“Super” seniors denied HOPE for extra semester. Is it fair?

Morning folks,

I am running this op-ed on the Monday education page in the AJC. It is by a UGA “super” senior.

While I don’t think we are going to see any expansion of the HOPE Scholarship this year or in the near future, I think she makes good points. Enjoy the piece and let’s discuss. I think this is a big issue at Georgia Tech where kids often go longer than four years.

(Monday morning 8:22: By the way, Amanda has come onto the blog to respond to some of the critical comments to her piece. Thanks, Amanda, for taking on the critics.

And to the critics, let’s keep this discussion civil.  I know that most of us are used to the wild west nature of the online world, but this may well be Amanda’s first foray. She may never come back again. Maureen.)

Please read her entry.

By Amanda Hammons

I am a “super-senior” at the University of Georgia.

The HOPE Scholarship has provided the resources necessary to maximize my college experience and allowed me to soak in the five-star education here in Athens until now.
Before entering college, I listened to the sage advice offered to me to get involved. I am a prime example of putting into college what I wanted to get out of it.

I will graduate this month with honors and a dual-degree in marketing and sport management. At the same time, I served as president of the Sports Business Club and raised more than a thousand dollars for campus philanthropies.

Having made the most of these last 4 ½ years at UGA, you can imagine the disappointment and dismay I felt when I learned that my HOPE Scholarship had expired for my last semester because I took too many courses.

Utilizing HOPE to further my education, I am now stricken of the resources needed to accomplish as much as I could in a short amount of time because I was too ambitious.

I place no judgment on students in Georgia receiving HOPE Scholarship who do just enough to sneak by each credit checkpoint. HOPE seeks to provide underprivileged students access to higher education.

What I don’t comprehend is why students with the highest level of pride in their studies, students who dedicate time and energy to rising above the norm, are not given the chance to continue or even finish their goals. I think these students merit another look by the HOPE Scholarship committee.

My proposition allows students with a 3.5 grade point average or better to be granted the chance to appeal scholarship revocation due to exceeding the 127-credit hour limit.
Of course, this extension would be conditional on maintaining the strong grade point average.
This extension opportunity not only encourages the HOPE student to maximize their college experience, but also explore the chance to grow by pursuing multiple majors/minors.

In my opinion, the HOPE Scholarship is the only business that not only takes away the benefits of success in school, but, in some capacity, inhibits them.

I felt compelled to bring this injustice to the public’s attention. Yes, I could have earned one degree and graduated last May, but my resume would have been void of a much-needed internship, and I would have had to sacrifice the presidential role of a club I have invested my heart into at UGA.

This involvement led to a scholarship that contributed to two tuitions over the summer, one for calculus, one for internship credit.

Many would argue that one degree is “just fine,” but I chose to persist because my family sacrificed to support my dreams when HOPE would not.

There are many families and students who cannot shoulder the burden of educational costs, even for a single semester. Even though ambition may spur a student to continue in college, it can’t pay bills.

Limiting college education for bright young adults is a slippery slope that begins with discouragement to continue learning.

I believe that granting a HOPE appeal to successful, driven students to further their pursuit of a higher education is not only a positive educational reinforcement, but also a powerful reflection on the importance of reaching your highest potential.

Super-seniors should be given the chance to continue hoping, dreaming, and earning without fear of financial burdens.

136 comments Add your comment

Parent

December 13th, 2009
6:54 am

Congratulations on your successes. You’ve made great choices to be involved in your school beyond the classroom, experiences that will serve you well in the business world. Which brings me to my point …

The scholarship must have limits. There’s a budget involved in funding and the business of managing that budget requires an end in sight. We hear about the “professional student,” a term usually associated negatively with a person who enjoys school (and no job) so much they just keep registering. In this example you’re on a positive track to double majors but with no limit as you propose, what’s to stop you from a triple major?

You knew the Hope rules when you signed the papers 4 1/2 years ago. You did read them didn’t you? So as you reached the 127 limit during Fall quarter registration what was your plan for Spring?

ScienceTeacher671

December 13th, 2009
7:55 am

Long, long ago, in the days before HOPE, there was another student with a four-year full-tuition scholarship. This student graduated with a double major by exempting many of her core courses (AP courses in high school, or SAT2 tests after high school could do this today), and concentrating on major coursework, as well as extracurricular activities.

I admire Ms. Hammons’ accomplishments, and am glad that she and her family felt they were worth the further investment. I suspect that there are other scholarship organizations, not funded by the state (or the lottery commission, or whoever we’re crediting this week) that might have found her worthy.

KennesawMom

December 13th, 2009
8:55 am

Hopefully, there is a happy medium. Like Parent, there must be a llmit to Hope. It is soo easy to stay in college, particularly now when jobs are scarce, and just keep racking up the classes. Also, it really gets to me when everyone knows the rules but then expects exceptions. However, Ms. Hammonds, does seem like an exception to the rule. If there was an appeal process where should could truly present her case, including a plan that shows the end of her college career, then that seems fair

Angela

December 13th, 2009
9:33 am

let me start out by saying that certainly agree that HOPE needs to be limited. Students in Georgia are lucky to even have the state pay for some of their education. Unfortunately, so many are using HOPE that the state is running out of money. When the state runs out of money for mere education, the Board of Regents must force universities to cut out classes. When classes are cut, it forces students to stay in school longer just to meet graduation requirements. That said, these students expect HOPE to continue paying.

This not only affect HOPE recipients, but those who pay out of pocket as well. I am a full time student (older) who pays out of pocket, and I am forced to extend my graduation date another semester for 1 class. Why? lack of funding to offer the class year round. Maybe if HOPE limited their funds………………………………….

just sayin..

Erin

December 13th, 2009
11:21 am

I find it highly suspect that Ms. Hammonds absolutely had to take an extra semester of credit hours to achieve her dual degrees. If she had properly planned her course schedule in her first four years, utilizing free electives for her second degree, she most likely could have secured both degrees without exceeding the HOPE credit limit. Further, an internship could have been taken post-graduation (not for credit of course) and still supplemented her academic credentials.

Ms. Hammonds seems intelligent enough that she should have planned for this extra semester and researched other financial options.

Lee

December 13th, 2009
11:34 am

My daughter graduated UGA with dual majors and had to attend a 5th year. Trust me, there was no fluff built into her schedule.

I paid the 5th year out of pocket and was grateful for the financial assistance that HOPE provided for the first four years.

That said, I have long been a proponent of making the HOPE Scholarship a REIMBURSEMENT program where the student pays tuition out of pocket, attends class, and then gets reimbursed by HOPE based on the results of their grades.

In my opinion, a reimbursement program would eliminate the student who goes to college for a year, goofs off and loses HOPE, and then drops out never to return. It would also eliminate the grade inflation at the high school level because the HOPE scholarship is now based on college work instead of the high schooler’s GPA to qualify.

To Ms Hammonds, I would say that you graduated from UGA with two degrees and all you paid in matriculation fees is approximately $7000. A pretty sweet deal if you ask me.

drew (former teacher)

December 13th, 2009
12:00 pm

Congrats to Ms. Hammons on her success at UGA. It’s obvious that she is an intelligent young lady, so it’s a little surprising to read her editorial, which comes across to me as simply whining that “it isn’t fair”. Ms. Hammons should be thrilled that the state of Georgia has paid for the bulk of her 4-1/2 years at UGA.

I was also the beneficiary of the Hope scholarship, when I went back to school at the age of 40 to obtain my teaching degree. My Hope scholarship also “expired” prior to my graduation, due to some courses I had taken 20 years earlier during my first attempt at college. Even though Hope did not exist at the time, the classes I had taken/attempted were still counted as part of my Hope scholarship. So I had to pay out of pocket for my last year. The idea of complaining about the fairness of this never crossed my mind…I was just happy that Hope paid for most of it.

I also have two sons in college right now, one at UGA, and another at a junior college, and both have Hope. But even with the Hope scholarship, both of my sons have had to take out student loans to cover the gap between Hope and the actual costs associated with college. But you’re not going to hear me whining about it. Hope has already saved me thousands of dollars, with the potential to save me thousands more.

As “Parent” stated, the Hope scholarship is not open ended…there are limits. These limits are published and fairly straight forward, so students need to keep these in mind when choosing their college paths. Choices have consequences. Ms. Hammond made her choices, and the consequence is that she will have bear some of the costs of her education. Sounds fair enough to me.

JLM

December 13th, 2009
12:07 pm

I’m also a college student in GA and fully understand that HOPE funds are available up to a maximum number of credits. That’s the way it works, period. If you’re allowed to get extra monies for additional credit hours, the entire program will be compromised. There are rules, we work with them. Focus your energies on gaining employment for paying for extra credits like everyone else.

Mack Easton

December 13th, 2009
12:27 pm

I am also a super super senior! As in age!! I would have been overjoyed if the Hope Scholarship existed in the early 50’s. Wow, nothing to do except maintain a minimum GPA, absorb knowledge and whine about not getting more financial assistance. I obtained my education bit by bit, year by year, paid for by me, bit by bit. Lots of sacrifices! No loans, no financial assistance and I am grateful I live in a country that allowed me to progress.

The purpose of the Hope Scholarship is to enable young Georgians in obtaining a college degree. Specifically, for those who could not otherwise afford college tuition but have the potential to progress by attending a higher learning institution. HOPE was never intended to produce or enable double degree graduates or make exceptions for anyone. To do so would be a form of bias.

If, as in Ms Hammond’s case, a person excels in pursuit of their higher education goals, that indicates the Hope Scholarship for the individual is/was a good investment.

For those who obtain a Hope Scholarship degree and want to continue climbing the educational ladder, they may do so while working in the “real world”. By taking continuing courses, online or otherwise. Some employers encourage and pay for further educational courses. Additionally, there are numerous opportunities for grants from many philanthropic
philantrophic foundations if the grants enable exceptional individuals to progress in fields that benefit society. There are also federal government grants for special fields.

Ms Hammond deserves congratulations on her accomplishments thus far. But, I detect a bit of selfishness and sarcasm in two of her remarks. I quote #1: “Yes, I could have earned one degree and graduated last May, but my resume would have been void of a much-needed internship, and I would have had to sacrifice the presidential role of a club I have invested my heart into at UGA.” Well, Ms Hammond, get used to sacrifices, particularly those of a personal nature. There will be many in your future.

The second quote ( her opinion) and one I totally disagree with is: “In my opinion, the HOPE Scholarship is the only business that not only takes away the benefits of success in school, but, in some capacity, inhibits them.” WHAT!!! This is an INSULT to the Hope Scholarship program and has overtones of “entitlement” instead of “Thank You,Hope Scholarship”.

Be grateful Ms Hammond! It is time to leave the security of the academic world, get a job, pay taxes, put your education to work, make sacrifices when necessary and keep climbing.

You will find the “real world” does not reward you for what you might like to be. It rewards you for what you can actually accomplish with the educational background and tools you have to offer.

My perception and opinion of Ms Hammond is she is NOT thankful for what the Hope Scholarship has done for her and now wants to change it to suit her personal needs.

Could it be that Ms Hammond is also having a problem “stepping down” from her exalted “presidential” role in a club.

The Hope Scholarship is a one time investment in our younger college age citizens for a single college degree, not preparation for double degrees and beyond.

Rules are rules. Waivers of rules are a form of selective bias. The Hope Scholarship should never permit exceptions to the amount of educational assistance.

If Ms Hammond really wants to pursue higher no or litttle cost eduation here is an excellent solution and opportunity if she can “hack” it!!!!! A “whiner” will not “hack” it!

http://www.myfuture.com/militaryopps/militarycollegeprograms_all.html

Philosopher

December 13th, 2009
1:40 pm

@Lee- I SO agree. I LOVE the Hope scholarship as I know personally that many great kids have been able to attend college ONLY because of its existence. But let’s be sensible here. Many businesses offer college reimbursement just as you suggested…and knowing that money is coming back is a great motivator. Kids fresh out of highschool have a hell of a lot of growing up to do. Let them do it at their own expense. Afterall, after the first semester,each successful semester would bring money for the next. A sensible solution and a BIG money saver for taxpayers!

Ole Guy

December 13th, 2009
1:55 pm

Amanda, you are one “hard charger”…congrats on your steadfast focus on your goals. However, Drew pretty much hit the nail on the head; you should be quite pleased with the level of funding you have received thus far. Continue the “super senior” mentality in all you do. If that means finding alternate funding sources, so be it. There’s only so much “tea” in the barrel…allow others the same opportunities you’ve enjoyed. Godspeed, Amanda.

Atlanta_Tiger_Fan

December 13th, 2009
2:16 pm

Youth like her should get the additional funds for the extra year in college. To offset this cost, the Hope scholarship should be handed out with more discipline. With the existing grade inflation, we’re giving money to kids that don’t have a chance at being successful in college and should maybe consider technical school. We should also recoup HOPE funds from kids that flunk out after 1 year.

Stop Whining

December 13th, 2009
2:19 pm

Amanda, You should be so grateful that you live in Georgia where there is a Hope scholarship instead of complaining because you might have to actually pay for one semester of college. Don’t you realize that most students have to take out student loans or have their parents pay for college? The Hope scholarship paid for what they said they would pay for. You were the one who chose to have a double major. You should be extremely grateful that you have gotten a great education for the cost of only one semester of college. Most people aren’t as lucky.

Old School

December 13th, 2009
2:21 pm

Parent and Drew, you hit the nail right on the head. Lee, I agree with you about the reimbursement idea. Amanda, quit your whining and be thankful that you had the HOPE scholarship for as long as you did. By the way, I don’t see any plan of what Amanda intends to do after graduation. It would have been nice to see what she was planning to contribute back to society in return for her 4 1/2 years of education which was mostly paid for by the taxpayers.

Another Parents

December 13th, 2009
2:22 pm

I just wanted to get on record with congratulating Ms. Hammond on her successes thus far and to reiterate the comments of other posters. There has to be a limit to HOPE. There’s an awful lot of scholarship & grant money out there for achievers like Ms. Hammond, but as another commenter already said, if she’s able to grad. w/a dual degree w/an impressive resume and pay less than $10K she’s way ahead of her peers. Be grateful, dearie, that you had HOPE for the first 4.5 years and drive on.

Courtney

December 13th, 2009
2:25 pm

10 years ago HOPE was a great gift. Now it is an entitlement. Gimme Gimme!

Jason

December 13th, 2009
2:32 pm

I worked and paid for my own education and living expenses in days before Hope. I think I appreciate it a lot more. Get a job and a life.

Shan

December 13th, 2009
2:47 pm

I have a 3.97 GPA and I too have exhausted my HOPE funds two semesters ago when I decided to double major. I am not complaining as I am a senior in my final semester who knew perfectly well what I was getting into. I appreciate having access to the HOPE program in the first place because without it, college would have been just a dream. You knew that the HOPE scholarship paid for a limited amount of hours–no exceptions. Instead of whining, be grateful that you have access to such a program, because everyone is not so lucky.

Philosopher

December 13th, 2009
2:49 pm

@Jason- many of us busted ass and paid for our own education-and some of us earned scholarships-before HOPE. While I think HOPE is offered to too many and that it should be earned and limited, I do not begrude deserving kids being helped through HOPE… I can’t see wishing hardship on folks just because I had it hard. Didn’t your folks want YOU to have a better life than they did? There is no need to be cruel just because it wasn’t available for you.

DB

December 13th, 2009
2:50 pm

I wonder if Ms. Hammonds would have been a little more judicious in her use of time and credits in the last four years if she had been footing the bill on her own instead of HOPE? Knowing that HOPE is taking care of the bulk of the expenses tends to give students a certain amount of freedom that they don’t have if they are paying the entire bill, and tend to make people scramble just a bit to get up and out in a timely manner.

At a major public university in North Carolina (not sure if this is the same for the entire N.C. university system), you can stay in school up to 140 hours. After 140 hours, you pay DOUBLE. Tends to cut down on the professional students :-) However, we’re running into a slight problem in that my son entered school with almost 30 hours of AP credit — and we’re wondering if his university is going to force him to graduate “early”. When he registered for the 2010 spring semester, he was surprised to see that he was designated as a “senior”, even though he is a junior. Because of the freedom the 30 hours bought him from intro classes, he was able to jump right into major classes and do the double major, and is now literally searching for classes to take to complete the minor, while at the same time staying under 140 hours, AND not getting “kicked out” a semester early, because of some of his leadership commitments in various campus organizations.

To Ms. Hammonds: HOPE is a great thing, but don’t get greedy.

Student

December 13th, 2009
2:51 pm

We all know we have a 127 credit hour max on a free scholarship that requires nothing more than an application and a minimum GPA. It’s not really fair to ask for more when – as was said – the scholarship helps those that can’t pay. Be happy with what you got and pay for it if you want more. It’s that simple.

dj

December 13th, 2009
2:59 pm

The argument is that if you extend it to people who double major then why not to those who went on to graduate school. I knew what from the beginning that I was going to get a master’s level education at least and I took the required courses I needed to, graduated, and continued on to my masters. I feel like there has to be a limit. Congratulations on your accomplishments. You will get two degrees and if you have to pay for one semester at UGA, it seems like you will have to pay about 3000 dollars for that education.

mike

December 13th, 2009
2:59 pm

HOPE was just that when it started out. It was originally for those who had the grades but not the money. Interesting how all who were against the lottery now take advantage of the HOPE system. You need to stop crying about needing more money. Get a job and get on with your life. When you entered school you understood what the schedule was. It is printed in black and white. And to Old School, the HOPE is paid by those who play the lottery. Not all taxpayers. Stop twisting the truth.

Frank

December 13th, 2009
3:13 pm

Ms. Hammonds apparently is under the illusion of grandeur that because she is an awesome student that the taxpayers of the state of Georgia are duty bound to provide her with every academic dream that she has. Bad news Ms. Hammonds: The taxpayers of the state owe you nothing. As for HOPE, I trust that you do understand that the proceeds that provide your HOPe come from the wallets of those who bet on a dream to be rich in a game that is incredibly slanted in favor of the house (the state).

I would suggest that you get a job to earn money to take those extra credits you so desire.

My academic experience was funded by a combination of friends, family, scholarships, loans, and yes…..WORK! This last piece of the college experience was the most valuable of all. It kept me connected with “ordinary” folks while I pursued my dreams in the oasis of academia. Today, I’m finishing a doctorate while working full time as an educator in the state of Georgia.

I wish Ms. Hammonds well in her future endeavors, but please remember that your life is shaped more by the efforts you earn than from what you demand be given to you.

PHS

December 13th, 2009
3:26 pm

My son is in the same boat. Honors student @ GCSU, but because he changed majors and had to take extra classes his HOPE funding has also run out. The Hope scholarship has been a blessing for the past four years so I’m not complaining about having to come out of pocket to help him in this last semester.

I do agree with Lee in that Hope should be a reward – reimbursement based on good grades, and not an entitlement. Rather than take Hope away as a punishment for poor grades, make it a reward for good grades.

I am totally opposed in using these funds for daycare services disguised as a “Pre-K” education program. Children coming out of these programs are no better equipped for elementary school than children who are raised at home or in other day care programs.

It would be much more beneficial to use these funds to further assist hard working students with their books or to assist hard working adults who need to further their education to make themselves more marketable in a tough economy.

UGA parent

December 13th, 2009
3:27 pm

Ms. Hammonds, there is this thing called “Student Loans”. I know about this because my son is a 5th year student due to changing his major. He too maxed out HOPE and he has taken out a loan to pay for his last year of school.
The interest rates and the amount of time to pay for these loans are very reasonable and a bright woman like you should have no problem paying for them with the job your hard work will procure.

Like several have said, don’t be greedy. Your proposition would hamstring a program that is in place to help all Georgians that can maintain a 3.0, not just the very top students.

Former UGA student

December 13th, 2009
3:47 pm

We could just do away with HOPE altogether – that would end the argument :)

On a more serious note, I utilized HOPE myself and am thankful for it. I didn’t just “squeak by” as the author of the editorial makes anyone out to be that does not double major. As a matter of fact, I would dare say that I was more involved during my 3 1/2 years of college (I graduated early) that she is.

One must recognize that HOPE has a definie price. By allowing students to take as many classes as they want, cost-free, it would discourage many from ever graduating. I would probably still be having a great time in college even today if everything was taken care of. The author talks of a “slippery slope” Well, there would certainly be one if we decided to up the ante on HOPE. Where would we stop paying for college tuition? Pay for a second major? A Masters program? A Doctorate? Furthermore, where is the money going to come from?

In summary, though she may mean well, the author of this editorial seems very spoiled. She does not see the gift of free education that she has already been given and is complaining because she wants more. Sorry Amanda, you can not have everything for free.

willie

December 13th, 2009
3:47 pm

You can not be a professional student and expect HOPE to pay for it. You took to many courses for the degree you were seeking. Sorry, but get a loan. The state owes you nothing.

Gail

December 13th, 2009
3:48 pm

All that Amanda has achieved is commendable. However, the limit on HOPE hours is not a secret held out by the HOPE scholarship program until Amanda’s last semester. She seems to be a smart person and should have known that there is a limit on number of hours covered.

Does she think it would be right to cover her extra hours (and others in the same situation) for a double major and then next year or sometime soon the HOPE funds run out and students won’t even be covered for one degree? There has to be a limit.

Be happy for the 127 hours that were covered.

willie

December 13th, 2009
3:53 pm

I thougth the HOPE was for students with good grades but with a family of a certain income limit. I see too many rich kids getting HOPE and I think that is wrong.

just stating the obvious

December 13th, 2009
3:55 pm

Wahhhhh, wahhhhhh, wahhhhh. You knew the limits to the Hope before you started college. Get over your entitlement mentality before it’s too late.

ms. obvious

December 13th, 2009
3:55 pm

The problem here is fairness. It was her decision to get two degrees, but Hope only pays for one. My husband who transfered to Georgia Tech, had to take an extra semester of classes, and had to pay out of pocket that semester because he ran out of hope money as well. There has to be some sort of medium. HOPE allows for a few extra classes, but not enough for a full extra semester. They have to have a cut off point. I would have loved for HOPE to pay for my Masters degree, but they won’t do that either. Why is that unfair? I would prefer though, that HOPE be around for my daughter, and I’ll just pay for my masters out of pocket. I felt extremely lucky that I was able to get my 4 years paid for by HOPE. Lets not get greedy here. If you are a “super senior” then good for you! You should have no problem paying back one or two extra semesters of student loans in order for future generations to get HOPE. You may even be able to look into some other possible scholarships. HOPE pays for four years, and we should be thankful for that. Don’t get greedy.

sab

December 13th, 2009
4:00 pm

That’s right Amanda! How dare you go above and beyond expectations and then expect to continue to receive any support. Don’t you know there are lottery officials waiting for their bonuses? And although this money is freely given by those who play the lottery, we’ll just call it a “tax” and I am SO tired of paying for stuff like education and police protection and hospitals! I’d rather see my money go towards something more important…like an unnecessary war! How dare you!!!

GA Teacher

December 13th, 2009
4:00 pm

Congratulations on your accomplishments! You are the type of student that the taxpayers want to fund. However, you are also old enough to understand the compromises needed to make the “world go ’round.” For the advantage of having a great internship on your resume, you had to give up graduating in 4 years and spend a bit more money. That is life, sweetheart. You are going to be hard pressed to find sympathy.

Logic

December 13th, 2009
4:01 pm

The HOPE scholarship program for graduating high school seniors could be greatly improved by factoring into the decision the student’s SAT or ACT score. Too many high schools inflate grades making the GPA worthless. Some students graduated with 3.8 GPA and that same student needs remedial courses before they could enter regular college classes.

Why not require a 1,000 SAT score and 2.5 GPA was needed to qualify?

Too many students attend one year of college and then drop out because they lose HOPE funding. Most of those student were never qualified nor motivated to attend college.

Flowery Branch Yellow Jacket

December 13th, 2009
4:07 pm

My daughter will also graduate from UGA this semester with honors, and like Amanda, she too did not have access to HOPE funds for her final semester. In her case, the issue was not double majors or changing majors, but rather a change in the summer course offerings at UGA this year. The one course that she needed to complete before her eligibility expired was not offered due to budget cutbacks.

I am glad to say that my daughter has worked throughout her tenure at UGA to cover most of her non-scholarship expenses, and she will be graduating debt-free with a minimum amount of parental help. Yes, her parents picked up the tuition tab for her last semester … but we knew it was coming and had prepared for it.

I don’t necessarily agree with Lee that the HOPE scholarship should be a tuition reimbursement program. There are too many deserving kids who would never have the opportunity to attend college under those conditions. However, I see no reason why the scholarship can’t be modified to require the student to reimburse the lottery fund if they subsequently lose their scholarship and drop out of school.

Red

December 13th, 2009
4:08 pm

Why don’t you just graduate in 4 years? If you take a full class load each semester (instead of dropping classes midway through – which count towards HOPE credits), HOPE gets you through college tuition free – just as it was designed to do. Sorry it took you 4.5 years at a second rate school to realize that you cannot correctly forecast. Good luck!

sab

December 13th, 2009
4:10 pm

That’s right Amanda! How dare you go above and beyond expectations and expect to continue to receive any support for doing so. Don’t you know lottery officials have bonuses to get? And yes, even though HOPE is funded primarily by those freely playing the lottery and is not an actual “tax”, let’s just call it a tax and I am SO tired of paying for education and police protection and hospitals. I would rather my money go towards something important…like an unnecessary war. How dare you!!!

Roja

December 13th, 2009
4:23 pm

So we should give you the Hope Scholarship to be a “professional student”? Rules, smules, we don’t care ’bout no stinkin’ rules?????

Mattie

December 13th, 2009
4:26 pm

Lee’s idea is terrific, and makes a lot of sense to me. My middle son just finished his first college semester with a 3.4 GPA, but he didn’t qualify for HOPE out of high school.

When we went to orientation, we were actually told to limit our kids to no more than 29 credits the first year. Since HOPE doesn’t reevaluate merit until after 30 credits, a student can go halfway through the sophomore year before risking losing it. By the same token, at this point my son won’t earn any HOPE money until his sophomore year also.

Youngest just received his early admission to UGA. We were not aware that the AP and dual enrollment courses he has taken during high school were going to count against his available credit $$ in the future. I’m glad I checked this blog todday.

ksiujgth

December 13th, 2009
4:40 pm

get a job or get a loan! quit your whinning elitist attitude! maybe if hammonds had had to work her way thru school, she would be emotionaly equipped to handle her “disappointment”!

Barbara

December 13th, 2009
4:45 pm

Excuse my ignorance, but is not the Hope scholarship funded entirely by the Georgia lottery? Which nine times out of ten the users of this scholarship and their family members are not the purchasers of the tickets that fund this program. Ms Harmon success should make her a prime candidate for one of the many scholarships offered by many foundations. Her time would have been better spent looking into this option earlier than complaining later. Life is not fair and there really is no free lunch. I wish her much success in the future.

Gail

December 13th, 2009
4:59 pm

Mattie,
In Georgia the only hours counted against HOPE hours are hours earned at a college in Georgia with HOPE funds. The person who wrote about the AP hours has a child in a North Carolina university.

AP hours in Georgia do not count toward the allowed HOPE credit hours.

DLink

December 13th, 2009
4:59 pm

Let’s just melt this down. “I’m now experienced in marketing and wish to pass my proposal along for my master’s thesis.”

I know of many good people who lost the hope scholarship due to inability in holding a B average… A Lot of them. You get your shot at a higher education and that’s a very good thing for the people who can get there. That said, I know many who really didn’t belong there, or were borderline, but quite bright in their own way. I’ll ask a divergent question and question what happens to the people dropped from the program. Sure, the cream of the crop comes here advertising like a politician. What about the others, surely you know them. Joe plumber, eh?

Starlets fly on their own dime because they’ve earned, or are worth it. What of the 10,000 who didn’t make the Freshman year? Worthy students, perhaps. What of those with no sponsors to continue their education? Because, that’s what this is kind of about, right?

Someone failed to notice that they were about to be dropped for some reason and are now looking for a pillow to land on. Be it high or low, where is that pillow? You can drown in half a teaspoon of water, after all.

Yeah, drama grad.

DLink

December 13th, 2009
5:04 pm

I wrote something and now it’s gone…. Welcome to the internet I suppose, waited too long.

sab

December 13th, 2009
5:20 pm

I wrote something and it still hasn’t posted but when I try to repost it tells me its a duplicate! Where is my post?!

ROBERT LILL

December 13th, 2009
5:31 pm

You knew up front what the rules were, did you not? Obviously you are a bright kid, but you seem to have learned little about the real world. Be glad that someone else paid for 50% of your education already. Greedy, probably not, naïve, yes.

Who decides who is and who is not a “Super Senior”. I know a lot of kids in the 2.5 gpa range that I would hire into my business before some 4.0 students. Just be glad you live in a State that has HOPE.

A 3.0 in HS is not a 3.0 in college. I would say if you want to make some real changes to HOPE base HOPE as follows, 45% on GPA, 45% on SAT/ACT and 10% on leadership/extra curr.

pj

December 13th, 2009
5:33 pm

I have to disagree with PHS; I think MORE of the Hope money should be channeled into the Pre-K program, so that ALL kids in GA can have Pre K IN A SCHOOL, as mine were able to in Clarke Co. I think investing in kids when they are younger, especially “disadvantaged” kids, is a better use of the money. I also think that HOPE has not actually been able to do what it originally set out to. There’s no point in getting into the debate about whether access to resources affects overall performance, and there are cases on both sides, but the funding should be geared toward people who make the grade but couldn’t afford to go to college otherwise. I don’t know how that would be done, but a lot of you seem to think poor people are the ones buying lottery tickets, so those of you who think this should have no problem with funds being distributed as such. To me, there should be a combination of qualifications.

Tom

December 13th, 2009
5:57 pm

For the love of all the is good and just – do not tie HOPE scholarships to grades!

As a professor at a college in the University System, I already endure the pressure from students to award them Bs when they earn Cs. I’ve grown tired of the tears from students saying they won’t have any other way to attend school and the passive-aggressiveness where students try to shift the blame for their lack of success of anyone but themselves; I dislike being so cynical when a student says they need to meet with me after the semester ends.

I understand why people think this is a good idea – if I wasn’t in the system, I might agree with them. The expectation that students take their “free money” and invest it wisely in their education is very reasonable. The problem is that we’ve already seen runaway grade-inflation at the high school level and tying reimbursement to college grades is one sure way to encourage grade-inflation at the college level. No one wants to be accused of costing other people money and yet that’s exactly what will happen with this approach.

Tom

December 13th, 2009
6:00 pm

Let me clarify – I’m talking exclusively about the reimbursement suggestion from above.

Of course students already have to maintain a 3.0 in college to remain eligible for HOPE. This one flat line for all or nothing keeps things simpler for all involved. Reimbursing students based on their GPA will create situations where students expect one set of grades when they’ve really earned another and then they don’t get as much money back as they think they should get.

lou

December 13th, 2009
6:07 pm

It’s nice you’ve had time for those extra activities. I worked my way through undergrad and grad school This was before HOPE. With working there was no time for extras and grades suffered a little but I got through.

motherjanegoose

December 13th, 2009
6:07 pm

@willie, honey our kids cannot qualify for any of the free money because we SAVED our money and did not spend it, thus the government wants us to use our money and give money to the kids whose parents did not save. The same way they want to tax us on the money we are earning to share it with those who are not working…..HUH?

Yes, it may look like we have money ( in our house) but that is because both parents have been working since before the kids were born. We use coupons, drive older cars that are paid for and are not into bling. We do not have the most up to date cell phones, a big screen TV nor even a Wii ( is that spelled correctly?)

HOPE rewards any kid who is willing to keep his/her grades up. To me, this is fair. Our son used it and now our daughter will too. I am grateful for any money the kids can get as the loans they take out will be paid back by them. We can help out some but will not refinance our home to get them through school.

@ Red, what is up with UGA being a second rate school? It is getting more difficult to get in every year.

@ ROBERT….I think Super Senior is not talking about the character of Amanda but that she is now more than a senior as far as length of attendance. …kind of like Senior PLUS.

Dave

December 13th, 2009
6:10 pm

I have relatives in a nearby state who have put three children through college with NO HOPE SCHOLARSHIP. Be grateful for what we have in Georgia.

Sarah

December 13th, 2009
6:34 pm

Like somebody previously said, the HOPE must have limits. I’m a junior in college, and due to a change in major, will have to pay for my last semester of school. I am beyond thankful that HOPE has gotten me this far.

If Amanda has such a stellar academic record, perhaps she should have applied for a merit-based scholarship.

No one is entitled to a college education. It must be worked for as well as paid for.

jconservative

December 13th, 2009
6:42 pm

I agree with Lee.

I worked 4 summers, 14 hours a day, seven days a week for 3 months & paid my way through college.

If HOPE runs out, get a job.

another dual major student

December 13th, 2009
7:00 pm

Just to clear something up, a “super senior”does not refer to someone who has gone above and beyond, it refers to a 5th year senior. Also, graduating in 4 years with two majors is not a matter of budgeting your time correctly. For business majors at UGA, you must first take all your core classes (60 hours, which is 4 semesters) before you can apply for Terry. Only once you’ve been accepted for the major can you begin to take classes for the major. Since graduating with one major is 120 hours, graduating with two majors can easily put students over the 127 hour cap.

And to those saying students now are getting such a great deal, remember that in 1990 tuition and fees at UGA was roughly $2000. It is now over $4600, with only around $3000 a semester being covered by HOPE. Factor in the increase in textbook costs (roughly $400-$500 per semester and increasing on average at twice the cost of inflation) and the cost is relatively the same as pre-HOPE (and yes, that factors in inflation). Don’t get me wrong, I love HOPE and am thankful for it (especially given that I have 2 other siblings currently in college), but people sure do think that this generation has it so much easier than they did.

For those that love sources: Tuition increases: http://www.uga.edu/oir/reports/sugtuitcomp9106.pdf
Textbook increases: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-806

BlondeHoney

December 13th, 2009
7:05 pm

I agree with the poster who said HOPE funds should be available to older students returning to school to deal with the adverse job market and economic conditions. I have taken out student loans to pay for the continuation of my education and remain marketable but I’m not whining about it. My son graduated in May with a chemical engineering degree from FSU on a Florida Bright Futures scholarship (Florida Scholar, the highest scholarship awarded) and even HE had to take out student loans to cover the shortfall. Like the others, I congratulate Ms. Hammonds on her achievments but she needs to be grateful for what she gootem throiugh HOPE.

another dual major student

December 13th, 2009
7:11 pm

oops, meant to add that the $4600 figure is as of 2005-2006. That was before the last two $100/semester fee increases from the board of regents.

Thank God for the HOPE

December 13th, 2009
7:32 pm

Dear Amanda,

I have to concur with the others that have pointed out that the rules of the HOPE are well known to students, especially ones as bright as you appear to be.

I am the parent of 2 HOPE recipients, both at Ga Tech, and I thank God every day for the help they have received. One graduated early and working on a PHD and one who is a Junior. Both were very aware of the limitations of the HOPE and kept to the guidelines to ensure graduating on time. In this day and age to really is more important to get an advanced degree in my opinion. Perhaps your dual degree may be just as important. If I have to assist them in paying for their Masters that is fine by me. I feel blessed to have had the benefit of their under graduate degrees paid mostly by the Hope.

I also would like to point out to Philosopher that the HOPE is funded by the lottery proceeds, not the taxpayers.

another dual major student

December 13th, 2009
7:34 pm

comment didn’t post first time, let me try this again.

The term “Super Senior” refers to a 5th year senior, not someone who has gone above and beyond. Also, budgeting of time is not the reason most people with dual majors go over the “limit” and don’t graduate in 4 years. To graduate with one major, 120 hours are required and only some of those can satisfy both majors (mainly the first 60 hours of core classes and a few of the non-major required electives). Simply put, usually the extra year is necessary for the extra major.

And to the people who think that students have it so much cheaper today, remember that tuition and fees at UGA in 1990 was $2000. In 2005 it was $4600, with only $3500 being covered by HOPE. Since then, an additional $200 per semester fee has been added in the past year by the board of regents. At the same time, textbook costs have increased at twice that of inflation. Textbooks are now around $400-$500 per semester. When you adjust for inflation, students on HOPE are still paying nearly the same as those 20 years ago. Don’t get me wrong, I love HOPE and am thankful for it (especially with two other siblings in college), but it’s not like we’re going to school for free.

Sources: Tuition increases- http://www.uga.edu/oir/reports/sugtuitcomp9106.pdf
Textbook increases- http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-806

Get a job!

December 13th, 2009
7:39 pm

You can’t stay in college forever, you need to become a productive member of society!

It’s kind of sad to cry about not getting $11 when you were given $10.

catlady

December 13th, 2009
7:48 pm

Ms. Hammond: you made the choices you did. Surely you, as a super senior, can live with the results of your voluntary choices. Best wishes for a successful career. And, should you be confused, HOPE does not pay for grad school, either. Reap the benefit of your hard work, and be glad of the opportunity you have had–one that in many other states would not have been afforded to you.

oldtimer

December 13th, 2009
7:59 pm

Here in my adopted, state community colleges offer FREE classes to any HS grad. Many of my students take some of the basics there and some in summer, even above joint enrollment, and they do not count toward HOPE hours.
My youngest had a five year major at a GA college and HOPE payed for it. We were told upfront her payments would be different due to the major and required internship…which they only counted as one hour, even though it was six months full time. This kept the HOPE stuff straight, but messed up insurance for a year.

catlady

December 13th, 2009
8:10 pm

P.S. My younger daughter graduated from a $34000 per year private college here in Georgia in 8 semesters with dual degrees in astrophysics and math, 3.4 GPA. As you are probably aware, Hope pays only a pittance of that cost (as is right), being a private college. So, ya’ know, I really don’t want to hear the super senior schtick. (A super senior does it in 4 years) Better drop the entitlement ‘tude before you make a negative impression on employers!

Cry Baby

December 13th, 2009
8:11 pm

I’ve made a note, Ms. Amanda Hammons, to ensure you are never hired at my company. You are a college student crying because you chose to take on extra degrees. HOPE is already running out of money without paying for students like you who can’t decide what they want to do with their lives. If you had planned ahead (something that is a must if you hope to ever hold a job long term!) you would have known 4.5 years ago that you would be unable to have HOPE pay for another semester once you had exceeded 127 hours.

Now, think about this: a dual degree could potentially require as few as 135 hours (should you not waste away electives). If you really are as smart as you claim to be, you could have ended your 8th semester at 115 hours, allowing a full additonal semester (12 hours) to be paid by HOPE. During that semester, you could instead take 20 hours and graduate.

catlady

December 13th, 2009
8:20 pm

Oh, yeah, and back in the day (1970) there was very little financial aid. NSF grants were gearing up. Graduating second in my high school class of 250, I got a 100$ “award”. There were also no AP classes then, athough you could try to CLEP out. I graduated with a 3.8 in 3 years by taking massive overloads (6, 7, or 8 classes per term).

To quote Monty Python: And you tell kids of today that, and they won’t believe you.

To quote Brother Dave Gardner: Gratitude is riches and complaint is poverty.

Yawn...

December 13th, 2009
8:25 pm

…and you walked to school uphill both ways in the driving snow while carrying your little brother on your back. We got it.

BlondeHoney

December 13th, 2009
8:26 pm

Amen, catlady

notimpressed

December 13th, 2009
8:48 pm

The state of Georgia offered to foot your bill for *one* degree, not for two and not for your extracurriculars. I worked my way through three degrees, with a little help from student loans *which I must repay*, all while the overindulged, socially-promoted Georgia HOPE “scholars” get a free ride. I guarantee that few of these kids are actually in need of the help. If their parents quit wasting money on their kids’ SUVs, cell phone bills, etc. etc. etc., then they might be able to cough up a couple of thousand bucks twice a year. Plus, more of the REALLY deserving kids who desperately need this money to attend college would be able to! PRIORITIES, PEOPLE!!! It won’t kill Johnny and Susie to find a summer job or wait tables 20 hours a week!

catlady

December 13th, 2009
8:53 pm

Nope. I was an only child and born in FL My mom was a teacher and my dad a rocket scientist (really). His missile was finally used in the Persian Gulf War. I was richly blessed by having two college grad parents BS in psych and soc, minor in Latin , and BSEE from Duke (in 3 years!) from the early/mid 1940s.

UGAStudent

December 13th, 2009
9:09 pm

As a current senior at the University of Georgia I find it interesting that Ms. Hammons considers herself a “Super Senior”. Being involved and a double major by no means makes you a “Super Senior”. Many students at UGA and many other colleges throughout Georgia are involved on their campus and double majoring and still manage to graduate with four years. Last summer I changed my major giving me only one year to complete all my classes needed and still graduate on time, and yet I still will graduate in May just as I am supposed to. You made a decision to get involved and to double major and you should have made sure that you took the summer courses and took extra hours to graduate on time. It is possible, which is evident by the thousands of students who do it every year. The HOPE Scholarship is a great thing, and you should just be thankful that you had it for as long as you did. Many students aren’t even that lucky. Students forget that we aren’t entitled to HOPE. It takes a lot of hard work to keep, and having it for four years should be enough. By wanting more, because YOU see yourself as a “super senior” is just greedy. Quit complaining.

Darrin "The Vent King"

December 13th, 2009
9:57 pm

I feel for this person and actually agree there should (in a perfect world) be something that could be done, BUT there is only so much Hope money. To give her extra would take away from others. The problem isn’t actually the distribution of the money, but the production of it. I.too, take advantage HOPE and it clearly lays out what it is you can and can NOT do frm the beginning. When I was on HOPE grant, I knew in the beginning it would only pay for a certificate and if I wanted to pursue my AA back then, that I would have to foot the bill for the few remaining classes so I prepared myself back then for that and paid for the other classes I needed in a different way until it was time to apply for the HOPE scholarship that I knew I had a high enough GPA to obtain. Someone of her intelligence should already know that. Plus there are other scholarships that someone with your GPA and accomplishments should have no problem qualifying for IMO. When in college you must leave all options open and consider alternative ways to take care of these issuea as you will have to do in real life. HOPE is not a bottomless well of funds and can not award more than it has to take care of the overachievers AND those who otherwise would not have the fair opportunity to achieve in the first place. Matter of fact, we’re lucky to have such a thing and will be even luckier if its still around years from now.

Darrin "The Vent King"

December 13th, 2009
10:06 pm

There is only so much HOPE money. To give you more would mean to give others who are underprivileged less- can’t have it both ways. I too been receiving HOPE funds for years and it clearly lays out from the beginning what you can and can NOT do. Besides with your GPA and accomplishments you should have no problem receiving a scholarship by other means. Just as in real life, you have to be proactive in finding a way when faced with a challenge like you have during your illustrious collegiate career. The original idea with HOPE was to give those with less opportunity “hope” that they will be able to get one with a chance they otherwise may not get, NOT to pay for multiple degrees for overachievers. I applaud your efforts in school, but what you’re asking isn’t fair to others who need “hope” too.

CC

December 13th, 2009
10:24 pm

While your accomplishments are admirable- I must comment that for such a smart young person, you forgot to read the rules. You are a good student, very involved, and apparently many connections. Therefore, you must be aware of grants, scholarships, and as always- student loans. Stop whining- it is mature, nor worthy of your accomplishments thus far.

CC

December 13th, 2009
10:24 pm

CorrectionL It isn’t mature…

Free Market Educator

December 13th, 2009
10:25 pm

WHAAAAAAAAAA! Ms. Hammons your whine isn’t quite loud enough. You need to take “gimme” lessons from the PROFESSIONALS at Berkeley U. …..

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/12/13/torch-wielding-leftists-at-uc-berkeley-attack-chancellors-home/

Techie

December 13th, 2009
10:26 pm

“Super senior” relates to those who spend over four years on their undergrad; it has nothing to do what you did. At Tech, it’s not uncommon to be a super senior, especially for the hardcore engineers. However, most go to Tech with the understanding that if you stay over four years, be prepared to take out a loan. While HOPE is nice (I’m grateful for it), I understand that to make something of myself, some sacrifices have to be made and taking out a loan is one of them. If this character is as bad-a as she’s says she is, she should have no problem paying back her loans with the money she will make after she graduates. She could be in another state with tens of thousands of dollars of debt. It’s called looking at the bigger picture.

educator

December 13th, 2009
10:48 pm

great observation..”a great society is an educated society” Our legislators would rather spend BILLIONS bailing out greedy mismanaged corporations then putting a little extra in the public education of our youth….

educator

December 13th, 2009
10:56 pm

who are these mean spirited bloggers???? An over achieving student wonders if it could be possible to further INCENTIVIZE the education process….all I hear from these BLOG WHINERS is closed minded personal attacks on someone who genuinely cares about the possibillites of greater education opportunities….oh an by the way this is a lotto funded program..not your tax dollars …so quit the complaining about not enough money in our budget….

educator

December 13th, 2009
11:02 pm

cat lady and free market educator are the reason ideas die prior to incubation….Why change things….why improve and expand the opportunity to educate our youth…In EUROPE college is FREE!!!!!….THE U.S. ranks 15th in the world in education…and yes all European and asian countries rank ahead of us….Get off your “I walked 10 miles to school in the snow” sob story and be thankful we have cars and mass transit….oh and read a book by someone in this millenium…..

educator

December 13th, 2009
11:10 pm

To J conservative ……you obviously miss the point…….its not about a handout …its about offering education to achievers…..Had you been either an academic or athletic over achiver you could have had your education paid for even in the 60’s….truth is, you barely got by then and you are still struggling today…..If you had learned anything from your toturous life it would have been that working hard is one thing..but working SMART and hard is the difference maker….I wouldnt be surprised if this kid did work and go to school…

Sally

December 13th, 2009
11:18 pm

Talk about looking a gift horse in the mouth!! I’m glad we have the Hope Scholarship in Georgia. Glad that so many have been able to benefit from it. I hope it will continue for years to come. But, this is the problem when someone is given something. Somehow it becomes something that is due to them and more often then not, they feel they are due even more. To the author of this piece, congratulations on your accomplishments. Life is tough. Get a job and pay for your final semester. It will do you a world of good.

Echo

December 13th, 2009
11:29 pm

My undergrad degree is from out of state (I’m from the midwest), there was no program like HOPE. Got through in 4.5 years with 149 undergrad & 3 graduate credit hours. I was in the military before going to college and that paid for SOME of my education & had a partial athletic scholarship. I attended grad school at UGA…no HOPE & I paid out of state tuition. Even though I graduated almost 15 years ago, I still pay student loans to the tune of almost $350 a month. Be glad that you got HOPE funds!

BTW: lottery proceeds fund HOPE not taxpayer funds…however taxpayers do subsidize a portion of the costs. And those lazy/stupid folks need to pay back the HOPE money if they dont graduate.

HB

December 13th, 2009
11:36 pm

I attended a private school in GA with my tuition paid by a variety of merit scholarships, including HOPE (like catlady said, though, HOPE was merely a drop in the bucket). I double majored and easily graduated in 4 years. If that had not been possible, my second major would have been my minor, as there was no way I was going to pay $15,000 for the extra semester because 1) I didn’t have it as all the scholarships were limited to 4 years and 2) it wasn’t worth the money! Most people I knew in college double majored or at least accompished two divergent lines of coursework, such as completing a long list of prereq courses for med school while also completing a B.A. core and humanities major. We were all involved in extracurriculars, put our hearts into leadership roles, completed internships, and had high GPAs. But we recognized we had timelines, financial limitations, and higher degrees we wanted to get started on and be able to pay for, so we adjusted our student careers accordingly. But you think you should be entitled to extra money just because you chose a longer path to graduation? Please don’t act like you’re being punished for being too ambitious. That’s just obnoxious, and frankly, the resume you listed really isn’t that impressive.

Honestly, when you go to apply for jobs, lacking the second major might not have mattered much if you could make the case that you were still qualified through coursework on your transcript. You may have been just as well off to have the marketing major, complete an internship, and come up a little short of completing the sport management major, but still with a long list of classes you could show that you completed with good grades in preparation for that career. But you weighed your options and felt it was worth the extra money to have the second major listed on your diploma. That’s fine — it’s your decision, and if you are correct that it really matters for your employment options, then one semester’s tuition at a public university is really a small price to pay. The state got you through 4 years leaving you to pay roughly 11% of 4.5 years’ tuition. Sounds like a bargain to me.

educator

December 13th, 2009
11:45 pm

I think Catlady is living on the successes of her parents and daughter…No doubt her husband keeps her well fed and read while she blogs endlessly w/meaningless dribble about her incredible family…I think she would just as soon take away the HOPE rather than improve or expand it….I think this lady doth protest too much….the veil has been lifted on her IQ….People who offer criticism over solution are usually living off the work of others. I am sue this contributes greatly to her cynnical outlook on aspiring youth.

educator

December 13th, 2009
11:48 pm

Oh and anyone who uses the name of an animal to blog is definitely not on my Christmas list.

educator

December 13th, 2009
11:54 pm

Sally…they werent given it…they earned it..and why not EXPLORE the possibilities of allowing all achievers an opportunity to earn more education…why not expand what is a great program ..paid for by the LOTTERY!!!! not you

Jody

December 13th, 2009
11:54 pm

Actually, unless the program has changed recently, there are some additional limits beyond the 127 hour requirement. I changed schools midway through college and lost my HOPE award because I did not do as well as hoped at the first college (should have gone to engineering school instead of liberal arts college in the first place). Fast forward a year and even though I had a 3.75 GPA, I could not get the HOPE award reinstated because at my 90th attempted hour (I dropped one whole class after the drop/add period), I only had a 2.9 GPA. There was no warning for this, just a rude awakening when I started doing research with the financial aid office. In the end, I learned an expensive lesson and am still paying for my education because I did not drum up enough additional scholarship support. My parents were unable to completely support me and I was unable to drum up enough additional scholarship support to offset the lost of the HOPE scholarship. For the record, this wasn’t for lack of trying, but for a naive lack of understanding. And yes, I worked my entire way through college. Sometimes that’s the way the cookie crumbles.

GT grad but back in school

December 14th, 2009
12:18 am

I would like to point out that at Georgia Tech, many of the degrees REQUIRE quite a bit more than 120 credit hours. Anywhere from 132 to 138 is standard, especially for the engineering degrees. Now, if you take 18 credit hours every semester, and if you load all your extras into your final semester, and if your degree only requires 132 hours, then MAYBE you can get HOPE to pay for your entire degree. Except it’s very difficult to create a schedule with 18 credit hours that (1) doesn’t have any overlapping classes or labs and (2) will not destroy your mental sanity. So can we please stop discussing how 127 hours has “extra hours” built in or is more than enough to get a degree in 4 years?

Also, an internship in college is basically a requirement for a job these days, and most companies will NOT offer an internship unless you are a student who will be returning to school after the internship (or can accept college credit for the internship). Thus, the emphasis she placed on staying for her internship was quite correct, IMO. I made the mistake of deciding against a full internship or co-op while I was in school, deciding instead to focus on graduating in the standard 4 years. I didn’t think (or realize) how necessary one of those 2 experiences would later be. I thought that with my extracurricular involvement I would have more than enough experience to pull on when applying for jobs. I went 11 straight semesters (fall, spring, summer every year). When I graduated in 2008, I had trouble finding a job. Every company I talked to told me I didn’t have enough experience (d’oh). A few months later, the economy tanked. I am now back in school for a related 2 year technical degree, and a major reason for that decision is the ability to say “I am a student” when applying for internships and jobs.

However, I will say that her tone in the piece is very whiney. What exactly does she think Tech students have been dealing with since the implementation of the HOPE scholarship limits? And for which school does she think the “spring checkpoint” was made? (It is uncommon for a first year to end their spring semester with 30 credits; many end with 27 and less than a 3.0 GPA . That’s a LOT of students who were getting an extra semester off HOPE that otherwise would have lost it.)

This issue isn’t new, nor has it been considered newsworthy (until now). Suck it up. We Techies all do. Be thankful for the portion payed by HOPE, and look at the rest as a necessary investment in your future career.

Art

December 14th, 2009
12:42 am

Educator is missing the point. The Hope is a limited fund and is used by students across the state. Amanda could have and should have appropriated loans, applied for scholarships, or worked to help pay for school. She is not a lazy student, but she understood the rules when she accepted Hope. I don’t know if educator has googled anything about the university systems in Europe, but here’s a link he should review. It reveals a poor system with many problems, but it is not free. The link is three and a half years old, but I would say it is still relevant today. There were several articles like this on page one of my google search. http://publicuniversities.ssrc.org/commentaries/european_universities/

John Doe

December 14th, 2009
2:38 am

I graduated high school in 2002 and qualified for the hope scholarship, I however at the time decided I should join the Army instead of going to college unprepared. I then enrolled and started school this past fall. I did receive the GI Bill however I found out that I no longer qualified for the hope due to a change in the rules in 2007, even though I had a certificate for earning the Hope. It bothers me that when the law was changed there was no exception made for people who had served in the military. Just throwing that out there, While I was jumping out of planes at Ft. Bragg or deployed in Iraq the state government did not look out for me.

GA Alumni

December 14th, 2009
4:37 am

Funny, the baby boomers get hit with a recession and they throw out the American Dream. Historian and writer James Truslow Adams coined the phrase “American Dream” in his 1931 book Epic of America: “The American Dream is that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for every man, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement.”

I guess we can throw that idea out.

ScienceTeacher671

December 14th, 2009
5:58 am

educator, in Europe, most countries don’t expect (or educate) all students to go to college.

Author

December 14th, 2009
7:42 am

I’d like to clarify any misunderstandings that have developed:

The main point is being completely misinterpreted. The reason I wrote the article was NOT to complain. I am completely grateful for my four years of paid tuition. The point of the article is to suggest an Amendment for the existing Scholarship guidelines, similar to the Academic Excellence Grant provided by most high schools in GA. The Amendment would be to grant an appeal process for students completing a degree that have exceeded their allotted HOPE hours, contingent on maintaining a 3.5 GPA. Yes, I knew the rules when I enrolled in college, but I did not know how my college career would develop. I don’t expect to be an exception to the rules, I’m suggesting an appeals process for students who have earned an extension to complete their attempted degree. This is not to encourage “professional students” because ideally the educated students would then move on to begin working and, as always, the appeal would still be at the discretion of the HOPE Scholarship committee.

For those of you who claim I could have worked or “forecasted” better… I ask you to re-think your cynicism. I have worked several jobs tirelessly throughout college to support myself. Achieving two degrees required 4 ½ years and could not have been achieved in 4. I have never taken an elective that was not required and never had a summer off from school or work. My internship was required to graduate from the Marketing department, so no, I could not have pursued post-graduate internship opportunities. Again, I am not complaining about the level of intensity or sacrifice involved on my journey, just trying to communicate that I did approach my decisions with advisement and clarity. I’m excited to enter the job market, as my education has fully prepared me to do so and I will begin my contribution to society without hesitation.

With regards to my achievements meriting some other scholarship funding, you are right. I received the Soule Scholarship in the Spring which funded my Summer Internship credit over the summer. I searched far and wide for scholarships awarded in the Fall, but all of the scholarships that I could apply for were awarded the semester after I would graduate. I also have accumulated significant debt through student loans that I’ll begin paying just like the rest of the December graduates.

Accusations of greed and entitlement are simply ridiculous. My goal for this letter was to fill a perceived hole in the education system, not to re-coup a few thousand dollars. And filling this perceived hole would not come out of the tax payers pockets, as HOPE is funded by the GA State Lottery. I realize limits and moderation are critical to successful implementations of any program, but the HOPE was founded to give students the chance to learn for free. This is merely an extension of that principle.

Hopefully I’ve cleared some things up so that you will understand this letter was to propose opportunities for future students, not to protest my own personal experience.

Author

December 14th, 2009
7:49 am

I’d like to clarify any misunderstandings that have developed:

The main point is being completely misinterpreted. The reason I wrote the article was NOT to complain. I am completely grateful for my four years of paid tuition. The point of the article is to suggest an Amendment for the existing Scholarship guidelines, similar to the Academic Excellence Grant provided by most high schools in GA. The Amendment would be to grant an appeal process for students completing a degree that have exceeded their allotted HOPE hours, contingent on maintaining a 3.5 GPA. Yes, I knew the rules when I enrolled in college, but I did not know how my college career would develop. I don’t expect to be an exception to the rules, I’m suggesting an appeals process for students who have earned an extension to complete their attempted degree. This is not to encourage “professional students” because ideally the educated students would then move on to begin working and, as always, the appeal would still be at the discretion of the HOPE Scholarship committee.

For those of you who claim I could have worked or “forecasted” better… I ask you to re-think your cynicism. I have worked several jobs tirelessly throughout college to support myself. Achieving two degrees required 4 ½ years and could not have been achieved in 4. I have never taken an elective that was not required and never had a summer off from school or work. My internship was required to graduate from the Marketing department, so no, I could not have pursued post-graduate internship opportunities. Again, I am not complaining about the level of intensity or sacrifice involved on my journey, just trying to communicate that I did approach my decisions with advisement and clarity.

With regards to my achievements meriting some other scholarship funding, you are right. I received the Soule Scholarship in the Spring which funded my Summer Internship credit over the summer. I searched far and wide for scholarships awarded in the Fall, but all of the scholarships that I could apply for were awarded the semester after I would graduate. I also have accumulated significant debt through student loans that I’ll begin paying just like the rest of the December graduates.

Accusations of greed and entitlement are simply ridiculous. My goal for this letter was to fill a perceived hole in the education system, not to re-coup a few thousand dollars. And filling this perceived hole would not come out of the tax payers pockets, as HOPE is funded by the GA State Lottery. I realize limits and moderation are critical to successful implementations of any program, but the HOPE was founded to give students the chance to learn for free. This is merely an extension of that principle.

Hopefully I’ve cleared some things up so that you will understand this letter was to propose opportunities for future students, not to protest my own personal experience.

Mitch Copeland

December 14th, 2009
8:05 am

The real disconnect is betweeen the financial aid “satisfactory progress” mechanism and the fact that at most schools the tuition stops going up after you reach a minimum full load. We used to be able to encourage good students to learm more by taking non-required courses above the required ones, thus broadening their education and instilling a sense of intellectual curiosity that benefitted them and society as a whole.

Now we have a generation of students who view college as a hurdle to overcome and think they’ve made a horrible error if they ever took a course that doesn’t directly contribute to their degree program. What a waste.

v racer

December 14th, 2009
8:13 am

Handle each case on merit. Some deserve the extra time and others don’t.

RMH

December 14th, 2009
8:37 am

Wow! Almost everyone is suffering from the bad economy and we have a student who wants us to pay for her college as long as she goes. I understand that she wants more education and is not really wasting the money, but there has to be a limit. Look for other ways to pay for your education.

Philosopher

December 14th, 2009
8:38 am

The meanness in the hearts of so many humans is appalling! Disagree with the young lady if you like, but, WHOA! is the nastiness required? Would you want another adult talking to your college student daughter this way? Really! Express your disagreement with some compassion, could you?!

UGA'65,'67

December 14th, 2009
9:03 am

The prevailing sentiment in response to “Hope Extension” supports the concept of fairness and equitable distribution of resources. The author of this opinion piece, although self described as a highly successful student, seems to more more consumed with her narrow (selfish?) view of the HOPE program: “What more is in it for me”, suggesting a disappointing “entitlement” mentality that we see too often in our culture. Perhaps, after the author has digested the remarks published here, she will rethink her place in a society that has to make tough choices about resources. Otherwise, it would be disappointing for such a seemingly bright person to miss such a critical point.

UGA'65,'67

December 14th, 2009
9:04 am

Enter your comments here

sees the future

December 14th, 2009
9:22 am

This is an excellent example of why even modest entitlement programs get out of hand–the original gift is never enough and people quickly move from being grateful for the help to being angry that it’s not enough.

My family came here from Pennsylvania where the in state tuition at Penn State is $20,000 per year–that’s tuition, not room and board. Even without HOPE, Georgia’s tuition is a bargain. You got a great deal–say thank you and take out a student loan for the last semester.

Warrior Woman

December 14th, 2009
10:14 am

@ educator – Someone needs to call BS on your personal attacks on those who say Amanda should follow the rules. You have no way of knowing if J conservative could have received financial aid in the 60s or is an over-, under-, or average achiever. Even in the 80s, many academic overachievers did not receive adequate non-loan financial aid because they didn’t fit in the right diversity pigeonhole, received poor advice on applying for aid from their guidance counselor, had middle class parents who made “too much money” to qualify for need-based aid but not enough to pay for their student’s education, or a myriad of other reasons. Those of us who are motivated overachievers did what we had to do to pay our own way.

And to those who say (accurately) that HOPE is funded by the lottery, not taxes, remember first, many call the lottery a tax on stupidity and second, although the lottery funds HOPE there is significant tax dollar investment in higher education, both at the state and federal level.

HB

December 14th, 2009
10:25 am

Amanda, I think the reason people have trouble seeing the value of your proposal is that your arguments for it were all about you and your wants. You talked about the extra free semester you seem to feel you’ve earned and how it will benefit you. You didn’t really make a good case for the value of investing in our students having dual degrees or double majors. Not everyone will agree that two is better than one, especially when you could have moved on to a higher degree program rather than working on an extra bachelor’s.

When you look at a government run program, it’s important to try to determine what value that program will add to our state. Many people agree that Georgia benefits from giving more students an opportunity to extend their education beyond high school and providing an incentive to our very best students to stay in state. But will Georgia be better off if more students have dual bachelor’s? Or if the money were available, would it be better to help fund master’s programs? Or more vocational ed? Or programs to retrain older workers? I have heard good arguments for extending HOPE for bachelor programs that by design require more credits, like many majors at Tech, to avoid discouraging students from enrolling in those programs and help Georgia to maintain a strong pool of applicants for jobs in those fields. That argument is not about rewarding those students, but rather about building our workforce. The students in return, would receive full tuition for one bachelor’s degree just like every other student on HOPE.

So why should we invest more in you? Because of a 3.5 GPA? Because of your club involvement? How would having more students with both marketing and sport management bachelor’s degrees benefit Georgia more than having just marketing majors? You haven’t sold most of us here on your proposal — put those marketing skills to work and try again.

educator

December 14th, 2009
1:27 pm

@ warrior woman…..I say BS to those of you awho are personally attacking an estute observatin of the limitations of a scholarship program….and again …anyone who blogs with a militant title like warrior is not on my christmas list.

educator

December 14th, 2009
1:39 pm

warrior woman and J conservative ..i nominate you for a my life is harder than yours award…as Philosopher correctly states….why wish hard times on others just because you had hard times.

Author

December 14th, 2009
5:01 pm

HB – The arguments actually were written for a general student population. I never said “I deserve” or “I earned”. The reason the article stems from my point of view and my own experiences is because I can’t speak for any other students, I can only attest to understanding hard work and academic dedication on behalf of the masses. The extra free semester will have no effect on me whatsoever. I’m graduating in 4 days. Once again, I cannot emphasize enough that this article is not about me. It is merely written from my perspective. None of this would benefit me, I’ve paid my tuition costs already. I’m writing this in the hopes that it gets in the right hands of someone who can develop an abstract solution into a strategic objective. Like I said earlier, I simply perceived a flaw in the system and decided to formulate a solution. The case I am making is not (NOT) specific to someone pursuing a dual-degree. It merely appeals an already established principle to complete the education of those who want it bad enough that they show it through quantifiable measures (grades).

We have no fundamental right to education, but we do have the right to liberty, which is the freedom for free men to pursue happiness (a career/job), and we do have the right to property, which is anything outside a person that adds value. A college (and/or athletic) scholarship can be categorized as liberty and property.

You know as well as I do that no one can be the judge of what type of education is “better for the State.” Deciding to include Graduate School and Masters Programs extends outside the realm of my focus. I’m talking specifically about an Undergraduate semester-specific Scholarship extension for those who have achieved academic excellence. It is important to build the workforce, but who’s to say that some of the brightest individuals that may be limited in their opportunities because the business world tends to forget about the limits placed on educational funding, won’t be able to enter the work force. One GT student mentioned that it is nearly impossible to qualify for a desirable job without an internship or some relevant experience. This mandate for Undergraduate programs to satisfy an internship is not covered in the HOPE allotment of hours. So in regards to the work force, I’d say it’s more important that students finish what they started and be even better qualified once they are through.

You are not investing in me. I will actually be investing in the students. But if you choose to see me as a representation for the students, then you should invest in me because the students are the future. Plain and simple. A 3.5 GPA was not decided by me as Honors status, it was decided by the State and it is currently the only quantitative cut-off available with respect to academic performance. Club involvement was a passion of mine and was added to the story so readers would understand a little more about me. Forget the club. Focus on the issue of educating the masses who will change the world one day. That extra semester spent in college, maybe to complete an Internship or the last few hours of the major, may result in a miraculous break-through. It’s not about having more of my degree, it’s about having a more educated population that can one day lead this great country of ours.

Ben

December 14th, 2009
5:02 pm

Ms. Hammons,

I don’t think you could have picked two less marketable degrees. Why should the lottery subsidize your last semester because you weren’t satisfied with 1 wothless degree? I mean seriously…marketing? Sports Management? Perhaps your pleas for financial assistance would have been better received if you had chosen a degree that you can use and will actually benefit society, such as a doctor or engineer.

Author

December 14th, 2009
5:13 pm

Somehow the “entitlement” word got picked up and tossed around. It’s not even the right word if you check out the definition. So please, have some respect for all the students that are working their butts off to make you look good one day and please stop thinking every proud moment or success story results in an plethora of expectations. I suggest you take a walk around any given campus in the nation at ANY time of the day or night, especially during finals, and you will see how hard students work to rise to your standards… only to be seen as ungrateful entitled kids? I sure hope not.

And HOPE is not a gift… it is achieved by earning a 3.0 GPA. An exchange of merit (very similar to the one I proposed…)

educator

December 14th, 2009
5:25 pm

Ben – a degree is only as valuable as you choose to make it. I can see yours has been put to good use.

HB

December 14th, 2009
5:54 pm

Amanda, I’m sorry if I misunderstood your listing of accomplishments as an example of the type of student deserving or earning a chance for another semester. I thought that was the point you were trying to make, and if it’s not, I have no idea what your argument is for granting extensions to students like yourself.

“You know as well as I do that no one can be the judge of what type of education is “better for the State.””

I’m not sure “judge” is the word I would use, but of course, policy makers decide these things all the time. And “the students are our future” is not a compelling argument. Which students? What makes this group of students more important to fund than others, be they grad students, vocational students, or preschoolers? If you think funding that 9th semester is more likely to bring a miraculous breakthrough than other programs, then say why and back it up with data. How many students need that extra semester? How has a dual degree impacted previous grads? How much more should HOPE cover? You mention no limits on credit hours — should it go on forever as long as you stay at the undergraduate level and have a 3.5? How much would that cost? You clearly feel strongly about this, so I’m encouraging you to dig deeper and make your case! You have a board full of people here (including other super seniors) who think your argument that primarily lists your accomplishments sounds like you feel entitled to/deserving of more free education. That’s not what you wished to convey, but that’s the reaction of readers, so you should probably rethink your presentation and argument. You’re trying to convince people to support this, right?

Author

December 14th, 2009
6:28 pm

I apologize to the reader base for miscommunicating the message. My list of accomplishments was simply to give you a general idea of who I am based on my career developments that have begun to define my character. There’s no type particular type of student I am addressing, and I hope that becomes clear. It would be up to the HOPE Scholarship Committee to address the appeals made by each student. The only qualification I suggested was the cut-off of Honors students. Some great students and bright minds may not have a 3.5 GPA, but that is the hierarchical cut-off established by the education system.

I’ll leave it up to the policy holders to make those kinds of decisions.

The data you are asking for is beyond my research and I’m not even sure that kind of data exists until tested. IMO, the HOPE should go on as long as they are granted an appeal by the committee.

I don’t know what more I can do to explain myself, but I’ll continue to try. After receiving feedback from my peers, it is apparent that the message communicates more effectively to the student demographic. After graduation I’ll consider devoting time to the argument and try to position it better for readers that are more removed from the college environment.

Georgia Teacher

December 14th, 2009
9:17 pm

Ms. Hammons,

Please forgive my bluntness, but your request requires more than a little bluntness.

1) Super seniors, yourself included, should not recieve an extension in HOPE. HOPE is a finite resource and you have recieved your share. Step aside and let someone else have a shot. To ask for more, regardless of the reason and no matter how just you think it is, is greedy.

2) I appreciate your dedication. I truly do. Your situation is not unique. In fact, I am sure there are scholarships for just such a situation. Find them and apply for them. Otherwise, take out a loan against you future income. You can write student loan interest off on your taxes and it is good for your credit.

3) Good luck in your career. I am not sure what real benefit a marketing/ sports management degree is going to be in the long run, but good luck.

4) There is no “injustice” in the HOPE system. You recieve college tuition, etc. for 127 credit hours provided you make the grade. Period. You are asking for the rules to because you made choices and do not want to deal with consequences.

5) Please understand many of us have a problem with your specifics in this case. It is not personal nor is it an attack. We are stating our opinions on the matter. Personally, I feel you have made some choices and, unfortunately for you, those choices are going to require you to sacrifice. That is what life is all about and it is high time you learned it.

Please forgive me for tossing a quote to sum up my opinion on this:
“Who ever said life is fair? Where is that written? Life isn’t always fair.”

HB

December 14th, 2009
9:25 pm

“I’ll leave it up to the policy holders to make those kinds of decisions.”

Noooooooooooooo! :)

Amanda, you’re a bright young woman living in a democratic society — use your talents to petition the policy makers. Do that research. Some of those numbers won’t be as hard to at least estimate as you might think, and if you get a state representative interested, they may even be able to get that data from the House Research Office. Most importantly, keep an open mind. As you learn more and find yourself looking at it from a nonstudent point of view, you may come to think that neither your current proposal or the system that’s in place are satisfactory and you might find yourself working yet another solution or even aiming for a different goal. Good luck!

DB

December 15th, 2009
12:45 am

@educator: “I say BS to those of you awho are personally attacking an estute observatin of the limitations of a scholarship program”

Please, please, please tell me you aren’t teaching spelling. “awho” apparently is a sloppy “who,” “estute” should be “astute,” “observatin” is apparently a typo of “observation.” Sorry, but three mistakes in one sentence is a bit much for anyone calling themselves “educator” (no capital E?). Whatever argument you were making, it flew right out the window in the face of such breathless sloppiness.

DB

December 15th, 2009
1:02 am

Amanda, the biggest problem you have here is that the vast majority of the blog participants simply do not agree with your position. No matter how many times you re-state it, it speaks to a fundamental issue that most Get Schoolers feel strongly about — equitable distribution of limited resources. We understand your argument, but understanding it and being swayed by it are two very different things. It’s not a reflection on your persuasive skills that we disagree with you.

I will point out that using yourself as an example almost always puts your argument at a disadvantage, because people automatically assume that your argument is biased in favor of your situation. If you had written about the challenges faced by perhaps three or four other “super seniors,” your position may have been considered with considerably less cynicism. The result may have been the same, but you wouldn’t have been in the position of defending your own choices to a bunch of strangers :-)

My daughter is a freshman at UGA this year, and we already know that, if she stays with her planned course of study, she will be interning her 9th semester as part of a six-month internship necessary to qualify for her degree. This is just the way it is, and it isn’t a matter of not choosing the appropriate course, or whatever. The curriculum for her major is very clearly spelled out for each sememster, with 16-18 hours a semester in a proscribed sequence, with none of the classes available in the summer after next year due to the specialized nature of the degree. But, if HOPE ends up footing the bill for 8 semesters, I will still be one very happy parent — one semester’s tuition seems like a bargain!

freemarketeductor

December 15th, 2009
2:02 am

Ms. Hammon

You have just learned the enduring economic truth: there is no such thing as a free lunch. Sadly, this law was hidden from you by parents and educators all along the way. And let’s throw in lying politicians and so-called MSM. THERE IS NO EXCUSE! But here’s some hope that will never change. You can still get a FREE RIDE. Enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dZfRZbR_Lk

HATL

December 15th, 2009
9:33 am

I went to UGA for grad school, and I remember being shocked at the sense of entitlement of UGA undergrads. So many UGA undergrads seem to underperform–a 3.5 GPA there means that you showed up to class once in a while. Aside from really one or two students in the Foundation Fellows Program, there were so many slackers at UGA. You get to go to college for free for four years and all you have to do in return is function like a human being. Be grateful that you got the opportunities you did. Only in America would a sports management/marketing major feel entitled enough to ask for MORE scholarship money.

irisheyes

December 15th, 2009
11:26 am

Wait a second. Here we have a well-written, thoughtful piece by a college senior who appears to have used her education to its fullest potential, and all people can do is complain about how she feels “entitled” and how it’s proof of how “lazy” students are today. I guess having opinions that you can clearly articulate aren’t that important if they don’t agree with yours. We need more college graduates like this young lady. Even if you don’t agree with her, at least she’s willing to join the discussion.

Author

December 15th, 2009
11:35 am

HB — I want to thank you for your feedback. You replies have been great constructive feedback. Yours is the kind of “sage advice” that keeps young minds in the pursuit of higher goals.

DB — I understand that everyone doesn’t agree, but that’s also politics. I’m not a politician obviously and this being my first article, it is obviously going to have some flaws. I appreciate your feedback also and wish your daughter the best of luck at UGA. It’s a great school and her time here will go by faster than you can imagine! Go Dawgs.

freemarket — a free lunch would be in you didn’t earn it. And actually, there are several opportunities in the “real world” for a lot more “free” lunches… how about the Lottery… which funds the HOPE. I’m really not going to argue or debate with you, seems pointless.

HATL — underperform? you should be ashamed of yourself. Judging the masses by the few students you observed. There are slackers at every school and any GPA worth it’s salt is earned, not entitled. I must admit, after a few times studying ALL NIGHT, it can be hard to function like a human being. I am grateful. How about you read my responses before jumping on the entitlement bandwagon. Only in America would a grad student think he is qualified to judge someone else. And hello, it’s SCHOLARSHIP money, if someone a long time ago didn’t ask for more, we wouldn’t have as much as we do now in the first place. If you are really degrading my majors… go check the rankings of Terry College of Business and read up on the contribution of Sports to our economy… MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR industry. Thanks for your opinion, but I can’t see how your argument is any more than a grudge against UGA undergrads and judgment against your opinion of a ‘lesser man’.

Author

December 15th, 2009
11:39 am

Thanks irisheyes. 1 positive comment will always be worth more than 100 negative ones.

Maureen Downey

December 15th, 2009
11:44 am

Amanda (author), You handled your critics with great aplomb. Thanks for the piece and thanks for coming here to respond.
Maureen

Author

December 15th, 2009
11:50 am

To all the critics,

Here is the quote that inspired the entire article:

“You are educated. Your certification is in your degree. You may think of it as the ticket to the good life. Let me ask you to think of an alternative. Think of it as your ticket to change the world.” – Tom Brokaw

I’m using my education to change the (college) world. It may never happen, but at least I’m trying something bold and can think back in a few years and know that at least I tried.

HATL

December 15th, 2009
12:18 pm

1. According to SRDE 2005 study, the four year graduation rate at UGA is 43%. To give that context, the four year graduation rate at the Univ. of Virginia, another public university, is 84.2%. This is a HUGE inefficiency. I understand that the author isn’t taking more than four years for some blameworthy reason, but using precious resources to subsidize students wishing to take more than four years at UGA just doesn’t make sense.

2. The Terry College of Business is ranked 30th for Bachelors degrees in Business Admin (the general undergraduate business degree). It has better rankings in a couple of specialities. In short, its ranking is OK. But you have to remember that 7 of 8 Ivies, Duke, Stanford, and really the majority of top schools choose not to offer undergrad business classes. In other words, UGA has a lot of work to do to be considered a top place to go for business. This just underscores the fact that money should be going to attracting better students and to improving resources, as opposed to other things.

3. I think it’s important to talk about these issues, but asking for more money after having received four paid years at UGA is asking for A LOT, absent some truly extraordinary contribution or accomplishment. Instead of a 3.5 GPA threshold, which is really setting the bar low at UGA, I would only give out extra money for people who have demonstrated extraordinary talent, was unsuccessful in getting other sources of scholarship money, and has contributed extraordinarily to the university community.

catlady

December 15th, 2009
3:35 pm

Hey, “educator”, you couldn’t be more wrong. I AM very proud of my children and parents and their accomplishments, however, as a divorced for 23 years single parent of 3 who got a master’s and PhD from 2 major universities after my divorce (but while my children were 3, 6, and 12 at the start) with no child support (until after the last one graduated high school, when DFACS stepped in and recouped the money-$20 per week per child)

In addition, other than the 7 years I was in grad school, I have been a teacher since a week after I turned 21, and you know how that pays!

My point is, the young lady has done well FOR HERSELF with a great deal of financial support. You’d expect a bright and motivated young woman to do well, and graduate on time, or at least not complain about a semester’s worth of tuition.

I fear the working world will be tough on her.

catlady

December 15th, 2009
3:59 pm

BTW, Amanda, how much did your extra semester cost the taxpayers of Georgia? Yeah, I know that HOPE is lotter-funded and paid tuition and adab of other things, and you or your parents paid room and board, but I guess you are not aware that each year the people of Georgia, through taxes, pay a little more than $12000 for each student? This is because tuition (in your case, HOPE) pays only about 30% of the cost of putting on the classes, regardless of your housing status (which you would have anyway no matter where you live unless you are dead).

So, while you were getting a double major in fields that don’t seem to show a lot of room for growth (and certainly don’t see life-changing, as might, say, microbiology or immunology) the taxpayers were supporting this quest to a tune of an additional $6000 more or less.

Please report back to this blog on your job search in about 6 months.

Tech Grad

December 15th, 2009
6:17 pm

“And hello, it’s SCHOLARSHIP money, if someone a long time ago didn’t ask for more, we wouldn’t have as much as we do now in the first place.”

Oh dear. This is my main problem with your argument. More money doesn’t come to the HOPE program just by asking for it. It’s not something where the Georgia congress can appropriate more money to it. It’s not something where the fund can petition wealthy donors. It’s dependent on a fixed income source, the lottery. Now you could expand the reaches of the lottery in the attempt to generate more income, such as by putting in those slot machines that were proposed in Underground, but that’s not going to happen. In fact, since HOPE was created, surrounding states have created/expanded their lotteries, which hurts sales in ours. So you’re stuck with the fixed (and occasionally declining) budget. You can’t just ask for more.
So the question becomes: do super seniors merit having money that exists in the program reallocated to them? No, I don’t think so. This is just an opinion of course, but I don’t see how it’s more “fair” to give money to people who choose (yes, it’s absolutely a choice) to go for an additional semester and then deny scholarships to others who meet the mostly fair grade point criterion. The program as it is currently incarnated meets the needs of the *majority* of students. It is designed so that every student in Georgia who maintains a 3.0 can get some sort of college degree. It is not designed so that every high achiever in Georgia can meet every exceptional goal that they have set for themselves. It’s a shame that there’s not the money for that, but there isn’t. Perhaps allowing a system where students can petition to a committee for an extension under extraordinary circumstances (such as when classes were dropped for hardship reasons) is a good idea, but I’d never support a committee that gives those exceptions to people pursuing extra degrees.

Author

December 15th, 2009
8:43 pm

catlady — my extra semester didn’t cost you anything. and my degree is not your concern.

Author

December 15th, 2009
8:53 pm

I thank everyone for their opinions and feedback, but honestly, this week is graduation week, a week of celebration and you all are being completely rude to an opinion by downgrading my degree choices. As parents and established professionals, as I assume many of you are, I’m well aware of the hardships facing me and am doing everything I can do prepare for them, so it is not your job to be harsh and negative; as bloggers you should aim to mold opinions into an established working framework, not shoot them down. I’m choosing to no longer participate in the responses because they only seem to offer negativity instead of constructive criticism, something I certainly won’t allow to consume my thoughts as I walk at graduation.

alch

December 16th, 2009
12:51 am

So, not only does she have this sense of entitlement (which clearly came thru in her written piece and her responses) but she needs a serious attitude adjustment as well.

I totally agree that HOPE should not be extended beyond the 127 credit limit. The rule was made a few years ago because of students like the author…professional students who stayed in school and used up the HOPE funds. HOPE is not a never-ending pot of money. And as someone else asked…if you extend the scholarship cap, where will it end? Plus, GSFC will also have to extend the cap for the HOPE grant. There are alot of students with bachelor and masters degrees returning to get techinical training. Would they be able to receive HOPE as well? Right now they don’t. As brilliant as the author is, she has tunnel vision and is unable to see the big picture as well as think about all of the ramifications of her proposal.

My daughter is a GA State student and a HOPE scholarship recipient and we knew of the cap. She declared a major during her first year and we made sure that her classes were mapped out. She experienced a health setback and had to sitout the spring last year as well as had a couple I grades from the fall changed to W, but she is still on the scholarship.

I work at a university and I see many Amandas every day. “I knew the rules, but now that I’am being affected, it’s not fair.” I’m surprised she didn’t say no one told me…that’s a favorite. They always think you should break the rules for them. What Amanda and they others do not understand is that when you bend the rules, you set a precedent and open a hornet’s nest.

catlady

December 16th, 2009
7:26 am

Dear Amanda: get a grip. EVERY student, even YOU, costs the taxpayers money when you attend. For a rough estimate, take the out of state student tuition, subtract the instate student tuition, and you have an idea how much. It’s not all about you and how much you have suffered.

And yes, unless you end up needing social services due to being unable to get a job, your choices on the job front are not my problem. I am sure you did lots of research to find out what the opportunities are, and with your enthusiasm you should be able to land some sort of a job. Luckily you will have minimal student loans to pay back.

I do think that you have a long way to go in learning to evaluate the positions that others might take. Perhaps those kinds of skills would help you in the negotiations you might be a part of for your clients. I think it is largely a sign of immaturity that you are unable to do this, but I also see something you need to develop. Perhaps some debate club activity would have helped.

At any rate, best wishes and congratulations on your graduation.

RMH

December 16th, 2009
8:56 am

Amanda,

If you didn’t think any of this was our concern, why did you complain in a public forum?

Pompano

December 16th, 2009
10:06 am

What an entitlement mentality by this young lady! The State of Ga should provide her with an open-ended tab so that she can “play” in her clubs?

What an ungrateful example of the “all-about-me” generation that seems to be coming of age.

Bunny

March 5th, 2010
10:08 am

I just wanted to note, for those individuals who claim that they are paying for Amanda’s education, that they are not actually paying for her education. The HOPE scholarship is funded by the lottery, not by tax dollars. So, this is not the burden on tax payers that some posters seem to insist that it is.

As a college student, I am grateful to help, and I am saddened that Amanda does not share this same gratitude. It’s actually very unfortunate. I feel very lucky that the state of Georgia provided a service that has allowed me to go to college in a way that was affordable and based on my own hard work. This lifted a huge burden off my parents, and considering the economy, I don’t know that I would have been able to even attend college if it hadn’t been for HOPE.

I graduate next semester, and I will have to pay out of pocket for some of it. However, I chose to work and save my money just in case this happened. Sometimes, sacrifices have to be made. I am just happy that this scholarship was there at all.

New college kid's mom

March 22nd, 2010
1:04 pm

Bunny and Amanda-
Wake up – your college education DOES cost the taxpayer. Just look at the Georgia state budget and see how much tax $ goes to the state’s universities and colleges. Why were those college students recently protesting outside of the state capitol? It is critical that the population of this state and this country be fully aware of where our tax money goes. WAKE UP and educate yourselves. We are doomed if we do not act as watchdogs over our government officials.

upset super senior

June 20th, 2010
2:45 pm

I too am a super senior (at an Illinois State University) whose financial aid was taken away. It is really disheartening to me that my school cannot support my final semester of education. I was awarded two grants, and upon reaching the max. credit hour load was told politely that I am having to pay out of pocket now. At 18 I was not ready to make my final choice on career fields as I changed my major 2.5 years into it. so now going on my 6th year of college… yeah I get it (Trust me… I want to graduate). However, my university gave me the opportunity to appeal my financial aid. I had to supply them with letters from my advisors, a plan to complete the required course load, and a letter explaining why I had not finished yet. I met all requirements and have one semester (a 9 credit hour course) which remains. I have completed my application for graduation, and now I am facing the ugly fact that I might have to go on for 7 years in order to take 1 year off to work enough in order to pay for my final semester. In some instances, I really truly wish that schools would want to promote their graduating students and show their appreciation of hard work. My plan included in my appeal outlined the past 2 years of courses, grades, and accomplishments I was able to make in order to meet the graduation requirements while following prereqs. etc. The timing of my plan- perfect. My ability- sustained with above a 3.5 gpa. I do understand that money is tight right now, but it does put me down… not the kind of attitude I really want in my final semester.
Hence- I feel the pain, frustration, and chaos that this causes upon students. The truth is that most universities programs are grueling enough to qualify as 5 year programs now. In some instances, I think that there is not enough notice going towards students who give back to the school, put in a lot of effort to achieve, and are able to succeed. Students who strive so hard only to be let down by their financial aid or school tuition adds a lot of stress to an already stressful year/semester. It also does not promote positive attitudes and feelings towards the school when leaving. I know that if my school supported me fully, I would be more willing to support my school even after graduation. In my situation- when I started at my college it was a well hidden secret that the school had only a 14% graduation retention rate from freshmen to graduating seniors. One might think that the school would really try hard to offer more opportunities to get its freshmen to senior students graduation support.