From the White House:
Today, the Obama Administration announced the President’s plan for the creation of a new, national Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Master Teacher Corps comprised of some of the nation’s finest educators in STEM subjects. The STEM Master Teacher Corps will begin with 50 exceptional STEM teachers established in 50 sites and will be expanded over 4 years to reach 10,000 Master Teachers.
These selected teachers will make a multi-year commitment to the Corps and, in exchange for their expertise, leadership and service, will receive an annual stipend of up to $20,000 on top of their base salary. The Administration will launch this Teacher Corps with the $1 billion from the President’s 2013 budget request currently before Congress.
President Obama said, “If America is going to compete for the jobs and industries of tomorrow, we need to make sure our children are getting the best education possible. Teachers matter, and great teachers deserve our support.”
Today, the Administration also announced that the President will immediately dedicate approximately $100 million of the existing Teacher Incentive Fund toward helping school districts implement high-quality plans to establish career ladders that identify, develop, and leverage highly effective STEM teachers. With an application deadline of July 27th, over 30 school districts across America have already signaled their interest in competing for funding to identify and compensate highly effective teachers who can model and mentor STEM instruction for their teaching peers, providing those teachers with additional compensation, recognition, and responsibilities in their schools.
These Administration plans build on a key recommendation of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), calling for a national STEM Master Teacher Corps to recognize and help retain America’s most talented STEM teachers, build a community of practice among them, raise the profile of the STEM teaching profession, and leverage excellent teachers to collaborate with their peers to strengthen STEM education in America’s public schools.
As part of the announcement, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, White House Domestic Policy Council Director Cecilia Muñoz, White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Director Dr. John Holdren, and PCAST Co-Chair Dr. Eric Lander will meet on Wednesday at the White House with outstanding math and science teachers to discuss efforts to strengthen teaching and learning in science, technology, engineering and mathematics and build up the STEM education profession.
Early in his Administration, President Obama called for a national effort to help move American students from the middle to the top of the pack in science and math achievement. The Obama Administration is committed to preparing young people both to learn deeply and think critically in STEM, and to equip them with the knowledge and skills necessary for jobs in the high-growth fields that fuel American innovation.
Improving STEM teaching is a key strategy to reaching this national goal. To meet this critical need, PCAST issued the Prepare and Inspire report, with a key recommendation calling for the creation of a new, national STEM Master Teacher Corps. Master Teachers are classroom-based educators who are highly effective in improving learning outcomes for their students, model outstanding teaching, and share their practices and strategies with their professional colleagues to lead and guide improvements across education. Master teachers know and are deeply interested in their subject, care about improving their craft, and inspire both their students and fellow teachers. PCAST recommended that the STEM Master Teacher Corps become a national resource – a networked community of outstanding public school teachers of STEM subjects who can serve as resources to each other and to other educators in schools and communities nationwide, and who would signal the value of STEM education to America’s future.
In order to ensure America’s students are prepared for success in an increasingly competitive global economy, we must do more to ensure that teaching is highly respected and supported as a profession, and that accomplished, effective teachers are guiding students’ learning in every classroom. The Obama Administration’s 2013 budget includes a new, $5 billion program – the RESPECT Project, which stands for Recognizing Educational Success, Professional Excellence, and Collaborative Teaching – that will boldly re-envision the teaching profession for the 21st Century. Today’s announcements build on the RESPECT project by supporting STEM master teachers as a key strategy to retain and reward our nation’s most accomplished STEM educators, and by enabling them to work in new ways to dramatically improve student achievement. Lifting up America’s teachers is critical to recruiting promising talent, retaining the best, and continuously improving outcomes for students.
The President will dedicate $1 billion from his 2013 budget request currently before Congress to launch a new, national STEM Master Teacher Corps.
As part of the RESPECT project, the STEM Master Teacher Corps will be supported by the U.S. Department of Education, and established in collaboration with independent, non-profit organizations and local public-private partnerships between STEM-related businesses and industries and school districts. Key parts of the plan include:
• A rigorous selection of the best and brightest math and science teachers from across the country: The STEM Master Teacher Corps will be established in 100 sites – each with 50 exceptional STEM teachers – and will be expanded over 4 years to reach 10,000 Master Teachers. Accomplished teachers will be selected for the STEM Master Teacher Corps through a highly competitive process, based on demonstrated effectiveness in teaching one or more STEM subjects, their content knowledge, and their contributions to the continuous improvement of teaching and learning both within their schools and across the community of STEM teachers. The selection process will be administered locally or regionally, but aligned to a set of national benchmarks.
• National recognition and rewards, including compensation to keep Corps members in the profession: STEM Master Teacher Corps members will benefit from a professional compensation structure that will make their profession more competitive with alternative careers, keeping the best teachers in the classrooms where they are needed. STEM Master Teacher Corps members will make a multi-year commitment to the Corps and, in exchange for their expertise, leadership and service, will receive an annual stipend of up to $20,000 on top of their base salary. This recognition further raises the prestige of the Corps members, enabling America’s classrooms to attract and secure the best talent in the STEM education profession.
• Corps members as a national resource, for their schools and for other STEM educators: STEM Master Teacher Corps members will be called to serve their profession and the nation, through an ongoing commitment to professional learning. They will build a community of teaching practice where they live, helping students excel in math and science while taking on leadership and mentorship roles in their schools and communities. Corps members will lead ongoing professional meetings and teacher development activities; assist their schools and school districts in evaluating and providing feedback to other teachers; and validate and disseminate effective practices to improve STEM instruction. They will participate in regular convenings to engage in professional development and share best practices; deepen their subject matter expertise; consult with experts in teaching and learning; and improve their instructional leadership and pedagogical content skills.
These efforts will be complemented as well by private sector responses to the President’s call for “all hands on deck” approach to excellence in STEM education, including Google’s commitment to convene education leaders and innovators to develop ideas to recognize, connect, and raise the profile of these STEM master teachers.
Today’s announcements align with the President’s belief that excellent STEM teaching requires both deep content knowledge and strong teaching skills, and his strong leadership in working to improve STEM education:
The President has announced an ambitious goal of preparing 100,000 additional STEM teachers over the next decade, with growing philanthropic and private sector support. This program would provide competitive awards to create or expand high-quality pathways to teacher certification and other innovative approaches for recruiting, training, and placing talented recent college graduates and mid-career professionals in the STEM fields in high-need schools. With the president’s leadership, over 115 organizations, led by Carnegie Corporation of New York and Opportunity Equation, came together to form the coalition “100Kin10” to help reach the President’s goal. These efforts have yielded a $22 million investment from philanthropic and private sectors toward helping to meet the President’s goal.
• Since 1983, the National Science Foundation’s Presidential Awards for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching (PAEMST) program has served as the nation’s highest honors for teachers of mathematics and science. Plans are underway to reconfigure PAEMST beyond its current scope to design new opportunities for PAEMST teachers to share their expertise and to continue to grow as professionals. Opportunities may include benefiting from NSF-sponsored international exchanges, collaborating with the research scientists and engineers funded by the NSF, and accessing scientific data and findings from NSF projects for use in their classrooms. These opportunities will allow PAEMST teachers to connect directly with NSF-funded science and education projects, so they can use the latest scientific findings, tools and data in their classrooms and with their colleagues, and even participate in frontier research. Additionally, NSF will help strengthen the cyber networks among the more than 4,000 PAEMST awardees over the past 29 years, and PAEMST awardees will have opportunities to serve as mentors and advisors to the next generation of STEM teachers. In the coming months, NSF will host a series of community forums for input in the design of these new components.
• The only competitive preference priority in the Race to the Top program was for states to develop a high quality plan to improve STEM education at the state level. All 12 awardees in the initial round of this $4 billion program earned points for this priority, and this emphasis was maintained through an additional $200M in funding to seven more states in Phase 3 of the Race to the Top competition.
• The Investing in Innovation (i3) program makes competitive awards to develop, validate, and scale up innovative programs, practices, and strategies that are effective in improving student outcomes. i3 has maintained a priority on promoting STEM education, to support innovative programs with evidence of impact from districts across the country. Next year, funds within i3 will also support the new Advanced Research Projects Agency for Education, which will foster breakthrough developments in educational technology and learning systems.
• In 2009, the President launched Educate to Innovate, a public-private partnership that brings together leading businesses, foundations, non-profits, and professional societies to improve STEM teaching and learning. As part of this effort, the President launched Change the Equation, a CEO-led effort to dramatically improve STEM education by mobilizing the business community to improve the quality of STEM education in the United States. This past February, Change the Equation announced that 24 member companies would expand five effective STEM programs in more than 130 new sites, benefiting nearly 40,000 students nationwide -over half of whom are in low-income schools.
–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog
75 comments Add your comment
Once Again
July 18th, 2012
3:48 pm
More money to buy more votes to achieve absolutely nothing with regards to educational improvement. Don’t expect anyone to followup with any studies to determine if this is effective and certainly don’t expect any accountability if it turns out to be just another in a long line of failed Obama stimuls payoffs.
» Blog Archive » Changing the Equation in STEM Education
July 18th, 2012
3:51 pm
[...] reading some of my fellow educators comments on a blog I found at, http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2012/07/18/obama-creates-elite-science-math-teaching-corps-an… , they are not seeing this initiative as a positive change. As an educator of technology of [...]
HS Math Teacher
July 18th, 2012
4:10 pm
As a reply to the above blog-master post, knowing how to write a business letter (when we had to speak into a dictaphone and someone in a secretarial pool would type your letter – late 70’s to early 80’s…before Macs came out) was the most important thing to know to survive in a white collar job. I worked for a Fortune 500 company that at one time ranked in the top 5 in diversified assets. I’d say English – Language Arts would be the most important subject to focus on before going out into the business world. I worked in corporate sales for about ten years, and while I did have to know some basic math, about 90% of my job had to do with communication. Any math that I had to contend with was with just basic math. When the home office came in and installed computers in our office, all the basic math went away.
Lee
July 18th, 2012
7:20 pm
The big question is “Do you REALLY want more federal government intervention in education?” After all, they have done SO WELL so far.
mitch
July 18th, 2012
9:11 pm
Not many believers here. So. If we had a super STEM teacher and he/she could teach super math to a fence post. What then. Jobs are being free traded to all corners of the earth. The President and Candidate Romney have one thing in common. Neither have a clue about the economy or having a successful career.
ScienceTeacher671
July 18th, 2012
9:36 pm
First, as Cindy said, students have to want to learn.
Secondly, if they can’t read and do math, they won’t do well in science.
I’m getting really tired of the assumption that teachers are the problem.
another view
July 18th, 2012
9:47 pm
Interesting- it appears there is little regard or respect for the pedagogiccal practices whcih make one effective. Teaching is an art that incorporates so many variables in order for one to be effective at it. I wonder where these elite teachers will be placed.
N. GA Teacher
July 18th, 2012
10:30 pm
A great idea that will have uninrneded consequences. First, the “elite 50″ will be removed from the clasroom so that they can do “workshops” for others. Although most schools are public, many of these “elites” will be taken from high profile private schools full of motivated, privileged kids. Therefore, like all the state curricula educrats, the “workshops” will mistakenly asume perfect behaviors and motivation by the students.
walterbyrd
July 18th, 2012
10:36 pm
No good reason for students to study STEM, that is the problem. Why study STEM when you will just end up having to train your H1B replacement? It makes no sense for Americans to compete with 3rd world wages. If you want US students to study STEM, let them know there will be a job for them.
Obama creates elite science, math teaching corps and seeks a billion to fund it | Get Schooled | Higher Education News - Abroad | Scoop.it
July 19th, 2012
1:34 am
[...] From the White House: Today, the Obama Administration announced the President’s plan for the creation of a new, national Science, Technology,… [...]
Michael F Langdon
July 19th, 2012
2:40 am
I would suggest reading the Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. It states that expertise requires 10,000 hours of effortful practice and that experts don’t necessarily make the best teachers. There are seven limitations of expertise and half of them have to do with teaching. To be honest, I am lucky to get 10,000 seconds of effort out of my students. They naively believe that there is some alchemists trick that will allow them to learn something with the snap of a finger. They really don’t believe it is just hard work and effort.
Wishful Science Teacher
July 19th, 2012
8:48 am
It would be nice if some of this money actually made its way into science classrooms. This would help tremendously. My science teaching materials budget was $800 this year. It was $2500 ten years ago. With the New Jersey state budget cuts, in education, our science department is scraping by on obsolete, worn, and minimal science equipment and materials for teaching lab science courses to students. Last year I spent over $500 out of my own pocket for materials to keep my classes going.
Pluto
July 19th, 2012
10:40 am
How are our friends in the government going to allocate any monies to education when there hasn’t been a budget passed through the senate in some three years? It must be an election year.
Obama Admin. Unveils $1-Billion “Master Teacher Corps” – The New American | News Blitz Weekly - Daily News Magazine
July 19th, 2012
11:01 am
[...] Atlanta Journal Constitution [...]
Dr. Clete Bulach
July 19th, 2012
11:43 am
Another ridiculous attempt by the Feds to improve education. If you want to improve education log on to this site and listen to some of the radio talk shows on how to do that.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/search/bulach/
dwhitt
July 19th, 2012
1:57 pm
We DO need more science teachers, but it is not a problem of there being a shortage of good science teachers. The issue is that schools are primarily graded on ELA and math test scores and usually employ half the number of science teachers as they do those for ELA and math. Despite already large class sizes, budget cuts required teaching positions to be eliminated. We want to do inquiry based lab activities with our students but that is difficult and sometimes dangerous with 30-40 students per class. On top of that cuts in supply money means pulling even more out of our pockets to buy supplies for activities. I’ve been a science coach working with teachers and I do think I did help some of them, but the real need is in having reasonable class sizes and time to prep for laboratory activities. One hour of planning time a day (that is often taken up with meetings anyway) is not sufficient to plan, set up labs, grade, and contact parents.
dwhitt
July 19th, 2012
2:10 pm
Most education dollars are already diverted to ELA and Math. While it is nice to see science recognized I’m sure most of this will also go towards the math part of STEM. While it is true that students need to be able to do math and read to be successful at the basic level in any other subject, it will not raise science scores to only concentrate on ELA and math. Science has it’s own logic, methods, and content. Students love science when they are allowed to actually do the activities. For that matter they often find reading and math more interesting when they are taught through science. However, this elite core is not where the money needs to go. It needs to go to adding more science positions and for supplies at the school level. Schools always hire fewer science and social studies teachers than are really needed because they know testing accountability will concentrate in ELA and math. I know of elementary school principals that tell their teachers in Februrary to stop teaching science and concentrate on the ELA and math because of the testing pressures. When students get to the 6th grade level and science begins to count more in school ratings they are often at the 3rd grade level when benchmarked simply because of lack of exposure. This is not because they had bad teachers. It’s because they didn’t get enough hands on science.
jgo
July 19th, 2012
2:54 pm
The USA to reduce the numbers of STEM workers who are unemployed or under-employed (in survival jobs in other fields). The current 1.8 million is far too many. Several recent studies have concluded we’ve been turning out about 3 times as many capable new STEM workers as we’ve been employing to do STEM work in the last few years (I’d say it’s since the 1980s), and dozens of researchers have concluded that we’ve had plenty.
I agree, however, that STEM workers should also have a grounding in language, history, philosophy (especially ethics), economics, mass communication… if only to be able to detect and counter propaganda like what pres. Obummer and the AJC are shoveling out.
When looking at education performance statistics be careful to make sure you’re comparing apples to apples, aggregates to aggregates, and selected sub-sets only to matched sub-sets. The USA has a sizable “under-class” who don’t value academic achievement, and other sub-sets which put a lot of store in academic credentials (degrees, grades, prizes/certificates…), but our core measures well against all others in the world. More and more of our HS seniors are taking the SAT and ACT tests. That means more with lower expectations are being drawn in, yet aggregate results have not fallen. Some countries refuse to participate in international tests (e.g. TIMMS, PISA), while others only have their very best participate, while US participation is near universal; yet our averages compared to the average of their select are respectable.
http://www.kermitrose.com/jgoEconData.html
jgo
July 19th, 2012
3:08 pm
oops Make that: “The USA needs to reduce the numbers of STEM workers who are unemployed…”
Sick
July 19th, 2012
5:17 pm
Ok do that and since I teach CTE I will send all my students to the REAL science/math teachers. Ugh! Disgusting. All disciplines are needed for these children, many who can’t READ or ADD! Obama is gonna make me vote ROMNEY.
Top news stories around the U.S. — What you missed while you were checking Facebook and Twitter | CengageBrainiac
July 20th, 2012
5:23 pm
[...] according an article from the AJC Get Schooled Blog article by Maureen Downey titled “Obama creates elite science, math teaching corps and seeks a billion to fund it.” Downey says, “The STEM Master Teacher Corps will begin with 50 exceptional STEM teachers [...]
mzaz
July 21st, 2012
11:07 am
marie smith – The Poor Have Been Voting For Democrats For 50-years; Guess What, They Are Still Poor.
concerned citizen
July 21st, 2012
12:02 pm
What he is creating is his own elite group of people. He is creating his own robot group to do as he says and is creating favorites among the teaching staffs. All education is important , not just the “FEW”. He is starting his own CLASS system just like Hitler.
Ken W.
July 22nd, 2012
8:18 pm
In modern times youth often overlook educating themselves as frequently as they should, quite frankly, because they’d rather spend their time focusing on entertainment, and when they otherwise would be learning how to be inventive, they end up opting out of the learning process to have someone elses invention do their job for them entirely. In retrospect of how far technology has come in the recent years, lets take a step back and give some deep considerations for a second. If we take the example of advanced calculators… they were created to give people an ability to finish mathematical/physical/engineering problems more efficiently, and they do a near magical job of that. However, in school, an advanced calculator is often just a means to opt out on spending time on studying, because it is designed to solve problems for you without you having to understand the methods of solving a problem.This analogy is at the essence of our current economic plight. It is a matter of automation vs. autonomy. If we truly expect to be successful with our education programs, we have to first make education more enjoyable than entertainment, secondly we have to express that autonomy leads to automation, but automation provides no guarantee of autonomy, and finally, and only then, we can effectively express to our children how the sciences allow us to build unique structures, vehicles, and communication systems, namely by using mathematics, physics and engineering to model precise shapes, precise combustion-based object acceleration, and precise signal creation/reception and pathways (as well as precise signal encryption/decryption), and that through modeling these precise factors is the only way to effectively analyze whether an invention concept is valid, to prove that all the parts will be successful at working together, and to use this modeling evidence as a means to move forward to actually begin building. If education remains second to entertainment, and second to automation, and we cannot successfully inspire as well as percieve technological inventions then our education/economic struggle will be drawn out to a long and stressful uphill battle.
BioTeach
July 23rd, 2012
2:00 pm
As a teacher of science I agree with the teachers who are not STEM teachers that all should be included. I believe the bigger issue is teaching our students critical thinking skills and requiring them to use these skills for ALL problem-solving. STEM courses are courses where lack of critical thinking skills is probably easier to identify and therefore the focus is erroneously placed on these courses.
The internet makes it too easy for students to simply “look up” what others have said or done, rather than to think through a situation. This goes along with “handing students the rope”, but students not taking the responsibility. It is just important to identify the students willing to “take the rope” and run with it to provide role models for the students who are afraid to try, don’t know how to try, or worst case, simply won’t try.