They were wrong about Medicare, too

Nicholas Kristof has a great column today on the critics of health care reform and how their criticisms about the dire consequences — socialism! government takeover! — are wrong. How does he know? It’s all been said before. Read his column or just go straight to an audio tape of Ronald Reagan blasting the proposed  Medicare plan in 1961.

Reagan was wrong, too.

If you don’t (oppose it), this program I promise you, will pass just as surely as the sun will come up tomorrow and behind it will come other federal programs that will invade every area of freedom as we have known it in this country until one day as Normal Thomas said we will wake to find that we have socialism, and if you don’t do this and I don’t do this, one of these days we are going to spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free.

Medicare is now so popular that no politician dares talk about trying to change it. That included Reagan, who, when he ran for president, wanted voters to forget his earlier opposition to Medicare.

104 comments Add your comment

MedicareSucks

November 19th, 2009
12:25 pm

Medicare’s also has an unprecedented amount of wasteful spending and lack of government oversight, making it a boondogle, to say the least. If you think Medicare is fantastic, I will expect you, Cynthia, to be the first to sign up for the goverment-run public plan that is being touted by the libs. It’s easy to talk to the talk, but I’m anxious to see if you can step up and walk the walk, which I doubt.

Road Scholar

November 19th, 2009
12:32 pm

MS: And who is resposible for the wasteful spending? Could it be the doctors that request unneeded tests, or who overcharge for their services, or……

While government isn’t innocent, let’s look at the root of the problem. GREED! Without competition, costs will continue to skyrocket. Is this your idea of letting the free market set the rates?

dave

November 19th, 2009
12:35 pm

Wait, read that excerpt again… Reagan was wrong???

Steve

November 19th, 2009
12:39 pm

Medicare Sucks,
I agree with you; however, the members of Congress are who I want to see be REQUIRED BY LAW to use whatever form of Health Reform they pass.

The American People

November 19th, 2009
12:50 pm

“Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” – President Obama.

To achieve health care reform, “I’m going to have all the negotiations around a big table. We’ll have doctors and nurses and hospital administrators. Insurance companies, drug companies — they’ll get a seat at the table, they just won’t be able to buy every chair. But what we will do is, we’ll have the negotiations televised on C-SPAN, so that people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents, and who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies. And so, that approach, I think is what is going to allow people to stay involved in this process.” – President Obama.

What a guy. What a guy.

Chris Broe

November 19th, 2009
12:53 pm

Reagan looks and sounds sensational. You can practically smell the twenty mule team just off camera.

However, we have gone further down the socialist path since Reagan. This video, and the accompanying article only supports the nay sayers.

Tax rates are a disgrace. Nannys rule primetime. Infomercials mostly bray about free money from Obama’s bailout/stimulus package.
.

The whole country is filled with commie jackasses……

mike

November 19th, 2009
1:03 pm

Too bad Kristof chose to ignore the real criticism made of this bill: it will bankrupt us. Tucker also missed this crucial point when she was mindlessly regurgitating someone else’s work.

Oh and by the way, Medicare is already bankrupting us and if anyone was on record as having said so in 1960, they would have been dead right.

I think it is great that the left completely refuses to acknowledge the fiscal concerns that are really driving opposition to this bill.

Jake

November 19th, 2009
1:15 pm

They were wrong about Medicare in 1961. Especially in one really big area. They said it would never cost more tham $100M a year!!!!

mike

November 19th, 2009
1:22 pm

Road Scholar –

“Could it be the doctors that request unneeded tests, or who overcharge for their services, or……”

The unneeded tests are a direct result of the lawsuits that the Democrats refuse to curtail with tort reform. If you really cared about unneeded tests you would be demanding that Democrats stop working for the interests of trial lawyers and start implementing common sense tort reform. If you want to talk about greedy, you should be pointing your finger at ambulance chasing dirtbags like John Edwards instead of baselessly attacking the people who actually deliver health care.

Jack

November 19th, 2009
1:25 pm

If Obama had tried to make small, incremental changes in health care, he might have succeeded. But this wholesale change he and the Congress are trying to force on the people that will actually pay for it, will not succeed.

john

November 19th, 2009
1:52 pm

hmm…medicare cannot pay for itself?? did see some good news today on the ajc.com fulton county is slashing spending!!! AMEN!! time to run on a leaner staff, next up, lets get rid of the pension plans and maybe just maybe will not have to raise taxes….good day for the tax payers in fulton county

Phil

November 19th, 2009
1:54 pm

… and Cynthia’s never been right. How does someone distort reality like this keep a job?

Joey

November 19th, 2009
2:06 pm

Cynthia;
Have you and I lived in the same US since 1961? It seems obvious that Reagan was correct.

Democrats have been trying to legislate National Health Care continuously since Medicare was implimented. Their plan was to take an incremental approach. Fortunately Democrats have not had full control of the Legislative and Executive Branches for sufficient time to succeed.

Reagan served 2 terms as President. But what was one of the first efforts of Democrats under Clinton? National Health Care. The effort cost the Democrats control of Congress. Clinton held on, but did not make another effort at National Health Care.

Then we had 2 terms of Bush. But after that what was at the top of the Democrat to do list under Obama? Right. National Health Care. Will it cost Democrats control of Congress again? Almost certainly.

john

November 19th, 2009
2:07 pm

Road Scholar, hahahaha…you do not even know what a Rhode Scholar is..

Tom Middleton

November 19th, 2009
2:25 pm

Poor Reagan. There was a lot he was wrong about. One of my other favorites was his solemn campaign promise to balance the budget by the end of his first term. Whoops!

We didn’t get that one fulfilled until President Clinton got into office, and then we got a surplus. Like I said, poor Reagan. He wasn’t even here when he was here.

But with the health industry’s propensity for booting sick people off the rolls into nothing, today’s elderly would have no health care at all without Medicare. All you folks who love your parents, aunts, and uncles should be deeply grateful for your so-called “socialist” program, for can you imagine your out-of-pocket without it? Whoops again! (I’ll bet even the Reagan family used Medicare once Ronnie got sick.)

But you’d still be whining at the government like always, for that’s just what you do; but this time, it would be for an entirely different reason. This time, you’d be demanding your “socialist” program, not trying to destroy it. Poor Reagan for sure, but poor stupid right-wingers as well. Get a clue, folks!

Peadawg

November 19th, 2009
2:26 pm

Cynthia, are YOU saying that YOU think they were wrong about Medicare? How is Obama’s health care plan any different? How can you oppose Medicare but be FOR Obama’s health care plan?

I asked you this question the other day and you never answered(you even modified your blog itself after I asked it)…it’ll be interesting if you answer it this time.

Grumpy

November 19th, 2009
2:36 pm

Free stuff is usually popular for the people receiving it.

Doesn’t make it good when the free stuff will ultimately bankrupt us.

Skip

November 19th, 2009
2:50 pm

I guess wars must pay for themselves.

jt

November 19th, 2009
3:07 pm

Reagan was right!!

Medicare distorted the market, and now government will ride to the rescue of what itself screwed up. Listen to the man himself–

“One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine. It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project. Most people are a little reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can’t afford it.”

Ronald Reagan speaks out against Socialized Medicine, 1961

LibraryJim

November 19th, 2009
3:08 pm

Skip, National Defense is clearly called for in the constitution. Government run Health Care is not.

Scott

November 19th, 2009
3:17 pm

Tom, You are a dope. Enough said

Lookin In...

November 19th, 2009
3:21 pm

mike

November 19th, 2009
1:22 pm

Mike, In 2001, My brother went into the hospital to have a pin inserted into his left hand. The Dr. Not only inserted the pin into the wrong hand, but nicked an vein in his hand that cause bleeding after surgery that was not caught until two days later. He sued and during trail it was learned that the Dr. Performed one additional operation that day, and rushed the proceedure in order to make the second scheduled surgery. The insurance Co. offered 10K to settle the case. He now has 65% usage of his hand and they only offered 10 grand to settle this case. His Hospital bills are more the 20 times that amount! BTW he was awarded 1.9 million at trial… The Dr. is still practicing at the same hospital. This is why we don’t need across the board tort reform. Without the treat of monetary punishment, The medical community would piss all over us in an effort to maximize the money. If you can’t hit them in the pockets, you can’t hurt them….

Alex Rodriguez

November 19th, 2009
3:21 pm

YES!

No more government entitlement programs!

William

November 19th, 2009
3:25 pm

I want healthcare and not a job. I could get food stamps and if I am list that I am in poverty level I can get other subsidies too. So I have food, clothing, education(college degree), and now all I need is healthcare. Who wants to work all week and get stresse out. FORGET THE JOBS I WANT HEALTHCARE.

El Jefe

November 19th, 2009
3:27 pm

Reagan was not only right, but foresaw the creeping socialism that is so persuasive today.

Everyone wants something for nothing – that is why we are in such sad shape. We are saddled with tremendous debt and staggering new taxes just to pay for all the “free” benefits bestowed upon us by the benevolent dictator called Congress.

DAVID

November 19th, 2009
3:31 pm

MEDICARE IS BROKE…..you idiot………..

DT

November 19th, 2009
3:31 pm

It’s now an entitlement (unfortunately) and politicians are too scared to take on AARP and other well paid lobbyists.
But I would say that he was 100% correct that it started a wave of government programs that have screwed the company up royally, so Mr. Reagan was right (and he was even a Democrat in 1961(!)). Explosions in government programs have contributed to the disintegration of the family unit in the country, from which most of society’s problems emanate (crime, poverty, to name a couple small ones)

Chris Broe

November 19th, 2009
3:34 pm

ck hall

November 19th, 2009
3:41 pm

If you want to start some crap–How about FDR and his socialistic beginnings for America!

Gordon

November 19th, 2009
3:41 pm

OF COURSE IT IS POPULAR- IT ISN’T PAID FOR!!! As George Will puts it, we get 2009 medicine at 1960’s prices.

Don’t you realize that the unfunded liabilities on Medicare are in the tens of trillions of dollars? I’m sure politicians were telling us way back when that Medicare would only cost so much and we could afford it, but it has cost orders of magnitude more and is now beyond bankrupt. Why? Because politicians are not accountable for the bad decisions they make, especially when the cost of those decisions is decades later. Why in God’s name would you want more of that?

It is amazing that Cynthia Tucker would point to Medicare as an example of why more government involvement in healthcare is a good idea. This is the best argument of why we SHOULDN’T do it.

Unbelievable.

ck hall

November 19th, 2009
3:45 pm

Cynthia, Keep on paraphrasing articles to make yourself look like a writer, and it just might win you another “token” Pulitzer!

mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the LIAR Obama

November 19th, 2009
3:46 pm

Yes, and so was social security….it’s NOT the tax payer’s job to give entitlements, PERIOD!

Scott

November 19th, 2009
3:48 pm

Lookin in,
I am sorry to hear about your brother’s injury. If you think the doctor that operated on your brother was scary, think about the quality of doctors that our going to be out there when their pay is lower as a result of this scary legislation and they will still have to worry about the possibility of being sued due to a lack of tort reform. You are going to have wait in long lines to see a lesser-qualified doctor, who is going to order more tests than normal, and you will get to pay even more for this great service. Thanks everybody for voting for this change. Really. We all appreciate it.

Lookin In...

November 19th, 2009
4:04 pm

Scott

November 19th, 2009
3:48 pm
I am not an advocate for health care reform as it is currently being presented. I just felt the need to challenge Mike on the notion that Tort reform is the answer to our health care crisis. it is just not that simple. yes the cost of insurance needs to be controled for Doctors, but my premiums have risen about 35% in the last 3 years!!! Now I have no issues with any company making a profit, but I do have and issue with the Insurance conpanies pissing on my head and telling me its raining. Be upfront enoung to make it about your profit margins stop hiding behind all of the things that they hide behind and truly compete. And if that means competeing against a gov. insurance company, then doit…Offer better care in a better stiing at a competitive cost and they will survive and thrive. Just like UPS does against the post office.

getalife

November 19th, 2009
4:15 pm

Git ur guvmit handz off mi heathcare!

jconservative

November 19th, 2009
4:22 pm

Fact. Reagan did the single largest expansion of Medicare in history.
Added Federal employees to Medicare and expanded Medicare benefits to provide coverage for catastrophic illness and prescription drugs.
(Thankfully Bush 41 had this last one cancelled.) And, of course, Reagan made the famous deal with Tip O’Neill & “saved” Social Security.

Whats on the outside is not always a clue to what is on the inside.
Reagan was no exception.

On the otherhand Bob Dole fought Medicare to the end from the House floor. But it came back to haunt him; Clinton ran ads showing Dole speeches trying to defeat Medicare & the 1996 Dole campaign was dead on arrival.

Gotta give Reagan credit for a lot of political savvy.

rolheath

November 19th, 2009
4:25 pm

lets see national health care hasn’t broke britian, germany,japan ,the nederlands, france, italy,sweden,norway,
austria, there’s more

mike

November 19th, 2009
4:26 pm

Lookin In… -

That’s great. So let’s all deal with a health care system bloated by malpractice insurance expense and loads of unnecessary tests to ensure that the world is fair. Lord knows we need to punish those bad old doctors and ruin them for any mistake they make, because lord knows that we should demand infallibility from this particular group of people.

I love how liberals can groan about “greedy” doctors and insurance companies and then go right ahead and defend the disgusting greed of trial lawyers like John Edwards.

mike

November 19th, 2009
4:27 pm

getalife –

And as you would say, ‘get all meaningful and coherent thought from my comments”

Goldie

November 19th, 2009
4:28 pm

Cynthia — to the extremist wingnuts, trillions spent here at home for American families is “expanding government” and/or “socialism”, but just mention invading and occupying a foreign country for decades and spending TRILLIONS in the process and that’s known as being “patriotic”… seems like messed up priorities to me!

Mike Mc

November 19th, 2009
4:31 pm

Had Enough of Cynthia Tucker … Cythia is a “Worthless human being.” What the hell? She has a family who would say otherwise. Have a little respect and dignity and try infusing a little Pragmatism into the debate rather than your emotionalism. We can all hide behind our computers and spew such hate because it’s a lot harder trying to promote change at the grassroots level. UGH.

Scott

November 19th, 2009
4:31 pm

Tom, It’s funny. You must have me confused for somebody else. I am not a right-winger. I am a conservative independent. We went a few rounds one time and then I hung you for some questions and never saw you since. Given that your infatuation with Cynthia, I already know that I am light years ahead of you. Let’s hear some more of your liberal lies about how these programs are going help America. The economy is tanking, the wars are still going on in both countries, unemployment continues to skyrocket(All of these things were supposed to be fixed by Obama) and all Obamao can do is look for a way to have a “great photo op” with our troops. He is a clown, his policies are misguided and he is going to make this country worse than it was under Carter. But, hey keep believing that Americans are going to settle for this next year during the election. Keep thinking that they will go out and cast votes for more Dems when we all know the real truth. Next year, the people that voted for the American Idol rather than a president will not be at the polls. The REAL voting public will put an end to this 2-year catastrophe. Count on it.

SouthGaDawg

November 19th, 2009
4:33 pm

Uggh Cynthia you do realize that this new health care reform plan will “change” Medicare. It will basically kill it.

So what exactly is the point of this column?

Scott

November 19th, 2009
4:40 pm

Lookin in,
“Offer better care in a better stiing at a competitive cost and they will survive and thrive. Just like UPS does against the post office.” The problem is that the government has to constantly bail out the USPS all of the time. They are always getting more and more money but they never get any better. And what do they do????They raise the price of a stamp every couple of years in order to pay for a system laden in inefficiencies. Now there is also a big difference between the USPS and this healthcare garbage. The Constitution tells us that we MUST have a postal service. Not sure where it says taxpayers should pay for everybody’s healthcare even if they don’t pay taxes. If you can find it, please let me know where to find it.
Also, I agree with Mike. How can you hold doctors and insurance companies in contempt for being greedy, while overlooking the greediest of them all…..scumbag lawyers.

BS Aplenty

November 19th, 2009
4:44 pm

The socialist program Medicare’s impending collapse is the genesis of this healthcare non-reform from the Obama Administration. Medicare’s inability to support itself for little more than half a century ought to be caution enough for most Americans before they allow a complete Medicare-ization of healthcare in this country. Unfortunately, ignorance is no impediment for our Democrat Party and it’s bumbler-in-chief, Mr. Obama.

Here’s the problem: According to GAO estimates, Medicare will add 55 TRILLION dollars to the federal deficit over the next seventy years or so. That’s right, TRILLION, if Medicare stays “as is.” If you tack on the inevitable “government boondoggle multiplier effect”, those TRILLIONS will likely double.

Now, you’d think the Obama Administration would see this as a sign that a market based solution was necessary. Uh, no they don’t, there’s vested interests to be considered, redistribution to account for and just taking care of the Dem voting base. Instead of running away from a failing socialist solution like Medicare, the Obama Administration reasons that if a little government is bad then a lot more will even more terrible – but later on – after someone else is elected – and it’s someone else’s problem.

jconservative

November 19th, 2009
4:44 pm

El Jefe
“Reagan was not only right, but foresaw the creeping socialism that is so persuasive today.”

Foresaw? Foresaw? Sir it started in 1933 with FDR. Creeping? It was creeping in the 1930’s, by the 1960’s it was an avalanche.

You blame Congress – and I do not disagree. But you fail to blame the Presidents. Everyone of those “socialistic” acts by Congress was signed into law by a President. Some were Democratic presidents and some were Republican presidents. No one is innocent here.

Those congresses & those presidents were doing what they felt they had to do to get re-elected. Since Johnson, 4 of the 6 presidents who ran for re-election were re-elected. And you know the vast majority of both houses of congress were re-elected.

So what we have now is what “we voters” deserve.

I am thrilled that so many of you are now realizing the need to pay as you go. I have been fighting this battle since Reagan cut taxes & increased spending in his very first budget. I welcome the help.

Lookin In...

November 19th, 2009
4:46 pm

Scott

November 19th, 2009
3:48 pm

it is you and folks like you that make honest debate not possible in this country at this time. I never said anything in defense of any trail lawyer. My point was and ramins that tort reform is a red hearing thrown into the mix to distract from the real issues. And for the record, We or should I say I don’t expect Doctors to be perfect, But I do expect them to be responsible and mindful of the fact that these patients are real people not just a means to their next country club membership.

Scott

November 19th, 2009
5:02 pm

Lookin in….Come on…Most doctors are not scumbags. They are out to do the right thing. Yes, you have a few bad apples, but that is nothign compared to the scumbag attorneys. It sucks that doctors have to pay so much in malpractice insurance because of frivolous lawsuits. It sucks that they feel obligated to force us to go through millions of test in order to save their hides and even then, they still must worry that some jerk is going to sue them because they misdiagnosed something. Everybody make mistakes. Doctors should be able to practice medicine without the fear of being sent into financial ruin if they make one misdiagnosis. To say that we are going to reform healthcare without even touching tort reform is criminal and will not result in improved healthcare for everybody.

Lookin In...

November 19th, 2009
5:02 pm

Scott

November 19th, 2009
4:40 pm

Nice try, but the USPS have not recieved a single dollar of taxpayer money since the early 80’s. What are the insurance companies afraid of? If They can provide a service be it health care, Mail delivery, natural gas service or whatever, in a way that is better than the Gov. then They would and and do get my money. I run a business that ships roughtly 15,000 small packages a month and I get hit up for business by the USPS almaost daily. But UPS delivers it more timely and at a better price so they get the business. Now FEDEX is becoming a player in some of our markets so they are getting some to. See all you have to do is build the best mouse trap, and you will always have your share of the market. Now I ask again, what are the insurance companies afraid of?
BTW, try making Dr.’s be bad Dr.’s be accountable without them. If there was not so much malpractice, there would not be so many trail lawyers…

Lookin In...

November 19th, 2009
5:08 pm

Scott

November 19th, 2009
5:02 pm

I agree, Most are not bad doctors and even fewer are bad people, But i watched a Dr. nearly make my brother hadicapped in order to keep an overloaded surgical schedule. He was more concerned about the 40,000 or so that the surgery would cost than teh patient that he was working on. Now tell me, If that were you or your child on that table, would you be so willing to give him and Doctors like him a pass? How much is the use of your had worth to you? Would you be OK with a 250,000 cap as has been proposed? What happens when that amount covers the cost of fixing the mistake, but you never have complete use of your hand again? Pleas tell me you would be ok with that….

samuel

November 19th, 2009
5:11 pm

Conservatives on this blog seem to forget that, if they live long enough, they will be Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries too. These two programs have saved tens if not hundreds of millions of elderly and disabled Americans from a life of destitution. For people who receive pension and health care benefits after they retire, you folks are lucky. But most retired workers receive neither, so most will need both programs once they’re old enough. For the sink-or-swim crowd out there, it’s just a matter of simple human decency.

Ward

November 19th, 2009
5:17 pm

It’s Norman Thomas, Cynthia, not ‘Normal’. Leader of the American Socialist Party before they all became Democrats.

Sunshine and Thunder

November 19th, 2009
5:19 pm

“Reagan was wrong, too.”

No he wasn’t. The Fed Gov IS invading almost every aspect of our private lives and business. Since 1961 we have seen the onset of the US Department of Education, the EPA, OSHA, and the US Department of Energy. The IRS has become more aggressive in its violations of the 1st, 4th, 5th and 10th Amendments. There are laws on the books to tell us what kind of toilets and light bulbs we can buy. Congress has “made a law abridging the freedom of speech”. And now the government has stolen money from its citizens and given it to cover the risks taken by wealthy bankers. Hate speech laws tell us what we must think while committing a crime.

Reagan was right.

Jake

November 19th, 2009
5:22 pm

One of the biggest problems with the current healthcare reform bills is that they are not very socialistic. By most estimates less than 10% of Americans will qualify for the public option, leaving the rest of us with what we already have (or the soon-to-be-reduced Medicare coverage). A single payer plan would offer some hope but the trash currently in Congress has an excellent chance of hurting more than it will help.

Taxpayer 2

November 19th, 2009
5:23 pm

Is it just me or don’t they always point out how Medicare and Social Security are both almost bankrupt? Why on earth would you point to that as an example of a successful program when it is clearly not a successful program and has a ton of waste that for the last 30 years, no Republican OR Democrat has bothered to try to correct it.

In 1965, Medicare Part A was passed with a cost estimate of $9 Billion in 1990. The actual cost in 1990 was $67 billion! In just 1987, Medicare added a hospital subsidy that was expected to cost $100 million and ended up costing $11 BILLION in 1992, just five years later.

What I can tell all the Government Health Care supporters out there that there is absolutely not one large Government project that has ever even come close to the costs estimates or under the costs estimates. What does it really matter anyways? With debt like this of $30,000 for every man, woman and child owed in this country today because of Government spending, why not go ahead and double that or more by adding Government Health Care. What’s the worst that can happen?

Jake

November 19th, 2009
5:24 pm

He got $1.7M over the cost of his care and only has one hand impaired 35%? Where do I sign up for that procedure?

pat

November 19th, 2009
5:29 pm

Yeah, medicare works so great, you have to supplement it or you can’t afford your medications. To top it off, it’s bankrupt.

So you take an example of a failed system we’re stuck with as a reason to have another failed system to stick us with?

Sorry, “Let’s take something bad and make it worse.” is not a convincing argument.

Lookin In...

November 19th, 2009
5:34 pm

Jake

November 19th, 2009
5:24 pm

So would you see your childs dexterity for 1.7 mil? What if it were your childs kidney or heart? 1.9 sounds like a lot of money and in some respects it is, but in his case He would rather have his complete health.

Jake

November 19th, 2009
5:39 pm

There’s about 70 milion baby boomers beginning to go on SS and Medicare with only the Gen y’s and 20 million illegal aliens to pay the bills. So the solution is to entitle another 20 million poor people with health insurance?

Jake

November 19th, 2009
5:43 pm

Okay, I’d need like $2.3M minimum for a whole heart!!!!! I’m sorry for his loss and that he feels that way. Skipping the inane heart and kidney part my answer is I will sell the dexterity in one of my hands for $1.7M tomorrow. As for my daughter, she’s old enough to make her own decision.

Jack

November 19th, 2009
5:53 pm

Thank you Cynthia for bringing Kristof’s column and Reagan’s mistakes/myths to the discussion. History will show that Medicare and now Health Reform will be both popular and life saving for millions of deserving Americans. We are best when we come together and solve problems rather than “go it alone” like some sad ol’ cowboy looking for a Marlboro or selling soap.
We deserve the change we voted for, so says the Constitution, and all these chicken hawks and bitter Cheney wannabes need to go back to hiding in some undisclosed location with a copy of Sarah’s book and Newsweek cover.

pat

November 19th, 2009
5:53 pm

That is correct, S and T. The governement has increased it’s pace of encroachment and control of our lives since the ’60’s.
It’s really hard for me to fathom rational, thinking, educated people can possibly think this is or ever could be a good idea.

Dave

November 19th, 2009
5:58 pm

What really amazes me Ms. Tucker is you write two paragraphs (one of which is quoting someone else) and you’re done. So how many of these do you now do a week? 3 They must not be paying you by the word and surely they’re not paying you based on the logic of the content. I guess the only reason I come here anymore, is to see your followers comments that are even less logical then yours.

hryder

November 19th, 2009
6:00 pm

Those of us who are voters, in my opinion, should be certain that the current members of Congress are rejected the very next time they stand for election. Most have shown a total detachment from economic reality and would be bankrupt if they managed personal finances as they do our country’s. All of us(citizens) are entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Not the attainment, but the pursuit of happiness. All but those with a mental or physical disability should be ashamed to be on the public dole and required to EARN what they desire. Currently, there exists a multitude of programs that can lead to success in achieving normal monetary goals if one is close to normal and puts forth reasonable effort. Excuses are what are put forth by society’s lazy leeches.

mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the LIAR Obama

November 19th, 2009
6:04 pm

Trust the government to run something right? Ask the American Indians, look at Fanny Mae & Freddie Mac – need $30 BILLION more taxpayer dollars.

Government Spending—BANKRUPT
“U.S. Posts $176.36 Billion Deficit for October”

Cash for Clunkers— “Cash for Clunkers’ Ran Out of Gas”

US Department of Agriculture— “USDA Paid Dead Farmers $1.1B”

The post office is a wreck, no competition and they can’t make money – tired of standing in their lines, just wait until tax payer funded heath care kicks in.

And, on and on and on…….

Michelle

November 19th, 2009
6:04 pm

Provides a great perspective. Ms Tucker will you PLEASE run for Senator or Governor. I’m tired of idiots representing me and/or governing me

Lookin In...

November 19th, 2009
6:06 pm

Jake

November 19th, 2009
5:43 pm

I respect you choice, And if it were simply a matter of choice, I would understand, but in this case as in so many others, It was not his choice. His loss was due to the negligence of the Dr. and that is the key. Incompetence has a price. it cost my brother usage of his hand, it cost some thier lives… it “only” cost the insurance company less than 2 million

mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the LIAR Obama

November 19th, 2009
6:07 pm

Michelle, GREAT JOKE! PLEASE, unless your moving to DC, you’re out of luck and they don’t have a govenor or senator.

mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the LIAR Obama

November 19th, 2009
6:14 pm

Samuel, why did’t the unfortunate people PLAN ahead for their retirement, they only had about 30-40 years to do it?

AT

November 19th, 2009
6:27 pm

Neither Medicare nor any part of this Health Care proposal is Constitutional. I’ve yet to read any coherent argument that Congress or BHO even has the constitutionally granted power to discuss it, much less implement it.

Popular or not, effective or not, both are still unconstitutional. If Congress, BHO or anybody wants to change that, the constitution has provisions to change itself. But as it stands now, it ain’t there.

Sunshine and Thunder

November 19th, 2009
6:41 pm

mmm, mmm, mmm, Barack the LIAR Obama :

“why did’t the unfortunate people PLAN ahead for their retirement,”

Kind of hard to do when the Federal gov’t is stealing 50% of your income and calling it “investment”.

Linda

November 19th, 2009
6:49 pm

The Dems are telling the Reps, “I told you so! I told you these programs wouldn’t bankrupt the US!”

Really?

In addition to the national debt of $12 T, there’s $106 T in unfunded liabilities ($14 T to social security & $92 T to Medicare), 7 times the amt. of GDP & twice the nation’s entire net worth of $51 T! The budget deficit will add trillions more over the next few years. In 3 yrs., the interest on the debt will equal our income! In 7 yrs., Medicare will be bankrupt. According to a federal ruling today, it appears taxpayers will be responsible for all the Katrina damage in part of New Orleans, another trillion or so, based on negligence of the fed govt.

The same Americans who think there is a Medicare Fund & Social Security Fund think there will be a Health Care Insurance Reform Bill Fund for all these taxes & fines to be collected for 4 yrs before the actual “benefits” click in. Yeah, right. The govt spends every dime it gets its hands on, borrows what it can’t tax & prints what it can’t borrow. When the dollar is near worthless, we’ll think of ‘09 as the good old days.

Medicare is an irreversible entitlement. It’s a rank & fetid sewer hole of corruption & fraud. The fed govt is promising to root out the corruption & fraud. If the fed govt has a clue how to reform Medicare, do it, before passing another entitlement program. The cost estimates for the 1st 25 yrs were off 900%.

Social Security is a giant ponzi scheme & did nothing to get us out of the Depression.

If the cost estimates for the health care bill are off as much as they were for SS & Medicare, the House bill will cost $10 T over 10 yrs. & the Senate bill will cost $8.5 T.

The hc bill had 3 goals. According to the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office report today, the Senate bill would INCREASE, not lower costs, & premiums would be HIGHER, not lower. The only goal it accomplishes is covering more people. So what does the other 2073 pages cover & what are the 53 new govt agencies for?

If Medicare is an example of a govt success & a reason to vote for the hc bill, run for the hills, just as fast as you can. Would the P.O., Amtrak, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac have been better examples?

This bill is so far left, even many Dems won’t vote for it.

Dunwoody Mike

November 19th, 2009
6:52 pm

The opinion of some of the responses on this board is morally and ethically repugnant, especially the idea that it is OK to spend trillions on corporate welfare and imperialist warfare, but can not spend anything to ensure the health of its citizens or that it’s senior citizens are not homeless and destitute. Some respondents need to check out the statistics on elderly poverty in the U.S.

mike

November 19th, 2009
7:07 pm

Dunwoody Mike –

“The opinion of some of the responses on this board is morally and ethically repugnant,”

LOL. Another liberal forcing his morality on us. I thought only conservatives did that, Mike. What’s up with that.

The notion that our senior citizens are homeless and destitute is a joke. You need to update your partisan liberal boilerplate rhetoric. Apparently, you have a copy from the 60s.

Tom Middleton

November 19th, 2009
7:16 pm

Scott: You must have me confused for somebody else.

Nope, Scott, you’re the same old Scott spouting that same right-wing gibberish. I answer you over and over again, but it’s you who finally run away because you have no logic to answer me back.

It took us eight years of political and economic insanity to get us into this mess, and you want us out in ten months? Have you noticed we’re already seeing the clear beginnings of economic turnaround? I think it’s obvious you haven’t.

It took President Bush years, not months, to begin seeing any kind of results from his massive tax cuts for the rich, and you right-wingers supported him like he was Jesus come again. Now that you, we, and most of the world know he wasn’t quite bright, you appear to be having severe memory lapses about his record, and can’t admit you were wrong. You do know he has a record, don’t you, Scott?

And not only can’t you remember anything, you want to turn around and do us all over again what he did, but not a chance in your right-wing dreams, dude. Spout your krap all you want, it won’t change the fact that the most American voters are not as dumb as you think they are. Maybe you are, but they’re not.

America is changing for the better, Scott We’re moving away from your politics of race in favor of freedom-for-all ones for everyone, not necessarily through government, but through the constitutional concern for all of us together. That means, Scott, that your politics of selfishism are going buh-bye, whether you like it or not.

And of course I like Cynthia, even though I disagree with her on occasion. She’s very, very intelligent and good at what she does, and has been for years. Not only that, but she’s a virtual saint for putting up with all you goofs who have nothing better to do everyday than come in here and call her inappropriate names.

It’s pathetic, Scott, and you’re one of them. Where’s the logic, pal? You got any of this you can throw in every once in awhile to try and keep it interesting for those of us taking this blog seriously?

So who are you pulling for, for our next president, Sarah Palin? Got your autographed copy of her book of self-serving lies yet? Better hurry because there are a whole lot of folks in the media and McCain campaign pointing out all the many places where she’s clearly not telling the truth. Is this the best you can do in your conservative “independent” party? New York 23RD, dude! :)

AT

November 19th, 2009
7:23 pm

Dunwoody,
I’ll agree with you and more. It is morally and ethically repugnant to seize money at the point of a gun to “give” it to anyone: Senior citizens, unhealthy citizens or corporate welfare.

samuel

November 19th, 2009
7:58 pm

To the conservatives on this blog who rant about the government “stealing” their money in taxes and about projected deficits decades into the future for both Social Security and Medicare, as well as critizing people for not planning their retirement, I ask: How old are you folks? Do you have kids? Are you wealthy enough to complain about the government “stealing” your money? Do any of plan on working for the same company for 30 or 40 years? Most current retirees didn’t make enough money to retire comfortably, and most have no pensions or health care benefits to speak of, all the while struggling to raise families and making the best life that they could. Perhaps if any of you become disabled or you live long enough to retire, you will understand the reason behind these programs. As others have pointed out, every other advanced country has universal health care for its citizens and has lower health care costs and higher life expectancy at the same time. Instead of being obsessed with money that you can’t take with you when you die, think about the good of your fellow man. It’s a matter of simple human decency.

AT

November 19th, 2009
8:10 pm

Sam,
I’m old enough to be very “vested” in SS and Medicare, (by force), and young enough to know I will never see any of that money again. As a result, I don’t plan on it. I live way under my means to provide for my own future as well as for the future of those around me.
Everyone should think about the good of the fellow man, why do you assume I don’t? My objection is the assault on our liberty to force people to do what the gov’t decides is charitable. There is no charity in government hand-outs, no matter how altruistic. All gov’t money is seized, by force or threat of force.

Linda

November 19th, 2009
8:19 pm

Mr. Middleton, It appears that you do not merely disagree with conservatives. You hate them. You use many vile words in you comments toward those of us who differ with you. We’re here to communicate, to share our opinions, learn from each other & try to come up with solutions, together.
Politics is not a football game where one side wins. If our country is not successful, we all loose.
Politicians are politicians, regardless of party affiliation. No one is right or wrong all of the time.
You are entitled to you opinions, but they are trite, nasty & unproven by facts & statistics (rhetoric).

You Distort, We Deride

November 19th, 2009
8:34 pm

Poor right wing. It seems the only programs they support are the ones their legislators and Presidents put into effect. Here’s a little clue for all of you: Iraq and Afghanistan are bankrupting us too. I guess if we could figure out a way to wrap the entire health care system in an American flag, we could get conservative support.

Come to think of it, I was strongly opposed to these wars, particularly the fact that there was no exit strategy to either and the cost was incalculable. But the fiscal conservatives were more interested in drawing Middle Eastern blood than they were in saving money (or attacking the right people, for that matter). After the Bush debacle, the conservatives no longer have any credibility. If Democrats say yes, the Republicans say no. How predictable. And how utterly un-American.

Linda

November 19th, 2009
8:36 pm

Samuel, There is NO social security.
There is NO Medicare.
The money is gone spent, zip. They are merely programs without any money.
The hc bill will INCREASE hc costs.
2 million people die each yr who have health care.
Health care insurance has not prevented people from dying.
Up to 85% of people die from their lifestyle, not because they didn’t have insurance.

Linda

November 19th, 2009
8:55 pm

Mr. Distort, The consensus is that the American people want health care reform. Tell me exactly what in this bill reforms health care.
The Afghanistan & Iraq wars have cost us about $900,000,000,000 during the last 8 & 7 yrs., 15 yrs. total. Don’t you think it’s an amazing coincidence that this current DC bunch passed a bill less than 3 wks after the inauguration, within a matter of hours, unread, that was almost exactly for the same amt of money, that they called an economic stimulus & promised would prevent the current unemployment rate of 7.6% from exceeding 8%? Isn’t unemployment now 10.2% if you don’t count everyone?
Don’t you also find it amazing that what we’ve spent on these 2 wars & what we spent on this bill is the same amt of debt we owned China back in Jan?
What was that Bush debacle you referred to?
Who is holding up the passage of the HC bill? I thought the Dems could pass anything they wanted to. Are the Dems un-American?

samuel

November 19th, 2009
9:11 pm

Linda, no matter how diligent you are in maintaining your health, you will get sick and die at some point. You could die at 42 (my age) or at 108 (my great-grandmother’s age). It’s natural to die, no matter how long you live. No one deserves to be blamed for becoming sick and dying, no matter what their lifestyle. Conservative talk about “personal responsibility” when it comes to health is silly, because no one knows when they’re going to die. This is the point i’m making about Socaial Security, Medicare and the health care reform bill. People get old, they become disabled and they die. You can’t take whatever money you have into the afterlife. Are you religious? God doesn’t care how much money you have. He cares about how you treat your fellow human being. it’s the very defintion of morality.

Scott

November 19th, 2009
9:19 pm

“I answer you over and over again, but it’s you who finally run away because you have no logic to answer me back.” Uh…nope. You have responded to me once. You still have yet to give me ANY example of a country that has prospered by adopting Big government policies. We all know why that is…..Because you CAN’T!!!!

“t took us eight years of political and economic insanity to get us into this mess, and you want us out in ten months?” It’s funny how you fail to remember/acknowledge that the Dems were also in control of Congress right when the economy started going downhill… Hmmmm. it’s also funny that you fail to remember that Clinton’s weak position on National Defense resulted in 9/11, which affected this country dramatically. hmmmmm.

“Have you noticed we’re already seeing the clear beginnings of economic turnaround? I think it’s obvious you haven’t.” We have???? How/Why? Because the market has gone up a little bit? Look at the value of the dollar and you will see that the market value hasn’t changed a bit. Look at unemployment. What did Obama say it was going to be? 8% and the stimulus would solve it. How is that working out for us?

“It took President Bush years, not months, to begin seeing any kind of results from his massive tax cuts for the rich, and you right-wingers supported him like he was Jesus come again. Now that you, we, and most of the world know he wasn’t quite bright, you appear to be having severe memory lapses about his record, and can’t admit you were wrong. You do know he has a record, don’t you, Scott?” Tax cuts worked nicely. They helped this country’s economy. If you want blame look at your buddies Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. Everybody HAD to have a house under tehem regardless of whether they could pay.

“most American voters are not as dumb as you think they are.” They aren’t dumb???? Really, look who is POTUS. Enough said on that one.

“And of course I like Cynthia, even though I disagree with her on occasion. She’s very, very intelligent and good at what she does” HA! She lacks any journalism skills and like the rest of the liberal media, only looks for half the information. Only reports on things when it suits their agenda.

“So who are you pulling for, for our next president, Sarah Palin?” Nope….Don’t like her. She is almost as phony as Obamao. I kind of like Mitt Romney or Huckabee. You never know who might appear though.

“Is this the best you can do in your conservative “independent” party? New York 23RD, dude! :) ” As big of a Doofis Hoffman was in that race, there are many things in there that brings question marks on that race. Much like the MN Senate race, it is funny where all of the votes went/came. Shady stuff. I wouldn’t put too much weight into that race. Why don’t you look at the results in New Jersey. How about VA? Your party needs to seriously look at what is going to happen in many districts next year. Why do you think all of this legislation is being slammed through now? It is not because they want to bring change. it’s because they know that once America sees this garbage, they are not going to make the same mistake they made last year. Hey keep believing your drivel though. Keep believing in that change. If you think America, saddled with 10-12% unemployment is going to vote Dem again, you must be on crack. JOBS JOBS JOBS…and they sure are not going to come with the policies being adopted right now. It is going to be a JOBLESS recovery and America will not stand for it.
You can leave now. I am through with you.

Scott

November 19th, 2009
9:19 pm

Tom, my response to your rambling is above.

Linda

November 19th, 2009
9:39 pm

Samuel, I am very religious.
You didn’t answer any of my questions.

Linda

November 19th, 2009
10:01 pm

Scott, You are wasting your time. I’ve debated him before. I’ve stated facts & statistics & he ignores them. I don’t think he reads any posts that disagree with him. His mind is closed. He uses the same rhetoric day after day. He’s irrelevant. He’s already drunk the drink. Just ignore his rants & raves. Don’t fall victim to him.
May God bless you & yours for being a great American.

Regan was Right

November 19th, 2009
11:24 pm

Linda does a great job of putting forth the facts. She would make a much better blog moderator than the current moderator. Tom is delusional and so was Jack. Reagan was right. Only government could deem a program successful that is 9 times over original budget and is now broke.

Ayn Rand Was Right

November 19th, 2009
11:35 pm

Not knowing the specifics, but understanding that the doctor who botched the operation is still practicing at the same hospital, leads me to believe that the issue was the hospital’s greed, not the doctor’s. You see, the hospitals are run by business men who are focused like lasers on profit. Not that focusing on profit is bad, but when it comes to things like healthcare and surgery, it’s better to leave the productivity models for the cafeteria and back office staff. The hospitals dictate how long operating rooms are available and to whom they are available. The staff is comprised of their employees (usually minus the surgeon and a nurse or two). If the doctor was rushing through surgery, it was his fault for playing to the bureaucracy, but I am willing to bet he did not create the policy that resulted in your brother’s injury.

Linda

November 19th, 2009
11:42 pm

Regan, May I have the honor of either adopting or somehow bringing you into my family? I would be so honored. Thank you for the compliment. I’ve already asked God to bless you, but I also asked Him to challenge you to further help solve the problems our country is now facing. I pray that you will inspire others as you have inspired me tonight.

Tom Middleton

November 20th, 2009
12:07 am

Scott@9:19pm: You can leave now. I am through with you.

Well, thanks for the permission, dude, but nobody’s going anywhere, at least, I know I’m not. But if you don’t like it, then maybe YOU should think about going somewhere else.

Let’s see, now where is there somewhere you might find much more appealing than living in a truly free United States of America? Russia is still available and isn’t communist anymore. (You know how you like to call Cynthia “comrade” daily?) It’s awfully authoritarian though under “Puty Poo,” but I think you’ll fit right in.

Or maybe you could go to northwestern Guyana and start your own weird settlement like Jim Jones did. But wait, that little experiment didn’t work any better than any of the attempts your radical right has made to take over our America. Remember Bush, Rove, and Cheney and their eight-year-long effort to create an imperial presidency with its “permanent conservative majority”? And let me ask you again, Scott: You do remember President Bush has a record, don’t you?

The devastation was so complete under his “leadership” that we just haven’t had the time to get back yet, but we will. And I think you and others like you know we will – why you’re doing all you can in this beginning of President Obama’s first term to bring him down.

I don’t think you’re evil, Scott. I just don’t think you know any better than what you’re saying. You’ve probably been thinking like you do ever since the struggle for civil rights began in the 60s when you first became a reactionary, and it’s highly unlikely you’ll be giving up your old battered habit until you can learn to see better for yourself. Miracles do happen.

But why are you so afraid of change, sir? Why don’t you want to see an America where all are equal and free? Don’t you like who we’re supposed to be and who our Founding Fathers intended us to become? And don’t you want us to help the rest of the world become free as well? It definitely doesn’t look like it to me.

You’re a part of America, sir, but so is everyone else – red, yellow, black, and white – and we’re not going to stand by and allow the likes of you and yours to take us back to what we absolutely know does NOT work. And to play on George Wallace: We won’t do it today; we won’t do it tomorrow; and we won’t do it forever and ever. Got it?

You can call us names, make up lies about us, kill us (or try to), or try to make us believe that up is down, right is left, and all the other goofy things you right-wingers love to say, and it’s not going to even make a dent in what we know is true. People like you have always stood in the way of progress – social and otherwise – but we’re onto you now, and it’s simply not going to work anymore.

You can continue lying about President Obama all you want, but most Americans by far recognize him as a very good man who needs longer than the 10 months you’re given him to succeed. Like I said, it took eight years of President Bush to get us into this mess (with people like you supporting him all the way), and it’ll probably take longer than one term for us to fix all the problems he caused.

You cannot win, sir. And as long as you’re on this blog and elsewhere spouting your radical-right politics, you’ll be hearing from the likes of me, consistently and often. Like I said, I’m not going anywhere, sir – I like it here – but feel free to run, run away anytime you get the urge! (And take Linda with you. The silly girl tried to tell me once that she was from Kenya and on welfare.)

P.S. Oh, and President Franklin Delano Roosevelt saved our economic and political systems from certain collapse with his “big government” approach to the Depression. You do know President Roosevelt has a record as well, don’t you, Scott? It’s one of outstanding achievement and success, and we’re still here as a democratic United States of America to prove it. So is there anything else you want to talk about, sir? Shoot!

Tom Middleton

November 20th, 2009
12:32 am

Linda@10:01pm

Linda, I learned early on that you can’t be trusted to tell the truth. Kenya? Welfare? Zoo? Whatever…

Linda

November 20th, 2009
12:33 am

Mr. Middleton, I have never been disrespectful of people who post comments on this blog & you are entitled to your opinions, but you have crossed the line. You are hateful. Your comments are vile. You cannot tolerate others who disagree with you. You rant & rave & are illogical. You lied about me & I take that personally. You need to get a grip or find something better to do.
I was raised as a Dem. Both of my parents were Dem. I’m a registered Dem. It’s people like you that turn me off from voting for Dems. You are NOT helping the Dem agenda. You are the problem.

Linda

November 20th, 2009
12:38 am

Mr. Middleton @ 12:32, These are more figments of your imagination. I’d rather be called a liar than an idiot.

Linda

November 20th, 2009
1:18 am

Mr, Middleton, I’ve had enough psychiatry courses to understand you. I have your profile. You are bitter. You can’t acknowledge facts.You’re in denial. You probably have relationship issues. Your tactics are deplorable.
I don’t ever want to discuss anything with you ever again. You are hopeless & irrevlant. You are a disgrace to the Dem party.

Peadawg

November 20th, 2009
6:25 am

Cynthia, still no logical answer to my 2:26pm post from yesterday? I never got one when I asked it a couple of days ago and I doubt I’ll get one now. Still can decide how Obamacare is better than Medicare?

not a CT fan

November 20th, 2009
6:30 am

Here’s a list of some of the new taxes that are in the 2074 page senate health care bill. wonder how many more there are in this bill and the house 1900+ pages. these taxes will take effect on passage but the health care will not begin until 2014. does anyone actually believe that this can work for the benefit of the American people? the egos of the people who came up with this piece of garbage is amazing. they should be booted out in the street asap.
Individual Mandate Tax = Income Surtax
Employer Mandate Tax
40% tax on “Cadillac” Health Insurance plans
Medicine Cabinet Tax (has to do with HSA/FSA accts)
HSA withdrawal tax hike
Excise tax on charitable hospitals
Tax on Innovator Drug companies
Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers
Tax on Cosmetic Surgery
Higher Payroll Tax on Upper Income
Tax on Health Insurers
Elimination of tax deductions for employer provided retirement drug coverage
Hike in Medicare Payroll Taxes
Blue Cross/Blue Shield Tax hike

And this is just a partial list. Under this plan, we won’t need healthcare because we will be taxed to death.

GT71

November 20th, 2009
7:17 am

As a sixty-something, I’ve been expecting the ‘Ice-floe Event’ for years. This is it. And if you don’t get what an ice-floe event might be, look into the way the eskimos (PC police, don’t bother reminding me about ‘eskimos’) handle the care for the aged and infirm.

cate white

November 20th, 2009
8:25 am

Medicare works just fine and has delivered good care for as long as I can remember. The drug program needs to be replaced by one like the Veterans Administration uses so as to bring costs down.

Scott

November 20th, 2009
1:58 pm

Tom, Your babbling wasn’t even wroth reading. There really wasn’t much substance to it at all. You know nothing about me and it shows.

Blame all you can on Bush and just keep ignoring that the Democrat-controlled Congress controlled the purse strings for the last 2 years of the Bush Admin, which coincided with the economic downturn.

Continue to believe that the Dems will stay in power. Polls speak otherwise and that will become very evident in next year’s elections.

Oh and by the way…..it wasn’t Roosevelt’s policies that brought us out of the Great Depression. It was a little thing called WW2. You do remember hearing about that thing, right?

I am done trying to talk with a child. You clearly have no clue what you are talking about.

Add your comment