Can schools pay their bills with more flexibility?

One of the most pungent commenters on education issues in the state is former Henry County superintendent Herb Garrett, who is now executive director of the Georgia School Superintendents Association

In response to the prospect of more school cuts and the pledge of Gov.-elect Nathan Deal to grant schools more flexibility rather than more money, Garret said, “We’ve been getting some flexibility now for several years and Georgia Power just won’t accept flexibility as payment for electric bills.”

The relentless cuts to education come at a time when the state and feds are making unprecedented demands on schools to educate more students to higher standards. Can those goals be met with the larger class sizes and diminished resources that have resulted from the deep cuts to education spending in Georgia?

That is the question facing our schools today. And it has a new urgency now that Deal says state finances are so bad that he predicts even deeper cuts to education.

Here is the latest AJC story on the bleak education picture:

Deal’s forecast — though absent specifics — came as educators across the state are still adjusting to major changes — such as bigger classes, condensed school years and furloughs or layoffs — that many districts were forced to implement this year to trim budgets.

Budget cuts from the state are not new, partly because of declining revenue during the recession, as well as austerity cuts that have been in place since 2003. At least for the past five years, local school districts have been shorted millions that they were due under the Quality Basic Education Act, the state formula for funding public education.

For the current fiscal year, the districts were shorted a combined $915 million. That’s on top of state cuts of $654.1 million in fiscal 2010, $93 million in fiscal 2009, $143 million in fiscal 2008 and $170 million in fiscal 2007, according to records of the state Department of Education.

“We’ve seen a radical decline in state funding for public education over the last seven or eight years, to the point that the state’s QBE funding formula has little meaning anymore,” said Jay Dillon, a spokesman for the Cobb County School District. “At this point, there are few options remaining if the state again decides to cut funding for Cobb schools by tens of millions of dollars.”

Since 2003, Cobb has not received $280 million that it was due in QBE funding, Dillon said.

Herb Garrett, executive director of the State School Superintendents Association, said Wednesday that additional cuts are likely to hurt across the board.

“It hurts everybody, but it really hurts the poor systems, the ones that don’t have a very good property tax base to try to cushion the blow,” Garrett said.

Since his election in November, Deal has been going over the details of an amended budget for the current year and a 2012 spending plan that he will submit to the General Assembly in January. On Tuesday, he warned that “tough choices” will be coming in education spending, though he pledged to give local school districts more flexibility with the money they receive from the state.

– By Maureen Downey, the AJC Get Schooled blog

105 comments Add your comment

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
9:42 am

If we are going to get serious about education and competing with nations that are leaving us in the dust, and do it with less money, at what point do we talk about eliminating all sports programs from k-12? I have no numbers about what these cost, but at this point every non-essential-to-education program must be up for elimination. If we keep doing things just because that’s how we always have, we will fail to keep up with a changing world.

catlady

December 9th, 2010
9:51 am

Eliminate sports programs, eliminate “services” such as academic coaches, speech therapy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, counseling and nurses. Yes, they do provide significant assistance, but we can’t afford them! Eliminate half of the CO jobs. Get rid of assistant principals, and terminate ALL travel and workshops. Cut the school week to 4 days. THEN, let’s talk about cutting teachers….

Just A Teacher

December 9th, 2010
9:54 am

Can the school systems sue the state for failing to provide QBE funds?

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ed. Innovations, LLC, Maureen Downey. Maureen Downey said: Can schools pay their bills with more flexibility? http://bit.ly/ftTqdm [...]

Y oh Y

December 9th, 2010
10:12 am

Eliminate senior exemptions on property taxes. Property does not have a differenct age by property.

Extend sales taxes to internet purchases which are technically subject to USE tax. Make it simple.

End the Robin Hood method of state funds to public systems. Give every child in GA the same amount fo funds and we can eliminate the school ssytems that cannot pay for themselves.

Hey Teacher

December 9th, 2010
10:14 am

Flexibility does not provide funds for basics like dry erase markers (which I had to buy myself this year). I know of many systems that have cut ALL funding for basic supplies (pens, chalk, overhead transparencies). Field trips have already been cut in my system. Guess the next step is to turn off the heat!

Lynn43

December 9th, 2010
10:14 am

Just because a student can make a “nice” score on a standardized test does not mean that he/she is educated. We are charged with educating all students, and this means that every child no matter what his/her talent area needs instruction to develop this talent. We also need to prepare many to be ready to join the workforce as soon as they graduate, therefore, many technical offerings need to exist. We should be getting these students ready for life no matter which direction they may take, and concentrating on a few courses to pass a standardized does not prepare students for the workforce or to continue on to higher education.

Bruce Kendall

December 9th, 2010
10:17 am

Some of us knew in September of the coming cuts.

blackbird13 makes a good point and I briefly discussed that very subject with a local board member last night. What one may not understand or realize, the parents who have kids in extracurricular programs are very aggressive when defending their turf.

You could drop hard academic programs like Social Studies and hardly anyone would complain. However, just mention that you are considering reducing a sports program, and you will fill BoE meetings beyond capacity, with a need for police assistance to control the mob.

Why would elected officials fight for core academic programs, when it would infuriate so many of the electorate? They are not funding education now, and whom pray tell is holding their feet to the fire?

I do not know about you, but I will see one of my state representatives later today and will express my concern, and it won’t be for the first time.

TopPublicSchool

December 9th, 2010
10:28 am

Atlanta Public Schools solved this problem with segregation of Atlanta’s Northside Hispanic population.
Most of them won’t complain…as they are lucky to have made it over the boarder alive. Segregation on at the Northside APS schools. An idea created and implemented by the minority leadership in APS.
Figure this out…
Concealing Segregation/APS/Jackson Elementary
http://www.youtube.com/user/TopSchoolAtlanta and

Blatant Discrimination/Jackson/APS Leadership
http://www.youtube.com/user/TopSchoolAtlanta#p/u/7/0tCFMSuQBTQ

http://www.TopPublicSchoolCorruptionAtlanta.com

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
10:34 am

“What one may not understand or realize, the parents who have kids in extracurricular programs are very aggressive when defending their turf.”

Oh, I definitely understand it. A parent in another nearby state with even worse budget problems than ours said she would put her kid in private school if they cut football or basketball. Interesting that those are the cuts that would motivate her to act, not the cuts to real education opportunities.

Student Advocate

December 9th, 2010
10:36 am

Speech, occupational, physical therapy and nursing services are federally mandated health related education services for students with disabilities to attend school per the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. These are not luxury services and are non-negotiable for school districts.

Gwinnett Teacher

December 9th, 2010
10:37 am

Not sure what this means to you guys. But I have been a northern transplant who came down to teach here in GA. I have aspirations of eventually running my own school, but will not here. We live in America and I understand times are tight, but to run an effective school is no different then any other business. It needs money. If the state govenrment will not support education then I will find another state that will.
I know I am fortunate to have a job and luckier then others. But to ask a teacher to compete with other states that spend significantly more per student is difficult. Here are 2 charts to look at. The first is from 2001-02 and then the 2nd is 05-06. Gerogia during that period dropped from 26th to 36th and have been cutting ever since.
http://www.epodunk.com/top10/per_pupil/
http://www.edweek.org/rc/articles/2009/01/21/sow0121.h27.html

I know things are difficult, but simply to offer tax cuts to businesses, just to neglect the fundemental educational system is crazy. Reducing the money spent per student is not going to pull GA out of the bottom of education.

HS Public Teacher

December 9th, 2010
10:38 am

What a question!

Let’s see…. without flexibility (which is what Deal assumes we had before him), the people in charge of school systems in GA awarded themselves pay raises and bonuses and cars and conferences and etc. All the while, teachers were furloughed, class sizes increased, teachers pay were frozen, etc.

With more flexibility, somehow money will be saved? Somehow the people in charge of school systems will make better decisions?

Wow! Is there any end to the stupidity of the republicans in Georgia?

ChristieS.

December 9th, 2010
10:40 am

Maybe when districts begin to close schools for lack of funding and someone’s little darlings have to get up an hour earlier to catch a bus to a school 45 minutes away, folks will begin to see the big picture.

What's best for kids?

December 9th, 2010
10:45 am

Hey, Student Advocate,
When we are spending upwards to 36k on an individual student while the majority of students’ funding is being cut to the bone, then we have to make some tough choices. The feds mandate a heck of a lot more than they subsidize, so we are in a bit of a conundrum, aren’t we?
Occupational therapissts can be given a bigger case load. Physical therapists can be given a bigger case load. Nursing services are NOT federally mandated, either.

Dr NO

December 9th, 2010
10:46 am

This is just another big crock propogated by these egg-head education enablers. Just as in business and everything else in life one must make do with what is available.

No doubt there are plenty of areas in which to cut or eliminate costs and why should Fed or State programs be the exception. Lets begin with teacher and administators and supers salaries…most of these are HIGHLY overpaid.

These pitiful arguments and hand-wringing amount to a mental landfill.

Dee DeLeGal

December 9th, 2010
10:47 am

85% of your taxpayers funds go to the funding of salaries in our schools then we want to complain about our children not getting an education. The problem is you can not get an education only within the confines of a building and classroom it takes the parents participation at home. Cut the sports and other extra curricular activities for one or two years to see what results you get from your students. If those parents want them so much let them pay for them or have local business sponsor them. As for the senior citzens remember they have already done their part by providing you with a place for your education not it is your turn to do it for your children. The free rides are over take a deep breath folks it is going to be a long one.

d2

December 9th, 2010
10:49 am

What about the Perdue appointees? How much raise did they receive? What about the ones from the Ag office? How much raise did they receive? All these created posts? How much does a “transition team” cost Georgia? How many advisers do we have to pay? What about the unecessary testing that is required by the state? How much does that cost? Do we need both ITBS, CRCT, and the bunch of others? What about putting a limit on how much a school county chief makes? What about the paid bloggers the state hires? How much do we pay for them? THANK GOD for the Football hall of fame.

Lee

December 9th, 2010
10:57 am

Sorry, no sympathy here. For years, many of us on this blog have been questioning our school system expenditures. Bloated Central Office staffs, $80/90/100k + salaries for folks that have no basis in market realities.

Interesting that the topic of athletics was brought up. Just this week, my hometown newspaper included a story of how our local BOE was touring the facilities in anticipation of spending SPLOST dollars. One recurring theme was upgrades to athletic facilities.

You’re furloughing teachers but going to build a new field house. Really??

It’s always interesting to peruse salaries: http://www.open.georgia.gov/

A few nuggets:

ESOL $110 million. There is a cost to having 20-30 million ILLEGAL aliens waltzing across our borders. Add another $10 million for INTERPRETERS to that figure.

In-School Suspension teachers – $21.6 million. For a glorified study hall monitor? High was $97k for one individual.

APS – Business Services Secretary / Clerk $92k + $16k reimbursement. For a SECRETARY????

APS – Public Relations $740k

APS – Security Officer, two made over $100k

Cobb – 26 Fin/Bus Svc Mgr at a total cost of $1.8 million.

You could spend all day on that site and find enough waste equal to the Gross National Product of some countries.

When they start handing out pink slips to head coaches, then I might say they are serious about cutting expenditures. Until then…..

catlady

December 9th, 2010
10:57 am

Student advocate: I understand that those are required by federal law, however, as I understand it the government is billed for those services by the provider, through the school system. Just take it outside of school, as it should be, and let providers come to the home. Providing for the child is a parental function, not a school one. Schools should provide educational opportunities, and any “impediments” (whatever they may be) is for the parent to take care of, with whatever help the government can give.

randome thoughts

December 9th, 2010
10:58 am

Public education should focus on providing the “basic” education to all students – including academics, arts, physical education. Anything beyond the “basic,” – including extracurricular activities AND advance courses beyond the “basic” – should be fee-based. Parents of athletes, bands, etc. already pay some to have their kids participate in those programs. I think parents whose children are enrolled in AP courses should also pay fees.

Speaking of extra curricular activities, I would support making those more of community activities – much like what you see in Europe. Let schools lease their facility to those community programs. Basically extend Little Leagues etc. to HS age groups, too.

Love conquers all

December 9th, 2010
10:59 am

To whom less is given, expect an increase in wrongful doings. In other words, if we are lacking in a good education what can one become without it. This increases the criminal mentality because they too(criminals) have to survive. I do not condone wrong by any means but please understand what we are creating in our society. Lack of funding in such an important aspect as education, while the rich gets richer is a very selfish and dangerous dream. In today’s reality, just continue to watch the news and you will soon understand that our duly elected officials are going about it in the wrong way. Everyone must be cared for, not just some.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
11:05 am

“Let schools lease their facility to those community programs”

Great idea. And if removing the sports programs from the schools discourages participation, that is all to the good; perhaps more time would be spent on academics.

teacher&mom

December 9th, 2010
11:05 am

I may be misinformed but most sports programs support themselves. Our football program (and we don’t even have a “winning” program), followed by basketball revenues supports all sports (middle and high school) in our county. We are a small rural system and a home varsity game will easily rake in $5-6,000/per game. Eliminating sports won’t solve the problem.

clueless

December 9th, 2010
11:05 am

Meanwhile, according to Georgia Public Radio, state revenues have been up for the past few months. But still more cuts to education?

HS Public Teacher

December 9th, 2010
11:17 am

@clueless….

This has nothing to do with state revenues. It has everything to do with the republican agenda. And, that is to destroy public education piece by piece.

The economy and state revenues are only convenient excuses for them – real or not. And sadly, the Georiga voters will simply accept whatever these republicans say…. and then blame the democrats.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
11:17 am

“I may be misinformed but most sports programs support themselves.home varsity game will easily rake in $5-6,000/per game.”

You do realize that the amount you cited would not support even coaches salaries? Yeah, I know some coaches would remain as teachers, but not all. Plus you are not considering facility maintenance costs, utilities, referees, gas for bus trips, etc.
You are also not counting things like facility maintenance cost,

me

December 9th, 2010
11:22 am

Lee – Hall County had a substitute teacher making 109K a couple of years back. Too funny!

An American Patriot

December 9th, 2010
11:25 am

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
9:42 am
If we are going to get serious about education and competing with nations that are leaving us in the dust, and do it with less money, at what point do we talk about eliminating all sports programs from k-12? I have no numbers about what these cost, but at this point every non-essential-to-education program must be up for elimination. If we keep doing things just because that’s how we always have, we will fail to keep up with a changing world.

@blackbird13…..I think you need to do a little more research into sports expenditures at public schools…..the last time I heard, Ad Valorem TAXES collected from property owners for school systems cannot be used to fund extracurricular activities such as a football program……these have to be self-supporting…..this is why most high schools have booster clubs. Revenues derived from attendance is used to pay for uniforms, officials, field maintenance, etc. I say this to you and “Catlady”…..”this is not a very well thought out solution”

You know, right now our state has a budget deficit…..we’ve got to make it up someway or the other. I say we’ve got to cut expenditures across the board or raise taxes to get back in balance. School Systems are gonna have to cut out the fat…..all of ‘em have it, there’s just some tough choices to make and some don’t want to make ‘em.

Bill

December 9th, 2010
11:31 am

k-12 needs to be preserved as much as possible. But some of our colleges with only a 20-35% graduate rate after 6 yrs need to be closed down. Why pay colleges that let professors visit foreign lands for months and not working with students. If college professors do not want to work with kids we do not need them. They should put in 40 hours a week on campus working with kids.

DeKalb Educated

December 9th, 2010
11:31 am

In DEKALB County we could get rid of our TV show on cable, the people who run it and over half the Central office. When I was in school, we had two principals – not four at each high school. Eliminate bus service since we live in areas where kids can walk or ride bikes – much healthier, car pool or take MARTA if Mommy and Daddy can’t take them. Do we need so many security guards? Our local one has 2-3 guards riding around in golf carts. Have teachers who teach and get rid of the admin staff. No PR and Communications needed. Let each school run their own IT and get rid of area coordinators. Get rid of all coordinators – just let the teachers at the schools run their classrooms rather than all the extra layer of people paid high salaries just to shuffle paper and demand more paper from teachers. Without the micro managing, teachers can teach.

teacher&mom

December 9th, 2010
11:32 am

“You do realize that the amount you cited would not support even coaches salaries? Yeah, I know some coaches would remain as teachers, but not all. Plus you are not considering facility maintenance costs, utilities, referees, gas for bus trips, etc.
You are also not counting things like facility maintenance cost,”

You do realize that in smaller, rural systems (which make up the bulk of GA schools), most coaches (not “some”) also teach. Referees, gas, and maintenance fees are paid for out of the athletic funds….which is funded through ticket sales. Facilities in our county were built with SPLOSH funds. They are consistently used throughout the school day and on the weekends by different community organizations.

Mid GA Retiree

December 9th, 2010
11:36 am

So what is the answer? To stop cuts in education we cut or eliminate other state agencies? Which ones? Do that and the unemployment rate increases even more. Do we eliminate tax breaks for companies in Georgia? Do that and they go to other states, and again unemployment increases. Do you raise taxes on thoses of us that still have jobs? We are struggling to pay our bills now, increased costs for gas, groceries, utilities, etc. The property owner and worker winds up footing the bills for all of this. As a side note, my school system says it has cut positions in the central office, and eliminated teacher positions through attrition. I have walked through a couple of the schools in our district, as well as the central office. I have yet to see a single vacant classroom or office. I think that the central offices are protecting their own at the expense of the classrom teacher.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
11:46 am

Patriot:.”I think you need to do a little more research into sports expenditures at public schools”

This article is a few years old, but note that it mentions that Georgia football coaches are paid on average 55% more than other teachers (NOT including bonuses and perks from boosters), and a third have no other or minimal teaching duties. In no way do booster clubs and attendance foot the entire bill for sports.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
11:47 am

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
11:51 am

Oh, and just to be clear, we are only talking about monetary costs, not the time wasted for students who have no future in sports beyond high school (the vast majority) and yet are spending more time on athletics than studying.

sissyuga

December 9th, 2010
11:56 am

Football is not a subject. Cut the sports.

God Bless the Teacher!

December 9th, 2010
11:56 am

1) Stop paying folks for advanced degrees in areas for which they are not employed (e.g., current science teacher (T-4 level) getting paid for a PhD (T-7 level) in leadership). Such people should not be on the gravy train, and the savings in personnel costs would be TREMENDOUS.
2) Charge parents for each additional year, semester, or class it takes for their child to finish K-12 in 13 years (on time).
3) Have teachers pay out of pocket expenses for having a substitute. Talk about motivation to come to work every day!
4) Charge for parking at sporting events. I’ll bet parents will still pay to attend.

HS Public Teacher

December 9th, 2010
12:02 pm

Cutting sports overall really doesn’t save big money. The reason is that because for the most part, sports are self-sustaining…. they can generate enough revenue to pay for themselves.

What does cost big money that is not self-sustaining?

Foreign language departments – some of these departments are larger than the math departments in high school. Few colleges have a foreign language requirement any more. Is it good to know another language? Of course. But if something were to be cut, then I vote for this.

Music and theater departments – some of these departments require a lot of money…. for stages, materials, teachers, instruments, etc. Is it good to offer these? Of course. But if something were to be cut, then I vote for this.

Special education services – most all of these departments are the largest in all of high schools. I know that the law has certain requirements, but if the State budget is really that tight then maybe these laws should be changed. If something were to be cut, I vote for this.

Physical education – these facilities cost a lot to build and a lot to maintain. Even though our children are obese, if their parents don’t care, why should the public fund PE? I vote to cut this.

What should certainly NOT be cut? The basics such as math, English, science, and social studies. These are the 4 legs of the education stool. These should NEVER be touched until all else is totally cut out first.

HS Public Teacher

December 9th, 2010
12:10 pm

@God Bless The Teacher!

Your #1 is already implemented. No longer are teachers paid for higher degrees unless it is in the area of their current job.

You cannot be serious about your # 3… Teacher salaries are already low. And, they have been frozen for some time. And, teachers have been forloughed (work with no pay). And, teachers regularly pay for classroom supplies out-of-pocket due to cut backs. And, now you want a sick teacher to pay out-of-pocket for a substitute? Talk about rubbing salt into a wound! I think that this would create an even more severe teacher shortage of good/qualified teachers – who the heck would ever go in to such a profession????

say what?

December 9th, 2010
12:15 pm

@Dekalb educated- yep kids needs to walk on those newly installed sidewalks that Vernon Jones paid for with SPLOst funds. I see buses with 15-25 kids leaving the building. Buses need to be filled to capacity for better ROI. There have always been 3-4 APs in DeKalb schools ( I graduated in the 80s). Now what I don’t agree with is the AP of instruction, AP for Test administration, AP for each grade academy,etc. Since so many APs and Principals are always giving homage to the teaching staff they should be glad to get back in the classroom with all of the stellar knowledge they have received from on high. As contracts are annually, this is the year to give those APs a contract back into the classroom. The TV station could be privatized as I can not see much of what they do for the salaries.

School systems do need to review what is paid by the state and federal govt’, which are mandated services, and see where we can trim.

@Catlady- your attitude toward Special Needs students is the reason why there are so many mandates and lawsuits. But you are not alone; a DCSS BOE member says just the same (paraphrasing here: DCSS will never be good again because of special needs students). These attitudes of indifference toward those who are not like you will always be cause for policies on funding formulas, and who gets what. If it was not mandated that 1% of Title I funds be for parent involvement activities, that money would be spent on ribeye dinners for teacher appreciation (as was in the past).
And Parents are ultimately responsible for the education of the student, not the teacher. So how about we shut down public schools, make this a Homeschooling STATE, allowing teachers to practice their wares as tutor?

HS Public Teacher

December 9th, 2010
12:16 pm

@God Bless The Teacher!

I wonder why your suggestions did not include….

Cut pay of superintendents making more than $200,000 per year. Some of these jokers make almost half a million a year!

Cut all tax payer perks such as: free car, free trips to administration conferences (think Hawaii), sometimes two personal secretaries, etc.

Why do you immediately go to the pitiful front-line worker that is already abused?

teacher&mom

December 9th, 2010
12:21 pm

“3) Have teachers pay out of pocket expenses for having a substitute. Talk about motivation to come to work every day!”

Really??? So when my child was hospitalized last year, I should have dumped him off at the hospital and gone to work? What about funerals for parents/grandparents? Unfortunately I’ve already had the flu this year. Should I have come in to work during that time?

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
12:28 pm

“Cutting sports overall really doesn’t save big money. The reason is that because for the most part, sports are self-sustaining…. they can generate enough revenue to pay for themselves.”

But if jobs have to go, the jobs related to them should be the first to go. Most coaches teach p.e., which, again, if cuts have to be made, should also be the first to go. In fact, those cuts should have been made already.

God Bless the Teacher!

December 9th, 2010
12:38 pm

@ HS Public Teacher. I’m a teacher, and I know for a fact in my county teachers are grandfathered in to get paid according to the highest degree earned, regardless of current position. Many systems do this (I’ve work in three, and all three are doing it).

@ teach&mom. Just throwing out options. Do you honestly think any BOE will vote to cut athletics?

Sorry, Wrong Answer

December 9th, 2010
12:40 pm

@Teacher&Mom… Your numbers on sports programs being self-supporting don’t add up. You say you can gross $5,000 per varsity game. Let’s say your school plays 7 home games, or even 10 if you are in playoffs, so that’s $35,000 to $50,000, which pays for field and team equipment, field maintenance and utilities, concession licenses and health inspection, salaries for the head coach, assistant coaches, expendables like trainers supplies, chalk, stat sheets, etc., referee fees, summer and spring training, football team’s share of weight room facilities cost, and public safety (off duty police for crowd control).

This cash flow ($50,000 in, $200,000 out) rivals the miracle of the loaves and fishes. Maybe your athletic association should be managing the DOE budget.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
12:44 pm

“Do you honestly think any BOE will vote to cut athletics?”

Nope. But it needs to be pointed out, no matter how futile it is, that the priorities of our education system are completely out of whack, regardless of budgetary concerns.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
12:48 pm

@Sorry, Wrong Answer

It sure doesn’t add it up because it isn’t including salaries, which are higher than for other teachers. Go look at the audit reports. How many of these coaches are teaching anything else or are monitoring dodge ball games for a few hours?

HS Math Teacher

December 9th, 2010
12:52 pm

Maybe it’s time for the Gov. to propose a temporary state sales tax hike. When most systems have already cut to the bone, you’ve got to look at the revenue side of the equation. I don’t think any additional burden should be put squarely on property owners, especially in the poorer regions of the state.

TopPublicSchool

December 9th, 2010
12:55 pm

I did contact the Governor’s office…
Of course there is so much politics involved in this.
The GBI will not investigate possible misuse of funds by APS until a police report has been filed to them from the Atlanta Police Department

I called the Atlanta Police Department to report my concern.

They said…they do not handle anything to do with Atlanta Public Schools.
All of the issues involving APS are to be reported to the Atlanta Public Schools, Detective Unit.

I think this is TOTAL CORRUPTION.

Reporting possible wrong-doing to anyone holding hands with APS would not produce a fair investigation.

So, What to do now?
Any suggestions?

I hope someone within Governor Perdue’s office will investigate the information detailed on the Youtube Channel:

http://www.youtube.com/user/TopSchoolAtlanta#p/u
Concealing Segregation in Atlanta Public Schools

http://www.youtube.com/user/TopSchoolAtlanta#p/u/7/0tCFMSuQBTQ
Blatant Discrimination/Jackson/APS Leadership

The disgraceful leadership within Atlanta Public Schools under the umbrella of Dr. Beverly Hall has soiled our reputations as citizens of Atlanta, Georgia.

I am asking the governor to open a full investigation to unravel ALL PROBLEMS with the possible misuse of public funds and the possible segregation of our children in the Northside schools of APS.

http://www.TopPublicSchoolCorruptionAtlanta.com

Batgirl

December 9th, 2010
1:05 pm

No, teachers should not have to pay for substitutes when they’re sick, but what about those who regularly use sick leave to take personal time. Our principal and several teachers have young children, and every time there is a class party or play at their child’s school, thesse people have to take time out to attend. One teacher went on a church shopping trip to New York for two days last week, and I can promise you that at least 2-3 teachers will take a day off for Christmas shopping. Should we really be paying subs for this? I was out with the crud for a couple of days earlier in the year and had to shut down the library. No sub for me. For those of you wondering where the cuts will come next. I’m pretty sure it will be librarians.

What's best for kids?

December 9th, 2010
1:17 pm

Batgirl,
Teachers are given three to five personal days, and we should be able to take them as we see fit, since they’re personal and all. After that, though, I agree that we should not allow for sick time to be used for anything other than sick time.

teacher&mom

December 9th, 2010
1:50 pm

@Teacher&Mom… Your numbers on sports programs being self-supporting don’t add up. You say you can gross $5,000 per varsity game. Let’s say your school plays 7 home games, or even 10 if you are in playoffs, so that’s $35,000 to $50,000, which pays for field and team equipment, field maintenance and utilities, concession licenses and health inspection, salaries for the head coach, assistant coaches, expendables like trainers supplies, chalk, stat sheets, etc., referee fees, summer and spring training, football team’s share of weight room facilities cost, and public safety (off duty police for crowd control).”

OK…you’re talking to someone who doesn’t work in a 4A system so we don’t have concession licenses, etc. More like a 2A system on the verge of becoming a single A system.

The local churches and businesses pitch in and work the concession stands…all organized by the booster clubs. Uniforms, training equipment, etc…provided by the booster clubs.

Once a year the local doctors volunteer to complete all physicals after school. (not sure if this is what your reference to “health inspections” is referring to??)

We have 1 PE teacher at the elementary, 2 at the middle school, and 4 at the high school (based on numbers, we are paying for 2 PE teachers at the high school out of local funds). Supplements are very reasonable. Our baseball, softball, soccer, tennis, swimming, and wrestling programs are all coached by classroom teachers. We also utilize community coaches to fill in the gaps.

The $$ amount I gave was for basketball games. I’ve never kept the gate at a high school football game but a fellow teacher once told me that he collected over $10,000 one night at the “home” side gate. He estimated the game pulled in around $15 grand.

My point??? Cutting these positions will do very little to help our rural system save money. It also detracts from finding meaningful ways to fund education. Please remember that many systems in GA are located in rural areas. We don’t have the tax base to fund lots of “bells and whistles.” We also rely heavily on our community and local businesses to fund many “extras” at our school. We are strapped and while APS, Gwinnett, Cobb, Fulton, and others may be able to absorb more budget cuts, we have absorbed to the point of closing school a week early.

How many more days of instruction do we need to lose before someone decides enough is enough? I think it is time to expect our legislators and governor to get creative and come up with viable solutions. Hold their feet to the fire on this one.

It's Simple ... Raise Taxes

December 9th, 2010
2:00 pm

It’s the 800-pound gorilla in the room that no one wants to touch/mention. And don’t give me this crap about “we already pay too much in taxes…” NO WE DON’T! And I live in Fulton County.

Yes, cut the fat where there is fat. But to CONTINUE to cut the education budget in Georgia, while demanding better student achievement levels is foolhardy. (Side note: I surely hope that “God Bless the Teacher” is really NOT teaching any of our children! Someone with so little intelligence as to suggest that teachers pay for their own subs, shouldn’t be anywhere NEAR a teaching position!)

And for Deal to begin laying the groundwork for more Draconian cuts to education, while also laying the ground work for more TAX BREAKS for “businesses” to supposedly kick start the state’s economy and fill Georgia’s coffers is laughable.

The former budget guru for the “Republican Deity” Ronald Reagan, Dick Stockman, has let the cat out of the bag … TRICKLE DOWN ECON DOES NOT WORK! It’s fantasy! Giving tax breaks to businesses does not increase state revenues and does not result in more jobs!!

But sadly, Republicans have continued to push this lie for 30 years on a largely uneducated populace that they have targeted, and their tactic has worked. And we continue to see its impact on blogs like this one, and in elections that produce results like our governor’s race — where the winner QUIT his national political seat because he knew he was about to be investigated and most likely indicted.

But, I digress. Call for an extra penny to be added to all sales in Georgia, and make the legislation air-tight so that the money only goes to K-12 education. Also, include in the legislation that in five years, the extra penny tax can only be extended with voter approval.

Meanwhile, take away ALL tax breaks for any business based in Georgia that has more than 10 percent of its operations overseas.

Sorry, Wrong Answer

December 9th, 2010
2:04 pm

@teacher&mom…Your numbers are still way off. It doesn’t cost less to maintain facilities in a small school than in a big one – the football field and basketball courts are still the same size. Teachers paid extra as sports coaches are not “free” – that money is not coming from gate receipts and if you don’t have a booster club, it is coming straight out of county salary funds. Are all the materials and equipment (balls, uniforms, goals, trainers gear) donated? Do the referees donate their time? Is the bus drivers’ time and gas money donated or paid for by gate receipts? The health inspections are MANDATORY for any fixed location that sell food in Georgia (that is, your concession stand). How are all the nonrevenue sports funded? Swimming pools are not costless, nor does an outdoor track never require maintenance.

But still, your point is well taken. It is time to stop cutting instructional funds. I think the beef some of us have with your defense of sports programs is: a) they are nonessential for academic performance and b) if districts budgets are to continue shrinking, then nonessential activities should go first. Personally, I would rather take even $5,000 saved from a sports program and buy classroom technology, toner for the school’s printer, magazine subscriptions for the library, glassware for the chemistry lab, or dry-erase markers for the poor teacher who had to fund that out of his/her own pocket. Only in the US do schools have the fanatical devotion to sports teams from 6th grade up. If the programs are as cheap to run as you say and are self-supporting, then let the city or county government run them as traveling sports teams and get the schools out of the sports business.

Batgirl

December 9th, 2010
2:06 pm

Yes, I get those personal days, too. I am a public school media specialist, but if I take my days because I’m sick, the library shuts down because I have no parapro and that teacher who goes shopping will get a sub before I will. I just think everyone should be a little more considerate about when they take their days especially in this economic climate.

alm

December 9th, 2010
2:24 pm

“Eliminate senior exemptions on property taxes.”
Amen! Sooner the better!

“In DEKALB County we could get rid of our TV show on cable, the people who run it and over half the Central office.”
I think they should keep PDS24 but only show the current BOE meeting on a loop and cut everything else. I agree the Central Office is too big.

Booklover

December 9th, 2010
2:29 pm

@Batgirl and “God Bless” and anyone else with sick day issues–
Your personal and sick days are part of your compensation as an employee. These are some of the “perks” we are allotted for taking a public sector job that has less financial benefit than the private sector. (Note, however, that the vast major of private sector jobs, particularly those requiring the education that teachers hold, also allot sick and personal days!)

The money to cover those personal/sick days is (supposed to be) set aside to pay for subs for the personal and sick days that you take. This is why employees are supposed to be able to roll over sick days onto retirement.

Georgia puts many restraints on rolling over sick days, however, which encourages many employees to use them less judiciously than they may prefer. Teachers cannot receive cash pay-outs for unused sick days, cannot transfer them to other states, and cannot roll fewer than 20 days into retirement, so in districts like mine, where many military spouses leave the state when the Army moves hubby, teachers are forced to take sick days or lose that compensation.

We had one teacher who had over 15 sick days saved up after just a few years teaching here–clearly she didn’t call out sick a lot! When she found out hubby was getting transferred, she had to use those sick days or lose thousands of dollars in compensation! (Not to mention, moving a house is a lot of time and work…)

What's best for kids?

December 9th, 2010
3:16 pm

I saved up my sick days because I would need them one day. And I did. Teachers don’t get paid maternity leave. We get 8 weeks that comes out of our sick leave. So I took 16 weeks of sick leave, eight weeks for each of my kids. Thank goodness I saved for it.
Batgirl, you are not responsible for the library being closed when you are sick. The school should have a sub for you. The kids are being punished because the county is cutting days, and the powers that be know that you will come to school rather than punish the students.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
3:22 pm

@teacher&mom”

4 at the high school (based on numbers, we are paying for 2 PE teachers at the high school out of local funds).”

At one school that could mean a savings of over 250k annually. Multiply that by all the high schools and that is a lot of money. Again, if their have to be cuts for teachers this is where it should start.

Warrior Woman

December 9th, 2010
3:29 pm

@blackbird13, catlady, etc. – Before you start talking about cutting athletics and other extracurriculars, you should realize that many school districts provide little or no funding for athletics. For example, all athletics in Cobb County are essentially student funded. For the sport in which my students are involved, the county provides a whopping $2600 coaching supplement per year. The athletes and their parents pay for field preparation and maintenance (incuding replacing sod; mowing grass; painting the lines on the field; and maintaining the speaker system, concession stands, and scoreboards at the stadium, for example); purchasing and maintaining uniforms and equipment; travel to other schools for games; paying the referees; paying for substitute teachers if the coach misses a class for coaches’ training or games; and paying for insurance that protects the county and school if a player is injured at a game. The coaching supplement is a miniscule portion of the budget, and in return, the school gets fields that are also used for PE maintained by the teams. The school and county also get to count all the money the team and its boosters spend on the sport when reporting female athletic opportunities for Title IX purposes. And before you say, “Cut the coaches’ teaching positions,” you should realize that PE and health are required subjects and that many coaches teach hard academic subjects, including AP classes.

@HS Math Teacher – Most systems haven’t cut to the bone. Very few made central office cuts.

@Sorry, Wrong Answer – You’re leaving out the participation fees the student athlete pay, and grossly overestimating the expenses, considering they are shared among several teams. Remember, football, soccer, track and field, lacrosse, etc., all use the same stadium. All those teams plus basketball, volleyball, softball, baseball, etc., use the same weight room. And PE classes also use both.

Finally, there is abundant evidence that student involved in extracurricular activities, including student athletes, outperform other students in terms of grades, graduation rates, and college participation.

The cuts need to be made first at the bloated central offices and support staff that are not teaching positions – truckloads of assistant superintendents, program managers, financial managers, etc., along with high priced pet projects and inefficient programs. School systems are notoriously inefficient in spending our money. Second should be all ESOL expenses. Next in line should be excessive numbers of assistant principals/administrators, graduation coaches, student support services, etc. This would include medical care for special ed students, which is enormously expensive. Fourth would be things like arts and PE classes, with the last thing to be cut hard academics.

Other state agencies have endured budget cuts of as much as 45% over the past few years. These include some charged with public safety. Compared to that, the schools haven’t been touched. There is still enormous fat in school budgets, but it’s controlled by those making the decisions to cut teachers instead of cutting their turf.

Jokester

December 9th, 2010
3:32 pm

Slavery: Georgia continues to pay for the sins of its fathers. And it will continue to pay until this whole cesspool colapses completely.

HS Public Teacher

December 9th, 2010
3:40 pm

So many people have no clue how things work and yet have such rock-hard opinions….

I teach science. I am also a coach. My ‘extra’ pay from the County is all of $2000 per year – hardly enough to save anything or anyone.

Cutting sports does NOTHING real for the budget. You idiots that continue beating this drum need to STOP until you get the facts.

Sports brings more money in than it cost. Can you at least understand that?

The parents of the players contribute money. There are fund raisers. There is a boster club. There are ticket sales. There are concession sales. Corporations will sponsor.

Again, cutting sports will save NOTHING for the budget of the school of the school system.

Get over it.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
3:41 pm

“The cuts need to be made first at the bloated central offices and support staff that are not teaching positions – truckloads of assistant superintendents, program managers, financial managers, etc., along with high priced pet projects and inefficient programs.”

I absolutely agree with that, but I still favor cutting p.e and sports because they are a waste of time and money. Look at the rest of the world that ranks ahead of us in education and see how much time they devote to sports.

FCS Teacher

December 9th, 2010
3:45 pm

The real reason we should eliminate athletics from schools is the completely useless coaches that get hired as “teachers”. I’m sure every high school teacher who reads this blog has had an experience working with a special education team teacher who spends his entire day sitting in the back of the room sketching plays in his notebook — that is when he shows up to class. While eliminating athletics may help us with some budget concerns, it would help raise achievement by getting coaches out of and teachers into the classroom.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
3:49 pm

@hs Public teacher. Again, cutting sports will save NOTHING for the budget of the school of the school system”

False. Go find out how much the head football coach makes and then tell me cutting his salary wouldn’t save money. And just because you like sports it doesn’t mean they should have anything to do with school. And do concessions and fundraisers and boosters pay for million dollar athletic fields? Where does that money come from and regardless of where it comes from why should it go to anything other than education, not playtime?

Warrior Woman

December 9th, 2010
3:51 pm

@blackbird – The facts show that sports are emphatically NOT a waste of time and money. Sports participation improves attendance, grades, test scores, graduation rates, and college attendance. Look at Dwyer, Sallis, Blizzard, Lazarus, & Dean (2001); Dwyer et al. (1983); Linder (1999); Linder (2002); Shephard (1997); Tremblay et al. (2000); JacAngelo (2003); Din (2005); and others.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
3:52 pm

@HS public teacher

“Get over it.”

You need to get over the idea that sports are important enough to give you 200 dollars extra a year, much less 2000. Things change; get over that.

Warrior Woman

December 9th, 2010
3:54 pm

@blackbird – “Where does that money come from and regardless of where it comes from why should it go to anything other than education, not playtime?”

Because if the money doesn’t come from public coffers, you don’t get to dictate how private funds are spent. Just because you don’t like sports doesn’t mean they should be removed from schools when sports’ benefit on education is a fact.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
3:57 pm

@Warrior Woman

Sorry, but the days of giving students external motivation to do what they should do anyway are over. Don’t want to go to school because there is no football? Fine, get ready to be a bum. Look at how far this country is falling behind in education every year; the time for coddling is over.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
4:07 pm

@FCS teacher
“While eliminating athletics may help us with some budget concerns, it would help raise achievement by getting coaches out of and teachers into the classroom.”

Absolutely. And if you look into the numbers, you will find that head football coaches are often the highest paid “instructor” in the school. What a joke. I have, in my 20 years of experience have known two head coaches who were not p.e. teachers (glorified babysitters). People are so sold on this nonsensical idea that sports have to be a part of education that they will justify it anyway they can.

td

December 9th, 2010
4:16 pm

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
12:28 pm

I do not think you know what you are talking about. My son is on the wresting team and his coach is a math teacher and the varsity coach is a social studies teacher. I have paid $50 this year for transportation cost and my son is required to raise another $100 for his sport. I have also paid at least $5 for every match I have been to for myself and all my family. I thinks the coaches will receive a $2000 supplement for coaching the sport. I am pretty sure this sport is paying for itself. The football team had 6 home games this year and I know just the gate raised over $500,000 so I am pretty sure that program paid for itself. If you must talk about a problem then it is with title 9 and women’s sports not paying for themselves. I personally thing women should have sports but if you want a bottom line then there is something for you to rail about.

The PE department is the smallest in the school because the new core curriculum requirements (4 years Math, 4 years of English, 4 years of science, 3 years of social studies, 2 years of a foreign language. ect) do not let the students take very many PE classes. They are required to take a personal fitness class and a health class to graduate.

The real problem is the central office staff and the glut of administrators, counselors ect in the k-12 schools and some of the money we pay teachers who teach is elementary school. Their salaries are outrageous. The Superintendents, deputy superintendents ect in the central office that make more money that the Governor of the state ($150,000) or the Superintendent of the state ($139,000). I think some make more then the President of the United States. Why do we need Kindergarten, 1st, 2nd or 3rd grade teachers with a Phd making more than $90,000 per year? Does there knowledge base really need to be that extensive for this age group kids to teach the basics?

If you really want to rail at something how about this: Dr Micheal Adams (President of UGA) makes more than $600,000 per year from the state and more than $1 million when you add money from the foundations. Look up all the University presidents salaries and Department chairs in our colleges and tell me we cut not trim some fat there first.

oldtimer

December 9th, 2010
4:51 pm

Some points: In the high school where I worked the best geometry (not in GA) teacher is the football coach. He does a wonderful job and parents want him. He also gets the “bad boys” because he can “handle” them.
Music enhances everyone’s education. Small children actually learn through songs as do special education students.
Art is a way all children can express themselves. It also enhances social studies and science education.
Cutting 20-50% of of the central office budget would actually help. We might need coordinators, but they could live without a secretary. Cut one AP at high schools. Small schools could share AP personnel. The state could slim down documentation. We could cut some testing…at some grades.
We need to think outside the box. The state is out of money. The main job of the state is provide security for the public and educate the children. Neither of this is being done very well. Now me have to stop spending money.

teacher&mom

December 9th, 2010
5:19 pm

@blackbird-”At one school that could mean a savings of over 250k annually. Multiply that by all the high schools and that is a lot of money. Again, if their have to be cuts for teachers this is where it should start.”

That may be the case at your local school but is sure isn’t the case in my system. Trust me on this one. I took the time to look up the coaches salaries this afternoon. If you took the two highest paid teacher/coaches in our system, their combined salaries do not come anywhere close to 250K.

An American Patriot

December 9th, 2010
5:22 pm

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
12:28 pm
“Cutting sports overall really doesn’t save big money. The reason is that because for the most part, sports are self-sustaining…. they can generate enough revenue to pay for themselves.”

But if jobs have to go, the jobs related to them should be the first to go. Most coaches teach p.e., which, again, if cuts have to be made, should also be the first to go. In fact, those cuts should have been made already

@blackbird13 – It’s quite obvious you and “catlady” are not big high school sports fans. Do you know what motivates a lot of kids to attend high school?…..yep, athletics…..you take away this and the dropout rate in Georgia High Schools would be through the roof. You might not like it, but high school athletics do tons more good things than bad things……bad idea, boys and girls.

If you really, really want to balance the school budgets here in Georgia, there is a sure fire way to do it and I actually threw out this suggestion earlier this year (I got crucified for it, but that’s OK, I don’t mind)……Either do away with the school busing systems or charge parents for the actual costs…..presto, the budget is balanced overnight……any takers?????? :)

teacher&mom

December 9th, 2010
5:27 pm

As long as we squabble and fuss about sports vs. non-sports, Nathan Deal and his merry band of legislators can continue to rob education. While I understand the 2011 budget will be tight, what I don’t understand is the unwillingness to explore other options for raising revenues. I personally think Deal’s announcement was a litmus test to see how the general public feels about further cuts. If he doesn’t get any push-back from the public, then they will proceed as planned.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
5:59 pm

“Either do away with the school busing systems or charge parents for the actual costs…..presto, the budget is balanced overnight……any takers??????”

Numbers for that? School bus drivers make next to nothing. A lot of kids would simply not make it to school. I support cutting extracurricular bus use, but what you are suggesting makes no sense if the goal is for students to get to school. Plus, you would create an even worse traffic problem than we already have. How about charging everyone for parking, staff included? My wife and I have to pay for parking where we work, why not teachers and students? And I don’t mean some nominal amount. And if there have to be football games and such, charge for parking on that too. (I know some schools already do this)

catlady

December 9th, 2010
6:07 pm

say what? Actually, I have taught sped. Very special sped. My problem is that employing these folks (therapists), providing benefits, giving them cushy schedules, wastes money for the system. Let the therapies be done outside of school time, outside of schools’ purview. The providers can bill the government (they already fill out the paperwork to do so) The federal government can still pay; the systems won’t be hit for the extra costs of hiring them. ALL parents have to take care of the needs of their children. Many sped kids have additional assistance through CMS, SSI benefits, the Marcus Center. Just disengage the schools from the services. We have to think outside the box.

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
6:08 pm

“Do you know what motivates a lot of kids to attend high school?…..yep, athletics…..you take away this and the dropout rate in Georgia High Schools would be through the roof.”

Yeah, well if we continue to coddle kids in this way, looking to help them feel better about themselves when they should be going to school to learn and to survive in a tough world, we are going to have big problems anyway. I’m not sure that kids who are only in school for sports should be there anyway, as more than likely they are disruptive and a waste of instruction time. Let them go learn to work at whatever job they can get; a high school diploma isn’t going to make any difference.

catlady

December 9th, 2010
6:41 pm

say what?: And parents might more closely monitor the therapists to be sure their children are getting the services they should be getting. When the providers don’t show up, the parents would be more likely to notify the authorities.

“Patriot”: Actually, I AM big on high school sports. Among my 3 children, 12 consecutive years of band, sports, cheerleading–I don’t want to hear it! After they graduated, I have continued to attend. And I am QUITE aware that research links extracurricular participation with finishing high school. I am merely saying it is a luxury we cannot seem to afford right now.

Think of the percentage of students who participate in sports (let’s limit it to that right now) compared to the student body. Our school has about 1200 students. But less than 200 participate in sports (not counting other things, like band or ag or theater, which are actually classes). Is it worth the money, including building and maintaining the venues, salaries for coaches, cleaning, transportation, equipment, security, and uniforms?

On bus service: Have central pickup spots to minimize gas use. Parents who do not make arrangements for their kids to get to school can be taken to the woodshed by DFACS. You see, the accountability and responsibility are not just on the part of the schools.

GNGS

December 9th, 2010
6:57 pm

I realize that the question has foretold the answer. However, let us think outside of box for a second. Many districts have SPLOST, which is dedicated to capital investment (buildings etc.). If the governor-elected is willing to push for more flexibility on how SPLOST fund can be used, it can relieve some stress on school funding. Yes, It will not be easy and it will require a referendum.

mcc

December 9th, 2010
8:16 pm

I love all these wonderful teachers & parents suggesting that we just cut out all of the federally-mandated special education providers with “cushy” schedules (yeah, I don’t consider seeing 55 kids multiple times per week very “cushy”). Federal law doesn’t allow the school system to push the responsibility for these services onto parents outside of the school day because the services relate to deficits in EDUCATIONAL performance. Billing the governent directly is a joke – two years ago I was billing $120/hour for private speech therapy. Do you actually think the federal government gives my school system anywhere near that amount of $$ for my services in the schools?? Yeah, right. Local taxes cover the majority of my TEACHER salary.

Those of you who are so unhappy with expenses related to special education, I suggest you consider how you would feel if your student was bright but could not speak due to a physical disability. Or if your child had autism (NOT a guarantee of a limited IQ). Would these services seem so unimportant to you then??

I encourage you to contact your US Senators & US Representatives and urge them to end the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act so that you don’t have to deal with these children, nor do you have to be bothered by the presence of these “therapists” with such cushy jobs. After all, who cares what happens to these kids anyway?? Let’s just throw them all back into institutions, why don’t we?? **sarcasm**

just watching

December 9th, 2010
8:46 pm

I wonder how much of our taxpayer money that APS and other districts are wasting trying to “recover” per pupil funds from the very few state commissioned charter schools that exist? I am quite sure that the out going money will far exceed whatever funds they may “recover” if they win.

As for the discussion about the sports programs….drop it. Cutting sports from HS will never happen. It just won’t. And cutting PE? We have a SERIOUS public health problem in obesity and diabetes. We need kids that WANT to participate in physical activity and learn the skills to do so. You can pay for the PE now or you can pay for the increased healthcare costs later. It’s bad enough that PE is now relegated to only ONE day per week for most students. When I was in school we had PE at least 3 times a week (and 5 days at one of my schools). And don’t even get me started on what they’ve done with recess….15 minutes once a day and teachers can take it away as a punishment? Ugh.

say what?

December 9th, 2010
8:49 pm

@mcc- I am with you on special EDUCATION students’ needs. Even with the mandates, not enough is being done- no need to gamble with the hope that the parents will report poor providers when services are not provided according to teh IEP.

Someone mentioned adding DFACS to the fray when parents don’t behave accordingly. This blog is addressing the cuts to education, but DFACS is being cut left and right, and every staff member, except the executives at 2 Peachtree, must take at least 1 furlough day per month. And while on furlough understand that if any hurt harm or danger comes to a child on your case load, you will be terminated.

just watching

December 9th, 2010
9:00 pm

@catlady….have you seen the wait lists for the Marcus Center and other providers? Plus many school districts no longer employ their own therapists, but instead hire contracting companies to come in and do so. So they aren’t paying benefits out for those folks.

An American Patriot

December 9th, 2010
9:09 pm

You know, blackbird13 and catlady, we can argue about this forever, but cutting athletics out of high schools doesn’t save any money. Doesn’t the state pay local systems a per student amount? If you cut out athletics, you’re not gonna have as many students in school, thus lowering the amount the systems get. There is a threshhold you cannot go below in running a school system…..OK, you can cut some teachers if you cut athletics, but you still have those fixed costs that will be there regardless…..you can’t have it both ways. You have all these dropouts, you’re gonna have more crime…you’re gonna have more people on welfare, etc., etc……you’re just transferring the costs to another program. As far as cutting the school busing, I know that pretty radical, but somehow, someway, parents are gonna have to be accountable for the education of their kids…..they brought ‘em into this world, they have to take care of them……that’s not the governments job, although it seems like it sometimes. I’m 10-10 and on the side….bye.

Dekalbite

December 9th, 2010
9:24 pm

Enter your comments here

blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
9:33 pm

“If you cut out athletics, you’re not gonna have as many students in school, thus lowering the amount the systems get.”

That in itself is a sad commentary on American life and young people that goes beyond the issues of schools and budgets.

ScienceTeacher671

December 9th, 2010
9:34 pm

An American Patriot, we give them paper, pencils, books, breakfast, and lunch, because they can’t seem to afford those….

…although most of them do manage to have the latest cell phones.

ScienceTeacher671

December 9th, 2010
9:37 pm

If they are only coming to school to play football, how much effort are they actually putting into the academic side of it?

MS Man

December 9th, 2010
9:46 pm

I think everyone here and who reads this blog needs to attend budget hearings and BOE meetings to get the facts about their own county’s positions and problems. It is evident that Fulton, Cobb, Gwinnett, Dekalb, and APS have very different issues than all the other counties in the metro area and definitely different issues than rural counties that make up the other 150 school districts in Georgia. For metro counties, there are local property taxes that supplement salaries, benefits, and buildings. For the majority of counties in GA, the state salary is all you get and if the state can’t pay, you don’t get paid. I am all for cutting “non-essential” services, but I understand also that what is non-essential to you, is essential to someone else. I think it is also really important in all these blogs to understand that school funding comes from basically four sources and usually those four pots have specific uses that can’t be changed. You get money from federal programs, state funding, local funding, and any “private” funding sources (read donations, private grant foundations, booster clubs, etc.) If Deal wants to give flexibility, he needs to change how school systems are able to use federal dollars. Most of the waste in the bigger systems comes from mishandling of Title I dollars. Educate yourself on how funding actually works in schools, not just how you think it “should” or could or might work.

HS Public Teachers

December 9th, 2010
11:04 pm

@blackbird13,

Again, YOU need to educate yourself. Most head football coaches are teachers in academic subjects. I know of one that is a science teacher and one in another school that teaches Social Studies.

Head football coaches earn a salary as a teacher plus a stipend. The head football coaching stipend is less that $10,000 and is usually more like around $5,000. Again, cutting this stipend is a drop in the bucket.

And don’t forget that football is a major profit center for the school. Cut that stipend and lose around $15,000 PER FOOTBALL GAME in some cases!

The football field, the basketball court, and so on is standard issue for any high school built. If there are “extras” they must be paid for by the boosters or from the “profit” that the sport brings in. It is NEVER coming out of the school or school system budget.

Do I think that PE teachers should be cut? Well, there is value to physical education cases. Of course, they should be cut before the core academic areas. But most high schools have only 1 or 2 real PE teachers. Most coaches teach other subjects.

Again, EDUCATE YOURSELF. And,…..

Get over it!

An American Patriot

December 10th, 2010
8:26 am

@ScienceTeacher671

December 9th, 2010
9:37 pm
If they are only coming to school to play football, how much effort are they actually putting into the academic side of it?

That Sir/Madam? is an excellent question……to answer, I point you sixty-five miles east of Atlanta, toward that football factory known as UGA……need I say more? :)

@blackbird13

December 9th, 2010
9:33 pm
“If you cut out athletics, you’re not gonna have as many students in school, thus lowering the amount the systems get.”

That in itself is a sad commentary on American life and young people that goes beyond the issues of schools and budgets.

Excellent, excellent point……the whole problem in our school systems is not the students or teachers…..it’s the PARENTS of the students. From an early age, some kids are taught that athletics is the most important thing, not academics and an inordinate amount of time and effort on the part of the parents and students are spent on athletics. The one thing that really disturbs me a lot is seeing a kid walking down the street bouncing a basketball. Only a very small percentage of high school athletes receive full athletic scholarships to attend colleges/universities……and a lesser percentage of those receiving scholarships go on to make it in pro sports…..the odds against it are tremendous. There are a lot of success stories about athletes not playing pro sports and I do not mean to diminish these achievements…….they, not athletes keep this country alive and well.

The chances of cutting athletics out at our high school in Georgia…….slim and none…..no way it’s gonna happen, not in my lifetime

East Cobb Parent

December 10th, 2010
8:58 am

Catlady I support your thinking on the special services. Cobb County has a school that services hearing impaired. Last year they had 3 students, this year 4. One teacher and two aides, teacher makes over 90K. The students receive door to door service via the bus. One child has been in the program since 3. A few miles down the road another school with the same program. These programs should be combined. Then you would have one class, one teacher, two support staff and 7 students. Still pretty good odds.
No one is saying we shouldn’t address special needs, but it is time to look at these specialized services and combine where we can. Times are tough.
As for sports, music, art, I say cut them. Doesn’t mean I don’t think they are valuable, but we need to focus on the basics. Charge parents more or let the foundations cover the music and art programs.

Lisa B.

December 10th, 2010
9:20 am

A number of years ago, the Portland, Oregon school system was broke. School ended 26-days early that year. The next year, school athletics became pay-to-play activities. Parents had to buy uniforms, equipment, and contribute to all other related overhead. I don’t know how many years that went on in Portland, but I do remember feeling sad for the “poor” students who lost the opportunity to compete in sports. I am not saying I agree or disagree with what happened in Portland, but believe that to preserve academics in Georgia, we need to consider all sorts of options.

East Cobb Parent

December 10th, 2010
1:21 pm

@ WWoman – Cobb county has installed astro turf in most HS. Should complete soon for all HS. I can assure you that Walton HS is severely limiting the use of the field to protect the turf. There are many areas where education spending could be cut, I agree that we should start with the bloated central offices found in Cobb, DeKalb, APS, Gwinnett etc. When you see the mostly empty HS and MS buses, you realize there could be a cost savings there. I’ve always found it ironic that parents drive the one or two blocks to the bus stop for ES when the school is about a mile from our sub. No one is going to enjoy cutting the budget but it must be done. Remember those pennies add up to dollars.

Poetry Man

December 10th, 2010
1:37 pm

Those of you who want to cut sports, PE, etc. are ignorant. I teach high school literature and am not an athlete by any stretch of the imagination, but I know darn well that without athletics, many students would drop out. Football, basketball, track, etc. are the only reasons many of these kids come to, and stay in, school. They keep their grades up in order to play ball. Sure, some of the coaches are lunk-heads, but many times they are the only ones who can reach those kids. I don’t like the cuts any more than any of you, but cutting athletics is just as assinine as cutting music and art. To educate is to create well-rounded individuals. A well-rounded individual is one who has book-knowledge as well as athletic and/or artistic abilities. Open your eyes people. Next time, get rid of the ones causing the problem (Republicans) and replace them with someone different (notice I didn’t say better!).

Fled

December 10th, 2010
11:51 pm

Well stated poetry man. Indeed, some of the coaches do an excellent job with students no one else can reach. Instead of fighting over crumbs, which is what republicans want, teachers should take a dose of “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take it anymore.” Republicans suck: it really is just that simple.

What's best for kids?

December 12th, 2010
7:14 am

mcc, I teach 160 kids multiple times a week~every day in fact. Many of them have IEPs. Many have other processing difficulties. I would LOVE to only have 50 kids that I see multiple times a week. Then I might have a chance of reaching them all.

GA priorities

December 12th, 2010
11:03 am

It’s funny to see 300-500 comment posts on entertainment blogs like “idol”, etc… but fewer on education issues. I don’t think the general public is interested with state school issues.

sports

December 12th, 2010
11:05 am

I am more on the side of academics (not a sports fan really) but I have to agree with poetry. Just because I do not like/value sports does not mean that my students do not live for them. I just wish that the focus was somewhat more on their schooling.

sports

December 12th, 2010
11:08 am

Also I like Lisa b.’s idea about the budget cuts in Portland.

Teacher

December 12th, 2010
11:41 pm

I’m reading this, and all I can do is shake my head.

I thought like a lot of these posters, until I moved from a wealthy suburban district to a poor rural district this year.

The school is all some of these kids have. This is where they get their 2 meals a day, where they learn, where people actually care about them.

Cut bus service? I can guarantee you a good chunk of children won’t show up. I know this because I hold an after school tutoring session 2x a week, and most of my students can’t attend due to lack of transportation.

Cut sports? I can assure you a good portion of our kids would fall through the cracks, because that’s all they have to keep them out of trouble. Also, the coaches at MY school? Over half teach core subjects. Another thing: each teacher/administrator in our school helps out at sporting events. I took tickets at a softball game and I ran the concession stand. Our principal took tickets at 4 events. The Assistant Principal worked the concession stand at 4 events-he even handled the pizza runs.

We save money in our district through our energy conservation program-some highlights: unplugging everything over long breaks, and setting our thermostats on 55 degrees when we leave the building in the late fall/winter and ~82 degrees when we leave in the spring/summer/early fall. The facilities manager comes by and checks every now and then to make sure it’s done. Saved the county over a million dollars thus far.

I plan on emailing Gov-elect Deal and letting him know he needs to think of other options, or mandate that the school districts cut at the central office level. I don’t know how much more we can cut.

South GA

December 13th, 2010
3:59 am

Concerned about SPED parents? The only ones who whine about services are the ones unwilling to take care of their own children. I am a Mom of a such a kid- and a teacher’s wife. If you get Medicaid- your kid can go to numerous therapies on the Govt dime every day if you wish-out of school. If you don’t like what they provide- work and get a job with better benefits. SHBP has rules, limits, OOP & Co-pays. School is not the place for therapy- unless the federal Govt pays for it. They mandate- they pay- that simple. GA should pay the counties for QBE’s- or they cannot penalize non-compliance and should be sued. It’s called suck it up- like the rest of us. Explain to your kid that you were not willing to work your tail off to pay for what they need- and you expect them to work their tail off to succeed. EBD is not a true DX- nor is SEBD. The child’s behavior is the parent’s problem- period. Medical needs are medical- not educational. Kids’ need to know being a deadbeat, freeloading POS does not entitle you to handouts from every charitable person, gov’t entity or neighbor. It means that you can be thrown out of school for being a thug. It means that they cannot have everything they want- and will find out education, brutal determination and hard work offer the way out of being a “have not”.

Warrior Woman

December 14th, 2010
1:59 pm

@Lisa B – Georgia is a “pay-to-play” state already.