Many of you have suggested that the cash-strapped DeKalb Schools close the Fernbank Science Center.
Someone was listening.
As a longtime metro Atlanta resident, I have been to Fernbank dozens of times with all four of my children. My kids love the nature exhibits and the Apollo 6 Command Module. I would hate to see this facility close, but I realize the financial crisis facing DeKalb and understand that there will be cuts of consequence and conscience. Some good stuff will end.
According to the AJC:
Each year, about 160,000 people, many of them schoolchildren, learn about frogs, snakes, bugs and other animals and plants during visits to Fernbank Science Center.
The decades-old institution, owned and operated by the DeKalb County public school district, has offered a hands-on education to students and other visitors from across metro Atlanta and elsewhere. However, it might close, under a recommendation Thursday by the school board’s budget committee. Fernbank Science Center, which includes a planetarium, is near the Fernbank Museum of Natural History, which is operated by a separate nonprofit.
At an annual cost of $4.7 million, the building and its 56 full-time employees now are looking like a luxury to school officials. They are struggling with a $73 million deficit, and may have to cut teachers and school days to balance the budget.
School board Chairman Eugene Walker, who opposes closing the science center, said students go there to work on projects and learn about nature. “It’s a great educational opportunity for students that are interested in science,” he said.
This week, the school board adopted a tentative $759.7 million budget that closed the gap, but only with an unlikely $30 million tax increase. Several who backed the spending plan — a formality mandated by the state so the public would have something to comment on — said they had no desire to actually raise taxes. They’ll have to vote on a final budget before fiscal 2013 starts on July 1.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution polled eight of the nine board members (only Sarah Copelin-Wood could not be reached), and five said, to varying degrees, they opposed a tax increase.
“I will only consider a tax increase after we have made all the reductions we can,” said Tom Bowen, the board vice chairman. “Using reserves last year allowed us to escape some hard decisions.”
Bowen was referring to DeKalb’s savings account. Money piled up in flush times, but there are no reserves now. Indeed, this year, DeKalb may wind up $6 million in debt. If that happens, officials say they will hold off on paying bills until July or after, meaning the deficit actually could be closer to $79 million.
No other major metro Atlanta school system is in the same dire financial straits. Last year, the most recent for which figures are available, only a half-dozen public school systems in Georgia ended the year owing money.
The causes, though, are not unique: rising costs for items such as health insurance, and plummeting tax receipts. Property values, the foundation of the DeKalb tax base, will have seen a 25 percent decline from fiscal 2009 to fiscal 2013, according to school system financial officials.
Proponents of a tax increase, including Walker, note that DeKalb hasn’t raised its tax rate in nearly a decade. “The idea of just cutting to solve this problem is irresponsible,” he said.
–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog
247 comments Add your comment
teacher&mom
May 25th, 2012
8:15 am
Fernbank holds fond memories for my family. We would travel over 2 hours to spend a day at the science center.
What a shame future generations may not enjoy this treasure.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
8:17 am
Perhaps a private enterprise could take over the Science Center. I, too, grew up with yearly visits to Fernbank, but it’s a luxury this district cannot afford.
alm
May 25th, 2012
8:20 am
I loved going as a kid and my kids love it too but individual schools must come first.
Daculan
May 25th, 2012
8:30 am
I think its a shame……and yet, it had to be self supportive. 56 Employees??? Last time I went there we got a big load of attitude from a worker about walking into the garden. It was 30 minutes before closing time and she would not let us enter. I said – well, we can walk ten minutes in and ten minutes out, NO? City Worker entitled attitude. Maybe I wasn’t the only one.
Private Entity could take it over and do better. Where is Tyler Perry?
DeKalb
May 25th, 2012
8:35 am
The kids dread going there. Field trips trigger thoughts of happiness, until the kids hear it’s to Fernbank. A waste of time anf fuel for these field trips. The kids learn little that day and maintain none of it.
Maureen Downey
May 25th, 2012
8:38 am
@DeKalb, Do you mean your own kids or your students?
Maureen
yes i am worried
May 25th, 2012
8:38 am
Not a city worker — a school system worker.
This is the third time that FSC has been on the chopping block in about 5 years. Soon this blog will be full of outrage over the possible closure of the center, but not one of those people has stepped forward with any solution to the money drain that the center is to lead an effort to fix the problems.
No other system in GA has the burden of funding a FSC. Next year, my child faces the prospect of nearly 40 students in a class. How can we justify FSC?
Close
May 25th, 2012
8:39 am
Close it, we are taxed enough! Fernbank is a great place for both kids and adults, but like so many other places in Atlanta, there is no financial accountability. If Fernbank cannot support itself, then something is wrong….we would not raise taxes to support a grocery chain if they could not make money….people cannot afford housing now, they do not need to be taxed even more…sad, but close it.
Elizabeth
May 25th, 2012
8:42 am
By all means — cut something that supports academics and keep middle school sports. Then complain and sanction schools with low test scores. By all means– cut a center dedicated to getting kids excited and informed about science. Then remind everyone how schools are “failing” in science education and how far the U. S. is behind in getting people to become scientists. By all means… support something nonacademic and then complain about “failing schools”. Just another example of what the public’s and politicians’ REAL education priorities are.
Formerteacher
May 25th, 2012
8:44 am
I hate to hear about this. Shameful as it is to admit this, I went to Fernbank for the first time last year when my daughter’s class went for a field trip- and I’ve lived here almost 30 years. But, my daughter loved and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I wanted more time, since we were on a “schedule” of things to see. The presentation by the staff about the geographical areas of GA was great and the kids (well, most of them) loved touching the indigo snake. Having said all that, tough choices will have to be made,and I think Fernbank should be among them. I hope a private entity will come forward and take it on, as it is a great asset to the city.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
8:49 am
@Elizabeth, middle school sports cost the district $200,000. Fernbank costs well over $7 million dollars. There is also no data that suggests Fernbank contributes in a positive manner to the Science test scores within DCSD.
Aquagirl
May 25th, 2012
8:49 am
Just another example of what the public’s and politicians’ REAL education priorities are.
You can darn well bet the Chinese aren’t prioritizing a sport that might cause brain damage over science education. We are one screwed up country.
redweather
May 25th, 2012
8:49 am
56 full-time employees? I have visited the museum many times and am astounded it has that many full-timers on the payroll. What the heck?
yes i am worried
May 25th, 2012
8:50 am
Elizabeth,
I imagine middle school sports won’t survive, but you are talking about nearly 5 million vs 300,000 dollars. A huge difference.
In this era of emphasis on STEM, Fernbank has had years to develop support from corporations and foundations. However, this hasn’t happened. In fact, the SEMAA program ends this year because NASA is no longer funding it.
homeschooler
May 25th, 2012
8:55 am
The last time I went to Fernbank was about 8 yrs ago and I was pretty disappointed. I went on a class trip with my neice because her mom couldn’t make it. Maybe it was because I was in a large group of 3rd graders (who seemed generally clueless and couild not have cared less about being there) but I just didn’t like it. Tellus (in Cartersville) blows it away. Let a private company take it over. They will update it a bit and have it making money in no time. Then it will be a benefit to the community and not a drain on it.
Rick Day
May 25th, 2012
8:59 am
This is the educational equivalent of “eating your seed stock”. Without science, our children have no future.
I would rather pot head zombies roam the streets than to have education funding cut so a cop can get a frikkin’ raise.
DeKalb
May 25th, 2012
9:01 am
Maureen,
Both. Ive taken my kids and classes there. Neither groups wanted to return. The classes enjoyed the bus ride and picnic afterwards more than the actual Fernbank visit.
yes i am worried
May 25th, 2012
9:01 am
I want to make sure that people understand that there are two Fernbank museums. One is the big Fernbank Museum of Natural History, a large institution that is a non-profit.
The other looks a bit like an old school on the outside and that is Fernbank Science Center. This is owned by the school system. There is the Fernbank Forest also, that has been run by the FSC, but the Forest reverts back to Fernbank Inc this summer. A large amount of field trips to Fernbank are associated with the forest and that is now gone.
Progressive Humanist
May 25th, 2012
9:03 am
I’m not going to suggest that DeKalb lay off the hundreds of excess administrators that it has because I never want people to lose their jobs and it’s not good for the economy to have more people out of work. But what I will advise is that the county takes every administrator with on online or diploma mill doctorate (one that’s not from a research university), put them back in the classroom, and pay them $50-60k a year, just like the other experienced teachers with extra degrees. This would benefit students because there would be smaller class sizes, and it would save money because it would eliminate unnecessary salaries for unqualified individuals. I don’t know how far that money would go in saving Fern Bank, but it’s a start.
SalGRichardCRonnieHShuliERileyMBenjyB
May 25th, 2012
9:14 am
As a former DeKalb resident, I’d much rather my county cut luxuries than raise taxes. People are hurting & we can’t afford to pay for such luxuries. Good to see DeKalb County behaving responsibly. God willing, in the years to come, we will dig ourselves out of this mess & be able to afford facilities like Fernbank. Sad to see it go but cuts have to be made to pay for salaries, basic infrastructure, etc. I wish DeKalb had tightened their belts years ago but hey, it’s a beginning…….
Matt
May 25th, 2012
9:14 am
Fernbank Science Center is a great resource, used by kids all over the state. Why can’t it be supported by more than one county? We’re constantly hearing about how we need to get kids excited about science. This is a whole facility dedicated to doing just that! If the Science Center is cut, the whole state loses.
Also, I wish the article would point out that raising the millage rate isn’t the same thing as raising the amount taxed – falling property values have meant that people have been getting a lower tax bill, and are sending less dollars to support schools. Raising the millage rate would for most people bring their tax rate back in line to where it was just recently.
When did we decide as a community that our children’s future just wasn’t that important anymore? In DC politicians are carping all the time about the fake deficit crisis, saying think of the children. Well, think of the children, right here, right now. Will we give them the best education we can, or will we shrug our shoulders and say we’d like to give you the same opportunities the kids before you had, but we’re just too cheap.
Cigi
May 25th, 2012
9:16 am
Find a private group to take over Fernbank. Those great science teachers there could teach students in schools. I am sure that there is no data that supports the benefit that students or staff get from the program. How can we justify it at a time that teachers may be required to teach 40 students in a class? Do we get any state funds that assist us in keeping it open? If not, we cannot avoid the drain. My sister and her family live in Henry. They do not have Pre K in the schools. Each of two young students have gone to Pre K Programs run by individuals. Both of her children have been in excellent programs and have done well in school. Pre K is important but both Cobb and Henry do not offer it in the schools. DeKalb may need to follow that model.
Just a mom
May 25th, 2012
9:16 am
this headline is misleading – it is BOTH raise taxes and make dire cuts. The 2 mil increase equates to about $30 million. They still have to find about $50 million in cuts to make this budget balance. I have taken many classes to Fernbank and the kids are always so scheduled in terms of transportation that there is not much time to look at the exhibits.
Mark
May 25th, 2012
9:17 am
Dekalb- What you are saying is very one-sided. No one is taking into account the vast amount of outreach that Fernbank does with schools and communities, as well as specialty programs such as STT, Advanced Studies (enrichment for HS students), and summer and weekend enrichment camps…and oh yeah, they do offer many adult programs as well.
It’s not all about a bunch or 3rd graders going to see a planetarium show that they saw the year before. There is much more than that. Few people understand everything that FSC has to offer and what a jewel it is, and unfortunately, folks like yourself that bad-mouth it suddenly become a silent majority.
GFY
May 25th, 2012
9:18 am
If you want to look at opportunities to save money take a look at the GA Dept of Audits salary report and look at the many non teaching “administrator” positions. As a former auditor of this local BOE I am abundantly aware of many postions that are paid just to keep people on staff.
cxx
May 25th, 2012
9:22 am
Get back to basics in education, English, Math, Science, Social Studies. Study, not entertainment.
David
May 25th, 2012
9:24 am
I had good memories of going to Fernbank when I was in school. I especially loved going to the planetarium. I’d be sad to see it close.
William Casey
May 25th, 2012
9:24 am
@Progressive Humanist: your suggestion makes perfect sense unless you consider the fact that the REAL purpose of the DCSS is to provide JOBS for people with semi-bogus degrees. In this, the system has succeeded magnificently.
GFY
May 25th, 2012
9:25 am
Matt:
I decided my kids future was important enough for my family to make sacrifices in other areas (no vacations for the past 5 years, 18 year old truck and 12 year old car being driven) to send my kids to private schools. Raise the millage rate and you will see home prices decrease further as it will amount to a zero sum game.
GFY
May 25th, 2012
9:25 am
William Casey hit the nail on the head…………
outrider.jns
May 25th, 2012
9:26 am
we would not have a deficite if the leaders of this country would stop giving our tax dollars to foreign countries that hate us and want to kill us all. If our government stopped giving the money away and instead split ti between the states we could rebuild America to it’s former greatness in 3 years and the rest of the world would again stand in awe of the red, whie and blue…
stephanie m
May 25th, 2012
9:28 am
surely they can can rid of the top useless wasteful salaries at the dekalb county school system. not the teachers, they work, the people at desks doing nothing. we all know they are there.
skipper
May 25th, 2012
9:31 am
There is enough dead-weight and new “politically-correct” positions in the school system that if THEY were eliminated, the system might even be close to becoming solvent……too many NOT NEEDED administrative jobs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Howard Finkelstein
May 25th, 2012
9:33 am
You see this is what public sector Grand Poobahs do. Money falls short, because of their own colossal waste/stupidity, they penalize the public citizens instead of making the tough decision and culling their own.
DCSS, APS, Clayton County, all of them thieves, thugs and flunkys.
Mike
May 25th, 2012
9:33 am
When will the county begin to consolidate operations between the school system operations and the county’s overall operations? By this I mean, there is a transportation and maintenance capability at both the county and the school system. Should an overall county worker see a maintenance problem at a school, it has to be passed on to the school system’s maintenance department. That just seems dumb. Consolidate Now!
Lynn Hamilton
May 25th, 2012
9:36 am
Does anybody know if the attached IMAX is on the chopping block as well? Aren’t they tied to each other financially? If so, the obvious solution would be to start showing feature films at the IMAX. People will pay upwards of $20 a ticket to see Harry Potter in 3d IMAX. That could be a huge cash cow for the complex and save science education for the future.
By the way, I was inspired by many of your comments to write a petition asking the school board to aggressively seek a private company to run the center:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/824/441/392/save-fernbank-science-center/
If you agree, would you please sign it and let others know? Thank you.
bu2
May 25th, 2012
9:38 am
If they do close it, DCSS loses ownership of it by terms of the lease. They really should figure out other options to cut costs to give them some time to find some outside funding for the center. If there really is a 1 year deadline, something might happen.
Some people are saying the money could better be spent in direct science education, but the reality is that closing it reduces funds for science education as the programs outside the center will be cut back or lost and those funds are simply reducing the deficit, not being spent elsewhere.
rediculous
May 25th, 2012
9:38 am
no excuse for corrupt dekalb county schools to fall to this low.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
9:41 am
STT benefits around 200 students per semester – a very small, small percentage of DCSD students.
The enrichment programs for students should be in the schools, not in a separate facility. Why should a school district be in the business of providing summer camps and enrichment programs for adults? Do they pay for these?
Ron F.
May 25th, 2012
9:47 am
I’d think they would be able to find grant money for a science center…if anyone actually knows how to do that in DCSS. Seems they have enough administrative staff at the district office that at least ONE of them could take on the process. I’m disappointed that they weren’t already considering that with budgets as tight as they’ve been. But sadly they haven’t. I’ve taken my sons and my parents took me. There is value in having the center, and kids who say they don’t like it will remember a good bit of what they see and hear. I hate to think of it closing up.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
9:50 am
@Ron F – the process of finding grant money or selling the center to a private entity should have occurred several years ago when the economy was beginning to falter, but then again, certain individuals within DCSS led everyone to believe there was plenty of money in the bank. We know now that wasn’t the case.
Former Science Center Student
May 25th, 2012
9:52 am
I hold many fond memories of the science center, having run camps for elementary school kids there while I was in High School, as well as taking classes there in high school. I hope they figure out a better solution, even if its goes private. That place is magical, and I’ve seen so many little kids go through there with a real appreciation for science. @Dekalb, if your kids learn nothing and it’s a waste of time for them, it’s your fault for raising kids with no appreciation for learning, like many parents nowadays. I bet your kids were talking teh whole time, not paying any attention or respect to the material.
upset parent
May 25th, 2012
9:53 am
If Dekalb is in such a dire situation why do they have all those adminstrative jobs posted on their website—chief of staff—salary of $165k? Those seem like fluff in a system that is 70 million in the hole and laying off bus drivers, adding students to already overburdened classrooms and making teachers take yet another pay cut. They have also posted a director of leadership development position–maybe they need that position—it’s certainly clear that leadership is in short supply in Dekalb county!
CTPAT
May 25th, 2012
9:54 am
This seems like no-brainer. I feel fairly confident that a private entity would either take over some of the exhibits or be willing to run Fernbank. Move the seasoned science teachers into our schools. Without the forest, FSC isn’t going to be the same place to visit anyway. Fieldtrips are still available toother science resources in the area.
Justwondering
May 25th, 2012
9:55 am
Lynn Hamilton
The IMAX is not part of fernbank science center. The fernbank museum of natural history is a different facility altogether. Before you start a petition, please get your facts straight
Mrs. Murray
May 25th, 2012
9:55 am
I completely agree with Mark. There should always be outside institutions that cater to the community as a whole. That is exactly what Fernbank does. As a whole. DCSS would not be in this situation if it did decent background checks on individuals charged with finacial responsibilities. Maybe we wouldn’t have that large lawsuit that is eating away our children’s education funds.
Veronica
May 25th, 2012
9:56 am
I grew up in Dekalb Co Schools and by continuation, I grew up at Fernbank Science Center. It would be such a shame to close it. I learned a great many things there and have taken my own child many times since Gwinnett Co does not visit the Science Center. He enjoyed it/learned more than the Fernbank Museum which has all the funding and honestly, I don’t get the big museum other than a trendy place have to have Martinis and Imax.
Dekalb taxpayer
May 25th, 2012
9:59 am
Please put this decision in the proper context. If Fernbank is no longer to be funded by DCSS (and it shouldn’t be), it will not be because of the national recession and housing crisis. It will be because uneducated Dekalb voters elected self-serving, corrupt school board members who in turn hired a self-serving, corrupt superintendent who created jobs for numerous incompetent, self-serving administrators. It isn’t the economy that is causing the collapse of the school system; it is ignorance and greed—a scary combination.
Csoby
May 25th, 2012
10:06 am
We need a full accountqbility form all government on how the moeny was spent and where prior to rasing any taxes and if any improper spedning was done, then those that were in charge should be charged, fired with no benefits…not just put on leave of absence
Please don't go
May 25th, 2012
10:07 am
Money. Money. Money.
I know the place is old, dark, and musty, but I still love it! I remember as a 3rd grader going there for the first time and from that point on all I could think about was becoming an astronaut. Albeit I’m not an astronaut, I am still mesmerized by the night sky and the wonders and mysteries it holds. Field trips won’t be the same with out the Fernbank Science Center. I’ve been to the museum, but it’s just a nice marbly, shiny building – suitable for Christmas parties. I’ve eaten under the large dinosaur and it was nice, but I learned far more from the actual science center itself.
POP
May 25th, 2012
10:09 am
Waste of Money for years. Good riddance.
Veronica
May 25th, 2012
10:10 am
Btw – look to the classroom of teachers that arent up to snuff and there are plenty! Our kids are getting a DUMBED down, polictically correct education as it is, so why not close a resource for our future resources (our kids)!! Ridiculous to close a facility that has so much to offer! Kids today and their parents are mostly concerned if someone tells lil Johnny he cant have a mohawk (or a gun) or lil Susie is dressed like a Kardashian flashing her goods – that is the only time you see some of these parents. Teachers in the classroom, as we see on the news, are having relationships with their students, sexting them, sleeping on the job, cheating, bringing their own political agendas and revisionist history to the classroom and yet, they are collecting a paycheck for some that are incompetent (and there are some that are less than educated enough to teacher or even control a classroom full of kids). Start with cutting those wastes of space. We keep asking why our kids are dropping out? Why do our kids know nothing of history, civics, current events? Why cant lil Johnny figure out that if he has 30 kids by 11 baby mamas, he cant afford them making minimum wage? This is why…bc WE no longer value an educated population in this country. That will be our downfall!!
Ned
May 25th, 2012
10:11 am
I can’t help notocing that at least two patrons, “Teacher&Mom,” who traveled two hours, and Gwinnett resident “Veronica,” don’t actually appear to live in the county taxed to support this entity.
Linda
May 25th, 2012
10:12 am
Lynn Hamilton@ 9:36am – You and many others on here are thinking of Ferbank Museum of Natural History with the IMAX Theater. That is a completely separate entity that is run well by its non-profit foundation.
The Fernbank Science Center is a run-down former elementary school that is filled with dull out-of-date displays. It costs the school system millions and sees only 160k people a year. If the school system would finally let it go, a private foundation would probably sweep it up and make it a jewel of a science center along the lines of the museum.
A Conservative Voice
May 25th, 2012
10:19 am
Instead of closing “Fernbank”, fire all the “Idiots” in the system. Be ’bout even money wise…….
Carol Napier
May 25th, 2012
10:25 am
I would gladly pay increased taxes to keep Fernbank Science Center open. My daughter, who wants to be an astronaut, has taken many high school courses through Fernbank. We first learned about the STT program at Fernbank from a older kid in our neighborhood. That kid went on to get an aeronautics engineering degree from GATech, a masters from MIT, and now is working on designing the next generation of space vehicles. The WORLD needs Fernbank. Don’t close it!
Patricia
May 25th, 2012
10:26 am
I personally think that they should NOT raise our taxes in DeKalb County! Taxes are way too high now. They JUST raised it last year and 9 years in a row since I purchased my home in DeKalb County! They need to cut the new superintendent’s pay in half. She is NOT a good person for the school system. As a tax paying citizen, I do not appreciate the fact that DeKalb County Schools are constantly defending her, but it has been proven that she is NOT the right person for a job like that. The school system she came from is doing worse since she has been there. She has brought it down. At the same time her pocket is getting fatter. Cut her salary..in fact just put an interim there and get rid of her all together. I want to have the right to vote for a new Superintendant…
NONPC
May 25th, 2012
10:36 am
Fernbank is a great place for school aged children. I had not realized that it was funded by Dekalb schools.
Even with all of its benefits to all of metro Atlanta, Dekalb has a priority responsibility to the students and taxpayers in Dekalb. Sentiments for FSC aside, it is unconscionable to fund FSC when the Dekalb School Budget is in such dire straits.
FSC is a metro-wide resource. Hopefully, someone will step forward to turn it into a non-profit institution… solicit corporate and private donations to establish an endowment, and charge fees appropriate for keeping the center running.
dcss failing
May 25th, 2012
10:37 am
As Mark, a previous poster pointed out, Fernbank is about much more than field trips for 3rd graders. STT and Advanced Studies absolutely changed both my kids lives. Those programs were directly responsible for their interest in science. My daughter is about to enter a very prestigious PHd program and my son is planning to study physics in college. Without STT and Advanced Studies, I have NO doubt, they would not be where they are today. There are 2 astronauts from Dekalb County schools that both participated in STT and both attribute that program to kindling their interest in science that led them to where they are today. Yes, I realize that not everyone can particpate in those programs. Why bring everyone down the the same level, rather than trying to raise up those we can? Make parents responsible for transportation if they want their kids to participate. That will save a lot of money, time, and gas. There is SO much waste in DCSD, legal fees, etc. etc. It is disgusting!!!
Brewmaster
May 25th, 2012
10:38 am
Just another example of a bloated government beaurocracy bankrupting an otherwise fine institution. Same thing they did with Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Solyndra. The list is too large to print. Now they will probably let the building just sit there and deteriorate instead of selling it and the land to some “evil” capitalist. The land alone is probalbly worth $70,000,000. How many vacant school buildings could Dekalb County sell and get back in the black ?
Justwondering
May 25th, 2012
10:40 am
Carol
The article is misleading. We need to cut 73 mllion dollars. The maximum tax icrease would only raise 3O million. We need Huge cuts.
Brewmaster
May 25th, 2012
10:42 am
These 56 employees will be re-depolyed to administer Obamacare in the same efficient manner.
Former Student
May 25th, 2012
10:43 am
I’m a former Dekalb student. I have a close friend whose father is one of those 56 employees. I’ve also been through their Scientific Tools and Techniques (STT) program in high school along with multiple elective after-school classes. I owe an extraordinary amount to the dedication of that facilities staff. I’ve never met a group of teachers so focused and encouraging of their students anywhere else (including college). Their staff goes beyond what is expected of any other teacher. They work nights and weekends continually to work with their students. I can proudly say that I would not be in the field of study (IT) I am in today without their help and dedication. It would be a shame to let these teachers and their workspace go.
erin
May 25th, 2012
10:46 am
I went to DeKalb County Schools in the 1980s/90s and remember many, many, many field trips to the Fernbank Science Center. I always loved it. My mom would take me to the planetarium on trips to the center outside of school as well. And I always loved the planetarium shows.
Now, the thing is, I went one day in 2009 on a trip back to Georgia … it was NOT the same! So many exhibits I knew and loved gone … the dinosaurs in the front entrance, the geologic formations and rocks and things to the right.
I can’t imagine kids don’t still enjoy the center and can learn a LOT by going there, but it’s not the same. In fact, the very day I was there, a field trip of kids from a DeKalb County elementary school were going through the museum and they all seemed just as entranced by the place as I and my classmates always were.
Having said all of that, I really, really hope a private entity can take on the running of the center. It’d be a truly awful loss for DeKalb County schoolchildren for the center to close.
Brewmaster
May 25th, 2012
10:48 am
Former Student, I aplogize for my comment about the empolyees, if they are truly that dedicated. The beaurocracy behind them was probably the problem, the same way teachers unions use over half of the education budgets intended for local schools.
Concerned mom
May 25th, 2012
10:59 am
Fernbank serves a much more important purpose than field trips. It provides high-quality science instruction for high school students, including AP courses and science classes that relate to potential careers, such as animal science, forensic science and food science. Our high schools can’t afford to offer these classes on their own. We need students who are better trained in science and dismantling Fernbank will take us backward.
Cliff Claven
May 25th, 2012
11:03 am
Can it not be absorbed by the non-profit group running the Natural History Museum?
Razorburn
May 25th, 2012
11:06 am
@ Justwondering..
You are a mean, bitter person. Chill out. Anyway, I am off to the beach. Care to join? Or would you rather read comments and belittle folks.
James
May 25th, 2012
11:08 am
I’m a Fulton county resident, our system doesn’t have such luxurious facilities such as Fernbank. Let me take a stab at saving all of the whining on both sides. First what is the real value of the center to the educational system. Are students test scores in Science boasted by trips to the center? If not, then the value is being over stated. If so, then there is one reason to save the place.
1) 56 employees? Seven in Administration? All that’s needed: Director and Secretary/bookeeper. Nine in Instructional Media? Cut to a Designer and 2 Techs. 28 INSTRUCTORS??? Assign them to schools. Need only Two Physical Scientist and Two Life Scientist (teamwork people, science teachers should teach during visit and not watch). Four in Reception? One needed. One in Media Center? That’s all. Three in Security – Contractor it out at significant savings. Six in Grounds – I know DCSS has Grounds folks in the system use them. Four Custodians – need two
There’s 15 full-time folks. The savings is about $2.7 million. The cost is now $2 for admission and $5 for Planetarium FOR EVERYONE INCLUDING SENIOR (especially SENIORS) and raise another $300k in admissions
If not shut it down or see if Fernbank Museum, Bernie Marcus, Ohthur Blank, Tyler Perry or some other entity wants it. Holler.
yuzeyurbrane
May 25th, 2012
11:10 am
It’s time to put your money where your mouth is, as they say in poker. I live in DeKalb and my kids are grown. Therefore, I get little direct benefit from the school taxes I still pay; however, one of them being the Fernbank Science Center and Planetarium which is open to the general public. Direct benefit aside, we all have a duty as citizens to provide for the common good and to provide for an educated populace. It is time to say that yes we will sacrifice for the next generation by providing a quality public education so all can grow to the best of their abilities. Private entities have their place but as we will soon learn from the Fernbank Museum’s takeover of Fernbank Forest, it all comes at a price that many in the general population simply cannot afford.
edugator
May 25th, 2012
11:11 am
There is much good in DeKalb, including Fernbank, some of the Magnets, and most of the teachers. If we lose them now, we’ll never get them back. Look elsewhere- the salaries of folks in non-teaching, non-school based positions should be one target. That anyone involved with public education makes a 6 figure salary is absurd, except for the super and a handful of other folks with real responsiblities.
Head in the Sand
May 25th, 2012
11:13 am
Brewmaster, everything is not Obama’s fault. I know it must feel “right” for an obvious party-liner to place all blame on one party, but the truth is that it is not reality and is much more complicated than that. Much like the federal deficit problem, we cannot cut our way out of this. Taxes must be raised as part of RESPONSIBLE cutting, even if only in small increments over time. Having said that, I do plan to vote no on TSPLOST, but not because it’s a tax…for a myriad of other reasons. As for Fernbank…I have no problem handing over the reigns to a private company, but that should be worked out as part of the deal to let it slip out of DeKalb’s budget, and possibly saving the employees’ jobs as well.
Dekalb taxpayer
May 25th, 2012
11:14 am
Matt, I don’t know why, but my Dekalb home has decreased in value by about $80,000 and the tax assessment has decreased by about $40,000 and my property taxes haven’t decreased one penny. If the tax rate is increased, I will be paying MORE than ever before.
john
May 25th, 2012
11:16 am
Put a toll on it like the lexus lanes in gwinnett. That way only the privalleged and wealthy can go and the STRA can make more interest!
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
11:17 am
Here is an assignment for those who believe that the school district should continue paying for Fernbank because we need actual data and facts behind your assertions:
1. Number of students who visit the Science Center per year and what activities do those visits entail.
2. How many students participate in the STT per year along with the costs of providing STT.
3. Provide a correlation between the Fernbank offerings and Science scores in DCSD.
4. Provide the number of students that take AP offerings at Fernbank.
5. Provide the number of students that actually utilize the additional offerings at Fernbank.
6. Provide the schedule and lessons plans of the teachers that suppposedly visit the schools in DCSD.
7. Provide the actual itinerary, including school and classrooms that each Fernbank employee visits per school year.
Thank you, I’ll be waiting.
Freidenker
May 25th, 2012
11:18 am
Teach the science, tax the churches. Churches are like Waffle Houses, two on every corner. I don’t need to hear about their benevolence, yes some do great things, but as organizations they need to help the bigger poor, our country. Time WILL come my praying friends.
James
May 25th, 2012
11:20 am
@Dunwoody Mom good post
enough already
May 25th, 2012
11:21 am
Perhaps the 400 some odd brother in laws, sisters, nieces, uncles and cousins that all have jobs at the county office could be (gasp) fired? It has only been the recommendation of two audits (that are tax dollar funded but our elected leaders decided were inconvenient to follow through on). The administrative growth has outpaced county population growth by over 1000% the last thirty years. Any private entity this top heavy would have been restructured years ago. My mother has been a DeKalb teacher for years and it is appalling to hear of the state of her school. Blatant prejudice against Caucasian employees throughout the hierarchy, disrespectful and unruly students, thug and gang parents that have the audacity to yell at an educator when they report their child’s misbehavior. DeKalb can’t wait to follow in Clayton’s footsteps (sooner or later you drive affluent residents out and run dry of other peoples money). The idiots and “doctors” in the county office are the most uneducated, impractical group of buffoons in the state. Why does a high school need four assistant principals? One is practical and furthermore these are high paying jobs. Unfortunately, DeKalb’s populace is more interested in keeping their political machine in motion than actually improving their community. Also, the spending priorities could not be more backwards. Why do we need a security camera on every school bus? Why do we get new buses every three years? (they used to be ancient) Whose idea was it to put a land-line telephone in every class room five years ago? A field trip for teachers to see their buffoon CEO sings “He’s got the Whole World in His Hands” in a stadium. You can’t make this stuff up. A curriculum that prioritizes “diversity” over math, science and proper English. Putting handicap students in all of the general classes so they can slow down the other students.
DeKalb should start firing at the top. Sell its underutilized and unused facilities. Suspend ALL capital improvements to buildings and structures, freeze teacher pay, sell Fernbank or seek a private partner, not purchase any new vehicles, and furlough administrative office workers. A leader with relevant BUSINESS experience could balance the budget in a very short time frame while keeping class sizes where they are or smaller.
funny
May 25th, 2012
11:34 am
Close it. It is worthless. Many times schools bring in the Atlanta Zoo to talk about animals and science. Fernbank is a waste when you have snobbish employees who fail to understand that the science center’s purpose is to assist with developing young science minds. Weekly trips for Fernbank ES? How did those weekly trips help DCSD? They did not, only a select group.
Glad SEMAA is gone., It was impossible to get your children in because space was wasted by the “friends and family” plan- holding for a select few.
Sell it to Tellus to be its Atlanta campus. Tellus is magnificent. I love transportation day! My teens love going to Tellus, even if we have to drive over an hour. Lesson is taht if you give a great product people will come.
For the school system to have a reserach and grant department that did not bring in grants, but monitored what hard workding teachers submitted. Retool that department to mandate that every employee in that department is required to bring in at least 4 grants annually or lose your job!
Patrick Edmondson
May 25th, 2012
11:42 am
As a retired Dekalb Co teacher of the Gifted I can tell you without the Science Center there is nothing to stimulate the wonder and amazement that sparks an interest in science. Below Middle School facilities, supplies, and trained personnel are mostly absent for inquiry science.
The bad thing is WHEN the school board closes Fernbank Center, the land reverts to the museum where developer board members plan to open Fernbank Forest off Clifton to build upscale golfing condos. The added traffic and loss of cooling, aerating trees will greatly lower the quality of life all around the area. The fix is in according to personnel who have been threatened with economic revenge if they speak.
Sam
May 25th, 2012
11:52 am
What a tragedy! Who’s going to take up the responsibility now for indoctrinating school kids in the latest evolutionary fantasies? Oh, right, there’s always the public school system. Tax money well spent.
Nick
May 25th, 2012
11:56 am
Thats a shame, maybe if these ignorant representatives would stop flooding their own pockets with money, our cities and counties wouldn’t be completely broke. Seems like every day we here crap like this. We the people of this country need to stop just accepting this type of crap from our government and stand up and say enough is enough.
Ron F.
May 25th, 2012
11:57 am
Dunwoody Mom: They were busy using reserve funds and everyting else to keep up appearances. It’s sad to see the collateral damage now. They’ve made it hard for all of us in public education to have a good reputation. Guess I better get the kids up there soon before they shutter the place for good.
edugator
May 25th, 2012
12:02 pm
Dunwoody Mom- always the cost of something, never the value. Close Fernbank and we’ll never see its like again. The savings will be plunged into some scripted bit of nonsense curriculum or the depths of MIS.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
12:09 pm
In this case the cost is the value. This school district is in dire financial straits – we have to quit thinking emotionally, but fiscally. Until someone can provide proof, datawise, that Fernbank is worth the money that is pumped into year after year, I have no problem with it being closed.
dubious
May 25th, 2012
12:11 pm
We don’t need to keep Fernbank open to continue the STT program running. Why can’t that be housed in one of the high schools that has excess capacity? The same teachers could teach, but not in a stand alone facility with all the costs that go along.
catlady
May 25th, 2012
12:24 pm
First, get rid of 2/3 of the CO staff (and not by moving them to the individual school budget). Then, look carefully at the third that are left and cut all those with “questionable” degrees. THEN, consolidate job descriptions so that 1/2 of the remaining are gone. THEN, we will look at other savings. There is NO GOOD REASON to have so many non-teaching staff!
Athletics
May 25th, 2012
12:36 pm
Elizabeth…To your response about cutting Middle School Sports in DeKalb….Here is a news flash about this suggestion from someone inside…Middle School Athletics’ in DeKalb believe it or not, operates in the “black” meaning just from ticket sales alone funds all transportation, coaching, officiating and uniforms/equipment needs. There is a surplus at the end of the year that assists funding non-ticket sports in the high schools. So in retrospect, if you cut Middle School sports in DeKalb, you would be in a bigger deficit. Crazy isn’t it? Not many on the outside know this. If you want to cut sports, you must cut sports in the high schools that do not charge for entry to the events and these sports drain the budget. 4 item lines keep sports operating in the county…Middle School Athletics… High School Football…High School boy’s and girl’s Basketball. The rest of the sports deplete the revenues of these 4 items. So the answer is, if you do not want to cut sports, then charge entry fees, or go to a pay to play system for those sports that do not charge entry fees. Many schools do this in times of desperation. The clear answer is to follow the recommendations of the auditor that we paid so much for. Cut the areas of excess and stop trying to justify those positions.
Teacher
May 25th, 2012
12:44 pm
Fernbank brings the Starlab portable planetarium to many schools every year. Fernbank is also vital to the Science Olympiad programs and Lego Robotics teams. I guess these things also have no value or not enough value. Better to put our money toward legal fees, scripted lessons and paper pushers. When this is all said and done, Dekalb will have run off everyone who can afford to move or send their children to private schools. The “equity” we will be left with will be below our current level of mediocrity.
yes i am worried
May 25th, 2012
12:45 pm
Patrick Edmondson
The garden is already gone. That is a done deal.
How do other system’s that don’t have FSC (not even close) have such better outcomes for far more students, of all races, economic levels, etc in science than DeKalb does?
I think that is a valid question.
How far this county has fallen
May 25th, 2012
12:52 pm
New motto: DeKalb, the NEW Clayton County
Tax the rich!
May 25th, 2012
12:54 pm
Yeah! That’s the ticket! Big Government will save DeKalb!
Donaldo
May 25th, 2012
12:55 pm
Public-private partnerships are one solution, along with small tax increase, and employee & program cuts. How about offering a major company the naming rights to Fernbank in return for a fee, eg. Coca Cola/Fernbank Science Center, staffed by a few paid mgrs. and a force of volunteers and students seeking math/science degrees, partner with GA. TECH, UGA, GA. ST to staff with interns. Ask all teachers who want to continue employed to volunteer a small pay cut + small increase in class size, in return, we get Schools of Education to offer interns to help. We go to major corporations to sponsor schools, in return, students are mentored by company volunteers as a partnership, these are just a few ideas, I am sure with some thought we can come up with many more, the main idea is that we have to change our education model…….rethink our systems….and if necessary relieve the burdens put on by teacher unions…..We need major sweeping innovation, not bandaids which eventually will result in more of the same……..Think about it!!!
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
12:57 pm
@Teacher, how many schools see the Starlab? Please name them and the number of students involved. Science Olympiad and Robotics teams can be housed in every school, as they are in several currently or have teams within attendance clusters, there is no need for a separate facility for this.
wut?
May 25th, 2012
1:01 pm
WoW—I thought for sure EVERYTHING in the Dekalb School System would be soooo much better when they renamed all the schools!
Concerned Student
May 25th, 2012
1:06 pm
I am extremely disappointed in the county for even considering to close Fernbank Science Center. Over my years in the DeKalb County school system, I took full advantage of Fernbank Science Center in field trips and SEMAA camp. While school teachers handed out countless worksheets and busy work, Fernbank offered hands-on activities that inspired me and sparked my interest in science. Now, at high school, a high percentage of the gifted students choose STT and Advanced Studies classes over the basic science courses. Every student I’ve talked to offers high praise of Fernbank, and I have even signed up for an Advanced Studies course next year.
Cutting Fernbank Science center will take away a wonderful learning opportunity from me and thousands of fellow DeKalb County school students. I understand that DeKalb County is under a severe budget deficit, but Fernbank is a neighborhood institution that offers programs one cannot find elsewhere. When valuable institutions like Fernbank are cut, people cannot complain about the United State’s sinking education quality and the loss of access to quality science and math education.
Jackie
May 25th, 2012
1:09 pm
@Dekalb taxpayer – I agree with your comment 100%! A tax increase will more than likely drive more people out of their homes because they are struggling as it is. Once more people lose their home the taxes will decrease even more. How does this help? On top of that if the TSPLOST passes (hopefully it won’t be), Dekalb and Fulton residents will be paying 2 cents and everyone else will pay 1 cent! DCSS should start the cuts at home – in their main office.
As I was saying before being censored ....
May 25th, 2012
1:13 pm
(Re: Maureen’s prior topic, Private School Tax Credits)
Maureen, no one is getting away without paying taxes. It’s a TAX CREDIT, which allows the income earner to direct a portion of the school taxes paid—to the school where his/her child’s education is actually occurring. In other words, it operates just as do other tax credits you personally favor.
Unlike an AJC subscriber, who can cancel their subscription upon determining your publisher’s claims of “balance” are a scam—taxpayers don’t actually escape paying.
If you’ll forgive me borrowing your petty tone—it’s funny that the 17-year-olds you cite would no doubt understand all that, but you don’t. Could it be the biased way in which you set up the premise?
Now try “explaining” to them the Earned Income Tax Credit.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
1:18 pm
The latest Facility Assessment report indicates that FSC also needs about $1.6 million in repairs.
http://www.dekalb.k12.ga.us/www/documents/vision-2020/facility-report-fernbankScienceCenter-(2011-09-13).pdf
Also interesting, how does one operate a computer lab in this day and age with no wireless connectivity?
Technology Readiness->Electrical Power
Less than half of the instructional spaces have sufficient electrical power requirements and outlets for the minimum number of computers.
Technology Readiness->Cooling The rooms do not have adequate year-round cooling and ventilation.
Technology Readiness->Drops Almost all instructional spaces have only one drop.
Technology Readiness->Wireless The majority of the main building has wireless capability, but the computer lab does not. The annex building does not have wireless capability.
Technology Readiness->LAN-WAN Performance Internet connectivity is available, but it is very slow for the needs of the school and its program.
Ned
May 25th, 2012
1:21 pm
Is there some reason this has to be an “all or nothing” discussion? Atlanta Public Broadcasting is run by APS but relies heavily on other funding sources . . .
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
1:22 pm
One of budget recommendations is to do away with transporation for STT students. How many students will take part in this if they have no transportation to Fernbank?
yes i am worried
May 25th, 2012
1:25 pm
And keep in mind all those advanced high school science courses require students to transport themselves. Accessibility is really limited.
Inman Park Boy
May 25th, 2012
1:33 pm
Fernbank (bless it’s heart) dates back to a time in DeKalb County when the school system reached for the stars and had the money to do just that. Let’s not forget that Perimeter College first opened as DeKalb College and was operated by the DeKalb School system. That was then, this is now. The population in DeKalb has largely (not completely) shifted from white middle and upper middle class communities to white middle and lower middle class and minority communities. The entire southside of DeKalb has probably suffered more of a decline in property values than any other part of the metro area. So, we are dealing with a system not necessarily in a quality decline but simply in a money decline. I am not sure what the soluition to that may be other than to cut out such lovely old programs as Fernbank. It breaks my heart, but it is a fact of our current economy and DeKalb demographics.
Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
1:44 pm
First too many making comments do not know the difference between Fernbank Science Center and Fernbank Natural History Center. These are two separate entities.
Tax payers of DeKalb, need to really start paying attention. We are in this financial hole, because we as a county have enabled our elected officials to spend millions upon millions on law suits, schools that serve few at the expense of the neighborhood schools, and paying for employees that truly are not needed. If you ran a business the way DeKalb County and the schools are run, you’d be bankrupt and out of business.
First, ALL employees need to be looked at. Only necessary employees should be kept, and the rest need to be laid off. We are not an employment agency and cannot afford to keep people employed for the sake of employing them.
Enlarging class size will take even more away from the children of DeKalb’s education. This should only happen, if all cuts have been made to personnel.
Increasing taxes will further hurt our home values. Already, people can’t give their homes away. If home values fall even more, there is a limit to the amount of taxes that can be assessed to people. What happens when we hit that limit and we are still in need of money to cover the bills?
Not only should Fernbank Science close, but so should every magnet, theme, and other special school and program (including pre-K) until we have finances controlled and are providing a quality education in every home school. As a county we can no longer allow, a few lucky to receive a good education, at the expense of the majority struggling in overcrowded classes to try to get some kind of education that doesn’t equate to half of what the few lucky are receiving.
Mountain Man
May 25th, 2012
1:50 pm
It is funny that one of the reasons for Dekalb’s shortfall is declining property values. In other words, a person’s house may go from $300,000 value to $150,000 so they pay half the tax they used to. Then they look to increase property taxes 2 mils, which might increase their tax by 10% (over the cut amount) and people are going nuts being against “increased taxes”. Their taxes are 40% lower but they think it is a tax increase.
REminds me of what happened to me in Cherokee County in the late 80″s early 90’s. The State had mandated that properties be reassessed. When the new assessments came out everyone was up in arms because their taxes went up. But the County Commissioners said, just wait, don’t file an appeal, we will adjust the millage rate so there is no net increase in taxes. After the time period expired for appeals, the County then announced that their finances were in worse shape than they thought, and they would not be able to roll back the millage rate. But when election time rolled around, every single commissioner campaigned on the premise that “they never voted for a single tax increase”. All good Republicans, of course.
Mountain Man
May 25th, 2012
1:56 pm
A lot has been said about the average cost of educating a student in the metro area being around $11,000 and that teachers are the big reason. The way I figure it, let us say that the teacher’s salary and benefits work out to be $100,000 per year. Each teacher teaches an average of 35 students in a classroom. That makes the average teacher cost a little less than $3000 per student per year. So where does the other $8000 come in? Administrators, transportaion (buses), administration, special ed students, administration, etc.
TrishaDishaWarEagle
May 25th, 2012
1:59 pm
In 8th grade a threw a quarter into an opening on the Apollo capsule for good luck during a field trip in december the last day before christmas break that year. If you sell off the assets, I want my quarter back.
TrishaDishaWarEagle
May 25th, 2012
2:16 pm
@Teacher Reader…instead of “few lucky” you should be saying “The few gifted”..intelligence is not luck, and all students are not equal. Some are clearly superior to others in intellect and they should be treated special as they are the most likely to succeed. Egalitarianism has no place in education, otherwise you wind up with smart children suffering as their pace is slowed by the slow pace of the majority who can’t keep pace with them.
yes i am worried
May 25th, 2012
2:16 pm
Mountain Man
I live in a part of DeKalb which hasn’t seen such huge value drops and my home is worth only slightly less than its appraised value. I have yet to appeal, because the difference is small, but if DCSS raises the millage rate, you better believe that will be an incentive to appeal — along with all my neighbors. Parts of Central and N. DeKalb never had the huge drop that S. DeKalb did. Most areas have had maybe a 20 percent drop….
TrishaDishaWarEagle
May 25th, 2012
2:17 pm
I just set a record for usage of the word “pace”
Deborah
May 25th, 2012
2:21 pm
It saddens me that many people are obviously uninformed about what Fernbank Science Center provides our students, teachers and community. Do you realize that, in addition to teaching at the Center, the Fernbank instructors teach in the schools every day? They also teach evenings and weekends.
Many students come after school hours, to take rigorous classes that are not available at their schools. As a result of these experiences, they become involved in internships and receive college scholarships that would not have been available otherwise? Some of them, not originally college bound, actually decide to attend college as a result of taking some of the Fernbank classes. Older students become mentors for younger ones through programs such as Science Olympiad, First LEGO League Robotics, Chemistry Days and Science Night Out.
Fernbank students have gone on to become teachers, doctors, scientists, pilots, engineers and even astronauts as a direct result of their experiences at the science center. How do you measure that in dollars? Students who are inspired to pursue STEM careers are likely to earn in excess of $100K per year soon after graduating from college.
When our nation is actively promoting STEM, why would DeKalb eliminate its academic jewel that rivals any program offered by any school system in the country? If Fernbank closes its doors, they will not be reopened. Where will the public school students go for these opportunities?
Those who have lived in DeKalb and surrounding counties for a long time know the reputation of our district. Would closing Fernbank Science Center enhance science education for our students? Will our schools be more attractive to potential new residents? If your children have not yet experienced the special programs and courses at Fernbank, I hope they do not lose that opportunity forever.
BlahBlahBlah
May 25th, 2012
2:23 pm
$4.7 million divided by 160,000 patrons = about $29 per visitor. No way this is a viable private endeavor.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
2:38 pm
When our nation is actively promoting STEM, why would DeKalb eliminate its academic jewel that rivals any program offered by any school system in the country
As has been pointed out, other school systems have higher science scores and do not have a FSC.
Would closing Fernbank Science Center enhance science education for our students
Looking at science test scores, it hasn’t so far.
Will our schools be more attractive to potential new residents?
What does this have to do with Fernbank? No one would pick a school in DCSD based on what is available at Fernbank.
Fernbank students have gone on to become teachers, doctors, scientists, pilots, engineers and even astronauts as a direct result of their experiences at the science center.
Students at all DCSD schools have gone on to become teachers, doctors, scientist, etc. – you do not need a Fernbank to accomplish this.
yes i am worried
May 25th, 2012
2:46 pm
TrishaDishaWarEagle
No it is luck in DeKalb — 90 students a semester get into STT — the ones who don’t generally have the same qualifications as those who to.
The high achiever magnet programs are worse — simple cutoff of scores and then a lottery — plenty of 80th percentile kids who get in and plenty of 99th percentile who don’t.
Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
2:53 pm
@ Trisha It’s luck, not every child in the magnet, theme and other programs that are expensive to run are gifted. They are lucky to have had their names pulled for the lottery. There are many kids whose names were pulled who are at their home schools.
We cannot afford these programs and they need to go. I want EVERY child in DeKalb to receive a quality education, and not just those in these special programs.
Concerned mom
May 25th, 2012
3:02 pm
Questions for Dunwoody Mom: Do you actually equate test scores with quality education? What would that be, passing rates on end of course tests? CRCT? So any program that can’t demonstrate a direct correlation with a few points increase on a particular test should be scrapped? Is there no value to providing enrichment for motivated students? Maybe we have more demand than supply of these special programs. It’s pretty curious to kill all special programs because there aren’t enough for everyone who wants them. Instead, we would be better served to expand offerings and find other places to cut. (For example, how much do we spend on a tv channel to broadcast School Board meetings? How does that boost our test scores?)
BlahBlahBlah
May 25th, 2012
3:04 pm
I’m so thankful we have the ability to homeschool our kids.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
3:13 pm
Questions for Dunwoody Mom: Do you actually equate test scores with quality education
Well, yes, since the biggest portion of a child’s grade is test results. What does EOCT and CRCT have to do with this?
Is there no value to providing enrichment for motivated students
Sure, but these offerings should be provided to ALL students, not just a lucky few.
I'd rahter not say
May 25th, 2012
3:13 pm
@Patrick Edmonson,
The science center sits on only 6+/- acres. The “old growth forest” you talk about is not owned by the DCSD. DCSD has a lease that ends at the end of June and will not be renewed.
Whether the science center stays open or not… the forest is history.
yes i am worried
May 25th, 2012
3:16 pm
Concerned Mom
We can’t afford these programs. We could cut the entire central office staff (and we probably should) and we still can’t afford these programs. Do you realize that some of these programs are costing thousands above and beyond what is spent on other children? How is right? It may have worked when money was flowing freely but not now.
Also, Fernbank was advised to expand their programs (STT, in particular) 6 years ago. They never did. There has been a certain level of arrogance surrounding the center and making changes. Shame really.
Eliminate Nanny Governments
May 25th, 2012
3:21 pm
How much do the panacea SEX OFFENDER Registries cost? That much money alone, every single year, would easily pay for Fernbank.
Further, if the SEX OFFENDER Registries are actually useful and wonderful, then there are zero excuses for not having many more Registries. In fact, many other types of Registries make much more sense than SEX OFFENDER Registries do. We “need” more Registries and they will cost plenty more.
It is way past time to acknowledge reality regarding the Registries and for people to stand up and say that the emperor has no clothes. It is way past time to tell the nanny big governments that we do not believe their propaganda campaigns about “protecting children”.
The Registries, and especially the adjunct idiotic laws that they have enabled and cultivated (e.g. Banishment), are unnecessarily and negligibly beneficial. The minor benefits that we receive from them are easily obtainable by means that we all ought to be doing anyway. That is, if we actually are trying to “protect children” as the Registries lie.
That would not be so bad except that the Registries and the adjunct laws cost a fortune. Additionally, experts do not support the witch hunt and testify that it is counterproductive. And it is. The witch hunt is also immoral, un-American, anti-factual, anti-religious, often idiotic, and often illegal.
Unamericans who support these big nanny governments who love the SEX OFFENDER Registries need to step up and pay. We are tired of carrying you. We are tired of education, public facilities, transportation, etc. suffering because of the cost of your witch hunt.
Jeff
May 25th, 2012
3:31 pm
Show me a public accounting of the lottery “windfall” and the original education budget, then we can talk.
Pardon My Blog
May 25th, 2012
3:32 pm
I think Fernbank is a gem that should not be closed; however, it should not be a jobs program for friends and family. DCSS should NOT be paying for Montessori schools. No questions those should go.
Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
3:44 pm
@ Pardon My Blog, DCSS cannot afford Montessori, Theme, DECA, DCA, and the magnet programs. ALL of these programs need to be stopped immediately and the children sent back to their home schools. All of these programs cost the tax payer more per student to run.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
3:44 pm
I guess I’m still confused as to how Fernbank can be called “gem”, when so few students are really affected by its presence.
GwinnettParenttz
May 25th, 2012
3:46 pm
@Censored. Hmmm. Duly noted.
Concerned DeKalb Mom
May 25th, 2012
3:49 pm
“How do other system’s that don’t have FSC (not even close) have such better outcomes for far more students, of all races, economic levels, etc in science than DeKalb does?”
I think this is the most telling question throughout this thread. Data-driven, emotion removed. Is it worth it for ALL of our students–and used by ALL schools?
I too experienced the Fernbank of the late 70’s and early 80’s. I loved it–I have a specific memory of being introduced to skunk cabbage in the forest. I hate to see it go.
But clearly, the center is not serving the county. My children have been in elementary school for 4 years collectively; they’ve never been to the forest. They have only seen the planetarium, and it has been the same program each year. It makes me sad that my children aren’t being given the same FSC experience that I had–but it’s clear that closing the center is not the cause. The experience changed. And yes, my children are behaved and highly motivated…so whoever did it before, don’t start accusing another mom of not parenting their children adequately enough to visit.
I love the idea of Tellus-Atlanta. Hopefully someone can reach out and move that idea towards reality.
RexDogma
May 25th, 2012
3:50 pm
I have seen DeKalb County do a lot of stupid things over the years. As a person educated in their system this would be an outright tragedy. Come on folks a 2 mill increase would do nothing to kill your budget. N. Dekalb needs to stop their whining and pay up.
Truth in Moderation
May 25th, 2012
3:55 pm
The solution is easy. Do what the rich do..FOUNDATIONIZE it. Turn the center into a Foundation that could receive money from Parks and Rec, Fernbank Natural History Museum, and Jamie Dimon could drop a cool $4.7 million into George Soros’ TIDES FOUNDATION so it could make its way to Fernbank (wink, wink). That way, the IRS can take a tax hit.
This isn’t rocket science. Gwinnett figured this out several years ago with its Gwinnett Environmental and Heritage Center.
Eric
May 25th, 2012
4:05 pm
I may be wrong, but if the Dekalb would quit funding new electronic speed devices, cameras, and all the other technology that will soon be obsolete; all the paved sidewalks and curbs that clutter the landscape; there might be funds for Fernbank.
Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
4:06 pm
I am hoping that those referring to Fernbank Science as being a “gem” are referring to the Natural History Museum, which is going no where. The Fernbank Science center is outdated and has little to offer in the way of exhibits. It’s mostly classrooms.
bootney farnsworth
May 25th, 2012
4:07 pm
Inman Park hit it directly on the head.
FSC dates back to a time when DeKalb was a white, affluent community with the resources to attempt great things. those days have passed.
DeKalb is now a much less affluent community run by a pack of crooks. it doesn’t have the resources to keep itself open, much less to run FCS
bootney farnsworth
May 25th, 2012
4:08 pm
@ rex,
what part of DeKalb do you live in?
Jan
May 25th, 2012
4:09 pm
Stop the nostalgia about how wonderful Fernbank Science Center was. It isn’t a temple, shrine, or holy place. We can no longer afford it! Shut it down! Put that money into something useful for the every day education of children.
Eric
May 25th, 2012
4:11 pm
@Mountain Man (1:56) Please check your salary info. I’m not aware of teacher pay anywhere close to 100k (even with benefits)! New teachers with a B.S. start around $35-37k or thereabouts. When you count “benefits,” be sure to subtract all the payroll deductions made to pay for those benefits. Hence, not much of a benefit.
bootney farnsworth
May 25th, 2012
4:11 pm
something else working against FSC. its outdated.
while I’m not a big fan of teaching with too much technology, today’s kids require a much more engaged approach to, well, everything, than FSC offers. it takes much more money to upgrade
than it DCSS offers
bootney farnsworth
May 25th, 2012
4:17 pm
something else which needs to be said…
DeKalb back in the day was managed by a competent good old boys network who were smart enough not to kill the goose laying the golden egg.
today DeKalb is managed by an incompetent good old boyz network who have proven unwilling or unable to restrain themselves. they killed the goose, cooked it, ate it, and then complained somebody hasn’t given them a new goose
Donaldo
May 25th, 2012
4:18 pm
All of the comments while appreciated are simply that, comments. If the group on this blog truly want action, let me suggest you all meet up at a convenient location to present actual solutions, the time for opinions is way past. This is a time for action, and for me, I believe things when I see them vs what I hear. Organize, solicit community action groups to support your solutions, get people to support petitions for change, if necessary show up in ATL at your local legislators office. Stop reading, and get moving…….
Name One
May 25th, 2012
4:19 pm
The Fernbank Science Center is simply tired and does not appeal to today’s students. Check out below how bloated their payroll is. It is unfathomable they have so many well-paid exhibit designers, despite the exhibits rarely changing. The exhibits are an embarassment. There are some quality teachers there, but as is the DeKalb Way of Gene Walker/Tom Bowen/ex-Supt. Crawford Lewis/Ramona Tyson, FSC festers with a beyond bloated bureaucracy. FSC should be affiliated with DCSS, but it really, really needs to be a seperate non-profit. Now.
Administrator – Director, Fernbank $98,568
Administrator – Administrative Coordinator $91,884
Administrator – Administrative Coordinator $91,884
Support Maintenance $56,402
Support – Technical Support $66,088
Support – Support Services $6,790
Support – Security $48,093
Support – Security $47,150
Support – Security $46,929
Support – Secretary $39,427
Support – Secretary $39,427
Support – Scheduler $43,516
Support – Photographer $67,380
Support – Media Specialist $91,320
Support – Maintenance $47,150
Support – Maintenance $34,276
Support – Maintenance $44,836
Support – Maintenance $33,616
Support – Maintenance $32,426
Support – Maintenance $39,276
Support – Head Custodian $52,091
Support – Geologist $75,430
Support – General Administration $50,520
Support – Gardener $44,836
Support – Exhibit Designer $77,892
Support – Exhibit Designer $69,516
Support – Exhibit Designer $84,720
Support – Exhibit Designer $63,576
Support – Designer/Photographer $66,096
Support – Custodial $31,048
Support – Custodial $29,310
Support – Custodial $31,048
Support – CTSS $49,194
Support – Clerical $7,679
Support – Clerical $37,485
Support – Bookkeeper $27,707
Teacher – Science $75,888
Teacher – Science $45,467
Teacher – Science $52,688
Teacher – Science $56,662
Teacher – Science $70,913
Teacher – Science $77,467
Teacher – Science $75,888
Teacher – Science $67,488
Teacher – Science $93,192
Teacher – Science $42,084
Teacher – Robotics and Engineering $98,556
Teacher – Physics $49,728
Teacher – Physics $66,424
Teacher – Meterology $71,543
Teacher – Ecology $81,504
Teacher – Ecology $61,692
Teacher – Ecology $91,320
Teacher – Ecology $57,714
Teacher – Ecology $98,556
Teacher – Earth and Space $81,504
Teacher – Chemistry $56,695
Teacher – chemistry $61,752
Teacher – Botany $76,089
Teacher – Botany $50,227
Teacher – Biology $71,556
Teacher – Biology $74,674
Teacher – Biology $83,112
Teacher – Astronomy $98,556
Teacher – Agriculture $87,876
Midway
May 25th, 2012
4:24 pm
“N. Dekalb needs to stop their whining and pay up.”
I live in south Dekalb, and I can tell you north DeKalb and central DeKalb have been paying up for a long time now. The DCSS have been raking in their property tax money for years. During the boom years the school system wasted tons of money, sucking up the extra tax revenue they received from housing bubble property values. They created a monster, and now that monster is on the loose. Squeezing even more out of them will be disastrous. DCSS needs to shrink the bloated system back to size.
bootney farnsworth
May 25th, 2012
4:24 pm
damn
I shoulda been working at FCS.
they pay really well
bootney farnsworth
May 25th, 2012
4:26 pm
why don’t other counties help pay?
which county has money to spare?
even if they did, why bail out DCSS?
bootney farnsworth
May 25th, 2012
4:27 pm
OK, lets try it this way….
cut FCS, cut football.
time to choose
skipper
May 25th, 2012
4:29 pm
@enough already…(previous page comment)
Amazing, when someone tells the truth, nobody can come back with anything……….and its the elephant in the room!!!!! What a cluster the system is. You called it correctly!
Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
4:30 pm
@ Donaldo, The public has come up with solutions, however those running the system (Board Members and Superintendent) do not want to make the cuts needed. They do not want to let employees in the Palace and throughout the district that have been shown by an independent consultant as not being needed go. They do not want to cut programs that their children are apart of, that cost more per pupil to run and only benefit a handful of kids. Those running the system do not want to make the necessary cuts or to control spending.
Those running the district do not understand needs vs. wants. We want magnet programs, Fernbank Science, Montessori, theme schools, but do we really need them? No we do not need these things and need to focus on educating everyone well, and not just a chosen handful.
The Winner Is
May 25th, 2012
4:47 pm
This post from the DeKalb School Watch Too blog nails it! Millions on Special Ed Lead Teachers who never work with children! No data on the effectiveness of Parent Resource Centers. DCSS spends much more on security than Gwinnett, even though Gwinnett is a much, much larger system. And don’t even get me started on the tens of milliosn the Board of Education wastes on legal fees!
https://dekalbschoolwatch.wordpress.com/2012/05/24/2012-13-budget-proposals-so-far/
dekalbite2 says:
May 24, 2012 at 9:50 PM
I. Fernbank costs around $6,000,000 to $7,000,000 to operate – around $5,000,000 in salary and benefits, plus transportation of thousands of students to and from the center for a one time science experience, etc.
II. Coaches, Parent Center personnel, Coordinators, and Special Education Lead Teachers – none of which has been tied to student performance or have shown a relationship to increased student achievement for DCSS:
A. Coaches – Instructional, Instructional Change, Graduation, Literacy, Math, etc. are all certified personnel who could teach but do not teach. There are 190 of them (called Instructional Specialists on the state Salary and Travel audit), and they consume around $15,000,000 in Salary and Benefits. DCSS is only obligated to spend around $4,000,000 on Instructional Coaches per Title 1 guidelines. We are not required to have all of those other coaches.
B. Parent Centers – We have around 80 Parent Center personnel and spend around $4,500,000 in salary and benefits for them. No other school systems spends this. We are only obligated under Title 1 guidelines to spend 1% of Title 1 funds on parent involvement which equates to around $400,000.
C. Coordinators – We have around 60 coordinators which make around $100,000 per employee in salary and benefits for a total of $5,600,000. DCSS used to have less than 20 coordinators. Programs and services were consolidated and good clerical support allowed them to wear several hats.
D. Special Education Lead Teachers -There are 90+ DeKalb Special Ed Lead Teachers, Coaches (not to be confused with the above named coaches) and Coordinators (not to be confused with the above named coordinators. They are termed Special Education Specialists on the Salary and Travel audit. They serve 130+ schools and cost $8,000,000+ a year in salary and benefits. They are in charge of paperwork for the special education program and never teach a single child. By contrast, Gwinnett Schools has 20+ Special Education Specialists serving 130+ schools costing them around $1,700,000. DeKalb has 7,500+ Special Education students while Gwinnett has 16,000+ Special Education students.
III. Security – DCSS spends almost $11,000,000 for around 200 Security personnel – including every demographically comparable school system. Look at the figures for DeKalb Security.
http://dekalbschoolwatch.wordpress.com/dcss-spending/the-cost-of-security/
IV. Outsourcing
It is time to look at PARTIAL outsourcing in many areas – food services, custodial, grounds maintenance, security, etc.
V. Maintenance: DCSS with 95,000 students spends around $13,000,000 a year for maintenance while Gwinnett spends around $9,600,000 (and Gwinnett also has more schools)
VI. Further consolidation of schools – Last time we saved around $4,000,000 by consolidating schools. We could save additional dollars by more consolidations.
VII. Pre-K – DCSS is the only system left that runs our Pre-K program in the schools. The other counties let the daycares run their programs with good results for their students. The state will pay the full amount if it is run in the daycares. We pay TIWCE as much to run our Pre-K for the same number of students as Pre-K would be in daycares. Pre-K in daycares has the same teacher certification requirements (teacher certified in early childhood) and the same curriculum.
VIII. Counselors and Assistant Principals – DeKalb is overstaffed and/or pays over the school day in hours for counselors and assistant principals. 270+ Assistant Principals cost $25,000,000 in salary and benefits and 320+ Counselors cost $25,000,000 in salary and benefits. This is a total of $50,000,000 for 590 Counselors and Assistant Principals. Counselor hours need to be reduced from 9 to 8 and position numbers need to align with other school systems. If need be counselors in very small elementary schools can share a counselor. Assistant Principal numbers can also be aligned with the marketplace numbers.
IX. Legal fees
DCSS is spending $13,000,000 a year in legal fees, most of this in this on the Heery Mitchell suit with no end in sight. Soon we will owe lawyers any money we MIGHT (and this is a gamble) make. We paid King and Spalding around $5,000,000 last year and Sutherland, Asbill and Brennan around $7,000,000 and Josie Alexander over $1,000,000. In addition, we have an in house legal group now.
X. Scripted Learning programs
DCSS spent $6,000,000 last year on America’s Choice, a scripted learning program that has not only shown no efficacy for DCSS students, in fact the low income schools it serves are behind the rates of achievement for every other metro school system. DCSS has been purchasing this program for six years with no ROI. Now Dr. Atkinson wants another scripted learning program called Success for All to replace America’s Choice. Will it also cost millions?
XI. Magnet programs should be housed in existing schools so there is little duplication of admin and support and should cost no more than regular education students. Parents should provide all transportation.
These are but a FEW examples. There are many more that would not impact our teachers in the classroom. When you balance the budget on the backs of the teachers, you balance it on the backs of the students.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
4:50 pm
DCSd has had all of these “choice” programs and have created “pockets” of successful schools, but overall these “choice” programs have done nothing to move the overall district forward academically. So, I have to ask, why does the district continue down this road? In my view, it is time to reassess why we are spending all of this money and seeing few results.
RebeccaAnEducator
May 25th, 2012
4:52 pm
@As I Was Saying Before Being Censored: Yes, saw your points on the earlier topic and wondered where they’d gone to… !!!
I take it this is the only way you’ll get your views on Private School Tax Credits heard. Bully for you! The censoring of contrasting viewpoints only breed cynicism. Are you listening, AJC?
Donaldo
May 25th, 2012
4:56 pm
Teacher Reader: I must be confused then, I was under the impression those you refer to are public employees subject to taxpayer approval. I guess my suggestion of organizing to change is landing on deaf ears, if public employees are not meeting the needs of the public, then it is your duty to organize and take steps to correct, however organizing and combatting a system which has been described is not easy, I know, been there, done that. My question would be, does the community have the will power and fortitude to take action, because whatever has been done to date does not appear to be working. Just an observation, former educator, parent of 2 Cobb grads, taxpayer, independent businessman, most of all someone who does not go down easy.
Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
May 25th, 2012
5:44 pm
The Fernbank stuff is just to try to get everybody to pony up. They could probably cut 30% of their staff and nobody would notice. Hard to give up those union dues. As a DeKalb native and resident, it is hard to watch us become the Detroit of the South. I guess they will turn the street lights off next.
anonymousABC
May 25th, 2012
5:57 pm
The instructional coach program and all parent centers are being dissolved for the upcoming school year. The coaches have to reapply for other positions. I learned a lot from America’s Choice and it made me a better teacher.It was not a scripted program. I embraced the program and it worked for me and the children benefited. Components are Reader;s Workshop, Writer’s Workshop, and a Skills Block. When school started the students were tested using the DRA, an indivualized assessment. During reading, I had a 15 minute mini-lesson followed by a work session. During the work session the students met with me for their reading group. We had a book room with leveled readers funded by TItle I. Every student was taught on their specific reading level. These are all best pracitices. During Writer’s Workshop the students leaned about the different types of writing and they wrote everyday. During the Skills Block I taught Daily Oral Language, Grammar, and Phonics. All of these components are or should be included in college level education courses.
Success for All is a scripted reading program. It will work it teacher embrace the program and work hard. They may feel stifled. I am familiar with it but I haven’t used it.
Fernbank…I have taught in Dekalb for 14 years. I think Fernbank is wonderful but most years my students get to only go one time to the planetarium. I have had classroom visits for about four or five times in those years. The teachers are wonderful. I really don’t think that it does enough to impact all the students in Dekalb. Cut the program.
Rebecka
May 25th, 2012
5:59 pm
Just a few clarifications:
1. STT serves 90 students per semester;
2. The lease on the Fernbank forest reverted back to Fernbank Inc.;
3. If there is no science or cultural center on the property, it reverts back to Fernbank Inc.;
4. The Grant department has been correcting and rewriting dissertations for ‘leaders’ who are in substandard doctoral programs and cannot write a dissertation for that substandard program. Gets in the way of writing grants.
anonymous
May 25th, 2012
6:08 pm
In Gwinnett the special education teacher handles a lot of the testing and the student moves through the SST process in a more timely manner. We have students that get bogged down in the process and are never tested when they truly should be served in special education. It really helps when a parent requests testing. There is federal law that states that when a parent asks for testing it has be to done if a specific time 60 or 90 days…I can’t remember. A parent has to be their child’s advocate. I think that Dekalb needs to looks at how Gwinnett runs their program. I had both of my student’s tested in Gwinnett and it didin’t take long. Now many teachers don’t want to refer their students because of a new federally mandated process called RTI. Many administrator and teachers feel that many students will not be served because of this process.
DeKalb County Bus Driver
May 25th, 2012
6:11 pm
I think the children enjoy going and learn a lot. I here good comments when they return to the bus.
DeKalb County Bus Driver/Mom
May 25th, 2012
6:20 pm
I think children enjoy going to Fern Bank. I always hear good comments when they come back to the bus. I don’t think we should raise taxes there must be other avenues.
bootney farnsworth
May 25th, 2012
6:36 pm
and these avenues might be….?
Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
6:44 pm
I enjoy going to the movies, but my budget can’t afford the $10 ticket. Just because the kids enjoy it, doesn’t mean that the tax payer can afford it. This way of thinking is what has many individuals in debt, and is not the way that I want those making decisions on how to spend the money that I send in for taxes to make their decisions.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
7:06 pm
Hey, Marshall “You have to vote for SPLOST in order to change the Board of Education” Orson…were you responsible for those PR fluff pieces on Fernbank that were shown on Fox 5 and WXIA? They were really silly.
Save FSC
May 25th, 2012
8:03 pm
What does the FSC do? They excite children and their families on the importance of nature and science. They show kids that science isn’t just rote memorization from a book, but it is all around us. This type of center is exactly what is needed to engage kids. What does it do? Take a look at just part of a class, and hear the excitement, EXCITEMENT, of the kids looking at nature.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXFIfktx4NQ&feature=g-upl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhFIb7O7zvg&feature=g-upl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AogMVl8GLWw&feature=g-upl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALIiojSJPrA&feature=g-upl
d
May 25th, 2012
8:28 pm
The system-wide teacher of the year is a Fernbank teacher. I’ve seen him many times this year at my school bringing the science more alive for students at my high school. I have a friend who works at an elementary school, and she has had Fernbank teachers bring labs to her classroom as well. I truly believe FSC is a valuable service to DeKalb and I think that there should be some way to save it, even if at a different physical location.
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
May 25th, 2012
8:44 pm
I will absolutely not support a tax increase if class size goes up even by one student and Fernbank stays open. Move the teachers into the schools. (Though I hear they really don’t want to go.)
DO NOT INCREASE CLASS SIZE WHILE LUXURIES LIKE FERNBANK STAY OPEN.
Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
8:44 pm
For DeKalb tax payers who believe the EVERYTHING including Fernbank need to be on the table before increased taxes and class sizes, we need to have our voices heard. Email the school board, attend the school board meeting next, get others to do the same. Those living in the Fernbank Neighborhood will do EVERYTHING in their power to keep their beloved Fernbank Science Center open. Those with opposing view points need to be heard by the school board, just as loud if not louder than those wanting to keep it.
dekalbite
May 25th, 2012
8:52 pm
DCSS can afford to spend over $400,000 a year to maintain science exhibits, but we can’t afford science teachers for the schools that teach science content every day to the same students, and we can’t afford over 50 cents a student a year for science equipment and supplies for science instruction in our schools.
Look at the Fernbank Designer salaries (they maintain the relatively few Fernbank exhibits) – from the 2011 state Salary and Travel audit:
Designer $77,381
Designer $63,360
Designer $84,073
Designer $65,827
Designer $69,178
Total: $359,819
With benefits – $431,782 for five Fernbank Designers.
And why are we paying $56,000 a year in salary and benefits for a Cabinetmaker.
DeKalb science scores have declined even as those 28 teachers have been hard at work providing “enrichment” for some students in the schools because most of our students do not know even the most basic science content. Our students cannot master the basics of science content from 2 or 3 visits by a Fernbank science instructor no matter how good the delivery. MASTERY of science content can ONLY be achieved by daily science instruction delivered by a competent science teacher.
Look at the 2011 science scores for DeKalb:
Science % FAILED by Grade Level
3rd grade – 30.9%
4th grade – 33.6%
5th grade – 35.2%
6th grade – 42.2%
7th grade – 31.9%
8th grade – 49.9%
Almost half of our 8th graders do not know the most basic concepts in science.
Fernbank Science Center is good for enrichment, but our students MUST have the basics. That is what we expect for our tax dollars.
dekalbite
May 25th, 2012
8:55 pm
If the Fernbank teachers are out in the schools every day teaching science lessons, then why are the admin and support numbers still so high – equal to the number of Fernbank Science Center teachers (one admin and support for every science teacher)?
Since the Fernbank teachers are out in the schools most of the day, they should be placed in schools all over the county. This way they would be more geographically accessible to all of the county. Fernbank Science Center which is only a building without the forest anymore should be shuttered, and the admin and support personnel should then be eliminated. Millions could be saved in facilities and admin and support without sacrificing the enrichment from the Fernbank teachers.
The only guarantee we have right now is that 40 students to a class is unacceptable and untenable for students.
Business as usual can no longer be part of the “DeKalb Way.”
Melanie
May 25th, 2012
8:55 pm
Trade the renouned Fernbank Science Center for a scripted, failed program ( Success for All) and wat for more wasted dollars and no positive results.
Dunwoody Mom
May 25th, 2012
9:02 pm
Earlier this morning I asked several questions as to what data can be given to justify the continued support of FSC…so far there has been silence from those who support FSC.
@Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
9:07 pm
“Those living in the Fernbank Neighborhood will do EVERYTHING in their power to keep their beloved Fernbank Science Center open. Those with opposing view points need to be heard by the school board, just as loud if not louder than those wanting to keep it.”
http://dekalbschoolwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/letter-from-fernbank-elementary-school.html
The Fernbank community is arguably the most powerful group of parents in the metro area – bar none. Look at this open letter from the Fernbank Elementary School Council to the DeKalb Board of Education urging them to close neighborhood schools while protecting Fernbank Science Center from ANY cuts.
Marshal Orson signed the open letter to the Board of Education. He is now running for the DeKalb County Board of Education.
@Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
9:09 pm
The Fernbank community is arguably the most powerful group of parents in the metro area – bar none. Look at this open letter from the Fernbank Elementary School Council to the DeKalb Board of Education urging them to close neighborhood schools while protecting Fernbank Science Center from ANY cuts.
Marshal Orson signed the open letter to the Board of Education. He is now running for the DeKalb County Board of Education.
Oops! Here is the linkj:
The Fernbank community is arguably the most powerful group of parents in the metro area – bar none. Look at this open letter from the Fernbank Elementary School Council to the DeKalb Board of Education urging them to close neighborhood schools while protecting Fernbank Science Center from ANY cuts.
Marshal Orson signed the open letter to the Board of Education. He is now running for the DeKalb County Board of Education.
Oops! Here is the link:
http://dekalbschoolwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/letter-from-fernbank-elementary-school.html
Teacher Reader
May 25th, 2012
10:39 pm
@ @Teacher Reader
It scares me that Orson could be on the school board, as he appears to only care about Fernbank and his own, and not the good of the entire district. I think of what he said about SPLOST and shutter at how he gave false information and scared people into voting for it. WE need people on the school board, who care more about the greater good of the county and how we can better educate ALL children and ensure that ALL children receive a quality education. We do not need any more on the board that are laser focused on what is best for their neighborhood.
Knowing that the Fernbank Community has a Save Fernbank Science Center blog/web site going, should make everyone in DeKalb go HUM!!!! If Orson is part of this group, those not living in Fernbank, but able to vote for/against him, should also take some time to think about who is the best candidate for bettering our school system. We do not need any more candidates/school board members who are not willing to make difficult decisions for the betterment of our entire system and who are focused only on their immediate area of the county.
@ Melanie, Success For All is paid for with Title One funds. Title One funds cannot be used to run/pay for Fernbank. I do not like Success For All or any packaged plan that claims to be the end all be all in educating our children. As a former teacher, packaged programs encourage our teachers and students into being useful idiots and do not allow creativity, enthusiasm, and excitement. Most package programs have “success” shown with “research” paid for by those creating the program. Such data holds no weight in my book, as it’s like letting the fox in the hen house.
Save FSC
May 25th, 2012
10:51 pm
Many people have brought up the low scores and the selective group that FSC serves. The programs are free to very affordable. All you have to do is show up!
About the low scores, it is really about the families. A family that shows involvement with their child in science and nature will reflect on the scores. No amount of money will bring those scores up without the willing participation of the student and/or family. It is just not going to happen. I would support an increase in price for some of the programs to help offset the cost, but getting rid of the programs only punishes those that do care about science. At the very least, the FSC can help spark an interest in those students that wouldn’t otherwise be interested in science.
Miss Management
May 25th, 2012
11:29 pm
@Lynn Hamilton – You are so confused. You actually started a PETITION to SAVE FERNBANK when you think that the IMAX is there? This is NOT about the museum – it’s about the old Fernbank Science Center – with the planetarium – located next to Fernbank Elementary. Geesh! My lord. I think you should use the moniker “Miss Leading”!
Miss Management
May 25th, 2012
11:36 pm
Do you all remember when an administrator asked for approval of the science materials budget at a board meeting? It was $50,000 — FOR THE WHOLE REST OF THE SYSTEM! That’s $50,000 for 100,000 students’ science supplies! That’s 50 Cent Each… Lord.
What’s Fernbank’s budget again?
OTOH
May 26th, 2012
12:35 am
So Fernbank Science Center, at $4.7 million per year divided by 95,000 DCSS students per year = $49 and change per student. DCSS BOE allocated $.50 per student for science materials. Perhaps if Fernbank’s money was instead allocated to science equipment in all the DeKalb schools, the science teachers already in those schools could inspire all those potential STEM students who only caught the science fever from Fernbank and a few more.
OTOH
May 26th, 2012
12:38 am
Reality is those who want to keep Fernbank Science Center need to pony up with money and fund-raising. Quit demanding everyone else pay for what you want or waiting for someone else to come up with the cash. If you want it, go do it.
Matt
May 26th, 2012
12:47 am
I think it’s funny that the Science Center is deemed a luxury. I think the real luxury are the standardized tests students are put through every year. Sure, you get to know how your kid ranks in filling in bubbles compared to other kids, but is that something we really need? How much money is wasted buying tests, buying test prep materials, and using teacher time to prep for tests? When is a kid supposed to learn independent thinking, cooperative problem solving, and a healthy intellectual curiosity when they’re constantly cramming for tests? I’d wager the county could save millions by getting rid of that luxury.
Life is not about filling in bubbles. Filling in bubbles is not a skill you can use outside of school. Filling in bubbles won’t solve a math problem, fix a car, or even mow the lawn. If the entire school district is the best in the country at filling in bubbles, is that really something to be proud of? You’ve taught kids to cram information in and regurgitate it. Alas, they can’t remember 95% of it anymore, because they never actually got the chance to learn anything – to really grasp a concept, work through it, analyze it, bounce it around in their head, see how it applies. But good God, they’ll know for the week of the big test that Georgia was founded as a penal colony by James Oglethorpe and that a^2 + b^2 = c^2!
The Science Center is something to be proud of. Inspiring kids to reach new heights is something to be proud of. It’s true, you can’t measure inspiration with a bubble metric. That hardly makes it a luxury. If we’re not sending kids to school to inspire them, what are we sending them for?
If it does get the axe, I do hope some philanthropic company or citizen helps keep it going. We need more science centers, not less.
Truth in Moderation
May 26th, 2012
2:06 am
PUBLIC SCHOOL BOUNTY HUNTERS
That’s how school districts in Texas plan to offset falling revenues.
Every student has an attendance record bounty on their head. Aspiring Supers plan to “recover” lost revenue when hapless students wander off campus and miss the daily attendance count. How, you ask? Using good old fashioned microchip technology (RFID) stealthily embedded in their mandatory student I.D.’s.
“We want to harness the power of (the) technology to make schools safer, know where our students are all the time in a school, and increase revenues,” district spokesman Pascual Gonzalez said. “Parents expect that we always know where their children are, and this technology will help us do that.”
Read more: http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/education/article/Students-will-be-tracked-via-chips-in-IDs-3584339.php#ixzz1vx9SK77g
Hmmm. They can keep all their tracking data in a Ped-O-File.
DCSD Educator
May 26th, 2012
2:21 am
The parents need to beat the drum for a simple solution. Please read all the way through before making a decision. It’s going to take parents being professional, but persistent to make the changes necessary. Please do this to save our schools! We want to restore the pride in DeKalb, but others stand in the way.
1) CUT positions at the district level. Rearranging personnel still keeps a bloated payroll. At least half of the positions are not needed. There are too many layers in a rotting onion.
2) Eliminate summer school! Re-teach and enrich after testing. Give the re-test the last week of school. Other districts do this and have saved millions!
3) Go to a four day school week. This has been suggested for summers, but the real savings comes from not running the buses. It would only add 75 minutes to the school day to still meet state requirements. For those who think of school as daycare, schools could voluntarily provide a modified program to accommodate parent needs. If parents know a year ahead of time, they can make plans. The savings from not running buses one day a week, paying cafeteria staff four days a week, paying for fewer subs, and not paying bus drivers five days would save millions each year.
4) Stop purchasing new textbooks for a while. Just because the state has an adoption cycle and approved vendors on a list does not mean DeKalb has to act. Teachers can teach the skills using other resources.
We need parents to also fight to keep our custodians. DeKalb piloted an outsourcing program about ten years ago and the results were not good. The contractors do not pay for background checks, so you will not know who is in the building. The outsourced custodians do not report to the building principal so there was no real work being done and there was high level of property stolen. Schools also need at least one fulltime librarian. They teach lessons on how to do research, locating information in texts, technology instruction, etc. They do more than check out and shelve books.
If more parents spent time fighting for the schools rather than against them, we might actually right the sinking ship and complete this journey together. I teach because I love kids and want to make a difference. I do not do this job for the money, although paying my bills is important. Someone needs to stand up and help. The new teacher evaluation will help administrators clean out mediocre or poor teachers. I’m proud of my portfolio from the pilot. It was rigorous, but in my opinion, what good teachers should be doing anyway. Raising the taxes is not going to solve the problem. There is still a deficit and unjustified expenses. I am also a taxpayer and do not want my money wasted any longer.
If parents would push this list, within three years there would be enough money to make employees whole and even “catch them up” for the years without a raise or step while keeping all programs in place. I have a full day with excited children & need to go to sleep. Please find out the numbers from DCSD and calculate the savings for yourself. It will surprise you!
Thank you.
James Parsons
May 26th, 2012
4:34 am
Fernbank got me into the college program of my choice. Without it, the next 20 years of my life would have taken a completely different (and deprived!) path. From planetarium and observatory programs in elementary school to the Scientific Tools and Techniques classes as an 8th grader to the college credit microbiology course I took as a senior, I received a lifetime world class education via Fernbank, and I’m far from a unique case. Over the years, weekends, school days, summer evenings, I met Atlantans of every age and background there. Few institutions are capable of crossing boundaries like an open invitation to learn.
It’s a sad myopia that views an asset like Fernbank as a liability; that values short term tax relief over long term investment; that doesn’t recognize that the success and prosperity of a community comes from prioritizing public education rather than scapegoating it.
Dunwoody Mom
May 26th, 2012
6:52 am
I see the Fernbank PR Machine is in full force!! Marshall has gotten to the media as well.
You know Fernbank “people”, if you fought as hard and passionately for the students of the entire school district as you do for anything with the name of Fernbank, progress could be made across the entire district. But, sadly, your view of the world and what’s good for DCSD does not extend beyond Fernbank Elementary and the FSC. Tragic, really.
Dunwoody Mom
May 26th, 2012
6:55 am
Marshall, instead of using your time, energy and money to try and keep Fernbank open despite the massive and devasting financial situation DCSD is in, use that same energy to find alternative sources of funding for FSC.
bootney farnsworth
May 26th, 2012
7:45 am
you guys gotta accept a basic reality.
you’re broke. beyond broke.
DCSS has been spending beyond it means for years. the bill has finally come due.
the county is not as affluent as it once was
the quality of education is not nearly what it once was
the economy is so bad there is no money to be had from new taxes, even if the citizens
would allow them.
@James Parsons
May 26th, 2012
10:00 am
“I received a lifetime world class education via Fernbank, and I’m far from a unique case. ”
The STT program that Fernbank runs is the only program Fernbank has that serves students daily (for one semester now). STT serves 180 students a year – 90 a semester.
DCSS has 95,000 students. That makes the STT program pretty unique. Many students qualify, but only a handful actually receive the services.
It is an excellent program for the lucky 90 a semester that get in, but it could be run by housing Fernbank teachers in the schools all over the county. Many more students would have access to the STT program you found so beneficial. Millions of dollars would be saved in facilities, transportation and admin and support if the building called Fernbank Science Center is closed or given to the Fernbank Museum.
Teacher2
May 26th, 2012
10:20 am
Mixed feelings on Fernbank. My class went 3 times to the planeterium this year. 4 hours out of the classroom for 30 minutes of “slide shows” broadcast across the “sky”. If what is learned on the field trip is not reinforced in the class, the students forget the lesson. We had one on-site visit that was more beneficial to the students than the 3 we left the school for 4 hours. I have never been with a class to “other” areas because that would cost money for my title 1 students. Reorganization of the center and updated lessons is the only way I see to benefit the students of Dekalb. Since we have to pay for special exhibits going private might make it worth the trip and cost.
@dunwoody mom
May 26th, 2012
10:26 am
You are correct in that Marshall Orson has displayed an affinity for the Fernbank area even as the causes he championed for them were IMHO detrimental to the students all over DeKalb outside the Fernbank community. Personally, I would vote for McChesney over Orson.
Eugene Walker was supported by the Fernbank community in his last election. Fernbank escaped redistricting, is getting a new school even as millions were spent on a beautiful new wing not too many years ago (that will be torn down), they are bumped up to the top of the SPLOST IV list (Fernbank campaigned heavily for the passage of SPLOST IV) and all cuts to Fernbank Science Center were put on hold for the last two years even as teacher class sizes soared all over DeKalb and neighborhood schools that served children every day were shuttered.
I was never a McChesney fan, but I am beyond disappointed by his competition.
yes i am worried
May 26th, 2012
10:40 am
@Dunwoody Mom
Not only do I agree with you, but I will be sending a donation to McChesney! And I almost never give political contributions, but Marshall Orson will not make things better in DeKalb.
Let’s dispense the educators at FSC into our community schools for next year, and keep the planetarium open so that we meet the terms of the lease agreement. That gives all of Fernbanks’ supporters 9 months to figure out a better way.
Teacher Reader
May 26th, 2012
12:06 pm
@ Matt, if Fernbank Science Center was half the museum of Tellus, it would be something to be proud of. As it is, the exhibits, a term I use loosely are old and outdated. Children visiting the museum are discouraged from looking at the exhibits because of time constraints. Kids are ushered into the room or planetarium and ushered out.
The biggest benefit of Fernbank Science is to the Fernbank Community, because they do not want a vacant building in their neighborhood.
I personally have had enough of over spending in our district. Fernbank School does not need a new school. There are schools in far worse shape and they received an addition as others have stated. A new school for Fernbank should not be a priority for the district. Just as spending 7 million on a science center is something the DeKalb community cannot afford.
We are beyond broke as a school district. It’s time to severely cut spending and anything that is not a need, needs to go. As DCSD educator suggested, new text books each year is not a necessity right now. Buying workbooks that are not used is an expense that we cannot afford. Paying 7 million for a a science center and having the failing science test scores is something that is not a good value for tax payer money.
We are not in a position to keep things that are nice to have. WE ARE FLAT BROKE!!!!! We don’t know the outcome of the law suits and how much more money they will cost the tax payer.
Anyone fighting for Fernbank Science does not have ALL of the children in DCSS in mind.
I will not be voting for Orson and will vote for McChesney and will even buy a sign for my yard for him, something I do not usually do. It is time that as tax payers we fight for what is best for ALL children in DeKalb and not just those in our backyards.
Loving Life!
May 26th, 2012
1:23 pm
Here are a few ideas that I believe no one here will like however, in times of desperation such as this DeKalb needs to place all its cards on the table to ensure that its educational standards are not compromised and needs to evaluate everything as Dr. Cheryl Akinson has done. I applaud her skill as the new DeKalb Superintendent, inheriting a system with deeply-rooted issues and massive needs of reform at the central office. However, Akinson needs to approach a deficit nearing $79 million with a no-nonsense attitude. Below are a few of my recommendations as a former middle school assistant principal and currently a specialty high school guidance counselor, I have experienced budget cuts ALL of my years in administration – there needs to be a more perdurable solution to budget woes.
CLOSE SCHOOLS TO FILL EMPTY SEATS
ES captivity: 52,073 *this does not include the captivity of the closed ES sites: Atherton, Forest Hills, Glen Haven, Gresham Park, Medlock, Peachcrest, Sky Haven, or Tilson.
ES enrollment: 49,596
Seats available: 2,477
>>With the average captivity of DeKalb ES at 652 students, the district is looking at a possible closure of only 3 or 4 schools, saving 16 million.
>>select from Austin ES, Fernbank ES, Gresham Park ES, Pleasantdale ES, Peachcrest ES, Rockbridge ES, Smoke Rise ES as these schools are up for replacement in SPLOST IV (see end)
MS captivity: 21,622 *this does not include Avondale MS
MS enrollment: 21,188
Seats available: 434
>>No recommendations for closure at the middle level
HS captivity: 29,575 *this does not include Avondale HS, Heritage School, Hooper Alexander, Arabia Mountain, or Briarcliff Open Campus
HS enrollment: 26,818
Seats available: 2,757
>>With the average captivity of DeKalb HS being 1,107 students, the district is looking at a possible closure of only 2 or 3 schools, saving 20 million.
>>select from Clarkston, Columbia, McNair, Miller Grove, or Towers as these are the lowest HS in population and/or growth potential
*all information retrieved from GA Department of Education and DeKalb Schools
END EXPENSIVE AFFILIATIONS
The International Baccalaureate program is a wonderful curriculum and instructional mindset that all of children have been fortunate enough to have gone through however, it is a pricey affiliation with the elementary and middle grades as IB charges a $3,100 annual fee for a school to bare its name. I propose the district transition its IB programs at the ES and MS levels into “Global Studies” programs which will offer similar courses instead. Essentially the program will remain the same, the only changes will be in the name. The high school IB programs would remain unchanged. Transitioning IB programs at Druid Hills MS, Avondale ES, Fernbank ES, and Midvale ES will saving the district $12,400. Also, IB candidate schools Salem MS and Tucker MS would save almost $46,000 as application fees have risen to to a total of $23,000 per school! Please also be aware that the largest commitment of IB schools budgets is teacher training as IB requires that all IB instructors be certified by IB and these costs include the IB fee for the seminar, travel, lodging and sometimes car rental expenses. Global Studies would allow for teachers already IB certificated to coach and counsel those who are not. Typically this is a variable of $20-60,000 per year average. http://truthaboutib.com/howmuchdoesibcost/ibfees.html
CONSOLIDATE SPECIALTY SITES
Another area for investigation to ease budget woes would be specialty educational centers. DeKalb should consider consolidation based simple administrative costs as the average principal earns $93,106 annually. http://swz.salary.com/SalaryWizard/School-Principal-Salary-Details-Atlanta-GA.aspx
*Consolidation of Eagle Woods Academy, Margaret Harris, Coralwood into a single Specialty Learning Center
*Consolidation of DeKalb Alternative Night School, DeKalb Alternative School, DeKalb Transition Academy into a single Conduct Correction Center
*Consolidation of DeKalb ES of the Arts at Terry Mills and DeKalb School of the Arts
*Consolidation of Elizabeth Andrews with a comprehensive high school
*Consolidation of DeKalb Early College Academy with a comprehensive high school
*Consolidation of DeKalb HS of Technology South with a comprehensive high school
*Consolidation of Warren Technical School with a comprehensive high school
Elimination of 9 principal positions will save $0.837 million.
SPLOST IV PROJECTS ELIMINATION
Of the SPLOST IV Project List the following can be omitted to pay off a deferred debt once funds become available and allow the district to build a contingency fund to manage future debt:
-$10.6 million, Coralwood Diagnostic Center Addition (as the school would be consolidated with Eagle Woods Academy and Margaret Harris)
-$2.9 million, Wesley Chapel Early Learning Center (use existing campus)
-$2.5 million, Demolition “Repurpose and/or demolish surplus properties as needed.” (simply sell surplus properties and land bank one site where student growth is paramount)
-$16.0 million, Henderson MS Renovation/Addition (if system closes 3 high schools, it can repurpose one as a replacement for Henderson MS)
-$37.4 million, McNair MS Replacement (if district closes 3 high schools, it can repurpose one as a replacement for McNair MS)
-$82.3 million, Replacement Elementary Schools (if the district closes 4 of the 7 schools due for replacement)
Elimination of the above will save $151.7 million.
LAND BANKING FOR FUTURE GROWTH
If the district closes 4 ES, 3 HS, and 9 specialty sites it will have 23 vacant schools sites – including 7 currently closed sites.
*new schools needed within the next decade: when a clusters’ enrollment at particular grade span surpasses 120% utilization a new school should be build followed by another at 150% utilization
supercluster (school type and year when additional school needed)
SC1 (ES 2013, MS 2014, HS 2015)
SC2 (MS now & 2018, HS now & 2021)**
*schools that need to be closed within the next decade: when a clusters’ enrollment at particular grade declines past 65% utilization a school should be closed
supercluster (school type and year when one school should close)
SC5 (ES 2013, MS 2014, HS 2015)**
In total the district will need 1 new ES, 3 new MS, and 3 new HS all in the northern half of the county away from SC3-5 where schools would close. Therefore it would make sense for the district to sell all surplus sites as they are located in low-to-no growth areas. The 3 HS could be reused as replacement MS and by selling 20 school sites the district saves $32.16 million.*
*this total was generated using the appraised property value of Tilson ES
http://web.co.dekalb.ga.us/PropertyAppraisal/realDisplay.asp?PID=15%20150%2015%20028
**this was suggesting using http://www.dekalb.k12.ga.us/www/documents/vision-2020/super-cluster-enrollment-projections.pdf which indicates the only areas in need of future sites will
SUMMARY
Deficit = $79 million
Closing 4 elementary schools = -$16 million
Closing 3 high schools = -$20 million
Transition from IB to Global Studies at MS and ES = -$0.138 million
Reorganization of 7 principal positions = $0.837 million
SPLOST IV Eliminations = $151.7 million
Selling Surplus Sites = $32.16 million
Layoff of 131 Assistant Principals = -$10 million *read my responce to a privious post on the
blog: http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2012/04/27/could-dekalb-schools-survive-without-129-assistant-principals-could-any-metro-system/?cp=2
FINAL SURPLUS OF $151.84 million to be used as a “rainy day” or contingency fund to rebuild reserves however, the SPLOST IV eliminations will lead into a mess of legal issues that the district will have to face. Still without those measures the district will have a surplus of $140,000 – much better than the current fiscal year’s $6 million shortfall.
Loving Life!
May 26th, 2012
1:24 pm
Oh – I almost for got! Above all, my suggestions above this would keep the Fernbank open!
Cigi
May 26th, 2012
2:54 pm
Loving Life,
What about Livsey? It has a very small enrollment. What about DeKalb School of the Arts? It has a small enrollment.Let’s see your plan is to close special ed centers, schools on the south end of the school system. Not mention any small programs on the north, but of course keep Fernbank Open? Is there any reason that you missed the small enrollment of North end schools? Suggestions like yours are why there is so much division in this system. People only want to save things that benefit them,not what may help everyone.
Dedicated Biologist
May 26th, 2012
3:02 pm
I had to note that some of the remarks about the Fernbank science center above seem to represent folks that may have visited it once, maybe twice, and only experienced a part of the curriculum. The Fernbank Science Center has trained 100s of thousands of children as well as thousands of others. I have brought a number of folks to the center to learn macroinvertebrate taxonomy over the years, Peavine Creek is an excellent and rare asset. The planetarium speaks for itself. I visited Fernbank Science Center long ago when I lived far away, and so its benefit is well outside the immediate community. If we are to decide to lose one of DeKalb’s only public scientific educational centers, at a time where internationally the United States is failing in science education, let’s at least have a full set of facts upon which to deliberate. How about use the scientific method – hypothesis, observation, analysis – get accurate and complete facts – before rushing to close Fernbank Science Center. How about considering what our school system goals are regarding science education before rushing to judgment. Too many folks feel entitled to have an opinion without having any knowledge or expertise, particularly about science. If you’ve not visited the center, used it, or are just not a science person, for the sake of our kids that are, please be judicious in your comments or get over there and see what is going on. Take a lab course, walk Peavine Creek, take some kick-net samples, identify some macroinvertebrates, identify some stars, take a physics lab. This type of education you cannot get in a normal classroom, your expenses would be multiplied if you tried to take this education out to individuals schools, assuming teachers would even be willing to try it. This opinion-without-knowledge approach is the reason our kids and our schools and ultimately our nation suffers in science. When the need is so great, surely, there are other non-science and non-mathematics curricula that should be cut, first.
dekalbite@Loving Life
May 26th, 2012
4:25 pm
“SPLOST IV Eliminations = $151.7 million
Selling Surplus Sites = $32.16 million”
You have some good idea. but you do realize that SPLOST IV cannot be used for anything but capital improvements – i.e. buildings, air conditioners, technology, etc. It cannot be used to pay teachers’ salaries or keep Fernbank personnel employed. So that is out as an option. We are facing 40 to a classroom, and SPLOST IV by law cannot be used to hire any additional teachers.
Selling the spare land also sounds good, but this is a one time proposition. We may be able plug the hole this year (real estate is not really doing so well in DeKalb so it will probably bring much less than you predict), but what about next year. Property tax rates may be up (as high as the state law allows and then no more ability to raise rates), but land value is predicted to go down (almost certainly if tax rates go up because more people will appeal their property assessments and will win since we are still greatly over assessed).
You can’t just sell off land and cross your fingers next year will be better. This is called poor planning or no planning for the future.
Annual expenditures must be cut. Annual expenditures are what makes up the General Operations Fund – i.e. that is what pays for the teachers, administrators and support personnel that are necessary to run the school system (90% of the annual recurring cost of the school system is personnel – expenses SPLOST cannot be used for and expenses a one time sale of land will not address next year).
Once you take away the $151 million (no legal) and $32 million (one time shot so not practical) then you have taken away most of your “found” revenue.
This is a complex issue and there are no easy solutions. The only solution students should not have to accept is 37 or 38 or 39 other students in their classroom. They will not be able to physically move in the classroom, and they will not get any individual attention when they do not understand a concept. Student achievement will drop, and quite frankly student achievement is the ONLY reason we have a school system and pay taxes.
You must not have been an assistant principal in Georgia if you don’t know the state law regarding SPLOST funding.
@Dedicated Biologist
May 26th, 2012
4:39 pm
“This opinion-without-knowledge approach is the reason our kids and our schools and ultimately our nation suffers in science. When the need is so great, surely, there are other non-science and non-mathematics curricula that should be cut, first.”
I took hundreds and hundreds of students to Fernbank Science Center over a span of 3 decades.
The instructors at Fernbank Science Center are their greatest resource. The Fernbank instructors would be just as great a resource if not a greater resource in the regular education schools. Spread throughout the county, they could still offer many of the services and instruction they now offer in the Fernbank Science Center building since they are in the schools most of the day per so many commenters, and since there is no Fernbank Forest available anymore. If the instructors are not in the schools most of the time, please correct me. That would mean many thousands of students are still being transported to the science center – an expensive proposition with today’s gas prices and also environmentally unsound (bringing 30 students to and fro on a bus to 1 instructor).
It seems the expense for 28 admin and support personnel and the facilities cost of the Fernbank building for 28 teachers who are mainly in the schools is quite excessive by anyone’s measure.
Science achievement is at an all time low for DeKalb’s 95,000 students and has been steadily declining despite the best efforts of the 28 Fernbank Science Center’s instructors. Just because we did it this way in the past (since the 1950s) does not mean it needs to be done this way in the future. Keep the best of Fernbank – its instructors – by placing them in the regular schools and eliminate the admin and support and facility overhead. Teachers instruct students, not buildings.
Loving Life!
May 26th, 2012
5:07 pm
@dekalbite, you are right I was teacher in GA and an AP in FL however, GA SPLOST funds can be used to pay off general obligation bonds ie if the district was to take out a loan today which is all contingent upon the credit quality of the district. “$32 million (one time shot so not practical)” The reason I selected Tinsely Elementary for the base property value is simply because it had one of the lowest appraisals of the schools I targeted yielding a very low estimate because of the uncertainty that exists in the market. Of course I agree that the cuts should occur at the personnel level as 90% of the districts budget goes towards supporting salaries (insanely high). How could this problem be solved? Offering early retirement agreement to veteran educators and hiring fresh-faced college students to replace them at much lower salaries? Consolidating the 5 Area Superintendents into 3 or 4? I would love to see DeKalb adopt a charter schools model as Fulton and other districts have done. The empowerment of parents through strong involvement within their children’s schools will ignite fundraising efforts and additional funds at the site level where cuts are felt the most.
@Cigi, the reason I omitted Livsey (and other smaller programs in the north) is due to the data showing that SC2 (which Livsey is apart of) has steady growth at the elementary level and closing a school might result in a shift that will cause overcrowding and the need for a new school in the future. If the district where to redistrict and pull students from the north to the south that would be good stewardship for using existing facilities however, it would increase transportation costs (with the fluctuations in the flue market Im not sure if that is the best plan).
bootney farnsworth
May 26th, 2012
5:35 pm
DCSS is in the same boat as GPC.
even if money fell from the sky today, it will only address the current issue.
it won’t solve the bigger issue of how you got there in the first place.
@Loving Life
May 26th, 2012
6:36 pm
“GA SPLOST funds can be used to pay off general obligation bonds ie if the district was to take out a loan today which is all contingent upon the credit quality of the district.”
Is this legal in Georgia? Can you redirect tax money meant for capital improvement into annual personnel salaries (90% of the annual operational expense for the DeKalb County School System)?
Perhaps more importantly, can you redirect tax money that the voters voted on for capital expenditures into personnel salaries?
I’m no lawyer, but perhaps you are. Here is the weblink to Georgia SPLOST:
http://www.gasplost.org/
What is the likelihood we will pay off a loan if we have not gotten our financial house in order? What is the likelihood citizens will be amenable to more debt? I do not believe our credit rating is AAA.
“The reason I selected Tinsely Elementary for the base property value…”
DeKalb does not have an elementary school named Tinsley.
Perhaps a bit of history is in order. In the 60s and 70s we had a lot of growth in north DeKalb. In the late 80s and 90s we had growth in south DeKalb while the northern students aged out of the system and the northern retirees stayed put. Schools were closed in north DeKalb and opened in south DeKalb. Retirees in north DeKalb moved out and new families moved into the north in the 90s and 2000s. Meanwhile, those south DeKalb students aged out of the system and the south DeKalb retirees stayed put. We now found we needed quite a bit of that “vacant” property in the north. We now have vacant property in the south. What will we need when those south retirees move out and new families move into south DeKalb? We don’t need all that property now, but we have to be careful about selling off all vacant property only to have to buy it back in the future when the cyclical influx of students comes. How do you equalize this out in a system as geographically large as DeKalb from North to South bisected by three very busy Interstate highways?
Selling off all our vacant property to meet short term debt obligations will be “kicking the can down the road”. This has happened with our reserves until we alone among all school systems in the metro area have no reserves.
Dr. Atkinson and the BOE must get this financial house in order. I’m all for providing incentives for older teachers to retire early if we can hire younger and cheaper teachers. But what will this cost us? The state of Georgia severely penalizes teachers who retire with less than 30 years and less than 60 years of age. A teacher can retire on half pay at 25 years, but if he/she is 55, then the penalty will be 35% of their retirement but for the rest of their life. For example, if a teacher retired with his highest two years as $60,000, ordinarily he would receive $36,000 the rest of his life with a 3% COLA every year. If he elects early retirement at 25 years and he was 55, he would receive $19,500 the rest of his life with a 3% COLA. Since you can’t force teachers to retire and you can’t legally discriminate on the basis of age, exactly what kind of incentive did you have in mind and what obligation would taxpayers be under?
Should we be balancing the budget on the backs of our teachers when we are having such a difficult time getting competent and quality instructors? DeKalb must make it attractive to be a teacher. 40 in a classroom, no Social Security payments (lawsuit still to be decided on the TSA that took the place of Social Security and was eliminated by the past superintendents – Lewis and Tyson), and a decrease in pay to come to a system that has many low income schools and the lowest achievement in the metro area is not really all that attractive. If you don’t attract high quality teachers, then property values decrease even further. Property values are driven in large part by the schools in metro Atlanta. Perhaps that’s not so in Florida.
Demographically comparable school systems have much less ancillary employees as a percentage of personnel. They don’t have the special programs, schools and centers DeKalb has. Their compensation in the non teaching areas is less than our system. A compensation audit in 2004 (never followed even though this audit done by Ernst and Young showed at that time DeKalb was overpaying 2,500 non teaching personnel by $15,000,000 a year) and the most recent compensation audit showed the same situation.
A lot of your ideas have merit, but this is a very complex situation. Dr. Lewis and Ms. Tyson used simplistic methods to balance the budget – eliminate the teachers’ TSA and increase class sizes while leaving the non teaching force intact at the same pay as well as protecting the special programs and schools. Look where an absence of deep critical thinking skills and a hard look at the future of the economy of DeKalb got us. It got us into this mess.
Loving Life!
May 26th, 2012
8:49 pm
@@Loving Life!
“DeKalb does not have an elementary school named Tinsley.”
*LOL it was Tilson ES sorry I was typing in a hurry!
“Is this legal in Georgia? Can you redirect tax money meant for capital improvement into annual personnel salaries…”
*The district would have to take out bonds to meet its budget and then pay off the differed debt with the SPLOST revenue. DeKalb would need to hold another referendum to uphold the previous needs addressed in SPLOST IV. From the link you provided: “If the resolution calls for the issuance of general obligation debt in the form of bonds, it must also include the principal amount of the debt, the purpose for which the debt is being issued, the identity of the local government issuing the debt, the maximum interest rate or rates applicable to the debt, and the amount of principal to be paid during each year over the life of the debt.”
“Perhaps a bit of history is in order…”
*I do strongly agree with your assertion/history lesson about the aging of populations between the north and south – the need for schools in the north will be reversed in a generation. All of my data is only based on a ten year projected study by DeKalb schools itself. Maybe this study should be extended beyond using historical data to ensure land is retained in areas that show the most potential for growth beyond the ten year study.
“we alone among all school systems in the metro area have no reserves”
*That is very scary that our educational leaders have not made provisions for budget shortfalls as this is a commonality in the world of public education as all costs are rising (ie construction, transportation, textbooks, etc) but the support for education is not proportionate.
“competent and quality instructors? DeKalb must make it attractive to be a teacher. 40 in a classroom”
*During my time in Florida several schools operated on “tract scheduling” where at no time during the year where 100% of the schools enrollment on campus at the same time – only up to 3/4. For example, Dunwoody HS has a captivity of 1,242 students with an enrollment of 1,491 student yielding a utilization of 120%. If it were to utilize “tract scheduling” where freshman have the fall quarter off, sophomores have the winter quarter off, junior have the spring quarter off, and senior have the summer quarter off it would decrease utilization to 90% allowing room for growth of 500 students. If implimented at all SC1 HS (including Chamblee and Cross Keys) this would push the need for a new HS past 2015 closer to 2020/2021. However, the EOCTs and other state tests are not administered on the same flexible schedules as the FCATs so this idea maybe null.
“never followed even though this audit done by Ernst and Young showed at that time DeKalb was overpaying 2,500 non teaching personnel by $15,000,000 a year”
*Someone needs to get the current administration this report because large scale reductions are in order in the district. Many people do not like to hear the word “outsourcing” but some companies such as Leona Group, L.L.C. and Kelly Educational Staffing specialize in the area of k12 educational settings and could be a cost effective measure to lessen the payroll greatly by outsourcing a large percentage (if not all) non-instructional and school leader staffing.
Again these are just talking points, the district needs to do in-depth studies and get the community involved in this state of emergency. This are complex issues that require unique solutions as there are now other districts to my knowledge that have survived a shortfall this great without mass firings. I do wish the district would allow parents to have a greater hand in their child’s education (ie conversion to a charter school district or better a district of charter schools) which will result in better stewardship of the district as the administration will have all eyes on its every move.
yes i am worried
May 26th, 2012
9:15 pm
SPLOST funds and the projects associated with them are really unrelated to our immediate needs (with the exception of being able to close schools.)
DeKalb has had a half dozen committees and blue ribbon task forces over the last 20 years. Almost without exception, the work of these groups has been hijacked by the members (parents) of the committees who have their own special interests to protect — ie magnet programs, Fernbank Science Center, etc
What we need is strong leadership making difficult and unpopular decisions that will put us where we need to be to face the financial hardships now and the new financial realities coming down the road. Barring a very unlikely change in state funding, it will be forever before DCSS has the kind of revenue that it had even 5 years ago.
My believe is that the property value drop in parts of DeKalb will never recover, at least not for 20 years. We must start living within our means.
@loving Life
May 26th, 2012
10:24 pm
“Someone needs to get the current administration this report because large scale reductions are in order in the district”
The report is missing. Open Records requests failed to produce it. The minutes of the BOE meeting during which Jim Landry, the Ernst and Young consultant gave his summary are missing as well as the summary which should have been an attachment. Taxpayers paid $341,000 to Ernst and Young for this report and yet the Interim Superintendent could not produce it.
http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/2011/02/07/dekalb-school-audit-found-bloated-salaries-then-what/
http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/2011/02/28/despite-the-law-dekalb-school-minutes-vanish-without-a-trace/
$15,000,000 a year 7 years would have yielded $105,000,000 in savings.
Meanwhile SACS does nothing and the DeKalb Board works very hard to protect all those “family and friends” in non teaching positions.
Taxpayers kept pushing until the last Interim superintendent said the BOE would do yet another compensation study. It said much the same thing.
You can see why taxpayers are so angry that Dr. Atkinson is not following the most recent study. Mde ja vue
@loving Life
May 26th, 2012
10:29 pm
“Someone needs to get the current administration this report because large scale reductions are in order in the district”
The report is missing. Open Records requests failed to produce it. The minutes of the BOE meeting during which Jim Landry, the Ernst and Young consultant gave his summary are missing as well as the summary which should have been an attachment. Taxpayers paid $341,000 to Ernst and Young for this report and yet the Interim Superintendent could not produce it.
http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/2011/02/07/dekalb-school-audit-found-bloated-salaries-then-what/
http://www.atlantaunfiltered.com/2011/02/28/despite-the-law-dekalb-school-minutes-vanish-without-a-trace/
$15,000,000 a year in corrected overpayments to 2,500 non teaching staff over 7 years would have yielded $105,000,000 in savings.
Meanwhile SACS does nothing but try to delay any probationary status even after our former superintendent and his second in command were indicted on racketeering charges, and the DeKalb Board works very hard to protect all those “family and friends” in non teaching positions.
Taxpayers kept pushing until the last Interim superintendent said the BOE would do yet another compensation study. It said much the same thing.
You can see why taxpayers are so angry that Dr. Atkinson is not following the most recent study. Deja vu.
If ever a school system needed to be put on probation and the governor needed to appoint another one, this would be the one.
N. GA Teacher
May 26th, 2012
11:47 pm
Several bloggers have tried to (incorrectly) justify low science scores of district students as a reason to eliminate the Fernbank Science Center. Now, it may be that the Center has to be cut, but NOT because of science scores but because of inefficient financial and administrative management at the top. The reason science scores are low, and get lower as the kids get older, is because of two things: first, all subjects have taken a back seat to English and math, the great end-all and do-all of the ill-conceived NCLB; second, much of DeKalb’s student body consists of poverty kids, who lack the home environment that will support any academic endeavor, let alone science. I don’t know the science scores of Fayette or Cobb or North Fulton, but I bet they are higher due to the socioeconomic environment. Also, in high-poverty situations, students attitudes toward education are more negatively heavily influenced in adolescence, the most common of which is “studying and being a nerd ain’t cool”. Hopefully the new super can find ways to right the financial ship without cutting Fernbank.
Teacher Reader
May 27th, 2012
12:23 am
@ N. GA Teacher,
We are a BROKE district. We have no reserves, have outstanding lawsuits that God only knows what they will cost to continue and if we loose how much more money we will end up paying.
Fernbank Science is a great concept, but we really don’t have the money. We need ot be making cuts where ever we can and getting all expenses to the bare bones. It’s like when a financially responsible person is laid off (or at least this is what happened in my home growing up when my dad was laid off), they cut out all unnecessary expenses. They look at each expense and determine if it’s a need or a wants. Wants automatically get stopped. Needs get evaluated and prioritized.
Expenditures in our county need to be drastically cut. We have no money for a rainy day. We have a top heavy administration and central office, and we have programs that are expensive to run that only serve a few students, while many, many more are in over crowded classrooms. This has to stop.
DeKalb is a county of great divide. North vs. South. Black vs. Whites. Those feeling that others have and they have not. Citizens worried about their piece of DeKalb and not the entire picture of the education of the children across the county.
There are ways that we could have the programs at Fernbank without the expense of upkeep on another building and over $1,700,000 for salaries, plus benefits for the support personnel at the Center. Currently Fernbank has 5 Maintenance workers, a head custodian and 3 other custodians, 5 security guards, 1 director, 2 assistant directors, a media specialist, a photographer, a photographer/designer, a scheduler, 2 clerical workers, a bookkeeper, 4 exhibit designers, a general administration, a CTSS (?), support maintenance, a support services person, and technical support, besides the teachers who provide the classes and instruction. This type of administration/support cannot be kept in our current financial state. The salaries for many of these individuals is staggering. The fact that tax payers are footing a bill in excess of $1,700,000 for support for the programs offered by Fernbank shows me that we need to retool the Fernbank Science Center, and get the programs offered into our schools if they are deemed to be a good value for the money spent.
Right now, the citizens of DeKalb need to focus on providing a quality education for ALL children attending school there and to make cuts to programs that are not a good value for the money spent to run the program vs. the number of children receiving benefit and the quality of benefit received. The values of our homes will not raise, until the quality of education rises. This should be the priority and mission of the board of education and the superintendent.
@N Georgia Teacher
May 27th, 2012
7:24 am
” I don’t know the science scores of Fayette or Cobb or North Fulton, but I bet they are higher due to the socioeconomic environment”
That sounds plausible except DCSS does not have the highest poverty in the metro area. Clayton, Rockdale, Atlanta Public, and Marietta City Schools are a few examples of school systems that have a much larger percentage of schools that are Title 1 low income. Contrast DCSS with demographically comparable school systems. Herahistorical a link to the science scores for last year’s CRCT as compared with other metro systems (only Clayton fared worse in science – every school in Clayton is low income while DCSS has less than 70%).
http://dekalbschoolwatch.blogspot.com/2011/06/in-comparing-standardized-test-scores.html
Teachers in the regular schools have less than 50 cents a child for the entire year to spend for equipment and supplies ($50,000 for 95,000 children) while Fernbank Science Center spends almost $500,000 a year for 5 Exhibit Designers and a Cabinetmaker in salary and benefits.
Every suggested cut to the Science Center has been met with opposition by the powerful Fernbank community who helped elect the current BOE chairman. While classes have soared to 35+ in math, science, social studies and language arts, the science center has remained virtually untouched. 28 admin and support in a building that has 28 teachers is not sustainable. The forest is gone, and all that remains is a musty old building with tired exhibits. The building needs millions in repair and updated technology. Where will this money come from?
This mode of science instruction was great in the 1950s when our students needed enrichment since they had mastered the basics, we had a solidly middle class tax base so money was not a problem, and we had cheap gas to transport students to and from the center. This is not the case now.
Good Mother
May 27th, 2012
10:20 am
I like the science center. My kids and I have been there twice….but 4.7 million and seven administrators? Someone is milking the heck out of it. Cut overhead. I’ve beenn to the science center — it is tiny. seven ADMINISTRATORS? It needs ONE at most.
Keep it open — with less overhead.
Dunwoody Mom
May 27th, 2012
11:27 am
Fernbank not only costs about $7 million a year to run, it also needs close to $2 million in renovations as suggested by Facility Assessment reports released last year. If we keep the Center open where is the money going to come from to renovate and upkeep these decades old building? I understand that STT is important to many parents. From what I’ve heard it is a good program. But a good program should be offered in all high schools, not just one building and only serve less than 200 students a year.
My suspicion is that the Fernbank community wants to keep this building open for other reasons than what they claim it provides to the students.
Miss Management
May 27th, 2012
11:43 am
That $4.7 million doesn’t include the transportation costs for the door-to-door service given the STT students. There are other costs as well such as materials and healthcare and other benefits. The total cost really is closer to $7 million.
http://dekalbschoolwatch.wordpress.com/dcss-spending/the-cost-of-fernbank-science-center/
Save FSC
May 27th, 2012
11:53 am
The fallacy here is that the FSC benefits Fernbank community. (BTW price tag is 4.7, not 7 million as per county budget and serves much ,much, more than 200) I don’t live in the area, and I am one of their biggest supporters. I would like to address points brought up:
1. The cost of personnel: There is no doubt that FSC can be re-structured and save money, but at the end of the day these are scientist that work there and are paid accordingly. If we want knowledgeable people teaching our kids than we have to pay for them.
2. Serves a small population: There are programs that can only serve a small group (that is why they are so great) but there are also programs like Exploring Nature with your Child (see youtube links above) that are free for anyone to go to. All you have to do is show up. If people don’t go to them, it is because a) they don’t know about them or b) parents can’t be bothered to go.
3. Renovations: Though upkeep will always be needed the important thing is what they already have: specialized scientific equipment and the people.
Lastly, as a previous poster alluded to, FSC provides scientific social justice. The truth is not all middle schools/high schools provide the same quality of education. This is a chance for talented students from lower performing schools to take high quality classes.
Sadly, that is the real loss there. I hope the board members from these other regions realize this.
bootney farnsworth
May 27th, 2012
12:24 pm
I don’t know if the money is there, but I wonder if its possible to keep it open for six-eight months while they find corporate sponsorship
Teacher Reader
May 27th, 2012
12:32 pm
I ask, what part of we are $73 MILLION dollars in the red do the tax payers not understand?
We have two court cases coming up. One with the teachers and one with the construction company. The teachers are most likely going to win, and how much will we, as tax payers owe them? What will we owe the construction company if they win? Money needs to be in reserves for payouts in these cases, as their dollar amounts are unknowns to the tax payers.
DeKalb has been mismanaged for years. Times were good, so the mismanagement was easy to cover up. Times are lean now, class sizes are out of control, and we can no longer afford our champagne and caviar tastes, as we are on a tap water budget.
@ Save FSC, The truth is, this is the time for a total restructuring of DeKabl to take place, so that ALL students will receive a quality education, and not just those few lucky enough to have their names drawn in a lottery. The focus on DCSS, has to be on improving the quality of education for all students and not just those in the special programs.
Fernbank Neighbor
May 27th, 2012
12:48 pm
Closing FSC would lead to a significant financial liability for DCSD in the form of contracts that must be voided – and penalties paid – because the facility is no longer present to hold the planned activities. These activities actually generate revenue for the center, and furthermore, FSC itself produces small amounts of revenue. Closure is permanent; there is no stepping back. If we close it today, then we will lose the opportunity for CONTINUED investigation into securing non-DCSD funding for FSC. While FSC’s primary purpose has always been to provide exceptional STEM education to all students in DeKalb, it has primarily benefited those who have no other access to this type of education. A centralized, consolidated location for this great resource is necessary to ensure economies of scale and the most efficient use of resources. It is an essential part of our school system’s curriculum, without which, I’m not sure what we will have.
I see who comes and goes from the Science Center every weekend. The parking lot is PACKED for various programs. During the week, buses are in and out, bringing kids to the center. On top of it, personnel are constantly out in the schools doing special science teaching. These curriculum enhancements do not begin to touch on the specialized training given to all science teachers across the county and even from outside the county. Do the finances need to be evaluated? Certainly. The answer, however, is NOT to cut funding today. Doing so would not only (as I mentioned earlier) result in a much smaller cost savings than the line item would indicate; it would also throw away the significant investment already made on behalf of the county in FSC.
Bluntly, the BOE has a fiduciary duty to the citizens of DeKalb not to throw away an investment in the significant and impressive facilities and also to maintain its current level of investment to give FSC the opportunity to thrive and grow.
@Save FSC
May 27th, 2012
1:06 pm
“…..price tag is 4.7, not 7 million as per county budget and serves much ,much, more than 200″
That is the price for personnel compensation. It does not take into account bus transportation to and from the center nor does it take into account facilities cost.
There are 180 students a year (90 a semester) served with STT. This would not go away, just be run from schools where science center personnel could be housed.
Everyone knows 28 admin and support for 28 teachers is totally out of line when we are already packing 35+ into the regular science classes that meet every day and are totally responsible for student achievement in science. It seems much more out of line when we are talking about putting 40 in a science class. Yet NO ONE in the DCSS administration has done anything because the Fernbank community has pulled out all of the stops to make sure FSC remains untouched.
Look at the open letter to the Board the Fernbank Elementary School Council wrote urging neighborhood schools to close but Fernbank Science Center to remain. Marshall Orson, now running for the BOE, signed the letter. You are saying the Fernbank community has nothing to do with the science center. So why did the Fernbank Elementary School Souncil get so involved? A vigorous online campaign was also launched to leave the center virtually untouched while neighborhood schools were closed and students were packed like rats into classrooms where the teachers are charged with ensuring they learn math, science, social studies and language arts.
Here is the letter Marshall Orson signed on behalf of the Fernbank Elementary School Council. Let readers and commenters see how involved the Fernbank community has been in ensuring this center is not touched:
http://dekalbschoolwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/letter-from-fernbank-elementary-school.html
Look how Fernbank Science Center is cited in real estate ads in the community. It has always been an attraction in the center of their community:
http://activerain.com/blogsview/1565165/homes-for-sale-in-the-fernbank-elementary-school-district-atlanta-georgia
http://www.thekingteam.com/dekalb
http://www.pattijunger.com/communities/virginia-highland/
@Fernbank Neighbor
May 27th, 2012
1:15 pm
“Closing FSC would lead to a significant financial liability for DCSD in the form of contracts that must be voided – and penalties paid – because the facility is no longer present to hold the planned activities”
Be specific. What planned activities? I think you are confusing it with Fernbank Museum.
Do you think it is fiscally responsible or educationally sound to have 28 admin and support for 28 teachers and spend $500,000 for five Exhibit Designers and a Cabinetmaker while the regular science classes where science is taught every day has a grand total of $50,000 to spend on equipment and supplies (50 cents per child per year)?
Do you realize that Fernbank Science Center needs $2,000,000 in renovations? Where do you think the money will come from? The center is outdated and has needed renovations for years. With science, you can only continue along the same vein for so long. At some point you need to make a substantial investment in equipment and supplies and update the technology or the quality degrades significantly. The forest is gone so the building is all that remains.
Keep the best of Fernbank Science Center – the teachers – and let the rest go. It is time to move on and look at a way to serve all students in DeKalb in the regular classrooms – goodness knows we need to do this.
yes i am worried
May 27th, 2012
1:21 pm
It is clear that people don’t understand that a contract from a school system means nothing. School systems have all the power and can walk away from a contract from an employee if they are no longer needed. Gwinnett Schools did it a few years ago, in the Fall, when their enrollment was lower than projected.
As to the point of paying the scientists as scientists, are you kidding me? How about paying our teachers what they are worth?
The arrogance of those who seek to protect only the programs they deem as important is mindblowing.
yes i am worried
May 27th, 2012
1:24 pm
Frenbank Neighbor
Every other system in GA doesn’t have a FSC. Excluding Clayton and Atlanta, the minority children in the metro systems out perform our poor and minority children in DeKalb in science. It isn’t working.
In fact, because of FSC, most AP science courses aren’t offered at local high schools, which actually reduces access to FSC.
I suspect you are as worried about what Fernbank Inc might do with the property as you are with education.
Miss Management
May 27th, 2012
1:30 pm
@Dedicated Biologist. Many of us have formed an opinion contrary to yours — and we actually are informed. We just have a different perspective. Fernbank is great, if you are able to take advantage of its programs. But its programs cost the system a lot of money and our regular classrooms and regular teachers have already made enormous sacrifices in these budget cuts. We can’t offer special programs that are very costly and at the same time force regular classrooms to add yet another 2-3 students while simultaneously cutting their teacher’s pay and benefits.
Maybe the Fernbank employees can form a corporation and offer their services to metro Atlanta students for a fee. You know, privatize it… if the demand is there, it will make money. I would imagine that if they pulled from all over metro, they could keep all of the classes full. They could even offer online learning – lots of homeschoolers would happily pay for that. Times have changed. Thinking outside the box is no longer an option. It’s a ‘must do’.
Miss Management
May 27th, 2012
1:33 pm
@SaveFSC; once again, read this blog report on the actual cost of Fernbank Science Center. It’s objective. And it’s thorough.
http://dekalbschoolwatch.wordpress.com/dcss-spending/the-cost-of-fernbank-science-center/
Loving Life!
May 27th, 2012
1:36 pm
@Teacher Reader
OMG – this is the stuff movies are made out of. My heart most sincerely goes out to those parents and students of DeKalb schools who have endured a mafia style school administration that has now left this system with a $79 million shortfall. I hope Crawford Lewis and Pat Reid have the most sever punishment allowed within the law not only from stealing from CHILDREN but as a warning to other district administrators who might be doing the same malevolent activities that have not YET come to light.
I implore the state of Georgia to become more innovative with its schools to boost public confidence and student achievement. Possibly the consolidation of all schools districts into one statewide network (like Hawaii has) into a system of charter schools where the most authority/accountability is placed in the hearts/hands of the Principal at the site level. The Fulton Schools Charter is my dream for education (however, the real test is if it will work in practice). At a state level I do feel that Area Superintendents would not be as useful (ie too much mid-level management) therefore schools should be allowed create shared services networks by clusters (ie each HS would align with feeder MS/ES or k8s to share resources such as busing, communications, and maintenance). The state could set up regional support offices for data/technology, ethics/ombudsman, operations, and pupil personnel/student support services. All schools could be responsible to an independent NON-POLITICAL board elected by internally local school councils. Since this would leave the schools acting as a quasi employee-owned corporation – the Governor’s Office for Student Achieve could be used as a check to serve as the public watchdog and implement a school grading system based on traditional grading scale (A, B, C, D, F, I)
Nevertheless, the replication of Charles R. Drew and KIPP schools across the state might just be a pipedream however, nothing happens unless first a dream…
Miss Management
May 27th, 2012
1:44 pm
Could we divvy up the science equipment and have north/south magnet programs at Arabia and Chamblee? Give each one an electron microscope and split the rest of the equipment and teachers. We could have TWO excellent math/science/high tech magnets in this county within the confines of TWO excellent high schools with no additional travel costs. Also, Arabia has a huge leg up in this as they have access to so many natural resources to explore with outdoor learning. Wasn’t that the stated purpose of the Arabia program? It’s a VERY long drive for students in north DeKalb, so offering a mirror option at Chamblee would be effective.
Then get working on a super wonderful vocational tech school for people who aren’t interested in STEM programs but are interested in preparing for a solid life in the working world. And improve ALL high schools so that students are actually college ready. There are students with ALL ranges of interests and abilities in this county. All of their needs should be met.
Fernbank Neighbor
May 27th, 2012
1:47 pm
@1:15 whoever you are…. no, I am very well aware of the difference between Fernbank Inc., which manages the Fernbank Museum of Natural History among other entities, and Fernbank Science Center. Let’s look at the contracts with Lockheed Martin to provide Aviation Camp. How about with NASA to provide facilities for SEMAA. These are MONEY GENERATING contracts for both FSC and the partnering institution; they will require restitution should they be voided. Just a start there, but there are many more.
yes i am worried
May 27th, 2012
2:17 pm
SEMAA is gone — NASA isn’t funding it anymore. It ends this school year.. The Center will stay open through July 31st end of fiscal year so no problem with hosting the camp.,
Please understand that the money isn’t there this year and certainly won’t be there in the future to operate FSC. What is your solution?
@Fernbank Neighbor
May 27th, 2012
2:57 pm
Yes. Over TWO years ago, Marshall Orson’s and the Fernbank Elementary School Council’s open letter to the Board of Education asking BOE members to leave Fernbank Science Center with no cuts while urging them to:
1. Shutter neighborhood schools
2. Redistrict and consolidate other schools (except no redistricting for Fernbank ES – they fought that successfully as well)
3. Raise taxes (called “revenue enhancements” in the letter
Marshall Orson and the Fernbank Elementary School Council said in very fluent and elevated language:
“At the same time, we believe that Fernbank Science Center is one of the DCSS entities best positioned to seek longer term third party external support, particularly in the absence of any other science museum or center in the close-in Metro Atlanta area.”
In “plain old English”, they said that Fernbank just needed some time to become self sustaining.
Very effective stall tactics. Yet it’s two years later and $10,000,000 (really around $12,000,000 to $14,000,00 million if you count the transportation and facilities cost) of classroom funding directed into this entity, and NOTHING has been done to transition Fernbank Science Center to a non profit.
The top administration at Fernbank may have felt that the powerful Fernbank community would protect them and shield them from all cuts ad infinitum (and that may very well be true). In addition, they probably realize that no non profit would take on as many admin and support (28) as there are teachers (Fernbank’s greatest asset). DCSS has long been a jobs program and this is just as prevalent at Fernbank Science Center – otherwise why would there be as many admin and support as there are teachers, particularly since the teachers are actually in the schools so much of the time?
Past performance (doing nothing to seek funding from the private or public sector to become a non profit organization) is in this case indicative of future gains. Taxpayers and most importantly students cannot afford to wait yet another two years for this cost center to be shifted to the private non profit sector. It didn’t happen when they had all that time to figure this out, that would be another $10,000,000 to $14,000,000 that is sorely needed to close the funding gap.
Mr. Orson’s and the Fernbank Elmentary School Council letter:
http://dekalbschoolwatch.blogspot.com/2010/03/letter-from-fernbank-elementary-school.html
Save FSC
May 27th, 2012
5:59 pm
In response to a few posters:
I apologize for the misunderstanding. Obviously the Fernbank community has an interest in keeping the Science Center, I think there is no arguing the point. The point I was making is that I and many other families that use the Center do not live within the Fernbank neighborhood. I could really care less what Fernbank Inc. does with the property, though I think the less affluent people in Dekalb will suffer for it. My concern is that it is a loss overall, for all county residents. I recognize that they can trim, but losing the Center itself would a travesty for many families.
I think Dekalb School Watch (DSW) has missed the boat on this one. You cannot measure the services, officially and un-offically in terms of raw student numbers. I see FSC as a community service much like the Fire and Police department. I feel strongly that the positive impact FSC has is so great that if anybody, including DSW, feels not enough students are served then they should EXPAND not contract services. I feel that too many parents see public education as daycare and could really care less what they learn as long as they pass that meaningless state test and bring decent grades.
The world has changed and we are competing with talented individuals from around the World, not the US, GA, or Dekalb. Any person from a third world country can learn what our children learn. What truly matters is HOW we think about science and innovative thinking. Unfortunately, this is something that cannot be taught in public schools because of the 1) number of students, 2) US regulations (teach the test), 3) parent/teacher apathy 4) disruptive students, 5) unequal ability in students etc, etc .etc… The list could go on and on.
The idea is that our children, in Dekalb, part of metro Atlanta, the leaders of the southeastern U.S., should and get a superior education if they truly desire it, irregardless of their financial situation. I truly believe that.
Again I do not live in the Fernbank area, and you will not see me throwing money/buying influence simply because I don’t have it. I have been donating my free time and energy to save the Center because I see the big picture and see the positive impact the FSC has on kids. I would like to invite parents and their children to Exploring Nature with Your Child Class to see what I am talking about. If you are interested about the class, I have uploaded videos ( the links are above), somewhere.
I do not have any connection with the Center I am just a supporter.
@Save FSC
May 27th, 2012
7:00 pm
Do you really think Fernbank Science Center needs one admin and support person for every teacher, particularly since the teachers are mainly in the schools teaching? Are you comfortable with $500,000 being spent on five Exhibit Designers and a Cabinetmaker? Does this not seem like an extravagance to you when students in regular science classes are sitting next to as many as 35 or 36 other students.? Please visit some of the schools to see what is happening to our students – particularly the ones in low income schools?
Fernbank Science Center does not want change. They want to continue just the way they always have, but it is not economically feasible anymore. That is the problem. No one wants to change any initiative no matter what the inefficiencies. Just load up the regular education classes with as many students as you possibly can and keep everything the same. This clearly NOT working for kids, and in particular this is not working for kids in low income Title 1 schools. Go and volunteer in some of these low income schools and you will see the need for reasonable class sizes is great. We are consigning so many of them to a very bleak economic future. We cannot raise taxes past this increase by state law. What would you cut so kids have a decent chance of sitting in classes where the teacher can give them some individual attention? Please share your specific ideas.
It is so easy to say don’t cut this and don’t cut that, but the bottom line is basic classes in science, math, social studies, and language arts are too large and something MUST give. How would you trim the budget?
fernbank supporter
May 27th, 2012
7:51 pm
I 100% support science education as a core curriculum in DeKalb County Schools, Fernbank is the key to that. Cutting Fernbank Science Center would affect every single student’s science education in this county. Those of you like DeKalb Mom/Paige must have some agenda.
@fernbank supporter
May 27th, 2012
8:16 pm
“Those of you like DeKalb Mom/Paige must have some agenda.”
Yes. The agenda is improving science achievement in DeKalb Schools.
Look at the 2011 science scores for DeKalb:
Science % FAILED by Grade Level
3rd grade – 30.9%
4th grade – 33.6%
5th grade – 35.2%
6th grade – 42.2%
7th grade – 31.9%
8th grade – 49.9%
Almost half of our 8th graders do not know the most basic concepts in science.
Are you pleased with that?
DCSS can afford to spend close to $500,000 a year for five Fernbank Exhibit Designers and a Cabinetmaker, but we can’t afford over 50 cents a student a year for science equipment and supplies for science instruction in our schools.
Look at the Fernbank Designer salaries – from the 2011 state Salary and Travel audit:
Designer $77,381
Designer $63,360
Designer $84,073
Designer $65,827
Designer $69,178
Total: $359,819
With benefits – $431,782 for five Fernbank Designers.
Cabinetmaker $56,600 a year in salary and benefits
You say you support 100% science education as a core curriculum, but how can that happen with 50 cents a child per year for science education that occurs EVERY DAY in the regular classrooms?
Those are the facts whether you like them or not.
Please go into some of the science classrooms where science is taught every day. These science teachers have the entire burden of science achievement on their shoulders. You cannot be for science instruction as a core curriculum when most science classes have 35+ students and 50 cents a year per child to spend on science equipment and supplies.
Over it
May 27th, 2012
8:17 pm
Comments that imply that the science center staff have resisted change are completely off the mark. The FSC teachers and staff report to LEADERS in the county office, all paid the big bucks, who make all big decisions about how the science center is run. quit blaming the staff. The teachers at the science center are paid according to the same salary schedule as all teachers in the system. Many have advanced degrees (real degrees in an actual science, not a bogus doctorate in education) so are paid a bit more. The staff are not empowered to make decisions about restructuring the science center. The overpaid county office folks should be held accountable for failing to make the center more efficient.
TrishaDishaWarEagle
May 27th, 2012
9:24 pm
High 5 to over it…I loved the bogus doctorate in education remark, My sister-in-law is an educator in a metro Atlanta system, and she recently completed her masters in education course work. Having gone thru the GT MSEE program several years ago, I was , frankly, shocked at what passed for Masters level course work in elementary education…shocked and saddened. (lets just say a lot of the labs required paste and construction paper)
valid questions
May 27th, 2012
9:35 pm
Why would a school system need to employ exhibit designers and cabinet makers?
DeKalb use to be a very affluent county, perhaps the richest in the state. Not now, not at all.
My frustration isn’t with the staff at FSC (though the director, current and past, knew that there were funding issues on the horizon or should have known) but rather with all the people who fought hard to keep it open during the major budget cutting and then did nothing to make it more self sustaining.
Some DeKalb children are suffering because FSC exists. The salaries paid to the designers could cover the salaries of 5 teachers.
I know that everyone sings the praises for FSC, but really, I don’t think it benefits the majority of children. And those are the ones who we need to worry about at this time. Right?
@over it
May 27th, 2012
9:44 pm
No one says the teachers are overpaid. As a matter of fact, looking at the Exhibit Designers’ salaries it seems the teachers are not really paid all that well, especially since they have so much experience teaching students of all levels all over the county and advanced degrees. Any school in DeKalb would be excited to have them as staff members, and the benefits to the students would be incalculable.
Why do you have 28 admin and support personnel for 28 teachers – especially since so many teachers are out in the schools all day? This cannot possibly be justified in today’s economic climate when regular education science teachers are being asked to take on 35+ students in classes.
The center needs restructuring, but the supporters seem to be happy with the status quo. Why are they happy with one admin and support person for every teacher? This is a major drawback of the science center. It has been top heavy with non teaching staff for years and years, and yet the school system continues to fund it as is with few changes.
valid questions
May 27th, 2012
9:53 pm
Is it the loss of instruction that people are worried about or is it the facility? If it is the instruction, as a system, we would be better served to use two or three high schools in the county to house the in class instruction and then disperse the teachers into the elementary and middle schools.
For larger presentations, like the 5th grade health talk, the instructor could meet all the students from one cluster at one school. Much shorter transportation and much more efficient.
The Deal
May 27th, 2012
10:57 pm
I haven’t heard one supporter of FSC acknowledge that it is unbelievably bloated and unbalanced with respect to administrators. Do you really think we can afford this?
No one wants an empty building, but, if the center is such a jewel, then it will be snapped up by a private entity and make money. It isn’t the school system’s job to run a science center for a select few.
As for the programs and good teachers, they can easily be housed in one of the hundreds of schools county-wide.
Save FSC
May 27th, 2012
11:57 pm
@The Deal: Not true. I did recognize that trimming and restructuring is needed in previous posts. That is not the issue though. The issue is to close or not close. My vote is not to close the center.
To the previous concerns about the students in the lower income schools: Please re-read my post. I do address that. To add to my previous reply though, closing the center will not benefit lower income students one bit, nothing. Keeping it open though, gives the opportunity for the talented students to overcome their socio-economic background and get a superior education. I am not saying it is cheap, it isn’t. Having scientist teach students isn’t cheap, just ask any college student.
Teacher Reader
May 28th, 2012
12:33 am
@ Save FSC What part of we need to take at least $73 million from our current budget do you not understand? WE ARE A BROKE SCHOOL SYSTEM!!!!! We cannot afford luxuries. Fernbank Science is a luxury. The scientists can go to our schools and teach, but we cannot afford to keep the building open, transport students for a class, or refurbish the building. It’s not in our budget!!!!
@Save FSC
May 28th, 2012
12:35 am
“Not true. I did recognize that trimming and restructuring is needed in previous posts. That is not the issue though. The issue is to close or not close. My vote is not to close the center.”
The issue is the administrative and support bloat at Fernbank Science Center. No one has ever suggested the Center employs too many science teachers. TWO years ago it was pointed out that FSC had way too many admin and support personnel, but the Fernbank community asked for no cuts and that’s what we got – virtually no cuts. Now there is no forest, no SEMAA . All we have is an outsized admin and support group the size of the teachers who are increasingly in the schools anyway. The main reason it’s protected is the Fernbank community likes it in the middle of their community.
@Save FSC
May 28th, 2012
12:48 am
Please do not use the argument that Fernbank Science Center is good for low income students. Our science scores have declined to the point that half of our 8th graders do not know the most basic science concepts. Most of the decline has occurred in low income Title 1 schools. Almost 4,000 8th graders who do not know the basic facts are struggling in science classes of 35 or more. If you truly cared about the science achievement of these low income 8th graders you would be fighting for decreasing their class sizes by any means necessary. They need high quality daily science instruction by competent teachers in class sizes small enough to receive individual attention as well as access to adequate science equipment and supplies. If closing Fernbank allows us to reduce the classroom size by 1 (and it comes close), then it needs to be done.
Jonathan
May 28th, 2012
8:27 am
DCSS should consider selling the 6 mansions on Ponce, near the Fernbank Museum, the old Briarcliff High School, Avondale Middle School, and other prime realty to pay some bills, since all those places don’t look like they are being used. I would volunteer at the Fernbank Science Center to keep it open. Many of our DCSS students went through there, and learned a lot.
yes i am worried
May 28th, 2012
9:04 am
What six mansions on Ponce? The old Howard School — that is actually in the City of Atlanta and belongs to the City of Atlanta school system, not DCSS.
You are right, the system should get rid of property, but if you haven’t noticed, the real estate market is in the tank. While the system has one or two properties that have retained some value (including the old Briarcliff High School), much of the vacant property is located in areas that aren’t particularly in demand and have plenty of undeveloped or underutilized land currently available.
This is not a short term, get over the hump problem. Two years from now, our revenues won’t be improved, unless the state increases education funding. The decline in the DeKalb property digest is real and most likely fairly permanent. So selling property is a good idea, but a short term one. When the money is gone, it is gone.
Dave
May 28th, 2012
8:48 pm
It isn’t so bad seeing Dekalb County Schools bleeding to death. Public education was a bad idea to begin with and at best only indoctrinates our children into godless liberals with blind allegiance to the so-called “scientific experts.” Someone has to stand up to these un-American godless “experts” who teach hogwash like global warming and evolution. (We saw recently what happened when the un-American Obama “evolves” and wasn’t that an ugly thing!) Glad to see the Science Center on the chopping block. And if the corrupt school board members vote to increase my taxes to avoid such cuts, I for one will appeal.
dekalbite@Dave
May 28th, 2012
10:52 pm
I’m a liberal Democrat with a strong belief in our public school system. Mismanagement is non partisan. Just look at George W. Bush and the Wall Street debacle. Money and power tend to corrupt – no matter what the political persuasion. It is up to voters to educate themselves on the issues and look at the data, emotions aside. I am data driven, and to me it’s all Return on Investment. Our investment in education is our taxes. For those hard earned tax dollars, we expect a return on our investment. That return is student achievement. If this is not happening, then the personnel running the educational system must be held accountable. The superintendents, their upper level management team and the Board of Education members are responsible for student achievement. They set the policies, procedures and programs for the school system, hire the teachers, tell them how and what and when to teach, and make all of the funding decisions. Until we make them responsible for those decisions, we will not see much improvement.
Perdue and now Deal, both conservatives, have kept a bloated and ineffective Department of Education at the same level during the most depressed economy since the Great Depression. It is less about liberal and conservative and more about placing accountability on the people who make the decisions.
Alan
May 29th, 2012
12:23 am
Dave, your comments about science education and public education in general make me wonder what exactly you would like for our children to be taught.
Leaving that aside, I might point out that a millage increase is not the same as a tax increase. Consider an economy in which real estate values are continually on the rise. In such an economy property taxes will go up along with real estate value, and the populace would reasonably expect the school board, and county to reduce millage rates to avoid collecting more revenue than is needed to operate. If the Dekalb school board did not reduce the millage rate when they should have, say ten or fifteen years ago, and instead allowed the system to become bloated with unnecessary positions and unreasonably high salaries, does this mean we should punish the children of today for the adult excesses of yesterday?
Dekalb schools has cut personel each year for the last few years. The staff numbers at Fernbank, though they seem extreme to some here, are greatly reduced from what they were five years ago. Maybe the school system has eliminated enough jobs already. Could the budget be balanced by lowering salaries that should never have been as high as they are? If the most valuable employees are the teachers, and if $50,000 is a proper salary for a good teacher, then what about across-the-board cuts in salaries for all school system staff making more than $50,000? I would like to see the board at least crunch the numbers to see if such adjustments in salaries could result in a balanced budget.
@Alan
May 29th, 2012
9:45 am
“Dekalb schools has cut personel each year for the last few years. The staff numbers at Fernbank, though they seem extreme to some here, are greatly reduced from what they were five years ago. ”
Dekalb has almost exclusively cut lower paid schoolhouse personnel. The bulk of the cuts came from Ms. Tyson cutting 200 low paid paraprofessional who worked with children every day. She also cut some CTSSs, the technical personnel who maintain the technology in the schools. She eliminated over 300 teaching positions by simply not filling those positions when teachers left the system. This was on top of Dr. Lewis eliminating 275 teaching positions using the same methodology the year before. We lost 200 paras that worked directly with children, often instructing struggling learners in small groups, and 600 teachers in two years. With Dr. Atkinson proposing even greater class sizes, we will be losing either 200 (class size increase of 2) to 300 MORE teachers (class size increase of 3) next year.
If the class size increases pass, DeKalb will have lost between 800 to 900 teaching positions since 2009. This is UNSUSTAINABLE for students, particularly our low income students. Already we saw a dramatic drop in achievement rates for Title 1 schools when Lewis and Tyson eliminated 600 teaching positions. This is truly balancing the budget on the backs of the students. Students are the ONLY reason the school system exists. DeKalb Schools has lost its focus.
The Superintendent’s Recommendation is to raise the millage rate and in addition, lose 300 more teachers bringing our class sizes to almost 40 per class and saving $14,000,000. But Fernbank Science Center that employs 28 science teachers and 28 admin and support personnel and costs almost $5,000,000 a year would remain untouched. This $5,000,000 figure does not include the cost for transporting students to the center – 3,200 buses a year as children are transported to a science instructor for a one time hour and a half science experience. Nor does it cover the ongoing cost of the facility – utilities, maintenance, etc.
Raising the millage rate will not accomplish what Dr. Atkinson predicts. I had never appealed my house assessment until this past year when the county raised their portion of property taxes by 26% to the point I was paying over $5,000 a year for a very modest home. That’s when I appealed. Not because I could not afford the property taxes, but the increase prompted me look at the tax commissioner’s website, and I saw that most of the homes in my neighborhood had gone down in appraisal value. I hired an appraiser and was shocked by the loss of value to my home. After being turned down on my initial appeal, I went to the Board of Equalization. 19,000 homeowners were doing the same thing. My meeting with the Board of Equalization was less than 10 minutes, they immediately reduced my assessment (and taxes) by 13%, and there was standing room only in the waiting area. Some homeowners were reduced by as much as 40% in appraisal value since no homes on the market in their very expensive subdivision had sold in almost two years. Since the value of my home was actually less than the 13% they gave me, I will be appealing again. Property values are continuing to fall in DeKalb, even in the more affluent sections. The Board of Equalization said many people have been coming back every year as real estate continues to fall. They advised me to return next year. And BTW – once your assessment has been reduced by the Board of Equalization, it cannot rise for 3 years. Do we really want to reach the tipping point where more people feel they must appeal? Appeals are now what is driving revenues down even further.
Raising the millage rate will cause more homeowners to appeal, and this will become a zero net gain or even a loss for DeKalb Schools.
In addition, as BOE member Don McChesney pointed out, the millage rate will be at the highest level that state law allows. There will be NO way to raise revenue for the school system if this happens.
You are not correct. Fernbank has remained virtually untouched during this recession. This year they lost the forest to Fernbank Museum and they lost their NASA funding for their SEMAA program. Fernbank Science Center needs $2,000,000 in facilities renovations. Do we have the money for this? Currently, it is just a musty building with as many admin and support personnel as teachers. House the Fernbank Science Center teachers in schools all over the county and eliminate the admin and support overhead for Fernbank. DCSS should not be a jobs program.
Tiffany
May 29th, 2012
10:10 am
Once again another misinformed blog. FSC costs DCSS .6 of 1 percent of the total budget. Come on people do you really think that money is going to come back to the classrooms. The instructor serve 160,000 students every year. Moreover, every teacher is given the opportunity to sign up for a planetarium show. Other school systems can and often do bring their students to FERNBANK as well for a fee. Come on people are you really going to sit back and let them make DCSS into an APS or Clayton county. We need experts teaching and supporting our teachers in science and math.
Teacher Reader
May 29th, 2012
10:37 am
Tiffany: .6 of 1 percent out of a budget that is at least $73 million dollars in the red (meaning that we are short at least 73 million dollars) is money that we cannot afford to spend. If I took your thinking when my income went down, I’d be in debt up to my eyeballs and unable to afford the mortgage on my home. Your way of thinking is what has DCSS with NO RESERVES, and no real idea of how much exactly we are short. If more home owners appeal their taxes, something that will definitely happen if taxes are raised, we’ll be much more than 73 million short. Who knows how much the pending law suits will cost us, and we don’t have any savings (money in reserve) for these expenses either.
We are already a failing county school system. Have you looked at the test scores across the county? We a few pockets where kids are succeeding, because they are in special schools. However, the majority of children in DeKalb are in over crowded classes. These kids won’t succeed until we focus on lowering their class size and meeting their needs.
A million here. A million there. It all adds up!!! So yes, .6 of 1 percent of a budget is a small amount, but making those kinds of cuts several times over is what is currently needed to dig ourselves out of the debt that we are currently in.
Dave
May 29th, 2012
11:18 am
@@Alan
$5000 in property tax for a modest home? Whoever you are, are you sure your modest home isn’t within the city of Decatur, where school taxes really are the highest in the metro area?
And I am right about cuts at Fernbank. They have reduced staff by at least five in the last few years. I believe the staff was reduced by ten positions one year, so while the system as a whole may have bloated during the last decade, the science center staff has actually gotten smaller.
Are you saying that appeals drive down realestate value? That’s an interesting theory. And what about all those high salaries at Dekalb? Are you at least interested in seeing them reduced to market levels? It sounds to me like what interests you most of all is closing Fernbank Science Center. What is that all about?
Alan
The Deal
May 29th, 2012
11:52 am
@Tiffany, the proportion of FSC to the total budget isn’t the issue. It’s how much of our DEFICIT it represents, which is close to 10%, and that is a chunk of change.
The bottom line is that FSC has been protected and bloated for years. We are in a crisis like no other, and cutting FSC should be preferred over other options that directly affect every school’s classroom. No one wants to bomb FSC, just turn it over to someone else who will do a better job with it and ultimately make it a more valuable place. A school system that cannot manage its most basic purpose, educating students, should not be running a science center.
Center YES!
May 30th, 2012
1:18 am
The Science Center and the Museum are NOT the same thing. The Science Center actually does real science and not entertainment science. It is one of the few places where everyone can go and see how their tax dollars are being spent and get use out of them even if you do not have a child in school. The Center hosts affordable events for master gardeners, Girl and Boy Scouts, college classes and has the area’s largest telescope. We have the Science Center because a group of dedicated educators, parents, county residents and school board members worked together to create a place to come and learn about science in a cross disciplinary setting approximately 40 yrs ago. This kind of initiative is what made DeKalb County Schools some of the best at the time and turned out astronauts that wanted to give back to their community not mention many others. The dedicated educators there now are still doing those same things. We currently have a shuttle commander who is connected to the Science Center. I wonder how many of you can trace your love of science back to the Science Center? It was here before SciTrek or the Fernbank Museum or Tellus (wonderful job filling the void of a physical learning left by Scitrek) or the Gwinnett Environmental Heritage Center. OK we don’t all love science but we all benefit from the new ideas coming from those who do love science and we sometimes forget that some things we do love really are science (cooking, gardening, photography, bird watching, honoring the Tuskeegee airmen, honoring women scientists and leaders, taking time to enjoy the night sky, robots, watching coins spiral down to the bottom of a cone).
@Center Yes
May 30th, 2012
9:20 pm
“The Science Center and the Museum are NOT the same thing. The Science Center actually does real science and not entertainment science. ”
Meanwhile half (49%) of our 8th graders do not know the most basic science concepts.
Crushed
June 2nd, 2012
8:02 pm
I was currently accepted into one of the Fernbank’s programs and it’s sad to say due to budget cuts I may not be able to do what I’ve been dreaming about all year