Kathy Cox heads to DC. She can go with her head held high.

I like Kathy “With a K” Cox.  I don’t know her well; she is not the type to call and chat. Neither am I. And most of our conversations over the years came in response to bad news on Georgia’s education front. With each new round of scores or studies, I would make the call to the Department of Education and ask for a comment.

“What does Kathy think about the stagnant SAT scores?” “Why aren’t our NAEP scores in reading improving?”  “Why isn’t Kathy challenging the cuts to education by the Legislature?”

On her last day as school superintendent, I want to talk about why I like Cox.

I like her because she met my three criteria for a decent elected official.  She was honest. I never feared that she would scrape the gold off the Gold Dome to pay for plastic surgery. I couldn’t say that about her predecessor and current state prison inmate Linda Schrenko, who would have rented a crane, strapped on a harness and started chiseling if it weren’t easier for her just to steal the money directly from the education budget to underwrite a facelift.

Secondly, Cox ran for school superintendent in 2002 because she wanted to do that job. She did not run to sell more insurance back in Peachtree City or because her granddaddy once held the seat or because it was a good stepping stone to the governor’s mansion. She genuinely believed she could improve education in Georgia.

And she has. While it’s still unclear what our exact graduation rate is because of how we count, there is no doubt that it rose during her tenure. Has she improved education to the point that we can all sit back, kick off our shoes and proclaim, “Well done. Pour the champagne”? (BTW, I would appreciate any English teacher telling me if I have the right punctuation on this sentence.)

No. But I think Cox took a moribund DOE, brought it back to life, set it on the right path and led Georgia into the age of tougher standards, greater accountability and higher expectations. I don’t think everyone was ready to go down the path, including superintendents, principals and teachers used to closing the door and running their own universes.

I continue to be impressed with Cox’s hires at the DOE, talking to Martha Reichrath and Elizabeth Webb today at Cox’s goodbye gathering. These are smart women. They are not unaware of the problems. They are not ignoring the complaints about math or the concerns about vo-tech. They know there is too much testing. They have been in the classroom. They are not sealed off from the real world and the real challenges.

The farewell event today opened with a performance by student musicians from the Georgia Pick and Bow Traditional Music Program. Their first selection was “I’ll Fly Away,” which I thought was the perfect song for someone about to leave Georgia to head a think tank in Washington. Cox had her whole family there, including her husband, two sons, her mother, her sister, her niece and a slew of in-laws.

There was a funny slide show, including a great cartoon that spoofed both Cox’s many hairstyles over the years and her unfortunate comment in 2004 that the word “evolution” was a politically charged buzzword and thus wasn’t going to be part of the Georgia science curriculum, a decision that she came to regret and that she wisely undid.

But what I liked about the event was how much of it was spent talking about education. To her last seconds on the job, Cox talked about the performance standards, about efforts to get more kids to graduate, about the thousands of schools she visited, about her pride in improving conditions at the state schools for students who are deaf and blind.

And that is the third reason I like her: She is passionate about what she does.

At times, I wish Cox had showed more of that passion with her fellow GOP leaders, such as when Gov. Sonny Perdue responded to the gas crisis in 2005 by shutting down schools and idling school buses. That delivered the exact wrong message about the value of education and Cox should have called him on it publicly.

Cox was more progressive than her party on education or at least than the leadership, and I think that was beginning to wear on her. This year, she was a bit more outspoken about what the proposed cuts would do to schools.

She leaves DOE to become CEO of the U.S. Education Delivery Institute, which will advise states on reform strategies. I assume that she will not have any political muzzles in her new job, and I will be anxious to hear her views on education in Georgia in the next few months. The two Republicans seeking her post want to reduce the federal role in Georgia, and even the federal monies, which pay for special education and for extra help in Georgia’s low-income schools. I have to imagine that Cox might have a few words to say about that.

I think we all should look forward to hearing from her. I wish her and her family well. She worked hard for Georgia schools. She was honest and she was passionate.

And she was smarter than a fifth grader, which isn’t all that easy having two of them myself.

68 comments Add your comment

EnoughAlready

July 1st, 2010
8:10 am

Actually she was a JOKE and didn’t do anything for the students in Georgia. I say she is running with her tail between her legs; as well she should.

Dunwoody Mom

July 1st, 2010
8:19 am

Good luck to Kathy Cox. I may not have agreed with her on many issues, but I do believe her heart was in the right place. IMO, the jury is still out on the Math issue. You cannot judge any type of changes for 5 or so years down the road. The problem with the Math changes as I see it is the lack of training and preparedness given to the teachers – that was poorly handled.

d

July 1st, 2010
8:28 am

My opinion of Kathy Cox changed a lot when I met her on Sine Die day this year. I spoke with her about some of the issues, and although I would have liked to have seen her fight this more throughout her term, her hands were tied a lot by a budget that the General Assembly and Governor gave her. She truly seemed to care and did answer my questions very intelligently. I wish her luck in DC.

Maureen Downey

July 1st, 2010
8:59 am

@Franklin and @Cobb Parent, I think there is an argument for appointing the school superintendent, but it would still be a political appointment. The politics inherent in the job present a problem whether we elect or appoint our school chief.
I am not sure how we get around that, but I agree that Kathy Cox was not that good at the politics of the job, the “back room” dealings.
However, the problem isn’t with Cox in the scenario. It’s that our education issues have to be subjected to back room dealings.
Maureen

An advocate for public education change & choice

July 1st, 2010
10:36 am

In my humble opinion, there is such a thing as a person being sincerely misguided. This is how I would describe the outgoing State Superintendant, Ms. Cox.

The random metrics sited as evidence of the success of tenure could easily be argued to the contrary. Personally, I think Ms.Cox’s lukewarm performance shines abit brighter when placed againest her predecessor, which gives a false impression of the value add she truely leaves as a legacy. Personally I think there are more questions than answers left in her wake.

schoolmarm

July 1st, 2010
11:51 am

I would have had more respect for Ms. Cox had she been more vocal in advocating more for teachers rather than being Perdue’s puppet. She was also non-supportive of National Board Certified teachers and agreed with Perdue’s drivel on the subject.

Formerly of the DOE

July 1st, 2010
12:49 pm

From one who has been there, please know that the Policital-public-Kathy is not the same Kathy who was seen behind the closed doors of the DOE conference rooms. The smiling cheerleader existed for those outside the Twin Towers. Inside, she was often a table-pounding, profanity-yelling, arrogant, tyrant. Many decisions were based on her personal preference rather than what was best for students and teachers.

Her Ga. certificate would not qualify her to even be an assistant principal in a school; and yet, we allowed her to be the superintendent of all schools. A good leadership class or two would have been most helpful!

yep

July 1st, 2010
12:54 pm

“The smiling cheerleader existed for those outside the Twin Towers. Inside, she was often a table-pounding, profanity-yelling, arrogant, tyrant. Many decisions were based on her personal preference rather than what was best for students and teachers.”

We’ve heard this before; of course try getting someone to look into it.

Baker

July 1st, 2010
2:04 pm

Didn’t she also kind of screw over her replacement/ Brad Bryant in the timing of her leaving? I guess there was just nothing that could be done based on when she got the job in D.C. It’s too bad Brad Bryant is having to scramble bc of bad Georgia ballot access rules.

New Blood Needed

July 1st, 2010
3:15 pm

Educator2

July 1st, 2010
5:16 pm

@Northview (Ex)Teacher- I too am astounded at Maureen’s comments. The Georgia Performance standards are simply rewritten QCC’s, Georgia does not compare itself nationally so there is no true value to any improvement in Georgia’s educational achievements and the decreasing cut scores raises the CRCT pass rate (DUH). She was silent while education was slaughtered during her tenure. She approved 7 furlough days when the governor initially was seeking 3 furlough days. Her re-election bid was the only reason she finally mentioned the budget cuts to education. The math 123 is a cruel joke on my children and the students in the state of Georgia. Kathy Cox’s’ only accomplishment is that is not Linda Schrenko and for that she should be commended? Amazing! This article is very disconcerting to say the least.

bootney farnsworth

July 1st, 2010
8:39 pm

good God.

no wonder we’re in so much trouble

Ole Guy

July 6th, 2010
12:23 pm

I guess results no longer count. Good thoughts and an honest face are all, apparently, that are required in order to gain accolades from the media. Then again, isn’t that pretty much what American politics have become? Given one inept moron with a Hollywood smile and that’s the ballgame. MY MY…how easily the media can be duped!

Well, at least no psuedo-affiliations with the Almighty have spewn forth.

Katie

July 6th, 2010
5:01 pm

Maureen, I must disagree with you, which makes me sad because I usually say “amen” to your comments.

Kathy is a traitor. She proved that when she stood by and allowed Perdue to throw NBCT’s, the state’s most accomplished teachers, under the bus. She publicly said that there are no studies that show that the students of NBCT’s achieve at higher rates, conveniently ignoring the dozens of studies to the contrary. She was Perdue’s lapdog, and I can’t express how glad I am that she is gone.

I only hope that someday we will have someone who “gets” public education and is willing to fight for what’s right for kids–and that means fighting for what’s right for teachers.

God help us.

South Ga Teacher180

July 6th, 2010
5:06 pm

Amen ScienceTeacher671….you hit the nail on the head.. students only have to pass 50% of the curriculum to be deemed as passing…what a crock of S ___ T!! Cox will now be at the bidding of elites in D.C to write their education policy for the next 30 years…she is not walking out with her head high, she is walking out with her head between her legs because she knew she would not get re-elected.

Maureen Downey

July 6th, 2010
5:06 pm

@Katie, I have run into a lot of opposing opinions, and I do agree that Kathy should have challenged the governor on more issues.
I do applaud the fact that she was also clear with her staff that decisions ought to be made with students in mind first, and I think that is a tremendous improvement over Linda Schrenko.
Maureen

Ole Guy

July 7th, 2010
4:47 pm

Maureen, I certainly do not mean to pin you into a corner, however, comparing Ms Cox’s leadership to that of Ms Schrenko, and proclaiming the former to be a tremendous improvement over the later is pretty much like comparing death by one means to be superior to death by another means simply because the end result, by one means is, comparitively, quicker and painless.

Public education, over both tenures, has seen nothing but a slow painful death; the “patient”, the Georgia Public Ed Systems, has been kept artificially alive by vast sums of public monies, and manipulation of academic performance to reflect resounding success.

Good thoughts notwithstanding, success’s only measurement is RESULTS. HOPE scholars who must take remedials, continuing drop-out rates, and more recently, the career-rattling nonesense with which the Georgia Teacher Corps has had to contend…all point to one inescapable, undeniable fact…LEADERSHIP FAILURE AT THE TOP.

To even suggest otherwise does not speak well for your employer, nor for you.

HS Math Teacher

July 9th, 2010
12:46 am

Hey, “Educator for Life”, I wouldn’t go around calling myself a “mathematician” either if I were you, unless you have a PhD in Mathematics (not Math Ed). It’s mighty arrogant, or short–sighted of you to assume that most, or all, of the math teachers who don’t like this radical change in math education have inferior mathematical knowledge.

The notion that ALL kids should have to take Math 1 through 4 is just damned foolish. Such a decision to eliminate a lower track (Core Math) is about what you would expect from an detached, egg headed bureaucrat who has never taught at a poor inner-city, or rural school.

The proof will be in the pudding. Let’s look at the actual pass rates for the subject courses, as well as the EOCT, for the next couple of years (statewide). I bet the situation will get to a critical point where the State will allow Math 2 to suffice for the newly created “lower track”, or some other modification will be made to accommodate lower achieving students.

Oh, and I haven’t been an Educator for Life. I’ve worked in private industry for ten years before teaching a little over 20 years.