<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can districts provide too much information?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2009/07/08/can-districts-provide-too-much-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2009/07/08/can-districts-provide-too-much-information/</link>
	<description>Your source to discuss and learn about education in Atlanta, Georgia and the nation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:18:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reality</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2009/07/08/can-districts-provide-too-much-information/comment-page-1/#comment-3741</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/?p=712#comment-3741</guid>
		<description>First, why do school systems NEED to be exempt?  If the State rules/requirements are so horrible that school systems are lining up to become exempt, shouldn&#039;t the State change them?

Second, does this mean that there is no over sight at all over those exempt schools systems?  There is already too much &#039;under the table&#039; money with Boards of Education and too much unethical activity in school systems.  I just cannot believe that the State will allow that to run amuck even more.

Lastely, please do not confuse administrative and political decisions with the teaching profession.  We teachers are frequently at least as horrified as you at what goes on.  Our role is to teach a classroom full of your children to the best of our ability with the tools supplied to us.  We have ZERO input on decisions like these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, why do school systems NEED to be exempt?  If the State rules/requirements are so horrible that school systems are lining up to become exempt, shouldn&#8217;t the State change them?</p>
<p>Second, does this mean that there is no over sight at all over those exempt schools systems?  There is already too much &#8216;under the table&#8217; money with Boards of Education and too much unethical activity in school systems.  I just cannot believe that the State will allow that to run amuck even more.</p>
<p>Lastely, please do not confuse administrative and political decisions with the teaching profession.  We teachers are frequently at least as horrified as you at what goes on.  Our role is to teach a classroom full of your children to the best of our ability with the tools supplied to us.  We have ZERO input on decisions like these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sycophants for Downey, unite!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2009/07/08/can-districts-provide-too-much-information/comment-page-1/#comment-3735</link>
		<dc:creator>Sycophants for Downey, unite!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/?p=712#comment-3735</guid>
		<description>So Sue Milsap thinks that anybody who disagrees with Maureen Downey is automatically a complacent, and by implication, poor teacher? 

Never mind the constructive critiques made by reader after reader after reader on Downey&#039;s articles. Perhaps if Milsap weren&#039;t so complacent herself, she might have taken the time to analyze them, rather than dismiss them with no evidence to support why.

But rather than actually debate the merits of the arguments Downey makes, we are supposed to believe, according to Milsap, that the only validation needed to blindly follow anything that Downey says is that someone disagrees with it?

And this passes for critical thinking in the teaching profession?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Sue Milsap thinks that anybody who disagrees with Maureen Downey is automatically a complacent, and by implication, poor teacher? </p>
<p>Never mind the constructive critiques made by reader after reader after reader on Downey&#8217;s articles. Perhaps if Milsap weren&#8217;t so complacent herself, she might have taken the time to analyze them, rather than dismiss them with no evidence to support why.</p>
<p>But rather than actually debate the merits of the arguments Downey makes, we are supposed to believe, according to Milsap, that the only validation needed to blindly follow anything that Downey says is that someone disagrees with it?</p>
<p>And this passes for critical thinking in the teaching profession?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2009/07/08/can-districts-provide-too-much-information/comment-page-1/#comment-3731</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/?p=712#comment-3731</guid>
		<description>I think school systems should be very transparent since they are spending taxpayers dollars .  I am in favor of even more transparency- like school systems posting check ledgers online.  

I am hoping that IE2 goes away before too many school systems become exempt from the rules that actually benefit students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think school systems should be very transparent since they are spending taxpayers dollars .  I am in favor of even more transparency- like school systems posting check ledgers online.  </p>
<p>I am hoping that IE2 goes away before too many school systems become exempt from the rules that actually benefit students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seen it all</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2009/07/08/can-districts-provide-too-much-information/comment-page-1/#comment-3728</link>
		<dc:creator>Seen it all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/?p=712#comment-3728</guid>
		<description>No, districts cannot provide too much information. As it stands, most school districts are very secretive. Aside from providing personal information about its employees, public schools should be as transparent as possible. They have hid too much already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, districts cannot provide too much information. As it stands, most school districts are very secretive. Aside from providing personal information about its employees, public schools should be as transparent as possible. They have hid too much already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScienceTeacher671</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/2009/07/08/can-districts-provide-too-much-information/comment-page-1/#comment-3727</link>
		<dc:creator>ScienceTeacher671</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/get-schooled-blog/?p=712#comment-3727</guid>
		<description>The last sentence of the linked article says it all: &quot;Gwinnett schools officials did not comment.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last sentence of the linked article says it all: &#8220;Gwinnett schools officials did not comment.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
