<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health reform: Is Obama&#8217;s move to co-ops a good one?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/</link>
	<description>Get inside Atlanta\&#039;s and national business news and how it affects you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:32:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jwhenry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2578</link>
		<dc:creator>jwhenry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 05:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2578</guid>
		<description>Mr. President why are the banking,and loan company not making loans as you promised they would do for the american people we are all hurting and not getting any help. Time for them to answer to you for not helping us the little people that keep them in business, maybe we should boycott their business. Check http://www.obamamortgagerelief.org/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. President why are the banking,and loan company not making loans as you promised they would do for the american people we are all hurting and not getting any help. Time for them to answer to you for not helping us the little people that keep them in business, maybe we should boycott their business. Check <a href="http://www.obamamortgagerelief.org/." rel="nofollow">http://www.obamamortgagerelief.org/.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fekenney</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>Fekenney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>Government should stay out of Health care insurance. The function of government would be limited to the writing of one Basic Health Care Policy and the private insurance companies would be required to bid on the One Plan.(Level Playing Field). One plan one form. Why do they make it so complicated. With the insurance companies bidding one the same plan the confusion stops and all the  goals that Obama wishes would be met. The cost for employers would be implemented over a five year period allowing everyone to gear up. This could be 10% employer and 90 % employee for the first year 20%/80% the second and in five years 50/50.  Some businesses are 90 % material and 10 % labor and others are 90 % labor and 10 % material. Our country is the last remaining country to not cap the profits of Health Insurance Companies. Switzerland capped the profits several years ago to keep the insurance companies in line. 

Government should monitor Health Care, Utilities, Financial Institutions, National Transportation and Communications and stay out of our lives. A similar approach could apply to all of the above categories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Government should stay out of Health care insurance. The function of government would be limited to the writing of one Basic Health Care Policy and the private insurance companies would be required to bid on the One Plan.(Level Playing Field). One plan one form. Why do they make it so complicated. With the insurance companies bidding one the same plan the confusion stops and all the  goals that Obama wishes would be met. The cost for employers would be implemented over a five year period allowing everyone to gear up. This could be 10% employer and 90 % employee for the first year 20%/80% the second and in five years 50/50.  Some businesses are 90 % material and 10 % labor and others are 90 % labor and 10 % material. Our country is the last remaining country to not cap the profits of Health Insurance Companies. Switzerland capped the profits several years ago to keep the insurance companies in line. </p>
<p>Government should monitor Health Care, Utilities, Financial Institutions, National Transportation and Communications and stay out of our lives. A similar approach could apply to all of the above categories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Engdahl-Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Engdahl-Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2238</guid>
		<description>Rules Matter!

So much depends on the rules established to govern a co-op and how they compare to the rules governing other members of the healthcare system. More at http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=1288#more-1288</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rules Matter!</p>
<p>So much depends on the rules established to govern a co-op and how they compare to the rules governing other members of the healthcare system. More at <a href="http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=1288#more-1288" rel="nofollow">http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=1288#more-1288</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mld</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>mld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>We need tax policies that preserve America’s global competitiveness, and we need to oppose policies that reduce businesses’ ability to grow.  Make the tax system simple and fair.  A successful economy encourages investment and rewards achievement.  It would be the height of economic folly to target any group for a major tax increase. http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/takeaction/index.cfm?ID=42</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need tax policies that preserve America’s global competitiveness, and we need to oppose policies that reduce businesses’ ability to grow.  Make the tax system simple and fair.  A successful economy encourages investment and rewards achievement.  It would be the height of economic folly to target any group for a major tax increase. <a href="http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/takeaction/index.cfm?ID=42" rel="nofollow">http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/takeaction/index.cfm?ID=42</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>goldie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>I have been fortunate enough to have quality health care all of my life.  Today, my family has the best health care that money can buy, but I care about those in this country who are not as fortunate.  I believe that everyone should have access to quality health care.

In our current system, the taxpayers and the insured (people like myself) are paying the cost for those who are less fortunate at an astronomical cost.  The high costs for health care are partly due to the overuse of emergency rooms/hospitals by the unisured.  It would seem to me that a program that provides more access to health care for the poor and uninsured would both provide people with what should be a basic right, as well as reduce the costs associated with overuse, which the current taxpayer and insured are paying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been fortunate enough to have quality health care all of my life.  Today, my family has the best health care that money can buy, but I care about those in this country who are not as fortunate.  I believe that everyone should have access to quality health care.</p>
<p>In our current system, the taxpayers and the insured (people like myself) are paying the cost for those who are less fortunate at an astronomical cost.  The high costs for health care are partly due to the overuse of emergency rooms/hospitals by the unisured.  It would seem to me that a program that provides more access to health care for the poor and uninsured would both provide people with what should be a basic right, as well as reduce the costs associated with overuse, which the current taxpayer and insured are paying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlotte</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2183</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlotte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2183</guid>
		<description>Health care cost began to rapidly expand when we allowed health insurance and hospitals to become &#039;for profit&quot; with stock holders who expected to earn money off the health of other people.  Of course the more things that are denined, the more the stockholders earn.  If we don&#039;t have a gov&#039;t plan, we must do more to regulate health insurance.  Yes, I would trust the gov&#039;t with my health care needs any day over a large corporation designed to make a profit.  The gov&#039;t regulates the plans available to federal employees and we have excellent care.  We have no power as individuals over the large corporations, but we do as a public have tremendous over our elected officials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Health care cost began to rapidly expand when we allowed health insurance and hospitals to become &#8216;for profit&#8221; with stock holders who expected to earn money off the health of other people.  Of course the more things that are denined, the more the stockholders earn.  If we don&#8217;t have a gov&#8217;t plan, we must do more to regulate health insurance.  Yes, I would trust the gov&#8217;t with my health care needs any day over a large corporation designed to make a profit.  The gov&#8217;t regulates the plans available to federal employees and we have excellent care.  We have no power as individuals over the large corporations, but we do as a public have tremendous over our elected officials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorenzo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2181</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorenzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2181</guid>
		<description>Here are two questions to consider for health insurance consumers.
When your doctor recommends a treatment for you:
Which is worse, having a government bureacrat decide whether you may have the  treatment or having an insurance company bureaucrat decide whether you may have the treatment?
Which of the two bureaucrats has an incentive to refuse your treatment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are two questions to consider for health insurance consumers.<br />
When your doctor recommends a treatment for you:<br />
Which is worse, having a government bureacrat decide whether you may have the  treatment or having an insurance company bureaucrat decide whether you may have the treatment?<br />
Which of the two bureaucrats has an incentive to refuse your treatment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LMR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2180</link>
		<dc:creator>LMR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2180</guid>
		<description>First of all, the government should NOT in any way shape or form be involved, even remotely, in healthcare.  There has never been a government program that has been successful.  Perhaps the initial intent is good but NO program ever has been successful and NO program ever has ever remained within the projected dollar cost of the program.  The programs are always 10&#039;s of millions of dollars more.  AND no government program, once instated, is EVER gotten rid of.  

So I&#039;m done, completely finished.  I don&#039;t want government in any more parts of our lives.  Stick within the Constitution of protecting and defending us and leave us alone to pursue life, liberty and happiness. 

With the socalled coop option, there is still an initial government funded seed to the program.   And guess who is footing that bill...those of us who are working and/or have worked all of our lives.  I say let insurance companies compete...competition has always driven costs down and has spurred on innovation to create better products more efficiently.  So, too, would the health care industry as well as the health care research industry.   

Also, health insurance was originally NOT  intended for every little sniffle at the doctors office.  It was meant to be there precisely FOR catastrophic illness or accident, NOT for every day issues.  Look at auto insurance...you are NOT insured for oil changes and tire changes...you are insured for accidents etc.  If this were the case regarding our physical health, everyone would realize what the real cost of insurance was, because they&#039;d be paying for every doctor&#039;s  visit and every ER visit.  And if we did that, then to carry insurance for the catastrophic instances and long term maladies, would be affordable.  And we&#039;d have MORE money in our pockets to pay for the every year doctor&#039;s visits!

 I say NO, to government programs.  Stick to protecting our borders, keep us safe from terrorism.   Healthcare is the last issue we need to be involved with now with what is going on in the world around us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, the government should NOT in any way shape or form be involved, even remotely, in healthcare.  There has never been a government program that has been successful.  Perhaps the initial intent is good but NO program ever has been successful and NO program ever has ever remained within the projected dollar cost of the program.  The programs are always 10&#8217;s of millions of dollars more.  AND no government program, once instated, is EVER gotten rid of.  </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m done, completely finished.  I don&#8217;t want government in any more parts of our lives.  Stick within the Constitution of protecting and defending us and leave us alone to pursue life, liberty and happiness. </p>
<p>With the socalled coop option, there is still an initial government funded seed to the program.   And guess who is footing that bill&#8230;those of us who are working and/or have worked all of our lives.  I say let insurance companies compete&#8230;competition has always driven costs down and has spurred on innovation to create better products more efficiently.  So, too, would the health care industry as well as the health care research industry.   </p>
<p>Also, health insurance was originally NOT  intended for every little sniffle at the doctors office.  It was meant to be there precisely FOR catastrophic illness or accident, NOT for every day issues.  Look at auto insurance&#8230;you are NOT insured for oil changes and tire changes&#8230;you are insured for accidents etc.  If this were the case regarding our physical health, everyone would realize what the real cost of insurance was, because they&#8217;d be paying for every doctor&#8217;s  visit and every ER visit.  And if we did that, then to carry insurance for the catastrophic instances and long term maladies, would be affordable.  And we&#8217;d have MORE money in our pockets to pay for the every year doctor&#8217;s visits!</p>
<p> I say NO, to government programs.  Stick to protecting our borders, keep us safe from terrorism.   Healthcare is the last issue we need to be involved with now with what is going on in the world around us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Beale</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Beale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2179</guid>
		<description>If as GB says a public option won&#039;t contain insurance companies which are &quot;already heavily regulated by state governments,&quot; then that is the best argument I&#039;ve heard yet for scrapping the entire insurance-based system completely and going with single-payer. 30-cents out of every healthcare dollar spent goes to insurance companies. As long as profit is their motive, then healthcare will be rationed by insurance company bureaucrats, 50 million people will be left without any healthcare at all, and we all will continue to pay for a broken system while insurance company fat cats continue to profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If as GB says a public option won&#8217;t contain insurance companies which are &#8220;already heavily regulated by state governments,&#8221; then that is the best argument I&#8217;ve heard yet for scrapping the entire insurance-based system completely and going with single-payer. 30-cents out of every healthcare dollar spent goes to insurance companies. As long as profit is their motive, then healthcare will be rationed by insurance company bureaucrats, 50 million people will be left without any healthcare at all, and we all will continue to pay for a broken system while insurance company fat cats continue to profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhea Harper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/2009/08/17/health-reform-is-obamas-move-to-co-ops-a-good-one/comment-page-1/#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhea Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/business-beat/?p=1520#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>WARNING ... read between the lines in the script that is put before Obama in his speaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WARNING &#8230; read between the lines in the script that is put before Obama in his speaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
