Funding education excellence is a long way off in Georgia and getting farther away

Ernest sent me a link to this Education Week story about weighted student funding. He asked, “What if funding was differentiated based on need and really allowed for the dollars to follow the students?  It seems several school districts are already trying this.”

Georgia does use a weighting system in its funding formula. Under Georgia’s system, weights are reflected  as a percentage of the base. While the “average student” gets an allocation of 1.0, an English learner might get an allocation of 1.2.

But the state has never analyzed its weighting in a framework of academic achievement. Is the extra money allotted for students with special needs sufficient to assure academic success? Are we allotting enough to educate children from poor households to a standard of some sort?

The Governor’s Education Finance Task Force created by Sonny Perdue in 2004 was supposed to develop a cost model that would provide the true price of  “an excellent education.” The task force held more than 75 public meetings and discussions with 105 school systems. Yet, it did not make any recommendations on how much it would cost to educate Georgia students to the standard of excellence sought by Perdue.

The reason was that excellence costs more than anyone in Georgia is willing to spend.

In fact, the successor to the Perdue task force is the new Nathan Deal task force, which accepted from the start that excellence may be an unrealistic goal. The current task force led by lawmakers Fran Millar from the Senate and Brooks Coleman from the House is the sixth such assemblage to take a stab at fixing school funding.

At one of its first meetings last year, the task force heard from outgoing House Budget Office director John Brown, who said, “We are not going to come up with a formula that reaches for excellence. We are not putting an orchestra in every school. We are going to create a formula so that every school system has enough money to get the basic job done.”

But we don’t actually know what it costs to get the basic job done for the average Georgia student, never mind the student who brings special needs to the equation.

In theory, the state funding formula, which was adopted in 1985, sends enough money to communities so that they can — with a small local tax supplement — provide an adequate basic education to students. In reality, the state formula is outdated, grossly underestimating the cost of textbooks, facilities maintenance and student transportation. It doesn’t address technology needs at all. To attract teachers, virtually all systems augment the state wage.

Historically, the state had paid about 60 to 55 percent percent of real costs of education while local communities paid 40 percent. Today, the state is only footing 38 percent of the education tab in Georgia. (It’s important to note that one percentage point represents well over a hundred million dollars.)

According to Ed Week, other districts have embraced more realistic weighted funding formulas, including Boston:

Under Boston’s system, a low-income English-language learner in 6th grade—student A in this example—would generate fewer funding dollars than a 4th grader with autism, or student B.

But reallocating resources through weighted student funding meant that about 45,000 students were in schools that ended up making smaller cuts or even gaining in funding, despite the overall budget shortfall. Other schools in Boston experienced real decreases in funding or saw their budgets remain the same this school year, based on enrollment and the makeup of their student bodies.

In moving to a “weighted student-funding formula,” Boston joins other districts, such as Baltimore, Denver, Rochester, N.Y., and New York City, that believe this method better serves student needs and creates more transparency and fairness in district finances. And in a time of tight budgets, some also say this funding method creates a process where cuts can be managed around an individual school’s needs, instead of coming by decree from the central office.

“The benefit is you have a single way of allocating resources across the district regardless of the type of school you’re in,” said John McDonough, Boston’s chief financial officer. That leads to a significantly more rational way of responding to budget concerns, he said.

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

198 comments Add your comment

seabeau

July 25th, 2012
5:43 am

My child attended a very small private school. All of her class mates graduated and aprox 76% of her graduating class attended college and most have graduated. All this at a cost of aprox. one tenth the cost to educate a public school student. Get the Federal government out of our schools! PS.,None of the youth were ever incarcerated and none of the girls got pregnant. Go figure!!!

[...] Funding education excellence is a long way off in Georgia and getting farther awayAtlanta Journal Constitution (blog)Ernest sent me a link to this Education Week story about weighted student funding. He asked, “What if funding was differentiated based on need and really allowed for the dollars to follow the students? It seems several school districts are already … [...]

Fed Up

July 25th, 2012
6:35 am

Wouldn’t weighting encourage schools to over-label students just to get the money? We have enough “disorders” out there.

DeborahinAthens

July 25th, 2012
6:45 am

Stop dumbing down the curriculum to the lowest common denominator. Set high standards, keep the standards, teach, stop baby sitting. If a kid doesn’t want to learn, kick them out. At some point this BS has to stop! No one can discipline a child any more. No one can fail a child any more. This is garbage. Reward success, and stop rewarding mediocrity, otherwise we are doomed. Make it cool to be smart and not-cool to be an idiot. Stop this romance with football and basketball. Start a romance with science and math. It can be done. My sister-in-law teaches math in a low income school. She has a robot building club that has 15-20 kids that are JAZZED about the competition with other clubs….it can be done, but we, as a culture have to stop giving awards to the mediocre. In other words, it’s not the money.

Fred in DeKalb

July 25th, 2012
7:12 am

Would this mean that schools located in more affluent areas and those with lower special needs populations would receive less money for operations? Could this be a start of a voucher program? I have a lot of questions about this.

South Georgia Retired Educator

July 25th, 2012
7:17 am

I worked as a public school business official for 24 years and retired in 2002. When I think back on all the state efforts to fund public education and the last one, QBE, in particular, it always came down to the total dollars the legislator and Governor were willing to allocate, regardless of the proven needs of students in all categories throughout the state. QBE has turned out to be a convoluted and failed attempt to send adequate money where student needs have been identified. Rather than looking at the total needs and funding them, based on student counts by category, it has always turned out to be a top-down allocation, with kids always coming up short. In the present environment in Atlanta, this won’t change. When I contact legislators these days about sending adequate money based on the QBE law, they simply don’t reply. It’s very sad.

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:19 am

for someone who yaps so much about the evils of education, Fran doesn’t seem to actually do much to push the ball forward.

South Georgia Retired Educator

July 25th, 2012
7:23 am

A correction to my previous post: Should be “legislature and governor”

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:24 am

I cringe every time someone brings up how they do it up north or out west. one of the major problems we have here is wannabe yankee idiots.

the legislature is the same group of people who hired Steve Portch and actually bought his line quarter to semester conversion could occur and actually save the state money. and why we now have stupid names like State University @ or State College and University

BOB FROM ACCOUNT TEMPS

July 25th, 2012
7:35 am

why does it cost more to educate a poor kid than a rich kid?

Jeff

July 25th, 2012
7:41 am

If funding was the problem, we would be at the top of the heap in international test scoring comparisons.

Show me where all the lottery money has been spent, and where the ORIGINAL education budget has gone (that the lottery was supposed to supplement, not replace) and then we’ll talk about funds for education.

long time educator

July 25th, 2012
7:43 am

Don’t forget to include Title I federal funds that follow the free and reduced students. These are large sums of money awarded to districts and sometimes individual schools because of the number of poor students to create a more level playing field. In most cases, these funds could be used to benefit more classrooms and less as a jobs program for district level supervisors. AJC could look into how these monies are spent; it is public record.

teacher&mom

July 25th, 2012
7:47 am

“Today, the state is only footing 38 percent of the education tab in Georgia.”

Shameful.

That quote deserves to be on broadcasted across the state. A billboard at every major interstate entering GA should have that quote posted for all to see.

We need more honest appraisals like this one. I would love to hear Gov. Deal, Jan Jones, Chip Rogers, Fran Millar, and others take on this article.

Maureen, you have the power to hold their feet to the fire on educational spending. Don’t let them pull away with rhetoric and half truths.

Laurie

July 25th, 2012
7:49 am

We can no longer afford to fund special needs and “English as a 2nd language” students. There is no money left over to address the needs of the young people who will be expected in their adult lives to support the kids who are now getting the lion’s share of our resources.

teacher&mom

July 25th, 2012
7:53 am

@Jeff: Stop with the rhetoric. We’ve not “thrown money” at GA students for over 8 years.

HoneyFern School

July 25th, 2012
7:53 am

Cut the fat. Many times it is less about what we spend than about how we spend it. Hint: we have too many administrators.

teacher&mom

July 25th, 2012
7:57 am

@HoneyFern: That may be true for metro districts, but it isn’t true for many rural districts.

We need to stop viewing education in GA through the “metro Atlanta” lens.

crankee-yankee

July 25th, 2012
8:04 am

bootney farnsworth
July 25th, 2012
7:24 am

“One of the major problems we have here is” an unwillingness, for whatever reason, to look at what is working, or not working in other locales. We all can learn from the mistakes and successes of others but there seems to be a common thread when it comes to political decision-making in this state. From transportation issues to education, if a “yankee” did it, it is not worth studying nor implementing.

NYC moves TEN TIMES the population during rush hours but how they do it, mass transit, road construction that utilizes over/under passes instead of cheaper traffic lights, etc. are not politically savory.

In education, the same thing is happening. Local pundits decry our education system compared to other states’ results (I won’t get into the way the comparisons are being made, that’s another problem) but then refuse to look at what is working in those states.

Do you see a disconnect?

Male Teacher

July 25th, 2012
8:10 am

Laurie………My son is in special ed for a speech delay and your type of thinking(if you want to call it that) is why I’m a former Republican. Chip Rogers and his gang want to trash my son.Chip needs to learn how to manage his own finances and get out of office.

Trim the Middle

July 25th, 2012
8:20 am

Isnt it a fact that the money isnt reaching the classroom most of the time anyway. The bloated warthog that is the Dekalb school system is probably one of the poster children for why the state doesnt want to dole out funds. Too many ppl with way-too high salaries on North Decatur Road.

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
8:27 am

@Fred in DeKalb, 7:12 am

“Could this be a start of a voucher program?”
===============================================================

Thank you for posing this vital, astute question for the public to ponder, Fred.

I would urge the public to ponder that question quite seriously, and to pay very close attention to how this process will unfold in the coming months. Also, I would urge the public to watch closely the positions that Georgia’s Senate and House Education Committees will take, in regard to this undertaking of establishing the cost for an education for each pupil in Georgia.

Be aware that state Sen. Fran Millar (mentioned above) is Chair of the Senate Education Committee and that state Rep. Brooks Coleman (also mentioned above), who was a co-sponsor of HR 1162 – the bill which established Georgia’s amendment to the Constitution being voted on in November which would allow the state to assign charter schools over local jurisdiction – is Chair of the House Education Committee. (State Sen. Chip Rogers, a strong proponent for vouchers in Georgia, sponsored the equivalent of HR 1162 in the Senate.)

===================================================

Also, the public should question, in depth, WHY the following is happening in Georgia:

“Historically, the state had paid about 60 to 55 percent percent of real costs of education while local communities paid 40 percent. Today, the state is only footing 38 percent of the education tab in Georgia. (It’s important to note that one percentage point represents well over a hundred million dollars.)”

Eyes Rolling

July 25th, 2012
8:28 am

Here we go again… the mantra of the Educrats: “SPEND MORE MONEY!”

We already spend more money on education than anybody else in the world. The problem isn’t that we don’t spend enough, the problem is that what we do spend is WASTED by a massive government+government employee union bureaucracy that’s interested in featherbedding for itself as opposed to actually doing what it’s begin paid for.

skipper

July 25th, 2012
8:31 am

Cut the fat! We have “assistants to the assistant”, forced seminars (costly) on everything from diversity (buzzword for lets pay for more feel-good mess) to proper recation to disruptive students. Give the classrooms back to the teachers, get rid of the bad ones and put discipline back into the classroom. Teachers and systems would get sued blind now, but our old coach had a way of giving the occasional “love-tap” and amazingly discipline was restored. If not, get rid of the troublemakers. Look at any school budget, and see all the legal jargon…….

Shirley

July 25th, 2012
8:44 am

We’re funding more and more of education at the local level – and now they’re asking us to vote for “just one cent” so that we can take up the slack from the state on transportation spending? Who thinks that’s where it will end up?

carlosgvv

July 25th, 2012
8:45 am

“excellence costs more than anyone in Georgia is willing to spend”

That’s true. Our politicians would much rather spend our tax dollars on their pet pork projects and improvements to their personal estates.

retired teacher now

July 25th, 2012
8:49 am

seabeau….how many kids in your child’s small private school didn’t speak english, had grandparents raising them because dad disappeared and mom is a drug addict, lived in temporary homes (i.e homeless shelters), had families living below the poverty level, had parents that hung up the phone the minute the teacher announced who she/he was, never showed for parent conferences, had serious discipline problems, couldn’t read, moved 2-3 times every year, came to school just to deal their drugs or because the probation officer said jail or school, had serious handicaps, etc.

I think probably none….use some common sense please. There’s no way around it…kids with these kinds of problem do not get educated on the cheap-cheap. Kids who’s parents do half the work of school are a piece of cake (well comparatively speaking) to educate.

Clarence

July 25th, 2012
8:56 am

As Maureen points out, we already have a weighted formula, and as teacher salaries account for the vast majority of costs associated with education, the formula isn’t as outdated as one might think. In fact, I think if you asked local school districts – in a room of truth – if they’d rather have the current formula fully funded, or have the current group of elected officials rewrite a new formula, they’d say thanks very much, we’ll take our QBE. I’m not sure why the weighted formula is mentioned in the post, as it seems to be just a chance to rehash the 38% story (which is a flawed number as it was taken at the height of federal stimulus).

Mikey D.

July 25th, 2012
9:12 am

Fran Millar has already publicly stated his education funding proposals — Cut teacher pay and raise local millage rates.
So nice to have such bold, innovative “leadership” here in Georgia, huh?

@Jeff- The lottery provided funding for preK, the HOPE scholarship, and certain technology-related expenses. It has NEVER been used to fund any aspect of the k12 budget. Please get your facts straight before posting your next angry rant.

Hiram Abiff

July 25th, 2012
9:31 am

Laurie earth is now a dumber place to live because of that statement…..furthermore teachers are fed up taking the blame for the ills of the profession….politicians are cutting their pay yet raising their responsibilities,yet have minimal input on policy

Once Again

July 25th, 2012
9:33 am

Every study done shows that there is no correllation between funding and educational quality. Washington DC spends more money than any school district in the nation and they have the worst performance. The problems are stuctural, and more money will just mean more failed structure. The govenrment monopoly must end and the socialistic taxpayer funding mechanism must end as well. There will never be any accountability or true service to the customer until the customer is paying and they can take their money and walk when they have been failed by the educational establishment. It is this relationship that makes everything else in the private sector work so well.

Mikey D.

July 25th, 2012
9:36 am

Georgia’s new education mantra, as endorsed by our elected leaders: “We’ll give you the basics, but if you want excellence you’ll have to go elsewhere.”

larry

July 25th, 2012
9:39 am

Maybe if we quit giving our tax money away to corporations for the promise of jobs and put it back into education , we might be able to fully fund QBE instead of less than 38% of it.

Road Scholar

July 25th, 2012
9:40 am

Many points above are good especially the increase in discipline and setting higher acceptable standards. If a kid is a discipline problem, set up boot camps for them to attend. Setting a mean, lean schedule w/o distractions will focus them. Parents would not have a say unless they get involved…if you’re going to be an absentee parent then…. The higher standards need to spell out responsibilities and expectations. The goal of going to college should be non negotiable. Only which college is negotiable. By college, I also include trade and technical schools.

Parent Teacher

July 25th, 2012
9:40 am

Pay for the education when they are young or pay for the incarceration when they are grown. We spend three times as much on prisons as we do on education.

If we are truly to fix the problem we need a birth to 25 policy that educates parents and children. We can’t continue to try and fix students when they begin school after they have spent 5 years with no support. Some of the most developmental years are spent at home before school, 0-5 years old. We can’t ignore the true problems that plague the chronic underperfomers. It is like climbing everast with sandles and a rope in the dead of winter.

For those that don’t truly understand what is happening with the money that is allocated you need to do a little reading and figure it out. The state has cut over 2.2 billion dollars from the budget and local systems can’t make up that kind of difference even by half. The system that I am in has a limited BOE and spends 85% on employee salaries. The other 15% goes to buildings, lights, other bills and to fund the BOE operations. I agree Dekalb and Fulton are wasteful but the rest of the state has been cut to the bone. As for the race to the top funds, out of 400 million dollars the state kept halft and the rest was divide. This money is being spent to implement a new evaluation system and to administer the funds. IT IS NOT BEING SPENT AT THE SCHOOL LEVEL AND DIRECTLY IMPACTING STUDENTS. IT IS CREATING ANOTHER LAYER OF PAPERWORK AND OVER BURDEND TEACHERS AND AMINISTRATORS. If our republican controled house of representatives were true conservative republicans they would have told the feds to keep the money as it is a waste.

Road Scholar

July 25th, 2012
9:42 am

Finally, let the politicians stop giving education lip service. Set up a system for all..no vouchers or state paid escape from public schools. If a person wants a private school, let them pay for it themselves. Correct the problems.

Google "NEA" and "donations"

July 25th, 2012
9:51 am

For the sizable cabal on this blog assigned teacher union talking points to endlessly repeat—taxpayers can never pay enough, and the funding pie can never be lopsided enough in favor of Special Educ and other areas requiring staffing bloat.

And any talk of accountability, innovation, education reform or parental choice can never be reviled or second-guessed enough.

Whirled Peas

July 25th, 2012
10:04 am

It is time for vouchers. Let the people decide which schools to send their kids to. Good schools will thrive and bad schools will wither and fold. Competition would do wonders in cleaning up the mess our politicians have created with the schools in this state. The educrats will fight vouchers tooth and nail because the the last thing they want is to give power to the people.

Fran Millar

July 25th, 2012
10:08 am

Maureen, I suggest you wait until we are done our work before making a judgement. Most superintendents do not have a problem with our basic formula. It needs to be revised to meet current and future needs (like technology) and applied with consistency for budget purposes. I look forward to your evaluation when we are finished.

yuzeyurbrane

July 25th, 2012
10:08 am

Fran Millar is heading the education funding task force! Talk about a wolf in the henhouse. I can already guess his recommendations. Quality public education will not occur in Georgia and Georgia will continue its rapid march to 50th in virtually every category.

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
10:15 am

One of the main purposes of state government is to provide for the education of its citizens. “You get what you pay for” in most areas, and that is certainly true in education. The purpose of education is not profit.

It is my opinion that many of Georgia’s educational policies, as determined in large part through Georgia’s Legislature, are being influenced by national forces, outside of Georgia. However, this situation can change, in the future, through the public’s growing awareness of this and through their voting power.

Please read the link below, in full, to understand part of the reason that I hold the opinion that I do, in this regard. Thank you.

http://alecexposed.org/w/images/5/57/2D4-Next_Generation_Charter_Schools_Act_Exposed.pdf

Old timer

July 25th, 2012
10:15 am

Excellence starts with parents.

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
10:19 am

The link I provided at 10:15 am, above, was lifted from the following link, entitled, “How ALEC is quietly influencing educational reform”:

http://mediamatters.org/print/research/2012/05/09/how-alec-is-quietly-influencing-education-refor/184156

Mikey D.

July 25th, 2012
10:19 am

@Senator Millar:
When will your work be “done”? Do you dispute the reports that the state is now funding only 38% of the education budget? Wouldn’t you agree that this represents a failure at the state level?
I respect that you’re brave enough to come here and post, but how about some real answers to tough questions, rather than simple talking points about how this is all a work in progress. You and your colleagues at the capitol have failed the children of this state for more than a decade. You have demanded accountability from those of us on the front lines of education. How about a little accountability for you and our other legislators?

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
10:20 am

Correction: Link entitled: “How ALEC is quietly influencing educational reform in Georgia.”

crankee-yankee

July 25th, 2012
10:21 am

Once Again
July 25th, 2012
9:33 am

“…private sector works so well.”

Like the recession we are drowning in, right, got it. Worked perfectly! Lehman Bros’, et al greed has pulled us all down. I did not invest with them but am affected by them.

Solutions

July 25th, 2012
10:22 am

You want to spend more on education, I want to spend less, so we have stalemate. Soon I will be exempt from paying the school portion of my property tax, so I suspect my interest in this matter will end. My only observation is this: Public education is more about full employment for school teachers than it is about educating the young. I suggest a 10% across the board pay cut for all school employees in DeKalb county, to balance the budget.

catlady

July 25th, 2012
10:28 am

All I am sure of is that if they go to a weighted formula, the “average kid” weight will be far, far les than it is now. In fact, across the board, the amount allotted to public education by the legislature will be much lower than it is now. It will “magically” be whatever balances the budget–whatever is left over after the sweet deals, special projects, and other such that benefits the powerful.

You see, folks, we’ve been sold a bill of goods. The legislators have picked up on the cry for “local control” and they have continued to sell it and fund it that way. You want local control? they say. Then YOU fund your local schools!

When I started teaching in 1973, we didn’t have computers or even air conditioners. We had a big old room and I was given the responsibility to teach the students, discipline the students, collaborate with the parents, and make it work. Now, I didn’t teach in an affluent area. In fact, I only had one child who had both parents graduate from high school! The average attainment for my children’s parents was 8th grade for dads and 10th grade for moms. All but one child qualified for free lunch. Many of my students had no indoor bathroom, and most had never been outside the county. However, my principal and my superintendent supported my efforts. My students’ parents supported my efforts. My children had ALL been parented. Problems were handled by me and the parents–no adversarial conditions! My pay? $6900!

What was different? Everything.

Maureen Downey

July 25th, 2012
10:49 am

@Sen. Millar, I believe your commission is well intended as were all the others. The question is whether Georgia has the will to fund education to the level necessary to raise its citizens to the attainment level essential to compete. For all the folks who keep saying that money does not matter, explain to me then why the best private schools in Georgia — and the nation — charge $20,000 a year in tuition and that is for students who come with every advantage and few serious learning disabilities.
A reminder to posters who are going to leap up now and say that APS spends $14,000 per pupil — that average includes children with extreme special needs. (Such challenging students would not find spots at many private schools except those specializing in children with disabilities.)
Georgia funding on the straight-ahead kid with no special needs has barely budged and yet we are now asking that those kids reach levels of proficiency never before expected. We can’t do it without some investment in teacher training and quality and curriculum.
Maureen

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
10:50 am

Data from the link I provided at 10:19 am:
———————————————————————————–
Public Non-Charter Students Score Higher Than Charter Students On Average. From average scale scores compiled by the National Center for Education Statistics:

2009 public school national average scale scores

Charter

Non-charter
———————————————————————

Mathematics, grade 4

231 (Charter)

239 (Non-charter)
———————————————————————

Reading, grade 8 (Error, I believe; this should have been typed “grade 4.”)

212 (Charter)

220 (Non-charter)
———————————————————————————-

Mathematics, grade 8

275 (Charter)

282 (Non-charter)
———————————————————————–

Reading, grade 8

257 (Charter)

262 (Non-charter)

[National Center for Education Statistics, accessed 10/25/11; screenshots of data here]

—————————————————————————–

Jane W.

July 25th, 2012
10:52 am

@Fran Millar:

With all due respect, when it comes to traditional public schools our Maureen has never met an anti-reform argument she didn’t like. At least not in memory.

And her newspaper isn’t coy about its Democrat Party alliance.

So why further distract yourself from finding solutions to Georgia’s education problems? Look to nearby Louisiana for innovations—and the public-spirited resolve to carry them out.

Fran Millar

July 25th, 2012
10:52 am

MikeyD, the Finance Commission work will be done in 2013. When I said in the AJC to raise millage rates I was referring to those districts with low rates (not DeKalb). 90% of money the state sends is for payroll and benefits. I am looking into the 38% number because that has never been shown before. Could be stimulus $ (gone) and Race to the Top (will be gone). Finally we are giving young people more options through my BRIDGE bill and HB186. Not everyone needs to go to a 4 year college. Our goal is to have productive citizens.

Maureen Downey

July 25th, 2012
10:59 am

@Jane, You keep ignoring my question, which is where is the evidence that choice — which seems to be your sole reform– is a game changer?

Nowhere in the country have vouchers or charters been proven to dramatically improve education outcomes for poor kids. Voucher supporters were stunned in 2008 when movement guru Sol Stern — author of “Breaking Free: Public School Lessons and the Imperative of School Choice” — expressed doubts about the effectiveness of market incentives and choice in reforming education.

A longtime chronicler of the landmark voucher program in Milwaukee, Stern decreed that the compelling model was no longer Milwaukee, where school quality still lagged, but Massachusetts, where academic achievement soared

“The improvement had nothing to do with market incentives, ” Stern wrote. “Massachusetts has no vouchers, no tuition tax credits, very few charter schools, and no market incentives for principals and teachers.”

What Massachusetts does have, Stern said, is visionary education leaders, a rigorous curriculum, demanding tests linked to the curriculum standards and a comprehensive high school exit exam.

Why do you keep looking to Milwaukee when we should be studying Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut and North Carolina. Those states lead the nation in educational gains, and they’re doing so without razing the public school system in favor of vouchers. They are investing in preschool and teacher quality, raising rigor and adopting and sticking to whole school reform plans.

Let’s follow suit and see what happens before we dismantle our public schools in favor of the voucher pipe dream.

Show me your evidence and spare me the empty rhetoric.

catlady

July 25th, 2012
11:01 am

Well said, Ms. Downey!

DeKalb Inside Out

July 25th, 2012
11:02 am

@crankee-yankee:
When big private companies fail, the economy feels the pain.

If Lehman were a public entity, your cry would be “It’s failing. We need to give it MORE money.”

Bad private companies fail and go away. I’ve never heard of a bad public entity failing. They just seem to get more money. The worse a public entity does, the more money it gets.

Once Again

July 25th, 2012
11:02 am

All that needs to be said about how we get out of this hole:

http://www.mises.org/daily/2937/What-If-Public-Schools-Were-Abolished

Once Again

July 25th, 2012
11:05 am

And Cranky Yankee – If you don’t understand the role the Federal Reserve, government banking and financial regulations, and dozens of other direct government actions played in the current economic crisis, then please get educated before you attempt to comment. We do not have a free market in anything anymore in this country. The entire financial system is controlled by the government on behalf of businesses and the banking cartel. If you think that has anything to do with a truly free maket then again, please get educated. http://www.mises.org is a great place to start.

Solutions

July 25th, 2012
11:17 am

Why all the focus on poor kids? High IQ poor kids do just fine in most any school, the lower IQ poor kids fail at most any school. We need to stop pretending that IQ does not matter, or that IQ is a real measure of educational potential. Stop throwing my tax dollars at your social agenda, it is a failed agenda with no hope of recovery. The poor are poor and stay poor because they are not very bright, they have low IQs. Education does not increase IQ, so stop pretending it does. Success should be praised and rewarded, but today failure is used as a justification to seek more public tax dollars for the same old crowd to do the same old things, hoping for a different outcome. I urge a 10% across the board pay cut for all DeKalb school employees, and that includes the fat cats at the top.

living in an outdated ed system

July 25th, 2012
11:27 am

I really don’t know how many times I have to repeat this. FUNDING IS NOT THE PROBLEM. When all of you realize that spending has been wasted on a system that has not been reformed in more than a century, then perhaps Georgia will become a leader, not a laggard, in reforming its education system.

I know that the funding formula is going to be revisited in the next legislative session. But at the same time, we need to fix the myriad of problems, which includes bloated district budgets (especially central office), better teacher training, more effective teacher evaluation systems, and a focus on digital learning.

There’s a reason why Tennessee placed second in the RTTT grants. It is taking the courageous steps to try and fix the problems. Instead of complaining on this blog and hiding behind the stances of self-interest groups such as the teacher unions, how about having the courage to truly reform how we educate our kids? As a taxpayer, I for one do not want to see more wasted spending like what is going on in APS and Dekalb.

Shameful – and embarrassing. It just reinforces what is in the Georgia Constitution, which is to only provide an “adequate” education. We’re not even doing that.

williebkind

July 25th, 2012
11:29 am

Make school voluntary!

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
11:31 am

Not exactly on topic, but definitely related – three models that changed the one-teacher/one classroom model and actually could raise teacher salaries and cut costs (yeah, yeah, I know – I didn’t believe it either – read the article!): http://opportunityculture.org/reach/pay-teachers-more/

Another option I found intriguing was basing funding on outcome – how many graduates a system produced as opposed to “butts in seats” – how many students a system had. I believe a system in Oregon was looking at this funding model.

For all the talk about reform, it seems like all measures always come down to teachers, when in reality there are lots of areas for reform, funding being a key one. The mishmash of money sources is truly insane, and something I had no idea about as a parent. It’s not just fed/state/district – it’s also grants and PTA. Federal money isn’t one pot – it’s SPED/ESOL/Title I, II, III. State money doesn’t come from just income taxes and district money doesn’t just come from property taxes. It’s easy to sit on the outside and offer soundbite solutions, but the problem is extraordinarily complex.

For the record, I believe the other areas of reform, in addition to the funding model, include our academic-year/calendar-age based groupings of k12, teacher training, and school structure…and no, I’m not a member of the GAE/NEA – just like 65% – the majority – of Georgia teachers.

skipper

July 25th, 2012
11:32 am

Massachussets does not have our demographics……like it or not. Review testing results, and realize that (whether you cuss, scream, or yell racism) that we have a little different situation here………..

Dunwoody Mom

July 25th, 2012
11:36 am

At one of its first meetings last year, the task force heard from outgoing House Budget Office director John Brown, who said, “We are not going to come up with a formula that reaches for excellence. We are not putting an orchestra in every school. We are going to create a formula so that every school system has enough money to get the basic job done.”

Let me remind Mr. Brown of what the State of Georgia constitution says about education:

The provision of an adequate public education for the citizens shall be a primary obligation of the State of Georgia

This leads me to believe that Mr. Brown believes that “adequate education” equates to “just enough money to get the basic job done”.

Further proof of the lack of committment of this generation of politicians has for public education in our state.

Holly Jones

July 25th, 2012
11:43 am

Here is what continues to amaze me: Several posters (myself among them under my former screen name “former teacher”) have made the same, basic, common-sense suggestions about how to get the educational train back on track- i.e. improve discipline, stop over testing, stop with the “reform du jour”, let teachers teach. And apparently, Sen. MIllar, who holds substantial power to affect these changes, reads these posts, or at least this string. So, why are the basic suggestions not even being considered, much less implemented by our leaders under the Gold Dome? Why are the teachers who have to implement these “reforms” and mandates never consulted about how they will play out in the real world? And why is ANYONE surprised when the reforms and mandates don’t result in a utopia in our schools? It is not rocket science, folks. Ask the people who do the job (teachers) first. THEY are the experts- not “educational researchers” who haven’t taught in a K-12 classroom is years.

Lee

July 25th, 2012
11:46 am

@Maureen, re “Show me your evidence and spare me the empty rhetoric.”

Indeed. And what was the black/white “achievement gap” in those four states you mentions when normalized for socioeconomic status? Riiggghhhhttt

Which leads me back to @Solutions post above, it really is about IQ. The bottom line is that you cannot teach the student with an IQ of 80 in the same manner and pace that you can a student with an IQ of 120. But yet, that is what the current education structure tries to do.

The most cost effective and sensible solution would be to segregate students by ability/achievement and provide instruction at a pace and level commensurate with that ability/achievement level. But, the politically correct educrats know if they did, students would soon become segregated by race, and Lord knows we can’t have that. We can’t touch the third rail of a politically correct society by providing evidence that there really is a difference between the races.

And so we producers will continue to overfund the current, bloated education system while politicians try to find ways to divert more money to the money pit.

Mom of 3

July 25th, 2012
11:48 am

Thank you, Old timer. Excellence does start with the parents. That is why even if the amount spent per student doubled, it would not matter for the majority of kids. Sure, a handful of motivated kids that have apathetic parents will excel, but that is about it.

Also, in my experience, if kids aren’t readers, they will not be successful in school. And guess what? Reading begins in the home. Parents need to tell their children to put down the iphones, get off of Facebook, and pick up a book. I have a high schooler, a middle schooler, and one in elementary school. My older two love reading and they excel at their studies. My younger one would rather be outside, but knowing how important reading is to all subjects I make sure he reads everyday. Oh, and he doesn’t have a cell phone like so many other 10 year olds. And none of my children have Facebook.
It is not about money. It is about family priorities. Sadly, for many families education is not a priority.
Schools and teachers are expected to do the impossible. Excellence will not be achieved until more is demanded of the parents.

pleasebeserious

July 25th, 2012
11:49 am

Mary Elizabeth,

We all know how you despise Charter Schools. There is no need to continue with your rants.

DeKalb Teacher

July 25th, 2012
11:49 am

@CCMST:
It’s hard to get out of the mindset of perverse monetary incentives. DC tried to institute bonuses for performance for teachers to no avail.

Pay good schools more and bad schools less. How about this … Instead of paying teachers for good performance, why don’t we just pay the students?

Jane W.

July 25th, 2012
11:55 am

@ Maureen:

If the Milwaukee tuition voucher program isn’t delivering for parents—then why is it over-subscribed year after year? And why hasn’t decades of labor union effort to limit parental choice failed to end the program or the public’s interest in it?

Wisconsin’s Gov. Scott Walker, perhaps the most visible proponent of the voucher system you seek here to discredit, just won a resounding election victory in the May recall election.

Are Wisconsin’s parents and voters stupid? … or do they see that your side offers no answers—only endless debate, ever more spending, and continued failure to move the ball.

Solutions

July 25th, 2012
11:57 am

I agree with Lee!

Dunwoody Mom

July 25th, 2012
11:58 am

@Jane – I get a big kick out of these people that point to a “resounding” victory in a recall election. That there were enough votes to even have a recall election is indictment enough against Walker and his tactics.

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
11:59 am

@Dekalb Teacher – I believe Dr. Roland Fryar from Harvard tried paying students to mixed results – the student I’m thinking of tried several different incentives to varying degrees of success. I’ll try to find a link. I would be for using some funding to pay students if it worked – why not? That makes a teacher’s job easier. It’s always easier to work with the motivated ones, in my experience.

Ole Guy

July 25th, 2012
12:00 pm

Every time I see the word “excellence” bolted, as a descriptive, onto another word, it can be automatically noted that said discriptive is (in the raw, unpleasant as it may seem) BS! At this particularly sorry state of educational affairs, howbout we stop worrying about achieving anything remotely resembling excellence and simply go back to those basics…you know, like how to reed, rat, and do a lil’ rithmitic. We’ve fooled ourselves for far far too long; the sooner we start realizing that, the better off these stupid kids will be; the better they just might be able to fund my Social Sec…you know, like ALL the generations have been able to do. I believe that, along with a multitude of other things, is what is referred to as the civic duties of youth…GET A GD EDUCATION, STOP POINTING FINGERS, AND START PRODUCING. You can only blame the rest of the world for so long before that mean ole reality strikes…COMPRENDE!?

Jefferson

July 25th, 2012
12:09 pm

Equal funding for all students.
No local property taxes for education.
State & Feds fund education from income,corporate taxes.

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
12:13 pm

Oops, spelled his name wrong – Roland Fryer: http://hvrd.me/M8Cj4V Financial Incentives and Student Achievement

In summary, the gist of what he found was that the incentive needed to be tied to something the students could control such as number of books read or attendance. It did not work well for things largely out of the students’ control such as grades or standardized test scores.

Daniel Pink also has some interesting thoughts on incentivizing tasks and how that can actually work against motivation…but if planned smartly and effectively, I think this kind of investment would be a good one.

Jane W.

July 25th, 2012
12:23 pm

@”Dunwoody Mom”: Wisconsin state Democrat leaders got a decidedly different sort of “kick” out of the Walker recall vote results: one squarely in the seat of their union-made britches!

living in an outdated ed system

July 25th, 2012
12:27 pm

@CCMSt – Roland Fryer’s work is VERY controversial. I do NOT support bribing students for achievement. However, I have no problems with creating other reward systems and other mechanisms to motivate students.

living in an outdated ed system

July 25th, 2012
12:27 pm

@Maureen – you missed a VERY important state in your diatribe. Tennessee!

Dunwoody Mom

July 25th, 2012
12:28 pm

@Jane….still gotta have A LOT of voters sign a recall petition to have a recall election…….It was an extraordinary event.

C Taylor

July 25th, 2012
12:30 pm

We can discuss funding all day long and it will not matter. The goal is to end public education and allow billions to be made by privatizing a state function. My county has cut the calendar 5 days (from 180 to 175) and added two extra furlough days. It amazes me how the Republican party has successfully demonized public workers.

Jane W.

July 25th, 2012
12:32 pm

But somehow those petition signers turned out NOT to be actual Wisconsin voters, eh Ron?

I love teaching. I hate what it is becoming...

July 25th, 2012
12:34 pm

@Jane W. “Wisconsin’s Gov. Scott Walker, perhaps the most visible proponent of the voucher system you seek here to discredit, just won a resounding election victory in the May recall election. ”

Let’s be honest here. A large percentage of that “resounding victory” was folks who can’t stand Walker or his policies, but voted against a recall because they believe in the system, and did not feel it was right to overthrow a legitimately elected official.

Rather like, a large percentage of the folks against the Affordable Care Act were not against it because they dislike the idea of it (as it suggested by the conservative right) but because they did not feel it went far enough – they would have preferred a single pay system.

Stats and polls are a broad measure and do not allow for nuances – complex issues required a more refined interpretation.

It seems like everyday there is an article in the educational news about how some Charter school or Charter system has been found guilty of fraud and misappropriation of funds – and yet people still push them as the solution to all difficulties facing public schools. Not all public schools are failing. Not all charter schools are perfect. No one solution is going to solve all our problems. It will take a joint effort and a multiple targeted approach. In other words, there are no easy solutions or one size fits all answers.

Booze Hound

July 25th, 2012
12:34 pm

More funding? We already spend far too much trying to “educate” dummies. Most Americans aren’t really capable of much outside of banal manual labor and tee-vee watching, anyway. Georgia can lead the way by putting its boobs and sub-mediocrities to work now rather than afflicting the taxpayers further!

I love teaching. I hate what it is becoming...

July 25th, 2012
12:42 pm

@Jane W “But somehow those petition signers turned out NOT to be actual Wisconsin voters, eh Ron?”

There is an old anacronym that has been around of the internet for a while PPOR… it means, “Post Proof or Retract.” So I await your proof that the signers of the petition were NOT Wisconsin voters… noting that you did not say, “some” or “a percentage” but “those petition signers” suggesting ALL OF THEM.

living in an outdated ed system

July 25th, 2012
12:44 pm

People on this blog have blinders on! The system is broken and needs to be fixed. More funding won’t solve Georgia’s education woes!

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
12:51 pm

@I love teaching…”In other words, there are no easy solutions or one size fits all answers.”

#truth

Digger

July 25th, 2012
12:53 pm

Trying to get a bunch of people with low IQs to really understand how critical IQ is – now that’s a tough assignment.

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
12:59 pm

@pleasebeserious, 11:49 am

“Mary Elizabeth,
We all know how you despise Charter Schools. There is no need to continue with your rants.”
===============================================

You have forfeited your own credibility, with educated people, with your above statement. Your statement contains two “loaded” words (”despise” and “rants”) which are both inflammatory and falsehoods regarding my positions and writings. Furthermore, you are deliberately, and maliciously, attempting to perpetuate these falsehoods.

I will refute your vituperative remarks by giving numbered facts, below, which will bring “light” instead of “heat” to the truth of my thoughts regarding charter schools.

(1) Please read my thoughts, below, which I had posted on this blog on July 23, 2012, in which I had written, in part, that “I have nothing against charter schools.”
——————————————————————————————

Mary Elizabeth, 11:51 am, July 23, 2012:

“Magnet schools, within public school systems, have been around for at least a quarter of a century. This type of ‘pick and choose’ by students’ needs must have overall planning and cohesion and that is why decisions regarding these schools, and how many of them the system can accommodate, is better left to public school systems. I have nothing against public charter schools, but I believe that – for prudence in finances as well as cohesion in programs, public charter schools need to be approved (especially in number) and guided under the jurisdiction of local school districts.

The public must, also, be wary of new and innovative programs that could inadvertently (or not so inadventently) have the end result of turning public schools, essentially, into private ones. We must work to improve the public schools we have; we must not dismantle them, even unintentionally. Doing so, would change the nature of ‘free’ public education, which is now avaiable for every student in the nation.”

(2) Posting data, regarding the variant results for charter and non-charter schools in reading and mathematics, as well as posting information about ALEC, do not amount to “rants.”

(3) I have posted on my own blog an essay regarding public charter schools. Below is an excerpt from that essay. See the link below for my full analysis of the charter school movement in Georgia.

“Public charter schools are one possiblility that may help to improve traditional public schools, but not all charter schools will automatically do that. Some charter schools are inferior to public schools as test results have shown. Nevertheless, if public charter schools are carefully assigned and limited in number, and if they are encouraged to work in harmony with traditional public schools, this latest educational endeavor could become an opportunity that could benefit both public charter schools and traditional public schools. The key is working together, and not working in competition with one another. Moreover, that is a better model for students to observe and to emulate.”

http://maryelizabethsings.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/about-education-essay-6-on-georgias-charter-school-movement/

Barry

July 25th, 2012
1:15 pm

I just think it’s adorable how, in every discussion involving education, self-proclaimed experts come out of the woodwork to proclaim that all the ills of the public education system would be fixed if only their simplistic ideas were put in place.

Face it, folks. Georgia politicians do not value public education because the school systems can’t kick back fat donations to them. They want private, for-profit companies to gain a greater foothold through charter schools, so state funding can funnel through private pockets and back to theirs. They don’t mind spending money on the public school system; they just hate it that they can’t get a greater piece of the action.

They don’t have a profit motive for fixing public schools, so they want to give themselves one. They got halfway there with the scheme that allows tax-deductible corporate donations to private schools. Charter schools with no local accountability will really rev up their gravy train, forever damning the public school system to the back seat of mediocrity.

Don’t say you weren’t warned.

DeKalb Teacher

July 25th, 2012
1:21 pm

@CCMST
Freakonomics had mixed results as well. Perhaps paying the kids to get over the same bar is not answer. California is looking into measuring kids annually and paying teachers by the progress the kids make and not how many are above some arbitrary bar.

If we paid students in the same way, then of all levels of students would have achievable goals.

This convo is an academic exercise anyway. Most people are OK with bonusing teachers for performance but are strangely appalled at paying the students.

NONPC

July 25th, 2012
1:24 pm

I could cite study after study that shows no correlation between spending and student outcomes (within reason). One cannot achieve education excellence through funding. If it were possible, Georgia would ALREADY have world class schools. The U.S…. AND GEORGIA… already spend more on education than just about everywhere else in the world. Anyone purporting this, including MD, loses credibility.

As far as the “state” vs “local” vs “federal” funding go, the point is moot. ALL FUNDING COMES FROM THE SAME POOL OF TAXPAYERS, either through property, sales or income taxes. If we are going to get in a p*ssing contest about how much say someone should have in education, the TAXPAYERS who pay all three of these taxes should have the MOST say.

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
1:28 pm

@Dekalb Teacher – “Most people are OK with bonusing teachers for performance but are strangely appalled at paying the students.” – LOL, not me, if it works! To a certain extent, I’m motivated by money – why wouldn’t others be, no matter what the age?

Fryer is one of the economists whose research the Freakonomics people use. There is other research out there, too – some is mentioned by Fryer in his paper.

There are so many options out there for reform, it just chaps my hide that it seems like it’s always focused on the teachers – we are not the only factor in this equation.

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
1:31 pm

@Dekalb Teacher – just an additional thought I had – as someone occasionally motivated by money, I balk at the idea of bonuses based on the students’ test scores – why? Because it’s largely something out of my control. How funny that the Fryer study basically found the incentives worked LEAST successfully for elements out of the students’ control…like test scores.

Almost the flip side of what you said about paying teachers vs paying students. Incroyable.

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
1:34 pm

OK, @NONPC, cite some – please. I would like to read them. Thanks. It’s not a specific area in which I have seen much research.

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
1:35 pm

Corrrection: ” . . . in which I had written, in part, that ‘I have nothing against public charter schools. . .’ “

Long Time Teacher

July 25th, 2012
1:47 pm

I have thought about vouchers even though I work in the public schools. Would they help the average child? We would have to consider how much the voucher would be worth. If we gave every child in Georgia a voucher….how much would we give them. $500, $1000…or maybe $3000…Then if they went to a private school how would they pay the other $10,000 to $15,000 for tuition. I know few families who could afford the rest of the tuition. So I conclude that vouchers are for the rich like the north bound lane of route 85. The public schools have given the opportunity for all children to learn. If it were not for the public schools there would be grave povery in this country. We cloth, feed, nurse, comfort, give supplies, and ….oh yes…we also educate every child no matter what their economic or social standing. I am proud to have been a teacher and have had the privilege of helping all who have come to my classroom.

crankee-yankee

July 25th, 2012
1:51 pm

DeKalb Inside Out
July 25th, 2012
11:02 am

“When big private companies fail, the economy feels the pain.”

I guess they are too big then.

“The worse a public entity does, the more money it gets.”

Using that logic, I guess GA must be an educational leader at this point after $5.3 Billion in cuts over the past 10 years.

“If Lehman were a public entity, your cry would be “It’s failing. We need to give it MORE money.”” – Glad to know you are blessed with psychic abilities that you can place words in my mouth.

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
1:54 pm

@NONPC – some further thoughts on your post:

“The U.S…. AND GEORGIA… already spend more on education than just about everywhere else in the world.” This is a tricky bit to comparatively quantify. First, a large part of our funding goes to salaries – reasonable salaries are tied to a countries cost of living. So it’s a little tricky to compare a US teacher’s salary with a teacher from a country like Chile, for example. Also, part of US teacher’s salary is healthcare…I’m sure you know where I am going with that.

We also teach students that other countries don’t – there are provisions of IDEA (some upheld by the Supreme Court) that require some for of schooling or assistance from birth to 21 for some individuals with disabilities. When you look at “average per student costs” you are not looking at the money spent on each individual child.

Our school buildings are palaces compared to some other countries schools – not to mention the maintenance and utility costs. some countries have their students clean rather than janitors…that doesn’t fly here, lol. We’re not even allowed to have students wipe the table down after lunch in case some one is allergic to the cleaner (true story).

I could go on, but you get what I’m saying: at face value, you might be right, but it’s a kiwi to kumquats comparison.

You also said, “ALL FUNDING COMES FROM THE SAME POOL OF TAXPAYERS, either through property, sales or income taxes.” Mmmm, I’m going to play devil’s advocate and say, maybe, but not all are paying the same amount – and definitely not the same amount in each category. I might also argue that it’s not the same pool – someone not of my district passing through my county on a road trip who stops and makes a purchase will donate to our SPLOST funds – but shouldn’t have a say in how those funds are spent, IMHO. Someone who works in one county and lives in another poses another issue – particular if it’s in a bordering state (I grew up in MA and NH – one has an income tax, and the other does not – made life interesting for those who crossed borders to work or live – FL has no income tax, and we share a border withe them – just saying).

Again, not saying you’re wrong, but that the issue is actually much more complex once you think about it.

another comment

July 25th, 2012
1:55 pm

@teacher dad; you should do what I did, get a prescription from your peditrician and take your child to Children’s Healthcare for Speech Therapy. If your child has a speech delay, it is yours and every parent’s responsibility to get that child the medical treatment they need. If you are a teacher in a public school system, your health insurance cover’s Speech Therapy through a registerd Speech Therapist with a doctors prescription. Sure you might have a co-pay, but that is how parenthood is.

My daughter was 6 and at Catholic School when they had the Atlanta Speech School come in and evaluate all of the students. What were my choices take her and enroll her at the Speech School about 16K then over 20K now. Get the doctor to write a presciption for Speech Therapy, take her to Children’s Healthcare for their Speech therapy clinic, for several months. Or try to get the public School District to pay for it. I was living in Cobb County and was told that Cobb County would not give her any priority until she was 8. I was also told by Professionals that 8 would be too old to really address the problem. Now if I lived in Fulton County it would be a different story, they would cover this at 6. Sure enough one of the other parent’s at the Catholic School whose child had the same diagnose, took her child to Fulton County Schools for Speech Therapy once a week for free. The real kicker is her husband makes over $200K a year. The Fortune 100 company he works for their insurance would have paid for the speech therapy too, but she didn’t want to pay the $40 or so co-pay, since she lived in Fulton and could just take her daughter to Heards Ferry for an hour once a week.

This is another reason we need Healthcare coverage for all. Healthcare coverage does pay for Speech Therapy. It should not be the school’s responsibility, but the parents. The parent’s should pay for it through their insurance and co-payment.

crankee-yankee

July 25th, 2012
1:59 pm

Once Again
July 25th, 2012
11:05 am

“The entire financial system is controlled by the government on behalf of businesses and the banking cartel.”

Actually, when congress killed off the Glass-Steagal Act & its restrictions, that is what opened the doors to the the predators on Wall St. and the subsequent mess we are in.

SmartK12Funding

July 25th, 2012
1:59 pm

In addition to the Commission, the Smarter Funding, Better Outcomes initiative is focusing on just this – how Georgia funds via QBE. We will:

Create a roadmap for K-12 finance reform that includes in-depth research on Georgia’s current education funding formula and how it might be improved to better meet our students’ needs.

Evaluate how key characteristics of high-quality funding systems – such as efficiency, flexibility, innovation and transparency – could transform Georgia’s current funding strategy, making it easier to track how dollars impact students and outcomes.

Encourage the education community, business leaders, parents, elected officials – everyone with an interest in Georgia students – to join the discussion and support smarter funding strategies that will lead to better outcomes for students and a brighter future for all Georgians.

If you are interested in the funding aspect of ed reform, I encourage you to explore our QBE in action interactive graphic, and get involved in the conversation for change @ http://www.smartk12funding.com.

Mikey D.

July 25th, 2012
2:06 pm

@Jane W
You are still ignoring Maureen’s question… Where is your evidence that vouchers affect more positive outcomes for disadvantaged students than traditional public schools? Do you have any data to back up your claims? Any study results? Please post links…

Jane W.

July 25th, 2012
2:39 pm

Sorry Ron, but I have a 12-month rather than a 9-month job and couldn’t get immediately back to you.

Indeed, it was ruled that “Mickey Mouse” and “Adolf Hitler” (two actual signatures turning up multiple times on those recall petitions you cite) had to be accepted as “possible” Wisconsin residents.

That aside, to the rest of us it was telling that a pulp mountain of petition paper and much loud hoopla by unions—ended in a whimper. Gov. Scott Walker increased his victory margin by 50 percent over that in the 2010 election.

ref: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70429.html

And to add insult to injury—now that union membership is no longer mandatory teachers are apparently opting out of the local National Education Association affiliate in droves.

ref: http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/127806733.html

Ron F.

July 25th, 2012
2:40 pm

@Jane W: “But somehow those petition signers turned out NOT to be actual Wisconsin voters, eh Ron?”

I respectfully, politely, calmly ask that you not add my name to a post addressed to another person on this blog. I have not posted on this thread and likely will not as I’m back at school early, for no pay whatsoever, trying to get ready for the coming school year. I have addressed you as respectfully as possible, and have always tried to carefully choose words in my few debates with you so as not to encourage your rancor. Please give the same respect in return.

MiltonMan

July 25th, 2012
3:10 pm

Libs answer to everything: just spend (aka Throw) money at the problem & it some point it will go away.

APS spends 12k on students; North Fulton less than half that.

North Fulton schools >>>>>>>> APS schools

Google "NEA" and "donations"

July 25th, 2012
3:10 pm

@ Fran Millar:

Please excuse our host Maureen for her disingenuous suggestion that reform might imperil(!) the existing traditional public school structure. That’s obviously a red herring—and anyway laughable to inner-city parents who’d be ONLY TOO HAPPY to see failing education bureaucracies sink into oblivion.

I wouldn’t weep if the Atlanta City, Fulton and Dekalb school boards decamped to Kazakhstan. Would you?

As for Maureen continually citing tuition figures for the most elite of private schools—rather than those of Catholic schools nationwide getting the job done for far less than taxpayers now spend per student in comparable public schools …

yuzeyurbrane

July 25th, 2012
3:13 pm

Fran Millar, your last post states not everyone should be educated to go to college. No one would disagree but the devil is in the details. Don’t you think that a meritocracy requires that everyone be educated to their maximum ability regardless of their origins? Or do you believe in some sort of Social Darwinism where only the children of the wealthy (the fittest) get that opportunity? What is your alternative to improving the public schools? Support your position with facts, not ideological rhetoric. Do you think children of the wealthy who do not perform well in their private schools should be denied entry to colleges and universities? Or is money always an exception? Why?

Prof

July 25th, 2012
3:18 pm

@ Jane W. You say above that you have a 12-month job, yet just today alone you’ve posted 5 times during work-hours: 10:52 am, 11:55 am, 12:23 pm, 12:32 pm, and 2:30 pm. Tsk, tsk.

red herring

July 25th, 2012
3:26 pm

Enter your comments here

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
3:26 pm

Well, @prof – a recent survey done by Salary.com showed Americans admitted to wasting an average of 2 hours of their employers time per day. http://www.libgig.com/node/1011 Jane W. is just doing her part.

And, naysayers, the “lib” in the URL does not stand for “liberal” – it’s for “library.”

Fran Millar

July 25th, 2012
3:30 pm

Yuzeyurbrane, why don’t you read HB400(Bridge bill) and HB186 to see what options we are giving young people. It has nothing to do with wealth. It is college and/or career ready. Sounds like you have a class warfare problem based on your comments. These bills (now law) are fact not ideological rhetoric.

red herring

July 25th, 2012
3:34 pm

re: previous post/computer glitch. it’s time to realize that education can not continue to consume more and more of the state budget. education administrations have become too large and certainly too expensive. reduce the size of administration and it’s costs and you may be able to return sanity to the cost of education. we have rebuilt vast numbers of schools over the past 10 years with splost money but it’s never enough. renovating old schools is a thing of the past—we must buy more land and build new buildings. go back to the recommendations made by group hired to cut spending by dekalb (not that they followed them—it was just a means to say “we tried our best”) —when that group stated what needed to be cut and where –it was never seriously considered. too much fat in the education system—cut half the fat and even then there will be more than needed—our schools should be looking at ways to better educate not ways to spend more and ask for more. same old song and dance every year–we need more, more,more… many taxpayers have lost sympathy.

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
3:41 pm

Please note that the website given by SmartKFunding, at 1:59 pm is led by Georgia’s Chamber of Commerce. See the words, below, from that website, stated under “More” within “Initiatives”:

“The Smarter Funding, Better Outcomes initiative is led by the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, the state’s largest business advocacy organization, which represents a diverse range of industries on key policy issues at the state and federal level to ensure Georgia remains economically competitive. . .

The Chamber is committed to improving educational outcomes for Georgia students in order to provide employers with the qualified workforce they need now and in the future. . .

Funding for Smarter Funding, Better Outcomes is provided through a grant by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to the Georgia Chamber Foundation, a 501(c)(3) affiliate of the Chamber that works to educate key stakeholders and the public on policies consistent with the Chamber’s guiding mission.”

===============================================

Readers should, also, be aware that Georgia’s Chamber of Commerce supported HR 1162 in the last legislative session, which provided the amendment to Georgia’s Constitution to be voted on in November, which will give the state of Georgia the right to establish public charter schools beyond the jurisdiction of local school districts. See the link below:

http://www.gachamber.com/supportshr1162/

=========================================

And, from that link, given immediately above, please read the following excerpt, below, in which ALEC is mentioned:

“The Chamber has designated HR 1162 as a scorecard issue for 2012.

Inadequate Education System is Harming Georgia’s Economy

Georgia ranks near the bottom of the nation in standardized test scores and high school graduation rates, and far below the national average in college completion and other measures. . .

Georgia spends a total of $11,498 per student per year – more than the national average – to achieve these subpar results, according to the American Legislative Exchange Council. That’s a poor return on investment. [NOTE: ALEC is the American Legislative Exchange Council. Also, note that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is a member of ALEC.]

Charter Schools Provide Georgia Students with Quality Options

Charter schools are public schools that typically produce better results for students – and for less funding than traditional public schools. . .”
=============================================

The website provided by SmartKFunding at 1:59 pm appears to be a site with a political agenda for a certain type of educational reform, to me. Why not reform traditional public education, from within? That is my question. However, traditional public education cannot make substantive reform from within, if funds to traditional public education are cut by state legislators. Think about it.

Maureen Downey

July 25th, 2012
3:43 pm

@Google, As a Catholic school graduate, I like Catholic schools. However, I don’t think they work miracles. The research on private schools suggest that students in Catholic schools, particularly those run by Jesuits, outperform other private schools even while controlling for SES.
And Catholic high schools are cheaper, $8,182 per year on average nationwide. (Note that tuition on the premier Catholic high schools, such as Marist in Atlanta, is often double that amount. Marist School lists its tuition this year as $16,300. http://www.marist.com/admissions/tuition)
Enrollment remains primarily white, 74.2 percent. However, these schools serve mostly Catholics; only 15.4 percent of the 312,732 students in Catholic schools are not Catholics. I think the homogeneity of the student population and the shared religious values play a role.
http://www.ncea.org/news/annualdatareport.asp#tuition
Maureen

I love teaching. I hate what it is becoming...

July 25th, 2012
3:51 pm

@Jane W “Indeed, it was ruled that “Mickey Mouse” and “Adolf Hitler” (two actual signatures turning up multiple times on those recall petitions you cite) had to be accepted as “possible” Wisconsin residents.”

First of all, I am not Ron. So please address me by my screen name when you are responding to a question I sent. Secondly, you suggest that NONE of the signatures on the recall petition were legit, and then can only come up with TWO… let me repeat that…TWO illegitimate signatures out nearly 1 million?

I would hardly call that “proof” of anything.

@CCMST “a recent survey done by Salary.com showed Americans admitted to wasting an average of 2 hours of their employers time per day.”

I thought about that the other day when I was traveling with someone who was on vacation who kept playing word games with their office mates (who were not on vacation). They sent updates ALL DAY LONG, and it did not matter when they were sent, replies came back within minutes. So just how hard were those office mates working at those private sector jobs?

But it is we teachers who get accused of being lazy. Know how much time I ‘waste’ when I am working? NOT A MINUTE. In fact, I end up giving my employer about two hours of MY time (unpaid) every day.

I understand the temptation of folks to try and simply the issues facing public education, but the fact is, the problems are COMPLEX – so no easy solution is going to “fix things.” Do private schools REALLY do a better job of educating our youth? Not overall, according to studies that control for things like SES. Do Charters REALLY do a better job of educating out youth? Not overall, according to studies that control for things like SES. Some Charters are great. Some private schools are great. Some traditional public schools are great. And ALL three systems also have their share of failures.

So then, why the big push for Charter and vouchers? Money in someone’s pockets.

Jane W.

July 25th, 2012
3:54 pm

@Poof: I’m self-employed. As a public sector employee(?) you may be familiar with the old saw “Those that can, DO … and the rest teach.”

That is of course quite wrongfully applied to many thousands of teachers who put in a decent day’s work in classrooms nationwide—without calling undo attention to themselves or theatrically bemoaning their imagined “plight”.

shirley

July 25th, 2012
3:57 pm

Maureen,
Thanks for keeping the faith and pushing all of us to understand the education issues facing Georgia children, their families, teachers and school districts. It does cost money and for a few years now Georgia has reduced per pupil funding for k to 12 public education, if I recall correctly. We can fund water, bridges, roads, transit and all manner of improvements but without making reforms that serve to drastically improve the education of Georgia’s children we will fail to sustain and grow our economy. It’s hard to imagine this isn’t a common goal, across the aisle, across political parties, across race, ethnicity and economic status and widely accepted by political, business and civic leaders of every generation. Keep pushing us.

William Casey

July 25th, 2012
4:02 pm

“… and those who know nothing about teaching complain about teachers.” (quote is an original)

Jane W.

July 25th, 2012
4:14 pm

Ron F: I’m deeply sorry if I disturbed your taxpayer-funded and health-insurance-covered leisure time contemplation of coming (autumn) work schedules.

Whatever was I thinking?

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
4:16 pm

The bottom line element of this issue is whether business (the private sector) or government (the public sector) will control education. That translates, to me, to mean whether profit or public service will control education.

This out-of-balance, imo, “small government” ideology by Republicans has been decades in the making. Now, we are all experiencing the culmination of it. As a retired educator, I am advocating for public service over profit in education. Vote the Democratic ticket this November.

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
4:18 pm

@William – And that “old saw” was actually not at all about public K12 teachers, but about failed musicians, actors, writers, and artists who taught instead of (or until) they could live off their craft.

@I love teaching…a few years back, a women’s magazine I used to subscribe to ran article about “homing from work” – it gave tips on how to take care of personal business on company time. The crazy thing about it was that even if I had wanted to, I could apply any of the so-called tips to my day as a teacher. Funny.

I haven’t always been a teacher – I was in the military, and worked in the private sector for a Fortune 500 company as well as a family-owned business – I also have lots of friends who work in a wide variety of careers and companies. All situations have pros and cons – my advice is that if you don’t like your situation, no matter what it is, you may want to make a change. However, I’ll pull out another “old saw” – the grass is always greener on the other side. Like the guy who said, “Before I was married, I had 6 theories about raising kids – now I have six kids and no theories,” teaching looks like an easy gig from the outside – and good teachers may make it look even more so. Coming in from a non-ed background, I had a lot of ideas – the reality is that it is an enormously complex issue, there is no one solution, the blame game doesn’t work, and just because you sat in a classroom doesn’t mean you are qualified to run one.

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
4:23 pm

Aristotle and Einstein had something a little different to say:

Those who educate children well are more to be honored than parents, for these only gave life, those the art of living well.
Aristotle

It is the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in creative expression and knowledge.
Albert Einstein

dbow

July 25th, 2012
4:48 pm

Back in Florida there was a principal that came into a school that was rated F every year since the ratings began. Pahokee High school has turned out more pro football players than any other school in the country. Unfortunately, these athletes can’t read or do math or much of anything else. This principal came in and cleaned house. Fired the football coaches and moved all the throphies and even the trophy cases to the back of the school where no one could see them. She declared that the school would no longer be known as a footbal school and she changed the culture of the school in one fell swoop. The community was outraged and called for her firing. The school board didn’t cave in(this time) and within a year she had that school up to a D. Seven years as a perrennial F rated school and in one year she brought them up. Since then the school has been a C school. Pahokee is one of the poorest, most crime ridden cities in America where almost 100% of the student population is on free/reduced lunch. By changing the focus of the school, she made the students better. She made the community better. It’s still a terrible place to live, but it goes to show you that with a little courage and the willingness to accept change, improving our schools is possible.
The best part of the story is that the principal did it without the help of the Federal govt or Bill Gates or any other outside interference. I’m not a fan of hers for other reasons, but she has to be given her props for having the guts to change the culture of an entire community.
If she can do it there, we can do it here. All we need are some real leaders willing to buck the trend of falling over themselves for the allmighty Federal dollar and really lead.

skipper

July 25th, 2012
4:50 pm

Maureen,
Nobody wants to give up, but the incompetant buffons running places like APS, Hancock County, Albany, and other similar places will never see success, despite any programs, money, or whatever. I ain’t writing folks off (or am I,) but as long as folks (black, white, or green) concentrated in these areas have kids when they are kids, care more about getting on the welfare wagon (ask teachers from this area) and have no home training that TRULY (not superficially) pushes an education, they are what they are. Albany, as many have confirmed, has gone to h$ll in a hand-basket. I know you have to try, but there is not anybody out there that truly pays attention that can say any of these places will be any better ten years from now. Cuss me, but check back in ten years! What we are doing “ain’t workin’” folks! Money is not the answer!!!! These places either start the entire system over (laws and all) or we get on blogs like Maureen’s and argue ten years from now facing a situation worse than it is now!

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
4:56 pm

@ Fran Millar

what has the legislature being doing to cut its own fat? you have long been quick to look at us, but charity -and fiscal responsibility-begin at home. what has the golden dome crowd done to make itself lean and mean?

you are in a unique position to know just how little educators in Georgia actually make. I’m curious sir if you and your colleagues have been working under frozen wages for the better part of a decade.
we have.

how has the legislature furloughed itself? please sir, provide specifics.

I was -emphasis, was-employed at GPC until the ousted management spent it into oblivion. like 281 other fellows, I lost my job due to massive fiscal mismanagement. had any cuts be made to the massively bloated middle management Dr. Tricoli grew so aggressively, it is very likely far, far, far fewer than 282 people would have been let go. but GPC chose to do what state government does best – sacrifice worker bees to protect the top.

is short, avoid making hard and lasting decisions in favor of politically expedient quick fixes.

by calling on pay cuts for educators you are doing the exact same thing – again. as I mentioned earlier, you KNOW what we make. you know just how far these cuts won’t go, and the problems they WON’T fix.

lead by example-clean up your own house first, then come looking towards us.

while my points are harsh, and my opinions sharp, truth is we are not the enemy. Georgia’s educators are citizens and taxpayers too. we see the same problems you do, and more often than not have similar ideas on how to fix them. how about instead of lecturing at us – try talking to us?
not the Tricolis, the Halls, ect of the world – us. the people actually doing the work.

Bernie

July 25th, 2012
5:00 pm

Excellence in Education and Georgia is an OXYMORON!

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
5:01 pm

@ skipper

money is so not the answer at this point. its changing the culture of spending, nepotism, and cronyism
which has run education into the ground

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
5:05 pm

@ dbow

anyone in Georgia who tries to de-emphasis football won’t last a semester.

Solutions

July 25th, 2012
5:12 pm

More money going to education just means more money going to teachers. They are being fully compensated now, some of us think they are overcompensated. I urge pay cuts for all public employees until this economic crisis has passed.

BehindEnemyLines

July 25th, 2012
5:22 pm

re: “Why are the teachers who have to implement these “reforms” and mandates never consulted about how they will play out in the real world? ”

Because they represent a large portion of the most overpaid & underperforming employees to ever rip off an honest working taxpayer at gunpoint. It’s hard to imagine any group less deserving of trust with a decision of any importance, and impossible to imagine one less deserving of trust involving my money.

That’s why.

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
6:11 pm

A program on PBS-TV, in the last few days, presented research done by a group (I didn’t catch the name of the research group because I only saw the broadcast for a few minutes.) which determined, with great accuracy, which high school students will end up dropping out of school. Those particular students are best identified while they are still in middle school, the research group concluded. The results were obvious but very accurate, said the presenter.

There are three possible indicators of which students will end up being high school drop-outs – any one of which will accurately predict those students who will, subsequently, drop out of high school. Below are the indicators.

The student:

(1) Has failed either an English or mathematics class in middle school.

(2) Has received a failing grade in behavior in any of his/her academic subjects in middle school.

(3) Has attended school less than 80% of the time while in middle school.

A principal, in an interview on this PBS broadcast, spoke enthusiastically regarding the validity of the study, based on her personal experience as a middle school principal who had used the data provided to her so that she was able alter the lives of those particular students.

===================================================

Why cannot public schools be “reformed,” from within, to target these particular students to provide them with special tutorial help in their English and/or mathematics classes while they are in middle school, or to provide them with special individual and/or group counseling regarding interpersonal dynamics to help with their behavior, or to establish mentors for them who will encourage their daily attendance at school?

Committing to such an in-house program in traditional public schools would raise test scores, cut back significantly on high school drop-outs, and produce a higher calibre of student who will graduate from high school, and who will elect either to attend college or to seek employment within the business community immediately after high school?

Why are public charter schools needed to accomplish this kind of improvement, in which this kind of problem can be diagnosed accurately, and effective solutions can prescribed to solve the significant drop-out problem that is so prevalent throughout the nation? Solving this problem would need expertise in the teaching/counseling staff within traditional public schools, as well as sufficient funding for these specific areas of need in these targeted students.

This is one plan for accomplishing school reform within traditional public schools. Reform can happen within traditional public schools if there is school and community commitment to make it happen, and if political ideology does not resist its happening from within.

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
6:20 pm

Correction: My third paragraph from the end of my 6:11 pm post should have ended with a period, and not with a question mark. That particular sentence/paragraph was a statement, not a question.

Courtney

July 25th, 2012
6:30 pm

Charter Schools are never going to work. That is a fact. Now lets move on to helping our children get a good education and helping Georgia train its future workers.

Ron F.

July 25th, 2012
6:34 pm

@Jane W. “Ron F: I’m deeply sorry if I disturbed your taxpayer-funded and health-insurance-covered leisure time contemplation of coming (autumn) work schedules.”

Yet again, you are wrong. I am paid for 190 days per year. That amount is divided by 12 and paid each month. So, to be factual, any days I work beyond that are days I choose to do so without pay. It would be like you working on a Saturday and receiving no extra pay. This is common in many jobs where salary is a set amount regardless of hours worked. And I pay quite a bit of money each month, as I am sure you do, to make sure I have health benefits. That comes out of every check every month, so there is no “free” time. I’ve worked the hours and days, plus some, to earn it.

dbow

July 25th, 2012
6:37 pm

All sports should be reduced in stature and any kid that wants to participate should be academically qualified. It’s not happening in the middle schools.

yuzeyurbrane

July 25th, 2012
6:38 pm

Fran Millar, I appreciate your non-response to my questions. You are indeed skilled at a politician’s craft. Give an answer to something other than the question posed and accuse, as in your class warfare accusation. What a good diversion. I will read the bills to which you refer but would still like a responsive response to my questions. It would help if you would post a website or link to the legislation in question.

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
6:39 pm

@ Ron

let it go.
“Jane” is at best a nutcase, most likely a bored 14 year old trying to his/her ya yas

Ron F.

July 25th, 2012
6:49 pm

Mary Elizabeth: the main reason schools can’t be reformed from within lies in the approach we have taken to education for decades. The top-down model, where decisions regarding curricula and programs are made by administrators,etc. at the district level, is the root of the problem. I’ve had superintendents and principals who did their best to take a bottom-up approach, and have seen much greater success with groups of kids with specific needs. We’ve places far too much power and control in the hands of those who see big picture approaches that often don’t work for all kids affected. One of the reasons charter schools are becoming so popular is because of the failures of systems like APS where the top-down model is corrupt and fraught with waste. One can hardly blame people for demanding a totally different model considering the issues in many of the metropolitan Atlanta systems. The effects that current reform movements will have on successful districts is acceptable collateral damage to many who would like to dismantle public education.

The other issue, and you have eloquently addressed both by the way, is that society in general wants a quick cure for the problems. Some, like the dysfunctional boards in Atlanta and Dekalb, could be solved quickly if the legislature was interested in actually doing something to improve public education. It’s quicker, and in many people’s eyes, easier to just abandon the whole system and start something new. The fact that we have no way to know how that will work, and current data suggests it won’t, doesn’t matter. It will only be after several years and a lot of wasted money that we’ll learn what we had was far more fixable than the mess we’ll be in then.

Ron F.

July 25th, 2012
7:05 pm

@skipper and bootney: Sadly, far too few schools or districts will ever see the forest for the trees, so to speak. They’ll never realize that true reform is possible, and cheap, if you take each individual school and make some tough choices to change it. We can rewrite the entire design of schools in this country, turn them all into charters or private schools, and worship at the feet of Bill Gates until we’re blue in the face, and nothing will be 100% effective unless it reforms school by school, community by community, based on need. We’ve allowed and even encouraged far too much decision-making power in layer upon layer of management and are about to give a LOT of control to an appointed commission at the state level that will likely very seriously impact school structure across the state. Politics and the smell of money are the motivators, and no reform model will work in that environment, I’m afraid.

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:18 pm

@ Ron

for the most part, sadly, I agree. education has become so completely politicized by all sides (including ours, frankly) it has become unable to function. the democrats want this, republicans that, race firsters something else, the list is endless.

education nationwide no longer exists to teach. it exists to sustain itself.

if you’re old enough, you might remember Ike warned of the military-industrial complex. later, the villain was “big oil”. seems to me both are amateurs compared to big education.

Jane W.

July 25th, 2012
7:22 pm

@Ron F (cc: Blabney Farnsworth):

So as a public school teacher in an average school district you work 180-190 days per year (9 months) while receiving health care coverage for the full 365 days. The total cost of your State Health Benefit Plan is 75% paid for by the taxpayers, and the monthly premium for you (family coverage) is only around $200 if you’re non-smokers. Correct?

And that health coverage is guaranteed renewable after retirement at similarly subsidized rates throughout your lifetime and that of your spouse.

Wonder if any private sector workers can hope to match those heath benefits?

ref: http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/state-workers-teachers-to-866540.html

SEE

July 25th, 2012
7:24 pm

My boys do not plan on going to a party school…so I’m not worried about UGA’s first-year requirements.

Ron F.

July 25th, 2012
7:24 pm

“if you’re old enough, you might remember Ike warned of the military-industrial complex. later, the villain was “big oil”. seems to me both are amateurs compared to big education.”

Not quite that old, but I’ve heard the quote many times. Considering the current climate, I’d have to agree with you. And even with state budget cuts, there’s still a lot of money to be made and plenty lining up for a shot at it.

SEE

July 25th, 2012
7:24 pm

oops, wrong blog!

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:25 pm

@ Maureen

two questions:

1-could you invite Fran to join us in a moderated blog hall meeting? he has much to say about us, perhaps he might be willing to say it to us. some of us are his direct constituents after all. and all of us are potentially affected by his proposals.

2-does the AJC have any records which -if any- of our state/local politicians have accepted donations from anyone with a fiscal axe to grind (book & software publishers, computer vendors, office furniture vendors, ect) in supplying education?

as an aside, I’m very curious if anyone pushing for privatization has received monies or in kind support from companies/individuals who would benefit from privatization?

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:33 pm

@ Jane

why don’t you speak ill of my mother while you’re acting like a third grader?
you should consider posting in a green font – it would suit you.

but to your “point” I can’t speak for HS, but my healthcare contribution was well over $400 per month.

I also did well more than 9 months, closer to 11. the difference made up via my leave.

and health care is available for spouses under certain circumstances. its not a slam dunk, sorry.

after reading your posts, seems at the end of the day your main issue is you made a bad career choice and ended up for a company which doesn’t value its workers.

or had the buying power of the entire state of Georgia. volume discounts is a concept you ought to be able to understand. if not, I’m sure one of our posters is an Econ instructor and can walk you thru it.

Ron F.

July 25th, 2012
7:37 pm

“the monthly premium for you (family coverage) is only around $200 if you’re non-smokers. Correct?”

Some years ago it was $200 or so a month. More like $350 now (employee plus children- employee, spouse, and children is higher). And there are companies out there that pay 50% or more of employee insurance costs as an employment benefit. The benefits are offered as incentives and are common in this country. As a self-employed person, you bear the total cost, and I’m sure it’s high. Check the healthcare offered to senators and representatives at the nation level and you’ll see what “free” healthcare looks like. They have a sweetheart deal you or I could never get as middle-class Americans. As I’ve posted to you I’m sure, you’re more than encouraged to come try out the job. The benefits are nice, but it’s a lot harder work than many think. I doubt I could be self-employed and succeed (I’m not business-savvy enough), and I love what I do as a teacher.

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:40 pm

oh, “Jane”

since you seem so distressed to not have the great and glorious bennies of the mythical teachers unions in Georgia,

GAE happily accepts associate members. sign up today! go getcha some!

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:41 pm

@ Ron,

I’d have loved me some $200 a month for family.
come to think of it, I had that about 15 or so years ago.

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:43 pm

one would think a business person would understand the concept of perks to attract workers.
but if they don’t understand the concept of bulk buying power and the leverage that gives ….

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:46 pm

@ Ron,

do you think “Jane” needs a hug?

catlady

July 25th, 2012
7:46 pm

BTW, it’s educationAL excellence.

bootney farnsworth

July 25th, 2012
7:49 pm

did we forget AL?

Fred in DeKalb

July 25th, 2012
8:33 pm

Fred in DeKalb

July 25th, 2012
8:47 pm

I forgot to mention that I happened to see this also.

Mikey D.

July 25th, 2012
8:48 pm

@Jane W.
Since you didn’t answer my last question to you, I’ll assume that you are unable to. Thanks for verifying that you cannot provide any research or data to back up your assertions here. That clears it up for everyone, and we can now simply regard you as an angry malcontent with nothing of substance to add to the discussion.
But maybe you can answer this one for me… If teaching is such an easy, cushy job and the benefits are sooooo great as you insist, and teachers barely have to do anything at all to get this awesome salary and extraordinary benefits practically free of charge, then WHY ON EARTH don’t you come and join us? I mean, you are obviously bitter about how good we have it and how tough your life is. So what’s holding you back from jumping in and living the high life with the rest of us. Also, according to you, you’ll gain access to the mysterious, secret lake house that the union provides for our use, as well as those awesome bonus checks that we get from the union just for coming on here and posting on this blog. Think about it…. You spend practically all day on this blog anyway. Why not get paid for it?
What do you say? Are you going to join us and finally live in the lap of luxury that all teachers enjoy? It’s only logical, right?

Ron F.

July 25th, 2012
8:58 pm

bootney: After nearly 25 years with rooms full of teenagers, one naysaying adult isn’t nearly all that hard to deal with in general. Ironically, all the criticism does is make me more determined to teach with passion and dedication. They’ll tear down the public school system and I’ll be shoveling the rubble to make room for the kids I have left and keep on doing the job.

madrussian

July 25th, 2012
8:58 pm

@seabeau As you mentioned, this was a private school where the students most likely came from higher income homes and lacked the issues that face many inner city children. Your example shows how little you understand public education. It’s the politics that is screwing it up. Read Catlady’s post. Teachers use to be allowed to do their jobs which is to teach. They didn’t have to jump through hoops to make a decision regarding discipline, curriculum, etc. It’s completely different now and it’s not often that we find principals that will allow their teachers to do their jobs. Luckily I do work for one but still have the bureaucratic meddling of the central office to make my job difficult. Many parents are completely vacant from their child’s upbringing. Do the research before you make uninformed comparisons. You my friend, have qualified as a plebe.

Chip

July 25th, 2012
9:01 pm

Our past two Governors with all their advisors and many members of the General Assembly consider themselves experts on education – at least, what is best for you. Rather than demonstrating leadership and taking action – which yes, includes some new money and some restructure (not all some seek but at least some). However, these people want to debate what is best and never compromise. So, we have segments that think money does not matter or charter schools all the way or some other approach. Well, time continues to pass and despite all the political rhetoric, this state is not getting better. Any gains are far exceededy other states. We are dumb, jobless hicks! But hey, our politicians have their power, they have their answers and if they keep debating long enough, they will have been re-elected enough times to be a House Speaker Pro Tem or a Senate Majority Leader or even a President Protem of the Senate. No wonder education has been a 50+ year problem in this state!

Pride and Joy

July 25th, 2012
9:07 pm

This infuriates me “While the “average student” gets an allocation of 1.0, an English learner might get an allocation of 1.2.”
ILLEGAL ALIENS not only rob me of my tax dollars, they get preferential treatment and get even MORE than my own law-abiding children.
Gee, if I were a police officer I would be pulling over every illegal U turn, traffic light violation, expired tag and so on to ensure I could check everyone’s legal papers.
ILLEGAL ALIENS GET OUT NOW!

CCMST

July 25th, 2012
9:17 pm

@Jane W. – here ya’ go: http://dch.georgia.gov/00/channel_title/0,2094,31446711_51841234,00.html Information on retirement health care benefits. It’s not quite as rosy as you would like to picture it, but it’s better than nothing.

FWIW, I pay $397 per month for my HRA (medical savings account/insurance). That’s for a family and includes a surcharge for my spouse – because he could be insured by his company we have to pay that.

Mary Elizabeth

July 25th, 2012
9:17 pm

@Ron F, 6:49 pm

Thank you for your in depth, and astute, response to my post at 6:11 pm. I have some thoughts to share with you, in return, but I am a little tired this evening. I need a good night’s sleep to be able to express my thoughts as cogently as I would wish. I’ll respond to you in more detail tomorrow, on this thread. Have a nice evening, Ron. Best to you.

Jane W.

July 25th, 2012
9:21 pm

@ Blabney Farnsworth: Honestly, we need not know your every waking thought. You could find a second hobby—gardening maybe—and give your keyboard a rest?

Married with (School) Children

July 25th, 2012
9:55 pm

Maureen Downey @ 10:59 AM on July 25th, 2012 – you rightly pointed out that those states leading the nation “are investing in preschool and teacher quality, raising rigor and adopting and sticking to whole school reform plans.”

I think that the state of preschool/pre-K in Georgia would be a great topic for a full AJC article. While leading states are heavily investing in real pre-K instruction, in my Georgia districts, “pre-K” is nothing more than the state providing free daycare to those parents who were lucky enough to win the drawing for an open slot in the class.

Also, they shameful way that Dekalb County is treating its pre-K teachers is also worthy of an article, IMHO.

Laurie

July 25th, 2012
10:34 pm

“Today, the state is only footing 38 percent of the education tab in Georgia.”
Someone needs to tell the state of Georgia. If you go to the state’s web site page for practice assessments, one of the questions (https://www.georgiaoas.org/servlet/a2l
Test 141 – problem 8) says:

8. Public Schools in Georgia are funded PRIMARILY by [choices include state funds, local funds, feds, lottery].

The credited answer is state funds.

Laurie

July 25th, 2012
11:21 pm

Oh, and by the way, I’m the Laurie who more frequently posts on Get Schooled, and I did NOT write the post above about special ed student funding (the only post I’ve posted today is the one about the Georgia assessments).

crankee-yankee

July 26th, 2012
12:40 am

@Jane

My family coverage (spouse & children) = $518.91/mo
Where do you get your data?
The inaccuracies you spout are beyond ludicrous, they are comical.
Thank you for the levity you have interjected to this serious discussion.

Dr. Craig Spinks/ Georgians for Educational Excellence

July 26th, 2012
1:30 am

Achieving educational excellence in my home state will require much more than money.

Dr. Craig Spinks/ Georgians for Educational Excellence

July 26th, 2012
1:34 am

Ron F.,

Passion and dedication on the parts of her teachers, administrators and other school staff are two of the non-monetary prerequisites for educational excellence in Georgia.

seabeau

July 26th, 2012
5:51 am

Retired Teacher Now; I agree with all of your points about my situation! And the public needs to help the physical and mentally challenged. The rest of the situations you refer to are the results of human stupidly and poor decision making. The public should not have to pay for these problems. Life is hard, farmers and Micky Dee’s are hiring every day.

Mary Elizabeth

July 26th, 2012
6:47 am

@Ron F, 6:49 pm

Good morning, Ron. I want you to know that, essentially, I agree with your post to me, last evening.

You wrote: “(T)he main reason schools can’t be reformed from within lies in the approach we have taken to education for decades. The top-down model, where decisions regarding curricula and programs are made by administrators,etc. at the district level, is the root of the problem.”

School systems must change this top-down approach and implement substantive reform within, so that the ideological agenda of dismantling public schools for corporate control of schools is stopped. Here are some of my thoughts (addressed to you, btw) that explain why this must occur, in greater detail, from my own blog, “Mary Elizabeth Sings,” written within my blog entry entitled, “About Education: Essay # 5, Assessing Teachers and Students” on Februrary 25, 2012:

“Several years ago, when a local school system mandated that all 8th grade students take Algebra for their 8th grade mathematics course (regardless of where each student was individually functioning), I predicted that at least half of those 8th grade students would fail that course, and they did. Many of those 8th grade students were, unintentionally, ’set up’ for failure by an unknowing County Office mandate that was actually intended to increase the standards for all 8th graders. It is unfortunately true that many highly educated educators still do not know these specific instructional truths, because professional educators specialize in various areas of expertise. More value must be placed upon perceptive teachers’ input regarding instruction (such as yours). All educators want students to achieve to their maximum growth each year in every curricululm area, but, to achieve that end, each child MUST be taught where he or she is functioning at point in time, which is referred to as the student’s Instructional Level.”

(My blog entry of January 15, 2012, entitled “About Education: Essay # 1, Mastery Learning” explains each student’s accurate instructional level, as opposed to his or her frustration level, or independent level – whatever his or her grade level – with greater detail.)

Please read my detailed post at 3:41 pm yesterday, on this thread, regarding the interconnection between the U. S. Chamber of Commerce, ALEC, the Georgia Chamber of Commerce, HR 1162 sponsored by Rep. Jan Jones and supported by many other legislators (the amendment to Georgia’s Constitution which would establish public charter schools by state authority outside of local school districts jurisdiction to be voted on this November). There are forces at work in our nation that are intent upon minimizing government, service-oriented jobs for private sector control of these services. I am not pleased with that because I believe that corporations, vital thought they are to business and for jobs in our nation and world, perpetuate a hierarchial view of humanity. I believe that public service jobs, on the other hand, understand more readily an egalitarian view of humanity. My hope is that the world will evolve in a more equitable, egalitarian direction than a hierarchial one in which power and wealth are the primary values, instead of the values of cooperation and spiritual and intellectual development of humanity, which the egalitarian vision understands.

Here are the views of Jay Bookman, which I have excerpted from his July 18, 2012 column in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution entitled, “GOP here looks to match voucher program in La.”:

“When fully implemented, the Louisiana program has the potential to shift well over a billion dollars a year in taxpayer money out of the public system into the hands of private for-profit and non-profit schools. Surely that gives state officials not just the right but the obligation to ensure that the money is well-spent and delivers quality education. But that’s counter to the philosophy driving the school voucher movement.

The program was signed into law by Jindal in April and takes effect immediately. The result has been an educational gold rush. For example, Reuters reports that New Living Word, the school offering the most open slots to voucher students, “has a top-ranked basketball team but no library. Students spend most of the day watching TVs in barebones classrooms. Each lesson consists of an instructional DVD that intersperses Biblical verses with subjects such chemistry or composition.”

I urge readers to read Bookman’s article in full. Here is the link:

http://blogs.ajc.com/jay-bookman-blog/2012/07/18/is-louisiana-the-future-of-georgias-education-system/
========================================================

I do understand the concern of the parents of students in some of the lower functioning metro school systems, but I am concerned that if an across-the-board voucher program, and subsequent dismantling of traditional public schools, occur through Georgia’s legislative actions, that many of the students who will end up dropping out of schools will be even more adversely effected because not all students can attend public charter schools, and if they could, why not simply reform the traditional schools, from within?

Here are the words of a poster last evening, in this regard:

“Maureen Downey @ 10:59 AM on July 25th, 2012 – you rightly pointed out that those states leading the nation ‘are investing in preschool and teacher quality, raising rigor and adopting and sticking to whole school reform plans.’ ”

Some of the schoolwide instructional innovations which I mentioned in my 3:41 pm post yesterday especially for potential high school drop outs, I was able to see implemented in my own greater Atlanta high school with a 98% African-American population. How was I able to get these programs established in a top-down educational system? I spoke with several principals of that school, one on one, over the years about various programs which would enhance student growth. Those principals were all committed to student improvement. I never had a principal to turn down my innovative ideas. We made them reality, and we helped many students in the process. Reform can be done within traditional public schools but teacher input must be valued, as you say, or we will live to see traditional public schools dismantled in Georgia to serve the business world’s idea of education. You and I both know that that model is not what is needed across-the-board in education for many reasons. We must, instead, reform public education so that it remains a public institution in its humanitarian and egalitarian values and so that it also delivers educational excellence for ALL students.

HappyTeacher

July 26th, 2012
7:44 am

Seabeau,
You aren’t being realistic, because you gave statistics for one group of students. I have taught students who attended private schools and many of them were not prepared for the district’s curriculum. A large number of them used drugs and had sex just like many of today’s teens. Additionally, one student had an abortion and told ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL of her friends. Go figure………….

Misty Fyed

July 26th, 2012
7:46 am

Here we go again. Another article linking education excellence to funding.

Pride and Joy

July 26th, 2012
8:15 am

Ron and Bootney. I hear ya. The premiums for my health insurance alone (just me, not my family’s coverage) is more than $5,000 a year — just for the premiums. I haven’t paid $200 a month for health insurance — ever.

bootney farnsworth

July 26th, 2012
8:16 am

@ “Jane”

there is the most amazing thing on your computer. the on/off button.
please feel free to explore it uses.

sadly, since I was recently RIFed from GPC – I lost my gov’t job, does that make your day better?- I have time on my hands. I remain passionate about education, so …..

bootney farnsworth

July 26th, 2012
8:17 am

Fran?

oh Fran?

gonna come out and play with us?

williebkind

July 26th, 2012
8:35 am

“We must, instead, reform public education so that it remains a public institution in its humanitarian and egalitarian values and so that it also delivers educational excellence for ALL students.”

Now is that not a really good socialistic view for all of us to jump on board? Ok I am bored of reading these pedant rants about public education. I need a chart broken down by race, gender, political background, income, religious values etc. I want to see who really is doing well and who is not. You guys are throwing darts not at the dartboard but at the wall.

carlosgvv

July 26th, 2012
9:07 am

Maureen – 10:59

The only education improvement you will see from most Georgia charter schools will be a much larger number of students able to quote lengthy volumes of scripture from the Bible.

bootney farnsworth

July 26th, 2012
9:19 am

@ carlos

you know that how? I worked with serveral DeKalb charter schools and none specialized in bible quotations. zero. most were interested in science and low performing/at risk students.

if you have specifics to back up your claim, please share them

Dr. John Trotter

July 26th, 2012
9:26 am

Testing, charter schools, benchmarks, etc., do not significant improve public education. In fact, in many cases, they negatively affect achievement.

What significantly improves public education is establishing and maintaining strong classroom discipline…so that even the many, many lazy, rotten, unmotivated, defiant, and disruptive “students” are not allowed to disrupt the learning processes of those students who actually want to learn. The key to learning is motivation, and the motivation to learn is a cultural phenomenon. It appears that the Asian American students are highly motivated to learn, and, as a demographic group, they out-perform all other groups. I was talking yesterday to an Asian-American student (from China) who has just finished with a biology degree from Mercer and is contemplating either medicine or pharmacy for grad school (after working for a year in one of my favorite Chinese restaurants). His girlfriend (Vietnamese American) is already in medical school.

No one ever seems to address motivation or discipline as it relates to student achievement. You have to have discipline in order first before you will ever have student achievement realized, and, as we have said at MACE since MACE’s inception in 1995, you can’t have good learning conditions until you first have good teaching conditions. Until teachers are supported when it comes to classroom discipline, all of this other “stuff” (yes, this “stuff”) is like p*ssing into a big tsunami. The “stuff” won’t make any difference. It never has and it never will.

It’s always another commission appointed by another governor. None of it worked in the past and none will work in the future. That’s right. NONE of it works. These education commissions are fruitless. They are pure acts of folly. We are worse off today in Georgia than we were 30 years ago. I remember when Governor Joe Frank Harris’s Quality Basic Education (QBE) Act came down the pike. Everyone (yes, ALL of the politicians in the State!) were praising it to high heavens. I spoke out publicly against it from the very beginning. I said that QBE stood for “Quit Being an Educator” or “Quit Brutalizing Educators.” It was a disastrous program, and I knew it was going to be disastrous. Many parts of the OBE program have since been dismantled – but not enough! QBE, like No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, are the feeble and misguided attempts of legislators to “reform” public education. These programs do much, much more harm than good. Please spare us from any more “reform” attempts!

MACE has always spoken out against such laughable attempts to reform public education without first addressing student motivation to learn and student discipline. You can fool around putting a different brand or grade of oil in the motor, but if there is no gas in the tank or someone dumped a pound of sugar in the gas tank, then the car will not run. It is just that simple. If the myopic politicians refuse to address motivation and discipline, then it does not matter what financing formula they come up with. Nothing will change.

http://www.theteachersadvocate.com

http://www.georgiateachersspeakout.com

bootney farnsworth

July 26th, 2012
9:28 am

@ Fran Millar,

I remain puzzled about your approach to Georgia’s budget issues. you seem determined to see teachers wages cut, but as far as I can tell have been publically silent on the issue concerning bloated middle management.

take my former employer GPC for example. a quick look at the GPC 282 (those laid off due to fiscal mismanagement) show lots of worker bees and next to none of the Assistant Directors, Directors, Associate Directors, Vice Presidents, Assistant Vice Presidents, Associate Vice Presidents, ect which exploded under Tricoli.

I may be a poor dumb unemployed educator, but even I can figure out the costs of keeping a classroom support technician are much lower than a Assistant Director.

Can you explain your thinking on this issue sir?

bootney farnsworth

July 26th, 2012
9:31 am

@ Dr. John

MACE have any clue why the disipline issue is so uniformally ignored?
it seems like some kind of social pathology to deny we have disipine issues

Holly Jones

July 26th, 2012
10:07 am

@Bootney – I think the avoidance is due to now knowing how to address the issues. We can say “Kick ‘em out” but where will they go? Educate them or incarcerate them, those are your options. I agree wholeheartedly that classroom discipline is imperative AND absent in many cases. So, how do we hold parents accountable for their kid’s behavior? We’re always hearing about the teachers’ accountability, but I never hear anyone hold the parents or, heaven forbid, the students accountable for learning. The kids know Mom and Dad will swoop in and argue their way out of any punishment- I saw it happen when I taught and it’s one of the main reasons I don’t want to go back into a classroom. We’ve all said it here- when we were in school, if you got in trouble at school, you got in trouble at home. Now, it’s if you get in trouble at school, your parents will say the teacher picks on you and it’s not your fault. How do we make the parents BE parents?

Dr. John Trotter

July 26th, 2012
10:20 am

@ Bootney: I am actually writing a “tome” which I feel addresses this in detail. Suffice it to say that the politicians either have no clue or they are abjectly afraid to address the problem. Mainly, I believe that it’s just gutlessness. It’s much easier to just blame teachers.

carlosgvv

July 26th, 2012
10:21 am

Dr. John Trotter

July 26th, 2012
10:23 am

I just noticed a glaring typo in the first line of my 9:26 AM statement. Should be “signficantly,” not “significant.” Please forgive. That’s what happens when I start pecking away before I even drink the first cup of coffee. Ha!

Prof

July 26th, 2012
10:34 am

@ carlosgw, 10:21 am. Just as an FYI–when clicked on, your link goes to: “404–page not found.”

Mary Elizabeth

July 26th, 2012
10:47 am

@Dr. John Trotter, 9:26 am

You, and others, may be interested in reading how I established good discipline in my own classroom of juniors and seniors in high school. My classroom was just down the hall from the Asst. Principal’s office for my grade level students. I initiated a private meeting with the Asst. Principal before the school year began, and presented my “game plan” for discipline to him. I said to the Asst. Principal, “When school opens for students this year, some students are probably going to test how far they can go with their new teacher. If you will allow me to “march” any (and every) student to your office as soon as that student misbehaves (and who will not cease his/her inappropriate behavior even with repeated warnings from me), I will promise you that after a week or two, I will have very few discipline problems for the remainder of the school year. The Asst. Principal agreed to my “plan” because I was a seasoned teacher at that point in time, and because he knew that I had a “method to my madness” so that my “plan” would no longer be necessary after a week or two. I knew that word would quickly get around among students that if any student misbehaved in my classes, that he or she would be sent immediately to the office and that I would receive support as the teacher in charge of her classroom. The remainder of the students in the class, having witnessed firsthand the support that was given to me by the Asst. Principal, would think twice before misbehaving in my classes – for the remainder of the school year. And, the bonus was that – because students talk among themselves – my “plan” had its positive effect even into the following school year, before I had even initiated my “plan” for that new school year, because students had already received word from the older students regarding what would happen to them if they misbehaved deliberately.

However, in terms of sustaining discipline without undue fear and tension in a classroom, I must add to my personal “testimony,” above, that one of the best ways to have excellent discipline in a classroom is for the teacher to plan engaging and motivating lessons for students, be engaged and motivated herself (or himself) during the full class period, and let the students know – through body language such as smiles and eye contact, as well as through caring dialogue – that she or he genuinely cares for each student, respects each student, and wants each student to reach his or her potential in the class.

I found that sustaining good discipline in the classroom needed a combination of both approaches. At least, that combination is what worked for me. The bottom line was that my students, I believe, cared for me, respected what I was trying to do for them, and knew that I really cared for each of them as unique human beings. And, those were the lasting feelings and impressions that I wanted to leave with my students – not fear and bitterness.

Prof

July 26th, 2012
10:49 am

@ Bootney Farnsworth, et al. Yesterday at 3:54 pm Jane W. stated that he/she is self-employed, in response to my note that he/she’d posted 5 times in yesterday alone. Perhaps this was more accurate than we know, and the postings themselves on education blogs such as “Get Schooled” are his/her source of payment and employment.

Double Zero Eight

July 26th, 2012
10:54 am

Education in GA will continue to be an “exercise in futility”,
unless there are significant improvements in parental
involvement and discipline. If funding was the most
important component, APS would be one of the top 10
school systems in the state.

Ron F.

July 26th, 2012
11:14 am

Mary Elizabeth: I’m sure you, like me, have worked for various types of prinicipals and county leaders. As you know, when you have a receptive principal who understands the skills of his teachers, you have the foundation for great change based on student needs. I think those principals are the exception now in many districts such as APS. Having read often on your blog, I too must shake my head as I contemplate what Georgia will do next when so many solutions are so simple and really not that hard to implement. Unfortunately, Louisiana has set the bar for reform and we both know the souther tier of states will all push to do the same, no matter what the data shows. Amazing, isn’t it, how much peer pressure influences even educated adults?

Mary Elizabeth

July 26th, 2012
11:44 am

Ron F., 11:14 pm

“Unfortunately, Louisiana has set the bar for reform and we both know the southern tier of states will all push to do the same, no matter what the data shows. Amazing, isn’t it, how much peer pressure influences even educated adults?”
———————————————————————–

Yes, it is amazing, Ron, and I have come to realize that this “following of one another,” either in educational arenas (or in healthcare arenas), is because of more than peer pressure, or because of more than belief in educational choice. In my opinion, much of the “domino effect” of politicians following one another has to do with personal monetary gain. It is the contacts made within a group that will create those financial benefits which will drive many to hold to their ideological positions. “You scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.”

It takes a true stateman, or stateswoman, to break from the norms of his or her area of the country and do what is best for students and teachers. Some will put on blinders, mentally, so that they will not have to see the full impact of what they are doing to public education by not funding it adequately or by trying to dismantle it. Students have been hurt in this ideological battle to dismantle public education, and teachers and their families have, also, been hurt. Public charter schools should work with traditional public education for the benefit of all. Traditional public education should not be dismantled; it should be improved from within. And, it can be improved from within.

bill

July 26th, 2012
11:59 am

Ever consider that education in Georgia does work because some people don’t value it at all. Too many people who rather save money on taxes then education disabled and low income students. Well, guess what we have to educate all people, this is not nazi Germany. We value all citizens in the United States. We want all citiizens as independent as possible and educated as much as possible. Parents need to take an active role in their child’s education. Georgia is very capable of educationing all students both gifted and the ones in need of supports. Attitude toward education is the problem here and it’s lack of value. In today’s economy you better have a high school education and then some sort degree. This states’ football over education mentally is creating a food stamp culture.

Pride and Joy

July 26th, 2012
2:26 pm

ME, I loved your 10:47 post. You were proactive, involved, caring and professional.
Thank you,
P and J

bootney farnsworth

July 26th, 2012
7:48 pm

Fran?
oh Fran?

not inclined to debate with your constituents?

DeKalb residents, remember this come election time

long time educator

July 26th, 2012
8:10 pm

Jane W. sounds an awful lot like the former Good Mother. I nominate her for troll status and suggest she be ignored.

DeKalb Teacher

July 26th, 2012
9:31 pm

@Chip, That rant is quite unbecoming. Angry and bitter is no way to go through life.

Mary Elizabeth

July 27th, 2012
1:15 am

@Pride and Joy, 2:26 pm

ME, I loved your 10:47 post. You were proactive, involved, caring and professional.
Thank you,
P and J
=================================================

I appreciate your comments, Pride and Joy. Thank you.

Weekly Reader (7/27) | Leonard Presberg

July 27th, 2012
12:51 pm

[...] funding formula (which isn’t even fully funded) contributes less and less to our schools. And excellence isn’t even the goal anymore: “We are not going to come up with a formula that reaches for excellence. We are not putting an [...]