Just last week, a strong majority on the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a 1999 federal law outlawing certain videos depicting animal cruelty and other weird practices involving animals (so-called “crush videos”) was overly broad and operated as an unconstitutional infringement of First Amendment rights. I was one of the few members of the U.S. House of Representatives to vote against the legislation at the time of its passage. I did so for the same reasons the Supreme Court threw out the statute last week — not because any of us find the activity protected by the First Amendment to be laudable (far from it); but because it sweeps too broadly and attaches criminal penalties to a person’s right to freedom of expression.
Moreover, it is not as if true acts of animal cruelty would go unpunished without this federal law in place; virtually every state already criminalizes such practices. The high Court decision, and my vote against the legislation 11 years ago, simply reflect
Continue reading Violent video games in Supreme Court crosshairs? »