8:29 pm February 12, 2012, by Melissa Ruggieri
Sure, Chris Brown is a phenomenal dancer, but I thought the Grammys required performers to sing live. After all, it is the GRAMMYS.
That does not seem to be the case during this performance by Mr. Brown.
What do you think – is he singing? Shouldn’t the Grammys have higher standards than, say, the MTV Awards?
News, photos, previews and reviews of concerts, plus your latest hot ticket info
LN = Live Nation, 1-877-598-8698, livenation.com
TM = Ticketmaster, 404-249-6400, ticketmaster.com
TA = Ticketalternative, 1-877-725-8849, ticketalternative.com
• The Atlanta 50: What to See and Do, our inside scoop on Atlanta’s vibrant cultural and leisure scene, including tips on parking, where you should go and best times to avoid big crowds. Order e-book guide today.
PLUS:
• The Atlanta 50: Where to eat, John Kessler's e-book and print guide to 50 of the top area restaurants.
Looking for more? ▲
Reach the audience you want by advertising on accessAtlanta.com
Advertisers and Publishers, expand your reach by joining the Access Atlanta Network.
Visitor Agreement | Privacy Statement | About our ads
© 2013 The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
3 comments Add your comment
Music Lover
February 12th, 2012
10:49 pm
I really do not care..I think he was singing at one point. We all know he can sing. I really wanted to see him perform.
Browncoat
February 12th, 2012
10:54 pm
No, because his voice stinks…. that’s why ne needs auto-tune.
jalson
February 13th, 2012
12:58 pm
Its extremely difficult, if not impossible, to sing well and dance and do acrobatics at the same time. So no, it should be judged by the overall performance, and not just whether or not he had to lip synch a little while doing all of those physical moves. [And, I am not necessarily a Chris Brown fan, just realistic about stage performance]