CHRIS SAYS: I wouldn’t call myself Canadian either, eh? To say you love everything about a country or even a person ALL THE TIME without any misgivings or reservations whatsoever is naive idealism. I have been called idealistic many times but rarely naive.

Stumpy July 30th, 2009 12:14 am SAID: However, you are the first Liberal I’ve seen (in a long time) that could actually admit when they were wrong about something. I’m intrigued. It means you’re a thinking human and there’s a chance for dialog. I have had to admit I was wrong on ‘Huffington Post’, and believe me, I got roasted severely. Perhaps we can have lively, actual debates and not just rhetoric spewing. I look forward to it.

CHRIS SAYS: Actually, this may surprise you but I consider myself an independent. Many left wing talk radio and news shows turn me off as much as the ones from the right. I rarely find myself watching MSNBC, CNN or FOX because I find them pandering to an ignorant and uninformed audience. I voted for Bush Sr. in 92 (always liked Papa Bush), for Clinton in 96(other choice was pathetic Dole), for Bush in 2000 (couldn’t stand Gore), for Kerry in 04(would have voted for the dog catcher if he/she ran against Bush at this point) and Obama in 08(Sarah Palin omfg/what was McCain thinking?). As you can see, not the typical liberal voting record. I may have voted for Obama but I also disagree with a lot of his decisions.

Sorry for the let down but not what you were expecting, eh?

Chris, are you only proud of your country when you like the President? I have never called myself Canadian because I was ashamed of what I dislike about my country. I do like Canada though, great beer. But, even when Clinton was our President and I was ashamed of him, I was still proud to be American.

However, you are the first Liberal I’ve seen (in a long time) that could actually admit when they were wrong about something. I’m intrigued. It means you’re a thinking human and there’s a chance for dialog. I have had to admit I was wrong on ‘Huffington Post’, and believe me, I got roasted severely. Perhaps we can have lively, actual debates and not just rhetoric spewing. I look forward to it.

CHRIS SAYS: You obviously aren’t that smart if you’re comparing yourself to Sarah Palin. Now even I wouldn’t stoop THAT LOW!!! LOL, If only all of us could be enlightened enough to aspire to her great intellect!!! Called you a Redneck??? LOL, I called you a racist, dude!!! Funny that you consider “redneck” a worse insult. Tells me how that little mind of your works. You pretty much called Professor Gates the “N” word so calling me that wouldn’t be a stretch……though it would leave people confused since I’m of good German stock. But go ahead, as Clint Eastwood said” Make my day”!!!!

WBK July 29th, 2009 2:00 pm SAID:I am talking about a racist Professor who will not be admonished for his behavior OUTSIDE his home. You do not have private property rights anymore because you liberals have already taken that away. The 4th ammendment does NOT apply. The professor (if you want to call someone like that a professor) should have had a little more self discipline.

CHRIS SAID: For behavior OUTSIDE his home? You mean on his PROPERTY outside his RESIDENCE? Don’t know which state you live in but we STILL HAVE private property rights. LOL, the Professor should have had more self-discipline? On his own property? ROFLMAO. Hey guys, no more wearing tacky shirts or wife beaters on your OWN PROPERTY!!! Ever heard the saying about your home being your castle? But then you will realize that once you move out of your Mom’s house.

WBK July 29th, 2009 2:00 pm SAID:The “officer of the law” was sent there for a legal purpose. Oh well, it does not matter. Who cares.

CHRIS SAYS: Yeah, the cop was sent for a legal purpose and once he identified the legal resident, he should have backed off. Now, hopefully, the Professor sues the local cops and lets the courts sort it out the LEGAL way.

CHRIS SAYS” Not ashamed anymore. Rather proud of the fact now. But then if I left, who would show the mentally challenged here how the better half think?