Bush DOJ decided New Black Panthers no major case

BTW Ms. Tucker,

In case you haven’t heard, you were mentioned on Rush’s show today. Of course it was not in flattering terms, but any press is good press, right?

• Link
• Report this comment

Politics, man politics. Don’t ya jest love it?

• Link
• Report this comment

So much for freedom of speech Tucker. You can spew all the venom you want, but God forbid anyone talks back.

• Link
• Report this comment

Is the statute of limitations up or can the mighty Kenyon file charges ?
Can you tell me that if a hooded klansman like Robert Byrd stood at a polling place with a billy club you would call it minor ?

• Link
• Report this comment

Ms. Tucker,

You may or may not be correct in your description of voter intimidation intentions (Think-If voters are intimidated, would they actually come forward in the presence of individuals of whom they are not necessarily confident will protect their civil rights?); however, it is quite interesting that you neglect to identify the entire scene. How can you omit the hate speech that should unquestionably be attached to your story? The apparently ignorant New Black Panther president angrily shouted the importance of killing “cracker” children and the women who bring them in to this world. Is this language intentionally intimidating? In order to report or explain a topic in mass media, one should sincerely provide all information to the reader in order for him or her to develop an informed opinion. Unfortunately, you did not provide an unbiased perspective of the scene and, as a result, will undoubtedly prevent many others from forming an educated unbiased one.

• Link
• Report this comment

So much for freedom of speech Tucker. You can spew all the venom you want, but God forbid anyone talks back.

Poor wittle victim, joan.

• Link
• Report this comment

I think a lot of us have become use to black racism and are no longer really intimidated by it, more saddened.

It is true that voter intimidation cases almost never get brought.

• Link
• Report this comment

so just to be clear, Ms. Tucker, individuals are allowed to stand in front of a polling place showing a nightstick? Yes or No? You are okay with that and have no problem with it?

Second, why do you keep bringing this “the Bush administration made the decision to downgrade it to a civil case and not pursue criminal charges. I hope you read the post.” up in an effor to distract from the real issue? The 3 individuals were found guilty of civil violations and then the DOJ mysteriously dropped the case before the sentencing was complete.

“As many observers noted on that day, no matter how badly those two New Black Panters were behaving (and the police were called and responded), it’s a HEAVILY DEMOCRATIC PRECINCT.”

Again, this makes it allowable to stand in front of a polling place on election day brandishing a nightstick?

btw, your citation of Media Matters, is the final straw in the laughable “unbiased” and “truthful” charade you’ve put forth.

• Link
• Report this comment

Ms Tucker, don’t call Media Matters and American Prospect solid reporting, because they’re anything but solid or responsible. Two left-wing hit squads, regardless of your so called facts. The Obama administration and Eric Holder in particular are not interested in justice in the New Black Panther Party’s voter intimidation case or enforcement of our immigration laws. Did you see personally witness any of J. Christian Adam’s testimony? You and the corrupt people you advocate for have no credibility, and the voters will make that clear in Nov.

• Link
• Report this comment

btw, on a completely unrelated note (well somewhat related as it deals w/ ctucker’s repeated dishonesty and untruthfulness), anyone else notice the irony of the fact that in an article about “the tendency of human beings — especially those who are committed political partisans — to ignore actual facts and believe what they want to believe..” good old ctucker herself cited a newspaper column from the Wash Po which itself was untruthful and mangled several facts??

1) Beheadings have happened in Arizona
is.gd/dpBDn

“In January 2010, Congressman Rob Bishop visited our ranch here in Santa Cruz County , Arizona . During that visit, I related to him an incident that occurred on June 27, 2008, in one of our pastures west of the ranch house. “On that day, one of our ranch hands was working horseback and discovered a human head near a trail believed to be used by drug and alien smugglers.”Although the head was missing the lower jaw, it was immediately apparent that much of the mass and flesh of the head was still present. The cowboy searched the area in hopes of finding the remainder of the body to no avail.”The Santa Cruz County Sheriff’s Office was notified and they took possession of the head on that same date. We suspect that the head may have been placed along side the trail as a warning to other drug and alien traffickers using the trail.”

2) Crime rate along the border has been increasing.
is.gd/dpBCF

The rural crime rate for 2006 has moved up by about 75 and the 2007 rate has moved up by about 100 while the big city rate is relentlessly dropping,

3) Phoenix WAS the 2nd most dangerous city for kidnappings in the world in 2009.

is.gd/dpBBJ

In what officials caution is now a dangerous and even deadly crime wave, Phoenix , Arizona has become the kidnapping capital of America , with more incidents than any other city in the world outside of Mexico City and over 370 cases last year alone.

ctucker, if you wanted to write something interesting about immigration you could profile Joslyn Johnson, now a widow due to an illegal immigrant. Don’t worry she’s black so that fits your narrative perfectly.

is.gd/dpBAE

• Link
• Report this comment

to be fair, i think fox is carelessly allowing for the inference that the issue is whether or not criminal charges should have been sought (as opposed to merely civil relief). aag perez isn’t an appointee, i see no basis for doubting his testimony under oath.

but, while the testimony helps to exculpate obama/holder as to any charge that they intentionally saved these guys from criminal prosecution, it doesn’t necessarily have any relevance to claims the justice department (then under the obama admin.) declined to seek harsher civil relief (i.e., monetary damages).

i’m not saying they did or did not; just wanted to make it clear that “bush’s d.o.j. chose not to seek criminal prosecution” doesn’t have anything to do with a claim that “obama’s d.o.j. refused to seek proper relief under other available civil statutes on the basis of race”. finally, perez’ didn’t testify that the decision to forgo criminal charges was made at the same time or before the complaint for injunctive relief was filed. his statement that such a decision was, in fact, made at some time happened to immediately precede his statement that the complaint was filed on jan. 9.

there’s an inference to be drawn there, and while it’s probably correct, it’s not verifiable from that testimony or any other source i know of. he is a lawyer, likely capable of careful word selection.

• Link
• Report this comment

As many observers noted on that day, no matter how badly those two New Black Panters were behaving (and the police were called and responded), it’s a HEAVILY DEMOCRATIC PRECINCT. As blogger Ben Smith noted way back then, “You don’t typically intimidate your own voters.”

How was it determined that Samir Shabazz and his trusty side-kick were supporting the Democratic Party?

• Link
• Report this comment

The extremists on the Right don’t care about facts. the eye-bulging, teeth-barred nutjobs lost their minds when Obama was nominated and their heads exploded with rage when he got elected. There is nothing you can say that will calm them down.

Elections have consequences. They lost and can’t handle it. Some even have gone so far as o demand “2nd Amendment” solutions or even the overthrow of the Government by force and violence.

Why do they hate America and Democracy???

• Link
• Report this comment

I can’t imagine anyone whose first post is “Enter your comments here” had anything important to say.

• Link
• Report this comment

Hooray BLOG Intimidation! Woot woot!

• Link
• Report this comment

Ahh the stupidity continues….’Daddy are the minutemen coming to dinner…they scare me worse than the Republican wingnuts.”

You give them facts and they respond with nonsense. Another ACORN repeat….but but but…it does not fit into the agenda that the everything about Obama is against old white men like Scout

• Link
• Report this comment

Ms. Tucker, your credibiliy is on the line here. I would suggest you check yourself, and your sources for bias. You can’t defend the indefensible.

• Link
• Report this comment

And just because I am feeling froggy:
“So, no matter how many times J. Christian Adams declares that the Obama administration refuses to protect the rights of white people — and no matter how many times Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh repeat it — it’s not true.
(See my first post of the day about facts before you respond.)”

Cynthia (et. al)
Riddle me the tanning ban tax! Who does that target? Is that protecting white people’s right to remain pale?

• Link
• Report this comment

uga_b
-uhmm who wrote the legislation..oh yeah a bunch of white men. Ask them why they taxed tanning. LAst time I check the president doesn’t write laws

• Link
• Report this comment

Its not really a stretch for the GOP to blame the downgrading of the charges to a misdemeanor on Obama, after all it was a decision made only 11 days before he was sworn in. The RNC chairman just claimed that Afghanistan was a war of Obama’s choosing (Bush started that in 2001).

So by that logic, everything that happened under the Bush administration is Obama’s fault.

See how the GOP and Fox News work their magic?

• Link
• Report this comment

Last time I checked, they do advance agendas. He campaigned on it. It is referred to as OBAMACARE not BUNCHOFWHITEMEN CARE Some people can’t legitimately advance an argument or recognize humor.

I do agree with you that Obama hasn’t really done much of anything except play golf.

• Link
• Report this comment

Is there legitimately anything this man is responsible for? Not repealing the Jones Act? Stealing money from pensioners by giving GM unions favored status, thus repealing hundreds of years of financial contract law precedence? Did he at least pick out the durn dog?

• Link
• Report this comment

So, Cynthia, I assume it would be okay for the Klan to hang out, swinging ax handles, at the polls in heavily Republican areas? I mean, chances are very few people there would vote for a Democratic candidate anyway . . . .

Your routinely ludicrous, specious “logic” only serves to discredit your arguments, and is representative of the astonishing hypocrisy of the Left.

• Link
• Report this comment

CT,

You must have watched the tape of these black thugs outside of the voting precinct. You also must have listened to the sound bite of the one interviewed who said that, “I HATE WHITE PEOPLE, ALL OF THEM!!!!”. If I said those same things, I would be labeled the worst kind of racist that every posted a comment on this blog. You will never acknowledge that these thugs are the worst kind of racists around, simply because they are black and being that, they can do no wrong. Another case of selective indignation. It’s getting pretty old.

• Link
• Report this comment

Bill,
Here are the basic facts. Voter intimidation cases rarely go forward because they are hard to prove. Criminal charges require beyond a reasonable doubt versus preponderence of evidence, which is a much higher standard (think 90% v. 51%). The Bush administration as highlighted by Cynthia did not push forward with criminal charges. Civil charges, with the lower standard, were brought. The defendants did not show us resulting in a default judgment for the USA. At this point, the case is won and the government could choose to enforce fines or injunctions. They did seek an injunction on the one man with the nightstick. Under the Obama administration, they did decide to drop the cases against the remaining defendants.

None of the above is arguable or even all that relevant. What the former DOJ attorney alledged was the motive behind dropping the case. Of course this is hearsay and not admissable in court but fine for the court of public opinion. None of Cynthia’s information refutes this claim by Adams, which is unknowable by anyone except those who made the decisions. Just like their is no evidence supporting Adam’s assertions outside of the circumstances of dropping the case, which commonly happens for voter intimidation.

• Link
• Report this comment

*there. Wow

• Link
• Report this comment

Since the downgrading was Bush’s fault, Obama should make it right by filing crimimal charges immediately.

• Link
• Report this comment

How dare Obama let his Black Panther thug buddies off the hook for this…

You mean it was Bush that let them off the hook?

Well… uhh… How dare that black panther guy say bad things about white people. White people would never do that.

• Link
• Report this comment

I hope you will continue to follow this story line. Cynthia, please keep posting updates on this issue of the Bush DOJ downgrading the charges. We need to know more.

• Link
• Report this comment

I hadn’t thought about the racial context of the tanning bed tax, but it does add a new dimension. A tanning bed owner/operator should file a discrimination suit. It’s about as clear an example of discrimination based on the color of one’s skin as can be imagined. Could you see imposing a special tax on tacos, malt liquor, or really baggy pants.

Baggy pants worn with the waist below the buttocks are clearly a health hazard and have undoubtably led injuries that strain our health care system. Let’s put a $10 a pair tax on each pair of baggy shorts sold and a $200 fine on anyone caught wearing them in public.

• Link
• Report this comment

Stranger in a strange land:

You are correct sir. Those on both side of our War Between the United (oxymoron) States of America and the Confederate States of America had more in common that liberals and conservatives do now. Dark days ahead.

• Link
• Report this comment

personally, I can’t wait for the asteroid to hit and wipe out this sorry excuse of a species since the “real” Americans are too cowardly to do anything but whine.

• Link
• Report this comment

I didn’t really see a condemnation from Ms. Tucker, just excuses for the Obama administration with typical deflections pointing towards Limbaugh and Beck and a disassociation from the original Black Panther group of thugs and the new ones. Both administrations should have pressed for a case with more fervor. What a waste of a read.

• Link
• Report this comment

Oh, please…it doesn’t matter whose watch it was on, those thugs should be behind bars. Anyone who try’s to defend them is a racist.

• Link
• Report this comment

Of course the New Black Panthers would scare little conservatives into wetting their huggies, what doesn’t make them scream like French schoolgirls at the sound of a cap gun? These are the same jellyfish that were so panic stricken after 9/11 that they were ready to throw the Constitution in the shredder for anyone that claimed they could protect their candy backsides.

• Link
• Report this comment

Fact Matter- any time any where- bring your Huggies- grown very tired of tough talking bloggers. Any time any where tough guy.

• Link
• Report this comment

Yep.

• Link
• Report this comment

Everything I have read from Cynthia Tucker is such crap, and I real a lot of articles and opinions. Journalism isn’t what you do best Cynthia, I think it’s called leftist propaganda. But as an independent, you didn’t convince me to vote for a democrat, so you’ll have to try harder.

• Link
• Report this comment

Typical. A black woman defending black terrorists. Any more of this and you’re going to provoke a race war.

• Link
• Report this comment

stranger in a strange land :

Sad but probably true ……….. eventually. I hope not in my lifetime.

• Link
• Report this comment

I do not even know why Ms Tucker even try to post the truth. It just hurts some of you to know that Fox News lies.
I think most of you should just go to …..

• Link
• Report this comment

The police were called and no one was arrested. So now the police did not do their job?
If their was assults, why no arrests?
Please tell me Teabaggers how does this make sense.

BTW- Ms Tucker is not the only news group that is reporting this develpment in this story- Many news groups are reporting it today and the truth hurts does it not?

• Link
• Report this comment

As a hispanic i see things from a different perspective. Barack does not like white people. He panders to Blacks and Hispanics even when it comes to things that both parties should agree with. Like immigration and the rule of Law. An illegal immigrant comes to this country and immediately is afforded all civil rights but doesnt want all the laws to apply to them. OH….by the way. BUSH DROPPED THE CHARGES 2 WEEKS BEFORE OBAMA TOOK OFFICE. FRANKLY TIMING WAS A INTEGRAL PART OF THIS EQUATION. ALSO JUST BECAUSE BUSH DIDNT DO IT DOESNT MAKE IT RIGHT. STANDING IN FRONT OF A POLLING STATION WITH A NIGHTSTICK IS WRONG . AGREED , TUCKER ?????

• Link
• Report this comment

According to Cynthia the Clown I live in North Fulton which is 90% republican so I can intimidate any Democratic scumbag that comes around. Thanks CT for this gem.

• Link
• Report this comment

So the baggers are mad because the Bush Administration made the decision that the charges did not have merit? LMAO

• Link
• Report this comment

Since someone asked for “witnesses” , Have at it ! This a Democrat “Civil Rights” attorney that worked for Bobby & Ted Kennedy . He worked in MS during the early civil rights era ! He defended blacks against “voter intimidation” . Lets` see what this democrat poll worker says about the intimidation you are claiming didn`t happen ? The Truth Shall Set You Free ! youtube.com/watch?v=9sDoYYQdGOA

• Link
• Report this comment

Wow… Fox News Lies…THANKS CYNTHIA…for telling the truth!

• Link
• Report this comment

Let me ask you this CT, if a group of white Klansman carrying nightsticks were videotaped in front of a historically republican voting precinct, and Obama downgraded the charges a civil status, would you be OK with it?

Actually, I agree with you that it is not a big deal, but I also think it is not big deal to ask a voter to provide an ID when voting.

Go figure.

• Link
• Report this comment

Look at this JOKER. NObama is SO ONE TERM. So much for a 7-0 record.

Obama is headed for a second term.

Using his “13 Keys” formula, American University history professor Allan Lichtman has predicted that President Barack Obama will be re-elected in 2012.While former Republican House speaker and possible presidential contender Newt Gingrich has predicted that Obama has just a 20 percent chance of winning in 2012, Lichtman said that “nothing that a candidate has said or done during a campaign, when the public discounts everything as political, has changed his prospects at the polls. Debates, advertising, television appearances, news coverage and campaign strategies — the usual grist for the punditry mills — count for virtually nothing on Election Day.”

In an interview with AOL News, Lichtman said he devised his formula after studying election outcomes from 1860 to 1980 and has correctly predicted the outcomes of the last seven presidential contests. “No other system has come close to that record,” he said.

“Politicians hate the keys because you can’t manipulate them,” Lichtman said. “It’s not campaigning that counts. It’s governing that counts.”

Using the formula he laid out in his book, “Keys to the White House,” Lichtman bases his prediction on 13 conditions, or keys. When five or fewer are false, the incumbent party candidate wins. When six or more are false, the other party candidate wins.

Lichtman considers passage of health care reform a positive key for Democrats, one of nine he said that favor the incumbent party and its president. He said Obama has four keys turned against him, two short of the “fatal six negative keys” that would doom a second term. In his rating, he assumes Democrats will lose seats in Congress this fall, the economy will remain sluggish and there will be no cataclysmic setbacks in Afghanistan.

Here’s how Lichtman breaks down the keys to Obama’s political future:

• KEY 1: Party mandate. After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previous midterm elections. (FALSE)
• KEY 2: Contest. There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination. (TRUE)
• KEY 3: Incumbency. The incumbent-party candidate is the sitting president. (TRUE)
• KEY 4: Third party. There is no significant third-party or independent campaign. (TRUE)
• KEY 5: Short-term economy. The economy is not in recession during the election campaign. (TRUE)
• KEY 6: Long-term economy. Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms. (FALSE)
• KEY 7: Policy change. The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy. (TRUE)
• KEY 8: Social unrest. There is no sustained social unrest during the term. (TRUE)
• KEY 9: Scandal. The administration is untainted by major scandal. (TRUE)
• KEY 10: Foreign/military failure. The administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs. (TRUE)
• KEY 11: Foreign/military success. The administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs. (FALSE)
• KEY 12: Incumbent charisma. The incumbent-party candidate is charismatic or a national hero. (FALSE)
• KEY 13: Challenger charisma: The challenging-party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero. (TRUE)

• Link
• Report this comment

Taps !

• Link
• Report this comment

I am currently negotiating for a pay-per-view pitting the KKK against the New Black Panthers. Let these ignorant morons fight it out to the death, and leave decent people alone.

• Link
• Report this comment

Once again, you are lost.

• Link
• Report this comment

[...] Atlanta Journal Constitution – Cynthia Tucker [...]

• Link
• Report this comment

“It was clear from the beginning that this was not a case of voter intimidation against anyone who might vote for John McCain. As many observers noted on that day, no matter how badly those two New Black Panters were behaving (and the police were called and responded), it’s a HEAVILY DEMOCRATIC PRECINCT. As blogger Ben Smith noted way back then, “You don’t typically intimidate your own voters.”

Cynthia is not a mind reader. To excuse this obvious intimidation by sayng that most of the voters are Democratic is quite simply absurd. What kind of thinking is that? If 1,000 people voted at that precinct and 5% of them were republicans should those 50 people be intimidated by these bullies? What a mind boggling statement. I thought Cynthia was all about protecting the rights of minority views. Apparently the republican minority in this precinct shouldn’t have these protections because Cynthia said it is a “heavily Democratic precinct”.

As for quoting media matters I can’t believe Cytnia would stoop to quoting this far left hate site. Unbelievable. This is nothing more than a vile, one sided hate site and Cynthia thinks they should be treated credibility? Unreal.

• Link
• Report this comment

Enter your comments here

• Link
• Report this comment

Progressives (Liberal’s) cry whenever some black person’s right are being violated and rightfully so. I just cannot understand why the same people aren”t pitching a BITCH when blacks or hispanics committ crimes against white people. Racism works in all directions. I was recently appalled to hear members of the Black Panther Organization saying, “We need to kill white people and their babies”. What if someone had said we need to kill black or hispanic people and their babies? Why do we have a Ms. Black America? What would happen if white people decided to have a Ms. White America? Or for that matter, a Ms. Hispanic America. How about a WET or HET Network? How about racially dividing America in various sections based on race.

Obviously, there should be no BET or Ms. Black America. For that matter we should all refer to ourselves as AMERICANS, not African or Hispanic Americans

MAY GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
MARK A. TRAINA (Italian American) But if we go to war with Italy, shame on them cause I am a PROUD AMERICAN! I bleed Red, White and Blue through and through! (504) 231-3056

• Link
• Report this comment

Tucker has to use media matters because the AJC won’t cover it. interesting that the Soros mouthpiece is Tucker’s authority.

• Link
• Report this comment

Downgrading is a little different than dropping completely. If Bush downgraded it, it’s probably because a new President was about to take over, and it wasn’t politically tenable at the time.

However, the most interesting point here is not who downgraded the case (a different animal than dropping it), but that Cynthia is willing to defend people caught on film carrying nightsticks outside a polling precinct. Who cares if it’s a 70% Democrat area? Does that mean it’s ok to intimidate the other 30%? Cynthia, you live in a strange, whacked out world where everything must be looked at through a racial or partisan lens,

• Link
• Report this comment

Pardon me, but may I clamor now?

Hells Bells I could clamor all day

• Link
• Report this comment

I heard everybody in the Obama administration got a key ring with the Diebold Source Coding on it…..

• Link
• Report this comment

Apologies to all, in my pre-coffee stupor @ 7:00 I wrote “discrimination” when I was thinking “intimidation.”

• Link
• Report this comment

Totally peaceful Tea Party folks are called dangerous racists by democrats. The Obama adninistration turn a blind eye to black on white hate speech, which looks like racism to me. I was verbally assaulted in the steam room before the Obama election for saying I did not like Obama or McCain. I was bold enough to say only a racist would say not voting for Obama was racist. When lambasted about Bush on almost a daily basis, I told them I didn’t like Bush but I thought Gore was slightly worse and Kerry was way worse. I even explained that if I knew if there was going to be a republican congress I would have voted for Gore because neither party in full control can be trusted. My wife convinced me to not to renew my gym membership. I can only imagine what would happen at the gym if I truthfully answered a question about what I think of Obama administration so far. I would steadfastly say race has nothing to do with it unless Obama is making decisions for racial reasons, but I would still fear physical violence. If being black or white comes ahead of being American, then politicians and the folks who elect them, cannot represent everyone fairly. If Bush had behaved anywhere near as badly as Obama, Pelosi and Reid, I suspect the Tea Parties would look like Sunday School picnics in comparison to liberal hate group reaction. It seems to me democrats are nearly always unhappy about something and cannot even win with grace and dignity. Sore losers can be explained by human nature but sore winners is a difficult concept to explain. The only explanation I can think of is malcontents are never happy. My wife is so dismayed by the treatment I, a 70 year old white man, got at the gym, that she is afraid to ask for a republican ballot at a black mega-church where we vote. I keep telling her that being angry and argumentave is a far cry from physical violence.

• Link
• Report this comment

A new list of the 10 most welcoming cities to live in has just been released and each one has a black population that is essentially non-existent. Thoughts Cynthia? LOL!!!

• Link
• Report this comment

So using Cynthia’s pathetic spin, it should be just fine for a group of Klansmen to hang out in front of a polling place in the next election while holding nooses.

• Link
• Report this comment

Shocking!!! New evidence is coming out that Obama stole the primary win from Clinton. And the evidence is being complied by a Lib!!! It’s also coming out that Franken criminally stole his election as well with illegal votes from prisoners. Not that this surprises anyone, but it’ll be interesting to see if any ko.oks like Cynthia or her fellow sheep in the media touch these stories with a 10 foot pole.

• Link
• Report this comment

Solid reporting by media matters? Give me a break! Obviously no voter intimidation?! If there are men dressed in Black suits carrying clubs outside a voter precinct and you contend there isn’t any voter intimidation? You are an idiot. There is no rational conversation that can go on in your world. How the heck do you continue to have a job?

• Link
• Report this comment

ever notice how the majority of blacks in this country are in the southeast, yet the southeast is as red as you get? While the rest of the black population is spread thin throughout the rest of the country. You want to make this entire nation red? Let’s send all the blacks in the southeast to all the liberal blue states and let them live beside them and work with them for just a year’s time and then rotate them to another state. Before you know it, the entire nation will be red since they will finally know first hand what it is like to experience what we are forced to endure and suffer through on a daily basis.

• Link
• Report this comment

Why would the Bush administration prosecute them when they were leaving office in 2 months? Who in their right mind thinks that would have given them any time to do anything they would have needed to do? Its obvious CT knows absolutely nothing about anything, especially how the courts work, but the liberal writer at Media Matters is just as clueless.

• Link
• Report this comment

Someone stole my thunder above, but seriously, why do Obama defenders routinely point to comparisons to Bush? How can you invest years of your life screaming at the top of your lungs that Bush was an idiot in every facet of his leadership, and then say “well hey, Bush did it too so it’s all good?” I thought Obama was the “Chosen One” and Bush was Satin? Why would the Chosen One want to repeat the “evilness” of Bush?

• Link
• Report this comment

Racism works one-way in ctucker’s world.

• Link
• Report this comment

Cynthia, they are so filled with hate for you that you can warn them of a heavy falling object about to smack them on the head and they would spew venom at you. These people are not interested in facts; it’s all about negative emotions and not being able live down the fact that Democrats took control of both houses in 2006 and a Democratic (man of color) won the presidency in 2008. Not defending the Black Panthers, but when, in the history of this nation, did the Black Panthers ever go into any white folks homes in the middle of the night and dragged out family members and lynched them because a white man looked at a black woman in the wrong way? They don’t read your columns. They only see Cynthia Tucker as the author and immediately begin spewing venom regardless the content of the piece. Thankfully rational people from afar who read their comments realize not all Georgians are agonizing with the aflictions of these venom spewers. Heaven forbid a black woman with an opinion that does not mirror their own gets her opinion in print for the whole world to see. Be safe, my sister.

• Link
• Report this comment

…more like polyester.

I’m thinking sackcloth.

• Link
• Report this comment

If you have not noticed, there are nut jobs on both sides of the isle. You have President Bush and President Obama bashers. I would rather see an honest debate about the issues rather than what the New Black Panthers did, or what Mel Gibson said, or the other crazy items forced feed to us by the media.
However, if you are going to call it, then call it both ways. Both the right and the left news outlets focus one side of the issue, or fail to report issues… There is no journalist integrity today. I can learn more from watching the Learning or Discovery Channels.

• Link
• Report this comment

Scout. “Daddy, are those Black Panthers coming over for dinner again? They scare me.” Noooo -
Blowing up churches and killing little girls – that scary. By the way, some justice didn’t come of that case until decades later.

• Link
• Report this comment

There is no news here…making something out of nothing. Fox news has reported this accurately. They reported that this case turned into a civil case under Bush. The case was not dropped by Bush, all you liberals sit back and selectively report the “news” and look for ways to bring down Fox news. In fact, MSNBC spends more time beating up on Fox than reporting the news. You and all the liberal media outlets are the resons why everyone watches Fox-the only news outlet that reports all news-not just selected news.

• Link
• Report this comment

Where’s favorite son Jimmy Carter? He’s running all around the globe making sure stuff like this doesn’t happen. Now we have a slam dunk case in his own back yard and he completely drops the ball.

Way to defend bad behavior Cynthia. I guess next you’ll be sticking up for armed robbery because the robber really needed my stuff and it’s just not fair that I had things he wanted.

• Link
• Report this comment

Bill Tetlazff, Thr article never condemmed what they did either. Plus I don’t know of anyone who is leaving a job in 11 days to do anything. Just because one party didn’t do anything doesn’t give the other party a pass.
If this were White people doing this the Blacks would riot, and Cynthia you were correct, you would be better off not writing at all, on anything.

• Link
• Report this comment

You lost me at quotes from Media Matters.

Why not just quote The Daily Kos?

If J. Christian Adams was a Bush-admin whistleblower, you would be all over it. If the person who actually worked there has a case, let him make it without trying to undermine him before it’s determined, through an independent investigation, whether he’s right or wrong.

• Link
• Report this comment

It is amazing how we as Americans are so quick to disrtegard the facts. As Ms. Tucker states, the Bush Administration made the call to downgrade the case. This is not some attempt to blame the Bush Adminstration but rather a fact. They clearly decided there was not enough evidence to support moving forward with the case. This is not to condone their actions but we must realize that sometimes this happens in our legal system. Let’s also not disregard the fact the police were called to the polling place. I guess the New Black Panthers paid the police off. I did not read anyway in her article where she condones the actions of the Panther’s (although I do feel the comments about the precinct beiung 70% democratic irrelevant to the issue at hand).

For those who continue to blame the President for this decision and are expressing outrage, where is your outrage concerning the police officer who murdered the young man in Oakland and only received a 4 year sentence because he was convicted on a manslaughter charge? Isn’t that young man’s life just as about as the right to vote without intimidation? The legal system did not work for this young man. Our legal system is not perfect but it right more often than it is wrong.

Let’s put away the political ideology and start to examine the facts. Let’s stop simplying relying on snippets from the media that are clearly designed to promote a specific point of view. Let’s stop voting based on the endorsement of some elected leader. Let’s research and read the complete set of facts and then engage in healthy debate.

• Link
• Report this comment

Has anyone heard who or what group planted the bomb for a big oil executive’s wife. She is 62yrs old and had a bomb explod in her face. The bomb was reported as having nails in it and some struck her face. I do not believe this is the Tea Party work! I do believe this is a progressive liberal wacho’s work. It must be because the big three medias are not doing much investigative reporting. The progressive liberals are violate. It has been in their entire history. So do not let the progressive liberals point fingers at the Tea Party or other conservative groups without a direct challange with the facts.

• Link
• Report this comment

Cynthia, the Holder DOJ dropped the case in May 2009. You are so misleading with your summary of the “facts”. How do you keep your job?

• Link
• Report this comment

I say, Kill the crackers!

• Link
• Report this comment

Russ

May 2009: DOJ obtained default judgment against Shabazz for carrying weapon outside polling station. On May 18, 2009, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entered default judgment against Samir Shabazz.

That’s how it dropped…..

• Link
• Report this comment

CT, thanks for doing the piece, bravo.I don’t see the facts as being bullet proof and as an intelligent person would not expect you not to have a left leaning opinion.
This is the sad part…I had high hopes that this president Would bring people together and he has failed miserably. I grew up on a military base and in the black community in the south during the sixties and seventies. I’ve seen everything good and bad about both cultures and I have never seen a more polarized state of affairs than now.
I dislike this administration because it has done nothing short of bold face lying and using race and the lack of objective dissemination of facts to further an obvious statist progressive agenda. There are people now who have CLEARLY seen this as dangerous to the fabric of our country and are in the motions of correcting this. They are NOT all Right wing, wing nut, neo-con Republicans they are a mixture of former Democrats and moderates and conservatives that see through the baseless and empty rhetoric this President is only capable of.
It is on the backs and brains of the white and black races that created this country ( Yes I know about all the others, think percentage) and we have been successfully divided and conquered . I personally don’t know one republican or conservative who was willing to follow G. Bush on all his policies blindly, but I see the left now as robots like the ones in I-Robot following Obama like lemmings off a cliff.
As Yamamoto was once to have said ” I believe we have awakened a sleeping giant”.
The good and the free of this country will not stand for much more and much to my dismay the left just keeps on adding more fuel.
“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty” T. Jefferson.

• Link
• Report this comment

Granny – yup dropped
When none of the defendants filed any response to the complaint or appeared in federal district court in Philadelphia to answer the suit, it appeared almost certain Justice would have prevailed by default. Instead, the department in May suddenly allowed the Black Panther party and two of the three defendants to walk away. Against the third defendant, Minister King Samir Shabazz, it sought only an injunction barring him from displaying a weapon within 100 feet of a Philadelphia polling place for the next three years—action that’s already illegal under existing law. Quite a judgment Granny! Now Samir can go ply his wares at any polling place except in Philadelphia. I am sure he learned a lesson.

• Link
• Report this comment

Can somebody please tell me why the DOJ dropped the charges after the defendants were found guilty by default? The case was won, so what were they thinking?

• Link
• Report this comment

Russ

AGAIN….nobody NOBODY alleged intimidation.

Perhaps the case should not have been brought to the bar at all.

Perhaps in doing so the Bush DOJ was being hyper partisan/borderline racist?

• Link
• Report this comment

Come on Granny – no one alleged intimidation? What kind of argument is that in the face of the videos and recent statements from the Party itself?

• Link
• Report this comment

Russ

The correct argument. No one alleged intimidation.

Repeat No One.

• Link
• Report this comment

[...] [...]

• Link
• Report this comment

Big D

I saw that early this morning.

Did you happen to notice that the same poll shows the numbers for the GOP even worse than that?

• Link
• Report this comment

CT: Let’s say we had a Republican-heavy polling place. And the KKK picketed. Would the Justice Dept ignore it? Hmmmm?

• Link
• Report this comment

Granny Godzilla,

Surely you recognize that victims of intimidation crimes/civil violations are relatively unlikely to report to law enforcement for the same reason they are a victim in the first place: they are, in fact, intimidated. it’s often not worth the trouble for any one voter, who must then continue to live in the neighborhood and risk further harrassment for reporting.

be clear on one thing, at least: the allegation under review by the civil rights commission has nothing at all to do w/ the decision to not pursue criminal charges, but only whether a decision to not seek more apt, harsher civil penatlies (fines) was made on an improper basis. this decision was made in the spring of ‘09, not on the date the complaint for injunctive relief was filed.

ms. tucker has reframed the issue to produce an easier resolution, more favorable to an administration she supports, by selectively citing the testimony of one asst attorney general who avoided speaking to the primary issue at hand. she also incorrectly referred to him as a “bush appointee” when, in actuality, he’s not a political appointee at all; convenient mistake?

personally, i don’t think there’s anything to it; but to say that it has been dispositively resolved by the testimony and editorials she cites to is dishonest, to say the least.

• Link
• Report this comment

Big D

You are correct, the GOP is not in control (except for that whole tyranny of the minority and unprecedented use of filibsuters silliness)

However, I think the GOP’s approval ratings being lower than Obama’s
may mean they won’t get the votes you think they’ll get.

• Link
• Report this comment

smithers
July 13th, 2010
9:40 am

I say, Kill the crackers!

Do you really want a race war? If so, when was the last time whitey lost one?

• Link
• Report this comment

Josh: Caps lock key. Find it.

• Link
• Report this comment

The Bush administration filed the case in 2009. Holder ordered the case dismissed in 2010.

• Link
• Report this comment

You know you’ve lost all credibility when you start trying to pass off reporting from far left hate sites like Media Matters and the American Prospect as legitimate news sources.

And since when is it okay to intimidate the minority of republican voters in a heavily democratic precinct simply because the precinct is heavily democratic? That has got to be one of the dumbest editorial statements I’ve ever read.

• Link
• Report this comment

It is easier to get a conviction on a Civil case than a Criminal case. The standards are different. For example, Simpson got off on Criminal Charges, but got convicted on civil charges – just for an unrelated example. So, to say or infer that Bush dropped charges, as Olberman reported last night, is a complete distortion. You didn’t mention that the DOJ WON the Civil case, but dropped pursuing the case before sentencing. Maybe I missed that? More distortion and lies from the left.

• Link
• Report this comment

From the liveleak article I posted @ 10:24 AM

“In January, the Justice Department filed a civil complaint in Philadelphia against the New Black Panther Party after two of its members in black berets, black combat boots, black shirts and black jackets purportedly intimidated voters with racial insults, slurs and a nightstick. A third party member was accused of managing, directing and endorsing their behavior. The incident was captured on videotape.”

“Four months later, the Justice Department dropped the charges…”

“Before the charges were dropped, a federal judge in April had ordered default judgments against the Panthers after they refused to respond to the charges or appear in court. The Justice Department also was in the final stages of seeking sanctions when a delay in the proceedings was ordered by Loretta King, acting assistant attorney general.”

• Link
• Report this comment

Liberals can not lead and do not know how to follow. That is a train wreck!

• Link
• Report this comment

The black panthers are a joke! They hide behind laws that protect them from whites because they are black. That gives them courage to do and say things from a cowardly platform. If whitey bitch slaps one then Holder would prosecute whitey with exteme prejudice.

• Link
• Report this comment

Cynthia, was Sotamayor not championed due to her race? No president shines away from race; this one is no different.

I have yet to see anyone prove how not pursuing a criminal case but pursuing the civil case somehow supports the dropping of charges already won. I have yet to see anything to refute that the case could have been dropped by the Civil Rights attorneys due to race. The fact someone who knows libel laws pretty well wouuld come out is pretty interesting. However, it is all hearsay and conjecture at this point.

Just be happy we have something to take our minds off Obama’s mishandling of the economy and oil cleanup. FoxNews is doing him a favor.

• Link
• Report this comment

Malik Shabazz would have loved it when I took his night stick from him and used it for a dildo on him! This man is a registered idiot and should have been procecuted for hate crimes! But, I guess the long worn out race card only applies to white people! This man sings the praises of Osama Bin Laden, also!

• Link
• Report this comment

Just remember, there is Cynthia’s truth, the conservative truth, and, somewhere in the middle, the real truth.

• Link
• Report this comment

It is quite apparent that a large number of your “conservatve” readers(though at times astonishing they pocess the ability to read) are Haters of the first order.

• Link
• Report this comment

the honorable el-hajj malik el-shabazz is better known as malcolm x. this malik shabazz is not the same person and they do not come from the same culture, history, or religion. malcolm x was an activitist for the advancement of blacks and other oppressed peoples (after his trip from mecca).

this malik shabazz is… well, i don’t know.

• Link
• Report this comment

finally, the first black panther party used california’s laws to its advantage. that is reason why the organization openly carried fierearms–even into the state capital–until governor reagan had the laws changed. the new black panther party is in no way, shape, form, or fashion anywhere what the original party was.

enough on the history lessons.

• Link
• Report this comment

The haters are out in full swing. They have tried every propaganda to discredit the black community, such as, welfare, abortion, christianity, ignorance, stealing jobs, unamerican, country back, van jones, black panthers, and the list goes on.

It is a shame–what these so called christians will do to hide their racism. The congress man, republican community, fox news have all use polarization to destroy a nation. They will go after puerto ricans, mexicans, blacks and soon asians and others who do not follow what they preach until they have their world back.

• Link
• Report this comment

WideAwake

July 13th, 2010
12:31 pm
“They have tried every propaganda to discredit the black community”

Nope! There is enough in the black community to do it (like CT) there is no need for whites to get involved except to say they see it.

• Link
• Report this comment

Just like you people show yourselves for what you truly are….

• Link
• Report this comment

Joan, shutup. Did anyone face prosecution for comments? No. Stop making discussions and arguments a freedom of speech issue. If you had any brains at all, you might just be able to figure out that the ability to freely comment on these discussion is the result of free speech.

• Link
• Report this comment

Listening to these Right Wingers on this board you like Nath are no different than some of the White South Africans who are complaining about their lost as being they privilege statics.

• Link
• Report this comment

Cynthia, you made foxnews during lunch by the way. Megyn Kelly then shouted down one of her guests, which I think indicates to me she has gotten defensive over all the criticism.

• Link
• Report this comment

1. The DOJ received clearance to move ahead with injunctions against 2 members of the NBPP and 1 against the party itself. The case was over and won on a default judgement since no members of the NBPP decided to show up to court to answer the charge. Therefore any BS about them not having enough evidence to move forward was just that, BS. Why do you need need more less or any evidence after the verdict has been given. 2. Once the DOJ learned of the verdict they then downgraded the punishment by eliminating 2 of the injunctions and reducing the severity of the third snatching defeat from the jaws of victory as many have said. 3. I am sure Ms. Tucker would be fine if the tables were turned with the idiot Klan doing the exact same thing in a majority Conservative district and I hope that she will be on “This Week” this Sunday to say so, so that we may all hear it for ourselves. If she does that I will obviously be dubious but at least she has the courage to be consistent when it is not an easy thing to do. Show some character Ms. Tucker.

• Link
• Report this comment

So it was decided “criminal” charges would be downgraded to “civil”. That isn’t the issue. In a nutshell:
11/4/08 NBPP Voter Intimidation in PA
1/07/09 DOJ Files Lawsuit Against NBPP
4/20/09 Court enters default judgement against NBPP, (defendants were a no-show in court)
5/15/09 Obama Admininstration Moves to Dismiss Charges Against NBPP
6/8/09-11/10/09 Three Letters Sent to Attorney General Holder on the case…no response
As reported during interview on America Live with Megyn Kelly with Former DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams, yes (gasp) on the Fox News Channel.

• Link
• Report this comment

Oh now you did it Linda. Confusing the whole thing by bringing more facts into it.;)

• Link
• Report this comment

uga_b,

If they feel that they are put in indefensible positions then why do they go on? Kirsten has been a long time member of the Fox News Team and understands the nuances associated with debate. Step 1, have the facts straight. She did not so she got rocked. We are reaching an asymptotic point where so much indefensible behavior is going on by many, not all or probably even most, on the left that they have no way to defend all of it. You can only keep knocking a pile of stuff down for so long until it becomes too high.

• Link
• Report this comment

I will however give her kudos for at least having the courage to discuss this issue unlike so many in the “Main Stream Media”.

• Link
• Report this comment

The Justice Department is saying the facts don’t support the allegations. But they won’t explain what facts don’t support the allegations. We have Black Panthers strutting around a polling place with nightsticks allegedly expressing racial slurs towards white people. Is that true or not? If it’s true, then the civil judgement should not have been dropped. If it’s not true, then where’s the evidence? I’ve yet to see anyone say that there were not Black Panthers strutting around a polling place with nightsticks allegedly expressing racial slurs towards white people. I’ve heard plenty of excuses made for them, for various reasons like “But they’re black!” or “They’re Democrats” but no refutation of the basic facts.

Next election I’m going to dress up in paramilitary clothes and carry a nightstick and yell threatening racial slurs at black people at my local precinct. Somehow I have the feeling I’ll end up in jail, while these jokes got less than a slap on the wrist, and people like Cynthia are lining up to defend them.

• Link
• Report this comment

One of the posters would have the KKK and the Black Panther Party fight it out to the death. Who would step in to fill up the void. Yep, none other than the Aryan Brotherhood. Think the National Guard or any of these Christian(child,just put it in the hands of Jesus)preachers, liberals and conservatives(some of my best friends are black)is going to be a buffer to these fanatics, guess again. It has been stated that the NAACP and other organizations were defunct. Then I believe the theory also applies to: Moral Majority, Promisekeepers and the Christian Coalition. Mark A. Traina, there already is a Miss America and from its inception up to the time Vanessa Williams was crowned the pageant was lily white. One can go to an Ayran website and find remarks about killing blacks, hispanics, jews along with their babies. No other group would be around except for the blond blue eyes. America is divided by markets on television, home shopping channel, lifetime channel catering mostly to women, country music channel, etc. The era of bland, predominately white television program being foisted upon other ethnic groups in this country is over. No matter how hard one tries, ain’t no going back. Nothing nostalgic about those days at all, everybody will not be sanitizing their history books like Texas.

• Link
• Report this comment

So, Media Matters is a credible source? That puts this version in doubt automatically.

• Link
• Report this comment

Enter your comments here

• Link
• Report this comment

Para-military garb, nightclubs, kkk hoods..what’s the differance? I found the film intimitating. They would have had to use force to stop me, personally. But how many people walked by, or may hesitate to vote next time? Anybody who thinks this is not morally wrong has a sad heart. I live in an integrated area and happily see the mixture. I don’t care if my children marry white, black, red, yellow, etc.etc. People are people. And I love everybody, by the Golden Rule, even if sometimes it can be a sheer determination of the will. This type of threat, white or black, is sickening to me. I easily love Martin Luther King Jr. Does that make me white or black. Where is God? Where is Love in all this? A stone heart is not a good thing. There is no room in it for empathy or compassion. It’s hard, empty of life, it is dead. This behavior is disgusting. Anyone who believes it to be fine is not aware of the loving strength of individuality, and that all people are created equal. I’m just a man who tries to look up to everyone. Nobody special.

• Link
• Report this comment

Ctucker @ 5:08 – She threatened to cut the mike off because Kirsten was not allowing her, Megyn, to interact with her, Kirsten, and move the discussion forward.

Ctucker @ 5:10 – Tell that to Bartel Bull. If you do not know of which I speak let me know and I will hook you up with the facts. If you do know then you are being intellectually dishonest in my opinion.

Ctucker @ 5:11 – Here is the truth the Bush Admin downgraded it to a Civil. The Obama/Holder DOJ manged to get 3 injunctions. The Obama/Holder DOJ then decided to drop 2 of the injunctions and downgrade the third for no discernible reason. The reason they offered was complete and utter BS. The Obama DOJ then put out a directive, according to Adams, that no cases where the def is black and the plaintiff is white will be moved on. They will remain unadressed or dropped altogether.

Ctucker @ 5:45 Once again there were complaints filed by several including a black poll watcher and Bartel Bull who is not in any way close to a conservative. Only as close as RFK was anyway. Also, you don’t need evidence to carry out a sentence once the verdict has been handed down.

I hope that you will let me know when if you will be on “This Week” this Sunday or not. If so I hope that you have the courage to bring this up although I doubt George Will has the intestinal fortitude to truly debate this subject as it should.

Once again, I do think that you show a lot of character in responding to this issue. I think that it would show a lot more if you were to bring it up in a forum where your direct interaction is more likely.

• Link
• Report this comment

Tucker even block quoted a statement making it clear Perez, the testifying witness she refers to as a Bush appointee, preceded even Obama by a substantial amount of time: “ . . . and about nine months before Thomas Perez was confirmed as head of the Civil Rights Division.”

Not only is that embarrassingly sloppy, it’s a pretty good demonstration of how ideological predisposition complicates even the most straightforward of facts for some people (e.g., the author of this editorial). Start with a conclusion, then secure the factual support, right? I tend to agree with this lady as much as not on matters of pure opinion—but factual distortions and inaccuracies that lend support to positions make journalists like this (and Rush, Hannity, Maddow, etc.) utterly abhorrent.

• Link
• Report this comment

“The Obama administration sought and got an injunction against the guy with the club.”

Then they dropped the case Ctucker. You’re the last person to comment on anyone “getting their facts straight”. Speaking of which you still have not corrected the record when you said “She (Aunt Zeituni) never ignored the deportation order.”

• Link
• Report this comment

“This means that the case was downgraded to a civil case 11 days before Obama was inaugurated, 26 days before Eric Holder became attorney general, and about nine months before Thomas Perez was confirmed as head of the Civil Rights Division”

Merely because a civil action as opposed to a criminal action was filed against the defendants on Jan 7 2009 under the Bush DOJ did not preclude the filing of criminal charges later. Indeed, the Bush DOJ got the ball rolling on this case. So, it was in fact the Obama DOJ that both “downgraded” the injuctions and spiked the effort against the New Black Panthers, for those who find facts a useful foundation on which to form one’s judgment.

• Link
• Report this comment

Ctucker @ 7:59 – Then why have they not been denounced by the NAACP? Doesn’t the NAACP have a history of condemning those with outwardly racist views? Does the NBPP Advance the efforts of Colored People?

• Link
• Report this comment

ctucker @ 7:54 I think that is a bit of the pot calling the kettle black.

• Link
• Report this comment

Ctucker @ 8:28 I am not the one to decide what penalty should apply. My point is that there was no reason for the penalties to be downgraded. If you believe that they were downgraded for good reason I would like to hear those reasons. It was not as the DOJ said “lack of evidence to move forward with the case”. That is a pure canard. The case was already determined by a court of law. So then why were the charges downgraded?

• Link
• Report this comment

Dan Priem – I misspoke, I meant to say the penalties were downgraded.

• Link
• Report this comment

Rereading C Tucker’s talking points, the word flabbergasted doesn’t do my mind justice to her contention that essentially it couldn’t have been intimidation because it was a liberal district anyway. CT, your sense of justice is all wrong. You have to stop making excuses for unlawful behavior, bad characters, dangerous situations and illegal actions simply because the violator is liberal, black, socialist or fascist. Honestly, I’ve seen more coverage and TV chatter of Mel Gibson than of these New Black Panther guys.

• Link
• Report this comment

Megyn Kelly was over the top in the video. But I started my career as an SEC Enforcement attorney in the late 1960s. At the time the SEC obtained injunctions to restrin a defendant from selling the same company’s stock without registration or fraud. /during my tenure at the SEC, injunctions became broader applying to “any other seciruty.” Here the DOJ got an “any other poliing place remedy forever. The DOJ won by default. So the Holder DOJ takes a meaningful injunction vs people as abhoren as any Nazi or Klansman and (i) for the lead defendant narrows it to make it almost meaningless and (ii) as to the other defendants dismissed the case. The real question is why? The case was over. The smell of politics is palpable.

• Link
• Report this comment

If the case is so egregious why not get criminal charges?

• Link
• Report this comment

Jojo @ 10:25 – Criminal charges were filed initially then reduced by the Bush DOJ as I understand it. I am not sure of the motivation behind that. Some have said that it was because it is easier to prosecute a Civil case rather than a criminal one.

• Link
• Report this comment

C, I’m no lawyer, but this intimidation was real. It was a case of assault. Not battery, but assault. What more evidence is needed? The video alone, I thought was scarry. There was terror! And this type of thing should not be done or copied. My God in heaven, what a terrible portrayal of human rights. And it’s in America. We only possess someone in as much as they love us. This is not winning hearts and minds. It is poisoning them. Whether or not one is for or against these men, it is poison for all. As far as a penalty goes, how about, if any actions of the like are done again, anywhere and anytime, (not just for two years in one city), assault charges be given with due process. Put the charge up with other assault charges, and penalize accordingly. There’s nothing harsh in this. This warning would be for anybody at any voting poll. Anybody. The man in the video, I would say was ‘raising a bit of Cain.’ By the way, C, thanks for writing me back. Peace. Rick assault n.) An apparently violent attempt, or willful offer with force or violence, to do hurt to another; an attempt or offer to beat another, accompanied by a degree of violence, but without touching his person, as by lifting the fist, or a cane, in a threatening manner, or by striking at him, and missing him. If the blow aimed takes effect, it is a battery.

• Link
• Report this comment

You are right Cynthia, Kirsten can’t think for herself, since she’s only reciting DailyKos/Michael Moore type propaganda. A. The guy had a WEAPON in front of a polling location. B. The young man that made the video SAID it was intimidating. C. The man is a proven RACIST that incites hatred and MURDERING of white people and their BABIES.

The case was filed during Bush’s presidency and then it was dropped by Eric Holder. You Mrs, are one of the most dishonest, bigoted, dangerous people in America.

• Link
• Report this comment

hahahahahaha!!!!!! Megyn straight handed that Commie her lunch!!! Kristen is dumber than dirt and was clearly grasping for straws!!! Love it!!!

• Link
• Report this comment

You should retract this article. By making one phone call, you could have discovered that career attorney Mark Kappelhoff, chief of the criminal section, made the decision to not pursue criminal action. Kappelhoff is a longtime democratic donor and was appointed to a political position by Obama immediately after inauguration. Maybe it was a reward for helping sweep this under the rug. You should feel shame for your part in promoting disinformation.

• Link
• Report this comment

This “downgrade” talking point is apparently supposed to excuse the Obama administration’s decision to dismiss virtually the entire civil voter intimidation case and to neuter the injunction sought against the one remaining defendant so substantially that what was left was little more than a minor annoyance.

These claims by a nonlawyer betray a fundamental ignorance of the difference between civil and criminal prosecutions and a total misunderstanding of how things work at the Justice Department and the Civil Rights Division. First of all, although the Civil Rights Division has a Criminal Section, the vast majority of its voting-rights prosecutions are civil cases conducted by the division’s Voting Section. Whenever someone violates the Voting Rights Act and does so in a way that is potentially both a civil and a criminal violation, the division must decide whether to proceed first with a civil or a criminal case. With most voting cases, the decision is usually to go with a civil case, particularly if there are elections coming up in the near future. That is because civil cases have a lower burden of proof and give the government the opportunity to obtain almost immediately a temporary injunction to stop the defendants from engaging in the same wrongful behavior as the case winds its way through the federal courts.

Criminal cases can take longer to develop, particularly since the government usually has to convene a federal grand jury to return an indictment. Also, criminal cases focus like a laser beam on individual defendants, whereas civil cases can include an organizational defendant (like the NBPP).

The focus for the Civil Rights Division is always on the best way to get the remedy that is needed to stop and prevent the recurrence of the voter intimidation or other wrongful behavior as soon as possible. In this particular case, when the decision was being made in January of 2009, the division knew there was going to be another election in May in Philadelphia. The fastest to way to make sure there would be no thugs in paramilitary uniforms and jackboots smacking batons into their fists at polling places in the upcoming election was to file a civil complaint and obtain a restraining order against the individual defendants and the New Black Panther Party. In fact, one of the defendants dismissed from the case was once again credentialed as a Democratic poll watcher in the May election.

Once the division obtained a judgment and an injunction in the civil case, they could have decided to further pursue a criminal prosecution against the individual New Black Panthers, but the number one priority had to be getting a civil injunction as expeditiously as possible before the next election.

• Link
• Report this comment

After reading the blog post and the comments below, I am reminded of Dr. King’s quote:
“Nothing pains some people more than having to think”.

• Link
• Report this comment

Ms. Tucker, Please read the Civil Rights Commission investigation on this. One of the two men was charged and jailed (the one carrying the club) the other left between 9:30 and 10:00 AM and it was deemed there was insufficient evidence to prosecute him. Obama DOJ declined to proceed with the civil action. Check your facts.

• Link
• Report this comment

Ms. Tucker, I really don’t care what race someone is or what party they support, if you stand outside of a polling place in a paramilitary uniform waving a nightstick around you are in the wrong. What about that is so hard to understand?

• Link
• Report this comment

Personally Ms. Tucker, I don’t think the case should’ve been narrowed to include only the individual carrying the nightstick. But, that’s a judgement call with many legal and political implications. If your stance is that the injunction against the one man is sufficient, that’s a perfectly reasonable position to take. My disagreement with your post here is that you stated that this controvesy should be put to rest because the DOJ under Bush downgraded the criminal charges to civil ones. That has no bearing on how Eric Holder handled the civil case. For the record, I think going after Holder for this, of all issues, is a mistake by conservatives. I think there are many more bigger issues to go after Holder about. But, that’s for another day. Thanks for responding Ms. Tucker.

• Link
• Report this comment

One word for you, HYPOCRYTE!! Just like all left leaning loons.

• Link
• Report this comment

How do people who are illiterate operate computers?

• Link
• Report this comment

Cynthia: Re Candor About Racism:
It isn’t racism when you hire your friends or relatives over better qualified applicants. This isn’t always small scale either. I became the personal friend of the personnel manager of a billion dollar corporation. One of his problems was to re-balance the religious diversity of the institution because his predecessor had hired Catholics by preference. My father worked for a billion dollar corporation whose open policy was to consider the relatives of employees first. In both cases, the motivation would be sticking with what you understood best. Hiring human beings isn’t simply a matter of who got the highest grades from the best schools or indeed who has the biggest muscles, In past years the FBI liked to hire Catholics because they tended to respect hierarchy and be loyal not because they were white. If your father and uncles show up sober for work every day it’s likely you will too. I would think both of these motivations would have a negative effect on the hiring of minorities but it’s not racism even with a small r. Is it fair? Yes, because in a sense the successful applicant has a letter of recommendation from a respected source that the passed over applicant doesn’t have and in this sense the successful candidate has better credentials.

• Link
• Report this comment

My guess is that the Bush DOJ thought that the civil case would be the fastest and easiest way to get a conviction because the burden of proof is much lower. My question is if two tea party members were standing in front of a 100% white polling place with night sticks, would you be blowing that off and making excuses for them?

• Link
• Report this comment

Cynthia, What good is the injunction. The man with the club has a temporary ban from violating the law in Philadelphia. So he will go to Camden. Please respond to my earlier email about how meaningless it is in contrast to what the court entered before politics got in the way.

• Link
• Report this comment