I am now on a conference call with the NAEP folks and will post more shortly. In general, national scores show no change in 4th grade, but rose across the board for 8th graders. Georgia follows suit.
Here is what the DOE has to say:
Georgia is one of just 15 states to show
significant improvement in eighth-grade mathematics, according to national
test results released today.
The results of the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP) are the first national results that show the impact of Georgia’s
new mathematics curriculum. Nearly all the grade 8 students who took the
NAEP last school year had been taught using the Georgia Performance
Standards (GPS) in mathematics for three years.
“This is the first evidence we have that the GPS is helping our
students be more competitive at the national level,” Superintendent Cox
said. “I am confident this is just the beginning of the gains our students
will show on national tests as our new curriculum takes hold.”
“These latest Math NAEP scores continue to show that we are making
significant progress in the most important subject areas,” said Governor
Sonny Perdue, who was named to the National Assessment Governing Board in
May by U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan. “Our scores are improving at
a faster rate than the national average, which is a result of the hard
work of our students, parents and teachers.
Georgia’s eighth grade scores on the NAEP have also shown a higher rate
of growth than the nation over the last several years. In 2003, Georgia’s
score of 270 was six points lower than the nation (276). This year’s
results show the gap between Georgia and the nation has decreased to just
four points.
“Since I became State Superintendent in 2003 my focus has been on
implementing a more rigorous curriculum and requiring higher expectations
of all students,” Superintendent Cox said.
The National Assessment of Educational Progress is a test given to a
representative sampling of students from each state across the nation. The
test is scored on a scale from 0 to 500 and is also broken down into four
scoring categories: below basic, basic, proficient and advanced.
NAEP results for Mathematics were released today in grades 4 and 8. NAEP
results in other subjects, including reading, will be released in the
coming months.
GRADE 8
Georgia is one of 15 states that shows statistically-significant
improvement on the Mathematics NAEP when compared to the last test given
in 2007.
Georgia’s eighth graders scored 278, up three points and just four
points behind the national average of 282. All subgroups in Grade 8 showed
improvement, most notably Hispanic students (270, up four points from
2007) and economically disadvantaged students (265, up three points).
“Georgia’s eighth-graders gained on the nation and showed improvement
in every major student subgroup,” Superintendent Cox said.
“I know that if we stay on our current path in mathematics, our students
will continue to be competitive on national and international
assessments.”
About two-thirds of Georgia’s 8th graders (67%) scored at basic level
or higher on the 2009 NAEP — up three points from 2007 — and
27% scored at proficient or above, up two points.
“We will not be satisfied until all of our students are scoring at
higher levels on the NAEP,” Superintendent Cox said, “but it’s clear we
are making progress.”
The achievement gap between Black and White students in 8th grade in
Georgia continues to be smaller than the national average. Since 2003,
Georgia’s gap has decreased seven points from 34 to 27 while the national
average has closed only three points from 35 to 32.
Georgia has also closed the achievement gap among students eligible for
the National School Lunch Program and those that are not. This gap has
closed six points since 2003 from 31 to 25, while the national average
closed only one point.
GRADE 4
Fourth-grade scores on the Mathematics NAEP were fairly steady compared
to 2007.
Georgia’s grade 4 test-takers scored 236 on the Mathematics NAEP, up
one point from 2007 and just three points behind the national average.
Georgia’s student subgroup scores also remained generally the same. None
of the changes in Georgia’s fourth-grade scores were considered
statistically significant.
However, Superintendent Cox pointed out that the fourth-grade students
who took the NAEP had only been taught using the GPS in Mathematics for
one-and-a-half years at the time of the test.
“We should see significantly better results from our fourth-graders the
next time the NAEP is given,” Superintendent
Cox said.
In 2009, 78 percent of Georgia’s fourth-graders scored at or above the
basic level, down one point from 2007. However, 34 percent scored
at the proficient level or higher, up two points from the last test.
The achievement gap between Hispanic and White students in 4th grade in
Georgia continues to be smaller than the national average. In 2009, the
Hispanic to White achievement gap was five points less than the national
average.
MORE INFORMATION:
- National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) website:
http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
- Georgia’s Mathematics Curriculum: www.GeorgiaMath.org
17 comments Add your comment
jim d
October 14th, 2009
11:04 am
Someone correct me if I’m wrong. But these points are BELOW the national average–right??
Joy in Teaching
October 14th, 2009
11:41 am
It doesn’t happen overnight, Jim D….takes a lot of work and patience.
Just a teacher
October 14th, 2009
12:19 pm
That is good news. It’s refreshing to hear something positive coming from the State Superintendent’s office. Congratulations to the Math teachers! My colleagues tell me that implementing that new curriculum has been tough.
jim d
October 14th, 2009
2:35 pm
OK Mo, here’s one for you to tackle.
how many ESOL students tested in Ga. in comparison to previous tests? and how many of these ESOL students were granted accomodation in comparison with previous tests?
These number alone have been known to influence NAEP test results drastically.
Cobb County
October 14th, 2009
3:39 pm
I don’t feel a few points means we are on an upward trend. We are still below the average, which is scary. As Jim d commented, you need more information on the students that were tested before you can draw any conclusions. Also remember they select the students that test for NAEP; it’s not like the ITBS where they are giving it to all children.
Please someone run against Kathy Cox and change the math. Encourage to group by ability so ALL learners receive material presented at their level.
EducationCEO
October 14th, 2009
4:42 pm
Please reread this: The achievement gap between Black and White students in 8th grade in
Georgia continues to be smaller than the national average. Since 2003,
Georgia’s gap has decreased seven points from 34 to 27 while the national
average has closed only three points from 35 to 32.
Look at where the national average started and where GA started: 35 vs 34. Next look at where Black students scored at the national level and where they scored in GA: 32 vs 27. Yes, GA may have closed the gap locally but nationally Black students still outperform students in GA. Why can’t the media just report what’s there and allow people to draw their own conclusions. The way it’s been reported misleads people to believe that GA has performed a miracle.
EducationCEO
October 14th, 2009
4:48 pm
No mention of the achievement gap between Black and White 4th graders…I am going to look it up. They tend to omit things that don’t paint our education system in a positive light.
ScienceTeacher671
October 14th, 2009
6:04 pm
Maureen, I think Cobb County has a good point about the ITBS being given to all students — and yet, we never seem to hear how Georgia students performed on the ITBS. Doesn’t anyone keep data on that? Can you find out?
ScienceTeacher671
October 14th, 2009
6:24 pm
Oh boy! Our 4th graders did better than the 4th graders in West Virginia, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Arizona! In all the other states, the 4th graders did as well or better than ours.
Despite their improvement, our 8th graders only did better than those in West Virginia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and New Mexico.
In other words, Georgia is still way down at the bottom….
EducationCEO
October 15th, 2009
1:34 am
Science Teacher: Sounds like we think alike! Ha ha!Too funny. Have you actually gone to the NAEP web site and looked at the scores? Very interesting to say the least.
Sosical study teacher
October 15th, 2009
12:10 pm
ScienceTeacher:
Just wait till they start testing science. I’m sure you guys are doing woderful job. Is there the ITBS test in science?
ScienceTeacher671
October 15th, 2009
6:44 pm
Sosical, at the high school level we have the End Of Course Tests in science – which are a joke, since the students only have to score 45% correct to “pass”, and more than a third of Georgia students can’t even do that (because they can’t READ the test in many cases) – and then we have the GHSGT, which actually counts (imagine that!) because students who don’t pass it after 5 tries can’t get a diploma.
We don’t, however, have a national science test so far.
ScienceTeacher671
October 15th, 2009
7:13 pm
CEO, I’ve glanced through them, but haven’t looked in depth, except enough to see that Georgia’s performance isn’t nearly as stellar as the DOE paints it….
Reality 2
October 15th, 2009
9:05 pm
Science Teacher,
Count yourself fortunate. Once they start testing in science and social studies, …
ScienceTeacher671
October 15th, 2009
10:22 pm
Reality 2, I still maintain that much of the problem with testing is that the children can’t read the tests.
math teacher 176
October 16th, 2009
6:44 am
It’s nice that you can simply escape to that excuse, isn’t it? Maybe we should keep saying the same…
ScienceTeacher671
October 16th, 2009
5:04 pm
Reality 2, the last time I looked, it was the science and social studies sections of the GHSGT students were failing, not the math and English parts.
math teacher 176, I have not seen the math tests, but I understand that there is a significant reading component to them. Do you know what the reading level of those tests might be, and do you know how it compares with the reading level of the corresponding language arts tests?