May the angels receive your spirit, Jack; you were a GOOD man!!

Also, call it “old” and “undefined”, but conservatism doesn’t change. Conservative ideals are just that: Conservative. These ideals were never closer to perfection than when the Constitution of the United States was signed. Would you like to know why? Those men had a profound belief in God, and their principles were rooted in the Bible. What they created was VERY good, drew upon previous experience (freedom to worship GOD, whom they considered to be the god found in the King James Bible, in a person’s own way was the very reason the men who shaped America up until it’s independence came to America; they realized the failures of the European monarchies), and casted a wary eye towards the future (Why do you think they made it a point to write that a set of rights (religiously- inspired, might I add) was not to be infringed upon.

I don’t understand how people continue to cite the “failures” of true conservatism. Where has it failed when put into action properly, and when it was TRUE conservatism? I won’t spout off and say that the Republicans support TRUE conservatism. They don’t. And do not make it seem as if we need to become less “conservative”. Do not bring up Reagan in the light of being too conservative. Reagan was VERY good. But guess what? He wasn’t as conservative as he could have, and should have been. That’s right, I want “Ultra”- conservatism. Don’t “Republicans” realize being un- politically “correct” will put them back in the driver’s seat? “Oh, we shouldn’t be as hard- hearted as Reagan, we should listen to the other side more, we should be tolerant of different beliefs”. What?! That isn’t conservatism and it won’t work. Conservatism is a back- bone you either stick with, or you don’t. It works best when fully intact. People want to hear that when they work hard, they will get just due. People want to hear that people who don’t make efforts to better themselves won’t be seeing the aforementioned people’s tax money. I know I want to hear it. That’s why I like people like Alan Keyes, Ron Paul, Bob Barr, and the like.

I find it funny how this new- age (Last forty- fifty years, a “healthy” dose with FDR early in the twentieth century) “tolerance” psycho- babble encourages the acceptance of many things traditionally seen as wrong, yet bashes the people who continue to look at ideas through Biblical perspective. I think I will just stick with my “frigid”, “out- dated” Bible teachings. That way I will have the satisfaction, that at least I, will be a moral- driven person.

Alright, I’m done bitching, but don’t give me any of that nonsense about Libertarians not having a philosophy. Just think a little bit. Did Hitler have a clear philosophy? Yes. Was it right? In my opinion, no. I am in no means implying that Libertarians are evil, I’m just making the point that EVERYBODY and every belief has a philosophy. And don’t say that Libertarians don’t have a clear philosophy. They straight- up tell you what they have done, what they want to do, and what they plan to do if given power MUCH BETTER than either the “Republican” party or the Democrat Party.

Obama official Kareem Dale confirms White House’s love for MSNBC

For some inexplicable reason having to do with who knows what, a widespread impression has grown among many politics fans that MSNBC and its crowd of talkers — including Chris “Thrill Up My Leg” Matthews, Norah “The GOP Is Doomed to Die” O’Donnell and Ed “It’s Time to Grind Them Into the Ground” Schultz — are somewhat in favor of President Obama.

Well, actually in complete love with the Great Change Agent.

Now, thanks to the ubiquitous cameras of C-SPAN, comes official videoed word from Kareem Dale, special assistant to the president for arts and culture and a key White House advisor on disability policy.

At the 1:51 mark of this video, Dale candidly reveals the new administration’s reciprocal feelings. Hint: Apparently the new White House has a popular internal saying involving the words “love” and “MSNBC.”

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2009/05/white-house-msnbc.html

Unlike some people (like, say, one former US Representative that was a leader of the partisan and priggish impeachment of Clinton for having consensual sex, and also sponsored the homophobic Defense of Marriage Act), Kemp was totally true to improving America’s economic opportunities.

He made no appeals to the mean and the stupid, so very un-Republican.

Jack Kemp was a decent man, an optimist about people. So rare in our country, doubly especially from the right…

Jklol