1:03 pm March 5, 2010, by Maureen Downey
This is not the best way to start a weekend if you are a DeKalb County teacher:
From the AJC today:
DeKalb County teachers could see their pay decrease as much as 6.25 percent next school year.
The school board voted unanimously Friday morning to issue about 8,000 contracts to teachers, principals and other certified staff for next school year with the option of a pay reduction or furlough days. The pay cut is capped at 6.25 percent.
Your source to discuss and learn about education in Atlanta, Georgia and the nation
About Maureen DowneyVacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2011 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
57 comments Add your comment
Rob
March 5th, 2010
1:13 pm
DeKalb is the next Clayton County, it’s only a matter of time at this point.
Joy in Teaching
March 5th, 2010
1:15 pm
Pay reduction OR furlough days? If they have a choice, they should take the furlough days like the rest of us have had to take INSTEAD OF just letting them take the money out of their pay check and work those days for free.
General Sherman
March 5th, 2010
1:40 pm
My only question is Lewis,his replacement and the board going to do the same? My answer is no but,hell no! They do not practice what they teach.
catlady
March 5th, 2010
1:40 pm
I believe the original article also said contracts are due out by April 15, but I understood the state had moved the date to May 15?
General Sherman
March 5th, 2010
1:43 pm
Rob…My friend just look at Dekalb,Fulton,Clayton and the city of Atlanta.They are the same already!You get what you voted for.
Dunwoody Mom
March 5th, 2010
1:44 pm
Consider yourself lucky. From what I heard last weekend, Fulton County teachers have no idea when they will receive their contracts – same with Gwinnett.
RJ
March 5th, 2010
1:45 pm
Dekalb is having some tough decisions to make, but apparently their hands are tied. As a taxpayer or parent, I would be concerned how this will impact student achievement. Larger class sizes are inevitable.
@ General
March 5th, 2010
1:49 pm
Negative comments without details are empty comments. Please stop “generalizing!”
There are excellent schools with outstanding teachers and administrators everywhere,…
What are you doing to help a school in need?
General Sherman
March 5th, 2010
1:53 pm
The toughest decision they will have to make,same as the STATE of
Georgia is which PORK do we leave in and get away with it.Sonny wants to build a horse barn,a football hall of fame,money to the little league in his home county and a school at UGA that can wait.
General Sherman
March 5th, 2010
2:01 pm
@ General..please tell me you have the answers,nothing was said about teachers.The admin, does not follow suit when it comes to pay raises/Lewis for an example!
John Marshall
March 5th, 2010
2:03 pm
How do you motivate teachers to meet the state mandated testing requirements in the classroom? Educating our kids should be a priority. Money is wasted daily at our State House with our State Representatives & Governor. Honestly, what have they done for us lately?
Leonard Schreiber
March 5th, 2010
2:33 pm
There is no way I know of, that this “offer” can be constituted as a contract. A contract has to have exact terms and both paries are bound by them. Oh yeah, I forgot, Dekalb County School System did not live by their word (contract) last year. Why should they be expected to live by contract law now?
Dekalbite
March 5th, 2010
2:42 pm
Parents and teachers, please look at this. No wonder we can’t get teachers.
Position: Mechanic, Air Conditioner/Heat (HVAC)
Educational requirement: High school diploma or GED
Experience: 3 years
Salary: $43,111 to $58,665
Position: Teacher, Science, Language Arts, or Social Studies
Educational requirement: College degree
Experience: 3 years
Salary: $ 42,288 (salary for a teacher with 3 years of experience)
$ 58,248 (salary for a teacher with 20 years of experience)
$ 59,376 (salary for a teacher with 30 years of experience)
Below is the job description on PATS for HVAC personnel (DCSS currently has 5 openings):
“The Mechanical Maintenance Department is seeking a qualified HVAC Mechanic. The minimum requirements include a High School Diploma or GED equivalent. A minimum of three (3) years experience in HVAC installation and control systems is required. Two (2) years experience in industrial or commercial HVAC is preferred.
Position: Mechanic, Air Conditioner/Heat
Salary: $43,111.20 to $58,665.60”
Chime in teachers and tell us the service you get from HVAC. Their position requires a high school diploma and 3 years experience. Most of you will never make the salary they make.
The BOE wants to cut teacher salaries and teacher positions. Now you know why outsourcing is a great idea. If this doesn’t make you want to write your BOE members, I don’t know what will.
Dekalbite
March 5th, 2010
2:59 pm
Wait. There’s more.
Position: Mechanic, Kitchen Equipment
Educational requirement: High school diploma or GED
Experience: A valid Freon certificate and 5 years experience (preferred)
Salary: $43,111 to $58,665
Position: Teacher, Science, Language Arts, or Social Studies
Educational requirement: College degree
Experience: 3 years
Salary: $ 42,288 (salary for a teacher with 3 years of experience)
$ 58,248 (salary for a teacher with 20 years of experience)
$ 59,376 (salary for a teacher with 30 years of experience)
Below is the job description on PATS for a Kitchen Equipment Mechanic:
“Plant Services is seeking a Kitchen Equipment Mechanic to work in our Mechanical Maintenance Division.
The minimum qualifications include: A valid Freon certificate is required with a valid warm air certificate being preferred. Five (5) years experience as a commercial kitchen equipment mechanic is preferred. The applicant must have the ability to repair and maintain commercial hot and cold line equipment in the school kitchens-ovens-dishwashers-ice makers-walk in freezers……. The applicant must pass a Kitchen Equipment assessment test.
Position: Mechanic, Kitchen Equipment
Salary: $43,111 to $58,665”
The mighty ODE
March 5th, 2010
3:10 pm
Hey mighty ODE, Organization of DeKalb Educators, you going to tell teachers to wear black again? Not quite like taking a real stand, which would have been calling for cuts in administrative bloat. But I guess it’s hard to do that, when many of your dues paying members are part of the administrative bloat.
Dekalb teachers who are also ODE members, if you joined an organization that seemingly placed a higher priority on protecting cuts in administrative bloat than they did cuts in teacher pay, the question might not be why is this happening to me; the question might be why am I choosing to be an active co-creator in my own misery?
say what?
March 5th, 2010
3:52 pm
Dekalbite all you have shown me is that a four year college degree is not for everyone and that the state should put more investment in technical education programs. From you I understand that no one or any group should make more than a classroom teacher, though we know that technical positions are paid more even in the business world.
Teachers have the same option as the rest of us to find a career that is satisfying, and when they find that career understand the career limitations. If you find the limitations and continue on the path, then you have made a CHOICE that no one is responsible for but you.
The budget is a mess in all school systems not just DeKalb. It should be fair to note that pay cuts and furloughs have NOT been voted on, but in addition to the first 4 budget choices, there are now an additional 5 or 6 that taxpayers and parents should now review.
AJC got your blood pressure up just in time for you to miss a wonderful weekend.
Stop getting your news from second hand sources, and become involved in the budget process.
@ say what?
March 5th, 2010
4:08 pm
I must have touched a nerve. You must be a Service Center employee?
Your idea that teachers and students i.e. the classroom are somehow expendable is pretty typical of many of the 6,500 employees that are not teachers. If it weren’t for those pesky teachers and students, everything would be fine.
We cannot have a quality educational system with only half of our employees as teachers. I’ve already written every BOE member asking them to cut, consolidate, and outsource as much as possible in the admin and support area before considering touching the classroom (teachers and students).
Please write your BOE member parents/taxpayers and express your opinion. Here is a link to the DeKalb website BOE page. Click on each member’s name and write them an email.
http://www.dekalb.k12.ga.us/board/members/
If you want to write one email that reaches every BOE, go to the DeKalb School Watch blog (see link below). Above the Comments section on the right hand side of the webpage you will see an email link named CLICK HERE to Email the entire DCSS board of Education.
http://www.dekalb.k12.ga.us/board/members/
Dunwoody Mom
March 5th, 2010
4:24 pm
Here is a link to some good information:
http://www.dekalb.k12.ga.us/superintendent/files/436C2010F395435BAC77EA4FCB824809.pdf
Nikole Allen
March 5th, 2010
4:25 pm
Dekalb teachers are the only metro Atlanta teachers to have not had step increases in years, and now we are to take a cut? What about the 982 administrative positions? This is a SCHOOL system. Jobs that do not directly impact students should take the cuts. America’s Choice should be cut.
@ mighty ODE—I am a proud member of ODE and I know for a FACT, that they have lobbied the board for the past several YEARS to cut the fat at the top. What I also know, is that without any real union, we have no real negotiating power. Do you know of any other organization that actually gets called in to talk to Dekalb heads, and actually have their demands met? If so, please share. In the mean time, stop criticizing the ONLY organization to actually stands up to DCSS instead of cowering.
Dekalb resident
March 5th, 2010
4:30 pm
Regarding increasing classroom pupil teacher ratio:
If the BOE were really concerned about class sizes and ensuring teachers could provide individual help for struggling students, they would have cut, consolidated and outsourced in every area but the classroom. I think we need a BOE that puts the classroom first.
Please email your BOE members and also email our new interim superintendent Ms. Ramona Tyson.
Ms. Tyson’s email is:
Ramona_Tyson@fc.dekalb.k12.ga.us
I’m sure Ms. Tyson would be like to hear comments from DeKalb parents and taxpayers regarding the budget proposals.
@ say what? from a concerned taxpayer
March 5th, 2010
5:14 pm
say what? Good post on outsourcing DCSS services.
I agree with you. DCSS needs to gets bids on outsourcing jobs like Kitchen Mechanic and HVAC Mechanic. Let’s see what the market will bear for technical jobs such as these. Even if the salaries are comparable, we can cut our benefits and retirement costs (25% benefits and retirement override) for these employees and plow that money back into the classroom to help lower our pupil teacher ratio.
I’m sure you’ll agree that our students are the most important people in our school system and the only reason our school system exists. Outside the classroom, all costs need to be brought down by any means necessary.
Fed up
March 5th, 2010
5:18 pm
Dekalbite and saywhat: here is the problem with HVAC and Kitchen mechanics being hired at those salaries: 1. Benefit costs are huge 2.The avg. US salary for HVAC mechanic is $42k, with the middle half at $31-$51k. And this includes private sector jobs with lower benefits!! Also check out DeKalb salaries for non-teachers as compared with national averages…and you can see why we have so much fat.
Fed up
March 5th, 2010
5:22 pm
OK – here are the US stattistics for these positions – Average nat’l is $42k – and the middle 50% earn from $31 -$51 k – and this is likely private positions with normal (not inflated public sector) benefits. Google it and confirm for yourself. Outsource, indeed!
The mighty ODE
March 5th, 2010
5:42 pm
Nikole Allen, ODE’s website contradicts what you claim, as on their website they said they were opposed to any cuts in administration.
That may have changed as of late, but earlier in the year, when DeKalb was slashing retirement benefits for teachers, ODE stated on their website they did not support any cuts in administration.
Ernest
March 5th, 2010
5:44 pm
I thought the DeKalb staff did a good job with the spreadsheet they distributed during the meeting. Essentially it lists the various options (about 43), cost impact for each, then several scenarios, all totaling over $95 million dollars. What was scary is that in several of the options, about 50% of the burden for addressing this deficit is placed on current employees (1/2 for not matching retirement, 1/2 for furloughs/across the board salary cuts). IMO, furloughs will be preferred over salary cuts as that can impact their retirement payout. I don’t think employees will be happy at all with the non payment into retirement.
We should all acknowledge, what is happening in DeKalb is happening in most school districts around the county. It is being publicized more in ATL because of all the media attention already on the county. All districts will have tough decisions regarding what to cut in the budget, if they haven’t already made those decisions.
Ernest
March 5th, 2010
5:45 pm
Maureen, are you monitoring the filter????
Change the BOE
March 5th, 2010
6:07 pm
Ramona Tyson, the interim superintendent, built up DCSS MIS to a incredibly bloated bureaucracy of 250 staff and and $24 million budget. The thing is, MIS provides horrendous service and tech support to our teachers. if an administrator has a computer issue, bam, it’s fixed. Our teachers have to wait and wait and wait, and some are using ten year old computers!
DCSS is a cesspool of bloat. It focuses only on the Central Office, and ignores the clasroom and school buildings.
And the DeKalb Online Academy is wasteful and mediocre. There is no need for it since the state has a solid online academy. But DOLA does provide a job for our own county commission Sharon Barnes Sutton, who we all know about her recent issues.
mighty ODE
March 5th, 2010
6:18 pm
Nikole Allen, here is a quote from the ODE August ‘09 newsletter concerning the furloughs and cuts to teacher retirement.
-We could not identify any other large amount of money within the school system budget to make up the state funding cuts.
In a system widely reviled for its administrative bloat, ODE could find nothing of significance worth cutting to save the hit to teachers’ retirement benefits?
Here’s another quote
-As I stated earlier, the DeKalb BOE’s decision to suspend the contribution
to the TSA was the best of the bad alternatives.
How is it not reasonable to conclude, based on these two quotes, that ODE placed a higher priority on protecting administrative bloat, than they did on protecting teachers’ future retirement benefits?
mighty ODE
March 5th, 2010
6:23 pm
A correction in regard to ODE. There does not seem to be a specific sentence saying they oppose any cuts, as much as there is the statement that they could find no significant cuts to make, and therefore they supported the decision to cut the teacher retirement benefit.
Still, in a system well known for its administrative bloat, doesn’t the fact that ODE claimed they could find no significant cuts to make not suggest that they placed a higher priority on protecting administrative bloat, than they did protecting the retirement benefit that was at least temporarily cut?
@ say what? 4:52 pm
March 5th, 2010
6:25 pm
My room was 85 degrees yesterday (talk about money to burn). It’s been that way most of the winter.
The air/heat system is so noisy that sometimes I have to shout to be heard over it. Every day I come into my classroom there is a film of dust on my desks. I have many students with asthma. This can’t be healthy, and of course it’s not a good learning environment.
The students ask all the time about the heating and cooling system because it’s so uncomfortable. We’re the adults they’re with all day so of course they think we can fix it.
I’m not complaining about salaries. Teachers would just like to have a reasonably heated, cooled, and healthy environment for our students. We’re not getting that now.
@ say what?
March 5th, 2010
6:34 pm
As a teacher, I wouldn’t mind the HVAC and other Mechanic workers making that much money, if they did their job correctly the first time. The problem that I see, is that we hire people and they don’t really know what they are doing so we sit without air or heat for months at a time.
I would prefer to contract it out, however, I am not sure if the board would actually expect those contracted it out to do the job correctly the first time. It doesn’t appear to be the DCSS way to do things correctly the first time.
As a teacher, I find it difficult working for a system that doesn’t follow the golden rule that I was raised with: Do it right the first time. This goes for educating the children to fixing something not working properly.
I hope that all employees who are making over a certain salary threshold are going to see a pay reduction and not just teachers and administrators.
d
March 5th, 2010
7:47 pm
@mighty ODE…. do you honestly believe that there’s $26Million that can be cut at the administrative office? The cuts for the TSA this year were to stave off the 6 days of furloughs from the Governor’s office. While I don’t like it, I don’t know how my budget could have handled those days off without pay and I fear for next year. If you can provide numbers to show those savings, please do so. Otherwise, lay off of it. Your ignorance is tiring.
Mo' Freddie
March 5th, 2010
8:44 pm
@ mighty ODE: Are you a critics of the teachers’ associations in GA or are you a member of PAGE or MACE. If it is the latter, then shame on you. Quite frankly, none of the teachers’ associations haven’t done much to support their members or their memberships’ interests. However, if I were to choose between the three, I would choose ODE, a local affiliate of GAE, because of their national connection with NEA. In addition, they have done a lil’ “sumthin’ sumthin’” (protest at the school board in January…unfortunately, only once) this school year. If it is the former, then I agree with you that teachers’ reliance in these organizations will set them up for heartache. One will do what is allowed; if the teachers allowed the status quo to continue, then they have no one to blame but themselves. This is NOT the time to be complacent or comfortable, teachers.
Before teaching in GA, I taught in an unionized state and was affiliated with AFT. Since I don’t work in APS and NEA allows adminstrators within their membership folds, I don’t have memberships in any of the teachers’ associations here. (I will say, however, I do like MACE’s philosophy, but because it is not linked to a national organization and it is rumored that their teacher-members are black-balled, I don’t know…)
mighty ODE
March 5th, 2010
8:47 pm
So that we are clear d, are you saying that if a person can’t show where $26 million dollars of cuts are, it is ignorance to suggest they even try?
Are you going to suggest that DCSS is run so efficiently, that the only cuts that can be made without hurting student success are those few already suggested?
d
March 5th, 2010
9:35 pm
I’ll be honest, I am a teacher and I don’t really care that administrators are part of the teacher’s associations because the primary reason these associations exist in a non-union state are to advocate for public education — the working conditions of the educators and the learning conditions of the students — both of which go hand in hand. In my honest opinion, why should a teacher work his or her way up into administration and lose any right to advocacy when he or she needs it? I’m not saying some administrators don’t abuse their positions, but I know for a fact that when that happens, even if they are members, the policy of GAE is to advocate for the “lowest ring on the totem pole” — in other words the teacher.
As far as this particular situation in DeKalb is concerned, I am hoping that the board is looking long and hard at all options to prevent cuts to the classroom. I wonder about the vacant schools and why they are not on the market — if they are sold, not only will that bring an influx of cash to the table, but also add taxable property to the county so it will benefit us in the long run. I think the schools that are scheduled to go off of block scheduling next year should postpone that because it will result in the necessity of large textbook purchases — something we certainly don’t need to add to the bottom line right now.
Northview (Ex)Teacher
March 5th, 2010
9:46 pm
The news is also coming in from Fulton. I knew a long time ago that Katie, Ashley, and Cindy would manage to destroy public education in Fulton, but it hurts to see it actually happen. I’m glad I got while the getting was good, but this is so sad.
Tax cuts. Tax cuts. Tax cuts. Now there is no money for schools, but plenty of money in the pockets of the wealthy. Sometimes I think that we are no better than Brazil or Mexico.
Thank God that no one mentioned cutting football as a cost savings. Always money for jocks. Never money for anyone else.
I am so sad to see that Katie and Ashley have been so able in their pursuit of destroying public education and so utterly incompetent in every other aspect of their jobs.
Children and teachers deserve the best we can give, but republicans have taken it all away.
d
March 5th, 2010
10:18 pm
mighty ODE, what I am suggesting is that you have not offered any solutions yourself other than to bash the only organization that is at the table and making a difference in the management of DCSS.
Mo' Freddie
March 5th, 2010
10:30 pm
@ d: I respectfully disagree. Having adminstrators in the membership can cause a conflict of interest. Even with the “lowest ring on the totem pole” philosophy, in my opinion, that’s not good enough. I believe this is one of the reasons why GAE (and their local affiliates) and PAGE haven’t causes a major stir with education budget cuts or curruption in GA schools. Many administrators and teachers do not see eye-to-eye on several issues. How can these organizations effectively advocate for public education when they may have to cater to two different set of needs, especially when administrators have a bit more political clout than teachers? Too much politics and diplomacy. Not enough action and backbone. Afraid to rock the boat? I wonder why?
Besides, I betcha in both GAE and PAGE, most of their membership consist of teachers. Represent the hand that feed you! Stop sleeping with the emeny!
d
March 5th, 2010
10:43 pm
Mo Freddie — GAE’s administrative membership is about 3%. Since it is an affiliate of NEA, it is governed by the Representative Assembly, so where do you think the real power of this association lies? Not with the administrators. I can’t say much about PAGE now, but I do know its history and you are right there, it was founded by DeKalb administrators who didn’t want to give up power to the Representative Assembly — they actually disaffiliated from NEA to not have to do so. If that’s still the case, I don’t know, but nevertheless, as far as GAE is concerned, I’m not worried about 3%.
mighty ODE
March 5th, 2010
10:50 pm
Just so we are clear d, when an organization is charged with protecting your rights, as well as the rights of your boss, many of your boss’s peers, and possibly even your boss’s boss, you take the leap of faith that your interests will be 100% represented with no conflict of interest?
No wonder Kathy Cox thinks she can get teachers to take a leap of faith when it comes to merit pay.
d
March 5th, 2010
10:59 pm
mighty ODE — I have seen it in action, so I know the system works. Again, where are the solutions? We are facing a deficit of $88,000,000. I don’t like to say it, but I have to agree with at least one assessment that there must be a millage rate increase. We do need to trim the fat and ODE has argued for this and continues to do so. I wonder, though, how excluding part of the educational system can possibly advance the goals of an organization who prides itself on advocating for excellence in public schools? Whether we like it or not, we will have administrators, so let’s work for a common solution.
mighty ODE
March 5th, 2010
11:11 pm
Here’s a solution d. Start at the very top of the organization, with the superintendent’s office and work your way down the organizational chart. For each position, ask if there would be a demonstrable, detrimental effect in the day to day life of the student in the classroom if that position was eliminated.
At the very least, if you don’t want to make draconian cuts, make sure that when those positions are identified, the last people in them will be the very last people who will ever be in them. And then, to make the best use of people who have been identified as serving in positions that aren’t essential, take them and put them back in a classroom, in a copy machine room, in an in school suspension room, somewhere where they can finish their careers actually providing a direct benefit to students.
It’s a start.
mighty ODE
March 5th, 2010
11:19 pm
d I have proposed a solution, but the blog creature ate it.
mighty ODE
March 5th, 2010
11:26 pm
I’ll try again d. Here’s a solution. Start with the superintendent’s job, and work your way down the organizational chart. If it can’t be shown that the job has the direct benefit of supporting the classroom teacher, eliminate the job.
If you don’t want to be draconian about it, grandfather the current people in, but make d@mn sure they are the last people who will ever hold the position.
Follow that up with putting a moratorium on all new positions.
Then take those people, whose positions have been determined to be non essential, and let them finish their careers inside a school building, where they can be of direct benefit to the classroom teacher.
There’s one possible solution.
say what?
March 6th, 2010
3:15 am
wow I touched a nerve. I agree that HVAC should be outsourced, and the most qualified should be hired. As a parent I am angered when I see two or three tech’s come out to a school, and then the custodians are needed to help them do their jobs. The main computer that controls air/heating should be switched to regional computers that control upto 5 schools at a time. Something else has to be done with HVAC.
I never said that teachers and students are pesky, but the school SYSTEM is more than teachers and students. All stakeholders and employees should align themselves to the goal of students achieving and graduating. I do find that some of the blog comments are always centered around what the teachers are sacrificing. Many others sacrifice as well in this downturn. Take for instance the $400K being used in Clayton to keep up with buses- teachers think that money should go to their salaries. If DCSS had a tracking system, we would better see the amount of diesel being used for drivers to stop at QT, go to the grocery store, etc.
We are all in this together, and I do empathize with teachers and students.
@say what
March 6th, 2010
9:08 am
“…the school SYSTEM is more than teachers and students…”
That’s where you are wrong. Students and teachers ARE the classroom – you can’t have one without the other. Classrooms are the school SYSTEM. The sole reason for a school system to exist is to educate children.
Taxpayers only pay for a school system so that teachers can teach their children. A school system is not a “jobs machine”. All jobs including the superintendent are less important than what goes on in the classroom between students and their teachers.
I know you hold an administrative position in the school system (tip off – “All stakeholders and employees should align themselves to the goal of students achieving and graduating” – that’s a buzz phrase I’ve heard too often in meetings outside the schoolhouse).
Many DCSS parents/taxpayers are struggling to meet their mortgage payments and pay their taxes. They are not paying taxes (70% of which go to the school SYSTEM) for any other reason than to get a good education for their children. They don’t make this sacrifice to establish career paths for school employees.
Parents just want reasonably sized classrooms with competent teachers and abundant access to cutting edge science and technology equipment. DCSS does not currently have this, and if we pack more students into classrooms, there will be no hope of getting what the parents/taxpayers want.
If getting the optimal educational experience for children requires cuts, consolidation and outsourcing of personnel not teaching their children, you bet parents/taxpayers will support that.
Teacher from the Heart
March 6th, 2010
10:50 am
The most significant consequences of most of Georgia’s school finance system is that too much revenue is targeted toward administering school programs and budgets rather than raising student achievement. More money is allocated towards central office and resource instructional positions than to classroom level instruction. Many of the supervisory and resource instructional positions do not clearly increase student achievement.
It is critical to work toward an education budget process that encourages cost-consciousness at the local level, shifts resources from non-instructional budget categories into classroom-level spending, and truly equalizes per-pupil funding based on the individual characteristics of students
Teacher from the Heart
March 6th, 2010
10:51 am
@Mighty ODE….I so totally agree.
Teacher from the Heart
March 6th, 2010
11:04 am
I just read something that was quite interesting….
“Other states have reduced overall spending while increasing per-pupil spending by shutting down categorical programs. According to the Sacramento Bee, the state of Maryland went through a comprehensive two-year process to streamline categorical programs. A new system was adopted in the 2002-2003 school year that called for increasing basic per-child “foundation” amounts over a six-year period, from about $4,300 to more than $6,100. One of the most significant changes in Maryland involved ending state categorical programs. Maryland got rid of about 30 of its categoricals and added the revenue to the basic allocations. The elimination of the 30 Maryland categoricals freed up more than $300 million a year that helped boost foundation funding for all students. In other words, more money was targeted to students and less money went to administering programs in Maryland.”
Perhaps something our Georgia systems could consider….this may help reduce the administrative positions throughout the state. More emphasis on the classroom – less emphasis on administration of programs.
Bell Curve
March 6th, 2010
11:08 pm
I don’t teach in Dekalb, but our technology is also heavily geared towards the administrative positions. We were once told in a meeting that we (teachers) were last on the fix list, everyone else was more important than we were.