In light of our earlier blog today on consolidating rural schools in Georgia, here is a brand new report that says rural schools routinely use practices that could be useful to boosting student performance in their urban and suburban counterparts.
Here is the release from the Alliance for Excellent Education about its report, Current Challenges and Opportunities in Preparing Rural High School Students for Success in College and Careers:
Washington, DC –Despite rural high schools often being shortchanged by current federal education policies, a new report from the Alliance for Excellent Education finds that rural schools routinely use practices that could be useful to boosting student performance in their urban and suburban counterparts.
“As the Congress prepares to take up major education legislation this year, this report clearly should help federal policymakers recognize the important role that rural schools can play in improving student outcomes,” said Bob Wise, president of the Alliance for Excellent Education and former governor of West Virginia.
“America’s rural high schools offer solutions, but they also face challenges,” Wise continued. “Most of the recent debate on high school reform at the federal level has not involved rural schools, but when one out of every four rural students fails to graduate from high school, it’s not just a ‘local’ issue, it’s a national crisis. No longer can our nation write off large numbers of children, whether by race or by geography, and still meet the steadily growing skill demands of the 21st century.”
According to the report, Current Challenges and Opportunities in Preparing Rural High School Students for Success in College and Careers, the tight-knit nature of rural communities has resulted in the development of promising practices in meeting the challenge of preparing students for success in the 21st century. For example, in the highly personal rural environment, at-risk students are not as likely to be overlooked. Additionally, successful rural high schools have utilized online courses and other distance learning to expand advanced learning opportunities for their students. By using local businesses as “place-based” learning opportunities, schools engage students’ interests, which often creates a college- and career-ready culture.
One third of the nation’s high schools are rural and that number is on the rise, the report finds. Nationally, one in five children attends a rural school. This growth in enrollment brings new challenges such as growing population diversity in the form of English language learners and additional costs for bilingual teachers, new curricula, and other services.
Current Challenges and Opportunities finds that rural high schools receive disproportionately lower amounts of Title I dollars, the largest source of federal funding for low-income school districts. Often characterized by declining local tax bases, rural school districts also encounter difficulty generating sufficient property tax revenues. Furthermore, rural districts have less staff to apply for additional competitive grant funds.
Financial constraints are just one of the challenges that the report identifies. A shortage of teachers trained to deliver a rigorous college- and career-prep curriculum, difficulty in addressing the needs of an increasingly diverse student body, limited social service support, and less access to teacher professional development create other challenges in ensuring that all students in rural areas graduate from high school prepared for college, work, and life.
The challenge for the federal government, working with local and state partners, is to develop policy solutions that recognize and address the unique circumstances that rural high schools and communities present. As the report notes, it is imperative that federal leaders understand the full impact—and unintended consequences—of current education reform efforts on America’s rural communities as Congress begins to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
“Whether a rural-educated child remains in her community or begins a career in Silicon Valley, our nation desperately needs her operating at the maximum of her ability,” said Wise. “Building the nation’s capacity to prepare rural secondary school students for success in college and careers will improve America’s competitiveness, strengthen rural economies, and ensure that every child is a graduate with an opportunity to succeed. It is my hope that the Congress will use ESEA reauthorization to address the diverse and unique needs of rural high schools and their communities,” said Wise.
10 comments Add your comment
ScienceTeacher671
February 10th, 2010
6:12 am
One third of the nation’s high schools are rural, and 1 in five children attends a rural school….wonder what the percentages are in Georgia? And how many of the rural schools in Georgia are considered “successful”?
New report: Rural school practices can aid urban, suburban systems …
February 10th, 2010
6:27 am
[...] here: New report: Rural school practices can aid urban, suburban systems … Posted in School | Tags: a-brand-new, brand-new, earlier, georgia, our-earlier, [...]
catlady
February 10th, 2010
7:22 am
We should understand the definition of rural that is being used here. Many of our “rural” schools in Georgia are not actually classified as rural due to the proximity of suburbia and exurbia.
Uncle Commode
February 10th, 2010
8:52 am
Just more BS from the Feds.
New report: Rural school practices can aid urban, suburban systems … Image
February 10th, 2010
9:37 am
[...] from: New report: Rural school practices can aid urban, suburban systems … Tags: brand-new, earlier, georgia, our-earlier, routinely-use, says-rural, today-on-consolidating [...]
Teacher&mom
February 10th, 2010
9:52 am
I teach in a rural system that does a very good job educating its students. Test scores are strong. Graduation rates need to improve but several years ago, several counties in our area created a charter school that offers an evening program for local high school students. Slowly but surely more students are graduating high school in my area. At the local high school, our graduates that go on to college have a very good track record.
I also teach in a system that has a HIGH number of teachers with advanced degrees and several NBC teachers. For many years, our local board and superintendent has encouraged teachers to seek advanced degrees because they know the pay-off for them is a stronger system. Teachers are also strongly encouraged to seek reading endorsements/gifted certification/ and take classes to add special education certifications to their certificates. The central office has worked with our local RESA to bring these classes right to our door steps by offering the classes in the evenings.
I feel that my system is a good example of why local control can and does work.
Gwinnett Parent
February 10th, 2010
1:43 pm
“in the highly personal rural environment, at-risk students are not as likely to be overlooked.” I attended a rural school and the teachers were happy to see the problem children disappear. Let’s face it, a lot of the students in rural communities come from households where education is not a priority. No matter how much the teacher tries, these students will drop out. On the other hand, I am glad to see that they are trying to help out the college prep students. In my day you were on your own. The counselors were there only for the problem students. The only help they provided were college guide books on the bottom shelf of their office.
ScienceTeacher671
February 10th, 2010
7:08 pm
Gwinnett Parent, when I taught in a rural system, the principal would actively encourage the problem children to go home & not come back, but that was pre-NCLB. I do think the atmosphere was much more personal, and I think in general the children behave better when you go to church with them and see them (and their parents) at the grocery store, the drug store, and the ball park, and when you’ve taught their older siblings, etc. Education past the high school level was not a huge priority in that community. Our rural school could not offer the college prep and gifted students much, though – it was also pre-virtual school.
My question this morning was intended to try to find how many schools like that exist in Georgia, and how many are taking advantage of the advanced capabilities now available to them.
Connie Jenkins
February 11th, 2010
12:37 pm
I don’t feel like the A/B scores some schools are reporting reflect the true abilities of the students. I was shocked to find out that my kids who made A/B scores could not even write a decent essay in proper English, including spelling, sentence structure and punctuation. That was when I sat them down and taught them what they should have been taught in English class.
I spoke to other parents about this and found out that their children were having the same problems. Are the schools ‘giving’ the students good grades to make the school look good? If so, then we as tax payers are not getting our money’s worth.
Tim
May 25th, 2010
3:17 pm
What’s the criteria used to classify Georgia schools as “rural”, “urban” or “suburban”? Is there a population range? If so… where could I find that information?