<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THINNER YOU: Facts on 100-calorie snack packs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/2009/08/06/thinner-you-facts-on-100-calorie-snack-packs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/2009/08/06/thinner-you-facts-on-100-calorie-snack-packs/</link>
	<description>Advice and suggestions for taking care of you and your family</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:18:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Healthy Halloween Treats &#124; The PTI Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/2009/08/06/thinner-you-facts-on-100-calorie-snack-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-2770</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthy Halloween Treats &#124; The PTI Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/?p=962#comment-2770</guid>
		<description>[...] 100 calorie snack packs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 100 calorie snack packs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: promark420</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/2009/08/06/thinner-you-facts-on-100-calorie-snack-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>promark420</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/?p=962#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>When did food stop being food? I&#039;m not off my rocker; look at ingredients lists for most items found in grocery stores. Ingredients lists shouldn&#039;t read like a science experiment; it should read like a recipe. Nutritional quality should be more important than quantity, meaning that 100 empty calories are less useful than 100 nutritious calories. I applaud this story. I&#039;ll add that one ounce of almonds is deceiving if you have small hands like I do, but they sure are filling. 

A great book to pick up is &quot;Eat This, Not That.&quot; It reveals a lot of facts surrounding healthy-sounding foods and meals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did food stop being food? I&#8217;m not off my rocker; look at ingredients lists for most items found in grocery stores. Ingredients lists shouldn&#8217;t read like a science experiment; it should read like a recipe. Nutritional quality should be more important than quantity, meaning that 100 empty calories are less useful than 100 nutritious calories. I applaud this story. I&#8217;ll add that one ounce of almonds is deceiving if you have small hands like I do, but they sure are filling. </p>
<p>A great book to pick up is &#8220;Eat This, Not That.&#8221; It reveals a lot of facts surrounding healthy-sounding foods and meals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/2009/08/06/thinner-you-facts-on-100-calorie-snack-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/?p=962#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>I just had 6oz of yogurt w/80 calories - so there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had 6oz of yogurt w/80 calories &#8211; so there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 healthy after-school snacks for a $1 &#124; Atlanta Bargain Hunter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/2009/08/06/thinner-you-facts-on-100-calorie-snack-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>10 healthy after-school snacks for a $1 &#124; Atlanta Bargain Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/?p=962#comment-1258</guid>
		<description>[...] your kids&#8217; hands on something that&#8217;s good for them, right? Or, you might even turn to 100-calorie snack packs, but are they good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your kids&#8217; hands on something that&#8217;s good for them, right? Or, you might even turn to 100-calorie snack packs, but are they good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wait A Minute</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/2009/08/06/thinner-you-facts-on-100-calorie-snack-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator>Wait A Minute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 19:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/?p=962#comment-1255</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the information presented in this article. But I am one of those people who purchase 100-calories snacks, usually Ritz Snack Mix. I keep a food diary so portion control is essential to my accounting of what I eat. Yes, once or twice, I have eaten 2 packs instead of one, but so what? Even if you ate the entire 6-serving box, you would consume less calories than if you ate a can of Pringles!

Secondly, some of the suggested &quot;smart snack alternatives&quot;, may i fact be low calories, but they are full of salt and/or  loaded with carbs and (mostly good) fat.

My 100-calorie snack has just over 220 mg of sodium, that&#039;s the biggest draw back of the deal, it&#039;s not calories, or even .5mg of trans fat, it&#039;s the salt! This article doesn&#039;t even mention that, yet high blood pressure is on the rise in all ethnic groups.

Lastly, I never pay $3. Yesterday, I paid $2. When not on sale, the cost is around $2.50.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the information presented in this article. But I am one of those people who purchase 100-calories snacks, usually Ritz Snack Mix. I keep a food diary so portion control is essential to my accounting of what I eat. Yes, once or twice, I have eaten 2 packs instead of one, but so what? Even if you ate the entire 6-serving box, you would consume less calories than if you ate a can of Pringles!</p>
<p>Secondly, some of the suggested &#8220;smart snack alternatives&#8221;, may i fact be low calories, but they are full of salt and/or  loaded with carbs and (mostly good) fat.</p>
<p>My 100-calorie snack has just over 220 mg of sodium, that&#8217;s the biggest draw back of the deal, it&#8217;s not calories, or even .5mg of trans fat, it&#8217;s the salt! This article doesn&#8217;t even mention that, yet high blood pressure is on the rise in all ethnic groups.</p>
<p>Lastly, I never pay $3. Yesterday, I paid $2. When not on sale, the cost is around $2.50.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Diet Reporter &#8211; Daily Weight Loss Headlines</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/2009/08/06/thinner-you-facts-on-100-calorie-snack-packs/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>The Diet Reporter &#8211; Daily Weight Loss Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/better-health/?p=962#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>[...] Facts on 100-calorie snack packs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facts on 100-calorie snack packs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
