Greetings-
Some notes and observations from Durham and a brief look ahead to Saturday’s game.
1. It was one of Tevin Washington’s best games this season. He made plays both running and passing and got the ball pitched to the A-backs for a few big plays. He had that 39-yard touchdown run in the fourth quarter in which he shook off a couple tackles to get to the end zone.
I haven’t asked Paul Johnson or Brian Bohannon about this, and perhaps I should, but he’s shown a knack for getting off pitches at the very last instant, as he’s going down, to free up the A-backs.
“I think it was really Tevin reading,” Embry Peeples said, explaining the alleys he had for his runs. “They were trying to slow play him (force him to keep the ball), but he could kind of get close enough to them where they had to attack and he could just kick it out.”
A great stat from Tech sports information guru Dean Buchan: Washington’s 321 yards of total offense were the most by a Tech player since a 367-yard game in 2005 by Reggie Ball.
2. Duke quarterback Sean Renfree had season highs for a Georgia Tech opponent with 26 completions on 42 attempts and four touchdowns. His 250 yards were shy of Clemson quarterback Tajh Boyd’s 295. Boyd was 23-for 40.
Tech did not sack Renfree, continuing a pattern of not getting consistent pass-rush pressure. Renfree made it hard by getting rid of the ball quickly, but there were instances when he took longer drops and had protection. He was hurried a few times and flushed from the pocket.
In the past four games, opponents have 121 pass attempts and have been sacked three times, a 40.3 pass-per-sack rate. In Tech’s first seven games, opponents threw 203 times and Tech had 16 sacks, or a sack for every 12.7 passes.
I realize the numbers don’t say everything. A quarterback pressure that leads to an interception is far more valuable than a sack, for instance. And Tech’s sack total through seven games is weighted with a seven-sack game against North Carolina. But, it says something.
3. Tech’s loss to Virginia looks a little better with the Cavaliers’ defeat of Florida State Saturday night in Tallahassee. Virginia will play for the Coastal title next Saturday against Virginia Tech. It’s funny; before the Tech-Virginia Tech game, everyone (and I include myself) basically said that the game was for the Coastal title, assuming Virginia was going to take a third conference loss at some point. It wouldn’t surprise me if Virginia were to win Saturday in Charlottesville. It’d be the first time the Coastal representative hasn’t been Tech or Virginia Tech in the game’s history, going back to 2006. Four schools (Boston College, Wake Forest, Florida State and Clemson) have come fro the Atlantic side.
Crazy ending to that game. After Virginia drove late to go up 17-16, Florida State got the ball back with a minute left. On the last possession, there was an injury to a Virginia player that required him to be taken off on a cart, a facemask penalty on fourth down that kept alive FSU’s drive, a pass completion that appeared to end the game but was judged an incompletion on replay, giving the Seminoles a chance to try a last-second field goal, a penalty on Virginia that moved the field-goal attempt five yards and then finally the field goal itself, which hooked left.
Mostly, I was thinking that I was glad I didn’t have to write that game story on deadline. That would have been brutal.
4. I think both Clemson and Florida State’s losses improve Tech’s chances of playing in either the Chick-fil-A or Champs Sports bowls. I think it goes without saying that any bowl wants to put the best game together that it can, because, among other things, it likely means better ratings and fan bases that are excited enough about their teams and their bowl game to buy tickets.
If the Tigers and Seminoles crash and burn next Saturday against South Carolina and Florida, respectively, and Tech pulls the upset of Georgia, I don’t know if it’d be probable that Tech would end up in one of those games, but I’d say at least their chances would be pretty good. If Clemson were to lose in the ACC title game, that’d be a three-game losing streak, the Tigers would be out of the polls and Tech would be the highest-ranked team of Tech, FSU and Clemson. It’s conceivable Virginia might be a more viable option for the bowls at that point.
A lot is still up in the air, though. Virginia is finishing strong. Virginia Tech, if it beats Virginia but then loses to Clemson in the title game, is always a popular choice for the Chick-fil-A Bowl.
At this point, I’d think the Sun Bowl is still the most likely destination, but a lot can and will change things.
5. Except for the kickoff return unit, special teams was pretty good. The kickoff cover team kept Duke inside the 30 four out of six times and David Scully had his fourth touchback of the season.
Justin Moore made his fourth consecutive field goal and continued his PAT streak to 52.
6. An encouraging effort by B-back Charles Perkins in his stint filling in for Preston Lyons, save the fourth-quarter fumble Didn’t break any big plays, but he got four first-down runs and looked like he was running hard. I’m not sure how to tease out the numbers, but I’ll give the principal B-backs 905 yards (the 794 that Sims and Lyons had going into the game plus the 111 Sims and Perkins gained Saturday) for the season. (That wouldn’t count yards gained by Perkins and Richard Watson previously. It’s kind of nebulous, I realize.) With two games remaining, it would appear that they’ll be able to clear 1,000 yards to continue the B-back 1,000-yard streak, perhaps with ease.
7. Tech benefited from a holding penalty against Duke on the Blue Devils’ final drive of the game. It was just the fourth time this season that a Tech opponent’s offense has been called for a hold this season.
8. Two important objectives for Tech this week.
a) Find a way to stop Georgia quarterback Aaron Murray. If the pass rush doesn’t improve, the onus will be on Louis Young, Jemea Thomas and their cadre to deliver. Georgia tight end Orson Charles looks like a matchup challenge.
b) Punch up the B-back production some more. The 111 yards and two touchdowns Sims and Perkins gained were a good start. (The 25 carries, the most this season for the position by one, helped.) Against the No. 2 run defense in the country – 81.3 yards per game, 2.8 yards per carry – Tech will need as many viable options as it can have.
9. Condolences to the family of Larry Munson. He is a legend in this state and in college football and is an indelible part of the Tech-Georgia rivalry.
10. Tech and Georgia fans – let’s be civil this week. Good-natured ribbing is fine, but if you want to be obscene, disrespectful and generally unpleasant, you aren’t welcome to post and I’ll do my best to make sure you can’t. No tolerance this week. I’ll be busy this week, so it might take me a few hours to get to it, but I’ll ban with pleasure those who can’t play nice. “He started it” and “I couldn’t let those remarks go without a response” are not legitimate excuses.
Links
Durham Herald-Sun game story with sidebar on wide receiver Donovan Varner, another from the Raleigh News & Observer and the Associated Press.
Seth Emerson of the Macon Telegraph reports on Georgia turning its attention to Tech.
All of Chip Towers‘ excellent coverage of the Bulldogs here, including an obituary of Munson that’s definitely worth a read.
An old story but a good one. A 2008 Jeff Schultz column about how Johnson nearly became Georgia’s offensive coordinator.
Thanks for reading. Enjoy the week.
Ken Sugiura, Georgia Tech blog
366 comments Add your comment
TampaDawg
November 21st, 2011
3:11 pm
That same aformentioned Cinci team got beat up by Tennessee.
All the Fuss
November 21st, 2011
3:11 pm
What’s all the fuss about who’s played any good teams etc. Who cares.. On Saturday he who finishes with the most points has the braggin rights for a year… NONE of the other blather maters so save your breath
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
3:12 pm
Let’s revisit the following offensive rankings and then rethink UGA and Vandy defensive rankings:
Tenn #98
Auburn #93
Fla #91
SC #80
Vandy #102
Ole Miss #114
Kentucky #118 (out of 120!)
MSU #87
Bamajacket
November 21st, 2011
3:12 pm
Lex, if Vandy and Wake play their usual game, Vandy wins, at least by 7.
bruce
November 21st, 2011
3:13 pm
yeah them gators are tough. let’s see who they beat this year
fla atlantic
uab
tenn kentucky
vandy and furman. wow what quality wins.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
3:13 pm
Um Wake beat FSU and almost won AT Clemson.
Who is Vandy’s signature win?
TampaDawg
November 21st, 2011
3:14 pm
institute is calling for 4-1 versus the SEC with only one of those games having been played so far. We shall see.
TampaDawg
November 21st, 2011
3:17 pm
FSU sucks this year and everyone has figured that out. As for this little piece of work “Let’s revisit the following offensive rankings and then rethink UGA and Vandy defensive rankings:” I find it comical you will go through all that to post about UGA and Vandy, but I don’t see any of that crack detective work done on GT or any other ACC team.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
3:17 pm
Well well well, lowly Wake Forest is favored to beat Vandy.
And FSU is favored AT Florida.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
3:18 pm
Tampa, if i did that analysis on the ACC Coastal, you would be embarrassed.
Then you would say “well they don’t play an SEC Schedule”.. bla bla bla. So it’s pointless.
But facts are facts. SEC offenses are horrible, and inflate SEC defensive rankings.
GASouthern YellowJacket
November 21st, 2011
3:19 pm
It’s funny how the poodle fans love to give their 2 cent opinions of their team on our posts. Shouldn’t you be in class learning the A-B-C’s again? I agree with whoever said that the Tech win over Clemson was much better than any of UGA’s wins this year. If we can get pressure on Murray and at least handle their run game, we should have a very good shot at winning the state championship(funny how i think my school, Georgia Southern, would run all over you flea ridden poodle lovers, can’t wait to see the yardage Tech puts up on your “defense”). Oh, and dont expect an SEC Championship appearance every year, the pugs were handed that this year with that god awful schedule of theirs… TO HELL WITH GEORGIA! and GEAUX TIGERS! HAHA
BigTimeTechFan
November 21st, 2011
3:24 pm
Geogia Southern did better against Bama then most SEC teams
My understanding is...
November 21st, 2011
3:24 pm
…that the Chicken Bowl gets the ACC’s #2 team – that would be Clemson if they lose to SC and the ACC Champ game – it would be Va Tech if they beat UVA and lose the ACC game; and it would be UVA if they beat VPI and lose the ACC game – but, if Va Tech beats UVA and loses to Clemson, then it has been said in other places that they will still get the Sugar Bowl – so, that might put GT in the Chicken Bowl, and most bowls already have ACC or SEC or Big10 tie ins, so it matters not who may want ” the best match-ups” -
The real loser in all these games is the Orange Bowl – they may end up with a 3 loss Clemson team vs a Big East team that is not even in the Top 35…..
BigTimeTechFan
November 21st, 2011
3:28 pm
I think:
Auburn upsets Bama this weekend
Arkansas beats LSU
Georgia Tech beats UGA
Clemson beats USC
FSU beats Florida
Va beats Va Tech
Will Miss larry
November 21st, 2011
3:31 pm
Here’s is what the game will come down to. If the UGA team that played Auburn shows up it will be a cat walk for UGA. If the UGA team that played UK shows up, it will be a cake walk for tech.
Dawgs defense is for real, however the offense makes one just have to say hmmmmmm.
Good luck Jackets
Supersize that order, mutt
November 21st, 2011
3:34 pm
Tampa, I think you are greatly underestimating UVA, and I don’t say that because they beat Tech. Tech SHOULD have won that game, but played miserably. I’m not saying who would win if they played this year, but I put Vandy and UVA in the same category—-they both have OUTSTANDING coaches, and the future looks good for both of those teams. There is a lot of POTENTIAL in Nashville and Charlottesville, and the teams that those two schools will be playing over the next couple of years had all better wake up and realize it.
reebok
November 21st, 2011
3:35 pm
Tech fan here, offering condolences to all the Bulldog faithful about the passing of your legendary play-by-play man. Munson was one of a kind.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
3:37 pm
Supersize: Vandy and UVA in the same league? Hardly.
Vandy opened as an underdog to WAKE FOREST.
Supersize that order, mutt
November 21st, 2011
3:38 pm
Institute, I said in the FUTURE, because of the quality of their coaches.
Supersize that order, mutt
November 21st, 2011
3:39 pm
And, Institute, not to worry; I will be pulling for Wake over Vandy
dawgfan
November 21st, 2011
3:42 pm
This looks like your standard Monday before a UGA-Tech game. Techies are running their fat Techie mouths about how overrated UGA is. UGA hasn’t done this and hasn’t done that. The SEC is overrated and top heavy. LSU/Bama/Florida/Etc. would or has killed UGA. UGA has played a high school schedule. UGA lies, cheats, steals, and murders. Mommy, UGA makes me cry. Please make them stop mommy.
Good grief its the same mindless drivel out of you clowns year after year after year. Its like a broken record. Where has all of your tough talk about UGA ever gotten you Techies? Let’s start with that question and will go from there.
Thanks.
mike
November 21st, 2011
3:42 pm
I’m afraid that UGA’s offense will torch Tech. Tech can’t hold anybody to under 21-24 points. And 31 to Duke??? It could be ugly. Sigh….
Supersize that order, mutt
November 21st, 2011
3:51 pm
mike, we said the same thing in 2008 and 2010. 2008 turned out pretty damn good, and if we had been able to hold on to the ball, last year would have too.
To He'll With Georgia
November 21st, 2011
3:52 pm
I would have to say that this is uga’s toughest game besides boise st. I think that Larry Munson was the best broadcaster for football ever and may he RIP. On the game GT has to play hard nose on defense and get pressure on aaron murray.
DawginLex
November 21st, 2011
3:56 pm
Hey institute
You conveniently ignore us shutting down Tennerseeeee with Bray while they put up 50 on Cincy that destroyed NCSU that just DEEEstroyed Clempson. But don’t let facts get in your way.
George Stein
November 21st, 2011
3:57 pm
Comparative scores don’t matter, Mike.
Good lord, dawgfan. Get some new material. Do you just copy and paste every bleeping time?
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
3:57 pm
DawginLex: what kind of retarded logic do they teach at UGA?
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
3:59 pm
Here’s some mutt logic. UGA loses to SC who lost to Auburn who got destroyed by Clemson who got destroyed by Tech.
TampaDawg
November 21st, 2011
3:59 pm
@Will Miss larry .. Biggest problem for UGA against UK was that after the 2nd play on offense, they were down to Boo Malcome and Brandon Harton running the ball. That could be an issue regardless of who we play. On defense though, the linebackers are so fast whether it’s Jarvis Jones, Alec Ogletree, Christian Robinson, Michael Gilliard, Amando Herrera or whoever. That core is extremely good and make the 3-4 work much better than it did last year (last year, Ogletree was lined up at safety, there was no Jarvis Jones, Kwame Geathers had no help at NT, Herrera wasn’t there and the scheme was new to all of them). All the linebackers play their gaps and UGA shuts down the TO. If people are missing their gaps, I may need someone to pass the salt for the crow sandwich.
And I have heard it for the past 3 weeks about the schedule (really only that long because until then, people just kept talking abuot how UGA would lose week after week until finally, that rant couldn’t be said anymore) and the teams UGA played. But I was told on this very blog when GT ran up 600 plus yards of offense on Kansas, a REALLY BAD Kansas team, that 600 yards is awesome no matter who it is in FBS. So how is it different when you look at UGA’s defensive stats?
17.8 points per game
263.5 yards per game
15 interceptions
81 rushing yards per game
Bamajacket
November 21st, 2011
4:01 pm
Supersize, you’re correct. The exasperating thing about watching this Tech team play, is, that because of the high risk nature of their offense, they can be fabulous, as in Clemson, and mistake-prone (pick a game). UGA defense seems better. Our defense is schitzo. We could have won the last two. Thomas drops a pass, and last year, my God, could we have done more wrong? UGA plays this game with more confidence historically, and EXPECTS to win. No different this year. They usually find a way to win. If we execute, and …..hell, whoever executes better will win. They’res really not that much difference between the two teams. If, if, if….we need to play a solid game, and win the darn thing.
George Stein
November 21st, 2011
4:01 pm
This game will be determined by how well we move the ball against UGA and whether we can hang on to the ball. If we do both, we win. If we don’t, we lose. End of discussion.
George Stein
November 21st, 2011
4:03 pm
C’mon, Institute. Let’s not get into a urinating contest here. UGA blew out Auburn who beat South Carolina. If you can make that make sense, I’m all ears.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
4:03 pm
Tampa: actually it was 768 yards. Against ANY FBS team, that’s legit. Now if UGA was running up 600-700 yards on the SEC Least, that would be impressive. But alas, not the case.
south
November 21st, 2011
4:04 pm
UGA fan here. Thanks for the classy comments regarding Munson from Tech fans, I knew you had it in you.
As far as the game, it’s usually close, and should be this year.
I see all the idotic posts trying to compare teams played etc, etc…safe to say, if UGA wins, it will be their best victory so far and vice versa for Tech…
I like UGA to win, but I for one will not be surprised either way…
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
4:04 pm
George: read Tampa’s silly post prior to mine, and my post would make sense.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
4:05 pm
Umm, it tech wins, south, it would be our SECOND biggest win of the year.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
4:05 pm
but yeah, for UGA, we would be the best team they beat all year…
George Stein
November 21st, 2011
4:07 pm
South is right, it’ll be the best win for either team this season.
George Stein
November 21st, 2011
4:08 pm
Eh, I kinda like TampaDawg, Institute.
TampaDawg
November 21st, 2011
4:09 pm
Supersize that order, mutt
November 21st, 2011
3:34 pm
Tampa, I think you are greatly underestimating UVA, and I don’t say that because they beat Tech. Tech SHOULD have won that game, but played miserably. I’m not saying who would win if they played this year, but I put Vandy and UVA in the same category—-they both have OUTSTANDING coaches, and the future looks good for both of those teams. There is a lot of POTENTIAL in Nashville and Charlottesville, and the teams that those two schools will be playing over the next couple of years had all better wake up and realize it.
———————————-
Not at all super, actually, I think this is the most sensible tech post on here regarding UVA. They are good, not even close to great though. And to try to say they would (not that you did) destroy UF or Auburn is at best a stretch. Even a down UF team is very dangerous and Auburn still has a great running game .. if Barrett Trotter gets out of the way, they beat Clemson.
Bamajacket
November 21st, 2011
4:10 pm
No way, in any universe, is Clemson bigger than UGA. Never.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
4:10 pm
beating UGA is no doubt the one we want the most; but beating them will not be more impressive than beating an undefeated, then #5 Clemson team in devastating fashion.
That and the VT game 2 years ago are signature wins for CPJ (and the 2008 UGA comeback).
DawginLex
November 21st, 2011
4:11 pm
institute
So now I’m retarded?
so much for the be nice rules huh?
What kind of logic are you applying?
I’m stating facts.
You started spewing comparisons and I stated facts.
We also beat Auburn 45-7 and totally shut them down with them playing the best QB of their QB group.
Clemson had to come from behind to beat them with the QB who is now on the bench.
Yet Clemson is better than us?
Our defense is legit.
Ray charles can see it.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
4:12 pm
Tampa: your last point is just worthless; your only reasoning behind thinking Auburn or UF would beat UVa is because they are SEC teams. Sorry, that doesn’t work THIS year.
George Stein
November 21st, 2011
4:13 pm
Bingo, Bamajacket. A win Saturday would, by any definition, be a signature win.
south
November 21st, 2011
4:13 pm
as far as ranking they were, but things have changed since then…plus, if I gave every Tech fan the option of a win, which would you pick.
and don’t be fooled, this game is big for UGA as well, the players and coaches are very aware of this…
looking forward to it.
DawginLex
November 21st, 2011
4:13 pm
institute
Keep saying beating UGA means nothing.
Maybe you can convince yourself but no other Tech fan will agree with you.
Bigger win than Clemson?
Yeah, right.
I’m done with you.
TampaDawg
November 21st, 2011
4:13 pm
Thanks George.
Point I am trying to make, institute, that you danced around is this. If it is impressive to run up 768 yards against a team that is now 2-9, you can’t tell me those defensive stats aren’t impressive. 263 total yards a game is impressive, I don’t care if you’re playing Class 5a high school.
The Institute
November 21st, 2011
4:14 pm
I stated facts too, Tampa. Reread:
“UGA loses to SC who lost to Auburn who got destroyed by Clemson who got destroyed by Tech.”
George Stein
November 21st, 2011
4:14 pm
No doubt, Lex. THIS is the one we want.
So are we, south. Happy Thanksgiving.