March madness: Arne Duncan calls for no NCAA tournaments for teams graduating less than half their players. That would include UGA.

Arne Duncan wants college basketball programs to pay more attention to academics (US DOE)

Arne Duncan wants college basketball programs to pay more attention to academics (US DOE)

U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, a former college basketball player, condemned the practice of allowing college basketball teams to compete in NCAA postseason tournaments even if they are graduating less than their student athletes in the program.

And he called the growing graduation gap between white and black players “unconscionable.”

On a media call Thursday, Duncan said the issue was personal. Co-captain of the Harvard basketball team and a first-team Academic All-American, Duncan also played professional basketball in Australia. He grew up playing with guys on Chicago’s Southside, where his mother runs an after-school center. (She still is operating it today.)

“I can’t not speak out on something that I have seen from the time I was a child,” he said.  He recalled playing with athletes on street courts who helped earn their colleges millions of dollars only to be leave school without a degree. Some of those star athletes died early, he said.

“The difference between those who did well and those who did not was whether they received their college degree,” Duncan said.

Duncan wants teams that are not on track to graduate at least half their players — as measured by an academic progress index — to be banned from postseason play. Duncan also wants the allocation of tournament winnings to weigh not only a team’s record on the court, but the academic progress and standing of team members.

He supports the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics’ recommendation that teams must be on track to graduate at least half of their players to participate in postseason play. Duncan said that $179 million in tournament dollars over the last five years went to  colleges that were not on track to graduate half their players. While the NCAA has disputed that figure, Duncan said it doesn’t matter if it is $179 million or $80 million. It’s too much to reward programs for academic failure.

Duncan called for a culture change in the NCAA, saying that only one in 6,000 collegiate teams was banned from postseason play due to academics last year.

Also on the media call was Ben Jealous, president and CEO of the NAACP, and Richard Lapchick, director of the Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sports at the University of Central Florida.

Lapchick is the author of the studies released early this week on grad rates among the NCAA tournament teams, including UGA, which is graduating 100 percent of its white basketball players, but only 30 percent of its African-Americans.

With an overall grad rate among its basketball players of 36 percent, UGA posts one of the worst records, according to the study. Top schools for graduating players are Belmont, Brigham Young, University of Illinois, Notre Dame, Utah State, Villanona, Wofford, Vanderbilt,  Xavier and the University of Arkansas

While he said there’s been progress in the college graduation rates, Lapchick warned of a growing gap between white and black basketball players. While the grad rate is 91 percent for white players, it is 59 for black players, and widening.

While there is a 32 point graduation gap in men’s basketball, the gap is only 7 percent in women’s college basketball, he said

Lapchick said there has to be pressure to force recalcitrant college programs to pay more attention to academics.

“The real madness is that we tolerate coaches who prepare athletes for victory on the court and failure in life,” said Ben Jealous, president and CEO of the NAACP. “There are schools that graduate 100 percent of their black basketball players. It happens because coaches decide to make sure that the young men are prepared for victory in life and not just on the court.”

Duncan said that with so many colleges getting it right, there are no excuses for the 6 to 9 percent that are not, accusing them of “skewed priorities.”

Duncan said money is the key to forcing teams to do better by their athletes. “Follow the money,” he said. “If they were prohibited from participating in tournaments if they couldn’t maintain a minimum of half their students graduating, I absolutely guarantee that in a year you would see these programs dramatically improving their graduation rates.”

Until money is at stake for these college basketball programs, Duncan said, “We’ll continue to get lip service.”

–From Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

64 comments Add your comment

Another view

March 18th, 2011
7:51 am

NOT meant as an ‘example’ for @RIGHT.

Lynx

March 18th, 2011
8:31 am

When I taught at UGA and MSU (Michigan State University), I occasionally had a student-athlete. At MSU, the sophomore hockey player informed me the third week of school that he would not be in class until the final exam due to his practice, weight room, and game schedules (set by the coaches and trainers, not the athlete). When I asked how he expected to complete the requirements, he said he was going to turn pro in the spring anyway so it didn’t matter to him. At UGA, I had a golfer who stopped by to enroll early (student-athletes get to do that) and talk about how he might complete class requirements between trips to Florida, California, Hawaii, and other competitive venues and his daily four to six hours of practice. I said he could do his work by email and web, but he claimed he didn’t have access to either (!) and wondered if his tutor could handle all that for him. Sadly, no. He went on to become the SEC champ that year, and no one ever cared whether he attended class or not.

tim

March 18th, 2011
8:38 am

@RealityBytes >>>> Good for you…..I’m glad that you’re more intelligent, you make more money, you pat yourself on your back, and you can run circles like a dog chasing it’s tail.

Now >>>> Byte this!

[...] tournaments even if they are graduating less than their student athletes in the program.”(more)    Comments (0) Go to main news [...]

Lee

March 18th, 2011
11:32 am

I merely asked for one – just one – academic measure of a significant scale where blacks even remotely approach the achievement of their white counterparts?

All I get is “you’re a racist” comments.

Yeah, so? Still waiting on you to name one example.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@chillywilly re: “@Lee – Here’s one: I think most blacks are smart enough to know that adults shouldn’t have sex with children.”

You mean like this: http://abcnews.go.com/US/gang-rape-charges-18-men-sparks-racial-tensions/story?id=13095476

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

@GNGS, re: “It will be interesting to hear your explanation for terrible SAT scores of rural students.”

For years, the top quartile of rural students were typically the ones who left their rural hometowns and went off to college. Upon graduation, they found that there wasn’t enough career opportunities for them back home so they migrated to metropolitan areas. This resulted in a “brain drain” from the remaining gene pool.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

@Realitybytes, I’m really happy for your success in life. Keeps my tax dollars from having to support you in welfare payments, food stamps, and incarceration.

Since you’re so smart, surely you can comprehend the concept of a normal statistical distribution. Look it up.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Still waiting on that one example…..

Warrior Woman

March 18th, 2011
11:53 am

Of course we should penalize the school if players fail to graduate. Surely we can’t expect student athletes to take responsibility for themselves. (sarcasm off now)

A Conservative Voice

March 18th, 2011
1:22 pm

Maureen, I know you’ve heard this……”you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink”. Well, that’s the way it is with an athletic scholarship……you can’t make someone learn, they have to do it themselves. It’s not the college/univ. fault that they don’t. Does UGA recruit basketball players because of their academic excellence or their skills on the court? You and Arnie are way off on this one and it’s ridiculous to think that college presidents would vote with him…..too much money and prestige at stake. Also, the USDOE and our federal bureauracy should butt out of this……

RealityBytes

March 18th, 2011
3:06 pm

@Lee. It would probably pain you to learn there is a ood chance your tax dollars are taking care of your OWN. The wife has been working like a dog relieving the good ol’ White folk of the state of their custodial rights to their children because they think METH is more important than taking on a job or taking care of their children. Raising them in filth, physically and sexually abusing them. Oh..White folks are a major MESS too. You just don’t receive the press coverage like Blacks do when its negative. But yeah, the white supremacy complex in you will claim those are “isolated incidents”, the wayward few and everything else. Oh we know better. Your denial will NEVER make the TRUTH disappear. Loser

chillywilly

March 18th, 2011
4:06 pm

@Lee – Here’s your “academic measure”. Which one of these perverts is you? Let me guess; the butt naked one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwFr_VcGMKQ

GNGS

March 18th, 2011
4:24 pm

@Lee:
“For years, the top quartile of rural students were typically the ones who left their rural hometowns and went off to college. Upon graduation, they found that there wasn’t enough career opportunities for them back home so they migrated to metropolitan areas. This resulted in a “brain drain” from the remaining gene pool.”

So, according to your logic, people in rural areas are less intelligent than city folks?

pms3

March 19th, 2011
7:40 am

Lee

March 19th, 2011
12:31 pm

@GNGS, no, my “logic” merely changes the distribution. You can obtain census numbers and look at the percentage of college education in the population as a good yardstick. It is much higher for the metro area counties.

Put another way, suppose you had two herds of Kentucky Thoroughbred racehorses. Each year, you take the top 10% of colts from herd B and move them to herd A. Over time, the occurance of top prospects will diminish from herd B and increase for herd A.

What happens then is that the opportunities such as A/P classes are reduced for the rural counties. In our semi-rural high school, there were only two students in my oldest daughter’s class who took every A/P course available. At my youngest daughter’s private school, the A/P participation rate was over 50%.

GNGS

March 20th, 2011
12:31 pm

@Lee,

You has attributed poor showing of SAT in inner city to students being less intelligent. Since rural students are doing poorly in SAT, one would draw the same conclusion using your logic that rural students are less intelligent. You provided an explanation why rural students are less intelligent, but you did not dispute the conclusion that rural students are less intelligent.

Furthermore, since migration to city (or places with more opportunities) started many years ago, following your reasoning, people in rural areas should be less intelligent and people in states with large rural populations should also be less intelligent.

Progress-Index

March 23rd, 2011
9:44 am

[...] March madness: Arne Duncan calls for no NCAA tournaments for teams graduating less than half their p… Duncan wants teams that are not on track to graduate at least half their players — as measured by an academic progress index — to be banned from postseason play. Duncan also wants the allocation of tournament winnings to weigh not only a team’s … Mar 10, 2011 11:58pm [...]