Moderated by Tom Sabulis
A political war is being waged for control of Fulton County. Republicans in the General Assembly have filed bills aimed, they say, at getting the county to rein in spending and improve services. The county argues the proposed legislation will force traumatic cuts to libraries and Grady Memorial Hospital. Today, a House leader writes that the county is trying to scare citizens in order to avoid sound fiscal management. The county commission chairman counters that the bills are more divisive than helpful.
Commenting is open below.
By Jan Jones
As a 30-year Fulton County resident, I’ve shared my neighbors’ frustration with an unwieldy county government lacking competence on critical services only it can perform — and that nearby counties perform well.
No wonder residents voted overwhelmingly to create the cities of Sandy Springs, Johns Creek, Milton and Chattahoochee Hills. The result: better service levels at lesser cost.
These changes bear a message for all Georgians: Bold, thoughtful change and a strong stomach can fix vexing problems in our communities.
Alas, Fulton elections, jails and other services marginalize citizens’ voices – and provide marginal services at staggeringly disproportionate costs.
Since Fulton is our capital county and home to 10 percent of Georgia’s population, its failures also disproportionately affect the entire metro Atlanta region.
To rein in out-of-control spending and give homeowners tax relief, the Georgia House recently gave two-thirds approval to a higher homestead exemption, legislation I crafted. This is not a new idea. The legislation I authored would essentially have the same effect as a 2008 bill introduced and widely supported by House Democrats.
Five of seven county commissioners have protested that a modest display of fiscal responsibility will necessitate cuts in Grady Memorial Hospital funding. The facts simply don’t support that conclusion.
Fulton spends 121 percent more per capita than neighboring, similarly sized Gwinnett County and 68 percent more than Cobb County, excluding expenditures on Grady and MARTA. After the homestead exemption is fully phased in, Fulton would still spend 100 percent more per capita than Gwinnett — again, excluding Grady’s cost.
The answer isn’t to cut Grady’s funding. The answer is to cut the waste that has pervaded nearly every other Fulton service.
A 2009 joint study by University of Georgia and Georgia State University showed Fulton grossly exceeded expenditures of comparable counties in almost every service. Some examples:
• Fulton commissioners spent $2,211 per Child Protective Service investigation in DFACS, on average. Cobb and Gwinnett spent $148 per investigation.
• Fulton spent roughly double that of Cobb and Gwinnett administering each parcel in the tax assessor’s and tax commissioner’s offices.
• Its purchasing department costs were more than double those of Cobb and Gwinnett.
Little has changed since then. Today, Fulton spends 66 and 158 percent more per capita on library staffing than Gwinnett and Cobb, respectively, despite lower library materials circulation than both counties. Each commissioner enjoys a $400,000 budget for his personal office and staff, three times that of Cobb and Gwinnett. And last year, Fulton spent $840,000 on contract and in-house lobbyists.
Yet a constitutionally required service, the county jail, lacked 1,300 secure cell door locks for a decade. The locks are finally being replaced, but long after warnings from three consecutive sheriffs. Compliance costs exceeded $100 million for court-ordered federal oversight of dangerous jail conditions.
Last November, mishandled elections led to an investigation by Secretary of State Brian Kemp and an historic number of provisional ballots cast due to elections staff errors.
If approved by voters, the homestead exemption increase would be phased in over three years beginning in 2015, giving Fulton plenty of time to figure out how the rest of Georgia delivers better services at reasonable costs.
A dozen other reform bills are in process to improve Fulton through changes that can only be accomplished legislatively, such as modernizing MARTA, increasing the threshold required to raise property taxes, and reforming the courts and elections board. Others would end the tax commissioner’s built-in incentive to pad his yearly compensation to $350,000, implement a performance-based employee system, and create six commission districts closer to the people and one countywide chairman.
My message to Fulton commissioners: Stop scaremongering, cut the waste, and improve the constitutionally required services that residents can’t get elsewhere. And quit treating Grady like the proverbial whipping boy.
Jan Jones, R-Milton, is House Speaker Pro Tem.
By John Eaves
The charges against Fulton County by North Fulton legislators are that the county is bloated, unresponsive and unrepresented. Let me first set the record straight on a few things.
Fact: A considerable percentage of Fulton’s budget goes to constitutionally mandated services such as the jail, courts and Board of Registration and Elections. You, the people of Fulton County, elect or appoint through your local political parties who you think are the best people to lead those services. If you feel those services are lacking or poorly managed, you, the voter, have the power to enact change, whereas the Board of Commissioners does not and the Legislature should not.
Fact: Fulton has the second-lowest overall government expenditures per capita of the major metro Atlanta counties — lower than both Gwinnett and DeKalb counties, despite having twice the number of service facilities such as libraries.
Fact: Fulton has managed within its budget by reducing spending by $61,076,505 from 2007 to 2012. The Board of Commissioners reduced spending by $8.7 million from 2012 to 2013.
And most important:
Fact: Fulton is the only large county in metro Atlanta that has not increased its millage rate since the beginning of the Great Recession. In fact, Fulton hasn’t raised its property tax rate since 1991.
HB 541 proposes to double the homestead exemption from $30,000 to $60,000 over three years. HB 604 would suspend the board’s ability to increase the millage rate beyond the roll-back rate until Jan. 1, 2015. After that date, any increase in the millage rate would require the affirmative votes of five of the members of the Board of Commissioners.
Sounds good, doesn’t it? Who doesn’t appreciate what amounts to an ongoing tax cut? But this legislation comes with a hefty price tag. Passage of these bills would mean a loss in county revenue of almost $50 million dollars. That would mean drastic cuts in county services, most importantly those provided by Grady Memorial Hospital.
Here are the facts regarding HBs 541 and 604:
Fact: Fulton already has the highest homestead exemption rate in the state of Georgia.
Fact: Approximately 80 percent of Fulton’s revenue comes from property taxes.
Fact: Doubling the homestead exemption would shift the burden of property taxes to commercial property owners and homeowners with more valuable homes. If the county is forced to do a revenue-neutral millage-rate adjustment, businesses and many homeowners in North Fulton will shoulder the tax burden.
The loss of almost $50 million dollars would, without doubt, mean a reduction in funding to Grady, which provides trauma and health care services to Georgians throughout the state. We will all suffer greatly if Grady is adversely impacted. The question will be, who will step up to fill the void if funds are lost?
There is more at stake here than money. Georgia is a “home rule” state, embracing the conservative principle of local control. The state constitution grants cities, municipalities and counties the ability to pass laws to govern themselves. I believe this legislation violates that rule, and I don’t think we want to set that precedent.
I acknowledge we have challenges within Fulton County. I am ready and willing to negotiate county parity in services and equal representation as long as we tackle these issues in the spirit of togetherness. Divisive and overreaching legislation is not the way to solve our differences and will only hurt the very residents we are here to serve.
John Eaves is chairman of the Fulton County Commission.
14 comments Add your comment
Van Jones
March 22nd, 2013
12:10 pm
@LMAO “Fulton County is the most fiscally conservative county in the nation…”
There is NO WAY anyone can read that and not laugh.
@USC Didn’t take long for the race card to come out.
Dave
March 22nd, 2013
11:32 am
I don’t know Rep. Jones’ views on local government; but, most Republicans are for things like “home rule” and don’t like it when the big boys and girls in Washington shove things down their throats. I guess there’s an exception for when they are the big boys and girls shoving their views down the throats of Fulton County, I would note duly elected, officials. Reading the article and watching Fulton County government over the years, I think the duly elected officials in Fulton have some work to do; but, isn’t it their work? If they keep getting re-elected despite their flaws, aren’t they what their constituents want?
Rockerbabe
March 22nd, 2013
11:03 am
If the citizens of Fulton County do not like what the elected officials are doing, it is THEIR responsibilty to fix it, not the state’s responsibiltiy. I do not think Fulton County is any worse off than any other county, that is not minority run. The state needs to keep its hands off the county government and its activities.
Wayout_inCobb
March 22nd, 2013
10:34 am
Reminds me in many respects of Jamaica or the Dominican Republic.
LMAO
March 22nd, 2013
9:24 am
Amazing how that wicked people can actually be. Fulton County is the most fiscally conservative county in the nation and that’s not enough. It’s only because its run by minorities. What’s worse is Jan Jones, Wendell Willard and that crowd can continue to lie and people believe them. First of all the “Study” they continually refer to is from 2007 and 2009 BEFORE and DURING the Recession when Fulton coffers were nearly flushed with cash. Those dollars are long gone. The county has parred down its budget and staff greatly since then. If it not run well then why does Standard & Poor give it a AA rating?
Second, this is about the minority party (GOP) wanting to run a majority Democratic County. Look at the last federal election. President Obama won by almost 120,000 votes! Tell me where does a republican have room to ask for more when they are not the majority party in the county. It can only be done by the force of the state of Georgia. It’s not black and white. It’s that only if you think every black person is a democrat and every white person is a republican. Oddly enough there are MORONS in this state the thinks that’s the case. See @Don’t Tread above, that’s the typical bigot response when you discuss politics. Gwinnett is the only county I know that has three Commissioners removed or resigned from office for criminal activities in the last few years and the they were all WHITE!
Don't Tread
March 22nd, 2013
8:56 am
I don’t have a dog in this fight, but you couldn’t pay me enough money to live in Fulton County (or DeKalb, or Clayton). Talk about corruption and mismanagement! 10 YEARS without sufficent cell door locks?! $400k budget for each commissioner?
Oh, and by the way, good luck with the “performance based” employee system. The Jesse and Al Race Baiting Traveling Circus won’t let that happen.
Concerned Citizen
March 22nd, 2013
6:51 am
Having lived in South Fulton County for over 50 years, I can tell you that the reason that the property tax rate hasn’t increased since 1991 is that the rate was far to high to begin with. In addition, instead of increasing the property tax rate county wide, the county has year after year increased individual property assessments so that taxes continue to rise at an uncontrolled rate. We pay some of the highest property taxes in the state and our county services are a joke. I praise the state legislature for getting involved because the Fulton County Commission has had more than enough time to curb spending on their own. As far as Grady is concerned, the vast majority of Fulton County residents do not use it anyway and even if we did, we would have to pay for the services. It is time for the state or Obama-care to pick up the tab for Grady. Otherwise, either reign in wasteful county spending or close it.
USC
March 22nd, 2013
6:24 am
Rather than help out, Jan Jones (her smirking picture says it all) just wants to cut and run. She is part of a large, mostly white, rich crowd that still remembers the attempts at continued segregation in the sixties and its failure. She would fit in nicely with the New Orleans “Cheerleaders” that John Steinbeck described so elegantly in “Travels With Charley.” Those days are over. Our country will now go through that evolution when the aged youth of the sixties who were unable to comprehend the Peace and Love movement of their generation, have corralled themselves in gated communities, purchased huge supplies of Assault weapons, gas masks, bullets, private guards, etc. Now they wait anxiously for the attack, counting their money each evening like Silas Marner. Disgusting. Selfish. and, in the end, Self-Destructive.
George
March 21st, 2013
4:59 pm
As I recall from a few years ago, a study had reported that Fulton County was one of the least efficiently run governments in the country. The county responded basically admitting that efficiency was not necessarily their goal, that the county’s problems were unique, that they had a disproportionate number of poor and disadvantaged people who need services, etc. Fine, but can’t these problems be addressed in some sort of thoughtful and business- like manner? It is a different time now. There is no money to waste. The county should be open to constructive criticism and make the needed “reforms” because the taxpayers have had it with business as usual.
SAWB
March 21st, 2013
4:30 pm
It would be nice to see reform championed by the Fulton County Commission instead of mandated by the State, but I fear that will never happen in the current format.
Maybe a better idea would be to eliminate the two at large Commission positions and create two new districts one in the northern and one in the southern portions of the county. Then maybe the voters would elect reform minded candidates who could actually change the system from the inside.