Readers: No racial component to doubts about DeKalb school chief

I have been getting an earful from readers unhappy with a column I wrote on DeKalb’s divisive search for a new school chief. (I also received some responses in agreement.)

Here is an excerpt of my column. Below are some critical responses shared with the writers’ permission:

Unfortunately, the debate over whether Atkinson is the right choice has assumed the racial overtones that mar most discussions about schools in DeKalb, a county whose rich diversity often becomes a point of strife rather than strength.

Atkinson is black. An earlier white female candidate —perceived to have the endorsement of many north DeKalb parents — withdrew in the midst of contract negotiations. A Texas candidate favored by some board members was Hispanic.

Many questions about Atkinson’s qualifications come from white parents and board members in north DeKalb, while her staunchest support seems to be with black parents and board members in the south.

The intense public focus on Atkinson stems, in part, from the risky belief that DeKalb’s new school chief represents the system’s last hope, that she swoops in as a savior to rescue the schools from lethargy and apathy. (That hope also reflects the despair with which many DeKalb residents view their school board.)

DeKalb would be better off if it accepted that no single person will end the apathy and lethargy in its schools. Rather than measuring her for a superhero cape, Atkinson ought to be assessed on her ability to set a higher tone and expectations, hire and inspire good people and impose and enforce accountability.

Turning around DeKalb County schools will take the collective commitment and effort of every principal, teacher and parent, and it will not happen overnight. At times, it will take the willingness of DeKalb parents of means and influence — whether on the north or south ends of the county — to recognize that giving their own child an edge is not always as important as giving all children a chance.

The divisions among DeKalb parents reflect income as much as race, said David Schutten, president of the Organization of DeKalb Educators.

“I see the dividing line of I-285 with Columbia, Towers and McNair high schools struggling on one side, and M.L. King, Southwest Dekalb, Arabia Mountain and Miller Grove high schools, which don’t have those same struggles, on the other side, ” he said.

What connects most of DeKalb’s middle-income parents, said Schutten, “is they don’t understand how much more exposure their kids have to daily learning in their homes compared to low-income kids and how much these kids need.  “People can come together across differences if they will sit down and listen to each other and not talk at each other.”

Here are the criticisms, starting with parent Calvin Sims:

“I am a black parent in south DeKalb, and I have raised concerns about Dr. Atkinson’s record, and so have other black parents. The Lorain, Ohio, school district where Dr. Atkinson has served four years as superintendent has had no marked improvement, according to the record. The district is now on Academic Watch, one level from Academic Emergency. The district met only 1 of 26 state indicators (writing), and the district also did not meet Adequate Yearly Progress. Thirteen hundred DeKalb Students requested transfer’s this year as a result of 22 schools failing to make AYP. Therefore, is there a rational basis for the DeKalb School Board selecting Dr. Atkinson as Superintendent? No.

DeKalb School Board members Nancy Jester and Donald E. McChesney were right to bring out the facts regarding the Lorain, Ohio, district. The public had the right to know, and we must know the facts to properly influence the political process in the interest of good education in a Democratic society. Honestly, if the DeKalb school board is genuinely concerned about significantly improving the quality of education for the children of DeKalb (and I believe they are), then they will act rationally and look further for an exceptional superintendent. Our children deserve nothing less.

And retired educator Maria C. Pico said:

I retired last year after 29 years as a high school and middle teacher with DeKalb and after reading your recent opinion piece wanted to chime in.  Let me also say that as well as raising children of my own during my career I taught at both south side failing schools and north schools which had the highest scores in the system so I come with a perspective few have.

For you to suggest that typos in a job application or doctoral dissertation are unimportant for someone assuming the top leadership position in a major metro school system is really absurd and then to imply that the whole thing is racially motivated makes me think perhaps you need to do a little field work to get a reality check. You should go to the DCSS website and sign up to substitute teach so that you too can experience much of the the sub par mediocrity in leadership I was forced to work with for the last two of my nearly three decades in that bureaucracy.

I applaud the parents and board members who are asking questions about the selection of Atkinson and her inability to lead.  There will be little change for the better in the DCSS until both elected and appointed leaders are selected on the basis of merit, service, outstanding work history, integrity and ethics.

And parent Cortlandt Minnich wrote:

You unfortunately took the bait on race in your “reporting” today.  I have heard this argument so many times it makes me nauseous. The typically DeKalb argument is, as usual, a side-show to hide the complete incompetence of the school system.  I can’t represent all the feelings of the “wealthy, white” segment of the county who oppose Dr. Atkinson; I can only share my own views.  I think that Dr. Atkinson is probably a fine administrator.  Her credentials appear quite good for a superintendent position of some scale. Her credentials do not however portray her as the best choice of any superintendent candidate in the country.  You are patently wrong;  DeKalb desperately needs a superhero right now.  Between the investigation and the interim status, we have been without clear leadership for at least three years.  It is clearly time for a reformer to come and re-make the system.  The majority of the school board is too dysfunctional and entrenched to recognize this fact.

As an example, while the APS interim was charged with seizing an opportunity to clean house, our insider-Interim was apparently charged with keeping DCSS on-track.  So, at the same time the recruiting criteria are understated, we are hiring what appears to be an average candidate.  To make it even more tragic (there is just no other word for it), the contract is generous enough to be nationally competitive and has a long term termination clause.

Please don’t contribute to this ridiculous notion that race has anything to do with the disappointment of a large segment of parents (who are not all white and are not all from the north side).  A portion of this segment of the parent population happens to be accurately represented by Ms. Jester, and Mr. McChesney.  Other portions of this dissatisfied group are poorly represented by their school board members.  Please put on your reporter shoes and visit Dunwoody High School, North Druid Hills, Chamblee Charter High School, and Tucker High.  You will not find the purported majority white, wealthy, North DeKalb student population stereotype that you have been so adeptly sold.  We are a mixed bag of parents who are fighting for our kids to have even an average chance of competing against other successful Georgia districts, the 47 other states with better public schools, private schools, and now students from other countries.  Why would we not demand to get a world-class leader?

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

56 comments Add your comment

MamaH

August 26th, 2011
9:01 am

How the Board, in good conscience, continue with this selection is beyond me. The evidence is there that this individual comes with a lot of baggage, both professionally and personally. The contract seems to be written in a way that she does not lose, even though the students and district does. I say pare down and clean house with the Board first. Have one member be from the State. I think SACS would rather see us continue with the interim (even though she is a major problem as well) and do a search that is open and without prejudices to begin with.

Anonmom

August 26th, 2011
11:09 am

She loses mostly because she doesn’t have much “wiggle room” — the BOE will be able to continue to control her because she can be dismissed pretty easily — compare to the Cox contract–it was a 3 year contract that gave her some security that she could make changes that could seek to turn things around (I’m not saying that I was pro Cox — I’m just trying to point out the difference in the provisions) — I think that the SOP of the DCSS BOE is “control” over the superintendent and by this termination clause (coupled by what I perceived to be ties to New Birth) particular members of the BOE maintain their ability to control the superintendent to prevent necessary changes and to keep her on a “short leash” in the same way they kept Ms. Tyson on a “short leash” and in the same way they ran Dr. Brown off (note the pattern). If the true goal was a turn around and to truly clean up and turn over the system for the true benefit of the children and, ultimately, society, the BOE would bring in a strong “change agent” — but they could have done that 18 months ago and they did not (Mr. Redovian actually tried and could not get vote #5).

Anonymous

August 26th, 2011
12:26 pm

For Mike Jacobs, Linda and anyone else who’s jumping all over a paragraph in the contract requiring a 3/4 vote to terminate “for the convenience of the board” — Jacobs’ posting was deceptively selective. As with all employment contracts worth a grain of salt, the contract at issue contains a section on “Termination for Cause,” and frankly, the “for cause” definitions in the contract are quite loose (e.g., simple “neglect of duty” and the outlined “duties” are many and vary in materiality to the core mission of educating students), and therefore give the Board wider-than-usual latitude in terminating for cause. There is no requirement of a 3/4 majority in order to terminate for cause.

Typically, and I’d have to go back and check her contract, when one is terminated for cause, there is very little or no severance. (And bear in mind, it was seven of the current board members — excluding Edler and Jester — who refused, and in fact never, terminated Crawford Lewis for cause, notwithstanding the compelling evidence that had failed to fulfill his duties and likely had committed myriad crimes. Even when the Board finally terminated him, it was under the “convenience of the board” provision. Nice job, standing up for the students and taxpayers, brave Board!)

Thus, the “for the convenience of the board” termination is simiply the converse of “for cause.” If she gets let go without good reason, she’s entitled to severance. That’s standard. The only thing that is potentially different here from most employment contracts is the 3/4 majority. Given the deep dysfunction, the fact that the Board is a democratically-elected entity, and the arguable lack of ethics among many members, that requirement of a 3/4 majority can be said to be a stabilizing element for school system.

On to the real task of improving all students’ achievement and all schools’ success . . . I just had to put Jacobs’ statements in a more accurate context.

Ernest

August 26th, 2011
1:24 pm

Good post, Anonymous! I reviewed the contract again based on Mike’s email. Specifically, this statement was somewhat misleading, *That makes it difficult to fire a superintendent whose performance is lackluster or, worse, who is acting illegally.* In section 9F, there is a temination for cause clause in the contract. If something is done illegal or as the language states ’seriously prejucidical to the District including but not limited to, neglect of duty, or breach of contract’, the Board would have reason to terminate the superintendent.

For consideration, I got the following from the link,
http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepoliticalsystem/a/Supermajority-Vote.htm

However, the framers of the Constitution also recognized the need for supermajority votes in some cases. In Federalist No. 58, James Madison noted that supermajority votes could serve as a “shield to some particular interests, and another obstacle generally to hasty and partial measures.” Hamilton, too, in Federalist No. 73 highlighted the benefits of requiring a supermajority of each chamber to override a presidential veto. “It establishes a salutary check upon the legislative body,” he wrote, “calculated to guard the community against the effects of faction, precipitancy, or of any impulse unfriendly to the public good, which may happen to influence a majority of that body.”

This is not uncommon or unusual as Mike seems to suggest.

Tony

August 26th, 2011
2:57 pm

As a Dekalb County empolyee, it is refreshing to see the critical analysis of the Board’s selection. I have to agree with the comments of the County Office needing an overhaul and that building level administrators need to take a more pro-active and research based approach to running the school. I think we have to many leaders that have received their degrees and stopped learning. We also have to many “it’s all about me” Administrators, Faculty and Staff members that don’t see how much more effective and efficient the system can be if we did our jobs to the best of our abilities. Having said that some are working to the best of their ability and are the ones that need leave.

I see the system changing if parents and concerned community members continue to look critically at the system’s decisions and the school building leaders. Hopefully, in the next Board election “the People” will choose differently. However, those with the qualifications will need to step up and register.

school observer

August 27th, 2011
6:24 pm

@ Dekalbite.. Are you kidding me??? Administrators in Dekalb do not have the authority to fire a teacher. They can barely hold them accountable for teaching. You should try to non-renew a teacher in Dekalb. Just getting pass that crew in Internal Affairs and Human Resources takes an act of Congress. Ah! but I digress , the real issue is the board and all the friends and relatives that work in Dekalb. Dr. Atkinson said on thing right ” children first”