have stayed in the profession who are still trying to get past that point. I think you’d be surprised at how many there are in many places. What bothers me in your posts here is the continued blaming of teachers. We’re not all like what you think. Your experience doesn’t reflect the entire profession.

I don’t think anyone here is making excuses for the kids. It’s reality, as you surely know, that they have lives outside our building that greatly influence who they are and what they become, either positively or negatively. I teach every child as if he/she were my own, but how can I keep them from joining gangs or becoming criminals? Some of those I’ve worked the hardest with over the years are now in the prison system. One I recall graduated and within two weeks was arrested for armed robbery. The school isn’t responsible for that. That’s not an excuse- it’s reality. Education reform is one side of the equation, and a VERY important one. I agree with you that it’s a broken system, but we have to see the other side of that equation- the communities the produce the children. Both sides have to be fighting and held just as accountable if we’re ever going to really “fix” anything.

d

September 23rd, 2012
11:12 pm

And, @teacher reader, if pay doesn’t start going up, who are you going to expect to teach children at any school, public, private or whatever. Basic supply and demand will keep the highly qualified people from ever entering the field and will drive the experienced out. Do you honestly think if there weren’t a minimum wage, anyone would pay the cashier at McDonalds $7.25 an hour? Does that job require that much education? Of course not, but mine does. If you want highly qualified people in front of any classroom, you have to pay based on the human capital that person has developed. Do you think new teachers will enter the field in 2020 if pay is still at 2007 levels? So forgive my BS argument, But I can fight for both children and myself and still be a great teacher.

Dekalbite@bootney

September 23rd, 2012
11:12 pm

“what a stupid, stupid, stupid , stupid letter.

to pretend the Chicago strike was anything other than them using the leverage they had to force monetary and workplace concessions is just plain ignorant. Chicago didn’t give a damn about anything beyond their own borders or they’d still be out.”

Here are two concessions they fought for:
Reasonable class sizes
The right to write their own lesson plans

Anyone who has taught in a classroom knows that these components are critical in the learning process.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
11:14 pm

RAMZAD: Are you ready to become one of the new and improved teachers in the state run charter schools system that is coming? Are you willing to get in there and make a difference or just sit back and offer more opinions of who’s to blame? Get in there and do the job and show us how to do it better. If you succeed, you can make a fortune off the books and professional development conferences once you prove your expert level of ability.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
11:16 pm

“many of the tactics used by Mao’s followers are very similar to the “solutions” offered up by the Franbots”

Sad, but true. What’s the saying about those who don’t know history being doomed to repeat it?

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
11:27 pm

@ d, private schools pay significantly less and manage to hire quality individuals just fine. I’m really not concerned about raising teacher pay, until quality comes up.

If you understood how to show growth, you’d know that you take a look at the child’s scores from the previous year and see how much growth they made at the end of the next year. It’s a very simple calculation to do, and EVERY child should show growth. Trouble is that we keep passing kids on with no expectations, and that is a very different problem. In Chicago, students were automatically held back for missing a certain number of days of school. Also, students were held accountable for their test scores and kept back in 3rd, 5th, and 8th grade when their scores didn’t make the cut off. When is the last time that has happened in DCSS?

Teachers should be concerned about the profession of teaching and speak out time and time again. Go to board meetings, get to the media and talk about quality of education and not teacher pay.

You really don’t get it. I DON’T CARE HOW MUCH YOU MAKE. I CARE THAT MY CHILD AND ALL CHILDREN ARE TAUGHT AND RECEIVE A QUALITY EDUCATION. This isn’t happening and hasn’t happened from what I can tell for some time in many parts of the country. Until the quality of the product comes up, than the pay can increase.

Teachers receive a very nice pension for their service after 30 years. Not many people have this perk. I know, I know, you paid into your pension fund-not nearly enough sir, not nearly enough. This is not your fault, but if you consider yourself smart, than you should be able to do the math and realize that this isn’t sustainable and be concerned about your future, especially if you are young (under 50).

I don’t care what workers in Mc Donalds are paid. I have a choice to pay the price for food there or not. I don’t have a choice in paying my taxes. I work hard for my money, and frankly am tired of sending them to DCSS and seeing the inferior product our children are receiving at even the “good” schools.

I don’t think you understand that the public really does not care about your salary. Until you and other teachers realize that constantly talking about how much you make while saying that you care about the kids but are much less vocal and tenacious about showing how focus on improving the education children receive, you will never have the majority of the public backing you up.

The real issues are the lack of education our children are receiving not the size of a teacher’s pay check. I know many people with a teaching degree but are not able to get a job, who would gladly take your job just to do what they went to school for. That is what you and other teachers need to know. There is no teacher shortage and there are many that are just as qualified as you, to take your place.

Teacher Reader

September 23rd, 2012
11:31 pm

Ron F. There is no teacher shortage in America, and many with a teaching degree would be glad to take your spot or work in a charter school. Having worked in a charter school and in public schools, charter schools offer a much better teaching environment if your true goal is to teach and not complain about how much you do/don’t make.

Also, one doesn’t need a teaching certificate to be a good teacher. One needs to be a life long learner, a quality few teachers possess. One must enjoy learning for learning’s sake and spark that interest in their students.

You, and other teachers, are a dime a dozen. All of the Chicago Teachers could have been fired and the district could have easily found teachers yearning to get their foot in the door to take their place all over America. That is something that a teacher complaining about their salary needs to understand, but it’s a difficult concept to understand when you feel entitled to what you think you deserve.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
11:36 pm

“Until the quality of the product comes up, than the pay can increase.”

If you really ever were a teacher, you’d know how ridiculous and oversimplied that statement is. Makes a nice bumper sticker, but how can the “quality of the product” be so set and determined when the materials to create it are of such varying quality? Teaching never has been or ever will be that simple. Every kids deserves a quality education; they should have the right to that. But does every kid want it? Does every kid choose to be educated and see the absolute necessity of it? No, and there’s no method yet that has reached 100% of them. Once again, you can’t put all the blame on teachers when the communities themselves have so many real, immediate needs. You can’t ignore those needs and problems. Those are not excuses- those are realities. Just as it’s a reality that some schools are just plain bad. Some, not all, but we’ll do away with even the good ones in favor of charters and taxpayer funded vouchers soon enough anyway. And doing away with them all and touting “choice” isn’t the whole solution and you know it.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
11:46 pm

“Also, one doesn’t need a teaching certificate to be a good teacher. One needs to be a life long learner, a quality few teachers possess. One must enjoy learning for learning’s sake and spark that interest in their students.

You, and other teachers, are a dime a dozen.”

Now I know you never were a teacher, or you got some really bad reviews and quit a bitter, disgusted, idealist who probably quit midyear after going off on some kid for asking to go to the bathroom one too many times.

At the rate you and yours are going, a dime a dozen is about all you’ll be able to afford to pay anyway, and you’ll get what you pay for. You have no idea how hard I work or that I work with at-risk kids all day. I have for many years, and will continue to no matter the opinion of anonymous naysayers. I haven’t complained about pay in this thread, as it’s not germane to the discussion anyway. My pay is what it is, and complaining isn’t going to change it. I love teaching, and as you say I share that love for learning with my kids. That alone isn’t enough to reach all of them, and it breaks my heart each time one leaves or I read about another being arrested for whatever crime. I do the absolute best I can, but I’m one human being out of many my kids encounter, and the success of my influence happens when the kids decide it’s more important than what their friends say to them. The world offers a siren song of potentially disastrous promises my communication of a love for learning can’t always overcome.

You should consider coming back once the new charter schools are in place. I’m sure your idealism will fit nicely within their framework. Maybe you’ll become the next Michelle Rhee and start a foundation to promote your bitterness as the next big thing to fix the system. Sure has worked good for her, and her classroom history wasn’t exactly stellar from what I’ve read.

Ron F.

September 23rd, 2012
11:55 pm

Teacher Reader: just so you know, I’m actually grateful to have my taxpayer funded salary, as good or bad as it gets, and that changes year to year since the recession hit. I don’t think I “deserve” anything if my kids aren’t succeeding. I demand the best of myself first and then the kids. I’m not entitled to anything but the privilege to spend my days with some of the most challenging and most wonderful, loving kids you could ask for, despite their behavior some days and puzzling lack of abilities most days. I don’t just go to work to teach, I live to teach. Sadly, I don’t know how much longer that will continue as the pressure to perform builds. More tests, more goals, more tightly controlled curricula, and less and less chance to just get kids thinking and problem solving about things they can relate to and value. But I keep trying and believing the possibilities for my kids while I prepare for the often painful reality of the choices some of them make that ruin their lives. It’s like losing a member of my own family, but sooner or later they have to head out there and make those choices, and a few do.

It’s a calling by the way, not a job, but like any profession you’ll lower quality if you lower pay too much. That’s a tough balance to find.

bootney farnsworth

September 24th, 2012
7:15 am

show of hand of folks who have suspicions teacher reader has actually taught in public school

bootney farnsworth

September 24th, 2012
7:19 am

I love the part where T/R says she doesn’t care how much we make, she wants results.

capitalism 101- you get what you pay for.

mommamonster

September 24th, 2012
8:07 am

Those of you yelling about teachers’ greed please understand that Chicago teachers were forced to “lead” with pay because

(quoted from http://www.catalyst-chicago.org/notebook/2012/09/16/20427/mayor-wants-injunction-stop-strike-union-wants-more-time-consider-deal)

A provision added to the Illinois Educational Labor Relations Act last year says Chicago teachers can strike only over pay and benefits.

They had NO choice but to cite pay and benefits as their main reasons for striking…I think that’s the way the legislation can automatically garner negative feelings toward teachers even before the stike begins. I wish we teachers in GA had the guts to really use our voices for change…we’re all too scared in this blood-red state to fight for a decent salary and classroom conditions…

mommamonster

September 24th, 2012
8:16 am

Mortimer Collins

September 24th, 2012
9:01 am

What a load of manure.

RAMZAD

September 24th, 2012
9:30 am

I can see that some of the teachers here are living a professional illusion. How can a young person graduate high school and not be able to build or recognize a decent sentence in the English language? This is a student who has been coming to school day after day. Forget the poverty argument that you all have on repeat play. They show up!

Just how can that be? We are also talking about thousands of cases in one school district who can’t break down an argument and take out the piece that we need to answer a simple question.

In any other profession we would have declared a national emergency or start a war to deal with this problem. Forget math and history and civics. Just teach them to read and write. The teacher profession is a very honorable calling, but it is clear that for too many of you it is just a paycheck to produce illiterates. My respect for public school teachers is disappearing below zero.

Prof

September 24th, 2012
10:34 am

@ Teacher Reader. If Georgian educators don’t know much about the specifics of the Chicago Public Schools and the Chicago Teachers Union, then you don’t seem to know much about the situation of Georgian K-12 teachers which is quite different. The pay scale here is considerably lower than in Chicago precisely BECAUSE unions are not allowed by the state constitution. And on and on.

From what you write, you have 6 years teaching in one South side Chicago elementary school in the second grade, as nearly the only white teacher in a school and area that is otherwise black. How can you possibly generalize then about all Chicago public schools and all of the teachers within them, unionized or not? Could part of their response to your teaching method be due to your own attitude of superiority toward them. which is shown in several of your posts here?

Frankly, I don’t accept your statements about the Chicago teachers and their union any more than I do the Georgia educators who wrote the “thank-you letter to Chicago teachers.”

Just A Teacher

September 24th, 2012
11:36 am

It seems that there are many people dissatisfied with public education in Georgia. Some people have claimed that teachers here want to maintain the status quo in education. These people want radical change to our education system here. Wouldn’t repealing the laws against collective bargaining for teachers be a radical change. Georgia would then join the ranks of many of the states whose standardized test scores exceed ours.

Once Again

September 24th, 2012
12:40 pm

1) empowering educators to reclaim their workplace and professionalism, 2) empowering families to stand up for their children and shape the institutions their children attend each day, 3) empowering children and youth to have control over their education, and 4) enhancing the education of all Georgians.

There is not a single one of these goals that can ever be achieved until the government socialist monopoly on “education” is ended. While I will certainly agree that turning over the government monopoly to a private company to reap the financial rewards of the existing socialist financing scheme is absolutely wrong, there is no way that parents or children will ever have a sound chance at shaping the instituitons or controlling their education until FULL responsiblity (both for paying and for choosing) is put back into the hands of parents where it rightfully belongs. Even teachers are disenfranchised by the current system as their is no incentive to innovate, there are no rewards for outstanding performance, poor performance is rewarded with more money (both at the teacher and system level), and ultimately these conditions of failure promote ridicule and scorn among the victimized parents and children that is directed at the face of their education – the teachers.

Nobody likes having to face the realities of the competitive marketplace, but only the marketplace delivers the highest quality by providing the external financial and competitive pressures that generate innovation and success. Government never has to worry about those things so they fail without concern.

Whomever this group really is, they have only one concern in mind – their own. They clearly do not care about quality teachers, quality education, or the parents and children. They support the status quo that receives funding through force and fights even simple changes and accountability as if they were the actions of the devil himself.

Parents are finally waking up to this chronic injustice. They are pulling their children from the govenrment institutions. Hopefully many in Chicago will learn from this experience and save their children by getting them out, one way or another. The “victory” in Chicago for the “teachers” was a loss for all americans. On the brighter side however, these unsustainable financial arrangements cannot last, and soon all of these government programs will come crashing down. At that point, those who actually care about their children’s education will hopefully be given the freedom to create a new system that actually addresses their children’s needs without financially victimizing them to benefit others.

Beverly Fraud

September 24th, 2012
1:10 pm

“QSo be careful implying, insinuating, or otherwise suggesting John Q Public is too stupid to know or to learn what’s going on.”

@Ed, John Q. Public might not be too stupid to know what’s going on, but they ARE too ignorant to know what’s going on. WILLFULLY ignorant, seeing as more of them will take the time to know the judges on American Idol than take the time to know the ones that sit on the Supreme Court.

And that’s why teachers need to SHAPE THE DEBATE. They need to counteract the Rhee/Duncan/et al rhetoric with their own easily understood soundbite, just to have a fighting chance to get people to the nuance of it all.

And if a TEACHER can’t put a message in a bite sized chunk, easily understood by the masses…

Dr. Monica Henson

September 24th, 2012
1:45 pm

Mr. Johnson, I’ll email you an invitation today. I look forward to meeting you in person and hope that you will find my behavior acceptable. :) I’ll even treat you to lunch.

Thanks for being willing to take a look.

Monica

Dr. Monica Henson

September 24th, 2012
1:49 pm

Oh dear, Mr. Johnson, it looks like you are a computer information systems expert. That may explain your difficulty in following my nonlinear thinking. Please be patient with this old maid schoolteacher. I do think that when you take a look at our school, you’ll be pleased with what you see.

I love teaching. I hate what it is becoming...

September 24th, 2012
7:13 pm

@Teacher reader “The general public is tired of teachers complaining about their salaries. As a former teacher, I am tired of hearing teachers complain about their salaries. I want to hear teachers complain about not being able to teach. Or about the lack of discipline in our schools. Or teaching to a test. Or other problems that generally affect the quality of education our children are receiving. ”

I fail to understand how you can make this comment if you have been reading this blog for any length of time. MOST of us complain MUCH MORE about those issues you mentioned, rather than salary. You make is sound soooo easy for teachers to stand up and say…”I will no longer teach to the test! I will no longer spend weeks giving standardized tests! I insist discipline problems be removed from my room!” Yet, if you truly are a former teacher, you have to know it does NOT work that way – especially in a state with no union protection. Do those things bother us? You bet they do! But realistically, we have very little power to change it. I do everything I can within the restrictive confines I am forced to endure, but again, chages of that magnitude need to come from higher up. Perhaps some of this passion being used to push for Charter schools and vouchers by ‘reformers” would be better spent “reforming” some of the problems you mentioned!

And no, many of us are not a “dime a dozen.” I suspect Ron F. is a great educator from his comments on this blog. He is the kind of teacher you should be supporting, not tearing down due to your unhappy experiences in the CPS years ago or because your husband got the short end of the stick in the private sector. I taught in some pretty corrupt, pathetic districts myself. Fortunately, even there I encountered hard working, caring, dedicated teachers. I am sorry you apparently did not, and have drawn conclusions about the entire profession based upon those negative experiences.

“You really don’t get it. I DON’T CARE HOW MUCH YOU MAKE. I CARE THAT MY CHILD AND ALL CHILDREN ARE TAUGHT AND RECEIVE A QUALITY EDUCATION. ”

And therein lies one of the greatest problems in this country. Everyone is in it for himself or herself, and screw everyone else. There is no “We the people…” anymore, or community spirit. No sense of working together or looking out for one another. It has all become about ME, ME, ME! If I can’t pay my bills, I can’t support my students. I can’t buy supplies for those who have parents out of work. (Because, yes, I actually do care whether YOU can pay your bills – surprise!) Every person who falls through the cracks weakens our society. I can’t continue to teach if my salary drops too low. I do have to pay my bills, whether you care or not. So the public loses another good teacher…and since you are so certain most teachers are mediocre at best, I do not understand your statement that good teachers can so easily be replaced. (And yes, I am a good teacher.)

P.S. You might want to brush up on the difference between “effect” and “affect.”

Prof

September 24th, 2012
8:43 pm

Reading back through Teacher Reader’s comments, I notice that his/her style changes from one of commiseration with teachers to that of the same old teacher-bashing that has become so familiar–and dull- on this blog since the out-of-state paid trolls discovered “Get Schooled.” I also notice that he/she has been absent from the discussion since last night at 11:31 pm, and isn’t answering any of the retorts by local teachers.

Ed Johnson

September 24th, 2012
9:04 pm

“Oh dear, Mr. Johnson, it looks like you are a computer information systems expert. That may explain your difficulty in following my nonlinear thinking.”

Dr. Monica Hanson, what nonlinear thinking of yours? Please do point out on this blog an example of your nonlinear thinking since obviously I missed it the first go round.

Believe me, I much esteem nonlinear thinkers, some of the more popular ones being W. Edwards Deming, Russell Ackoff, Donnella Meadows, Donald Wheeler, Alfie Kohn, Peter Senge, Jesus, Martin Luther King, Jr. and other “Systems Thinkers.” I’m sure these folks are known to you, yes?

Anyway, since it seems you’ve bothered to check me out, here’s something more… http://www.edjohnsoninseat9.com. It’s an old school board campaign site.

Looking forward to receiving your invitation to visit.

Dr. Monica Henson

September 24th, 2012
10:22 pm

Invitation sent. Thanks for the link, and I look forward to meeting you!

20/20

September 25th, 2012
1:36 pm

Where is Beverly Hall and when is she going to court to be held accountable for unethical actions along with Kathy Augustine and others????????

20/20

September 25th, 2012
1:48 pm

How many awsuits does Atlanta Public Schools have pending under Erroll Davis? He is clueless and worse than Beverly Hall. He is horrible and costing taxpayers greatly while the dysfuntional board of education stands by doing nothing as before. Enroll needs to good home to rest. That is why he is so gouchy in old age. At least Hall was a knowlegeable educator.