Notes: Tech-USC nearly happened last year

Greetings

A few notes regarding Georgia Tech’s bowl date with Southern California Dec. 31 at the Sun Bowl.

1. It’s the third time that Tech has played in the same bowl in consecutive years. The first two times were the Sugar Bowl to finish the 1952 and 1953 seasons. On the first trip, Tech beat Mississippi 24-7 to complete a 12-0 season and win a share of the national championship. That team, you may remember, was honored earlier this season. The next year, Tech won the Sugar Bowl again, 42-19 over West Virginia.

The other instance was back-to-back trips to the Gator Bowl at the end of the 1998 and 1999 seasons, a 35-28 win over Notre Dame (Tech’s fifth bowl-game win in a row; Joe Hamilton had 356 yards of total offense) and a 28-13 defeat to Miami.

2. The bowl game brings together a matchup that was almost put together for the 2011 Chick-fil-A Kickoff game. Chick-fil-A Bowl president Gary Stokan had coach Paul Johnson and then-athletic director Dan Radakovich on board, as well as USC coach Lane Kiffin, but talks dried up when USC AD Mike Garrett was fired and replaced by Pat Haden.

Incidentally, I had a poster of Haden, then a L.A. Rams quarterback, on my wall as a child. I think my parents have thrown it away. No disrespect to Mr. Haden, but I find it a curious choice for a child growing up in suburban Chicago. I also had Earl Campbell, Ken Burroughs and Walter Payton, among others.

Back to Stokan. I talked to him a couple weeks ago, and asked about the possibility of Tech playing in the kickoff game, a popular topic among fans, it seems. He said he’s booked through 2014, but is going to start looking to fill dates in 2015-16-17. He noted that Notre Dame planning to begin its series of five games with ACC teams in 2014, that could create some possibilities with Tech or other teams in the ACC.

Nothing, though, is imminent.

3. This will be USC’s first bowl after its two-year bowl ban. Said Trojans coach Lane Kiffin, “It’s very exciting, especially after two years of sitting at home and not being able to go to a bowl game.”

4. I’m not sure we’ll ever get the full story, but the possibility of Tech dropping past the Sun Bowl never materialized, obviously. Tech officials, as I’ve noted, were open to the idea, both because they figured the Sun Bowl might want a different team and coaches and players might prefer a new destination.

Sun Bowl executive director Bernie Olivas said Sunday night that the bowl decided to honor the contract obligating it to take the ACC runner-up if available. Interestingly, the El Paso Times reported last week that there was also another clause in the contract that allowed the Sun Bowl to avoid picking a team in consecutive years, but Olivas wasn’t sure which rule took precedence.

Water under the bridge.

5. The Sun Bowl had the third pick of Pac-12 teams after the BCS games. Stanford will be in the Rose Bowl and the Fiesta Bowl picked up Oregon. After that, the Alamo Bowl took Oregon State (9-3) and the Holiday Bowl chose UCLA (9-4). The Sun chose between Arizona (7-5) and USC (7-5).

6. Due to the extended season, Tech players won’t have much time to recuperate. A year ago, the team took a week off before beginning practice the day after the announcement Dec. 5. The Jackets won’t practice Monday or Tuesday, but could begin shortly thereafter.

Tech can practice 15 times between now and the bowl game. Starting Wednesday, that’s a 25-day window until the 29th, the last day that the team would practice. Final exams run Dec. 10-14, all of next week. It’s conceivable Tech would not use all 15 practices. USC coach Lane Kiffin said he figured his team would practice 13 to 15 times and start Wednesday.

7. There’s nothing up on the Tech website about bowl tickets yet. I imagine something will be posted soon. I’ll keep you posted.

Thanks for reading.

Ken Sugiura, Georgia Tech blog

123 comments Add your comment

different year same result

December 3rd, 2012
10:22 pm

Ken, I was looking at the schedule for next year, who is going to be our 4th non conference game after Elon, BYU, and Georgia?

fuzzybee78

December 3rd, 2012
10:24 pm

Looks like the Trojans are a west coast “Clemson lite”. Big on O, especially the passing game, and short on D. We got a shot. Need a couple of turnovers like FSU but we got a shot. Hope Paul coaches like the Mad Hatter in this one.

wreckmaniac

December 3rd, 2012
10:26 pm

Regarding mules, you would beat a rented mule harder and more than your own mule, correct ?

Ken Sugiura

December 3rd, 2012
10:31 pm

Fuzzybee – I don’t think there’s anyone in that situation.

Ken Sugiura

December 3rd, 2012
10:34 pm

different year – still looking. i know they’d hoped to have found someone by now. i imagine it might end up being a Conference USA/Sun Belt type team. Two big challenges were the short notice of the ACC going back to an eight-game schedule after the move to nine games and then all the other ACC teams having the same issue and looking for teams.

different year same result

December 3rd, 2012
10:45 pm

thanks Ken, is there any time line on when it might get done, sooner or later

dbc

December 3rd, 2012
10:57 pm

Tech couldn’t beat N. Illinois let alone USC. Talk about a waste of a bowl… and time…and air… and anything else you can think about…

Supersize that order, mutt

December 3rd, 2012
11:18 pm

@ superDwag…..you have ONE OFFICIAL NC. Tech has FOUR OFFICIAL NC’s.

The funny thing about the game Saturday afternoon is that dummy Murray blew it by not spiking the ball to stop the clock. The mutts would have won if he had done that. I guess y’all have your Reggie Ball now. LOL

Supersize that order, mutt

December 3rd, 2012
11:20 pm

Aaron Murray = Reggie Ball LMAO !!!!!!

Santa Monica Jacket

December 4th, 2012
12:21 am

Lets be honest here… UGA didnt BEAT FLORIDA… FLORIDA beat themselves. Only a UGA team would beat their chest about BARELY winning a game that the other team had 6 turnovers. UGA has always backed into the SEC CG and clearly as demonstrated OVER and OVER does not have the horses to WIN ANYTHING OF CONSEQUENCE!! Give me a break you beat TECH 11-12 years…. Whats your record agaisnt UF?? They had the 104th ranked OFFENSE…worse offensive team they have had in like 10-15 years… YOU BACKED INTO THE SEC CG and got OWNED… I’d rather be a Tech and UF fan than route for the Dawgs… Like Steve says “They get all those talented recruits makes you wonder where they go when you play them”

BIrmingham Jacket

December 4th, 2012
12:27 am

This biggest disappointment was our poor leadership not getting us to the Big 10, and not putting us into a better position to win.

No doubt, Big 10 would have allowed us to play better competition, and gave us exposure to areas of the country that would have attracted better players not hell bent on playing in the SEC.

1 4 GT

December 4th, 2012
12:59 am

I wonder if Shane is a guy I know that lives on Lula Ln in Kennesaw?

Cats hav fleas 2

December 4th, 2012
6:19 am

Tech shouldn’t be in a bowl game. USC absolutely trounces them…what a joke!

The Dude

December 4th, 2012
6:53 am

We really have some of the worst, Nancy boy fans. complain, complain, complain. It must suck to be y’all.

11 of 12

December 4th, 2012
9:32 am

Supersize and 14. Yes, it still hurts and I am bummed for sure. No doubt about it. Murray wanted to down it and u can see it on replay but they called a play. I think his mistake was he was throwing to the wrong side of the field. He missed on the coverages.

Bottom line is we lost, it hurts, and u should get a good laugh at it as a rival. I can admit that. Going to be painful for a while. Doesn’t help that your b ball team is going to destroy us tonight as well. Lol

Uggghhhh!

Delbert D.

December 4th, 2012
10:05 am

Did anyone catch the ESPN interview with Matt Barkley on radio yesterday? The guy is sharp. They asked if he is set to graduate, and he will in December. The course he took this fall was computer forensics. That is a fascinating area of work.

Supersize that order, mutt

December 4th, 2012
12:13 pm

@ 11 of 12……I appreciate your honesty. Tech was also in a position to win but blew it, although not quite so dramatically.

Nieche

December 4th, 2012
12:40 pm

wow, how far GT has fallen from the historical powerhouse.

Adobe, Car Made of Clay, Sun Bowl

December 4th, 2012
12:58 pm

We’re having buyers remorse already.

AHDawg

December 4th, 2012
3:01 pm

@Golden Tornado: You forgot to mention the years 1941 when UGA won 21-0, 1942 when UGA won 34-0, 1945 when UGA won 33-0, and 1946 when UGA won 35-7 since you mentioned the two years in six that GT (1943 and 1944) did win. My all time favorite was 51-7 in 2002. Do I think we were 44 points better than GT in 2002? No, we just got on a roll. Anyway, I think GT will lose this bowl game, but I hope you guys win.

Adobe, Car Made of Clay, Sun Bowl

December 4th, 2012
3:33 pm

We just looked at Paul Johnson’s Bowl Record.
Someone in our selection committee is getting canned.
Good luck anyway, and enjoy the runner-up rings, with ACC 6-6 runner up engraved on them.

GT97

December 4th, 2012
5:36 pm

Hey…I live in San Antonio which is a short flight on SWA. Do ya think Tech will give me a couple of tickets if I make the trip?

tech fan ,74

December 4th, 2012
9:29 pm

Don’t be fooled. They selected Tech because they believe Tech is an easy win for USC. The same last year. They know Tech will not draw but Pac12 folks will flock to see one of theirs trounce an ACC team. I hope Tech proves them wrong. I’m tired of losing big games and bowls.