Comments on: More trouble for U.S. in Pakistan

By: William

William — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:01:59 +0000

Enter your comments here

By: Come all ye children

Come all ye children — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:01:27 +0000

Attention: Attention: All progressive liberals need to sign up for the military immediately. We need to save out annointed one from defeat and disgrace. Hurry progressive liberals join the military today. Help save Obama mm mmm mm!

By: RAMBLE ON!!!

RAMBLE ON!!! — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:52:29 +0000

Is Obama going to be on Letterman this week?

By: Gawingnut

Gawingnut — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:51:40 +0000

Proud American is right. But we’ve been handcuffing our Military since Viet Nam. I can imagine George Patton taking a phone call form Ike: What do you mean I can’t shoot at ‘em in a Mosque?

When the American public, and the 535 dimwitted cowards n Washington realize that war is ugly and people get killed, maybe things will change. But don’t look for it too soon. It’s not the ability, which we have, its the will to win.

By: Proud American

Proud American — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:19:25 +0000

We can not handcuff our military, we are fighting a WAR. T he objective of war is to defeat your enemy by 1. killing him, or 2. pound him in to submission, this cannot be done from the white house. The only role the white house should play is to listen to what the Generals ask for and to give them everything needed to win period.
I think we should tell all citizens of that area they have twelve hours to reach a safe zone or they face total annilation along with all enemy combatants. Once our ENEMY knows we aim to kill him with any and all means, then he will submit or perish.
WE CAN NOT BE WEAK IN THE FACE OF OUR ENEMY.

By: TnGelding

TnGelding — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:20:11 +0000

ck hall

September 30th, 2009
6:11 am

Except for the initial invasion? Yeah, it looks like he realized rather quickly he had made a mistake. Why didn’t he just get out after ousting the Taliban?

By: Pit Bull

Pit Bull — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:18:51 +0000

For all of you “enlightened” folks, it’s called “Multi-Tasking”. I know that’s virgin ground for those of you still celebrating the previous administraton, put people do it daily. If I were Obama, I would not spend another nano-second trying to clean-up the middle-east mess that the son-of-a-bush left behind.

By: ck hall

ck hall — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:11:10 +0000

Sounds like George Bush decisions might have been best in Pakistan/Afghanistan, huh?
Obama is finding out it is relatively easy to get elected but tough to govern! His on the job training continues..Maybe Obama can win the Olympics for Valerie Jarrett and her Real Estate holdings while soldiers are dying..

By: ThePlainTruth

ThePlainTruth — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:26:03 +0000

This is nothing new. Obama said during the campaign that he would go into Pakistan and Hillary chastised him for it. Its amazing what one will say on the campaign trail.

Oh well, the President has more important things to do this week anyway, like jet off to Denmark and argue for the Olympic Games for 2016. Hope the country is still here in 2016.

By: Aristocrat

Aristocrat — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 06:59:57 +0000

US can bomb Pakistan, whenever it wants, the threat of throwing Pakistan into the Stone Age is futile as it is impossibe for US to do that. Leaving aside Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad, rest of Pakistan is already living in the Stone Age. The US cannot harm Pakistan as much as the people (including both the elite and the cliched comman man) is harming Pakistan everyday. Pakistan is already in a mess, I beleive it will be a blessing in disguise, If US intervenes and once for all end the miseries of 170 million animals. Bring it on!