A new report finds high school achievement lagging in many states, including Georgia.
While state test scores have increased in high schools, as they have done in elementary and middle schools, the Center on Education Policy found that high school students show less progress than students at the other two levels. Gaps between groups of high school students have widened at the advanced achievement level in many states, including Georgia, one of a dozen states with a drop in students scoring at the advanced level in math.
(Before we put all the blame on the new math approach in Georgia high schools, please note that the period studied was 2004 to 2009. Georgia introduced its controversial integrated math – math taught using a multidisciplinary approach that draws on concepts taught in algebra, geometry and statistics simultaneously to solve problems — in high schools in 2008-2009 with that year’s entering freshman class. Those students also were exposed to integrated math as sixth graders in the 2005-2006 school year.)
The report states: Georgia is one of 12 states with declines in the percentage of high school students scoring at the advanced level on state math tests. (Georgia introduced a new high school English language arts test in 2008, so trends in this subject are not available.) The percentage of white and African American students scoring at the advanced level in high school math decreased from 2004 to 2009, while the percentage of Latino students scoring advanced increased. The gap between African American and white students widened at the advanced level in high school math, while the gap between Latino and white students narrowed. (You can download the Georgia info and chart from the main page of the Center.)
According to the official release:
While high school scores on state English language arts and math tests have risen since 2002 in most states, new data show smaller proportions of states making gains in high school compared with 4th and 8th grades. The data, published in the Center on Education Policy’s new report, also show a striking lack of progress and widening gaps at the advanced level in many states.
CEP’s report, State Test Score Trends Through 2008-09, Part 5: Progress Lags in High School, Especially for Advanced Achievers, is based on state test results from 40 states and the District of Columbia. States were included if they had at least three consecutive years of test data through school year 2008-09 for the high school grade assessed for the No Child Left Behind Act, generally grade 10 or 11.
High school students in more than three-fourths of the states analyzed made gains in average test scores and percentages of students scoring proficient, the study found. But compared with grades 4 and 8, a smaller share of states made gains and a larger share showed declines. In addition, high school gains tended to be smaller than gains in grades 4 and 8.
“These trends show that progress in raising achievement is lagging in high school, so these students may not be adequately prepared for life after graduation,” said Jennifer McMurrer, CEP research associate and co-author of the study. “The data can’t tell us why, but we can speculate about contributing factors, such as institutions and instruction that aren’t meeting the needs of high school students, low student motivation, and fewer resources for remediation at high school compared with the earlier grades.”
The study also reveals a lack of progress among high school students at the advanced achievement level. Although the percentage of high school students reaching the advanced level has increased since 2002 in a majority of the states analyzed, one-third or more of these states showed declines at the advanced level for high school students. Declines at this level were more prevalent at high school than at grades 4 and 8.
Progress has also lagged at the advanced level for major groups of high school students, including racial/ethnic minority students, low-income students, and boys and girls. In a large majority of the states analyzed, all of these groups made gains in both average test scores and percentages scoring proficient. But fewer states posted gains for subgroups at the advanced performance level. In English language arts, the percentage of students reaching the advanced level declined in one-third to one-half of the states analyzed for all groups except Asian Americans.
“We’re not sure what’s behind these troubling declines at the advanced level,” said Nancy Kober, CEP consultant and co-author of the study. “Clearly, some students aren’t taking challenging courses like algebra and geometry early enough. High achievers may also be getting less attention amid the intense focus on bringing students to proficiency. It’s also possible that they are more motivated to score well on the SAT or AP tests, which have more impact on their future, than on state tests.”
Moreover, achievement gaps have often widened at the advanced level in high school, in contrast to a broad trend of narrowing gaps for high school students at the proficient level and in average test scores. Gaps in the percentage of high school students reaching the advanced level widened more often than they narrowed, especially in math. The African American-white gap in advanced high school achievement widened in two-thirds of the states analyzed, and the Latino-white gap widened in three-fifths of these states.
“These trends show a need to rethink high school education,” said Jack Jennings, CEP’s president and CEO. “The adoption by 44 states of common academic standards for high schools affords us the opportunity to do that.”
–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog
103 comments Add your comment
AMD
October 11th, 2011
12:06 pm
@Attentive Parent,
No, my mentioning of political reference was not directed at you. Someone else before you went crazy over my reference linking the Chicago crowd (Arne Duncan, Obama, etc.) with EM.
————————
“A good number of US students still get Gold medals at the International Math/Physics Olympiads.”
@thomas,
Your above statement makes as much sense as a college coach in China saying that Chinese college basketball players are of the world class caliber and then attributes their success to some rather low quality basketball program in China. The fitictious Chinese coach in my example conveniently leaves out the fact that all his players are imported from the U.S., with many being the children of NBA players. Let’s look at the fact.
The ultimate math competition for middle schoolers in the U.S. is the annual Raytheon MathCounts Competition. Just look at the last names of the national finalists. Can you honestly tell me these students are educated by our incompetent middle school math teachers? If you think so, you are either clueless or just want credit for something that is not yours. These students are the children of a special group of immigrants, the top-notch science, math and engineering brains from China.
Let’s face it. The math education in the U.S. is subpar. According to the 2009 PISA, the U.S. ranked 25th out of 34 countries. I don’t blame our teachers for every one of our student’s academic underperformance. However, for math, I will squarely pin the blame on our incompetent teachers. Of course, I understand why our math teachers are so incompetent. That’s because the majority of our math teachers come from college graduates who major in education instead of a more math-minded subject like science, math, physics, chemistry, engineering, etc.
I hope you are a competent math teacher. But for some odd reason, I don’t feel you are. Why didn’t you keep asking me to show you the divisibility rule after I had so clearly shown the math reasoning associated with the number 9. Do I need to show you some math models I do for revenue enhancement for a big corporation? I don’t think arguing over words is part of math.
Raytheon MathCounts 2009 National Competition
https://mathcounts.org/Page.aspx?pid=1336
Raytheon MathCounts 2010 National Competition
https://mathcounts.org/Document.Doc?id=520
2009 National Finalists
Rank Name State
1 Bobby Shen TX
2 David Yang CA
S Maximilian Schindler MO
S Alan Zhou MA
Q Calvin Deng NC
Q Mark Sellke IN
Q Ray Li PA
Q Steven Chen TX
P Anya Katsevich FL
P Victor Wang MO
P John Zhang WA
P Alexander Clifton NJ
AMD
October 11th, 2011
12:19 pm
Submitted too quick. Sorry for the bad grammar.
“Why didn’t you keep asking me to show you the divisibility rule after I had so clearly shown the math reasoning associated with the number 9.”
One sentence in my comment above should read:
“Why did you keep asking me to show you the divisibility rule after I had so clearly shown math reasoning associated with number 9 and multiples of 9.”
Also, I just looked at the 2009 MathCounts national finalists again. None of them is a typical public school students. Alexandar Clifton was homeschooled – he was probably taught with Singapore Math or something of that standard. Everyone else gets more than mere math curriculum in the U.S. Let’s grab the credit that does not belong to our math education.
thomas
October 11th, 2011
12:57 pm
Your way of reading the results of the international studies suffers from the lies of averages. Late G. Bracey and others have looked at those results much more carefully, and the fact the US average is mediocre does not mean all schools in the US are mediocre. In fact, in the original TIMSS, there was a consortium of schools in Chicago area that participated in the study as a “nation,” and they were ranked #1 (or very close).
“Why didn’t you keep asking me to show you the divisibility rule after I had so clearly shown the math reasoning associated with the number 9″ The fact that you call what you showed as “reasoning” makes me laugh. You simply stated a rule, which you could have just heard from someone, and simply demonstrated how it works. There was no “reasoning” involved. The fact that you can’t distinguish reasoning from simply demonstrating a rule convinces me that you don’t understand mathematics. Go ahead and look up a proof why the divisibility rule for 9 actually work. Then, tell me how that might be generalized if we have a base-8 number system. Don’t worry about showing any complicated economic model. Just show us you can prove this simply divisibility rule for 9.