Common work lies ahead for the ATL

Atlantans share commonalities, whether we live in Stockbridge or Suwanee. We waste hours in traffic, and worry about neighborhood schools or the foreclosed home down the street. In the broadest sense, we share a common destiny.
That makes it worth pondering how we can better work together, neighbor with neighbor, to improve our lives, communities and region. That’s as American a concept as it comes, talking earnestly amongst ourselves to identify common challenges, then finding ways to resolve them to mutual benefit. Who of sound reason can oppose that?
As of August 1, that became a tougher task around here after voters sent down the T-SPLOST to landslide defeat.
That vote was seen by many as a stark repudiation of both regionalism and the unanimous approval by elected leaders of the transportation tax’s much-maligned project list.
Tad Leithead, chairman of the Atlanta Regional Commission, doesn’t see that as an end to working together as a region. Neither do we. During the ARC’s State of the Region breakfast last month, Leithead praised the unanimity of the area’s political leaders around a common cause. Such actions are a necessary tactic for success in a competitive nation and world economy, we believe. Winning metros in this global game will master the art of reasoning together. Losers will unproductively bicker in arenas of circular arguments, leaving vital work undone.
In seeking to dispel any thoughts of a post-T-SPLOST regional funk, Leithead proclaimed that, “Now I believe excellence is not only within our reach, but assuming we can all work together … excellence is virtually guaranteed.”
To bolster his point, Leithead quoted Abraham Lincoln’s 1862 message to Congress. Lincoln wrote that, “We can succeed only by concert. It is not ‘can any of us imagine better?’ but, ‘can we all do better?’ The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise — with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew.”
Logically, that means the Atlanta metro must now think about regional cooperation in a new way. If acting across 10 counties is not now politically acceptable, then we should break down our common problems into smaller chunks and begin to address them county by county, even city by city, if need be. Such a micro approach to problem-solving seems to be gaining ground here among some leaders and civic thinkers, and that is a good thing.
Using the smaller building blocks of, say, two counties working together on mutually agreeable projects, rather than working under a 10-county umbrella, can get done much-needed work.
And we have many big jobs that urgently need to get done here, improving transportation especially, but in other areas as well. We all know that. So let’s start collaborating to resolve them and build a more-prosperous region in the process.

Andre Jackson, for the Editorial Board.

15 comments Add your comment

Robert Grunwald

November 25th, 2012
7:31 pm

This so true what you say. Yet the state will never find way to coperate with each other because we are so dividede. We now hearing that make new stadium for the falcon which cost us the billions of dollars to make. Forgoet t risdudal aspects or for economy. We are so worried about 400 and 285 yet we do nothing for 2-85 and 20 west side. We brand new sports complex bieing buit in bartow county 12 miile cobb county line. Yet bartow is consider not metro atlanta even the newspapers. Our state legitstors have no clue and power brokers don’t care. Yet we have a tranist study forr the last 10 years and we hear nothing about all we is toll lanes 75-575- yet we see how well that working in Gwinnet. We need to address the real problems of Georgia Eduation and Transportion enough said

Dave

November 25th, 2012
8:50 pm

A Google search for “the Atlanta metro” brings up the phrase before a noun, except for a link to this editorial, perhaps because metro and metropolitan are adjectives.

That said, ARC, Mr. Leithead and your board still don’t get it. When droves of tea party folks, liberal, in-town Democrats and most of the rest of us oppose something, it would behoove our leaders to find the common thread in their disapproval rather than berate them for being a part of a non-”Winning metro,” ah that adjective again. Damn those voters, they are “[l]osers [who] unproductively bicker in arenas of circular arguments, leaving vital work undone.” Chances are there’s a flaw in the plan that leads the sheep to not heed their masters’ call. There is vital work to be done in infrastructure and transit; but, our “leaders” pat themselves on the back for unanimously favoring a “plan” that spreads the wealth among them and does little to address the vital work. Then the AJC lauds them and attacks the voters.

Dave

November 25th, 2012
8:57 pm

To be fair, I suppose you can use metro as a noun if you capitalize it and are referring to a specific thing, like a city’s transit system.

Chip

November 26th, 2012
2:20 am

Unbelievable. Absolutely unbelievable.

A majority of tax-paying voters make it absolutely crystal clear, in no uncertain terms, that they wanted no part of the fraudulent and corrupt TSPLOST boondoggle, yet what happens? The Editorial Board arrogantly states that TSPLOST failed because the voters are backwards, primitive, and stupid.

REALLY? SERIOUSLY??

I’m sitting here trying to come up with ripping sarcastic comments about the elitist arrogance of drug-fried urban liberals, yet what’s the point? To be liberal these days is to be a delusional flake and probably a bong-puffer, living in a fantasy land completely detached from day-to-day reality.

Throw in the liberal Intellectual Master Race attitude and other Mental Aryan delusions, and I can’t decide whether to just laugh and shake my head, or prepare for civil war.

middle of the road

November 26th, 2012
6:29 am

Have they removed the toll booths from 400 yet?

commoncents

November 26th, 2012
8:20 am

Grunwald
Thank you for pointing out how bad our education system really is…

commoncents

November 26th, 2012
8:32 am

I hope Leithead doesn’t think voters will approve the next dumb regional transportation project just because T-Splost failed (miserably)

Maybe a transportation plan would work if it actually addressed the issues…

400/285 interchange
400/85 interchange
285/20 interchange

You can’t keep widening major highways without addressing the off ramps.

Out by the Pond

November 26th, 2012
9:07 am

Using smaller building blocks is what we have been doing. Individual counties have been passing local taxes for local projects. Some of these counties use their money wisely and prosper, others squander their money on foolish projects and now want a handout for those who are moving forward.

nelson

November 26th, 2012
9:20 am

You are so right. Working together across the 10 county area is the solution. Neighbor helping neighbor, the way to succeed. Seek one common goal and promote it. Take clean energy, this is a high concern. Solicit subscribers to wind power, clean energy from an endlessly renewable resource. When the populace finds success in doing together, that is the start.

Andre Jackson, Editorial Editor

November 26th, 2012
11:18 am

Uh Chip, my friend,
For the record, nowhere in the Editorial did I use the words “backwards,” “primitive,” or “stupid” or any other words of similar meaning, actually. I don’t do drugs either, unless prescribed by a doc. Admittedly, though, a good number of my old teachers might agree with you on my intellectual capacity.

That said, as for indulging in liberal fantasyland, you’ll notice I hope the op-ed that ran on this page from a well-known local, suburban tea partyer who writes that, under the right conditions, cross-county cooperation and planning will work. He also held out such joint ventures as a good way to get going on needed work that we can agree is worth doing.

MANGLER

November 26th, 2012
12:23 pm

Getting a region of NIMBY’s who would rather ram you off the road than let you merge in while complaining about congestion and air quality after refusing to let mass transit expand, to all work together hasn’t worked and isn’t working .. hence you get officials who just go do things to get them done. Atlantans have shown by voting for the past 30 years that they don’t give a damn about their neighbors, just themselves and their check books. You aren’t going to get leaders to work together if the voters don’t want to.

Nafessa

November 26th, 2012
1:20 pm

“…doesn’t see that as an end to working together as a region. Neither do we.”

The ajc needs to guard against tone-deafness. The people sent a loud ‘n clear message with the T-SPLAT vote, wake up and pay attention.

The only real solution to our regional issues will be leadership at the state level. With 159 counties in Georgia and a dozen plus in metro Atlanta it’s unrealistic to believe that these myriad, self-interested local jurisdictions can work out their problems among themselves.

Tired

November 26th, 2012
4:08 pm

What does the defeat of the T-SPLOST have to do with regional solutions? I didn’t vote against T-SPLOST because of county or region issues. I voted against it because I’m equally confident that the funds will be diverted from their original purpose in rural and urban areas of the state.

Angus

November 26th, 2012
4:34 pm

What you’re advocating is an additional layer of government to do what the state won’t/can’t.

Dave

November 26th, 2012
5:50 pm

So, Andre, despite your quarrel with Chip’s hyperbole, are you getting the idea? People aren’t against improvements and paying for them. They are against perceived boondoggles and arrogance.