<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recreation for wingnuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/</link>
	<description>Political commentary from Pulitzer Prize winner Cynthia Tucker of The AJC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:30:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-2/#comment-11418</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11418</guid>
		<description>Cynthia, It&#039;s amazing.  Many of the people who comment about your column seem to not like you or what you write.  So why are they reading it?  It&#039;s one thing if they disagree with some of the things you publish, but it seems to be more than that.  If they really feel this strongly about what you write, then they should stop reading it.  Many of the things they complain about you can be said about Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, and Anne Coulter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia, It&#8217;s amazing.  Many of the people who comment about your column seem to not like you or what you write.  So why are they reading it?  It&#8217;s one thing if they disagree with some of the things you publish, but it seems to be more than that.  If they really feel this strongly about what you write, then they should stop reading it.  Many of the things they complain about you can be said about Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Glen Beck, and Anne Coulter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saywhat?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-2/#comment-11371</link>
		<dc:creator>saywhat?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11371</guid>
		<description>Ha Ha! The wingnuts have all their panties in a bunch over being called wingnuts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Ha! The wingnuts have all their panties in a bunch over being called wingnuts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-1/#comment-11048</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11048</guid>
		<description>Also in that poll, did you notice that 52% of those polled DO NOT support Obama&#039;s healthcare reform while 40% do.  Cynthia, how come you won&#039;t discuss that number?  Again, you only cite sources when it benefits you and your mixed up agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also in that poll, did you notice that 52% of those polled DO NOT support Obama&#8217;s healthcare reform while 40% do.  Cynthia, how come you won&#8217;t discuss that number?  Again, you only cite sources when it benefits you and your mixed up agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-1/#comment-11046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11046</guid>
		<description>The poll you refer to stating 52% of republicans think Obama&#039;s presidency was stolen for him by ACORN is the worst kind of misleading poll.

The question asked was,do you think Obama won the election legitimately, or do you think ACORN stole it for him. There were only two acceptable answers. If you say it was legit then you are basically saying you think ACORN did no wrong. The only way one could express the sentiment that ACORN was doing something wrong was to say he did not win legitimatlly.

The responses were a condemnation of ACORN, not Obama. Had the question simply been Do you think Obama&#039;s election was legitimate, you would have gotten an entirely different set of numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poll you refer to stating 52% of republicans think Obama&#8217;s presidency was stolen for him by ACORN is the worst kind of misleading poll.</p>
<p>The question asked was,do you think Obama won the election legitimately, or do you think ACORN stole it for him. There were only two acceptable answers. If you say it was legit then you are basically saying you think ACORN did no wrong. The only way one could express the sentiment that ACORN was doing something wrong was to say he did not win legitimatlly.</p>
<p>The responses were a condemnation of ACORN, not Obama. Had the question simply been Do you think Obama&#8217;s election was legitimate, you would have gotten an entirely different set of numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-1/#comment-11045</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11045</guid>
		<description>To El Jefe:

Sorry ........ these two get me back in ........... :o



Blessed are those who mourn (for what my country has become under liberals), 
      for they will be comforted. 
 
 Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness (fighting against the slaughter of our unborn children), 
      for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To El Jefe:</p>
<p>Sorry &#8230;&#8230;.. these two get me back in &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. <img src='http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Blessed are those who mourn (for what my country has become under liberals),<br />
      for they will be comforted. </p>
<p> Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness (fighting against the slaughter of our unborn children),<br />
      for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-1/#comment-11037</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11037</guid>
		<description>Cynthia, we have a new game for libs.  Go on MSNBC without any credibility, go out to a rally for a Conservative politician, find a teenage girl in the crowd and grill her using incorrect information that you maintain on a note card.  That sounds right up the typical liberal&#039;s alley.  Did Nora go to the Cynthia Tucker School of Journalism?  What a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia, we have a new game for libs.  Go on MSNBC without any credibility, go out to a rally for a Conservative politician, find a teenage girl in the crowd and grill her using incorrect information that you maintain on a note card.  That sounds right up the typical liberal&#8217;s alley.  Did Nora go to the Cynthia Tucker School of Journalism?  What a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Jefe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-1/#comment-11033</link>
		<dc:creator>El Jefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11033</guid>
		<description>Common Sense,

Hence the &quot;very benevolent dictator&quot;.
God answers to no one but himself.

How else do you deal with an all powerful Deity except to admit you fall short of His expectations? 

Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.(sorry progressives, this leaves you out)
Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. (sorry progressives, this leaves you out also)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Common Sense,</p>
<p>Hence the &#8220;very benevolent dictator&#8221;.<br />
God answers to no one but himself.</p>
<p>How else do you deal with an all powerful Deity except to admit you fall short of His expectations? </p>
<p>Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.(sorry progressives, this leaves you out)<br />
Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. (sorry progressives, this leaves you out also)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Jefe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-1/#comment-11030</link>
		<dc:creator>El Jefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11030</guid>
		<description>Wally,

So much anger coming from the progressives. Why is that, are you not the party of tolerance and open-mindedness?

Here we have another example where the progressives are intolerant and very closed minded about the issues. They fly off the handle and refuse to debate.

Instead of attacking the issues, they attack anyone that has a brain and wants to discuss HealthCare.

How typical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wally,</p>
<p>So much anger coming from the progressives. Why is that, are you not the party of tolerance and open-mindedness?</p>
<p>Here we have another example where the progressives are intolerant and very closed minded about the issues. They fly off the handle and refuse to debate.</p>
<p>Instead of attacking the issues, they attack anyone that has a brain and wants to discuss HealthCare.</p>
<p>How typical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peadawg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-1/#comment-11022</link>
		<dc:creator>Peadawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11022</guid>
		<description>Cynthia, you answer someone else&#039;s question, why not mine?  Or do you just answer question that you have a logical answer to?  You can&#039;t think of a good answer to mine, can you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia, you answer someone else&#8217;s question, why not mine?  Or do you just answer question that you have a logical answer to?  You can&#8217;t think of a good answer to mine, can you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2009/11/20/recreation-for-wingnuts/comment-page-1/#comment-11021</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/?p=4126#comment-11021</guid>
		<description>Ms. Tucker,

Yes maam, I suppose I am a wingnut based on the blogosphere&#039;s usual usage of the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Tucker,</p>
<p>Yes maam, I suppose I am a wingnut based on the blogosphere&#8217;s usual usage of the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
