Comments on: NCAA must find another way on Bowden case

By: mastepoc

mastepoc — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:53:26 +0000

Another great list. I’m meeting more friendly and helpful bloggers each week. Great Idea

By: splbkean

splbkean — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:33:23 +0000

Я бы сказал, что достаточно интересно и я соглашусь почти со всеми, кто комментировал раньше

By: skidoknet

skidoknet — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:52:11 +0000

Чётко, кратко и интересно. Наверное правильно говорят, что краткость сестра таланта

By: cauna

cauna — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:36:56 +0000

Отличная работа

By: linuxgid

linuxgid — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:34:19 +0000

В этом что-то есть и мне нравится эта идея, я полностью с Вами согласен.

By: hosterzru

hosterzru — Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:02:49 +0000

Загляньте на мой мега дор))))

By: Bama12

Bama12 — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:50:00 +0000

Alabama “self reported” a violation and was given the 2nd worst penalty ever handed down by the NCAA so I don’t see that point as a reason not to hold Bowden responsible for something that did help him get more victories. If the crime added to his win total then take them away. My problem with the NCAA is why has USC not been help accountable in the Reggie Bush deal or Ohio State for a booster “loaning” a car to Maurice C? Why are some top schools help to higher standards while others are allowed to cruise on by?

By: steve merker

steve merker — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:24:13 +0000

Your article is amusing in respect for not telling FSU’s and other Florida schools academic cheating and other serious offenses over the years. If you think Bowden or his staff did not know about his players
academic problems, then you have issues. The win losses will send a message to other schools. Bowden deserves to lose those wins.come on now,his players can not pass a music class.

By: Darrin

Darrin — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:50:16 +0000

Here is the crux of the issue, Tony:

The minute those players cheated, they became ineligible per NCAA rules. Those ineligible players then played in games, making the results of those games null and void. It doesn’t matter whether those players were ineligible because of academics, getting paid by boosters, or taking banned substances. It also doesn’t matter if the coaches knew about it. By using ineligible players, they had a competitive advantage over teams who were playing by the rules.

Also, St. Bobby sings a different tune when it is his turn to get roasted by the NCAA. He sure had different thoughts about it back when he was on the other side of the ineligibility fence (1983):

http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1347&dat=19831109&id=vyUVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=mvsDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5110,3169571

Care to ask him about that?

By: Football Encyclopedia

Football Encyclopedia — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:00:18 +0000

31 wins at Howard College from 1959 to 1962 should not count for Saint Bobby Bowden anyway!
Joe Paterno never coached little league college football and Bowden should admit there is no comparison. Penn State is no Howard College ( now powerful Samford U.) —Reveal all the facts!