Legislature can’t ignore the HOPE crisis any longer

The cost of graduating a Georgia college will be higher if HOPE is reduced.

The cost of graduating a Georgia college will be higher if HOPE is reduced.

With the HOPE scholarship bleeding money, the Legislature only has two choices to save the popular program. It can either slash the number of HOPE recipients or the amount that each student receives.

Neither will be politically popular, which explains why lawmakers long ignored the gathering storm clouds over HOPE until the winds nearly blew off the roof of the Capitol.

As early as 2003, legislators were warned that the Georgia Lottery would have a hard time keeping up with the two education programs it supports, HOPE and universal pre-k. This fiscal year, the lottery will be short $243 million. By 2012, the shortfall grows to $317 million.

Seven years ago, the state assembled a commission that made recommendations for deep cuts to HOPE, but a better-than-expected haul in lottery proceeds convinced lawmakers that the state could afford to wait to eviscerate HOPE.

So while the 2004 Legislature passed a bill that permitted an eventual phaseout of books and fees if the program’s finances deteriorated further, lawmakers also tacked on an amendment opening the scholarship to part-time private college students.

The annual price tag of that addition at the time was $4.5 million — or the cost of 1,000 HOPE scholarships at the University of Georgia.

The private college provision won legislative approval even though legislators knew that the HOPE scholarship would eventually outpace the lottery funds. The entire history of HOPE reflects expansions by the Georgia General Assembly, including allowing private college students who lost HOPE because of low grades to get a “second chance” to regain it, as given to public college students. The Legislature also expanded HOPE to home-schooled students and to students from unaccredited high schools.

The strain on HOPE resources also comes from the increased high school graduation rate, which is sending more Georgia teens to college. And the bleak economy is sending more Georgians back to school, fueling increases in the HOPE grants, which go to technical school students.

Now, Gov.-elect Nathan Deal and leaders of the House and Senate appear sobered by the dire situation and prepared to make significant changes to the scholarship program, which has helped more than 1.4 million Georgians attend college since 1993. To earn HOPE, high school students have to have a 3.0 grade-point average. To keep it once in college, they have to maintain a 3.0 GPA.

Many ideas on how to cut costs — and hopefully irk the fewest number of voters — are under discussion by lawmakers. All have drawbacks and will draw howls of protest.

The simplest idea is to raise the threshold to qualify for HOPE so fewer scholarships are awarded. Perhaps, students would have to have a 3.2 GPA to earn HOPE in high school and keep it in college.

There’s already quibbling from people who contend that the GPA requirement should be calibrated to match the rigor of the major. So, students in engineering or math may only have to keep a 2.75 GPA, while English majors might be held to a 3.5 GPA average. Otherwise, students might shun the science, math and engineering degrees that are desperately needed in Georgia because those majors are often the most grueling.

Another idea is to reduce the HOPE award so it only pays for 80 percent or 75 percent of college costs. That would be politically more palatable, as it wouldn’t entail cutting the number of HOPE recipients.

But it dulls the shine of the scholarship, which flourished on a simple and accessible concept: Graduate with a B average from high school and go to a public college or university for absolutely free.

“Nearly free” or “at a discounted rate” don’t have the same panache.

A prominent DeKalb lawmaker recommends incorporating a minimum SAT/ACT score to qualify for HOPE. State Rep. Fran Millar, R-Dunwoody, said tightening the eligibility will eliminate the number of HOPE scholars in remedial classes.

In the fall of 2009, Millar said 10.4 percent of the University System of Georgia’s incoming freshmen students in remediation were getting HOPE. He argued that low SAT scores are a good indicator that a student will struggle in college. Millar cited state data showing that 3,465 public college freshmen with SAT scores under 1000 arrived on campus with HOPE in 2008. A year later, only 1,982 of these students returned to a Georgia public college.

No one likes my money-saving idea — once students lose HOPE in college, they can’t regain it. Parents tell me about their son’s killer semester at Tech or their daughter’s bad spell at UGA and argue that students deserve a second chance at HOPE.

I counter that students need to learn that sometimes there are no second chances. Otherwise, students may be forced to learn another tough lesson: There are no free lunches or tuition anymore, either.

–By Maureen Downey, for the AJC Get Schooled blog

175 comments Add your comment

More Republican Garbage

December 27th, 2010
4:39 pm

While changes need to be made, the Legislature needs to step in and put a stop to the obscene bonuses the Lottery Commission head and employees get each year also. They need to make sure that the HOPE is available for ALL Georgia students and not just the kids of the rich and famous also.

d

December 27th, 2010
4:39 pm

Frankly, I think the DOE needs to look at a state-wide rule redefining the grading scale. Personally, I believe 90 is too low to be considered an “A” and 80 is too low to be a “B.” Perhaps if we looked at a state-wide rule either saying you must have an 86 cumulative average or go to say a 93-100 = A, 84-92=B, 75-83=C and 70-74 = D. We can leave the HOPE rules alone that way….. Or maybe, we need a +- system where a B- only earns you 2.7 quality points for GPA calculation. I think this problem could be handled much more efficiently this way.

EnoughAlready

December 27th, 2010
4:42 pm

The idea of NO second chance only hurt poor and low income students, those who party hard; but have deep pocket parents will get a second chance. The only thing is they got their first chance for free; i.e NOT at the expense of the deep pocket parents.

As a christian, I believe in redemption.

Another thought process

December 27th, 2010
4:46 pm

Instead of cutting the HOPE recipients, how about finding ways to increase the lottery revenues instead? Reduce the jackpots by 5%, possibly add dog or horse tracks, or maybe even a casino? Don’t punish good students…..and the parents of good students!

EnoughAlready

December 27th, 2010
4:47 pm

It doesn’t matter if we change the grade scale; teachers and principals will find away around it for their students and school. No one likes to have their community or school look like failures; so they inflate grades.

How else could we have so many students with highschool diplomas, who can barely read and perform basic math operations?

d

December 27th, 2010
4:50 pm

@Another thought – I love your idea but it’ll likely never happen in Georgia. We barely passed the lottery in the 90s, and it’s going to be even harder to try to do something like that with Georgia’s currently political make up.

@Maureen – do you know how to contact Dr. Barge? I wonder if the DOE would consider something like I proposed a few minutes ago. I truly believe that process would be much more efficient than an act of the General Assembly.

Maureen Downey

December 27th, 2010
4:53 pm

@d, The last e-mail I had for John Barge was johnbarge@electjohnbarge.com. But his DOE e-mail is probably up and running. I would assume it would be: jbarge@doe.k12.ga.us
Maureen

Cameron

December 27th, 2010
4:54 pm

The same people who are concerned about the difficulty of the majors would likely be up in arms over your suggestion. It seems to me that some kind of sliding scale that incorporates ability to pay with what HOPE pays seems appropriate, with the stipulation that any student receives at least some scholarship award no matter the income level. It would need to be constructed in a way that is much more gradual the federal system appears to me.

[...] and more »Apple iPod touch 8 GB (4th Generation) NEWEST MODEL Via Legislature can’t ignore the HOPE crisis any longer – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog… [...]

Sid

December 27th, 2010
4:58 pm

rather than no 2nd chances why not just do what most companies (used to) do: make it reimbursement based? student/family/whoever floats the 1st semester (so they have “skin in the game”) and get reimbursed for every B or better.

secondly, most of the “fixes” I’ve read have been across the board along some axis (grades, income, etc) – why not target it by major based on what will have the most (positive) economic impact to the state? we could do something like fully fund all biochemistry majors, top 80% (by GPA) of business majors and only top 100 (or whatever #) English majors. stop worrying about political palatability or various concepts of “fair” (i.e. political palatability) and look at it from an ROI standpoint (or “fair” from the taxpayer point of view)!

Rich

December 27th, 2010
5:01 pm

If we raise the GPA, grade inflation will follow. Has any study been done on GPA pre and post Hope? My guess is that the average GPA went up.

We should include the SAT to off set the grade inflation.

[...] and more » Call of Duty: Black Ops Via Legislature can’t ignore the HOPE crisis any longer – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog… [...]

teach

December 27th, 2010
5:02 pm

There is a simple way to fix it. Make the scholarship award come at the END of each semester. Therefore if the kids get in and mess up the first semester, then they get no money and the HOPE is not out that money. If a kids does well, then they get their money and it can go to the next semester and so on. They get their final award when they graduate. This would end those kids who really are not into going to college getting the award, then flunking out and that money is never seen again. OR Make students who do not make the grade pay the money back, turn it into a low interest school loan. Then kids have a true incentive to do well and continue to do well.

Bob

December 27th, 2010
5:03 pm

How about cutting all the extra programs it added. Let’s face it pre-K programs, computer in school, etc while I am quite sure benefit the child, is often used as a free baby sitting service or other give away program. College kids already have enough on them just keeping the good grades and for those of you who think just because someone makes 75K or more they can somehow afford the high costs of college.

Legislators need to start worrying about those poor folks who can not afford college. There are more than enough free college money for kids who make decent grades and who family’s financial situation is poor.

d

December 27th, 2010
5:04 pm

@Sid we can’t try to run government like a business. It is not. Government should not be trying to earn a profit. We can’t be looking at the ROI or other business factors in these decisions. We must be looking at what is the best for all Georgians, and all Georgians aren’t necessarily adept at every potential major, but all can be fully involved citizens and taxpayers if given the opportunity.

Burroughston Broch

December 27th, 2010
5:09 pm

@ More Republican Garbage

Actually, the Lottery legislation was established by a Democrat-controlled Legislature under Governor Miller. It requires 50% of the income be returned as winnings and splits the rest between HOPE and the expenses of running the Lottery, with HOPE coming in last. The high salaries and bonuses year after year take precedence over HOPE.

In addition to increasing the percentage that goes to HOPE and decreasing the employees compensation, the Legislature should prohibit any university student taking remedial courses from HOPE benefits.

Susan

December 27th, 2010
5:14 pm

Reality hurts when it hits the politicians between the eyes. As a retired college financial aid director who was involved in the original writing of the HOPE regulations and had to manage the changes from year to year I can attest to the fact that all who administer the program have known for years funding could never keep up with the demands for HOPE. Having observed the HOPE hearings 5-6 years ago it was clear the reality of outgo versus income was not matched by the political will to address needed changes. Now, the water has risen beyond flood stage and those under the gold dome are stunned to realize their choice of oars is minimal.

Rather than adding more eligibility criteria or changing what has been a long-standing standard for receiving HOPE would it not be easier to simply spend what the lottery provides from year-to-year? The Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget, the Georgia Student Finance Commision and Lottery officials are very capable of projecting lottery income and HOE demand from year to year. Colleges and universities across the state are also very good at projecting their credit hour production from year to year. If the prior year’s Lottery income projection for HOPE (A) is compared to the coming year’s credit hour production for expected HOPE recipients (B) a simple act of dividing A by B would reveal the amount of HOPE available per credit hour for HOPE recipients.

Yes, this would result in fewer HOPE dollars per student but that is going to be the case no matter which option is used. It is understandable and would allow for financial aid awards to be prepared for students in time to pay summer tuition bills. It would also give the politicians the ability to say “Hey, we’re only spending what is available so don’t blame us.” There are many details which would have to be worked out but those in the state who manage this program are more than able to handle this. HOPE Scholarships have become a tremendous entitlement program for many of the recipients and at least knowing everyone is being reduced in a similar fashion would deny any group the perceived right to holler “Ouch” louder than any other group.

One issue which has not been addressed in the media is the timing of these changes. HOPE regulations per state law are changed for the Summer semester. Some of those classes begin in May. Even if the General Assembly by some miracle finishes its work by late March it is unlikely any statutory changes made in the HOPE Program can be studied, regulations written and college computer systems updated to award HOPE correctly for the Summer. High school students who are trying to make an enrollment decision without knowing how much their HOPE Scholarship will be can easily be drawn to out-of-state to colleges which can provide complete scholarship information. Depending on the complexity of the changes it could be late summer before computer systems can be updated. It is easy to say “well, just get out your pencil and paper and determine which student is eligible and which is not” but when you attempt to do that for more than 200,000 HOPE recipients it is impossible to do it correctly without computer support.

The HOPE Scholarship has literally changed the lives of hundreds of thousands of our state college stgudents. It is incumbent upon the General Assembly to finally manage the budgetary concerns while at the same time continuing to provide funding in a timely fashion to insure the higher education enrollment for our state citizens.

WAW

December 27th, 2010
5:14 pm

“Graduate with a B average from high school and go to a public college or university for absolutely free.”

That is what the voters of Georgia passed. That is it. Period. If you want to go to a private, part-time, for-profit college then have at it but not on the backs of students for whom the HOPE scholarship program was passed. Legislators should repent of sins of lying, cheating, stealing that is what they have done to HOPE!

Now that Republicans are in charge they need to do what the voters wanted not what their owners want. But then that is not the way they operate. Slavery is bad for everyone.

blackbird13

December 27th, 2010
5:20 pm

Why is there no mention from officials about making HOPE a reimbursement/loan program, dependent on the first 30 hours gpa? It largely eliminates the grade inflation at the high school level (where teachers are under much greater pressure to inflate grades than at the college level) and it cuts out the free ride for those who waste a year of free college on partying.

Bobbie

December 27th, 2010
5:22 pm

I have a hard time understanding why it’s given at all to those who CHOOSE a private college. Go to a cheaper, public school. If you want to go to a private college then take out a loan.

zinc

December 27th, 2010
5:24 pm

@Burroughston

You might want to check your statement for accuracy. Your information is not correct.

The bottomline is that keeping payouts high encourages people to play the lottery more. More people playing the lottery = more sales. More sales = more money for education. There is a reason the GA lottery continues to wildly popular. In fact, they have posted 12 consecutive years of increased revenue. Do some research on how other states have fared the past two years.

The Lottery Corp is a PRIVATE business. The state should have no say in how much people are paid, bonuses, etc. Lest we forget that the job of the Lottery is not to supplement the State budget, but to provide games and winnings to those who play.

d

December 27th, 2010
5:30 pm

@blackbird I can’t tell you how many students have told me they need a (fill in the blank) in my class. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve told those same students it won’t likely happen because they haven’t earned it. I’m sorry. You want the grade, do the work. I know quite a few of my fellow educators who feel the same, I just wish it was all of my fellow educators.

history teacher

December 27th, 2010
5:31 pm

One cost saving measure is to not allow HOPE for students who are PELL grant eligible. Students who get HOPE and qualify for PELL make money on the deal. I teach at a school where students make close to $1000 a semester. HOPE is used first. The rest is paid for by Pell and Pell money not used is sent to students.

Double Zero Eight

December 27th, 2010
5:32 pm

Set a minimum ACT or SAT score in conjunction with
the B GPA requirement. Eliminate remedial classes as
part of the accepted college curriculum. You can’t be
in a remedial class and be a true “scholar”.

julia

December 27th, 2010
5:32 pm

this is the reason I do not like Nathan NO Deal… this need to go back to a cap of income and his comment of keeping the smart kids in ga was just absurd!

[...] and more » Call of Duty: Black Ops Via Legislature can’t ignore the HOPE crisis any longer – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog… [...]

d

December 27th, 2010
5:33 pm

@History teacher Has it always been that way? I earned HOPE (although I did use it at a private university) but my PELL was significantly reduced – specifically by $3,000. I think after all my expenses were paid, loans included, I may have received a check for about $500 a semester back from the school.

d

December 27th, 2010
5:35 pm

@Double Zero Eight,
Why the SAT/ACT requirement? I’m personally fine with ineligibility of remedial classes, but why press more emphasis and profit towards the testing industry?

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by ODE GAE NEA. ODE GAE NEA said: RT @AJCGetSchooled: Legislature can’t ignore the HOPE crisis any longer http://bit.ly/eOwGvc [...]

catlady

December 27th, 2010
5:38 pm

Cross-tab the grades (which are suspect in many cases) with the SAT/ACT scores. We need to give the full HOPE to those who have shown the skills necessary to succeed. When the student can show skills (ie college GPA) necessary to succeed in college, they can “earn” it, at the 30 hour (college level work) mark. It would serve two purposes: to weed out those whose grades have been inflated AND to encourage students to get the 30 hours more quickly. Of course, it adds pressure to the college professors, but they are already getting that pressure anyway. And the SAT/ACT provision adds credence to the suitability of the student for college level work, as long as the cut is set high enough to mean something. I know the professors would appreciate students who are actually ready for college. It might also divert attention at the high school level to preparing students, instead of finding ways to give students Bs. As to the argument that there are students who “don’t test well”, well, they had better get good at it quickly before they go to college!

d

December 27th, 2010
5:42 pm

@catlady I don’t know about you, but in both my undergraduate and graduate experiences, I encountered very few multiple choice tests. Is there some other way of assessing students’ readiness for college-level work that we could implement if we are going to tie some sort of assessment to HOPE eligibility? Frankly, I am very concerned about using SAT and ACT, but I certainly don’t want to see the state of Georgia try to establish its own test for this.

Chuck Allison

December 27th, 2010
5:45 pm

Eliminate the lottery and tell parents to save their gambling money for their kid’s education.

schlmarm

December 27th, 2010
5:50 pm

Universal Pre-K is nothing more than babysitting, and doing the job that should be done at home. It’s another entitlement program. Those babies are too young to be in school all day anyway. Pour the money where it belongs–K-12 and college.

catlady

December 27th, 2010
5:50 pm

Or, another more elaborate idea is that we make policy that would channel students with a 3.0 but poor SAT into the 2 year colleges–HOPE would pay for that. Students with a 3.0 but an SAT showing mastery of high school level math, reading, and reading would be eligible for HOPE tuition paid at 4 year colleges. This could result in significant savings getting marginal students into colleges that have more significant safeguards and support systems.

Val

December 27th, 2010
5:51 pm

hmmmm…I guess the right to vote is important(now)?! Too late!

[...] Legislature can't ignore the HOPE crisis any longerAtlanta Journal Constitution (blog)A prominent DeKalb lawmaker recommends incorporating a minimum SAT/ACT score to qualify for HOPE. State Rep. Fran Millar, R-Dunwoody, said tightening the …and more » [...]

d

December 27th, 2010
5:55 pm

@Catlady – now that is something I like. I still think it needs to be coupled with changing the grading scale state wide. Between the time I graduated in 1997 and my sister’s graduation in 2000, Gwinnett County changed its grading scale to not put their students at a “disadvantage” with other students in the state. I had a student last semester who was a transfer from North Carolina and in the 3 parent conferences I had with her mother, she was surprised that we allow an A at 90 and a B at 80. I believe she said you had to have a 94 for an A and 85 for a B. Seems fair to me.

@schlmarm – I have a good friend who teaches kindergarten in DeKalb. I hear her tell about the differences of students who come in from the state Pre-K program and those who never darkened a schoolhouse door until their first day of kindergarten. Something is going right in Pre-K, it’s not just babysitting.

Concerned 1

December 27th, 2010
5:58 pm

@ Chuck Allison…sounds like a winner.

[...] and more »Apple iPod touch 8 GB (4th Generation) NEWEST MODEL Via Legislature can’t ignore the HOPE crisis any longer – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog… [...]

GNGS

December 27th, 2010
6:04 pm

SAT is best at predicting a student’s performance in college. If the goal is not to waste HOPE money by students who quit college after first year, adding a minimal SAT score as a requirement seems to be the most obvious solution. In addition, a SAT score (or other standardized test scores) will address grade inflation problem.

d

December 27th, 2010
6:09 pm

@GNGS, I believe a student’s GPA is a much better predictor. I also believe since most teachers’ gradebooks are now available online, that will reduce grade inflation because parents can clearly see their students aren’t performing. SAT is an aptitude test, and frankly, we have way too many students taking it as it is now.

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Chris Eggleston. Chris Eggleston said: Legislature can't ignore the HOPE crisis any longer: And the bleak economy is sending more Georgians bac… http://bit.ly/gRwG2Q #grants [...]

catlady

December 27th, 2010
6:23 pm

d, I think the SAT and GPA coupled provide something like 40% of the predictive power of how a student will do their first year in college. Pretty high, putting them together. That is from national studies, and does not take into account the distortions in Ga high school gpas (putting that in a very gentle way). I view the SAT as an achievement test, as it measures what you have learned to do.

I am sure you are younger than I am, but I had a LOT of multiple choice tests as an undergrad. Actually, quite a few in my master’s programs. Not any I can remember in my PhD. I still posit that the skills involved in taking mc tests would be important to college AND high school success.

Motivation is super-important, but you’ve got to have the basic skills. We can’t count on a 3.0 indicating that, at least in Georgia.

Double Zero Eight

December 27th, 2010
6:24 pm

@d
Grade inflation is an issue thorughout Georgia. The SAT
or ACT minimum requirement in conjunction with a 3.0
GPA will level the playing field,
.

Double Zero Eight

December 27th, 2010
6:26 pm

Spelled “throughout” incorrectly in my previous post.

dk

December 27th, 2010
6:30 pm

Here is a strange idea, why not get a job and pay for your own college degree? I worked full time and went to college either part time or full time depending on the money I had, as millions of other graduates have done. I even borrower money that I am paying back now.

Of those who take the hope, how many get a at least a two year degree? Nationally, less then 50% finish college, so it seems like a waste of money. If you have skin in the game, then you are more likely to do what it takes to finish.

And if you want your free tuition, why not join the military, put in 4 years and get the cash?

Pompano

December 27th, 2010
6:31 pm

The Hope fund has been plundered by the Colleges & Universities themselves. The astromical rise in costs at these instutitions over the last decade is what has placed the Hope scholarship in financial stress.

The only long-term solution is to reduce the actual costs associated with post-secondary education and cut waste/beauracracy.

JF McNamara

December 27th, 2010
6:38 pm

Why not allow Casinos since its already supported by gambling?

Why not add a need based element to hope? Why are poor people buying lottery tickets supporting the education of wealthy children when they could pay the tuition without much struggle?

Why not come into to 2000s and allow alcholol sales on Sunday with an extra tax?

The first thing our rich lesgislators want to do is cut primarily areas where they won’t be affected. Their kids go to the best schools, have the best GPAs and highest test scores. They’ll happilly cut your kids funding and sell it as Republicans acting fiscally responsable when really they are cutting your benefits only. Stop falling for it. We can keep hope as is. We just need to think harder about where to get the funding or cut some of the tax breaks helping those who don’t really need them.

This isn’t a white or black thing either. If you grow up in a rural county, you’re probably not getting the same education as someone living in Buckhead and your test scores won’t be as high. You will have to work harder in college to make up for your schooling even if you had a GPA in high school.

If they are serious about saving hope, put a cap on the income of the parents for the students. I’ll probably end up paying myself, but I’ll thank God for being able to do so instead of crying about it.

OneFreeMan

December 27th, 2010
6:58 pm

Cut cost by offering more online courses and less classroom time then close no longer needed buildings. College campuses will eventually be a waste of money.

Reality Check

December 27th, 2010
7:01 pm

I see a few others have commented on the Pre-K program. I never hear the legislators threatening to cut that program. When it started, it was for low income or at-risk students. I’m not sure when the requirements changed and I don’t remember much publicity regarding the change. Maybe parents should have a choice – receive lottery education funds for Pre-K or wait to receive lottery education funds for college–bot not both.

Not Don Waddell

December 27th, 2010
7:17 pm

There is a very simple explanation to this. If the parents make enough that the cost of yearly tuition + room and board = less than 10% of gross revenue, then they should be ineligible for Hope.

However, there should be a tax incentive for those people, maybe say that parents fully funding their kids’ tuition would not pay any income tax on an equal percentage of their income.

Education has become fool’s gold anyway. Poor people keep sending their kids to school with Hope as a red herring, the kids finish, often without graduating, and usually have a substantial amount of loan debt. I would think that the economy would be making more kids stay home and begin working at 18. Some folks just aren’t cut out for college. It is not a right.

Realist

December 27th, 2010
7:23 pm

Solution is to eliminate the pre-K dollars and private school money.

abacus2

December 27th, 2010
7:35 pm

Hope could pay for 50% up front and reimburse the remainder upon successful completion of classes. Also, no payment for remediation classes. I’m tired of watching students party for a year using Hope money and then drop put when they lose the scholarship. The money should have to be paid back if they leave school without a degree.

catlady

December 27th, 2010
7:37 pm

Ms. Downey, what percentage of high school graduates in 1990 had a 3.0 average vs now? I would guess that at some high schools, the percent has doubled. Now, of course, grade inflation is not the sole cause of this. Some schools have been redistricted and have better students. And, of course, one of the goals of HOPE was to encourage the best. There are certainly more AP courses available at most schools. So you would need to link these gpas with SAT scores. Even that isn’t ideal, because I think a higher percentage of students are taking the SAT now than did 20 years ago.

Part of the problem is that, unless it has changed recently, the state has not opened the data to research by those who don’t have a horse in the race, so to speak. The state has also commissioned very simplistic research on HOPE and its results.

So, other than anecdotal evidence, we may not know much about how it is working and how it has changed the college-going or college-destination question–not nearly as much as we should, or as much as legislators need to know (not that they would pay attention) to make important decisions regarding HOPE.

Dr. Craig Spinks /Augusta

December 27th, 2010
7:39 pm

What are the several most powerful student-related predictors of graduation from institutions in the USG? Let the HOPE administrators employ these USG-generated predictors in granting scholarships.

Jen4839234

December 27th, 2010
7:40 pm

Get rid of the Georgia Pre-K Hope funded program. It is glorified babysitting. I would rather send a kid to college than a toddler to pre-K.

catlady

December 27th, 2010
7:46 pm

zinc, the lottery is a state-chartered MONOPOLY. It is protected by the government. As such, it functions under the auspices of the state.

rick

December 27th, 2010
7:48 pm

Here is the answer on pell grants. Under Governor Miller the original program deducted Pell grants first, and then HOPE picked up the remainder. The idea was why use state resources replacing fed funds already in place. In addition, by not replacing pell grants it gave u even more HOPE money to help even more students. Governor Barnes changed this because of minority pressure. THAT was the HOPE money buster. Change it back and u can easily save HOPE.

ScienceTeacher671

December 27th, 2010
8:09 pm

On the college level, I agree with not paying for private colleges, adding an SAT/ACT minimum score for eligibility, not funding remedial courses, and/or making HOPE into a reimbursement program for those who make the grades or low-interest loan program for those who don’t.

For Pre-K, I think a sliding-scale tuition should be charged. The program was originally designed as a catch-up program for underprivileged youngsters, not as free daycare for all.

Remedial College Classes

December 27th, 2010
8:15 pm

There is absolutely no reason at all for HOPE scholarship funds to be used for remedial courses. AND, the schools that are sending kids to college who qualify for HOPE based on their high school GPA but require remedial courses need to be looked at very closely!! My daughter graduated from one of the top ranked high schools in Georgia. With the changes to the way honors and AP courses were weighted for HOPE graduates after 2006, she barely missed out on qualifying for HOPE out of high school with a 2.9. One of her college friends was “home schooled” through a private Christian school and was taking all remedial, non credit classes for the first full year of college, all paid for on the HOPE scholarship.

jd

December 27th, 2010
8:22 pm

Start HOPE after the first semester — use the college GPA to qualify. Would eliminate dependence upon grade inflated K12 gpas… more than a third of students lose HOPE their freshman year — huge savings. Restrict HOPE Grants to 3.0 students pursuing an AA degree at technical colleges. HOPE should not be a job training program.

oldtimer

December 27th, 2010
8:32 pm

TN requires minimum scores on ACT. Also, Home Schooled students need ACT-SAT scores and must successfully complete 1 year of college. Unaccredited HS grades should not count. The students who need remedial work should go to two year colleges. In fact, I think community colleges should be the way for most for at least the first year. In the county I now live in in TN….If you graduate from the local HS you can attend the local community college at no cost..except for books….

dcb

December 27th, 2010
8:41 pm

I’m never sure exactly where you are coming from in your columns, Maureen. Even in this one. But your last paragraph repeated below really made a believer out of me. And as a retired school head having seen the pendulum swing over the years from a work and pride based mantra by our parents and young people, to the current “entitlement driven society” I salute you for putting it in print: “I counter that students need to learn that sometimes there are no second chances. Otherwise, students may be forced to learn another tough lesson: There are no free lunches or tuition anymore, either.”

As a PS I also would ask, “does this senior memory fail me when I recall that the way the state lottery was sold to the public as a way to gain more monies for education was to include a HOPE scholarship that included minimal 3.0 GPA and no SAT/ACT test scores (to gain the votes of the rural votes), and no financial need requirement (for the more affluent community votes)?”

GNGS

December 27th, 2010
8:43 pm

While adding a minimal SAT score as a requirement for HOPE is a good idea, an unintended consequence may be that only kids from higher income families will benefit from the HOPE scholarship since SAT score tends to correlate with income. One way to solve this potential problem is to guarantee top students (top 10 percent for instance) from schools with high percentage of poorer students (judging by percentage of free/reduced lunch population) with HOPE in case SAT score becomes a problem for them.

If a student who is eligible for Pell grant earns a HOPE scholarship, the student deserves to have both, especially if the standard for HOPE is raised. It will be grossly unfair to try to balance HOPE account on the back of capable but poorer students.

Keep the Hope

December 27th, 2010
8:44 pm

In college a 3.0 is very very good. Not every student is a straight A student. I know because I one of those students. Georgia Hope every year gives the executives a $300,000 bonus if not more. Why do they deserve that? They are paid a salary to do their job. Bonus money should not break the bank. Do you know how many schoolarships can be used with this $300,000 bonus? And thats just for 1 executive. Now get rid of the rest of the garbage funds that also come out of the Hope. Personally, I think that any parent who makes over 150,000 can pay for college on their own. Get rid of these high salary people. They dont need it. There is no reason they have to cut the funding, just the way they do business.

Dekalbite

December 27th, 2010
8:48 pm

Pre-K has been here for 20 years. Surely there are studies testifying to its efficacy. If Pre-K cannot be shown as improving student achievement, then this program needs to be dropped.

Hope Stays

December 27th, 2010
8:48 pm

jd – HOPE should not be a job training program? Tell that to the HVAC person who fixes your air when you are burning up, or the plumber who comes to your home when your under water, or the electrician who comes calling when your breakers keep blowing. Not all people need a AA but we do need the technical skills of trained professionals. Your way off base there. I do agree though that it should be college 3.0 and not the inflated 3.0 that the high schools hand out like candy. Most of these kids graduating now cant count change or read a book without a computer and a calculator.

Burroughston Broch

December 27th, 2010
8:59 pm

@ zinc

You should first check your information before accusing others of being correct. You picked the wrong blogger to cross.

STRIKE ONE. From the Lottery’s 2009 annual report, “The Georgia Lottery Corporation (the “GLC”) was established as an instrumentality of the state with the enactment of the Georgia Lottery for Education Act (the “Act”) on November 2, 1992. The GLC is responsible for the provision of lotteries on behalf of the State of Georgia in accordance with the Act and is a component unit of the State of Georgia.

STRIKE TWO. By law, half of the income is supposed to go to prizes, one-third to education, and the remainder to operating and marketing the lottery. They seem to have lost sight of that split since, Of the $3.399 billion in 2009 income, 64% went to prizes, 25% to HOPE and the rest to operations. If the income had been split according to law, Hope would have gotten $1.133 billion instead of $872 million; in 2009 HOPE was shorted by 30%.

STRIKE 3. You stated, “The Lottery Corp is a PRIVATE business. The state should have no say in how much people are paid, bonuses, etc. Lest we forget that the job of the Lottery is not to supplement the State budget, but to provide games and winnings to those who play.” What utter nonsense! See Strike One – the Lottery is a State business. It is the taxpayer’s business how it is run and how its staff is compensated. It is a money-making operation of the State to raise money for education, not to provide amusement for the gullible.

You’re out.

susan

December 27th, 2010
9:00 pm

how about this: let people ourside of atlanta win the lottery sometimes and more people will play_ thus there will be more money for education…as it is now the only winning tickets are in atlanta….so i stopped playing! the more folks win the more they will play and the more revenue! go figure

Really Amazed

December 27th, 2010
9:18 pm

I agree, increasing the gpa would only lead to more grade inflation. Include a fair min sat score.

Concerned 1

December 27th, 2010
9:26 pm

Also have a minimum SAT/ACT for those who buy Cash 3/ Cash 4 and all the other addictive mess that supports HOPE. That will definitely level the playing field.

Rich

December 27th, 2010
9:28 pm

As in TN, GA home schooled students need to wait a year. I assume that this was put in place because people fears on grade inflation for home schooled children, but it seems to be a problem in public schools also.

Angela

December 27th, 2010
9:29 pm

Although I cannot understand why the cost of higher education is so high (as opposed to other countries), I tend to agree with those who think that an education should be saved for and paid out of pocket. The last time I checked, everyone is entitled to the same employment access, wealthy and not so wealthy; and the process of saving money is the same amongst all wealth classes.

This society is so against government help and help from taxpayers, yet expect to have a free education. The Capitalism you want doesn’t work that way, you have to earn your keep.

Hope is a grand gesture, and I’m all for it (I’m a believer in true socialism) but in this country, since its inception, has chosen capitalism. Americans cannot have their cake and eat it too.

Reward those who work to pay for education through Hope. If a semester of education costs 6k, and the student has 3k and a credible GPA, Hope can match the savings to HELP pay for the education. The State could offer more options of work-study for students, and HOPE could cover the rest of the tuition.

or

Use lottery funds to help fund the better colleges and lower their tuition to affordable rates. That way
Institutions could quit nickle and diming the public, raising tuition every semester and make it more affordable.

Big business will not take responsibility, so society needs to sometime.

Rich

December 27th, 2010
9:31 pm

@Remedial College Classes – I am confused with your statement “was “home schooled” through a private Christian school” seems to me you are home schooled or go to a private Christian school.

I agree with you that remedial classes should not be included. Tells me that the student is not a “B” student.

Shaun

December 27th, 2010
9:31 pm

More students will be taking out government loans if it isn’t awarded (and reimbursed) until the 30-hour mark. I believe that are more efficient ways of rectifying the situation without taking such an approach as the article suggests.

Rich

December 27th, 2010
9:35 pm

It is funny that we are having this discussion. I voted against the lottery for the simple fact that it was used to fund programs that would be difficult to cut if there was not enough money. I would have voted for it if it was used to fund capital projects. We save the money and build something that did not require a stream of revenue.

We need to increase revenue or reduce spending. Maybe a casino could be next, but not in metro atlanta. We would mess it up here.

Save Hope

December 27th, 2010
9:51 pm

Build a video lottery casino. At least 8 states already offer this option to lottery players. The head of the Georgia lottery system said a lottery casino could raise “hundreds of millions” of dollars similar to other states where they were built. The casino is simply taking today’s scratch off tickets you buy at Publix and let a person buy and play them electronicly via a video terminal. And it can be done legally without any vote by the public or the legislature. All the Georgia Lottery Board has to do is vote to allow it. No brainer.

jd

December 27th, 2010
10:02 pm

HOPE STAYS – HOPE was designed to Help Outstanding Pupils Excel — not to Help Folks get endless certificates in technical training. HOPE has to return to its roots to succeed. If it fails, then the outstanding students will once again leave Georgia to find education and careers leaving us with a state where unemployment hovers at 15% (that’s the rate for those without a BA) and average income around 44k…

the prof

December 27th, 2010
10:10 pm

Keep Pre-K (from someone who is taking triple advantage of it at this time, so a personal bias!) and make all HOPE money available on a sliding scale based on SAT scores, period, end of story. The lottery is basically a tax on people who don’t pay taxes to begin with so absolutely no discussion of an “income” cap. Either you can be a college student or you can’t and a little debt never hurt anyone.

Tracy

December 27th, 2010
10:19 pm

Rest assured the lower class students will get screwed over by the final decisions. Meanwhile, familes that could afford to write a check to cover the entire degree will save money on having to pay.

Poverty is a cycle and the kern-serv-a-tives of Jaw-Ger are going to do everything to ensure it’s not broken. How about you use the HOPE money to build State ran churches and punish those who don’t attend ? Jaw-Ger….lol.

Toto: speakin' the truth to power

December 27th, 2010
10:33 pm

“But it dulls the shine of the scholarship, which flourished on a simple and accessible concept: Graduate with a B average from high school and go to a public college or university for absolutely free.”
Ho, Ho, Ho! Sorry, Virginia; there’s no Santa Clause nor a free lunch. Time to grow up and face reality. The lottery was passed so the GAMEMAKERS could get rich off of Georgians and have a monopoly on the state casino. Why don’t THEY take a haircut? The gambling money is part of the problem of tuition inflation. Grades are inflated so more students can go to college and spend the ill gotten gains. Greedy universities see an opportunity and raise the rates. Many citizens opposed the lottery from the beginning, and it took “zig-zag” Zell with his casino funded campaign to railroad the lottery through.

another comment

December 27th, 2010
11:54 pm

I really don’t know where so many on these boards think those who make $150K can just fully pay for the cost of college, tuition , room and board, out of pocket. It amazes me at the ignorance, some in the lower pay brackets do not understand that we are already funding everyone else with the taxes that are withheld and paid from our pay. So If someone has worked their butt off, been imported into this State from a State with top 10 schools. Gone to a top 20 University received advanced degrees in the tough degrees that most of you could never get into. Then gotten into the management track, $150K is an easily deserved salary. The problem is you only come home with $75-90K a year after taxes. So where do you come up with the 25K to 30K to just peel off the cash tuition to Georgia or Georgia Tech. It is not there in the budget especially with multiple children, when you would not qualify for any need based grants. HOPE was set up on MERIT, my children have worked hard and I have worked hard they deserve chance at the HOPE scholarship. It should not be used for remedial classes, that is a joke.

My kids and my peers kids are the ones sitting at the top of the class the ones that will score the highest on the SAT. They can get In-State tuition at Auburn or Alabama based on their GPA and SAT scores. They can also get in alot of other places just like their cousin who just got accepted to Harvard. So who do you want sitting in Georgia schools??? There are less than two my children will even be allowed to apply to. The others don’t have a high enough graduation rate for me to spend my money on.

native

December 28th, 2010
12:24 am

@another comment

I am in your income range, have three children in college, putting them through school out of pocket thanks to HOPE, and I couldn’t disagree more. We can aford it. Others need it more.

Grade inflation is a problem. However, delayed reimbursement may be educational damnation for the poorest.

I think some form of means testing is the best solution.

An American Patriot

December 28th, 2010
4:52 am

Another governmental program gone amok……when are we gonna learn not to pay out more than we take in? This is idiotic to even be discussing it…..has no one in our state government ever heard of a budget? and sticking to it? As tax paying citizens of Georgia, we need to demand financial restraint in this program. :) I know, that’s a stupid idea.

Too many fools running this State

December 28th, 2010
7:17 am

In it’s essence the Hope Scholarship is an entitlement program. So then why are so many of the same people who vote GOP at every election standing inline for a Government handout? If you call yourself a Republican you should be ashamed for using this program. It was started for the less fortunate who would not otherwise be able to afford college not for Sandy Springs and Dunwoody residents to send their kids to college for free while they drive 80K cars and vacation in France. The simple fix here is to base eligibility on the 3.0 grade AND income of the family and number of students from that family. Simple solution to a simple problem but the morons that run Georgia will certainly screw the pooch on this just as they do everything else.

Dr NO

December 28th, 2010
7:31 am

Its all a bait and switch scam. High schools inflate grades so more students will be eligible and the program, in general, is full of individuals stealing hand over fist.

Anytime a govt entity is involved in anything you can bet fraud, waste, theft run rampant. There is no longer any hope left for HOPE.

If one wants to go to college then get a job, pay for it and go. I sincerely hope they discontinue the HOPE FRAUD FUND.

Dr NO

December 28th, 2010
7:33 am

HOPE and all the other democratic entitlement programs should be discontinued…Welfare, food stamps, school lunch, elderly heating assistance etc. The handouts to these democratic bums and losers needes to stop.

NWGA Teacher

December 28th, 2010
7:50 am

Those of you who want affluent parents to pay for college out-of-pocket: please remember that this is a CHOICE for those parents. No one can force parents to pay for their kids’ educations. My child’s father has declined to participate in any support, including college, beyond age 18. This is not unusual. For us, HOPE is a huge opportunity.

What if

December 28th, 2010
8:00 am

I’ll disagree one more time, Maureen, about your insistence on ‘one chance.’ – While many kids wade into college either undisciplined (i.e., immature) or not trained in discipline well enough in high school, having the HOPE rug pulled out from under them once is apparently sufficient to wake up many. In other cases, there are disasters of one sort or another that would make it woefully inappropriate to pull the golden goose forever – my own case, long ago, in another state, no HOPE at stake: my mother died in my Junior year. Went from my typical 3.5-ish range to -um – something less. You REALLY want to tell me just to “suck it up, kid – you’re really going to let your mother dying get to you? What a pansy. Too bad, sucker.” I’d hope not.
On another front, re: Pre-K: While offering babysitting for so many is likely a good economic idea enabling some to work when otherwise they could not, if we faced up to it the research is excruciatingly clear (psuedo-evaluations of Georgia’s Pre-K notwithstanding) that ONLY when well trained teachers follow particular curricula does Pre-K help low-income children. And it does that very well. BUT – there is NO evidence that high school or Associate’s degree kids doing sitdownshutupandcounttoahundred under little or no developmental supervision make any difference whatsoever. It is also unlikely that the typically fully certified in elementary (not early childhood) teachers in the public schools – also trying to get 4-year-olds to behave as 2nd graders – make any difference in the long OR short run. Furthermore, there is NO evidence that Pre-K makes any long-term societal difference for middle- or upper-class kids. SO, until we as a state decide to implement REAL early childhood ed in the preschools focusing on low-income kids, we’re only providing fairly expensive babysitting service. That may well be a reasonable thing to do for the economy, but we shouldn’t delude ourselves into believing we’re making a long-term difference for the kids themselves.

ABC ABC

December 28th, 2010
8:09 am

Peter Smagorinsky

December 28th, 2010
8:12 am

Just a quick note of thanks to Maureen for keeping us alert to key educational issues in Georgia, to the AJC for giving her blog and column increased visibility at the website (not long ago, you had to really look to find it), and to all contributors for their thoughtful comments. This is one of the few places I know of where teachers, parents, and other stakeholders can engage in a reasonable discussion of important challenges facing the effort to educate Georgia children and youth. I often share the column with my students at UGA and read it faithfully. I think that Maureen’s work is the jewel of the AJC and I hope is a column read by all policymakers and administrators involved in education in Georgia.

Peter Smagorinsky

December 28th, 2010
8:16 am

I have been at UGA since 1998, and faculy who have been around longer almost universally say that the caliber of students has greatly improved since Hope was instituted because the kids work harder in high school and the best students are more likely to stay in-state. It’s not a perfect system, and there’s surely grade inflation to help kids get the initial funding. The poor are indeed more likely than the rich to buy lottery tickets, and so there’s a reverse subsidization of higher education funding at work. But do we really want to throw out the baby with the bathwater by eliminating a program that involves no taxation and funds the college education of so many students because it has some flaws?

BlahBlahBlah

December 28th, 2010
8:17 am

Bring the program back to basics, just like it was originally introduced. It’s the gradual additions and enhancements to the program that are causing a good bit of the shortfall.

GA VOTER TOO

December 28th, 2010
8:25 am

Soooo glad you were always little miss perfect and never needed a second chance. Young people, especially boys, do mature and realize their potential.

Car Salesman

December 28th, 2010
8:40 am

Oh please keep dishing out the HOPE dollars. If parents have to spend their own money on their kid’s college, then they will not buy Johnny the new Lexus or BMW to take to school.

Higher Hopes

December 28th, 2010
8:41 am

A 3.0 avg out of high school is simply too low. And why keep the high school graduation avg the same as what is reqd in college? Suggest raising the high school rate to a 3.5 — we are talking after all an academic scholarship, right? Phase this in over 3-4 years, and this alone would save enough, as well as emphasize that a “B” average is not good enough for free money. College reqmt can be left as is, reflecting the increased difficulty in college.

Dr NO

December 28th, 2010
8:42 am

KILL the Hope program.

a

December 28th, 2010
8:50 am

Maybe they should go back to having it based on income as well as grades or a reimbursement program. I think private schools should be eliminated.

Pre-K is NOT babysitting. Maybe that should also be based on income too.

The New York Times had an article about earlier intervention having much higher return on investment than at older ages. Granted the intervention is for 5 and under. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/24/us/24cncwarren.html?ref=education

The state needs to look at what will help the most people and give the highest return on investment not just today but 20 years down the line.

Dr. Craig Spinks /Augusta

December 28th, 2010
8:52 am

Inasmuch as some, if not much, of the HOPE revenue shortfall is a function of grade-inflation at the HS-level, why doesn’t the media provide GA high schools and public school systems motivation to embark upon “truth in grading?” Such motivation might be provided by disseminating regularly data, disaggregated by school and system, concerning the percentage of high school graduates who were awarded HOPE and the percentage of HOPE recipients who completed baccalaureate degree requirements within 6 years.

catlady

December 28th, 2010
8:56 am

Here is another (unanswered) question: How much does pre-k cost per pupil vs. HOPE’s per pupil expenditure?

As to HOPE: Is it an achievement award (realizing achievement as we define it IS skewed heavily toward the more wealthy) or is it a needs-based award. In the beginning, it was both. It cut off the most wealthy AND the poorest (I think it initially in 1993 had a top cut at $75,000(is that right?) and a bottom cut at the Pell level, which was about $20,000 back then I think. They got rid of the top cap before they got rid of the bottom cap. (Big surprise, huh?)

I argued against it as such then, and I do so now. ANY KID who has the grades should get it (but we should add the SAT requirement as grades have become so skewed toward B). What we have seen over the years is that hundreds of thousands of apparently poorly prepared students have ridden the HOPE to a year of freedom from mom and dad, then lost it. Some of these students have continued after losing it, either by taking out loans or by working or by mom and dad funding it. Some of these students never continued. All of them cost us money.

I believe we need to target HOPE to students who are actually SCHOLARS. And that means parsing out which B’s are authentic, and which are not. A student with a true high school B is still going to have a tough time keeping a B average in college, but it is do-able. A kid with a “gimme” B is NOT going to be able to keep a B average, and probably will be on academic probation pretty quickly. Let them discover this on their own dime. It is supposed to, at the college level, be an ACADEMIC award for SCHOLARS, not for seat-warmers and apple-polishers.

catlady

December 28th, 2010
9:00 am

Dr. Spinks, there are too many intervening variables to make your comparison useful for accountability, although it would be fun to look at. I would bet it would fall on SES lines.

Dr. Tim

December 28th, 2010
9:11 am

The real culprit is grade inflation in high schools, public and private. Parental and administrative pressure on teachers to “give an extra point (or two, or three)” is intense. This springs from HOPE. No one looks at a fairly won “C” today as a good, solid, average score. Anything less than a “B” is grounds for heavy conferencing.

atr

December 28th, 2010
9:14 am

not sure why HOPE goes to English, history, literature, basket weaving, or the other majors that there are ample number of people entering into anyway. You want to cut down on the “rich” kids getting a free pass, cut down on the funding (or eliminate) all non-engineering, non-science majors. Rich kids do not want to work. They major in poly sci to avoid real work. Kids from lessor means, like me, take the difficult majors because we need to earn our own money.

36 years in education

December 28th, 2010
9:17 am

Ask any kindergarten teacher if they can see a difference between a child who attends Georgia Pre-K and one who doesn’t– you will hear a resounding “YES!” It certainly isn’t babysitting– these classrooms are rich in experiences for children to learn, grow, and play. Georgia Pre-K is one of the bright spots of education in the state of Georgia. Go to decal.ga.gov and read about the quality of this program.

Chris Sanchez

December 28th, 2010
9:28 am

Maureen,

I agree with the sentiment that once a student loses their scholarship it is gone. These are college students and the sooner they learn that there are consequences for not performing the better off they will be.

I also want to expand on your comments on the whole “graduate with a B average from high school and go to a public college or university for absolutely free” intention. How about lets strip out the add-ons that have come along over the years and get the HOPE back to what it was intended for: college scholarship at public universities in Georgia. I am not saying pre-K is not a worthy program and should not be funded. I am not saying that there should not be some sort of scholarship for private colleges.

What I am saying is that this is what happens to good programs. In good times they are seen as a cash cow and saddled with additional expenses that eventually come back to harm the program for all.

zeke

December 28th, 2010
9:35 am

To solve the “hope” problem, YOU GO BACK TO RUNNING THE LOTTERY WITH THE FUNDS GOING TO COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIPS AS ORIGINALLY MANDATED AND REMOVE ALL THE OTHER PROGRAMS FROM THOSE FUNDS THAT HAVE BEEN ADDED OVER THE YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dr NO

December 28th, 2010
9:35 am

Do away with Hope!!

Steve

December 28th, 2010
9:35 am

It seems to me after following this issue closely (son who is a senior this year) that grade inflation is the MAIN issue. I don’t see why having a cut-off on some national test like the ACT or SAT is so bad. If the HOPE is truly an academic award, then this one simple measure can eliminate the inflated GPA’s currently taking place in high school. Also, most college bound seniors are required to take at least one of these tests anyway. For the people who say that these “nationalized” test are not fair to the kids from poorer backgrounds, I believe those kids can currently get financial aid grants that the children from the middle class can not currently get. If you want to keep the brightest kids home here in Georgia, you MUST keep this scholarship merit, not financially based.

What if

December 28th, 2010
9:52 am

@Peter, SOME of the better students likely stay in state, especially those from lower income families, but the best of the best taught by (e.g.) our common acquaintance still head for the Harvards, Yales and Rensselaers (etc.) when their families can afford it (or the kids get rides). It WOULD be nice to have some decent data on how effective HOPE has been to keep the best and brightest in-state AND remain for employment. I’m not aware of such.
Peter mentions grade inflation too, as have others, and others have mentioned sliding scales of some sort. @HigherHopes, a grade is not a grade is not a grade. A 3.0 (or a whatever) is not any more the same between the high SES vs. low SES high schools than it is between the selective vs. open enrollment USG colleges. Even in the same school, an A in a properly done AP English course requires FAR mor work than in the euphemistically labelled “college prep” courses. To make a blanket change in the required grade average simply forces (as noted by another poster) high-performing kids to take easier classes in high school – and hence learn less. AND be bored. The solution? No silver bullets, folks. A simplistic ill-thought out “solution” will very likely have “interesting” unintended consequences.

mike

December 28th, 2010
9:54 am

It did not take long for the HOPE program to become what it is today. The original intent was to help poorer students with the good grades attend college. So over the years it has mainly paid for the education of those kids whose parents can afford to pay for their kids education. Now with the new goobers in the legislature, the folks who need education the most will be eventually cut out for seemingly various made up reasons. How about being honest and tell those lower income people who buy those lottery tickets that you are going to use their money to send the upper middle class kids to college and not the kids who live in their neighborhood or the ones who attend school with thier kids. What is amazing about this whole process, is that Georgia still ranks near the bottom when compared to other states in education.

What if

December 28th, 2010
10:03 am

@36 Years, SOME of the pre-k programs are no doubt superb. I apologize for my lack of clarity. My point was that if we’re going to get serious about it, let’s make ALL of those programs that good. You know as well as I do, assuming you’ve taught and/or know the research, that a barely made it out of high school kid watching a chaotic roomful of young ones is no match for a PROPERLY trained teacher with a decent curriculum. AND the sitdownshutupandcounttoahundred test prep purgatory so many kids suffer in pre-k as well as the early grades these days is NOT what’s helpful for school completion or to keep low-income kids out of jail 30 years from now (again, assuming you know the research).

ScienceTeacher671

December 28th, 2010
10:15 am

Is the Georgia Lottery Corp paying in the maximum percentage yet? OR are they still giving a minimal amount to education while paying out huge bonuses? They should not be allowed to pay bonuses at all unless they are providing the maximum amount to education.

Maureen Downey

December 28th, 2010
10:21 am

@Atr, Not sure if you are correct as a friend who teaches medical school tells me that the med students most often have one thing in common — parents who are doctors. And while I understand that being a doctor doesn’t assure that you are rich, doctors overall have some of the highest incomes of any profession. Their kids are clearly hardworking to make it into medical school.
Maureen

30327

December 28th, 2010
10:39 am

“The cost of graduating a Georgia college will be higher if HOPE is reduced”-photo caption

Did you mean the inverse, Maureen?

Toto: speakin' the truth to power

December 28th, 2010
10:45 am

@ another comment
While I agree with your premise that $150k is not “rich” because of graduated taxation, your discriminatory rant against Southerners is undermined by your below average writing skills. You cannot string together a proper sentence. My 5th grade home schooler can write better than you! Your attitude epitomizes those Southerners refer to as CARPETBAGGERS. Please go back to blizzard country. We don’t need your kind dragging down our SAT verbal scores.

Grasshopper

December 28th, 2010
10:51 am

Lotteries are a scourge on our society.

They rob the poor and stupid of the money they work hard for (or are given through government subsidy) and give it, for the most part, to those that could afford to send their kids to school without it.

Lotteries are non-productive wastes of money; without them people would spend their money on food, clothing, shelter and other products that provide jobs for others.

People who think that the lottery is a godsend and encourage more legalized ganbling advocate the cheapening of our society even more.

If you count on the lottery to educate your child, you are a societal sponge.

Bob

December 28th, 2010
10:53 am

The economic times of today are not the economic times when the HOPE program was developed. End of story as it was when it was written. Changes need to be made to allow the best possible outcomes for the best students or the programs dies for all. I have always been amazed at the reports indicating how many college students are enrolled in remedial classes because they have not acquired the knowledge to take even entry-level, basic college classes. This speaks to the grade point average of ‘B’ having little meaning anymore. How about granting the HOPE money only to those that have struggled to get to the point where they do not need the remedial classes?

d

December 28th, 2010
10:54 am

@atr We need a much more well-rounded society than just STEM people. Limiting HOPE to STEM people would be a disadvantage to the people of Georgia. I still say we don’t need to change the HOPE rules significantly, but if we make a 3.0 mean more state-wide (meaning, for example a B must be an 84 instead of an 80), you’re going to get a higher quality student.

I read someone who said UGA is getting better students due to HOPE – well this isn’t as much that students are working harder in high school, it is that the top students are picking UGA now whereas it used to be a backup if they didn’t get accepted to places like UCLA.

30327

December 28th, 2010
11:02 am

I don’t see why it can’t just be income based again. How many people from families earning 6 figures are really playing the lottery??? Where’s the “HOPE” in a trust find child using their college savings to buy a luxury vehicle because they know they’ll get HOPE scholarship?

Who is more likely to retain HOPE?? The poor kid whose livelihood depends on scholarships and financial aid or the well off kid who can always fall back on mommy and daddy?

30327

December 28th, 2010
11:05 am

In my experiences, the upper class, high performing student is not interested in post secondary education in Georgia. No offense to anyone.

[...] Downey has a piece on the HOPE scholarship and how the General Assembly can no longer procrastinate on addressing the shrinking chest. A lot [...]

Toto: speakin' the truth to power

December 28th, 2010
11:21 am

“With the changes to the way honors and AP courses were weighted for HOPE graduates after 2006, she barely missed out on qualifying for HOPE out of high school with a 2.9. One of her college friends was “home schooled” through a private Christian school and was taking all remedial, non credit classes for the first full year of college, all paid for on the HOPE scholarship.”

@ Remedial College Classes
This is an ignorant slam against home schoolers. Originally, home schoolers were completely excluded from the Hope scholarship. Then, they had to attend college for a year and maintain a “B” average before they could qualify for the NEXT year. Finally, about two years ago, they were allowed to compete on equal footing with other public and private school students to gain the scholarship for their freshman year. Georgia University System colleges continue to discriminate against non-accredited home schoolers and often accept them on the condition of paying for a year of “remedial” non-accredited courses to “accredit” them. THIS IS A SCAM! A friend’s daughter who had a 1300 OLD SAT score was forced to do this. She graduated college with a 4.0 and is now a successful CPA. By the way, she and her family paid CASH for her education. She even turned down a full scholarship at a private college. Public and private school is always a “step down” for most home schoolers.

Realist

December 28th, 2010
11:23 am

Every entitlement program in this country is in crisis – from Social Security to Medicare to HOPE. The problem of course stems from the fact that all were set up basically as vote-buying thievery schemes disguised as “socially positive” safety net programs. Social Security was sold as a safety net for the “widows and orphans” (a line my delusional mother-in-law still spews forth as if channelling the ghost of that scumbag FDR. In fact it was just a way for FDR to buy the votes of the older generation, con the younger generation, and basically destroy the responsibility that children felt for the ongoing care and support of their parents. Meanwhile it also created a huge government employment scheme that perpetuates waste, fraud, and theft today.

Truly HOPE is no different. There were plenty of folks who wanted gambling in the state. Plenty of folks who never feel that there is enough money to throw down the rathole of government education. Plenty of folks who didn’t want to have to be responsible for planning for their kid’s college costs, and plenty of folks at colleges and universities who wanted a state subsidy for their waste that didn’t require direct theft from the citizens through the taxation mechanism.

So here we are. Every child feels entitled to a free college education. Every parent feels entitled to get the money for a free college education. Every college and university now plans on an easy $4000 or whatever that it doesn’t actually have to “earn.” A huge infrastructure now exists at gas stations, convenience stores, and the like to support the money transfer. Thousands are dependent on the program for their employment. The careers of many politicians are dependent on their continued support of the wealth transfer program.

And of course everyone has a solution that involves maximizing THEIR return with no regard for the inherently troubled nature of the program in general.

The fights over HOPE will be a wonderful case study in why america is so in debt, so morally bankrupt, and so headed over the cliff financially. It would be fun to watch except that the government has absolutely no problem in stealing whatever it wants to keep its supporters happy and rich. And unfortunately I am likely to be one of the ones taken from as always.

Really amazed

December 28th, 2010
11:23 am

Raising gpa would only lead to more grade inflation. 84 instead of 80, would mean that teachers would be pressured into inflation even more!!! Add SAT min as well as 3.0. gpa. I still don’t see how being poor should have an effect on lower sat/gpa. Just because a student comes from a less income household, doesn’t make that child less academically abled. Plus, these families have the Pell grant. HOPE is merit not fin. aid.

gamom

December 28th, 2010
11:34 am

To Teach = I like your idea! My son has been able to maintain hope and will likely have to decide in his senior year, whether he is going to drag out his college career so he can work and save up money so he can finish. I think this is a bad message to send to students who have already put the time and effort in.

30327

December 28th, 2010
11:39 am

If we’re going to incorporate a standardized test I’d prefer the ACT to the SAT. At least it is curriculum based and actually tests these kids on things they’ve learned while in high school.

There are cases for and against, both with valid points.

Grasshopper

December 28th, 2010
11:46 am

Realist at 11:23…

Amen. There are no truer posts on this blog.

Most posters are trying to figure out how to rig the system to their advantage.

Thanks for your wisdom.

30327

December 28th, 2010
11:49 am

The 2+2 programs at Georgia Perimeter and partnering 4 year schools (Georgia State, etc) are excellent alternatives for those kids who make the grade but don’t have the test scores to get in a 4 yr college. HOPE would still pay their tuition, and they’d have an upper hand at entering the work force or a 4yr degree program since they’ve already earned one. This would not only save HOPE $ but would save the student $ as well. Win-win situation that I think more and more students are becoming hip to.

john konop

December 28th, 2010
12:03 pm

I would hope we all agree the goal of hope is to help students gain skills to create the best work force in Georgia. I do not think anyone can show me a correlation between the highest GPA verse the person becoming a successful worker and or student.

I would not change the standard. It seems to make more sense to take the money and split up by % for kids who qualify. This would keep the hope alive for more kids and any kid can get a part time job to make up the difference.

…… Over the last several decades many researchers have tested the relationship between college GPA and various measures of adult achievement. The most common criterion measures include job success in business, teaching, engineering, and medicine as measured by salary level and supervisory ratings. Other, less common measures include social activity, civic participation, cultural interests and general satisfaction.

Qualitative review of the published literature leads to confusion in stating the true effect of GPA as a predictor of later success. In some cases GPA is positively correlated with success on the job (Harrell, 1969, 1970, 1972; Harrell, Harrell, McIntyre, & Weinburg, 1974) while in other cases significant negative correlations are shown (Pfeffer, 1977; Jepson, 1951).…..

http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst;jsessionid=63038F5434953150A08AC43CC3B578D6.inst3_3b?docId=5000107908

• ……No, there is NOT a strong correlation between GPA and college success rates or graduation rates. Part of this has to do with grade inflation and the difference in grading expectations at different schools, and much of it has to do with the quality of education and actual preparation for college that you find at various schools……..

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101207221023AASNAh1

EattheRich

December 28th, 2010
12:03 pm

Just add needs testing. If you don’t qualify for a Pell, you don’t qualify for Hope. The current reality of the mostly poor lottery players paying for rich people’s kids to go to Tech and UGA is obscene.

Mike R

December 28th, 2010
12:05 pm

So funny to see so many posts with people whining like babies, it’s pretty simple, HOPE has issues because there is more money going out than coming in, that’s it, no conspiracy, nobody stealing the money, it’s not being given to certain people and not to others, the Republicans aren’t stealing the money, it’s not being given to rich kids and not to poor kids, either you qualify with a 3.0 average or you don’t, that simple…

30327

December 28th, 2010
12:08 pm

Realist, your argument would hold merit except HOPE isn’t a government funded program like the ones you’re comparing it to. You can choose not to play the lottery if you’re against all things HOPE. It costs you nothing, except maybe aggravation if you force yourself onto a blog about it :-|

Grasshopper

December 28th, 2010
12:20 pm

30327 at 12:08

Wrong.

HOPE is a government sponsored program run by the state government. Play it or not all Georgians have skin in the game.

30327

December 28th, 2010
12:21 pm

Well, I was a poor kid who went to college on a full scholarship out of state. HOPE did not keep me here. If my husband’s business wasn’t based in midtown Atlanta I probably would have never returned to my native Georgia. My younger brother earned his degree from Georgia Tech. He now works for the DOD… in Dubai. HOPE did not keep him here, either :lol: The problem with the rationale for creating HOPE is that it doesn’t guarantee you will keep your top talent here. I’m sure the intentions were good, but that’s a recipe for disaster. And here we are.

By the way, the Mega Millions is $169 million tonight :lol: record profits and six figure bonuses as a result, but somehow there isn’t enough $. Yeah right.

Toto: speakin' the truth to power

December 28th, 2010
12:22 pm

“In my experiences, the upper class, high performing student is not interested in post secondary education in Georgia. No offense to anyone.”

The real truth:
“In my experience, the nouveau rich yankee losers (who can’t afford rent on the one-bedroom New Jersey flat so they come to Jawjah to buy up cheap real estate) are still trying to prove their significance in the world by living cheaply in the South so they can try to send their kids back to blizzard country to attend Northern schools that produce such luminaries as Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Barry Obama, John Kerry, Ted “buy me a drink” Kennedy, etc. etc.”

By the way, I grew up in “30327″. My family made a fortune selling their real estate to “upper clASSES like you. Thanks!

Double Zero Eight

December 28th, 2010
12:26 pm

@ 30327
Boast not thouself of tomorrow for thou knowest not what a day may bring forth.

30327

December 28th, 2010
12:35 pm

Welp, so much for the “real truth.”

Epic fail, Toto.

30327

December 28th, 2010
12:36 pm

Double Zero, please see my 12:28

Grasshopper, how so? Do we pay taxes on it?

Grasshopper

December 28th, 2010
12:40 pm

Georgians pay taxes to run the state government.
The state government spends time, money and manpower running the lottery.
Ergo…Georgians pay taxes to run the lottery.

Late to the Party

December 28th, 2010
12:43 pm

The outcome of giving HOPE to middle and upper income students has been to improve student quality in GA universities – after 15 years on faculty at UGA, I can assure you that did happen even if a few slipped through the net. But another outcome has been that more good students were able to afford to go on to professional school (medical, dental, veterinarian, law) or graduate school. Because they didn’t take on large loans as undergraduates, they could take on loans for graduate and professional school more readily. The end result is a better educated Georgia.

Lower income kids should and do attend college on HOPE but their ambition usually ends with an undergraduate degree, which they often can’t finish because all growing up their parents or guardians didn’t provide the same level of educational support as middle income and higher income kids received. Those who finish university should definitely be counted as HOPE success, but even those who just get a foot in the door and attend for a year have learned about college and what it will take to succeed, sometimes they come back years later and finish that degree. HOPE helps all income levels of Georgia students.

Selfish

December 28th, 2010
12:46 pm

I think HOPE is making the difference for a lot of kids to get into college, if not finish it, and that is worth something in making people aware of their options in life.

Don’t pass the DREAM act however, if you don’t want to see those HOPE dollars stretched a lot more thinly. Right now the number of children of illegal immigrants in Georgia is quite small, but if the DREAM act passes and all kids have to do is graduate from a Georgia HS with a B average to quality, then there will be a population shift into Georgia to take advantage of HOPE.

Toto: speakin' the truth to power

December 28th, 2010
12:48 pm

@30327
Just read this blog regularly. What I wrote stands. It is obvious you absorbed the same snobbery from your “out of state” school. Also, if your are not at least third generation, you are not Southern. I guess your foray out of state was also an “epic fail”. By your own admission, YOU ARE STILL HERE!

Toto: speakin' the truth to power

December 28th, 2010
12:53 pm

Oops. Typo- that’s “you” not “your”.

magpie

December 28th, 2010
12:58 pm

All of this talk about UGA. Do people understand just how poorly UGA stacks up against the good state schools and private universities? This is not to suggest that students should not aspire to go there and get a good education. However, do folks just have no clue as to how far behind Georgia is educationally — from its high schools through its universities?

30327

December 28th, 2010
1:02 pm

I’m a snob based on what? My internet moniker? Continue making brash ASSumptions if you think it’ll make your (non) point. Toto the omniscient one, laugh of the day.

True Grits

December 28th, 2010
1:04 pm

OK here’s a clue: increase the Georgia Lottery’s income. Make the games more interesting so more people will play. A lot of the buzz wore off as people gradually figured out that their odds of actually winning anything are infinitesimally small. Instead of a single huge blockbuster winning ticket, redesign the games so that there are many more smaller winners. Sure, HOPE needs to be tweaked on the expenditure side but I’m convinced the revenue side can be vastly improved also.

Toto: speakin' the truth to power

December 28th, 2010
1:10 pm

@magpie
Please give us specifics. Just which “good state schools and universities” do you refer to? What are the statistics showing “how far behind Georgia is educationally”? Do you include private and home schools as well? Do you consider anyone who moves to Georgia to be stupid? Are you new to Georgia?

30327

December 28th, 2010
1:17 pm

True Grits, the lottery has seen record profits since the recession. Ga lottery employees received close to 3 million in bonuses last year. Margaret DeFrancisco, president of the Georgia Lottery, received a bonus of $236500 on top of her $286000 salary. The money is THERE.

Grasshopper

December 28th, 2010
1:18 pm

Great ideas True Grits!

Find more interesting ways to suck the money out of the idiots’ pockets that play the lottery; trick them into thinking their odds are better at becoming a millionaire for buying a stupid pice of paper instead of actually working for it.

All so you don’t have to pay for your own childs education.

30327

December 28th, 2010
1:18 pm

“Do you consider anyone who moves to Georgia to be stupid? Are you new to Georgia?”

Foaming at the mouth.

Toto: speakin' the truth to power

December 28th, 2010
1:30 pm

@ 30327
I totally agree with you on the lottery bonuses. Do a little more research and you will find that some state lotteries are run by non-US entities. U.S. citizens in general are suckers, not just Georgians.

For real?

December 28th, 2010
3:38 pm

“No one likes my money-saving idea — once students lose HOPE in college, they can’t regain it. Parents tell me about their son’s killer semester at Tech or their daughter’s bad spell at UGA and argue that students deserve a second chance at HOPE”

Of course nobody likes your idea. What about the students who don’t get HOPE after high school, and their only chance is to work their butts off in college to be able to apply after 30 semester hours.

Also, I currently have HOPE, and it certainly isn’t “free.” Sure… it covers all of my tuition and “fees” so therefore it IS “nearly free” What HOPE doesn’t pay for, I do. Which happens to be about $500 per semester at GA State. So to cut it even more would really hurt those who already have it and would actually not even motivate them to try as hard.

Also, I don’t like the fact that you’re saying certain majors are harder than others. It really depends on the person. Obviously, if you’re really bad at something, then you aren’t going to major in it. DUH. For example, English is probably difficult for a math major, like math is for an english major.

Also, the DeKalb lawmaker doesn’t know what he’s talking about. The SAT has no relevance to intellignece whatsoever. I don’t even know why it is a requirement to get into most GA colleges. I know someone who graduated high school with a 4.5 GPA (an AP/IB student) who BOMBED the SAT. It is not a very good thing to judge by. I know that my SAT score would probably not be good enough either, even though I currently have a 3.88 GPA in college.

Seriously?!? This whole article is dumb.

For real?

December 28th, 2010
3:50 pm

I meant to say that it covers all of tuition and SOME fees. And that $500 extra is going to the college… it doesn’t even take into account the 500 more that goes into books.

Maureen Downey

December 28th, 2010
3:55 pm

@For real, Actually, you have it backwards. SAT scores do align pretty well with IQ, so they do, in fact, have relevance to intelligence. What they don’t have relevance to is effort, which is how you can have a friend with a 4.5 GPA and a low SAT.
(But the fact is that kids who score at the top end on the SAT typically do well in college. You will not see too many kids with 1,500 and higher struggling in college.)
And if you have a 3.88 in college, then you ought to have grasped the simple fact that something will have to be cut from HOPE. It cannot remain at this level because the money is running out. I didn’t see any suggestions from you on how to cut millions from HOPE.
Maureen

Toto: Ding Dong the witch is dead! (Almost)

December 28th, 2010
4:43 pm

Dorothy! Put on those SILVER dancing shoes and tin foil hat! Buy silver and fund your kid’s education…
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/jp-morgan-admits-defeat-cuts-silver-short-position-proves-millions-conspiracy-theorists-abso

Shannon

December 28th, 2010
5:04 pm

Here’s an unpopular suggestion.

Stop pretending that every idiot in the world has an equal right to weigh in on this question and leave it up to educational experts. Fully fund state colleges so they don’t have to increase tuition and you won’t have to cut HOPE at all.

As to cutting pre-K programs? Don’t listen to people who don’t know anything. Those programs are one of the few equalizers to help lower-income children develop some of the skills that middle-income children get at home.

But really, stop asking non-experts to make public policy. Just read through these comments. Morons.

Toto: Ding Dong the witch is dead! (Almost)

December 28th, 2010
5:16 pm

Shannon,

I am impressed with your erudite comments. Have you read the U.S. or state Constitutions? The “educational experts” are voted on and funded by We the People. Socialist money grubbers like yourself don’t deserve to live in this country.

TopSchool

December 28th, 2010
7:35 pm

I think HOPE is what Beverly Hall needed a couple of months ago…and I think HOPE is as corrupt as those in positions of administration within Atlanta Public Schools. They are all picking from the same money tree.

Get real hopeful…cause I think the DEAL is going to show you how all this operates.
and won’t be pretty for those living outside of the in house “GANG”

Hide and Watch how they “do it” on the Northside of Atlanta.
http://www.TopPublicSchoolCorruptionAtlanta.com

TopSchool

December 28th, 2010
7:38 pm

and i dont apologizzz for pour grammer…get the point

There is a message in here …yous just gotsta figure it out.

TopSchool

December 28th, 2010
7:40 pm

brer rabbit and the tar baby…
Now i loves to read that story…

TopSchool

December 28th, 2010
7:44 pm

Tar-Baby ain’t sayin’ nuthin’, en Brer Fox he lay low.

“`How duz yo’ sym’tums seem ter segashuate?’ sez Brer Rabbit, sezee.

“Brer Fox, he wink his eye slow, en lay low, en de Tar-Baby, she ain’t sayin’ nuthin’.

“‘How you come on, den? Is you deaf?’ sez Brer Rabbit, sezee. ‘Kaze if you is, I kin holler louder,’ sezee.

“Tar-Baby stay still, en Brer Fox, he lay low.

“‘You er stuck up, dat’s w’at you is,’ says Brer Rabbit, sezee, ‘en I;m gwine ter kyore you, dat’s w’at I’m a gwine ter do,’ sezee.

“Brer Fox, he sorter chuckle in his stummick, he did, but Tar-Baby ain’t sayin’ nothin’.

“‘I’m gwine ter larn you how ter talk ter ’spectubble folks ef hit’s de las’ ack,’ sez Brer Rabbit, sezee. ‘Ef you don’t take off dat hat en tell me howdy, I’m gwine ter bus’ you wide open,’ sezee.

“Tar-Baby stay still, en Brer Fox, he lay low.

Angela

December 28th, 2010
9:45 pm

in reply to comments on page 2 or so, one does not have to be “affluent” to pay for college out of pocket. There is a noble concept that should be a staple in this society and its called living within your means. Every American is afforded the opportunity to save for large purchases or investments. Even if you work at McDonald’s. If you are in debt and depend on government entitlements, that was your choice. Save your nickels and pay for your education. There is no law that states you have to be enrolled full time, nor do you have to complete your education within 4 yrs when paying out of pocket.

Again, Americans cannot have their cake and eat it too. You can’t gripe about government involvement then whine because they won’t pay for your education.

another comment.

December 30th, 2010
3:05 am

@toto; I will always be a proud Yankee who graduated 5th in my Engineering Program from the #1 Program in the Country and was recruited by an Atlanta Company over Tech graduates. Sorry, they didn’t hire Tech graduates. My SAT Verbal and Math scores were way above the Georgia average, so were my GMAT and LSAT ones that I have taken. I have one child that has scored in the 99% on the MATH IOWA tests. They both always score above 92-96 % on their IOWA tests. The CRT and EOST are irrelovent tests. I also scored the highest test score ever on the NY state History Regents Exam.

This is a blog, not a place looking for writing perfection. My point was HOPE is for Scholars, not students who need remediation. Colleges that do not have a graduation rate of 80% in 6 years should not be eligible. Another criteria should be a student loan default rate of over 7-8%. Schools like Emory, Mercer, Spellman, SCAD save the State money by Georgia students attending with a Hope Scholarship. However, this simple equation seams to be beyond some of you.

What many of you are missing is many small business owners can manipulate their adjusted gross income down to below an income cap of $75k or $50K even low enough to get Pell Grants for college, with the help of a good CPA. It’s is fairly simple if you know graduate level Accounting, Finance, Tax classes, that the BMW, Mercedes are all company cars, so is the home office. Grandma and Grandpa made gifts to Westminster and Lovett for that tuition it corresponds to the gift limit.) So alot of rich kids would still get the hope even with a Cap on income, it would just hurt people who would for a corporation in an upper middle income job.

Yes, with Hope Scholarship it is affordable, but without it, other schools become contenders. Is what I am saying.

[...] posted here: Legislature can’t omit a HOPE predicament any longer – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blo… This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged georgia, hope, legislature, money, number, [...]

bug

January 3rd, 2011
2:56 am

Here again the government wants to throw more money at the problem enstead of solving the problem.

They know 40% of the first year hope students a failing because parents have put pressure on high school administrators to change their childs grades to it averages out to 3.0. The administrator forces the teacher to change the grades.

The higher education committee in the house of representatives should introduce a bill to with hold state funds from the high school equal to the amount of HOPE funds paid in for failed students the previous year.

You cut off the money to the school doing the grade changing and it will stop.

Ben

January 4th, 2011
9:05 am

Figures. The last good thing our state ever did and they completely let it get to the point of disaster.

Capitol Hill is worthless.

math teacher

January 4th, 2011
9:35 am

I attended college in Alabama on a math scholarship with the understanding that for every 2years I taught in Alabama 1 year of scholarship would be forgiven.
I choose to not teach in AL but instead came to GA to teach
My Scholarship reverted to a student loan and I had to repay it in full. Seems to me the basic concept could be applied here. Loose HOPE and becomes a student loan and has to be repaid (maybe even give the 2nd chance)
That seems fair to me, after all education is not a right but a privilege to be earned.
Also it seems to me the only way a student who has to take remedial classes got into college is with inflated grades and should NOT receive HOPE funds for those classes. Thats my take on it.

Dave from GT

January 4th, 2011
9:44 am

You get what you pay for.

You value what you pay your own money for.

There was a time when people had a hard time getting into Georgia Tech in order to have the privelege of paying their own money for that education – even out of state !

You find out real quick if that is your passion under those circumstances.

It also put some free market pressure on the system !

Perhaps the State should go back to letting the laws of supply and demand work.

Except……… the farmers and tree huggers that want to go to UGA may not be able to scare up the price of admission !

The Producer

January 4th, 2011
9:57 am

Maybe there is HOPE in the OAKEY WOODS area….See Gov. Perdue…….

Carolyn

January 4th, 2011
9:59 am

Yes, stop the obscene bonuses to lottery executives. But, another issue you have are “public” high schools “giving” grades to the students so they “qualify”. (Yes, they get the boo hoo stories, how the child won’t get the “HOPE” is they don’t make this grade.) Hence, you have how many students with a “B” average having to take so many remedial classes? It’s very clear. If your raise the requirement to 3.2, they’ll pad them just as much.
Stop lowering the standards of education and let people know, you have to put forth effort or guess what? You may fail. Maybe if you fail, you’ll learn you have to work to succeed in life!

SMK

January 4th, 2011
10:01 am

I’m sure there may be grade inflation happening at some high schools, but it is definitely not an issue at my daughter’s school. She’s a smart kid who takes honors and gifted classes and has about a 2.9 GPA. Her friend, who admits herself she is not as smart as my daughter, has a 3.8 GPA – the difference? She takes all college prep classess. Now, I could let my daughter take college prep classes so she would have a 3.8 GPA – but then, she wouldn’t be ready for the rigors of college and would likely do poorly her first year. So – all of you who think a “B” average makes somebody a scholar should maybe look a little closer. There is no reward in the GPA for taking harder classes. My friend’s daughter is taking 5 AP classes her senior year and acing all of them. Yes, she’ll get college credit for those – but it should also show up in her GPA. My daughter wants to go to college and get her degree in education and be a Special Education teacher. She may not be able to do that without the Hope. We make a good income and therefore will very likely qualify for little to no financial aid, but we are not wealthy. If she or we can get loans, then we’d absolutely be willing to pay for her school ourselves (I paid for my own education, Bachelor’s and Master’s), but it’s gotten hard for anybody with a decent job to get financial assistance. Yes, I know in some of your dream worlds, we should all have saved up for our kids’ college since the day they were born and pay cash – and believe me, I wish I would have. But, we didn’t. So it sounds to me like some of you are saying that since she’s a “C” student, my daughter should go to work at 18, and skip out on being a teacher because she’s not academically qualified. However, her goofy little friend with the 3.8 can go to college and maybe get an English degree (which I have, by the way – people with English degrees can actually add value to the economy), or maybe drop out after her freshman year. I totally agree that the Hope should be paid back if the student doesn’t earn a degree. I think there could be a requirement about them working in Georgia for a period of time after their graduation . . . I think that GPA ought to be weighted for course difficulty, and I have no problem with ACT or SAT being a factor (my daughter hasn’t taken either of these tests yet – she’s a junior in HS). I think the Hope ought to be reduced by grants and scholarships – nobody should be getting paid to go to college, at least not with Hope money. I’m fine with no Hope for private schools. I agree more controls should be in place to make sure the right amount of money is going to scholarships and not to administration of the program – the bonuses are ridiculous. How can you get a bonus if you’ve run your program out of money? Bottom line – would like to see it fixed and hope we can get that 2.9 up in time if it’s still around next year. She’ll have to do it with some hard work since I can’t just slip her teacher a $20….

pj

January 4th, 2011
10:26 am

Keep and expand the Pre-K! That is more important than funding college educations.

Call it like it is

January 4th, 2011
12:54 pm

Hmmmm How about we pull the reins back on the schools themselves?? Anybody check out the campus of Kennesaw since the Hope scam started up?
They are now triple the size.
Triple the tution
Parking fees applied no matter if you even have a car
Student fees
Athletic fees
300% markup on text books.

Its pretty easy to see where hope money has gone. Its gone into the pockets of school administrators. If you want to make cuts, make them at the source of the problem, the colleges themselves.

teacher

January 4th, 2011
3:40 pm

Getting rid of pre k makes more sense than taking away college opportunities.

Darleen Prem

January 8th, 2011
9:21 am

My son is in the graduating class of 2012. They have tortured them with this complete ridiculous NEW ciricculm by telling them it will help them with college. What college? Oh, they mean the rich kids? As usual, keep poverty perpetuation, and move on the kids who have parents with money. I don’t know why this is a discussion, simply reduce the payout and put the rest into HOPE. And do away with PreK, afterall, unless there parents are rich they aren’t going to go to college anyway, so who cares if a 4 year old can spell CAT.