Secession talk far from extreme

Although he later downplayed his remark, Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s use of the “S” word — secession — during one of the April 15 tea parties has focused attention on the growing gulf between the dramatic, unprecedented growth in the federal government’s power and spending, and efforts by individual states to maintain independent authority.
Any reference, however vague, to the notion that one of the 50 states might actually consider cutting the ties between it and Washington evokes howls of derision from the political establishment.

But the growing grass-roots sentiment that dramatic action is necessary to restore a semblance of balanced federalism in the country makes it likely such discussion will increase.

The fact that Perry also noted that some military veterans in the crowd at Austin might be “right-wing extremists” also reflected the growing chasm between government and citizens opposed to runaway federal spending and power.

The governor’s reference, echoed in other tea parties last week, was based on the fact that federal and state government law enforcement Web sites and publications characterize grass-roots organizations concerned about gun control, nationalization, unemployment, loss of civil liberties and excessive government spending, as “right-wing extremists” and “militants.”

That people would be viewed by our government as a possible threat because they express concern for the loss of freedom and our growing economic problems is itself so bizarre that references to secession are unsurprising.

Placing Perry’s remarks in the context of his position the previous day in support of a Texas state House resolution reaffirming support for the 10th Amendment strengthens the reasonableness of his position. On April 14, Perry expressed his “unwavering support for efforts all across our country to reaffirm the states’ rights affirmed by the 10th Amendment.”

He also noted that he and “millions of Texans are tired of Washington, D.C., trying to come down here and tell us how to run Texas.” Are such views “extreme”? Do they not, rather, reflect mainstream and historically accurate sentiments? After all, is not the resolution Perry supported simply a reaffirmation of the very words of and the philosophy underlying the 10th Amendment?

Much of the media, in addition to characterizing Perry’s comments as “reckless” (the words of one Texas newspaper), also have attempted to paint such views as economically irresponsible. This view is premised on the “loss” of federal funds that would befall Texas or any other state that might sever ties to Washington. In fact, many of the 50 states send more in tax dollars to Washington than the states and its citizens receive from the feds — making secession actually not that bad a business deal (Texas about breaks even).

In fact, the sky likely would not fall if some serious moves were made to break the stranglehold the federal government now maintains on virtually every aspect of state and local governments. There are, in fact, some examples starting to surface. The RealID program, with its mandate of a national identification card, has been brought largely to a standstill because of state opposition.

And at least a few states — Texas and South Carolina among them — are refusing President Barack Obama’s “stimulus monies” because of the strings attached.
Who knows? If Texas were to secede, the state might enjoy a significant inward migration of independent-minded citizens from other states, and precipitate a real boom in its economy.

Regardless, simply musing about such things, as did the Texas governor, is neither subversive nor pointless.

120 comments Add your comment

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
12:24 pm

Happy Earth Day everyone!

For Earth Day I am driving my gas guzzler AND have the air conditioner on at full blast. I cut down some unwanted trees in the back yard and I am also keeping all my lights on in the house.

Real Patriot

April 22nd, 2009
12:25 pm


Sorry, I can see you are an ararchist. When I was serving with the Marines in IRaq I always wondered why folks like you were not in the line next to me


April 22nd, 2009
12:27 pm

So much here about the legality or not of secession. There are compelling arguments on both sides concerning the legality of it. Just keep in mind this – no Confederate leaders were ever brought up on charges of treason. It would have forced the Supreme Court to decide the Constitutionality of the notion of secession. Officially there is nothing in the Constitution forbidding a state from seceding, but nor is there any sort of condoning of the activity. It was a hot button at the time the Constitution was drafted, with the failure of the first government under the Articles of Confederation some states wanted to ensure that there was still a back door. So it remains to this day a fuzzy issue – and personally one I don’t think will be SERIOUSLY revisited. Gov. Perry was making a point, that the Constitution envisioned a stronger role for state and local governments and a federal government that was kept in check. Unfortunately, this is where the failure is – on both sides.

As for those who suggest that Texas is a state full of racists – have you even visited there? They are no more anti-black than here in Georgia or even New York. Southerners are known more for speaking their mind, and I have seen and heard horrible things from Northerners that would make most “rednecks” look tame. Texas has a significant Hispanic population, and the people in general are very accepting, so long as you don’t go in assuming they are just stupid hicks. That they don’t like.

Meanwhile, I encourage everyone in Georgia to look carefully at our upcoming Governor’s race. I am sick of good ol’ boy politics, and glad Sonny cannot run again. But even scarier is that now it is assumed that Roy Barnes, former governor, is now the Democratic frontrunner. This man who does not even have the brains to avoid alienating one of his largest support bases (teachers) in his reelection campaign, why would we ever want him governor again? Please no! But who to vote for from GOP? Handel, Oxendine, that Cobb county guy? No thanks. I liked Cagle, but he has dropped out for health reasons. No, this time I am going to vote Libertarian again – and we have a candidate! His name is John Monds, a Morehouse graduate who garnered over one million votes in a race against an incumbent GOP Public Service Commissioner, becoming the first Libertarian in the country to accomplish that feat! Look him up at

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
12:30 pm

Real Patriot, keep name calling pal. You look more and more idiotic with every insult.

Bush did not violate law because A: we were at war with an enemy that is not under the Geneva Convention.

B: waterboarding is not torture. No one gets hurt and no one dies. And, it saved lives.

Clinton lied and was disbarred.

If you want Bush tried at the Hague you are in the minority. Why? Because even President Hussein will not try ANY of the Bush officials. Why, because no laws were broken.

Again, when we are attacked again the democrat party is finished.

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
12:31 pm

Real Patriot, what is an ararchist? Never heard of that before but wait! I see that not only are you unintelligent, you can not spell as well! Awwwwwwwwwwwe, poor Real Patriot.

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
12:33 pm

Real Patriot, also, your training as a “soldier,” if that was what you really were, I mean there are jobs in the military as cooks and janitors, did not teach you common sense or intelligence. You don’t know anything about me pal. But then again, people like you think that burning the American flag is cool.

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
12:33 pm

Real Patriot, I might also add, you picked this fight.


April 22nd, 2009
12:37 pm

When I read the hate speech directed at Texans who actually value liberty and independence, I’m actually shocked. What ever happened to the idea of dissent being the highest form of patriotism? Frankly, some of the critics of Gov. Perry and patriotic Texans in general sound like a bunch of fascist warmongers ready to wage total war on any political minority that would dare stand up to the leviathan in Washington, D.C.

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
12:38 pm

The new Homeland Security woman may be the most inexperienced person, besides Obama, in charge of running the country.

Border comments spark diplomatic kerfuffle

Ottawa was rushing to defend its border security on Tuesday amid a diplomatic scuffle with the U.S., which erupted after Washington’s homeland security chief suggested that the 9-11 terrorists entered the U.S. through Canada.

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano made the comments during a media interview earlier this week, much to the chagrin of Canadians on both sides of the border.

In recent years, Ottawa has invested a great deal of effort into dispelling perceptions among Americans that Canada’s border is an easy entry point for terrorists planning attacks on U.S. soil.

“Unfortunately, misconceptions arise on something as fundamental as where the 9-11 terrorists came from,” said Michael Wilson, Canada’s ambassador in Washington.

Real Patriot

April 22nd, 2009
12:38 pm

sorry about the typo. i am still learning to the the prosthetic hand. Typical of you rear echelon types. In the rear with the gear and worrying about who typed what. Did you ever want to be a soldier and stand up for something?

anarchist – 1. a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism.
2. a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.
3. a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom.

Real Patriot

April 22nd, 2009
12:40 pm

Hey demo

Lets get together and talk about burning the flag. Im in Fayetteville. I’d be happy to meet you

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
12:42 pm

Real Patriot, again, you assume and make terrible judgments. You don’t know me and you don’t know what my beliefs and political leanings are. I have no idea if what you say is truth as many bloggers lie about who they really are. My entire family served in the military. Get my drift Real Patriot?

Instead of calling me names and assuming what I am as a person maybe you should step back and have a civil debate with me.

I am a capitalist pal. Not an anarchist. I believe in the rule of law and not the rule of chaos.

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
12:43 pm

Real Patriot, why would I want to meet someone who calls me names? I have no desire to meet anyone who insults me.


April 22nd, 2009
12:47 pm

Carlinism 101

our nation was founded when a group of white, salve-owning businessmen “seceded” from their mother country. in short, they benefited from the British Monarchy until they realized the true nature of the relationship (their wealth being siphoned in the form of taxes). so students, what have We the People learned from this glorious experiment in Constitutional government? we have learned that governments exist to serve those with property (wealth). at some point, the government bites back and seeks to serve its own needs (taxation, nationalization). in essence, the government become a business (provider of goods and services, at a cost). the only (semantic) difference is; the government “sells” Homeland Security, healthcare, home-ownership, etc. as I posted last week, all this talk of “tea parties” (and secession) is silly unless We the People (or the People of Texas and Alaska) are willing to stage their own follow-up “Bunker Hill” parties. And for those of you who were too busy worrying about your mortgage or your 401K in 2008, hurry up an Google Posse Comitatus and go to Wikipedia: “On October 1, 2008, the US Army announced that the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team (BCT) will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command (NORTHCOM), as an on-call federal response force for natural or man-made emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks. This marks the first time an active U.S. Army unit will be given a dedicated assignment to NORTHCOM, where it is stated they may be “called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios…” I am not some right-wing fringe nut job, but I think Uncle Sam just called “check mate”. This force is scheduled to be operation by 2011, and frankly, does anyone (besides the Federal Government) trust anyone IN the Federal Government to define “civil unrest” or “major public emergency”? If so, now GOOGLE “Kent State” and see what’s in store for you.

But not to worry, if you work hard (and it doesn’t hurt to be too big to fail) and attain a slot in the ownership class or the politician class, you have nothing to worry about because those 20,000 Federal troops work for you. If you are not in ownership/political class, you do not really have a stake in the game. you are a source of revenue for the real owners of this country. what did Gordon Gecco (Wall Street) say; “…I’m not talking about some schmuck making $250,000 a year and flying first class…” oh, and think about it, for all the talk of “all men beining endowed by their Creator, and the Bill of Rights, etc., the Consitution had to be amended to end slavery and afford women the right to vote (75 years and just over 100 years after the fact). if you own property (wealth) you have access to policians, who then draft legislation which serves your specific interests. if you do not have wealth your consolation prize is the Bill of Rights and the right to vote (let me know how that worked out the next time you drive through a DUI roadblock, get busted for smoking a joint, or heaven forbid, you are a homosexual who wants to marry your partner). the Federal Government has become its own entity (as opposed to the glue that holds the various states together). Texas and Alaska can no more secede than your or I can refuse to feed the beast every April 15th. whether it is the City of Atlanta (failed 911 experiment, useless public safety enterprise, etc.) the State of GA ($2 billion deficit) or the pimps in Congress, we are all being exploited for the benefit of a few. That’s not some “socialist rant” it’s what George Carlin called “The American Dream” because “you have to be asleep” to experience it.


April 22nd, 2009
12:51 pm

Oh dear God. The level of stupid here is reaching an all time high. Going green and not needing oil from Texas? Hold on while I roll around laughing at you’re complete stupidity. The very keyboard you type on has oil in it. The chair you sit in has oil in it. The monitor you stare at has oil in it. EVERYTHING you use has oil in it. Educate yourself then make an arguement. We will never see the day when oil is not used. Getting away from the middle east oil is the best thing we can do. WE need to strive for better energy sources but you people are just looney if you think we are walking away from oil. Lets attack them filthy rich people too while we are at it. I seen a new car yesterday that was all electric nice car with good stats. Problem is the sot was said to be 50K. Hmmm lets do the math on that. Can the so called middle and lower class afford a 50k vehicle? Answer: NO only the “filthy rich” can afford them so what we are really saying here is lets get rid of the rich so we dwell on the bottom because clearly none of you will ever work hard enough to actually be rich. Then the question is asked. How many of you have ever got a payroll check from a poor man? Good luck in your theories. When states like Texas do walk away and others follow and start to live in prosperity don’t come crying at our door. We’ve already see what you will do to a country and we don’t want it.


April 22nd, 2009
12:52 pm

I’m all for the secession movement…anything that makes the feds nervous is ok by me. Apparently I’m an extremist for no other reason than the fact that I love freedom over government.

Liberals and hard right-wingers just don’t get it…no liberty means no country. Remember McCains bumper-sticker campaign slogon, ‘Country First’? He got it wrong…it’s Liberty First. If your country fails you then why support it?


April 22nd, 2009
1:21 pm

Any wonder Congress is like it is, just look at the cooperation here.

Not completly worthless, could be used as a bad example.

Children who don’t get their way comes to mind.

Sore losers, with a chip on their shoulders.


April 22nd, 2009
1:42 pm

The USA as it was is probably over. There are huge differences in the cultures and beliefs of people from region to region, and these differences cannot and will not be overcome with the political extremes of the left and the right calling the shots. The Soviet Empire fell apart. It can happen here to if the extremes of the right and left do not come together and work out real solutions to our problems, instead of ignoring them until they are out of office,so they can blame the party that is in power.


April 22nd, 2009
1:58 pm

Go ahead all you Dimocrats, stick your head in the sand and drink your Obama Kool-Aid! Anyone with half a brain would realize the Obama Train with Nancy Pelosi (the trained seal), Harry Reid (the hemmorid on Nancy’s ass), Charlie Rangel (padding his money with taxpayer’s money) and a cast of other blind followers would realize it ain’t working and Obama has done more to weaken America since CNN bought his chair as president than we will ever dig out from under! Obama is not a leader… he is a puppet on a string or should I say teleprompter. Loose the teleprompter and he is a studdering/stammering idiot!



April 22nd, 2009
2:03 pm

Yawn. “Grass roots” my ass. This blog is absurd.

U Stink

April 22nd, 2009
2:52 pm



And by the way… It’s spelled “stuttering” NOT “studdering.”


April 22nd, 2009
3:08 pm

Californication: “I think Texas should use its power not to secede but to break up into 5 states”

One snag: they don’t have the power to do either one. Their admission treaty makes no mention of any “right to secede” (which the post-Civil War Supreme Court rulings trashed anyway), and their option of breaking into additional states consists of the right to APPROVE any such plan submitted by Congress.

By the way: Congrats to Governor Perry for breaking Governor Palin’s record for anti-American sentiment! She was just sleeping with a secessionist… Perry IS one! Can’t get much more America-hating than that!


April 22nd, 2009
3:18 pm

First off, Rick Perry is a Globalist shill who’s pressed hard for the NAFTA/NASCO/TTC Superhighway in Texas, and attended the Bilderberg conference in Istanbul. In my estimation, he’s a Neocon cut from the same mold as his pal “Jorge Boosh”, and his Texas sovereignty talk is just (empty) lip service to deceive Texans into thinking he’s a real conservative. I don’t trust Perry one iota!

That being said, if the Feds are not going to fully adhere to the Constitution (as required by law), then state(s) secession is indeed a valid option. In addition to movements in Texas & Alaska, the Free State Project is making wave in New Hampshire. Americans are fed up with the Globalist pawns in DC trampling on the Constitution.


April 22nd, 2009
3:26 pm

Whether it’s stuttering or studdering you got the point. The moron can’t talk without a teleprompter and someone telling him what to say or answer questions for him. I just thought Jimmy Carter was the worse president in American History until this moron got elected. And, as bad and nutless as Carter was…Obama is 10 times worse! I’m surprised Chavez, Castro and the Iranian Idiot don’t all move in with him at the White House and become one big happy family!

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
3:39 pm

More Democrat hypocrisy.

Pelosi knew NSA had listened to Harman phone calls

WASHINGTON (AP) – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Wednesday that she was aware a few years ago that Rep. Jane Harman had been overheard on a government wiretap.

“A few years ago, maybe three years ago, they did brief me,” Pelosi told reporters at an event hosted by the Christian Science Monitor.

She said that when a member of Congress is recorded as part of a wiretapped conversation, intelligence officials inform congressional leaders.

“That happened at that time,” Pelosi said. She added that the classified briefing was not detailed, and she did not tell Harman at the time.

“All I knew is that she was wiretapped,” Pelosi said.

“When you are briefed on something, it isn’t your information to share with anybody else,” she added. “Even if I wanted to share it with her, I would not have had the ability to share it with her.”

Harman has said she first learned of the wiretapping last week from a reporter who had knowledge of the transcript of the recording.

Congressional Quarterly reported Monday that Harman was overheard agreeing to seek lenient treatment for two former employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee who were under investigation and later indicted for unlawfully possessing and disclosing classified information.

In exchange, according to CQ, prominent pro-Israel contributors would press Pelosi to appoint Harman to the chairmanship of the House Intelligence Committee.

Harman has vehemently denied contacting the Justice Department or White House to intervene in the case and has asked Justice to release a transcript of the intercepted phone conversation.

Ron Roberts

April 22nd, 2009
3:40 pm

Hey ALPHA MALE – your post only points out the idiot that YOU are. The “state of New Hampshire” did not form a party, moron; folks LIVING in the state of New Hampshire might have, but not the STATE, itself; nor did its leading governing body or executive “espouse” secession. Check. Your. Facts.

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
3:42 pm

President Hussein Teleprompter will get us bombed.

The Interrogation Memorandums

By Gary Berntsen

This past week President Obama authorized the release of a set of classified memorandums written during the Bush administration. These documents outlined the procedures and tactics employed during the interrogations of captured senior Al Qaeda operatives and have been referred to by the press as the “torture memos”. President Obama’s release of these memos took place despite substantial protest. The four most recent CIA Directors-John Deutch, George Tenet, Porter Goss and Michael Hayden-all recommended against the release of these memorandums. President Obama’s own newly appointed Director of CIA, Leon Panetta, also recommended against releasing the documents. Yet President Obama, in a seemingly relentless effort to discredit his predecessor, George W. Bush, made the memorandum available to the public anyway.

In taking this action, President Obama has effectively defined the limits of what America, at its most aggressive and most passive, would do against Al Qaeda detainees. This will undoubtedly allow groups like Al Qaeda to adjust the preparation and training of their operatives. Administration officials as well as some journalists on the left have argued that the President took into consideration the fact that much of the memos’ contents have already made it into the press. This is a hollow defense. Speculation or discussion of these details in the press may allow Al Qaeda and other terrorists to assess potential U.S. capabilities to some extent. But official White House memorandums released to the public, and immediately downloadable online, are the gold standard for Al Qaeda.

Line of Secession |

April 22nd, 2009
3:43 pm

[...] Bob Barr doesn’t think that secession talk is all that nutty: On April 14, Perry expressed his “unwavering support for efforts all across our country to reaffirm the states’ rights affirmed by the 10th Amendment.” [...]

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
3:43 pm

President Hussein Teleprompter also hates the United States of America.

Obama Blames America

Demonizing Harry Truman may not play well with voters.


The president of the United States has completed another outing abroad in his now standard form: as the un-Bush. At one stop after another — the latest in Latin America, where Hugo Chávez expressed wishes to be his friend — Barack Obama fulfilled his campaign vows to show the nations of the world that a new American leadership stood ready to atone for the transgressions of the old.

All went as expected in these travels, not counting certain unforeseen results of that triumphal European tour. The images of that trip, in which Mr. Obama dazzled ecstatic Europeans with citations of the offenses against international goodwill and humanity committed by the nation he leads, are now firmly imprinted on the minds of Americans. That this is so, and that it is not good news for him, is truth of a kind not quite fathomable to this president and his men.

Ron Roberts

April 22nd, 2009
3:50 pm

I love how those blogging form the “right” can only do so with trivial, childish name-calling (i.e. “Democrap,” “libtard,” etc.). It works in-line with their juvenile “take my ball and go home” mentality after losing the last round of elections.

I don’t remember any “tea parties” when Bush and Reagan ran up then-record deficits. And Reagan was a FAR bigger violator, considering his highest tax rate was at FIFTY percent for the highest wage-earners. Nobody called HIM a socialist for “re-distributing the wealth” then, did they? Funny how that works.

Texas Johnny

April 22nd, 2009
4:00 pm

Texas joined the Union as an already independent nation, unique among the states. The ability to seceed was part of the deal with the Federal Government at the time Texas joined the others. Texas has always been proud of its independence. Even the state capitol faces away from Washington by design.

I for one will take my family and swim the Red River, if I have to, when Texas seceeds.

See ya.


April 22nd, 2009
4:04 pm

Secessionist talk isn’t extreme? It’s extremely weird. And kind of pathetic.


April 22nd, 2009
4:33 pm

“Real Patriot” personifies the kind of ultra-nationalism that ought to scare the hell out of every American. He probably would have made a great brown shirt.


April 22nd, 2009
4:45 pm

There was a time in this country when the constitution protected the minority from the majority and the federal government felt bound by its limits on their power. That time passed with Lincoln.

It is tragic that most people in this country feel that victory in an election is a green light to political oppression of the losers. Yes, both democrats and republicans feel this way. Once, it hardly mattered who was elected since their election could not destroy the economy, ruin the monetary system, impoverish the population, enslave the 18 year-olds for the purpose of domestic slavery or imperial conquest, or otherwise impact anyone’s life in any serious manner.

Now, those of us who can actually read and understand the meaning of the constitution and who have appreciation for the america it was meant to create and protect, just want our freedom back. We are not republican or democrat. We are americans in search of freedom. Secession was embodied in the constitution and was declared to be imperative by virtually every colony that formed the first united States of America. There should be no need to seceed because other states should not have the right to victimize each other, but that is exactly the way the government now works.

Russians are now predicting our split, and many of the founding fathers envisioned smaller countries than we have now. It is high time we consider such separation as a peaceful means of getting away from the fascist and socialist elements that are destroying this nation. We would all be far better off as 50 independant states with no federal government than we are today. There is no magical wealth that comes from the federal government. It is just stolen from the productive states or printed out of thin air, thus devaluing all the money in savings, etc. I think its high time every state moved toward such a goal. We would likely all be more secure, and certainly more free.


April 22nd, 2009
4:46 pm

Ron Roberts – Skull & Bonesmen Bush Sr/Jr were pure Neocon/RINOs, and Reagan wasn’t an full time, true/real (paleo)conservative. The GOP has become infested with Machiavellian, Trotskyite Neocons, who deceive many (well meaning) Americans into believing the GOP is truly conservative. However, the DNC is no better (& worse on many issues). The net is that BOTH GOP & DNC “leadership” are 2 sides of the same coin…controlled by the Globalist Elite. From a party prospective, the only viable choices are Libertarian & Constitution, as the RNC/DNC system has been co-opt’d by the Internationalist agenda.

Red Foreman

April 22nd, 2009
4:48 pm

The Confederacy will rise again…God help the poor unarmed libtards!!!

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
5:02 pm

Ron Roberts, I love how you totally ignore the name calling from left wingers. Shows how hypocritical you really are.


April 22nd, 2009
5:08 pm

Frankly, as an American, I am getting tired of this seccession nonsense whether from the left ot the right. For a former U.S. Attorney to attempt to justify it is outrageous. Also, as a historian, I am appalled at the misuse of history to try to explain how seccession is somehow legal.
Some facts:
1. It was not due to any fear of putting seccessionist on trial and a sense that the Court would find such a right of seccession to exist. The Court was full of Unionist and Republicans, mant of whom had lost friends or relatives in putting down the rebellion. To think that such individuals would have found a legal right for an action that had caused them such loss is naive. Further, the individuals on the Court accepted the legal doctrine of the people forming the Union, not the states, thereby making the Union binding with no right of seccession. Moreover, there was a great cry for severe punishment, including hanging of many Confederate leaders. The rason for the lack of trial was the surrender terms proposed by Grant based upon the polioy of Lincoln (at the 1865 Hampton Roads Conference) to avoid what he saw as actions that would merely increase bitterness. Jefferson Davis, when caught, was, in fact, imprisoned for quite some time. For policy reasons and to avoid his matrydom, he was released, not for any fear of a court ruling legalizing seccession.
2. As Lincoln showed in 1861, no American President can peacefully let any state secede. Instead, if necessary, seccession will be put down by armed force. Politicians who play this seccessionist game know that but think its to their benefit to inflame folks. In Texas, Perry is merely poistioning himself against Sen. Hutchinson in the Republican primary for Governor by running to the right of the conservative Senator.
3. There was an election and the conservatives lost. There is another election in 2010 and they have their chance then. In a democratic republic, for a minority to seek to invalidate and election by dissoloving the country is to raise the old spectre that only dictatorship and monarchies can survive as major nations, thereby giving greater credit to Nazi German and Communist Russia than history has, in fact, allowed. Please don’t make the old canard that we now have a dictatorship and that the President is somehow both a fascist and a socualist. That is not a serious argument and is contradictory on its face.
4. I wonder when I read some of these posts if these same folks were attacking the President and other Democrats about their lack of patriotism and love of country earlier? I guess that that only counted when you got your way. By the way, I also served in the U.S. Marines and spent a career in law enforcment/criminal justice, so please spare the attacks on my patriotism, I have never called for seccession, nor will I ever do so. I have too much faith in our Constitution and the good sense of the America people (of all colors and ethnic origins) to believe that the nation is incapable of change.

Bob Barr

April 22nd, 2009
5:10 pm

I appreciate the many comments I’ve been receiving in response to my BarrCode blogs, including all those received today in response to my blog regarding Gov. Rick Perry’s use of the “S word” (”secession”)last week. The fact that this blog in particular has sparked such interest is evidence it has accomplished its purpose — forcing people to reflect on the serious damage being visited on our country, and on the states that comprise it, as a result of the unbridled, improper and costly growth of federal government power in recent decades. And remember, every bit of power the federal government acquires is at the direct cost of individual liberty.

Ron Roberts

April 22nd, 2009
5:39 pm

Glenn, a similar report about “left-wing extremists” didn’t get NEARLY as much media exposure as the “right-wing extremists” report did. So much for left-media bias. “Democrap” I did a quick scan through this blog and find the name-calling coming FAR more from the right than the left. I’m not being a hypocrite when I call ‘em as I read ‘em. Your very sign-on name speaks volumes. Some of us are man enough to speak our minds w/out using a shield to hide who we are.

Democrap Party

April 22nd, 2009
5:48 pm

Ron Roberts, you should scan through Bookmans and Wootens blogs. You’ll find plenty of names there. Oh, and my blog handle is exactly what I think the democrat party is. CRAP!

Democrap Pary

April 22nd, 2009
6:07 pm

Well, looks like that stimulus package didn’t work after all. Oh well, President Teleprompter Hussein will just go get more money from the evil rich. Looks like the Texas Governor has a point.

Sources: GM to shut many US plants up to 9 weeks

AP Sources: GM to close most US factories for up to 9 weeks this summer to reduce inventory

DETROIT (AP) — Two people briefed on the plan say General Motors Corp. will close most of its U.S. factories for up to nine weeks this summer because of slumping sales and growing inventories of unsold vehicles.

The people did not know exactly when the shutdowns would occur, but both say they will include the normal two-week closure in July to change from one model year to the next. Neither person wanted to be identified because workers have not been told of the shutdowns.

GM spokesman Chris Lee would not comment other than to say the company notifies employees before making any production cuts public.

GM is living on $13.4 billion in government loans and faces a June 1 deadline to restructure or seek bankruptcy protection.


April 22nd, 2009
7:40 pm


So would you yourself actually support the use of military force to prevent a state from peacefully separating from the Union? Would you be willing to pull the trigger yourself? Would you support your son or other male relative if they were part of a bloody domestic Counter-Secession campaign? I hope not. I also hope you would not agree with executing leaders of secessionist movements. Would you be willing to perform the executions yourself?

I guess I always (naively) assumed that Americans were live and let live people at heart and had evolved since the barbaric days of the 1860’s. After decades of supporting other peoples around the world in their struggles for self-determination, I wrongly believed they would consider the use of military force and martial law against their fellow Americans a non-option.
Sadly, this whole dialogue has opened my eyes to the fact that many, if not most Americans are warmongers and would be more than willing to impose their form of political centralization on unwilling subjects at the point of a bayonet. I hope you and others who feel the way you do are not going to observe Independence Day this July 4th, since it’s obvious the idea of government deriving its just powers from the consent of the governed is all but dead if what you say is true.


April 22nd, 2009
8:25 pm

If Texas would seceed, I would relocate there.

John Gaither

April 22nd, 2009
8:27 pm

I don’t agree alot with Bob Barr but on this one I couldn’t agree more. It tickles me that the media thinks this is a ridiculous notion but succession is just not a “right wing” idea it is a idea that has been in the republic’s politics from the very beginning. It has usually reared its head when one portion of the country has obtained a disproportionate advantage in power but this time it is more about those representing us, blatantly and arrogantly ignoring input on the fiscal issues. I have voted in every election since 1978, I don’t own a gun, and if I had my choice we would not mix religion and government, I voted for Clinton twice,yet I am so fed up with Washington I would support Georgia considering the succession idea. How else to get Washington’s attention? I want less government, not more. Adams,Jackson,Lincoln, all were presidents who fought to preserve the Union because they felt we were a stronger nation united–for trade and commerce, personal freed,and defense. With the fiscal and electorial actions of the last 5 years–Bush, Obama,republicans and democrats–I am not sure staying in the union we reinforce any of these ideals.


April 22nd, 2009
8:40 pm

Texas’ economy would grow by leaps and bounds if it creates a pro business economy without the punishing burden of greater than 50% taxation. Texas could probably protect itself better from the mass wave of illegals without having to worry about a government that refuses to act. All in all I think Texas could provide itself with far better services than the federal government ever could.

That was the whole purpose of having individual states in the first place. The founding fathers made the federal government weak for a reason. Many of you should go read a real history book. Perhaps you could learn something.

Ron Roberts

April 22nd, 2009
10:59 pm

Those who’d flee America for an indpendent Texas would make America a better place, frankly; the suburban, gas-guzzling SUV-driving, war-first/reasons-later crowd are as repsonsible as ANY for why this country’s where it is now. That, and the trumped up “values crowd” who pulled church-goers “puppet strings” to lure ‘em to the voting booth to vote their way while scaring off the scary boogey-men (gay married people).

Hey Democrap…small problem w/the article you cite is this – GM’s avoiding bankruptcy by shuttering their plants for 9 weeks. And I believe Toyota’s about to do the same thing – you know, the JAPANESE-owned car-maker. Of course, the Japanese, Europeans, hell the rest of the world acknowledges this recesion is American-made. You know, during the LAST presidency.


April 23rd, 2009
1:43 am

Texas gets back what over 80 cents of every tax dollar they send to washington. Yep spending all that money is stupid,yep thats why Senator Burr (R) after being briefed by Hank Paulson in the fall. He got so scared he called his wife and said start taking money out as quickly as possible. They play to the sheep but the right knows that money had to be spent. All people stupidly yelling let it all fall, would of cr*pped themselves if it all collapsed. They are sheep like holding signs dont raise my taxes numbnuts 95 of the country is getting their taxes lowered.Its all sore losers it really is when bush was cutting taxes and going to war spending away on the chinese credit card no one had tea parties or said squat.

Chris Broe

April 23rd, 2009
6:32 am

Surely the lurkers can see the pathos here. Motley bands of chanters. Directionless viciousness. Blind justice holding a sword instead of a scale. Secessionists squandering any Federal reconciliation. Scoundrels trying to invent another flag to refuge behind.

All this is because we can’t get out of Iraq, which also wants to succeed from our Union, but can’t. We ain’t never gonna git outta Iraq. Hate to flash a reality on this blog, but what is the mission of US troops in Iraq. Bob Barr can’t face the war he cheered so ravenously in a galaxy far, far away. If this man would write one real comment that stood as a logical imperative from either news or history, then maybe I’d respect him. Instead, we get the in-vitro form of fertilizer from this born-again zygote of fable, rib and fib. A cad clad in the bad. (a very bad cad). His writing stinks too.



April 23rd, 2009
7:52 am

Is Governor Perry willing to suffer the same fate as Jefferson Davis after the U.S. brings Texas back into the fold after it’s all said and done?