Need-based HOPE legislation flies through Senate

The state Senate overwhelmingly passed Senate Bill 496, which adds a need-based component to the HOPE Scholarship. The bill was approved in a 45 to 4 vote.

The bill now moves to the House for consideration. I have to admit passage surprised me as the concept seems to have little public support. I also thought the Senate would figure there were too many major issues this year to tackle something as controversial as awarding HOPE Scholarships, albeit smaller ones of $600 or $700, based on need rather than academic achievement. Even UGA President Michael Adams said that he didn’t endorse the idea because he felt it would reduce overall support for the HOPE program.

Here is the release from  the Georgia state Senate:

SB 496, The HOPE College Opportunity Grant, passed the Senate today with an overwhelming majority. Sen. Jack Hill (R-Reidsville), the bill’s author, went to bat for need based students throughout Georgia by proposing the grant which will be based solely on need.

“This is a ‘stay in college grant’ that probably only amounts to a few hundred dollars, but will certainly help the neediest students in Georgia. These grants will aid students who require our help most as the economy continues to falter and tuition begins to rise,” said Hill. “By giving these students a needed hand, we are cementing a brighter future of our state’s education system and economy; what we put in today is indeed an investment in the future of our state.”

“During this economic downturn, we want to proactively look for ways to support our college students who struggle the most to afford their tuition. Education provides the foundation that is necessary to develop and maintain a 21st century workforce in Georgia. And we are committed to growing and expanding our workforce in Georgia so that we will lead in job growth and workforce readiness. Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Jack Hill has led on this issue and I want to thank him for his hard work and efforts to provide assistance to our neediest college students,” said Lt. Governor Casey Cagle.

In order to be eligible for the HOPE College Opportunity Grant, students must also be eligible for a Pell Grant during any term they apply for the grant. They must be full-time students attending eligible public postsecondary institution and meet enrollment standards including maintaining satisfactory academic progress.

The bill also notes certain residency requirements for grant applicants. The student must be classified as legal Georgia residents under the institution’s in-state tuition policy. Any student who is a Georgia resident at the time of their high school graduation must have met the residency requirements for at least 12 months prior to the first day of classes for which the HOPE grant is awarded. For any non-Georgia resident, this term is extended to 24 months. Additionally, dependent children of military personnel stationed in Georgia, who graduate from a Georgia high school or home study program, will be deemed Georgia residents.

The HOPE College Opportunity Grant is available until the student has earned a baccalaureate degree or until the student has attempted 190 quarter hours or 127 semester hours. The grant may be applied to any portion of the student’s cost of attendance.

Hill noted that 30 million in lottery funds are available to be set aside for this beneficial scholarship fund. Funding for the grant is based on appropriations, as well as how a specifics student’s need might change over their higher education career.

107 comments Add your comment

Hadass

March 29th, 2010
11:14 am

If a student is admitted into a college or university, it should be assumed that they have what it takes to succeed at that school. Therefore, the HOPE grant is NOT wasted on them. There are many reasons for low performance in high school; if a low performing student pursues higher education, they should be encouraged to succeed, not punished and put under more strain to afford their tuition. Additionally, this isn’t specifically for 4 year colleges and universities. These students may be more likely to try and prove themselves at junior college/ 2-year colleges and technical colleges or trades schools. I know a lot of people who made crap grades in high school, but were able to get through tech school and pursue a career that way. Taking away opportunities for higher education hurts everyone in the long run.

Huh?

March 29th, 2010
11:37 am

I read the article Maureen posted, and then I read the comments (that’s how it’s supposed to work, right?). It’s apparent that 95% of the people responding about handouts and changes to HOPE did not read this article at all. This grant is an extention of HOPE. The merit program is still in place and unchanged. That extra $600 might pay that low income kid’s fees and nothing else, as a previous poster demonstrated for us.

Leave it to the entitled to blow this thing out of proportion, though.

Ms. Omni- Kudos to you. You hit the nail on the head with your assertion that maybe some of these middle-upper class kids should have taken your route to college. and congrats on your upcoming nuptuals!

Sick in the City

March 29th, 2010
12:11 pm

@ Huh- Can’t speak for everyone, but I was commenting on other comments made and not the original post. And Cheryl- wow. Not only do you miss most of my points, but you twist my words and (worst of all) JUDGE me based on what you think I said. For such a good Christian, you’ve quickly forgotten to “judge not, lest ye be judged”

Hypocrites Among Us

March 29th, 2010
8:19 pm

@ Cheryl, thank you for comments to Sick in the City

@ Sick in the City, no need to “twist” your words. You did a wonderful job all by yourself! You showed a consistent “hateful” tone toward the poor. You showed your hypocritical side especially with the comment of “judge not, lest ye be judged” because you made many judgment statements yourself regarding the poor. The effort you put forth to put yourself above others actually puts you beneath those you criticize.

Sick in the City

March 29th, 2010
9:47 pm

I give up. You people are hopeless.

Mark

March 30th, 2010
12:06 pm

Geez…from elitist to leeches; from socialist to anarchist–the focus of this “discussion” seems to have jumped track long ago. The simple fact which needs to be examined is financial responsiblity. Are our legislators being good stewards of the people’s money? HOPE operates in the black. That’s a good thing. By adding this new financial incentive, will the program remain in the black or slip into the red? If red is the answer, by no means should the program be considered. If black is the answer, the program should be considered. All we should want as citizens of the state is for our government officials to be fiscally responsiblie. Placing our state further into debt, no matter how noble the endeavor, is not acceptable.

AKD Ladii Kweenz

June 2nd, 2010
6:48 pm

I feel that there should in fact be a need-based assistance program of some sort. Whether it would be HOPE or a newly founded program. Like a few stated before, tuition is increasing. Tuition is increasing but the assistance programs are at a fix rate, meaning students who can not afford schooling will have to take it out on loans. And because of the economic conditions that we are currently in, we not only have to worry about tuiton going up but also other expenses. Such as: mandatory fees, meal plans, textbooks, couse supplements, housing, and the list continues.
Also, there is that small percentage of individuals who may have lost financial aid because of some sort of hardship; this could include family illness or death. So, just because a student may not have that 3.0 or 4.0 GPA, doesn’t mean they EARNED that GPA. That person with a 1.8 could actually be smarted than the person with a 4.0. Everyone goes through issues and sometimes people don’t have something to fall back on. For instance my freshman year was going excellent, up until second semester. I didn’t go to parties and I stayed indoors most of the time. But my problem was I had became ill, and the school had told me I would have to stay out until I became better. My mother was also ill at the time (on disability) and my dad was in NY (doesn’t financially support and was ill). So in the end I ended up stressed about family, and also had fell back on school work. Once transcripts came back I had dropped my 3.0, and had lost all fin aid until further notice. (Meanwhile I was currently signed up for Summer Semester.) So just because you see that child with that 1.8 or 2.4, doesn’t mean they didn’t try to apply themselves. So why shouldn’t they be allowed a scond chance? Why shouldn’t they receive the help that they need? Anyone who deprives a child of an education, should be locked up.