Comments on: Of Guns, Private Property and Judge Sotomayor http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/ Where experience, logic and ideas trump political correctness and the status quo every time Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:28:31 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Rob http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-3643 Rob Tue, 04 Aug 2009 08:35:47 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-3643 AS a strict non-believer in the supreme courts 's ability to understand what most third year law students are taught; I don't think J. sotomayor, the "liberal sweetheart" has or should have any place on the bench. It seems obvious to most law scholars, esp.. those of us earning our PHDs, that the local police are NO substitute for a well armed militia, as is prescribed in the constitution. Since Sotomyaor doesn't hold this view anyone who believes in freedom and the constitution, as it is written, cannot in good conscience endorse Judge Sotoamyor. R. Benson C of 2010 AS a strict non-believer in the supreme courts ’s ability to understand what most third year law students are taught; I don’t think J. sotomayor, the “liberal sweetheart” has or should have any place on the bench. It seems obvious to most law scholars, esp.. those of us earning our PHDs, that the local police are NO substitute for a well armed militia, as is prescribed in the constitution. Since Sotomyaor doesn’t hold this view anyone who believes in freedom and the constitution, as it is written, cannot in good conscience endorse Judge Sotoamyor.

R. Benson C of 2010

]]> By: cr747 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-2833 cr747 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:51:25 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-2833 What I am saying is, we don't need someone of this caliber to be trusted to sit on the bench of the supreme court of the United States of America. She won't answer half of the questions that have been presented to her,so I'm saying she can't be trusted. So VK there are no fumes to smell (or suck as you say) and for sure no koolaid to drink from my standpoint. It's funny to me congress changes the laws of the United States as they wish, and I say that half of the ones that have been in office for so long, are there for themselves and themselves only. They need to be voted out and replaced with someone that are for the people and not for themselves. ' What I am saying is, we don’t need someone of this caliber to be trusted to sit on the bench of the supreme court of the United States of America. She won’t answer half of the questions that have been presented to her,so I’m saying she can’t be trusted. So VK there are no fumes to smell (or suck as you say) and for sure no koolaid to drink from my standpoint. It’s funny to me congress changes the laws of the United States as they wish, and I say that half of the ones that have been in office for so long, are there for themselves and themselves only. They need to be voted out and replaced with someone that are for the people and not for themselves.
‘

]]> By: VK http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-2832 VK Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:59:57 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-2832 Bob...right. Home invasion defense are the only time guns are used. Guns are never used in crimes on the street, or children accidently shooting themselves or others or in thousands of other gun deaths. And those home invasion situations involve the need for cop-killer bullets and AK47s. Maybe we should give each home owner a small nuclear warhead. That will stop break ins. No point having real background checks or a 5 day wait period. No point in requiring gun shows to abide by the restrictions. 747, are you sucking the fumes? You want her to change the law now? Roe v Wade is established law. Murdering babies? No need to do that. Just let them be born and then you gun nuts claim a right to shoot and kill. Drink some more of the koolaid. Bob…right. Home invasion defense are the only time guns are used. Guns are never used in crimes on the street, or children accidently shooting themselves or others or in thousands of other gun deaths. And those home invasion situations involve the need for cop-killer bullets and AK47s. Maybe we should give each home owner a small nuclear warhead. That will stop break ins. No point having real background checks or a 5 day wait period. No point in requiring gun shows to abide by the restrictions.

747, are you sucking the fumes? You want her to change the law now? Roe v Wade is established law. Murdering babies? No need to do that. Just let them be born and then you gun nuts claim a right to shoot and kill. Drink some more of the koolaid.

]]> By: retiredds http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-2831 retiredds Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:43:47 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-2831 I see where the NRA opposes Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court. In my book that affirms my belief she is a very qualified candidate and should be confirmed. I see where the NRA opposes Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court. In my book that affirms my belief she is a very qualified candidate and should be confirmed.

]]> By: retiredds http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-2830 retiredds Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:20:33 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-2830 Now that the Sotomayor hearings are almost done, guess what!! All the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee will vote her down and all the Democrats will vote for her confirmation. Not much new here. Now that the Sotomayor hearings are almost done, guess what!! All the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee will vote her down and all the Democrats will vote for her confirmation. Not much new here.

]]> By: Disgusted http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-2828 Disgusted Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:25:41 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-2828 Anybody got a wheelbarrow to sell so that I can take my guns to town with me? :roll: Anybody got a wheelbarrow to sell so that I can take my guns to town with me? :roll:

]]> By: retiredds http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-2827 retiredds Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:57:26 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-2827 I always enjoy the Supreme Court Senate Judiciary hearings because the adversaries (this time the Republicans) always try to nail down the nominee to specifics and the nominee (whether a Democratic or Republican) will remain vague. What always comes out is that the nominee, in most cases, has more knowledge about the law, and its nuances, and the Constitution than the Senate Committee questioners. Unless Sotomayor really screws up she will be confirmed, as Senator Lindsey Graham noted early on. Thus far, she, like Roberts and Alito before her, is showing that she is "fully qualified" to sit on the SC. I always enjoy the Supreme Court Senate Judiciary hearings because the adversaries (this time the Republicans) always try to nail down the nominee to specifics and the nominee (whether a Democratic or Republican) will remain vague. What always comes out is that the nominee, in most cases, has more knowledge about the law, and its nuances, and the Constitution than the Senate Committee questioners. Unless Sotomayor really screws up she will be confirmed, as Senator Lindsey Graham noted early on. Thus far, she, like Roberts and Alito before her, is showing that she is “fully qualified” to sit on the SC.

]]> By: 1984 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-2826 1984 Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:11:18 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-2826 As a wise white man, I would hope that my experience as a white man would help me see things differently than some hag latina woman. See JF McNamara, THAT statement is racist. It's exactly what she said. As a wise white man, I would hope that my experience as a white man would help me see things differently than some hag latina woman.

See JF McNamara, THAT statement is racist. It’s exactly what she said.

]]> By: 1984 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-2825 1984 Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:03:46 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-2825 JF McNamara, you totally missed my point but nice try in trying to call me a racist you jerk. If you had read what I actually wrote instead of cheery picking certain words you'd know that I was turning it around on libs like Dowd and Sotamayor for being and saying racist things. Jerk. JF McNamara, you totally missed my point but nice try in trying to call me a racist you jerk. If you had read what I actually wrote instead of cheery picking certain words you’d know that I was turning it around on libs like Dowd and Sotamayor for being and saying racist things. Jerk.

]]> By: JF McNamara http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/2009/07/15/of-guns-private-property-and-judge-sotomayor/comment-page-1/#comment-2824 JF McNamara Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:57:33 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/bob-barr-blog/?p=397#comment-2824 I don't think anyone wants to argue those points with you 1984 because its clear that you are racist who just wants some attention. Why bother? If you want to believe the world is nothing but stereotypes, then discussing those topics with you is a just waste of time. I don’t think anyone wants to argue those points with you 1984 because its clear that you are racist who just wants some attention. Why bother? If you want to believe the world is nothing but stereotypes, then discussing those topics with you is a just waste of time.

]]>