I give credit to the Gator defense. They are very fast and good at forcing turnovers. But in that game, both of the INT’s were badly were under thrown. And the fumble by Knowshon was just pathetic, what was he doing? The biggest difference between the Gators of 2007 and 2008 was their ability to generate turnovers and capitalize on them. And more importantly, that knowledge alone, is what made teams get conservative against them. The thing about Florida is that you can pound the football at them with a big O’line and big back or with Shifty backs. That’s what Ole Miss did, pound the ball at them and Alabama did the same thing before they got away from their game plan. UGA has a finesse offense which plays into what Florida does defensively. I know you think your team is invincible Gatorman and I get that you’re a homer, but teams CAN pound the ball at your defense they really can. Which is why teams like LSU will be a tough match up for your team. As for UGA this year: YES I do think they’ll do better against the Gators this year 1.) because they have a bye week before that game and 2.) Because Cox while not as talented as Stafford is more accurate and makes smarter decisions. And even if he doesn’t, it’s not like they can do much worse that 49-10. I think it will be a closer game then you think Gatorman, but go on believing your team has no weaknesses if you want.

GT fan: I agree with you. Tech could have won those games in 2005 and 2006 with even consistent play at QB. I was at the game in 2006 and if Tech had made more of a commitment to the running game and ran Choice more they would have won. Hence the reason the triple option works well for Tech because they can recruit athletes and play to their strength on offense which is running the ball.

I give credit to the Gator defense. They are very fast and good at forcing turnovers. But in that game, both of the INT’s were badly were under thrown. And the fumble by Knowshon was just pathetic, what was he doing? The biggest difference between the Gators of 2007 and 2008 was their ability to generate turnovers and capitalize on them. And more importantly, that knowledge alone, is what made teams get conservative against them. The thing about Florida is that you can pound the football at them with a big O’line and big back or with Shifty backs. That’s what Ole Miss did, pound the ball at them and Alabama did the same thing before they got away with their game plan. UGA has a finesse offense which plays into what Florida does defensively. I know you think your team is invincible Gatorman and i get that you’re a homer, but teams CAN pound the ball at your defense they really can. Which is why teams like LSU will be a tough match up for you. As for UGA this year: YES I don think they’ll do better against the Gators this year 1.) because they have a bye week before that game and 2.) Because Cox while not as talented as Stafford is more accurate and makes smarter decisions. And even if he doesn’t, it’s not like they can do much worse that 49-10. I think it will be a closer game then you think Gatorman, but go on believing your team has no weaknesses if you want.

GT fan: I agree with you. Tech could have won those games in 2005 and 2006 with even consistent play at QB. I was at the game in 2006 and if Tech had made more of a commitment to the running game and ran Choice more they would have won. Hence the reason the triple option works well for Tech because they can recruit athletes and play to their strength on offense which is running the ball.

Now, you also have to remember what you’re saying here, in this blog, and apply it to most of the dog fans’ beliefs & statements regarding GA’s dominance over GT in the previous 7 games. Games in which a HORRENDOUS college QB (name w/held, but you know who I’m talking about), committed TOs & other horrible mistakes which played big roles in victories for the dogs.