GHSA considers all options for reclassification

Geographical and population concerns could prompt the Georgia High School Association to make the most radical change in more than a decade over how it divides its schools for athletic competition.

The vote is a month away, and nothing has been decided.

The GHSA’s reclassification committee could submit a proposal that has minimal impact — tweaking the existing five-classification structure — or the state governing body for high school sports could initiate significant change, including expansion to six classifications.

Another idea is to reduce to four classifications, with each divided in half for the postseason and offering eight state championships. That concept would allow members to play schools of closer proximity during the regular season, and schools of closer student enrollment during the playoffs.

As to which proposal will be submitted, it’s a big guessing game at this point.

“Right now, this far out, I wouldn’t wager which way we’re going to go,” said Dr. Ralph Swearngin, GHSA executive director. “I really don’t know. We could say we’re going to stay with the current system of five classifications and make some improvements. Or we could go with something radical. It’s too early to tell.”

Schools have complained that their teams have to drive too far for competition. Others have said they are matched unfairly against schools with larger student populations in the playoffs. On March 21, the GHSA executive committee will vote on a proposal finalized the day before by the reclassification committee.

Any voter-approved measures would go into effect in the fall of 2012. The last time the GHSA took an extreme action was for the 2000 season, expanding from four classifications to the existing five.

“We know we’re going to do something, even if it’s tinkering with what we’ve got right now,” Swearngin said. “We’ve recognized we’ve got some issues.”

The GHSA has a list of concerns from its 422 schools, with the main ones addressing proximity (Region 2-AAAA stretches 200 miles from Brunswick to Augusta), equal competition (some teams play others in the same classification with nearly twice the enrollment), and team disparity in a region (1-AAAAA has five teams, while 5-A has 28 from the Atlanta area).

“What are we going to do with the Class AAAAA and Class AAAA schools in South Georgia? That’s a major, major issue,” Swearngin said. “What happens is the people in the north complain because they only have 5-6 teams in a region. People down there complain because they have to drive hundreds of miles to play their games.”

The 12-member reclassification committee is studying high school structures in surrounding states such as South Carolina, North Carolina and Tennessee.

“It’s a difficult process because everybody has their own idea on what ought to happen,” said Dave Hunter, committee member and former Brookwood football coach. “I represent Class AAAAA, but I’m also concerned about fairness and a level playing field for all classifications. I don’t want to hurt one classification in order to help another.”

Here’s a quick look at the top ideas … [Note: To read the rest of this article, click here]

8 comments Add your comment

Terry Bradshaw

February 22nd, 2011
2:50 am

GHSA suggestion

February 22nd, 2011
7:50 am

Why not take a look at what Texas is doing? There are similarities between the two states. Texas has great disparity in enrollments across the state with some suburban Dallas schools having nearly 4,000 students, some in west Texas have 200 or fewer students. Travel is an issue in Texas as well with schools like Odessa Permian (Fri night lights) traveling 6-7 hours each way to play Euless-Trinity. Just a suggestion.


February 22nd, 2011
9:00 pm

Lets put geography at the top of the list, break the state into regions, and then divide into classes. I do think money wise we need to move more towards regional/sectional set ups as opposed to class by strictly size and huge travel distances.


February 23rd, 2011
7:05 am

I like the system in North Carlina where you preserve the natural rivalries by keeping teams close to home during the regular season; however during the playoffs, NC high schools compete against similar size schools. During the playoffs, each classification is divided in half with the larger schools within each classification competing for the “A title” and the smaller schools within the same classification competing for the “AA title”. For example, in NC , high schools with enrollment of 0 to 1,000 are classified as “1 ” ( A classification in Georgia) and will all be divided for playoffs in a manner where all schools above 500 will compete for the 1A title and all schools below 500 will compete for the 1AA title. So forth with the other clasifications: 2: 1,000 student to 2,000, 3: 2,000 to 3000, and 4: 3000 students and up. Also, during the playoffs, pairings here lately take into consideration travel costs. The first two rounds are based slely on geography after seedings. This helps to control the traveling expenses. Again, this model preserves local regular season rivalries in the Charlotte, Raleigh, Greensboro, Asheville, Wilmington, Fayetteville, and Winston Salem areas because you can play within your conference during the regular season. In the playoffs, you are playing comparable size schoools, and keeping costs down. Having grown up and played high school football in Georgia (Gainesville), I did not initially like this model here in NC b/c I thought that too many teams were being rewarded (8 state champions). It works, though.

[...] More… Posted in Uncategorized Tags: Georgia, Georgia High School Association, GHSA « Swimmers win best athlete awards at National Games You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. [...]

Stuart Overbeck

December 7th, 2011
7:38 am

Merely wanna remark that you have a very decent website , I like the style and design it actually stands out.

This is awesome. And exactly what I needed to hear at this moment in my little mommy life.

December 16th, 2011
5:42 am

Enter your comments here

Jeffersone Dalphonsew

July 30th, 2012
2:30 am

I believe that is one of the most significant information for me. And i am happy studying your article. However want to remark on few common things, The web site style is great, the articles is truly excellent : D. Just right job, cheers