Court rules against Ashley Payne in Facebook case. But more to come.

One of the Facebook photos that a "parent" complained about in an anonymous e-mail

One of the Facebook photos that a "parent" complained about in an anonymous e-mail

A Superior Court judge ruled against ex Barrow County teacher Ashley Payne, who resigned in 2009 after an anonymous e-mail was sent to the district complaining about her Facebook page. The case garnered international attention because of the role of the popular social media site in costing the young teacher her job.

Barrow had argued that Payne’s “writ of mandamus” — a judicial remedy to compel compel the system to restore her job –  should be dismissed for several reasons. Among them: Payne’s contract had already expired so her request to initiate Fair Dismissal Proceedings was void.

“The judge did grant Barrow’s motion for summary judgment on the mandamus claim, indicating that for technical reasons, mandamus is not available. However, all the other claims we made in our amended complaint are still pending,” said Payne Monday night in an e-mail.

The court decision was not unexpected by Payne and her attorney Richard Storrs given the time delays in getting their day in court. Storrs said Monday night that he filed an amended complaint with other claims.

After so much time, Storrs said getting back Payne’s job was unlikely so he is now seeking monetary damages, arguing that she was deprived of her property rights without due process because Barrow pressured her to resign by misrepresenting that a parent had complained even though the district had no idea of the source of the e-mail.

The challenge is that Georgia law tends to maintain that if employees resign, even when their hands are forced, it doesn’t equal an involuntary termination.

“Basically, we are claiming that she wasn’t told her rights to a statutory hearing, that the basic premise of what was going on was misrepresented to her, that it was a complaint by a parent when they didn’t have the information,” said Storrs.

Now in graduate school at the University of Georgia, Payne was called in by the principal three years ago after an alleged unnamed and still unknown “parent” e-mailed the superintendent complaining about standard travel shots of Payne on her Facebook page showing her in European beer gardens and cafes. Of 700 vacation photos, 10 had alcohol in them. The e-mail alleged that a student had seen the Facebook page somehow. (I tried to e-mail the “parent” myself, and the address did not exist any longer. Barrow told me at the time that it was not incumbent on the district to verify the e-mail or trace it since Payne resigned. I still remain certain that the e-mail, which was never traced, came from a miffed co-worker. And you can read why here.)

On her Facebook page, which was set to the highest privacy levels and limited to Payne’s adult friends, Payne also posted that she was headed out to play Crazy Bitch Bingo, a popular game played weekly at an Atlanta restaurant.

The trip photos and the comment led her principal to call in Payne and tell her that she could resign or he would refer her case to the Professional Standards Commission and she would possibly lose her teaching license. The principal suggested to Payne that resignation was a safer option for her, according to the written statement provided to me by Barrow County schools at the time. In a panic, Payne said she resigned, which is what has limited her legal recourse today.

(In 2009, I talked to the head of the PSC, the state’s governing body over teacher conduct. He told me his office would not have responded to an anonymous e-mail.)

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog


63 comments Add your comment

To *GoodMother* from Lori C

October 11th, 2011
9:08 pm

I guess your right I’m completely naive, working in IT security for 20 years does that to a person. We become jaded and think you can trust people. Purposely taking someone’s photo and sending it to their boss with a whining email is shoving a knife in someone’s back when your settings are set to FRIENDS ONLY. That means that a “FRIEND” copied the photo, saved it to their hard drive, opened up the email of choice, wrote the email, inserted the photo and sent. So…having said that…a *FRIEND* did it. I am naive in what I wrote, I guess if being naive means that I trust my friends, then yes, I am naive.

My question to Barrow BOE is this….did you pull the headers from the email? Did you track the IP address to find out where it came from? Did the BOE’s IT department do anything to find out who sent the email? Better yet, was the email complete with headers turned over to anyone who could trace it. Everyone has the right to face their accuser, unless any of this was done, she was denied that right.

Thank you “Goodmother” for reminding me not to trust anyone, including friends. Somehow after 48 years I forgot that lesson.

[...] In 2009 someone sent an anonymous e-mail to the school district in Barrow County, Georgia, USA complaining about the Facebook page of teacher Ashley Payne. The teacher’s Facebook page showed her drinking while on a trip to Europe. One news report states that out of more than 700 photos, approximately 10 showed alcohol. [...]

Erin

October 12th, 2011
10:51 am

The link to the post about why you think the email came from a teacher doesn’t work, Maureen. Thought I’d alert you!

Maureen Downey

October 12th, 2011
10:55 am

erin

October 12th, 2011
10:58 am

post rule

October 12th, 2011
1:55 pm

if you work for the school system or government of any type, never post pictures on facebook, comments, etc. — the gestapo is watching and will find a way to fire you.

To Lor C from Good Mother

October 12th, 2011
3:35 pm

You trust a social medial website to keep your private information private AND you work in IT security?

Not only are you naive, you’re incompetent. The Pentagon’s computers get hacked for goodness sake and banks everywhere get hacked into…well, no wonder, because we have people like you working in IT security. You need to be careful, Lori C, and cautious. Identity theft is real.

What is at issue here is not trust, Lori. It’s stupidity.

Anyone who puts their private life on Facebook and expects it to remain private is just plain stupid.

Professionals and people with an ounce of decorum and discretion don’t broadcast their private lives on the world wide web.

mike

October 12th, 2011
4:00 pm

I heard her district said that teachers can not put anything on their social media sites that students are not allowed to do….so what if she were driving a car and one of her students were 15? What if. There was a picture of her teaching her students are definately not allowed to do that?

BCteacher

October 12th, 2011
4:04 pm

@mike

I work in the district – that has never been said.

DoubleDuty-Mom&educator

October 12th, 2011
11:25 pm

I am the mother of a very happy energetic 8 ½ year old boy. My son is currently in the third grade and he seems to be struggling in some very important areas. This is a total shock considering some of his accomplishments thus far in his educational career. I am very concerned about the required test during his third grade experience. There is entirely to much time spent on assessing children on skills that they have not totally mastered or on skills that they may not have had enough time or experiences to master.
After recently attending a conference concerning my child, I was devastated to hear about his progress. In less than two weeks , he’s being assessed again. I do not understand the reasoning behind all of these assessments. What is the data being used for? What, so teachers can go back and reteach? How much time do they have for that with such a rigorous timeline to get standards in before benchmarks? Are you using the data to identify weak and strong educators? Is that data being used to continuously confirm, achievement gaps. Please explain how these assessments are benefitting my child today. My son use to be excited and motivated about learning, today he seems a little stressed and less enthusiastic about his experiences. That is not something that should be coming from a third grade student. I want my son to enjoy the learning process; he needs time to learn from his mistakes. He needs time to recognize and critically think things through. I am really affraid that my son may not be prepared. Basically, I am trying to figure out a way to say that I do not want my child participating in so many assesments. Should I inform the district where I live and teach of my concerns? Should I just go with it? Please advise.

Soon to be Teacher

October 14th, 2011
5:48 pm

I really don’t see how this case wasn’t thrown out because the student had no rights to view this photo because her privacy settings didn’t allow minors to view her profile. I understand that its possible he randomly walked by while his mother was facebook stalking his teacher but that would have been an invasion of privacy for anyone that isn’t a friend or isn’t an adult to see her page.

As a college student, this parent is an idiot. If she is afraid a picture of a teacher drinking alcohol is going to harm her baby’s perceptions of the world, she better wrap him in a bubble and never let him go to college. If anything its good for students to see things like that so when they get to college they don’t go crazy and end up putting themselves in bad situations. This is the problem with the youth of today, we are sheltered like CRAZY!

Soon to be Teacher

October 14th, 2011
5:55 pm

Dear doubleduty,
A lot of these assessments come from Bush’s ‘No child left behind’ policy and schools are also trying to make sure a student does not have gaps in his learning process. If there is a Gap standardized testing will result in below standard scores and damage teachers, administrators, and school boards reputation. The best thing you can do is start a petition and if you can get more than 50% of student bodies parents to sign or possibly the PTA you maybe could make a difference. Otherwise, the best thing you can do is homeschool your child or put him in private school where you are more comfortable with the teaching and testing practices.

Nicole C.

July 19th, 2012
3:09 pm

Any update on this case? Did the court ever rule on monetary damages?