Some notes from Paul Johnson’s news conference regarding the dismissal of defensive coordinator Al Groh:
1. On Groh: “Nobody worked harder than Al. Nobody put in more time and I certainly appreciate everything he did while he was here.”
2. Johnson said he arrived at his decision Monday morning after taking time to mull it over and watch game video. He saw errors in communication and alignment that kept repeating themselves. As he said multiple times, Groh’s game plans were sound and he didn’t lack for knowledge. Rather, the communication of his plan wasn’t getting onto the field, in Johnson’s opinion.
3. Johnson’s involvement will be setting parameters and framework and from there will be provided as necessary. As is his wont, he said he prefers to give the assistants the leeway to do what they feel is best. One parameter he’ll stress is to keep the defense simple enough to be played without error.
“Certainly, we want to be multiple enough that we can play, but we want to be sound,” Johnson said. “I don’t want to come in Monday and have 40 missed assignments. It’s not going to do you any good.”
3. The scheme won’t completely change, although he said the line won’t play as much “two-gap” as it had, although the defense had been doing less of that. (In a two-gap scheme, linemen line up directly across from an offensive linemen and is responsible for the gap on either side of the offensive lineman. The idea is to “build a wall,” a phrase Groh often used, to force running backs to run laterally.)
In a one-gap scheme, a lineman sets up between two offensive linemen and is responsible for that one gap. It typically requires more players to commit to run-stopping, since the linemen are responsible for one gap each instead of two, but Tech’s personnel is probably better suited for it.
That said, Johnson has never been married to one defensive scheme or another.
“I don’t think you’ve got to trick people,” he said. “I think you line up and know what you’re doing and play fast.”
4. Johnson said the decision was based on a body of work and his conclusion that the problems weren’t going to go away. He acknowledged that Tech’s issues go beyond defense, but he felt the defense’s problems could be addressed with a change.
“It’s a chance to move forward and see how we can do,” he said. “I think that we can play better than we’ve played. So we’ll see.”
5. Johnson on player reaction: “I’m sure that you have mixed emotions. I’m sure that a lot of the players are disappointed. I’m sure Coach Groh was very well-liked. They also understand that we haven’t played as well as we’ve needed. … They’re fairly resilient. You’ll know in a week or two what their reaction is, I guess.”
6. Johnson said the defense will practice at a higher tempo moving forward with more live-hitting and full-speed drills. He acknowledged it being philosophically different from Groh.
“It’s not like we didn’t tackle in practice, but the pace of practice is a little bit different than what it will be,” he said.
He wants the team to spend more time on tackling and pursuit, “some of those things that we haven’t been as good at.”
7. Johnson said he was encouraged by the team’s play in the first couple games of the season, but “it became apparent that it was short-lived.” Notably, the third-down defense was worse despite attempts to address it long before the season began. Tech’s defensive conversion rate was 42.4 percent last year and is now 47.8 percent and 67.4 percent in the past three games.
“There was some recurring themes that we weren’t getting better,” he said.
8. Johnson said he didn’t think Groh’s firing will impact recruiting. He said he planned to call committed defensive players that night, which he evidently did. Michael Carvell has a post with reaction from Tech commits, including Darius Commissiong, a defensive tackle from Maryland who called Groh “like a father figure.”
9. Johnson on the difficulty of the decision: “It’s really disappointing and frustrating. You never want to do these things. You never want to have to, but to me, that’s part of being a leader. Sometimes you have to do hard things. I have a great deal of respect for Al. He’s, in my mind, had a very good career and may still coach. I don’t know what his future holds, but it just wasn’t working here. It doesn’t mean that it won’t work the next place or whatever, but it just wasn’t working right now.”
10. Johnson on the talent level: “I’m not sold that we don’t have good players. I’m confident in our players’ abilities. We’ll see.”
11. On possible replacements: “There’ll be plenty of time to worry about that and to evaluate that as the next six games play out.”
12. Johnson said he was hopeful that giving the remaining defensive coaches more responsibility will energize them. He said that Groh’s philosophy was that he often coached the defense as a whole, giving the position coaches less responsibility.
Johnson’s plan is to have players spend more time with their position groups.
Meeting with the entire offensive unit, he said, “I can’t get into the details and into the weeds like if I only met with the quarterbacks. I can get way more in-depth with them or way more in-depth with the receivers if I’ve just got the receivers in there because they don’t have to worry about what the offensive line’s looking at or doing. It’s just a different philosophy.”
Thanks for reading.
Ken Sugiura, Georgia Tech blog
111 comments Add your comment
Ron
October 9th, 2012
11:20 pm
We need to realize that Paul Johnson is not the coach we need at Tech. We need a more dynamic coach that can not only win, but one that can recruit and provide a better alternative than going off to our neighbors that border this great talent pool that we have here in Georgia. I really do not like the Offense that we have and the Coach is often putting us in crazy predicaments … OUR DEFENSE! We need to hire someone with a Pro-Style Offense that can get more “A” plus athlete’s on both sides of the ball. Heaven forbid us being behind by 2 TD’s, our offense can’t come from behind from a bad deficit. After all of this being said, i remain a long standing Tech fan and would love to know that we have a real chance to win everytime we take the field.
Full Metal Jacket
October 9th, 2012
11:49 pm
CPJ is here to stay, for at least another 2-3 years, barring a major scandal or the Rapture. (Not sure where we’ll all be at the Rapture but I don’t count on seeing many UGA fans there.) DRad has made it clear (and I happen to agree with him on this point) that while we are trending the wrong way recently Coach Johnson has earned the chance to right the ship and turn things around. I believe we’d have to have several disastrous (3 or 4 wins) seasons before CPJ’s seat gets really warm. I do hope we get the chance to see more of Vad Lee–I’m not convinced he’s as great as many think–and Coach Kelly now has the chance to revive the defense for the home stretch. This team is fairly young, and next season promised to be much better than this year even before this year started so badly.
GT Islander
October 10th, 2012
12:35 am
Drad STILL thinks CPJ is the “right man for the job”!!!!! This in spite of having hired Groh and kept him long after it was obvious that he could not get the job done. He has 9 loses in last 13 games with HIS players. 16/16 in games after the bulk of Gaily’s recruits were gone. This record brings a ringing endorsement from the AD? Maybe Drad needs to go as well is he things this record is acceptable by his “right man”!
Tech football is officially dead!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ron
October 10th, 2012
8:22 am
@ GT Islander…I totally agree! That ancient Offense will only win our division, not a BCS title! Paul Johnson is no Mr. Fix it, we’re only biding our time til we can grab the next great coach. Everybody elses program in the ACC is moving forward, we’re still dangling on the rope of hope!
old dog
October 10th, 2012
8:38 am
@IF Do Right………
Wrong my friend….we DO NOT have an SEC caliber o-line…period. We cannot compete (as we showed last year against Boise State, LSU, and Michigan State in the bowl game) with the likes of South Carolina in the trenches…..we have not recruited well on the o-line whan it comes to the level of SEC competition. It was not just that we had a bad game (which we did.) We got our tails torn up in the trenches up front, and if we played the(South Carolina) again the same would happen. Watch what I tell you….a good coach will stack up our line…..and whip us. And, it will not be luck; we just are lacking. I know what y’all are wondering….why is old dog on our blog? Well, old dog admires Tech for AT LEAST TRYING to address a problem. Every UGA person from arm-chair QB’s to UGA the bulldog knows our o-line is missing. We will continue to get smacked up front, and for all the great recruiting we do, we get a D (at best) on the o-line. We have NOT addressed it, nor have we really attempted to. Muschamp has been at Florida a short while….he has passed us. Even Dooley at Tennessee will pass us next year, ‘coz like his dad he knows it starts up front.
Congrats again on trying to correct a problem. Hopefully some of that will rub off on us……..
TechLB
October 10th, 2012
9:17 am
@Deep South/Prometheus – “If you examined the courses taken by FB players at Tech or at UGa, would you not find that there were certain courses populated in large degree by the most at risk athletes. And were the grades given out in these courses much higher than those given in other courses? Did such courses not keep athletes eligible. ”
“Just like coaches and their staffs at Tech and UGa know where to direct at risk players. Let’s be real!”
Ignorant comments about academics at Tech. Yes, there are a few freshman or elective classes easier than others where all students get better grades, not just athletes. When I was in school, Tech professors would call you out as being on scholarship and make it very clear there was no consideration given to athletes, in fact, more was expected.
Tech has very few classes to steer “at risk” players to, not even close to enough to keep a poor student in school for very long much less eligible. You have to pass some serious math classes to stay in school at Tech in every degree program and there are far fewer choices than in most liberal arts schools. That’s just being real. Are there some difficult programs at UGA and others? Sure! Just more options for less serious students.
I guess it makes you feel better trying to equalize the academics but it’s BS whether they play football or not.
beezit
October 10th, 2012
3:34 pm
“As is his wont, he said he prefers…”
Brilliant….a Masterpiece.!!.
GT79MD83
October 10th, 2012
8:30 pm
This will not help much this year. We can count on TW to not make plays in crunch time(4th Quarter or Overtime). Just look at the last 7 games.The defense gets alot of the blame but the offense cannot get that extra yardage necessary for first downs late in the game to sustain drives. And how about that masterfull usage of the clock.
Worst Fans Ever
October 12th, 2012
1:23 am
Ron and GT Islander, you should read this: http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2007/07/30/five-myths-of-paul-johnsons-offense/
Worst Fans Ever
October 12th, 2012
1:42 am
This one’s good for education also to all those CPJ haters out there: http://thebirddog.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/other-peoples-rivalries-and-the-futility-of-defending-against-the-wishbone/
unajacket
October 12th, 2012
5:11 pm
Does anyone out there believe that our defensive talent is as decent as NC State? They allowed l6 points to FSU & shut them out in the second half. Who is the defensive coordinator at NCS??