In his Tuesday news conference, Georgia Tech coach Paul Johnson gave more insight into schematic changes he wants to incorporate for the Yellow Jackets defense. In short, he would like the defense to distance itself from much of the approach of former coordinator Al Groh. Johnson recounted a number of problems he had with Tech’s scheme with Groh, most of it revolving around what he thought was an overabundance of complexity.
“We don’t need 80 calls,” he said. “You don’t need a buzzword on everything. We need guys to learn how to play and play hard.”
Echoing comments he had made previously, Johnson said he has become more involved in putting together the defensive game plan and practice schedule. He also said more players will play and suggested there will be fewer sub packages, saying that no-huddle offenses have exploited Tech’s defense by keeping a nickel or dime defense on the field after converting a first down on 3rd-and-long.
“And that’s what’s happening, whereas in years past, you didn’t see 72 guys change on third down,” he said. “There might be an extra defensive back go in and one guy come out.”
A change Johnson mentioned more than once is that the defense won’t change its play call on the fly as the offense shifts formation.
“There’s got to be some communication, but when one guy goes in motion, it doesn’t have to change seven people,” he said. “I’m not saying that the other way was that complicated, but the way it was, it wasn’t working. I got tired of hearing, ‘Well, I didn’t get a call.’ ‘Well, yeah, you did.’ ‘Well, no, I didn’t.’”
It may mean that players aren’t in the “ultimate supreme position,” as Johnson put it, but the hope is that a one-call system will reduce confusion or miscommunications. He said that at times, because of communication issues, one side of the defense was playing one call and the other side was playing another.
“I think you’ve got to learn how to play defense and you put your eyes on a guy and they’ll tell you where the ball’s going, as opposed to trying to recognize 82 different plays,” he said. “That’s just me.”
Other notes:
1. Center Jay Finch will practice Tuesday, but Johnson wasn’t sure if he would be in a gold (limited contact) jersey or not.
2. Johnson said he hadn’t seen a difference in strength and conditioning. With new strength and conditioning coach John Sisk starting in May, “I don’t think you’re going to see a difference this year,” he said.
3. Johnson on his recollections of Tech’s last game against Boston College, a 19-16 win over the Eagles in his first-ever ACC game. “We struggled offensively like crazy and we played really good on defense. We turned ’em over, held ’em repeatedly when we turned it over. And managed to hit a couple of plays offensively and just enough to win the game. … That was probably one of our better defensive games since I’ve been here.”
4. Johnson said his personal preference regarding the ACC’s scheduling format would be to get rid of the permanent crossover partners if rivalries such as North Carolina-N.C. State and Miami-Florida State could be preserved.
“Truthfully, Georgia Tech-Clemson, that’s a good game, that’s a close game, but it’s not the same rivalry as Georgia Tech-Georgia or North Carolina-N.C. State or Florida State-Miami probably, although it’s turned into one because we play each other every year. But historically, it probably wasn’t the same. But the other teams are, so I don’t know how they get away from [permanent crossover partners] unless they change divisions.”
In case you missed it…
Tech notes: Washington firm at quarterback
Notes:
Thanks for reading.
Ken Sugiura
107 comments Add your comment
GTBob
October 17th, 2012
4:07 pm
Because its a predicable loss?
Nope. It has nothing to do with winning and losing.
Brandon
October 17th, 2012
4:43 pm
@ GTBob, yeah just keep crunching those numbers; GT is a juggernaut team that has the ability to compete with any other. Just ask Moobs Johnson – “no defense can defend my triple option offense.” Based upon what I have seen so far….well….I beg to differ.
GTBob
October 17th, 2012
5:00 pm
Based upon what I have seen so far….well….I beg to differ.
Yeah, our offense has really been struggling this year. 37 points a game just isn’t getting it done.
Born2Buzz
October 17th, 2012
5:02 pm
Bayou,
1) Not according to CPJ. We are about to see. I think you are wrong, I think there is plenty of talent at LB, and enough talent on DL, just not a lot of depth. We were not physically overmatched against VT or Clemson, were we?
2) How do you know? Do you watch the GT practices? This is the lamest excuse and it’s been discussed constantly on the blogs. The GT 1st team D does not practice against the GT 1st team O. They are called scout teams. Now maybe there isn’t a top tier QB throwing against them in practice, but I’m sure. I would doubt that any schools scout team has a top tier QB that they are practicing against, otherwise he wouldn’t be on the scout team.
3) Everyone likes to talk about how poor CPJ is doing in recruiting yet if you look at the numbers he is doing as well or better than Gailey ever did. Are we getting the same level of talent as UGA, BAMA, UF, LSU, hell, all of the SEC schools, certainly not in the depth. To say we have the level of talent of UT Chat or Navy is just silly. Would you say that Clemson is recruiting on par with the SEC big boys? I sure didn’t see that we were physically overmatched against Clemson.
Coaching goes a long way and we were sorely deficient in the defensive coaching area. That was ultimately CPJ’s fault for hiring Groh, but we will see how things go from here.
Daniel
October 17th, 2012
6:24 pm
Wondering if Groh is hearing Paul Johnson’s complaints for the first time when he reads this.
Because reading Paul Johnson’s comments lately, it sounds like he’s watching game film of the defense for the first time in 3 years.
But seriously, Paul, you should go easy on Groh, you may need him to hire YOU in a season or two…
james brown
October 18th, 2012
7:36 am
Let’s face it people CPY sold his soul to the devil and got burn, It thought he was sticking in to Wommack and it came back to bite in the Ass . It’s going to be hard to get someone to come here with CPJ history of selling you out…..
Odd comments by the man in charge
October 18th, 2012
8:51 am
[...] comments by the man in charge Johnson on defense: ‘We don’t need 80 calls’ | Georgia Tech Just a tacky slam on Groh, warranted or not. Who was the Head Coach all this time?? This is just [...]