11:55 am December 5, 2012, by Christopher Seward

(Curtis Compton, ccompton@ajc.com)
Follow us on Twitter @AJCBiz
Monday was a busy day for Transportation Security Administration agents on the lookout for weapons at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport.
Within a two-hour period, agents confiscated three guns from travelers and police arrested them, , according to Channel 2 Action News.
So far this year, TSA agents have confiscated 87 guns at the airport, one of the busiest in the nation. By comparison, 69 guns were taken from travelers last year at Hartsfield-Jackson.
According to the TSA website:
Travelers may only transport unloaded firearms in a locked, hard-sided container in or as checked baggage. All firearms, ammunition and firearm parts, including firearm frames and receivers, are prohibited in carry-on baggage.
Sheryl Rexrode was arrested around 10:45 a.m. Monday after agents discovered a .380-caliber handgun in her carry-on. An hour later, Derek Morgan was arrested after he was found with a .32-caliber handgun, which his father said Morgan had forgotten to take out of his bag. Another handgun, a .380-caliber weapon, was discovered shortly afterward in traveler Wendy Parker’s bag.
“It was absolutely a mistake. She’s a sales rep,” Parker’s attorney, Jay Jackson, told Channel 2. “She brings the gun with her in her bag when she’s in her territory. She’s a woman just trying to make sure she’s safe.”
All three travelers were taken into custody and charged with carrying a weapon in unauthorized locations. Bonds ranged from $5,000 to $10,000.
Is there any circumstance under which you think travelers should be allowed to have a gun in a carry-on on a commercial flight?
Get inside Atlanta's and national business news and how it affects you.
Vacation stops, manage subscriptions and more
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement
© 2013 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
214 comments Add your comment
Meli
December 5th, 2012
12:31 pm
If Hartsfield-Jackson and Clayton County want to stop this, they should stop allowing the excuse of ‘I forgot the gun was in my luggage’ and start charging these people with terrorism, the same as we would charge someone who deliberately tried to smuggle a machine gun. If people realized they could actually spend several weeks in a real prison instead of a county jail, they would make sure they ‘remembered’ the gun was in their bag and remove it before packing.
Anonymous
December 5th, 2012
12:44 pm
Meli:
You are an Idiot.
Machine Guns are Legal Georgia as are Virtually ALL other Firearms.
I also Bet that You also have no Idea that United States Federal Law and Georgia Law BOTH Allow Firearms in The Airport, provided; that Firearms that Enter into The Concourse have to be Checked as Luggage Pursuant to Federal Law,
The United States Federal Government Controls ONLY that Portion of The Airport which is known as The Concourse, but Georgia Law Controls The Terminals and The Parking Lot.
Carrying a Weapon or a Long Gun in an Unauthorized Location DOES NOT Include Firearms at Airports, because The Legislature Authorized Firearms on Public Transportation Terminals under Georgia Code 16-11-126(g), BUT The Code Section is Used when a Person Enters into that Portion of The Airport with a Firearm or a Weapon, which is ‘Restricted’ (The Concourses) by Federal Law.
EVC
December 5th, 2012
12:48 pm
People need to be more aware of security requirements when they go into the airport. Mentally spacing out and forgetting a firearm is in their carry on baggage isn’t going to get any sympathy from the TSA or other airport authorities. Being arrested and charged for bail, then the later problematic court appearance which will result in a conviction and fine just isn’t worth the pain and labor!! Be smart!!
Wendy
December 5th, 2012
12:50 pm
I have no issue with people checking unloaded weapons but under no circumstances should weapons be allowed in carry on bags in a commercial flight.
Anonymous
December 5th, 2012
12:53 pm
EVC:
A Person who can Legally Possess a Firearm CAN take a Firearm Actually into The Airport on onto Airport Property, however; They Simply CANNOT take it with Them to or while at or past The TSA Checkpoint.
To put it another way: A Man, with a Firearm at The Ticket Counter, The Shoe Shine Booth, or The Restaurants or Banks or Currency Conversion Center is NOT Committting a Crime.
BUT…., The same Man Suddenly Commits a Crime if He takes that Firearm with Him to or past The TSA Checkpoint that Seperates The Terminal from The Concourse.
Ward
December 5th, 2012
12:58 pm
Guns don’t kill people, people with guns kill people. I hope Georgia’s carry law – and all others like it – is repealed or overturned. The right to bear arms has been affirmed by the Supreme Court, so you are allowed to. But keep them at home, locked away from your kids, and don’t take them somewhere that you can shoot me. I’m not armed!
SouthernLadyGA
December 5th, 2012
1:10 pm
I do not believe these people “really forgot” they had a gun in their carryon…time to start fining them to the max.
If they truly forgot …they should not be allowed to own a gun!
Larry Hatcher
December 5th, 2012
1:14 pm
Carrying a gun requires you to not forget you have it on your person.
pistolpete
December 5th, 2012
1:19 pm
As a frequent flier and gun toter I have had that sinking feeling that there might me a gun in my laptop bag from a road trip, I have stopped in the check in area a few times to go through my bag, I have a place I secure my pistol in my truck when parked at airport and double check it when I am leaving.
Imon Lylooking
December 5th, 2012
1:23 pm
Taking a gun to an airport that clearly does not allow guns is selfish. When individuals make the decision to pack a gun into their carryon luggage, and when they are caught, they divert resources away from agencies that are actually charged with providing a safe travel experience: the TSA and the local police.
If a traveler wants to carry a gun, purportedly it is not for use in a safe airport, but instead for use at their end destination. Here’s a simple, and unselfish solution: ship the gun (unloaded, of course), and, if shipping the ammunition is illegal, simply buy some when you arrive at your destination. More complex, yes; selfish, no.
According to accepted economic theory, we all act in accord with individual greatest utility. If that is true, and within reason, it seems to be, then an incentive needs to be applied to prevent increasing numbers of guns showing up at checkpoints. Alternatives include, as Meli indicated, real prison time, or stiff fines. I think stiff, very stiff, fines are the right approach.
JR
December 5th, 2012
1:23 pm
No Ward, EVIL people with guns kill people. Guess, what? You take the gun away from them, they’re still evil. And they’e still going to find a way to kill people. And probably in a more efficient way that using a firearm.
9/11 and Oklahoma City were the 2 worst mass killings in US history. And the worst mass killing at a school in the US happened in Bath, MI in 1927. NONE of those involved guns. If the perps in those cases had only used guns, there likely would have been fewer deaths.
dar
December 5th, 2012
1:24 pm
Anonymous
Why carry a gun to the Airport anyway, just because you can? That’s exactly what’s wrong with society today. I will do this and that, because I can, that get’s people in a lot of trouble.
SK
December 5th, 2012
1:29 pm
Yes, people who are dumb enough to try and bring guns on any airplane in this day and age, should be subject to a short prison term (no life snetences please) of 12-18 months to make sure that they have a stiff reminder to never do it again.
JR
December 5th, 2012
1:32 pm
Hey dar, it’s sort of difficult to check a firearm if you don’t first bring it into the airport. Duh!
Don't Tread
December 5th, 2012
1:39 pm
“Why carry a gun to the Airport anyway, just because you can?”
Why post on a blog, just because you can?
It’s called “individual rights”…something lefties abhor greatly when others exercise them.
Back on topic…While I’m all for individual rights, carrying a gun onto the passenger cabin of an airplane is a bad idea simply because the consequences of a miss (or misfire) outweigh the benefits. Checking it is also a bad idea (although legal) due to the fact that many things of value in checked baggage seem to magically disappear by the time you reclaim it at your destination, and there is no way for you to tell who is the guilty party.
Shipping it insured to yourself or someone trustworthy is a better option…you have legal recourse if your gun comes up missing in transit.
George
December 5th, 2012
1:43 pm
Hell no no guns on the plane please . What in the hell for
JFKDawg
December 5th, 2012
1:46 pm
You can’t be serious? Board a plane with a weapon? Are you insane? Not only should they be arrested but beaten about the head and shoulders for being stupid enough to bring one to the airport. At least taze them a few times, damn.
Tag
December 5th, 2012
1:47 pm
It only makes sens that small caliber Hand guns say up to and including 45 caliber and sawed off shot guns should be allowed on planes to handle unruly Attendants or Pilots.
wtf
December 5th, 2012
1:47 pm
Don’t taze me bro.
Shar
December 5th, 2012
1:48 pm
The only travelers who should carry guns on a commercial aircraft are air marshals.
If you are too stupid and careless to remember that you have a lethal weapon in your carryon, you are too stupid and careless to own one.
However, I’d rather not pay to imprison such stupid and careless people. Unless there is any reason to believe that the gun was being brought on board on purpose, a huge fine is the appropriate punishment for such reckless disregard for public wellbeing.
Astrid
December 5th, 2012
1:48 pm
Right on, Meli! And Anonymous, like all “anonymouses” YOU are an idiot.
Shar
December 5th, 2012
1:49 pm
And their carry license should be revoked. Stupid and careless people should not be entrusted with guns.
Chuck
December 5th, 2012
1:50 pm
Yes,you should be able to carry a firearm. However, If you “forget” that you are, you have no business owning one.
BubblesB
December 5th, 2012
1:51 pm
If the passenger isn’t an air marshall, there is absolutly no reason to carry a firearm on a commercial jet. That’s all we need – OK Coral in the sky.
CC
December 5th, 2012
1:52 pm
if you forget your firearm, then you should be excorted out not arrested. To be arrested is stupid as common sense left long ago.
donna nations
December 5th, 2012
1:53 pm
Maybe they should pass out guns to all passengers boarding a plane. Then we would all be protected and able to defend ourselves by shooting back. In these days and times you have to look after yourself!
CC
December 5th, 2012
1:54 pm
I agree, Donna Nations.
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
1:55 pm
JR writes: “You take the gun away from them, they’re still evil. And they’e still going to find a way to kill people. And probably in a more efficient way that using a firearm.”
Really? What kind of methods are you thinking about here? I’m inclined to take the guns away and let the “evil” people find some other way to do their damage. You gun nuts are always yammering on about how you can kill someone with a knife, a brick, etc., just as easily as you can with a gun, and I ask, why the hell don’t you just carry a brick around? That would make me a lot more confortable sharing a society with you.
By the way, on the idea that only “evil” people kill people with guns: just recently a friend of a friend (34 y.o.) was shot to death by the drunken ex-husband of his girlfriend, who was blacked out drunk and didn’t even remember shooting the guy, much less his “reason” for doing so. I’m sure he considered himself a completely responsible gun owner and thought he had a “right” to deadly force.
Chuck
December 5th, 2012
1:55 pm
@ Anonymous, Very well said!
mary
December 5th, 2012
1:59 pm
If you can’t remember that you’re carrying a gun, you should be able to own one.
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
1:59 pm
@Dont tread – the law is that you unload the gun, declare the gun, & they place a red tag in your luggage with it, and they visually inspect the luggage to make sure it is lockable and hardsided so thieves cannot steal the gun (they can steal the entire suitcase, but thats a problem for another day). As a legal licensed gun owner, I do not want guns in the cabin (even in Air Police’ hands ) because of pressurized cabins….Stun guns, etc, can do the job without blowing a hole in the airplane…
Dork Squad
December 5th, 2012
2:01 pm
People who forget or accidentally carry guns into airports are in fact jerks who despise the Government and think the laws don’t apply to them. They consider the Constitution the best read ever, and want to turn this country back in time. Throw the bums in jail and let them bond out on a minimum 10k cash bond.
That’ll teach the little ***holes to test the Government.
she-boone
December 5th, 2012
2:02 pm
I can see this easily happening…I’m a CWP holder and carry, but I always double check that I don’t have a weapon in any of my bags before leaving my car. I did, once, travel with a few rounds of ammo, but it went undetected thankfully.
spfuller
December 5th, 2012
2:03 pm
Easy fix and in some cases this does happen, however, there is some discretion currently involved. In order to legally carry the weapon in a concealed manner in the first place, they must have a “carry permit.” All of these situations revolve around carrying a concealed weapon in some sort of carry on luggage. Georgia law should require the loss of their “carry permit” without discretion in such cases. They will never forget about their concealed weapon again. In order to have a “carry permit,” they must be able to show the responsibility necessary to justify that permit.
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
2:05 pm
@ Who shot JR – Societal laws are not made based on aberrations, but on the norm. I am sorry for what happened to your friend, but to base a law that is one of the founding principles of this nation on something that happens, while sad, to a tiny miniscule proportion of our citizenry, is asinine. And speaking of ex boyfriends, husbands, etc. I will never understand a woman’s anti gun viewpoint. The only defense a 105 lb woman has against a 200 lb (or 165 or….) ex is to be trained and able to use a firearm to defend herself.
Rich
December 5th, 2012
2:06 pm
Ah right, the same old tired “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” And how MANY people could the average individual with a mid-life crisis kill without a gun, compared to the same individual without one? (See the Batman movie incident earlier this year – 12 innocents dead from a washed out PhD candidate). Let’s call a spade a spade folks – Guns have one intended purpose only – to cause bodily HARM. If you’re mad at your wife, don’t take it out on me. Gun-nuts who bring guns as a CARRY-ON to the airport are asking for it! Period.
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
2:07 pm
spfuller – agreed.
Luny
December 5th, 2012
2:08 pm
Everytime i go to the airport to pick someone up, I usually meet them at baggage claim and I make it a point to open carry. I have a valid GA Firearms License, and it’s legal to do so. As far as firearms on a plane? Nope, can’t support that.
clay
December 5th, 2012
2:09 pm
Guns do not belong in any airport or on ANY passenger plane. Blows my mind that people still forget about 9/11.
Alphare
December 5th, 2012
2:13 pm
Yes, Donna, I 100% agree.
It should be a federal requirement for restaurants/airports/courts/schools etc to have guns ready. Every one should be handed one before entering any public places so that we are all self-protected.
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
2:15 pm
Markie: I do not believe that the incident I mentioned represents an “aberration,” just as I don’t agree that the Constitution guarantees your right to carry around a device intended only to cause grievous harm to people.
You gun nuts are masters of selective reading, both of recent events and the Constitution. Every time someone shoots themselves or a loved one, every time kid kills some other kid while playing with the gun that their parents foolishly kept for “protection,” every time some freak kills a kid over “loud music,” every time some psycho mows down innocents in a movie theater, you can count on the gun crowd’s knee-jerk reaction: “but that’s an aberration!” I’m not buying it: uncontrolled violence and carnage are not an aberration in the society that you advocate for, but are instead it’s bottom line.
*~_L_~*
December 5th, 2012
2:16 pm
A gun on the plane may have stop 9-11……
Alphare
December 5th, 2012
2:17 pm
Luny,
I have to disagree with you. Everybody on an air plane should be armed with a gun. We should start with kids in kindergarten once they can lift up a gun. Little people are more vulnerable and especially need self-protection, you know.
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
2:18 pm
Luny writes: “Everytime i go to the airport to pick someone up, I usually meet them at baggage claim and I make it a point to open carry.”
Wow, your devotion to the public good is almost Christlike. Thank you SO MUCH for endangering me and my family in the baggage claim area. I’m glad to sacrifice my sense of safety for your juvenile sense of phallic empowerment.
Anon
December 5th, 2012
2:18 pm
Meli-
You are one of the most ignorant people I have come across in recent memory, with people like you voting its no wonder our country is in the shape it is.
Reality
December 5th, 2012
2:21 pm
A rationally thinking person would recognize that it is stupid to allow guns in airports or on airplanes.
However, this is Georgia. We are not raional at all. So, let everyone have guns everywhere. Let a gunfight break out in the airport or in a middle school, or in a church. This seems to be what Georgia wants…
David Puddy
December 5th, 2012
2:22 pm
Clearly, this is Obama’s fault due to his pandering of folks who don’t work and his ‘tax the rich’ schtik.
kimmer
December 5th, 2012
2:23 pm
@meli: Charge them with terrorism? Really? Why stop there. Charge the people who try to carry more than 3 oz of liquid or forget about a pocket knife too. After all, 911 was accomplished with box cutters! Believe me, for an ordinarily law abiding citizen, to have to go through the humiliation and inconvenience of being publicly arrested and hauled off to jail is prevention enough. I’ll bet for those that it happens to they don’t forget again. Out of the millions of air travelers what is the percentage of people who mistakenly leave a firearm in their bag? I’ll bet its less than 0.0001% It is so low that anytime it happens it makes the news so it sounds like the current laws are deterrent enough.
Alphare
December 5th, 2012
2:24 pm
Anon,
people in Pakistan and Afghanistan can have guns anywhere as I know of. I even saw pictures of people carrying guns on their back while eating. No wonder they are more advanced than us.
RGB
December 5th, 2012
2:24 pm
“… If you “forget” that you are, you have no business owning one.”
Ever forget to turn off your cell phone before you enter a church (excludes the secular left) or business?
People who carry concealed weapons do so on a daily basis and forget they are even carrying. This is especially true for the caliber of weapons noted in the story: they are light, concealable “purse guns”. These people are not using their weapons to harm others, rather they simply forgot.
If you were to think about it, you’d realize that these people are likely above average in terms of their obeying the law since a carry permit requires a GBI background check. So they aren’t plagued with arrest records and mental deficiencies, which contrasts with most anti-Second Amendment liberals.
This doesn’t excuse them from the legal consequences, but those here who lambast people who forget to disarm are the same ones whose cell phones ring inappropriately and who couldn’t find their turn signal indicator with instructions and a 15 minute headstart.
Question
December 5th, 2012
2:25 pm
Why did we need to know that one of the people worked at Chick-fil-A.?
IMO, if you have a licence to carry, then you should be able to carry. I think it should be tougher to obtain a licence to carry.
The Truthe
December 5th, 2012
2:25 pm
Are we looking at the real problem here or just looking for another excuse to attack people ?
1. Mr Seward made darn sure to announce that a Chick- Fil-A employee was among those caught carrying a gun on Monday, you neglected to mention who the other people worked for, I wander why ? We seem preoccupied by assuming that people forget they are carrying a gun in there bags as they travel, we should be celebrating that the guns are not making it past the check points. we should be more concerned with the fact that a restaurant employee can gain access to a secured area to be able to throw eggs at a bus, lets get our priorities right.
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
2:25 pm
“This seems to be what Georgia wants…”
It’s not what Georgia wants. It’s what a small and radical minority have managed to achieve, in spite of common sense. I hope that the citizens of Georgia and the US someday realize that radical gun advocates, with their claims of constitutional protection, are leading us all down a path to a more violent and dangerous society.
Texas Gravy
December 5th, 2012
2:27 pm
Buy 2 bags, one for the guns and one for the clothes. Only take the clothes one to the airport. That way you never “forget”.
Bobo
December 5th, 2012
2:27 pm
If everyone WAS packing heat, I guarantee that there would be far fewer crimes committed. Armed robberies? Probably down by 80%. Impulse murders? Probably down, since someone would have to consider that they may get taken out first. Everyone has a gun in Switzerland and how often do you hear about crime there?
However, I must say that guns in carry-ons might be a bit stupid because some idiot is going to leave one loaded and it’s going to go off. It’s the same type of idiots that get the gun control lobby screaming at the rest of us. However, I do think that guns in carry-ons would pretty much eliminate any chance of highjacking if enough people carried them. 911 would’ve never gone down that way.
BobV
December 5th, 2012
2:28 pm
Why not explosive or nuclear bombs on planes, or chemical and biological weapons? Maybe the airlines could provide them…
Don't Tread
December 5th, 2012
2:30 pm
WHO SHOT JR: I hope you are a good victim the next time you are robbed or assaulted, and give the attacker what they want. And even if you do that, they might shoot you anyway.
But seeing as you you are adamantly against the right of self-defense (you know, for the “public good”, your “sense of safety” and all that), that would be poetic justice.
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
2:30 pm
well, who shot, we certainly are not going to be able to have a conversation that has any dose of reality, obviously. As a 54 year old grandfather of 3, and numerous service awards for community volunteering, I dont in any way qualify as a “gun nut”; Suffice it to say, I will not waste my breath trying to educate someone who is (a) hysterical about discussing anything to do with guns, and will not apply any logic or reason, (b) labels people automatically without making an effort at a calm discussion of facts or getting to know their views, and (c) cares so little about the principles his freedom is based on that he refers to it as “selective reading”.
Roy
December 5th, 2012
2:32 pm
I’m 74 and have never had a thought about having a gun, much less carrying one. I think all you gun-toters have seen too many John Wayne ( or whatever ) movies and have the belief that they somehow represent reality. I’m fine with the second amendment, but I think they should have added that those with diminished mental capacity shouldn’t be allowed to have a gun. Idiots!
RGB
December 5th, 2012
2:32 pm
People such as “Reality” (yours must be pathetic) should know that it is almost unheard of that a person with a concealed carry permit gets involved in a gunfight. If I’m wrong, send me a few links within the next 5 minutes supporting your assertion.
In addition, violent crimes decline when a state introduces concealed carry capability because criminals realize their next prospective victim may be armed. Indeed two of the three individuals named in the accompanying story are women which means that women aren’t easy marks–unless you disarm them as you are suggesting you would.
Regarding “Georgia is a bad place to live because only idiots live there”, we’ve heard this tired one over and over and over again. And I’ll give the same reply others give: “Delta has a flight out in 5 minutes. See that you are on it.” The state’s collective IQ would escalate just a bit with your leaving.
BTW, Anonymous is 100% spot-on, offered pertinent specific information that would be of value if you’d take a moment to read and comprehend it. But that wouldn’t change your feeeeeeeeelings.
sword ear
December 5th, 2012
2:33 pm
Who Shot JR
I am pretty sure one of the followers of Jesus Christ cut off the Centurians ear when they came to arrest Jesus….hmmm, that was a good shot with his sword! I am not sure what is best in this case, but if you are not licensed in the state you are flying to, then what? I know the folks on the 911 planes probably wish they had a gun in their possesion….
mambo
December 5th, 2012
2:35 pm
Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. And, an armed society is a polite society. I’m fine with loaded guns on a plane, especially by all the crew members. People who are licensed to carry in GA have passed a lot of background checks and are advocates for gun safety and gun responsibility and would pose no problem in a plane or in the terminal.
Alphare
December 5th, 2012
2:35 pm
Bobo,
I believe the most important place to have guns handed out is in the football stadium. Like UGA’s Sanford stadium. Guns should be sold cheaply before the game so that 100 thousands people are all armed.
People are more vulnerable as viewers are extremely focused, while criminals/nuts/drunkards like to get into the game among the mostly innocent citizens.
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
2:36 pm
I’m fine with the second amendment, but I think they should have added that those with diminished mental capacity shouldn’t be allowed to have a gun.
Roy, that is part of the federal background checks, as well as most state laws.
Marshall Kerlin
December 5th, 2012
2:38 pm
Hilarious!! almost had me – assume this question is a joke. Asking if we want to be on a flight with passengers with loaded guns? Amazing this question could even be asked.
GTKSig
December 5th, 2012
2:38 pm
Who Shot JR: You seem to be under the impression that the people who are committing all these heinous crimes are the law abiding citizens who went through a perfectly legal process to obtain a Weapons Carry License. I would really enjoy reading some of your sources proving that anyone in Georgia legally carrying a firearm was responsible for murdering someone. The fact is the people who lawfully obtain a license are not the people who are committing these crimes. Criminals commit crimes. Taking away firearms from those who legally obtained them is not the answer. Narcotics are illegal, yet somehow criminals still find a way to obtain them. Taking away our right to bear arms would only leave us defenseless against criminals who would still find ways to get their hands on guns.
RGB
December 5th, 2012
2:38 pm
Roy,
You should thank God that you never had to defend yourself against someone who would do you arm. But if someone kicked your door in, what would you do? Call the police? What would they do? Oh, that’s right, they have g u n s.
Regarding adding a diminished capacity provision, if you knew anything about having a concealed carry permit you would know that just such a provision exists in Georgia, but rather than doing the research you jumped to a conclusion. Perhaps you have diminished mental capacity.
Ole Roy, read these incidents from newspapers across the country where armed citizens used weapons to defend themselves and their families. BTW, put on your glasses.
http://www.americanrifleman.org/BlogList.aspx?cid=25&id=21
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
2:39 pm
Oh, wait: another responsible gun owner! ATLANTA (AP) — A chance encounter at a Georgia gas station left a 65-year-old woman dead and a 73-year-old man facing a murder charge after authorities say the woman’s car and his motorized wheelchair bumped and he opened fire, police said Wednesday
Motorcyclist
December 5th, 2012
2:41 pm
All pilots should be armed.
Anyone else that is so clueless that ‘they forgot they had it’, well what was even the point of carrying it if you don’t even remember having it? Go to jail and think about it for a while, like you should have been thinking when you were standing in the line walking up to the metal detector. How can you not remember it?
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
2:43 pm
Don’t tread: “I hope you are a good victim the next time you are robbed or assaulted.”
Thanks for the good thoughts buddy. For your part, I hope you are a good cowboy, get to your pistol first and manage to not provoke someone else into shooting you in response. And I hope you are responsible with your gun during the 99.999999999 percent of the time that you are not in any danger of being “robbed or assaulted.” It sure seems like for every story about someone successfully defending themselves with a gun, there are four or five about someone using a gun irresponsibly, to the fatal detriment of themselves or an innocent person.
NuclearJim
December 5th, 2012
2:43 pm
I just used the French to English online translator. Meli indeed translates as “idiot”. Case closed.
Yes. but only...
December 5th, 2012
2:44 pm
…if they promise not to use it to hijack a plane…
Shane
December 5th, 2012
2:46 pm
According to Hartsfield’s own website the airport handled 3,414,003 outbound domestic passengers and 379,235 outbound international passengers in September alone. The article stated 87 guns over the past 11 months, an average of seven a month. That’s an incident rate of .000001%.
People aren’t perfect and this isn’t even close to being a statistically important issue. Take a moment for some perspective.
Bob
December 5th, 2012
2:46 pm
Yes, all circumstances, unless they are a legitimate prisoner in transport. Ban the gun bans. They are unlawful and misguided. Real criminals don’t give two craps about the laws. As this article shows, only law-abiding citizens get stuck with this mess.
Pirate
December 5th, 2012
2:46 pm
It has always been my opinion that if you cannot remember that you have a handgun on your person or in a piece of luggage, then you should not be allowed to own a %$&$@* gun.
Texas Gravy
December 5th, 2012
2:46 pm
Maybe we should be like NY and have Mayor Reed outlaw forgetting you have a gun in your bag so it doesn’t happen, just like Bloomberg outlawed 16oz cups so people won’t get fat. Come to think of it, he should have outlawed hurricanes.
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
2:47 pm
“But if someone kicked your door in, what would you do? Call the police? What would they do? Oh, that’s right, they have g u n s.”
Yep, and they are the only people who should have them. The more you gun freaks manage to flood our society with weapons, the more dangerous our society becomes. By the way, I wonder how many victims of home invasions who owned guns actually managed to get to them in time to do any good? I wonder how much more likely an armed criminal is to shoot you if you are pointing a gun at him? You can take your chances with the gun, I’ll take my chances without one. It’s worked pretty well for me for more than four decades. And when we are sharing public space together, please leave your deadly and unnecessary toy at home where it belongs.
Luny
December 5th, 2012
2:49 pm
JR – I would be more than happy to stand by while you or family are robbed, assaulted or worse, whether in the baggage claim or elsewhere. When you or your family is attacked, please, just let me know that you believe i should not have a firearm, and i’ll gladly walk away as opposed to intervening. that really goes to all you whining liberals that think only gov’t should have guns. Just let me know and i won’t do a damn thing to assist you or your family in a time of need.
MOLON LABE
JANICE
December 5th, 2012
2:50 pm
NOT ON THE FLIGHT/PLANE itself. If they wish to put it in the luggage which will NOT be on board, so be it.
ET
December 5th, 2012
2:51 pm
I don’t care anymore. I want anarchy.
Luny
December 5th, 2012
2:52 pm
You do understand that the 2nd amendment was written so the people would be able to protect themselves from a tyrannical government, right? If the government (aka police) are the only ones that should be allowed to have guns, what would that lead to? History is a great educator. If you read through history and look at the long list of despots and tyrants that have terrorized their own people, they all had one thing in common – they disarmed the people. An unarmed populace has no recourse against a tyrannical government.
Luny
December 5th, 2012
2:53 pm
JR – there is your first problem, guns are not toys
I hate guns
December 5th, 2012
2:54 pm
This just proves that smart people do stupid things many times.
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
2:54 pm
Luny: please, don’t pretend that your macho posturing is done with the public good in mind. Your behavior is selfish and paranoid and our society would be saner and safer without people like you in it. Yes, please don’t intervene if I’m being assaulted or robbed in the baggage claim area. I’m willing to take that chance. Besides, if you start acting like a cowboy, someone’s likely to get shot, and that could be me or someone I care about.
“Why don’t we dump ‘em people, to the bottom of the sea
Before some old fool come around here, want to shoot either you or me”
That’s a little reminder of a time when Southern white people still had a little common sense.
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
2:57 pm
“An unarmed populace has no recourse against a tyrannical government.” This is more hollow rhetoric from the gun crowd. No one is arguing with your right to keep a long gun at home–for protection, squirrel hunting, and protecting yourself against the gub’mint and the U.N. when they come to get you.
Lynn
December 5th, 2012
2:58 pm
To all the people named Anonymous/Anon who are name-calling — at least have the guts to post under your real name. Calling people “an idiot” because they happen to disagree with you is a type of false argument that people engage in when they are either too emotional to stay focused on the issue being discussed or too uninformed to make a logical argument.
HungryCoyote
December 5th, 2012
2:59 pm
Can somebody shoot “Anonymous” in the face? that would be great!
WHO SHOT JR
December 5th, 2012
3:00 pm
Luny: “there is your first problem, guns are not toys”
Actually, it’s only my problem to the extent that irresponsible people are allowed to carry around deadly weapons. It’s painfully obvious that our ability to devise deadly technology has far outstripped our ability to determine who is and who isn’t “responsible” and to know when a person who was formerly determined “responsible” has, for reasons of mental illness, intoxication, whatever, has crossed the line into being “irresponsible.”
dood
December 5th, 2012
3:03 pm
How can you “forget” having a pistol in your bag as you are walking up to a secure area, with signs and pictures that directly cover guns? That excuse is total BS. Fine them to the max, throw them in the can, and take away their license to carry for a year. Before Anonymous attacks me- I’m a gun owner, have a few, and a license to carry. I don’t however carry it to the airport just because.
Alphare
December 5th, 2012
3:04 pm
Lynn,
don’t worry about Anonymous/Anon’s emotional state. He has guns to protect himself.
Ducktown, GA
December 5th, 2012
3:06 pm
I don’t support guns on a flight, but I’m not gonna throw someone in jail for “terrorism” b/c they “forgot” they left their gun in a bag. I could see it happening. The last thing we need to do is make these “stiff” penalties for doing something by mistake. The federal govt most of the time can’t prove the person intended to carry the weapon on the plane any more than they can prove they didn’t intend to. You don’t even really have to arrest the person. What a waste of resources.
We should give them two options assuming they don’t have any prior arrests, warrants, etc.:
1) Go to jail and pay a fine,
or
-Miss the flight and be on the next on along with:
2) Confiscate the gun, put it in “holding” for 5-10 days and have the person pay a fee to pick the firearm back up, no ammunition, when they get back to the airport. This way, if there was really any malicious intent, you’ve avoided it and the person will come back for the gun if they really want it. If they don’t, then the cops probably got someone who is up to something and they can be put on a suspect list. And if say Atlanta is not their “home” airport, there should be a box (that is appropriate box to carry a firearm in) and they can purchase at the airport that goes into checked luggage. The airport would get their “fine” either way and the taxpayers and the individuals would avoid the hassle of a court date.
Sean
December 5th, 2012
3:07 pm
I seriously doubt that these people knew the guns were in the bags because everyone knows you will be screened and that it won’t make it through. For individuals like myself who have a permit to carry it is as simple as purchasing a lockable case and unload the gun and declare that you have it in your checked luggage and your good to go; so to think these people were trying to circumvent the security is stupid.
Ueeediot
December 5th, 2012
3:09 pm
You like to lambast the concealed carry laws.
Fool.
Please explain your logic where a citizen who legally obtains a firearm and legally obtains the proper permit to carry said firearm would do so with the intent to use the firearm to commit a crime.
The fact is, by and large, concealed carry permit holders DO NOT COMMIT GUN CRIMES
Quit badgering law abiding citizens. No, I WILL NOT keep my firearm at home, nor will I relinquish my right to protect myself, because you are too scared or too stupid to understand proper firearm safety.
It has been decided by the same supreme court that upheld Obamacare that it is NOT the job of the police to protect you. (The reason you cannot sue law enforcement for not stopping someone from shooting you) The job of the police to arrest and jail criminals. It is your job to protect you and your family.
JOe Boe
December 5th, 2012
3:10 pm
I wonder if the gun apologists would be as supportive if the person arrested was wearing a turban and a white robe.
The Truthe
December 5th, 2012
3:11 pm
Idiots think if you take guns away from criminals there will be no more crime, these same idiots believe simply putting a lock on a door will stop all burglars.
I promise you my locks do not stop break-ins, but might .44 will.
chest fever
December 5th, 2012
3:12 pm
I forgot I had it. I forgot the safety was off. Oops! Sorry I shot you. Throw the book at them.
scott
December 5th, 2012
3:12 pm
Why did we need to know that one of the people worked at Chick-fil-A.?
Because The AJC is bias to the left and hate CFA.
Gun Toter
December 5th, 2012
3:13 pm
So how many guns did the 9/11 terrorists have? Yeah, that would be none. How about lets arm all passengers and execute actual terrorists on the spot? It does not seem right to punish otherwise law abiding citizens for making a simple mistake.
AltSteve
December 5th, 2012
3:15 pm
I haven’t checked the latest US stats, but I believe drunk people in cars kill drastically more people than drunk people with guns.
There are people who travel on airlines that have need of a firearm. People who transport any item of large value often have carry permits. While I do agree there is not a reason they need to have a gun on the plane, they may need it once arriving at their destination. Airlines need to have a more secure manner to check guns (and other valuables). I know two people who checked guns in Atlanta, but the guns never arrived at their destination.
4minutestilwapner
December 5th, 2012
3:15 pm
What a stupid question. Really, really stupid.
Tap Out
December 5th, 2012
3:16 pm
I was gonna make a comment, but when I read someone compare forgetting to turn off your cell phone with forgetting where your gun is…..I realized this forum is not for the intelligent.
Ueeediot
December 5th, 2012
3:17 pm
@ Lynn,
The occasion does occur when people who think a lot, but dont know much of anything, bring arguments to the discussion that are based purely in emotion and are totally illogical. Others bring arguments and comments that are just illogical.
This has nothing to do with name calling or even. Its just a fact that those people are idiots, or probably more accurately are morons, and should be identified as such.
A common problem in today’s internet blogging society is the mix of the emotional thinkers and the logical thinkers. It really is like mixing the French and the Italian and expecting them to easily communicate.
Many people have all the reference material of the whole of the history of humanity at their fingertips and still believe it is necessary themselves to think through all of life’s problems. They have no principles whatsoever. They just think. They dont know a damn thing.
Today’s blogging society is idiocracy in action.
chest fever
December 5th, 2012
3:17 pm
Every month somebody goes nuts on a plane has to be restrained by other passengers. What if that person had a gun? What if another passenger had a gun and thought that squeezing off a shot in a plane was a good idea? Again, throw the book at them. I have nothing against law abiding gun owners. These people are not law abiding.
RCA
December 5th, 2012
3:18 pm
Enter your comments here
Question
December 5th, 2012
3:19 pm
Scott: I agree.
atln8tiv
December 5th, 2012
3:23 pm
The right to carry a gun comes with responsibilities, first and foremost knowing where your gun is at all times and making sure it is secured. As a woman with a gun permit who often travels solo, I should be allowed to transport my UNLOADED (and trigger-locked) gun in a checked bag, but not in my carry-on luggage.
That said, it is every gun-owner’s responsibility to make sure they are familiar with the gun laws of other states they may travel to as well. Not all states allow individuals to carry concealed firearms and even if a state does allow it, there’s no guarantee that state will recognize a GA permit. You can check the reciprocity status of other states here:
http://www.georgiacarry.org/cms/georgias-carry-laws-explained/frequently-asked-questions/#Reciprocity
Ueeediot
December 5th, 2012
3:24 pm
I haven’t checked the latest US stats, but I believe drunk people in cars kill drastically more people than drunk people with guns.
_________________________________________________________________________________
And yet no one calls for the restriction on car owners or the licensing of liquor buyers. In fact, we still have ice chests full of beer within 100 feet of every gas pump in America.
Tinala
December 5th, 2012
3:24 pm
There is no excuse for carrying a weapon on a commerical flight. If you feel the need to arm yourself, then I suggest you book a lfight on a private jet and ehen you can take an arsenal with you on your flight.The Mayor stated clearly that the airport was off limits to weapons and if anyone is caught having a weapon inside the airport they would be arrested. So there you have it, have a gun at the airport, get ARRESTED!
Dawg Fan!!
December 5th, 2012
3:25 pm
Meli is an Idiot. It was said before, I just want to say again
Reality
December 5th, 2012
3:25 pm
@RGB –
You are really funny. You want to compare a gun to a cell phone? You want to compare a gun to a car blinker? Really?
There are different degrees of crime. In this case, I do think that a gun is just a tad more important than a car blinker….
ATLWmn
December 5th, 2012
3:25 pm
Anonymous:
You Don’t Need to Capitalize Every Word in a Sentence. See How Childish This Looks?
That’s all folks. Call me the grammar police, but there’s no sense in going the extra mile to capitalize and make yourself look dumb when it’s not necessary to get your point across. Incidentally, spelling and grammatical mistakes actually take away any credibility you might have. Just a friendly reminder.
edawg
December 5th, 2012
3:25 pm
I’m honestly torn on the gun control debate and have been for a while. To those who think we should be able to have assault weapons, do you also think we should be able to have weapons-grade plutonium? If not, why and where do you draw the line? And wouldn’t that line be “gun control”?
Road Scholar
December 5th, 2012
3:26 pm
If TSA stops you and you have a gun, take the gun away and don’t give it back, fine them a healthy fine, revoke their license to carry and then slap them upside the head. Stupidity should be painful for those who break the law/rules, not those of us that follow them.
Carry guns on board..give them to all passengers..Really? When some jerk fires and the cabin decompresses, make sure the one who fired goes out the hole. Again, stupidity should be painful to those who practice it! Donna, you are a paranoid idiot for even suggesting that; people should not kid/ be satirical about this!
Mike Crane
December 5th, 2012
3:27 pm
On September 11, 2001 a lot of people would have been better off if one or more passengers had a firearm with them on their flight with ammo. Prior to around 1965 it was not illegal to do so and when did high jackings start? 1966. How many people will have to die to satisfy the “liberals” desire to protect you from law abiding citizens? To be determined and still counting …
Ueeediot
December 5th, 2012
3:29 pm
edawg, you are far late to this conversation.
Please google DC vs Heller and catch up.
oldtimer
December 5th, 2012
3:33 pm
Chicago, New York, Washington D.C….all locations that proved controlling guns does not make a city/state safer…quite the opposite.
But, I really do not want them on a plane.
RCA
December 5th, 2012
3:34 pm
What I wonder about this article is why was it necessary to identify the place of employment and job title for only one of the three people who had guns confiscated.
scott
December 5th, 2012
3:35 pm
edawg
December 5th, 2012
3:25 pm
No cause you can’t protect yourself with plutonium.-In the sand.-No. Anything more?
just the truth
December 5th, 2012
3:35 pm
I’m a little worried about this “anonymous” guy. Hope he doesn’t ride with me !!
dave
December 5th, 2012
3:36 pm
I forgot it was in my bag, how can you forget your gun is in your bag.. it seems many people have a bad memory, They all use that poor excuse
Ed Graham
December 5th, 2012
3:36 pm
“Guns don’t kill people. Husbands who come home early do.” (Larry the Cable Guy)
Mamibo
December 5th, 2012
3:36 pm
@Tap Out – You took the words right out of my mouth.
mike
December 5th, 2012
3:36 pm
Why is that everyone who hates guns refer to firearm owners as “gun nuts”? I own a tv, does that make me a “tv-nut”? I own several firearms and I use them only for target practice because they are fun to shoot. I occasionally carry but I’m starting to do it more. People rarely look at me twice when I do. The notion that people freak out if they see someone carry is false.
Gunluvr
December 5th, 2012
3:38 pm
I’ll carry my gun wherever I want to, whenever I want to because Georgia law and the 2nd Amendment says I can; try to arrest and stop me and I’ll sue your ass in Federal Court.
edawg
December 5th, 2012
3:38 pm
Way to dodge the question Ueeediot.
By the way, that name is perfect for you. People would know it without even having to ask.
edawg
December 5th, 2012
3:39 pm
Scott,
You can absolutely protect yourself with plutonium.
AG
December 5th, 2012
3:41 pm
I would say it would be ok to carry a gun on a commercial flight IF you have a concealed weapons permit for your state (state you are flying out of) and that state you are going to reciprocates that permit.
N2thaIzzo
December 5th, 2012
3:42 pm
Ban all guns… make people learn how to fight. This country is full of pu55ie5 that want guns for protection because they can’t protect themselves any other way..
CRBA
December 5th, 2012
3:44 pm
Do we think carrying a gun on carry on luggage should be allowed? Is this a serious question? The answer is so obvious, that where ever you go outside the US, it won’t even be asked. OF COURSE NOT. Is there a reason for you to be carrying one in your carry on luggage? Not one reason. Is there a reason not to? Yes, security. Americans, guns are not toys. Grow up. The fines should be increased if anything.
scott
December 5th, 2012
3:45 pm
edawg,
May be you can but I have no idea how to use that stuff. Seriously!
Drexel Gal
December 5th, 2012
3:45 pm
Take Amtrak.
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
3:49 pm
edawg, right now in Syria, citizens armed with nothing but guns are fighting, and appear to be winning against a despotic dictatorship. They dont have tanks, helicopters, mortars, artillery. Just guns. But they have a damn good chance of winning their freedom back. If that doesn’t explain it, well….nothing ever will. I hope and pray something like that never comes to pass in this country, but history is very long, governments dont seem to learn, and history, unfortunately, repeats itself over time.
scott
December 5th, 2012
3:49 pm
N2thaIzzo
December 5th, 2012
3:42 pm
Do you want a 100lb old lady to fight a 250lb young man?
Archie Bunker
December 5th, 2012
3:51 pm
You would eliminate hijackings by allowing everyone to carry a loaded gun on a flight. Kind of like when someone goes into a movie theatre with the intent to kill. I think I heard that somewhere.
jcb
December 5th, 2012
3:51 pm
Hell NO!!
scott
December 5th, 2012
3:51 pm
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
3:49 pm
Exactly!
N2thaIzzo
December 5th, 2012
3:54 pm
^^^ Give the 100lb lady some mase or something. No need for a gun. I think people fail to remember that even if a person is “bad”, that person is still a person. Someones son/daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, mother, or father.
Larry
December 5th, 2012
3:54 pm
The 2nd Amendment grants us the unfettered right to bear arms. It does not specify where or when. The government hates this because it means we can generally take care of ourselves. Of course a person should be allowed to go armed on an airplane. Had that been the case 11 years ago, we wouldn’t have had the 9/11 tragedy at all. The police, etc., don’t prevent crime. If we’re lucky, they avenge it.
edawg
December 5th, 2012
3:56 pm
I’m actually glad to hear that Scott
My point is just that there are varying levels of weapons.
Regardless of how anyone feels, I challenge anyone to logically explain why the second amendment doesn’t at least need to be reworded.
JohnnyReb
December 5th, 2012
3:56 pm
I see the posts are divided between those familiar with firearms and those who probably recoil in horror if presented a handgun.
Carrying a handgun becomes routine like carrying your wallet or purse. It is entirely reasonable that someone who routinely carries can possibly forget to remove the weapon from a bag, especially if hurried.
Instead of throwing the book at people as the anti-gun crowd prefers, how about a background check and if there is no evidence of intent give them a warning the first time that goes in their record. If they do it again, then fine them an amount that clears their memory.
javon
December 5th, 2012
3:57 pm
if I pack my piece and forget it, what am I supposed to do when i get to the airport?
JohnnyReb
December 5th, 2012
4:00 pm
I heard a recommendation the other day that really has merit. Since the 2nd amendment authorizes the ownership and carry of firearms, and that those firearms be used for militia, etc., people who choose not to own a firearm should have to pay a fine for not being able to participate in the militia.
edawg
December 5th, 2012
4:00 pm
Markie Mark,
So basically you think as long as something is a “gun”, we should be able to have it but other more destructive weaponry should be banned? What about grenades?
OhMe, OhMy, what was I thinking
December 5th, 2012
4:00 pm
And these people really expect us to believe it was just an “honest mistake”. People who have weapons simply do not ‘just forget’ they have them. You’d better keep track of it at all times or someone’s liable to take it from you and use it against you.
So, that is where that gun was hiding
December 5th, 2012
4:01 pm
I’ve been searching for that; thank you so much for finding it. Can I give you a reward?
commoncents
December 5th, 2012
4:02 pm
I don’t believe we should be arresting everyone who accidentally carries a gun to the security check… At least, not if they are legally allowed to carry.
And don’t point out the morons who have used guns to kill people at schools/movie theaters/whatever. So what that you can name 5 people who committed crimes with firearms bc they are crazy? When you are talking about a population in the 100s of millions in the US, you are bound to find lunatics, and lunatics don’t need guns to exist.
scott
December 5th, 2012
4:02 pm
Mase only has a very short term effect.The rest of your comment is beside the point.
Sparta_Bubba
December 5th, 2012
4:03 pm
One bullet through the skin of a pressurized airliner at 20,000 ft. would be catastrophic for all including the gun nut. Should we stroke the egos of these gun nuts by being forgiving because they are so insecure they cannot go into the public without carrying a gun? No! Fines, penalties and jail time will make them remember next time and at the same time keep the traveling public safe.
commoncents
December 5th, 2012
4:05 pm
johnnyreb @4:00
hahaha that’s awesome. But now the left will try to tell us you can’t dictate interstate commerce
you’ll have to call it a tax to get it to pass…
Danny
December 5th, 2012
4:06 pm
Every grown person knows NOT to carry weapons to the airport and court house, especially with all that crying that goes on with “safety”.
So if you get caught with a loaded gun you should do jail time just for being a stupid moron.
scott
December 5th, 2012
4:07 pm
Regardless of how anyone feels, I challenge anyone to logically explain why the second amendment doesn’t at least need to be reworded.
I can agree with edawg.I’m sure you are aware our founders had no idea of what “arms” could be invented in the future.
Sparta_Bubba
December 5th, 2012
4:07 pm
Ok Johnny Reb, so a terrorist with a clean record would be able to attempt to bring a gun onto a plane under your scenario and if they are caught, no harm, no foul because they have no record and by your summation their intent was heavenly. But if they are not caught and get onto the plane, there goes the farm. You gun loving nuts are beyond amazement!
chest fever
December 5th, 2012
4:09 pm
If you’re going to keep talking about the 2nd amendment, and forgeting the part about the well regulated militia, then you’re not just talking about guns. It is the right to bear “arms.” Nuclear weapons were part of the “arms” race. Handgrenades are “arms.” If you think it’s logical to allow people on a pressurized airplane to carry guns, then I guess you might as well let people suit up like suicide bombers to go the grocery. There’s a point when it seems crazy – and that’s why people use the term “gun nuts.”
Travis McGee
December 5th, 2012
4:10 pm
The time is near when something is going to happen — a criminal incident where people with a carry permit all pull their guns at the same time to intervene in the criminal situation only to be involved in a circular firing squad or the police will arrive and shoot the wrong person with the gun.
It’s too easy to buy a gun and get a carry permit.
Rob in Atlanta
December 5th, 2012
4:10 pm
Being a frequent traveler airport security can often make you crazy. Occasional travelers are the worst (especially with children). Business travelers (like me) are almost as bad due to cell phones and emails, and texts. I turn my phone off when I get to the security line.
My idea is to have a metal detector at the entrance to the security lines. That way if it goes off the future passenger can and should check to see why. And before they get in line and cause a huge delay. I believe this would speed up all security lines and be relatively inexpensive.
Years ago I bought a razor knife in China for work. I was scraping finishes and coatings off sample products. I left it in my pants pocket. When I was asked to empty my pants at security in a Chinese airport I realized I still had the knife and I pretended to sneeze and ran to the bathroom. My wife told security I was feeling sick (which I really was when I found the knife was still in my pocket). It was an oversight that could have turned very ugly.
Why not let passengers get ready to go through security instead of waiting to find out they have something with them that might cause a delay? I have seen women take 3 or 4 minutes to get their jewelry off. If they passed through a pre-screening area they would have know to remove it before getting in line. The same is true for tools, samples, and many other carry on items.
edawg
December 5th, 2012
4:12 pm
I’m asking for a rocket propelled grenade launcher for Christmas b/c the second amendment protects my right to bear arms. And no, I don’t care that it was written 221 years ago and doesn’t even make sense anymore.
Betty perry
December 5th, 2012
4:12 pm
You know the whole gun thing has gotton so much out of hand. Everybody don’t need to have a gun. Only people that are in law enforcement. Your right to bare arms is so out of control. You got the fools out here just killing everybody.What kind of none sense is this. They have the rights to have a gun, but I don’t have the right to feel safe because somone will get upset with me and just pull out a gun and kill me.
commoncents
December 5th, 2012
4:13 pm
scott @ 4:07
What needs to be changed? It sounds great the way it is:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Wonka
December 5th, 2012
4:13 pm
Sorry folks. Even as a pro-Second Amendment, gun toting and armed citizen…I think anyone who carries a loaded weapon into a TSA checkpoint is an idiot. “I forgot” is not an excuse. Just like if someone were to be injured by a negligent discharge from said weapon, “I forgot” will not hold up in court. Nor will it absolve you of your responsibilty as a firearms owner. It seems like many people want the benefits of the rights without the responsibility of them.
edawg
December 5th, 2012
4:14 pm
scott,
Thanks for seeing my point.
scott
December 5th, 2012
4:14 pm
You gun loving nuts are beyond amazement
The same could be said for you gun hating nuts. Jus sayin……
Betty perry
December 5th, 2012
4:17 pm
You can carry a gun but i cannot have a taser or stung gun? what kind of crazness is this?
edawg
December 5th, 2012
4:17 pm
commoncents,
“It sounds great the way it is”. You’re kidding…right?
How about something like…”Each and every citizen is allowed to keep and bear arms that meet the following qualifications…”
Take out the part about the militia and define what type of arms are allowed. Or just allow everything and I’ll go get my grenade launcher.
commoncents
December 5th, 2012
4:20 pm
Betty perry- My right to carry trumps your opinion on firearms.
Secondly, the people you are afraid of probably don’t have the right to have a firearm to begin with.
“Your right to bare arms is so out of control.” Guess what? It’s your right, too.
scott
December 5th, 2012
4:21 pm
commoncents
December 5th, 2012
4:13 pm
Don’t get me wrong I’m not an “anti”. But the word “arms” didn’t have the same meaning back in the day.
Mike
December 5th, 2012
4:22 pm
RGB says: “Ever forget to turn off your cell phone before you enter a church (excludes the secular left) or business?”
Not very mature to take a swipe at people like that. People on the left go to church too, and many on the right do not.
People on the left are your fellow citizens. Be respectful, please.
Chris
December 5th, 2012
4:23 pm
All of you “No Tolerance” people out there are stupid idiots! People that carry a weapon all the time DO FORGET that they are carrying. When I was a Federal Agent, I carried a weapon all the time, in airports and on flights. I remember like it was yesterday after I left the Federal Government and I went to the airport to pick up my wife I TOTALLY FORGOT that I was carrying a weapon. Thank goodness that I had not tried to pass through security yet and was able to go back out to the car and put it away. These people are NOT criminals and they certainly are NOT terrorists. Times do change and we certainly need the security, but not from these folks. I completely believe that they forgot and they should not be punished in any kind of way. Especially if they have no prior record of offenses. It was just an honest mistake. It happens. Just like the little boy who forgets to take the pocket knife out of his pants and accidentally takes it to school. They end up throwing the book at him and he certainly doesn’t deserve it.
name (required)
December 5th, 2012
4:26 pm
No, a bullethole in the skin of a plane would NOT be catastrophic, you idiots. Do you know what would happen? There would be a hole in the wall, but guess what? There’s ALREADY holes in the wall of a plane. They’re called “doors” and they’re not sealed very well. Ever sit next to an emergency exit? Hear that noise? That’s called “air”. It would just give the pressurized air another venue from which to leave the airplane, but not at any faster pace than it already is at 30,000 feet.
“Explosive decompression” is movie magic….not real life.
scott
December 5th, 2012
4:26 pm
Thanks for seeing my point.
You are welcome edawg! I try to discuss an issue with an open mind.I learn more that way.
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
4:27 pm
logically edawg? we would never agree on the new updated wording….America is too diverse in its beliefs to ever repeat creating a document like the Constitution that would be approved by the states…
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
4:31 pm
“So basically you think as long as something is a “gun”, we should be able to have it but other more destructive weaponry should be banned? What about grenades?”
edawg, there obviously will never be an answer to satisfy you. You will want to escalate ad infinitum. I guess you get to decide that for yourself. Those same guys with guns are doing all they can to capture grenades….whatever a government is going to use against its citizens, it is fair game (in my opinion) for those citizens to use against their government once they have been unfairly attacked.
Roberto
December 5th, 2012
4:34 pm
Also, don’t forget to put your DARTS in checked baggage. Before Sept. 11th I was taken away because my darts, in their case, were in my briefcase. I shudder to think at what they would do to me now? Probably be sent to a gulag in Ludowici.
scott
December 5th, 2012
4:34 pm
America is too diverse in its beliefs to ever repeat creating a document like the Constitution that would be approved by the states…
Well,there IS that!
markie mark
December 5th, 2012
4:34 pm
“I’m asking for a rocket propelled grenade launcher for Christmas b/c the second amendment protects my right to bear arms. And no, I don’t care that it was written 221 years ago and doesn’t even make sense anymore.”
and there we go….edawg has now dropped the pretense of a logical discussion anymore and become his true self.
scott
December 5th, 2012
4:41 pm
and there we go….edawg has now dropped the pretense of a logical discussion anymore and become his true self.
You shouldn’t have used so much logic on him markie!
edawg
December 5th, 2012
4:44 pm
What is illogical about stating that a grenade launcher is an arm? What is illogical about stating that the second amendment was written 221 years ago? What is illogical about stating that the wording doesn’t make sense?
Curzen
December 5th, 2012
4:49 pm
“But keep them at home, locked away from your kids, and don’t take them somewhere that you can shoot me. I’m not armed!”
That’s your own fault. I prefer to not be a victim. I also won’t shoot you, that’s for criminals who don’t care about laws either way. So why do you want to make me a victim as well? Are you going to explain to my daughter why she couldn’t defend herself against that rapist, as you don’t want her to have a gun?
Curzen
December 5th, 2012
4:51 pm
“I’m asking for a rocket propelled grenade launcher for Christmas b/c the second amendment protects my right to bear arms. And no, I don’t care that it was written 221 years ago and doesn’t even make sense anymore”
supreme court opinion holds that the 2nd amendment does not apply to weapons which kill indiscriminately, as in grenades or bombs as an example.
Pete
December 5th, 2012
4:51 pm
First, it isn’t legal, but can’t think of any circumstance under which an individual who is not a law enforcement officer should be allowed to carry a firearm on board a passenger aircraft. While just about any law-abiding citizen can get a carry permit, that doesn’t mean they have the judgement or skill to properly react to an incident on an aircraft should one occur. I’m thinking drunk, unruly passenger, etc. Discharging a firearm in an aircraft in flight is not a trivial matter.
Sara Tonin
December 5th, 2012
4:53 pm
I worked at ATL for nine years after 9/11 and suggested several times that they place signage in the parking lots and at the terminal entrances reminding people of the federal security requirement as it relates to guns. The powers that be at the time always said it “would not be aesthetically pleasing” to do so. By the way, those were the same bumpkins who refused to establish a cell phone lot because it wouldn’t produce revenue, and who refused to lease space to Chick-Fil-A because they would not open on Sundays. Things (and personnel) have changed since then and n ow there is a cell phone lot and Chick-Fil-A plans to open two airport locations in February 2013. Maybe they will reconsider the signage idea??
Hamad Meander
December 5th, 2012
4:53 pm
Get over it people. Fine them and let them go on with their lifes. At least this proves the TSA can detect something dangerous – shouldn’t they be tested every once in a while with a real problem? I would assume each of these people caught with a weapon had a concealed carry permit. If they didn’t, then there is an issue to discuss.
scott
December 5th, 2012
4:55 pm
edawg
December 5th, 2012
4:44 pm
Well you did move from logical discussion to being a bit snarky. Jus sayin……..
Limozena
December 5th, 2012
4:55 pm
I haven’t been in Hartsfield in a while so I’m not current on what signage TSA has in place to warn air travelers about firearms. Whatever it is, it apparently is not working.
I believe most of the gun carriers honestly (stupidly?) forget there is a weapon in their carry-on. One thing TSA could do: the employee who checks boarding passes before you get to the screener checkpoint could pointedly ask every person “Do you have a weapon on your person or in your carry-on?” That one simple question might kickstart some brains into gear and keep a few knuckleheads out of jail.
Donald Baxter
December 5th, 2012
4:57 pm
“It was absolutely a mistake. She’s a sales rep,” Parker’s attorney, Jay Jackson, told Channel 2. “She brings the gun with her in her bag when she’s in her territory. She’s a woman just trying to make sure she’s safe.”
She must have some rough territory! Is much of Georgia really the wild, wild West? Carrying a gun on your person has been shown to decrease one’s safety, not increase it. And a gun in the airport is idiocy. If you can’t remember you HAVE a gun, how could you remember to use it if you can’t remember NOT to bring it through TSA?
scott
December 5th, 2012
5:01 pm
Curzen
December 5th, 2012
4:51 pm
Well said.
edawg
December 5th, 2012
5:02 pm
The argument about needing guns be able to fight off the government is bogus to me. That ship sailed here a long time ago. That might have been a valid argument 100 years ago but not today and probably not as far back as the 1940s or 1930s.
I’m uneasy about that being the case…but it is most definitely the case. Don’t kid yourself.
ylojkt
December 5th, 2012
5:05 pm
Has anyone ever thought of using common sense? These guns (if they have a permit) are completely legal no more than 50 feet away from where these people are screened and arrested. Why can they not just be given the option to go back to their vehicle and secure their gun, or to UPS where they can ship it? In my opinion, the airport or airline should have a way of dealing with this so both passenger and handgun can land at the needed destination.
If the guns are illegal, then you have an issue that is an arrestable offense, but permitted gun owners should be allowed more respect than being arrested.
A lot of people on here act like they’ve never forgotten something they had in their possession before, I know it’s not true with 100% of you. You’ve just forgotten something you’re comfortable with or used to having, same as with many gun owners, knife carriers, pepper spray carriers, etc. You may have completely forgotten that pack of your favorite gum, but if a situation comes up to remind you of it, you’ll know where it is; it’s the same with people who carry weapons comfortably. I carry a knife every day of every year, I use it pretty much daily. I remember I have it on me when I need it, but I don’t walk around repeating in my head “I HAVE A DEADLY WEAPON AND I’LL USE IT IF NECESSARY.” Quite frankly, I forget about it until I need it, same as with these upstanding lady travelers.
I would suspect that these smart ladies carry these guns with them when they drive across the southeast for their jobs, probably keeping the gun within hands reach while driving and transferred to a purse when they reach their destination. Once home and safe from the potential dangers of their travels, I would surmise that they probably just grabbed the gun out of the car and stuck it in their bag to carry into the house, not to use the bag until the next trip. At home safe and gun is out of mind, all pretty normal activity.
My wife is one who is scared of guns, and I can assure you that if she had a traveling job I would insist that she get a permit and carry while on her travels. I can also assure you that if this was the case, she would do something almost exactly like the scenario I described above when she got home; no need to even think about the gun after arriving home safe and sound.
ugaprof
December 5th, 2012
5:06 pm
People who accidentally forget to leave their guns behind aren’t criminals. How about some prominent SIGNS at the entry to the airport (to be seen by people driving in as well as walking in) to remind them? Also, how about some legal way of dealing with a gun you’ve accidentally brought along — such as a way to having it FedExed to your destination or your home?
Frequent Flyer
December 5th, 2012
5:10 pm
I’ll say up front that I was one of the “idiots” who had a gun found in my carry on luggage last year. To say that I felt stupid would be a gross understatement. It was among the dumbest things I have done. Explaining why it was there is pointless but it was an accident and I had no intention or desire to have the gun with me during my travel, i.e. I wasn’t trying to get away with anything. Going through all the legal processes that followed is a suffificient deterrent for me. I ask for no sympathy and make no justification.
What I do ask for is application of reason. I agree that weapons should not be allowed on planes as well as some other places but the harsh penalties suggested by the self righteous bloggers are pretty scary. Had my case gone to a jury trial, I shudder at the thought of what penalties they might have doled out to me. As it was, I’m out over $3000 plus a couple nights in jail for a mistake that put no one at risk. That’s right, no one was at risk. My gun was not going to go on a rampage by itself and neither was I. I have a carry permit because I qualified for it. I have never robbed, shot, stabbed, raped or assaulted anyone. Again, no appeal for sympathy but an appeal for reason. The metal detectors did their job of finding what is not supposed to be there. For the hardened criminal, a couple of nights in the county jail is no big deal. But for a law abiding regular Joe like me who only gets an occasional traffic ticket, the whole experience was a very big deal and something I intend to avoid like the plague.
So, for the “off with their heads” type of bloggers, consider this. Have you ever (even once?) been cited for a moving violation in your car? If not, I’m sure you know a “nice” person who has. Would you have felt immediate jail time was appropriate for your violation? You should demand that the drivers licenses of all offenders (even the first timeers) are permanently revoked with some sort of excessive fine and maybe a few lashes thrown in to boot. Imagine how traffic would improve plus all the lives that would be saved, the energy dependance reduced and all other manner of “good” things that would result. I just saw today that Georgia has had over 1000 people die in car crashes this year. The number of mangled and permanently injured would be approximately 4 – 5 times that figure at least. Fatalities and injuries are a BY PRODUCT of motor vehicle use, i.e. they just happen as a natural result of people driving on the streets and we accept such results as inevitable but choose to keep the cars because they are just so nice to have and use. If television sets had the same record, they would be off the market before you could watch (or possibly star in) the last episode of Jerry Springer. Nearly all crashes are due to someone failing to obey the law. By your logic, these people are too stupid to know that they are operating a motor vehicle improperly and putting the general population in direct risk. Consequently, they should be punished very severely with no possibility to ever operate such a potentially lethal machine again. They have clearly demonstrated their stupidity plus their indifference to public safety. A mistake? No excuse. If you’re too stupid to know you’re breaking the law, you’re too stupid to be driving on public roads. After all, someone could have been killed! In comparison, under no circumstance was anyone going to be hurt by me having my gun with me because it was under my control and I would not allow that. Again, no justification for what I did but my point is that, ALL moving traffic violations, under SOME circumstance, can and do kill people. That’s why they are illegal! So, although I am not a Bible thumper, I’ll borrow from the text. Let he who is without sin cast the first stone. For all of you who want to disarm honest citizens who want to protect themselves and their families, turn in your car first to show you are sincere about public safety. It’s proven to be more likely to kill anyone than my gun is. Otherwise, recognize your hypocracy for what it is and restrict your misinformed ideas to other like minded liberal media drones. As an American, I fully support your right to express any idea but I also support my right to expose narrow minded idiocy for what it is. Let the word twisters and selective memories reply.
edawg
December 5th, 2012
5:12 pm
point taken Curzen
scott
December 5th, 2012
5:15 pm
such as a way to having it FedExed to your destination or your home
That’s against the law ugaprof.
Raiderbeater
December 5th, 2012
5:17 pm
I am a cop.
Half the people on here abhor guns and believe we can save them if a life threatening situation arises. We can’t and won’t.
Big Hat
December 5th, 2012
5:20 pm
When everybody has a gun, we won’t need cops, let alone the TSA. All problems with be settled the old-fashioned way, the right way, the 2nd Amendment way. Think of the cost savings; no cops, no judges, no courthouses, no jails, no lawyers. A win-win for America all the way around.
darkstar3d
December 5th, 2012
5:20 pm
As a traveler thats in an airplane almost 80 times a year, with a checked gun everytime (except flying to those states that don’t honor my carry permit), I fail to see how these folks just “forgot”. No one needs a gun on the flight unless its a military chartered one.
I love the comment above that says its irrational only because its Georgia. Obviously a person who doesn’t understand that 80% of the states in the union, you can carry loaded guns in an airport. Many states you can carry a gun anywhere but where the Feds say you can’t.
scott
December 5th, 2012
5:22 pm
Let the word twisters and selective memories reply
OK,I will. Thanks for the most rational and informative post here today!
scott
December 5th, 2012
5:31 pm
darkstar3d
December 5th, 2012
5:20 pm
Look at FF’s post at 5:10. It can happen!
Me
December 5th, 2012
5:37 pm
Meli
What a moron!
Hamad Meander
December 5th, 2012
5:52 pm
Frequent Flyer – thank you for sharing your experience and proofing that in government, common sense is neither common or sensical.
ESL
December 5th, 2012
6:03 pm
All Concealed Carry Permit holders should be allowed on any flight at any time to any US Destination regardless of the reason they might be carrying a legally owned firearm. Banning firearms from aircraft or in locations near aircraft such as terminals is a violation of every Americans Constitutional rights. Leonard
Todd Smith
December 5th, 2012
7:08 pm
Ok here are my two cents worth: To the people blasting having guns..especially to JR…JR you are right, absolutely chances are you will NEVER need a weapon to defend your self during your life..BUT..what if? what if you do? I couldn’t live knowing I allowed my child or other loved ones being killed or harmed, when if I’d owned a firearm I could have protected them possibly. The thing about gun control is it doesn’t work..Jamaica has banned all firearms in that country for 99% of the population, yet it has the 3rd highest murder rate in the world per capita, Same with El Savador, it has the NUMBER 1 murder rate per capita in the world. The UK put some of the most stringent gun control laws in the world into affect few years back, did the firearm rate go down? sure did, did over all murder rate go down sure did, but guess what? knife murders went up by 50% in two years, deaths by other objects went up by 60% in two years, and now the over all murder rate is creeping up again. Here is the thing, if you look closely at this there is ONE big thing that seems to stand out, at least to me, in all these places, poverty, When you high poverty levels you have high murder rates. Same with US, poverty is going up and so are murder rates and irrational acts. If you do NOT believe start searching and reading and you will see for yourself. People do things when they feel they have no other options, and things are getting this way in america due to crooked politicians and government that doesn’t do it’s job. Do not let the left take your weapons or you will be in the shape of jamaica, el salvador and starting to be UK. One more point, it is pretty much mandatory for every male in Switzerland to own a gun. Yet murder rates are 1.2 per 100,000. Yet poverty the rate is VERY low.
joel
December 5th, 2012
7:09 pm
OK, I really doubt that any of these people purposely tried to smuggle a gun onto the plane. They had a memory lapse because they are human beings. Get over it. They probably weren’t being willfully ignorant and prejudiced like the people who think anyone carrying a gun is a ticking time bomb (that’s only true if they have a badge to go with the gun).
moderate
December 5th, 2012
8:23 pm
The original article confused two different issues, whether guns should be allowed on planes and what to do about these individuals who had guns in their luggage.
On issue #1, I’m a gun owner, target shooter, and have a carry permit. However, our current culture and world situation makes carrying guns on aircraft a very bad idea. I don’t think there’s much disagreement on that particular point.
With regard to “accidentally” having a gun in your carry-on, use a little common sense… These are typically not stupid people, and they are often frequent travelers. We (and they) all know that a gun will almost certainly get detected (and good for that). I travel and use the same bag for trips of many types. Sometimes on a road-only trip to a client site, I’ll carry a pistol for motel protection. I check my bag thoroughly before flying and have never had a problem other than a couple of forgotten pocket knives (the shame of it!). But I can see someone getting in a rush and forgetting to check. These people are not terrorists! Why is it that you hand-wringers simply want to criminalize everything you don’t like. People make mistakes; why give someone a criminal record (and many of you say put them in jail) for a mistake does occur.
I think the phrase is.. “Let he who is without sin……….”
vuduchld
December 5th, 2012
11:19 pm
One thing for sure, you Jawjians have become poster children for stupidity
noguns
December 5th, 2012
11:23 pm
the government needs to start banning a lot of these guns—too many people have guns and are causing all these shootings and crimes. The government needs to limit guns to only certain people and only small guns—I’m tired of all the guns in this country!
jim
December 6th, 2012
3:32 am
I think everybody should be able to carry a gun onboard, Do you think 911 would have happened if afew passengers had guns?
globeflyer
December 6th, 2012
8:07 am
No.
Alpha23
December 6th, 2012
9:06 am
After reading several of these remarks, I can see why the US is in the shape it is now! The liberal mind is not a ‘wondrous’ thing!
blkshepherd
December 6th, 2012
9:31 am
As the owner of a 38 special. The weapon never leaves my home. Is not laying around in the open (I live alone) There is NO WAY if I were to carry it with me anywhere and not Remember that I have it, No way. I am constantly conscience and aware I have it with me.
These people are idoits and should be fined so that in the future they will remember the huge hole left in their pocket from the fines, not to mention record that that they will receive, jail time, missing their flights, ruining their plans, I would say. They will never ever forget again. Fine them heavy
As I stated I own a gun and Never forget it is in my possesion, never, actually I stopped carring one because one was stolen out of my car when my keys were stollen and car went into and the only reason the car not stolen is because it had a anti theft lock inwhich if you dont know how to diactivate the system the car will not crank but that didnt stop the thief from stealing whatever was in the car, my gun included so.so much for leaving a weapon in your car, if the car is broken into, chances are they will find your weapon and it will be stolen so leaving guns in cars do not protect them and not the best idea.
But my thing is, you KNOW you are going to the airport, why on earth do you need to carry a gun? Did you NOT pack before you left the house? who packed your bags?
I do not buy the excuse I forgot it was in my bag, You have no business putting a loaded weapon in your bag when you know you are about to go to the Airport, court house, any place of high security. As one post said if you cant remember you have a loaded weapon on you, you should not be allowed to own one period because your mind is not all the way there.
will
December 6th, 2012
10:55 am
A citizen pays his taxes that support the security and justice systems to secure his safety and rights. He legally owns and carries a gun to further protect himself. It would be a very rare citizen who is unaware that a gun will easily be detected by an airport scanner. If for some reason that citizen intended to do harm on an airplane, would he knowingly put his gun in a bag and put it though security?
This law-abiding citizen, likely productive and busy, unknowingly puts his bag with gun on the conveyer belt. In a sane world, how would such a situation be resolved?
Currently, the citizen is handcuffed, humiliated, placed in a cage with career criminals for a period of time, and is penalized in the five figures with fines and legal fees.
What if this were to happen: the security authorities, paid for by this citizen, inform the citizen he seems to forgot he had a gun in his bag ( a gun the citizen has a legal right to own and carry), and suggest the citizen take the gun back to a secure place?
Anonymous
December 6th, 2012
1:02 pm
To EVERYONE in This Forum:
Listen…, I did NOT let My Emotions get in The Way when there was a Debate as to whether or not a Person should or should not have a Firearm at The Airport, or in Their Carry-on Bag.
I only Stated The Law as is found within The Official Code of Georgia Annotated.
Whether You like it or not…, Georgia is a Gun FREINDLY State, as Georgia ALLOWS: Open Carry or Concealed Carry, either Loaded or Unloaded, of: Handguns and Rifles and Shotguns and Knives, in any Location ANYWHERE in This State other than an Unauthorized Location. While Handguns and Knives with Blades Greater than 5 Inches in Length Require a Georgia Weapons Carry License while in Public, no License is needed for any other Firearm or Weapon.
Georgia ALLOWS Firearms at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, every other Airport in Georgia, and on MARTA Property and inside MARTA Rail-Cars and Buses, again…, whether You like it or not.
Georgia Preempts Firearm and Knive Regulation to The State, Similiar as to how 43 other States do, and The City of Atlanta or Clayton County is Powerless to Ban Firearms or Knives from The Airport.
Again…, like a said before, a Crime is ONLY Committed, if and only if, a Person takes a Weapon to that Portion of The Airport which is “Restricted” Pursuant to Federal Law. The Term “Restricted” only Includes The TSA Checkpoints and The Concourses.
The Law is The Law. Many Times I have had to Explain to others that Emotion Enforcement and Law Enforcement is Two Totally Different Issues. Police Officers, Prosecutors, and Judges CANNOT Allow Their Emotions on Guns to get in The Way of Their Official Duties, again…, whether They Agree on Gun Control or not.
I do not Deserve to be Labeled as: “[a Person who should be] Shot in The Face” Solely for Reiterating The Laws of The State of Georgia, but I should NOT Commit Acts of Name Calling either, so I Apologize to Whomever Meli is.
However, Georgia, like 43 other States, ALLOWS Firearms in Airports and on Airport Property!
Noflylist
December 6th, 2012
3:54 pm
The biggest sissies carry the biggest guns.
Andy
December 6th, 2012
3:55 pm
I wonder how many of you anti-gun zealots would have been thankful that there were no handguns or rifles on those planes that were rammed into the twin towers in 2001 if YOU were on them. Yep, by golly, we’re going to get smashed all over the ground and into a building, but at least those eeeeeevvvvvvvvillllllllll guns aren’t on the plane.
You people sicken me.
commoncents
December 6th, 2012
3:59 pm
blkshepherd-
Your post is nonsense
“As the owner of a 38 special. The weapon never leaves my home…There is NO WAY if I were to carry it with me anywhere and not Remember that I have it, No way. I am constantly conscience and aware I have it with me. ”
So does it leave your home or not? You stated both in your opening paragraph.
A. S. Mathew
December 9th, 2012
8:29 am
Now the Postal department employees ask the question whether the package has an liquid or flammable items. Likewise, the person all the way up in the front of the passenger’s line must ask the question, ” Do you carry any weapon”?. This is quite a joke, how some people forget to take the gun out of their carry on bags-they don’t come to the airport barefooted or straight from the bed.