Is a longer school year a reform worth considering? Or, is the cost too much and the payoff too little?

While 170 schools around the country have added school days, some Georgia students are returning to shorter schools years, a consequence of budget cuts. (AP Image)

While 170 schools around the country have added school days, some Georgia students are returning to shorter schools years, a consequence of budget cuts. (AP Image)

With some Georgia districts adopting a shorter school year to cope with budget cuts, I thought this New York Times story on the opposite trend was worth sharing.

The National Center on Time and Learning, a nonprofit research group in Boston, reports that about 170 schools — most of them charters — have extended their calendars to 190 days or longer, according to the Times story.

Here is an excerpt but try to read the full piece in the Times:

A growing group of education advocates is agitating for more time in schools, arguing that low-income children in particular need more time to catch up as schools face increasing pressure to improve student test scores. “It’s not as simple as ‘Oh, if we just went 12 hours every kid would be Einstein,’ ” said Chris Gabrieli, chairman of the Boston group. “On the other hand, the more time you spend practicing or preparing to do something, the better you get at it.”

Education advocates have been calling for more school time at least since the 1983 “Nation at Risk” report presented an apocalyptic vision of American education. Teachers’ unions, parents who want to preserve summers for family vacations and those who worry that children already come under too much academic stress argue that extended school time is not the answer. Research on longer school days or years also shows mixed results.

But studies also show that during the summer break, students — particularly those from low-income families — tend to forget what they learned in the school year. Getting back to school early, supporters of a longer calendar say, is one of the best ways to narrow an achievement gap between rich and poor students. Many charter schools, including those in the academically successful KIPP network, attribute their achievement in part to longer days and calendars.

Advocates of longer school years say that the 180-day school year is an outdated artifact. “The fact that our calendar has been based on the agrarian economy when almost none of our kids work in the field anymore,” said Arne Duncan, secretary of education, “doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.”

Yet several recent efforts to lengthen the school calendar have foundered. The Woodland Hills Academy in Pittsburgh extended its school year to 195 days in 2009, but this year it will return to the traditional 180-day calendar because of state budget cuts. Similarly, Parkside Elementary in Coral Springs, Fla., tried a 200-day calendar for one year before abandoning it because of insufficient financing.

Critics say that with so many schools already failing, giving them more time would do little to help students. “It is true that we have an unfair society, and it is true that kids who are coming from the poorer backgrounds and whose parents don’t do a lot of reading are losing reading skills over the summer,” said Peter Gray, research professor of psychology at Boston College. “But let’s look at other solutions.” He added, “Whatever job we give to the school system, they ruin it.”

Advocates say that schools need to plan carefully how they will use the extra time. Some say that adding the kinds of art, music and other activities that more affluent students typically get outside school is as important as beefing up academics.

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

80 comments Add your comment

Beverly Fraud

August 6th, 2012
4:52 pm

Why is it I can picture Arne Duncan, Beverly Hall, Michelle Rhee, Rod Paige, Herb Garrett, and some mouthpiece from the NEA at a round table saying:

“You’re for the children”

“No YOU’RE for the children”

“No, but you’re REALLY for the children”

Until they all pass out in some communal ecstasy?

Ron F.

August 6th, 2012
4:55 pm

Old Timer is right: you gotta sell those who need the extra time on the idea of it. They need it but don’t understand what the extra instructional time in the summer could do for them. As I’ve said before, if we talk to them instead of about them, I bet we could get more of them to agree to it. I would be willing to work the extra 20 days or so if it meant I could have the small classes with very individualized instruction. I’ve taught “summer school” for many years and have been allowed to work with the struggling kids in that setting on specific needed skills. The challenge is getting the parents to realize that it is a very important time for their kids. The extra pay would be a nice bonus for doing what I love too!

Beverly Fraud

August 6th, 2012
4:58 pm

Let’s not forget Kathy Cox, who was MORE than willing to embrace “miracle” test scores, in order to validate HER paycheck.

She was really, REALLY “all about the children”

Beverly Fraud

August 6th, 2012
5:04 pm

Yes, yes, yes, this is the answer. Just look at the recent discovery of the “God Particle”

You think top of the line physicists discovered it?

God no! It was a bunch of 2nd graders. On day 178, they were struggling to identify parts of the atom. But on day one hundred eighty ONE, they discovered Higgs-Boson!

They let the scientists claim the credit, because NEA agents pressured them into doing so, because they were so fearful the public would find out just how beneficial extra school days were.

Those d@mn unions! Satan’s spawn for sure.

Halftrack

August 6th, 2012
5:17 pm

A longer school year means more costs all around for the taxpayers to have to pay. The current school year includes too many inclement weather days, fall & spring breaks, Holiday season & individual holiday days, and teacher work days. Schools could use the summer to shorten the time until graduation by advanced grade subject teaching. Colleges in Georgia are now trying to figure out how the best method of remedial classes can be addressed. Also, it may be that teachers are looking for a way to get a raise without much extra output to the student’s benefit. I think that energy costs are going to go up and we will be forced to make some decisions that we don’t want to make anyway.

TheGoldenRam

August 6th, 2012
5:33 pm

I’m on both sides of this issue.

I think it’s both beneficial to a lot of the students to have a longer school year/year-round school, but that’s because it’s essentially a babysitting/childcare service. You’re just mitigating all the other ‘real’ issues that are dragging these kids down. Until our society can have very candid discussions about those issues, this will be just another band-aid with limited results. I put it in the same category as Universal Pre-K. Government can’t figure out how to solve parental deficiency, cultural failings and a lack of community accountability, so it tries to fill the ‘gaps’ with these educational add-ons.

Bernie noted something in a post on a previous story that I was already going to address. I also tuned in to watch the live broadcast of the Curiosity Rover landing on Mars last night. That was AWESOME to see. The scientific and engineering prowess that made that possible is beyond impressive. If I had my way, I’d make ever channel break coverage to show that live. It has it all. History in the making, a profoundly inspiring demonstration of human achievement & a great sense of patriotism, all rolled into one event.

I was struck by how young so many of the engineers and personnel in the control room looked. A lot of those men & women must be in their twenties and early thirties. These are young people at the top of the scientific game. Again, really impressive to see. However, I too noticed that there was only one older black face in a broadcast that showed a lot of participants. There was a lot of diversity in that room, but I couldn’t help but think that this was another glaring example of how a certain demographic is always so scarce in these venues. I’ve noticed the same thing in many of the other documentaries I’ve watched about space exploration, engineering projects, scientific discoveries, etc.. I’m a junkie for those shows. There is rarely a black person in the room and almost invariably when there is, they have a strong foreign accent. African Americans are like unicorns in these high-level fields. In other words, they’re almost non-existent.

I wondered who that older black gentleman was, so I looked him up today. His name is Charles Bolden and it turns out he is the Administrator of NASA. He is THE boss and he has a very impressive resume. Graduated from the Naval Academy, fighter pilot in Vietnam and advanced science degrees. He was also a four time astronaut. One of his flights launched the Hubble.

What a surreal contrast. A black man, born & raised in South Carolina, who graduated high school in the same year as the passage of the Civil Rights Amendment, is now the head of the most prestigious space program on the planet(sad irony, his Alma mater is now considered one of the worst public schools in South Carolina based on test scores and the drop-out rate. It is 98% African American.).

I would argue that there is another distinction regarding Maj. Gen. Bolden that had more influence on his remarkable lifetime of achievement than anything else. He was born to a married couple that were both TEACHERS. He was a child of committed parents that were educators. I find the same thing when I look up the bios of so many other highly successful people. The black kid from my Alma mater that was recently named as a Rhodes Scholar. Again, high achieving mom AND dad involved throughout his upbringing.

This isn’t rocket science, even when it is. There is only so much society and government can compensate for a culture of parental failure and abandonment. Teachers would be well served to publicly concede what we all know. You can’t fix these problems, nor should they be your problems. To do otherwise is to tie your professional destiny to impossible outcomes.

I’ll close with this example that puts this problem in stark relief.

One of the absolute worst public school systems in the United States is the Memphis City School system, the largest in Tennessee. There are about 100,000 students in this system. Of MCS ‘graduates’, only about 4% are deemed college-ready. They spend more that $11,000 per student. The ancillary social service and other ‘intervention’ programs involved in that system go on & on & on. None of it makes a substantial difference in the collective outcomes. The reason why is in plain sight.

An editorial in the Commercial Appeal from several weeks ago talked about a 3rd-party company that had been brought in to deal with the city’s woeful child support problems.

From the story, “As of May, it’s juggling a stunning 117,455 cases in Shelby County. In more than 50,000 of those cases, the office is still trying to locate the father or establish paternity.”

Good luck with longer days, longer classes, more remediation, “Waiting for Superman”, charter schools or anything else. Until we can address the underlying disintegration of family/social/community values that are the real cause of broad academic failings, we have a better chance of finding poor, minority kids ON Mars, then seeing them heading into a science program getting us there.

Teacher Reader

August 6th, 2012
5:37 pm

If the state wants to spend more money on education, lowering the class sizes, is where I’d rather see money spent.

Status Quo Schedule O.K.

August 6th, 2012
5:49 pm

The existing schedule is adequate enough for students
to achieve, but if increased instructional time is the
goal, students can gain the same amount of instructional
time by adding thirty to forty-five minutes a day on the
existing academic schedule.

Derwood

August 6th, 2012
6:06 pm

To salvage education in America we must first dissolve the Dept of Education in Washington. THye have no idea whatt do with education circulium.

Megan

August 6th, 2012
6:21 pm

What a dumb idea. We do not have the money to support 180 days as it is now.

BlahBlahBlah

August 6th, 2012
6:24 pm

School should be “year ’round.” 4 quarters a year. 11 weeks on, 2 weeks off.

testerbill

August 6th, 2012
6:35 pm

If a three month break is too long, consider the Quarter system. 3 months of school, 1 month off. Works well in some areas of the country

HSTeach

August 6th, 2012
6:42 pm

They can’t afford to pay teachers now, let alone a longer school year. I heard from a 28 year vet that their new evaluation will be 33% performance, 33% student test scores and 33% student/parent feedback. Now that’s the way to evaluate a professional! Do we pay doctors based on whether the patient feels they were knowledgeable? Or ask lawyers to be paid based on the percentage of cases they win? On another note, they have been told their curriculum is moving to scripted lessons, which should really help this almost 30 year professional feel that her experience is valued.

dekalbed

August 6th, 2012
6:51 pm

Until school districts like Dekalb commit to teaching students how to function successfully as citizens and students it doesn’t matter how many hours struggling students spend in schools. And no amount of edutainment can compensate for the absence of critical reading and thinking skills-thre real reason why students “forget what they [supposedly] learned.”

SayWhat

August 6th, 2012
6:58 pm

Forget costs and all the other hoopla – KIDS NEED A SUMMER VACATION!! It’s already been cut to two months.

living in an outdated ed system

August 6th, 2012
8:41 pm

@Catlady et al – I am laughing out loud too. I’m laughing at everyone commenting on this blog that keeps saying “we can’t afford 180 days so why are we having this discussion?” If we fixed our outdated education system and streamlined the bloated infrastructure, we’d have PLENTY of money to do what we we wanted. But you are all unwilling to have that conversation, and you think that everyone is out to attack public schools and teachers.

Well, if our public schools were run better and we had better achievement results and graduation rates, we wouldn’t have to have this discussion, now would we ?????

Animal187

August 6th, 2012
8:54 pm

Regardless of how long the school year is, if the parnets do not encourage their kids to read, study, or prepare for the upcomming year they will never be prepared. I encourage my daughter to read during the summer months, she also does activitiy books for the next grade level, and I also go over things with her and take her on educational trips as well. A parent has to make time for their kids and show an interest in their education in order for them to take an interest as well. She is only in the 2nd grade but she already told me that she wants to go to college.

Mama S

August 6th, 2012
9:10 pm

Low income kids forget because their low income parents cannot help them to retain the information.
As a former teacher, I have “summer school” for my grandchildren K and 3rd grades. We go to the library every week and participate in the Read-A-Thon. We play school and do grade level worksheets to review concepts learned. Perfect papers earn points toward swimming time. We went to Fernbank Science Center (wanted them to see it before it was closed). We played lots of educational and fun computer games. We practiced math and measurement while baking brownies. I am not pushing then ahead, but I am sure they did not forget information. It is not the job of the school to be a 24/7 babysitter.

bootney farnsworth

August 6th, 2012
10:18 pm

@ living

and why do you think we have no interest in talking to you?
not talking to people of goodwill who are sincere in trying to fix the problems we all know exist-but not wanting to talk to you?

simple: there is nothing on earth we can say which you’ll hear. you’re not interested in a conversation, you wish to lecture than enforce.

and you claim to wonder why we aren’t interested in talking with you….

Mountain Man

August 7th, 2012
7:42 am

“If a three month break is too long, consider the Quarter system. 3 months of school, 1 month off. Works well in some areas of the country”

Why do they call it the “quarter system” when there are only three periods a year/ (3 months + 1 month= 4 months, 12months /4 months =3)
Why not call it a trimester system?

I give some credit to Blahblah blah – at least his math is sound. (not necessarily his idea).

catlady

August 7th, 2012
8:13 am

Thanks, Bootney.

Kathy

August 7th, 2012
8:55 am

It’s not the length of the school year. If we just allow teachers to teach, 180 days is plenty. Children with good parents will benefit from the extended time off. As for the others, who are we kidding? Until we stop coddling irresponsible parents, nothing’s going to change. My county is on a year-round schedule, and from what I’ve heard, it hasn’t made a whit of difference.

Pride and Joy

August 7th, 2012
9:27 am

The GoldenRam,
Having good parents makes for better outcomes but saying that having good parents determines your outcome is wrong. Dismissing children from poverty and single-parent families is silly.
For every black person who succeeded who has good parents, you can also name many who didn’t.
Oprah Winfrey came from poor, black, rurual Mississippi. She was raped at a very young age by a relative. Look what an intelligent human being she is and by all standards of measurement, happy, successful and generous.
I’m sure it is more difficult to teach childrne who don’t have good parents but not impossible. That’s a cop out.
You need to read the Lemon Swamp, a real story about educating rural blacks in South Carolina.
Every kid is teachable. Little girls in Afghanistan have acid thrown in their faces for wanting to go to school. Teachers teach girls there and are threatened with their lives.
Those are some terrible teaching conditions, yet the children learn.

Pride and Joy

August 7th, 2012
9:32 am

Mama S low income kids don’t forget what they learned over the Summer. They never learned it in the first place. They only memorized things.
Something one memorizes is the something you forget.
Something one learns is something that stays with you.
Let’s get real here. Is it possible to “forget” how to read?
Is it possible to “forget” how to ride a bicycle?
No, of course not.
However, if one is only memorizing sight words instead of learning to read, yes, one can forget the memorized sight word, which is not reading.
I had Summers off as a kid. I didn’t play and have a good time; I was required to work, physically. There was nothing academic about my job. I didn’t forget anything over the Summer and didn’t have parents who ever read to me — ever.
Blaming parents is a cop out for poor teaching.

Beverly Fraud

August 7th, 2012
11:06 am

” I didn’t forget anything over the Summer and didn’t have parents who ever read to me — ever.”

Yes Pride and Joy, but how many times during the school year did you or a classmate say “F-ck you B-tch. I ain’t doing sh-t!” and then the classmate was allow to remain in class with ZERO consequences?

Just how good do you expect teaching to be if school systems ALLOW that behavior to happen?

That’s the difference. And if we think this type of thing doesn’t happen, and doesn’t happen OFTEN, we are SERIOUSLY deluding ourselves.

Pride and Joy

August 7th, 2012
2:06 pm

Beverly, what’s your point?
If students say hostile things to the teacher, additional teacher planning time won’t solve that problem.
I get you, Beverly Fraud. You want discipline enforced in school. I hear ya and I agree but Bev, this blog is about a longer school day — stay focused please.

catlady

August 7th, 2012
5:10 pm

To me, it hinges on the magic word MASTERY. That which you MASTER, you do not forget during the summer. H3ll, you don’t forget much of it in 40 years! And if you don’t MASTER, you should be retained until you do.

hardworkingteacher

August 7th, 2012
11:38 pm

I agree with “another comment” . It is ridiculous to increase the school for everyone. Many children are going to be forced to fore go educational opportunities so we can appease the slow, low students. BTW- the system is now so slanted to accommodate those students to the detriment of the the average and above average students. Summer school would be a great experience for some students who need the extra attention.

Special Ed Reading teacher

August 11th, 2012
9:37 pm

Yeah Dr. Trotter. Many of my students need a longer year and more time to master the same material that general education students master in a year. Why? Because they need more time to understand and more time to do more of the same thing until they can remember it ( notice I was politically correct and did not say drill). I’ve been asked how many “I” failed? I didn’t fail anyone. My grades were set up so that if you acted like you were paying attention and did something you would get at the least a passing grade. Why? because we’re not allowed to fail them. Students are “administratively” placed in the next grade, even when they fail. They fall farther and farther behind. I had students this year who missed 40 – 60 days of school and passed. Beverly Fraud is also right. We’re not to embarass a student who is cheating. Shouldn’t they be embarassed and ashamed of themselves. Adults who cheat are fired, divorced, or maybe shot. We spend weeks of time in testing alone, not to mention practice tests and test prep. It seems everyday there is a new bunch of tests made up by someone somewhere for our kids. Taking more time from instruction and learning. Most kids who are happy in school also have something there they like. We have the money for football but art, music, and all of the electives, which can grow into jobs are being cut. My students asked what I did when my kids got a refferral? I said,” They didn’t. They knew better.” I don’t even know what would have happened to them because it was unacceptable and unimaginable.
Oh and by the way, during my summer break, I take workshops and classes to improve my teaching for the coming year. I buy paper and pencils and sharpeners and pens and colored pencils and colored markers, etc. with my money. I did have 2 weeks this summer that I did not have some school related free work that I did, and my 2 weeks were unpaid as is all of my time off except a few holidays, like Christmas and Thanksgiving. otherdays at those times are unpaid. I’m sure everyone out there appreciates a week without pay at Thanksgiving and 2 weeks without pay at Christmas. Get a grip. Get real disciple. Require students to turn in electronics at the door and wear school appropriate clothes that cover their bodies. Require parents to come in and sit with their children if they are a behavior problem, the Chinese do, and they have 40 or more in elementary classes. No we’re not all superman. You can’t be when you have to read someome elses words instead of teaching. We teachers are like everyone else some better than others. The teachers I know work long hours at home preparing lessons, grading papers and calling parents, if we can get a current phone number. I’ve done many different jobs over my lifetime and teaching requires the most time the most energy and is a soulsucking job. My union says it’s the hardest job you’ll ever love.

N. GA Teacher

August 14th, 2012
7:44 pm

My colleagues are right- a longer school year will make little difference for most kids. Summer school is currently a disaster in most districts, where kids are resentful (their parents made them go) and unmotivated. The fact is that most students can handle high school in a 90 day calendar! The only classes the better (say top 15%) students are challenged by are AP classes, and usually they still get As and Bs. Success in school CANNOT be achieved by lengthening the year. It has to be facilitated by HOME LIFE support and different types of schooling. Vocational schools are terrific. Schools need much more flexible curricula (do all kids REALLY need 4 years of math, social studies, English and Science?). If we REALLY want to be “student-centered” then we must encourage individual kid’s strengths and interests, whether they are art, music, physical education, technology, journamlism or construction.