Transportation referendum: New ideas, teamwork needed to move ahead

The T-SPLOST’s fate leaves this metro in search of a transportation “Plan B.” The 2-to-1 margin of defeat July 31 led us to turn over today’s page and add another to allow both leaders and average readers to address what’s next and how do we pay for it? We all have a stake in the answers.

Work toward solutions continues

By Nathan Deal

The rejection of T-SPLOST in the metro Atlanta region closes a chapter, but it doesn’t close the book on improving our transportation infrastructure. While voters showed there’s deep disagreement about the best way forward, there’s consensus that we must keep working to ease congestion and get Georgians moving more quickly.

The law that created T-SPLOST was passed before I took office, but I supported it as the best solution we had available to update our transportation corridors. The voters said decisively we should go another way, and we will.

A quarter of Georgia’s regions, convinced that the benefits outweighed the costs, will benefit from having a plan to improve transportation, one that can be marketed to businesses looking to invest and bring jobs. Nine regions were not convinced that the referendum was the right tradeoff and must consider what the path forward should look like. The mixed result is workable, and I will partner with every Georgian to bring the right kind of needed local transportation solutions.

While there were many worthwhile projects in the T-SPLOST, there are many other projects already in progress where work will continue. For example, two reversible managed lanes on I-75 south and north of Atlanta and improvements on Ga. 400 are moving forward.

Georgia has made great investments in infrastructure for over two centuries. We don’t rise or fall on a single vote. We maintain our transportation network far better than most. We value home rule and our low-tax and business-friendly state. We want government to do only what it must, but do it well.

In that vein, our transportation network must perform well. We must focus on reliability to see gains in productivity and an enhanced quality of life.

We will benefit by looking at transportation as a utility. Turn on a faucet or plug in an appliance, and we’re confident that the water or energy will flow. But travel to work in the morning or rely on just-in-time delivery of raw materials, and we’re less confident about the outcome. To remain competitive, we can’t remain this way. We must set new priorities to get better outcomes. We must make the network perform better with existing and declining funding sources. We must be very strategic in making new investments.

Together, we have successfully addressed challenges — HOPE, criminal justice, tax reform. I am open to new ideas and look forward to working with leaders across the state to solve this problem. Together, we will address our transportation challenges by assessing where we are and confidently moving forward to create a more reliable and competitive transportation network.

Nathan Deal is governor of Georgia.

Put funding back where it belongs

By Shirley Franklin

The T-SPLOST’s failure can’t deter us from making big, bold plans. The solution has to make sense to voters, address their priorities and be fair for Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb county voters and MARTA.

Nothing will change for the better without:

A comprehensive regional plan: We already have the basic backbone for a regional rail and bus system. It is MARTA. The state could expand MARTA’s authority, incorporating the power and authority of GRTA and designate state funding for the expansion, creating a new 10-county regional entity. Long-range plans need to incorporate light rail and an intra-county bus system in suburban counties.

The governor’s leadership: We cannot fail to define our region’s future through lack of vision or fear of unpopularity. A regional system cannot be built until the governor and state legislative leaders face their obligations to invest in quality of life infrastructure for over 5 million Georgians living in metro Atlanta. Local elected officials are essential partners, but the leadership is best suited for the governor, who needs a strong metro Atlanta economy as a foundation for a strong state economy.

Tax fairness: Atlanta, Fulton and DeKalb residents have rightly grumbled about tax fairness. If MARTA authority is expanded into 10 counties and the state funds the regional system, the benefits to Fulton, DeKalb and Atlanta residents and voters are clear. For instance, with state funding for a regional system, the current one-cent MARTA tax can be granted an early sunset. With 50 percent of the budget off limits for daily MARTA operations, state law has set MARTA up for failure as Atlanta and the metro region grow.

Funding: No one likes new taxes, but all options should be on the table. A revision of the gas tax laws to allow spending for public transit really is a “no brainer.” Having one of the lowest gas taxes in the nation isn’t a badge of honor in this case. Parking fees are another option. A sales tax is regressive; it hits the lowest wage earners the hardest. However, we can somewhat offset the impact by exempting food and medicine. The one-cent sales tax has to be put back on the table and it has to be fair — everyone should pay for a regional system.

Without vision and leadership, metro Atlanta cannot remain the economic engine of Georgia and Georgia’s economic recovery will continue to lag the national economic recovery.

Shirley Franklin was Atlanta’s mayor, 
2002-10.

Seven Steps Toward Recovery

A.J. Robinson

We haven’t felt this bad since 2008. when a tornado tore through downtown. But we survived, picked up the pieces and got back to business as usual. Four years later, we’re in the wake of another temporary setback and our only choice is to get on with the job of thinking about the future in a positive, innovative way.

Here are seven observations to consider as we work to solve the region’s transportation issues:

1) Change is difficult, and bold change is darn near improbable. We need to be more receptive to bold ideas and take some risks, or else we’ll be spinning in place for generations to come. Kudos to those who had the courage to step up and do the right thing for the region.

2) Regionalism needs to be defined in a different way when discussing transportation. Almost 250,000 people voted in favor of the referendum, but most reside in and around the city of Atlanta. Perhaps that group should take the lead in solving their own priorities, then ask interested political bodies to join in.

3) People in the region complain about traffic congestion, but their distrust of government and concern for their own economic well-being, are much bigger problems.

4) The distrust of state government in Georgia is real but is misplaced when it comes to transportation. There is no evidence of over-budgeted projects or bridges to nowhere. In fact, the state didn’t build the interstate highway 
system, the airport (the city did that with airline revenue) or the freight rail lines. The state makes no investment in 
MARTA, and we have one of the lowest gas taxes in the country, so what’s the beef with state government?

5) The project list was a hard sell. The list was pretty remarkable for those intimately involved in infrastructure work but complicated and too large for most people to grasp. Next time, let’s keep it simple.

6) The business community is alive and well and will continue to push Atlantans and their governments toward solutions to traffic, water, public education and job creation. There is an old axiom in business that says, “If you don’t grow, you die …” If we don’t get our hands around these issues, we can’t grow, period. So, reports that the business community will stop caring about these big issues are unfounded. Our commitment is stronger than ever.

7) Lastly, to Augusta, Columbus and the heart of Georgia region, our hats go off to you for getting it done. We hope to learn something about regionalization from your success.

So, back to the proverbial drawing board. Let’s keep the faith. It’s always dark before the dawn!

A.J. Robinson is president of Central Atlanta Progress

Must keep focus on fixing traffic congestion

By Edward Lindsey

Many of us supported the T-SPLOST, but tens of thousands more opposed it. Nevertheless, our transportation problems have not and will not magically disappear, and most people on both sides of the July 31 vote understand this reality and the seriousness of the crisis we face.

Urban areas – even historically great ones like metro Atlanta – are perpetually either in a period of growth and greater prosperity or steady decline. There is no standing still. We either attack our problems head-on and make a better future for ourselves and our children today, or we sit back and watch our past successes slip away into the history books.

Metro Atlanta commuters have one of the worst commutes in the nation. This translates into more time in our cars and less time for work, home and play. It also wastes on average in fuel for each of us over $900 per year sitting in traffic. Atlanta is ranked 91st out of 100 among major metro regions for access to transit. Major business prospects rank our transportation difficulties as one of their major concerns about relocating here, and our inability to address this problem will only further aggravate their concerns.

Make no mistake, we are not spendthrifts in Georgia. We rank 49th in the nation in overall per capita state spending, and have one of the lowest overall state government tax rates in the country (45th). Over the past four years, we have further reduced our state spending by billions of dollars since the beginning of the Great Recession. These facts demonstrate our fiscal conservatism and are responsible for us having a very rare AAA state bond rating (higher than the federal government’s). Nevertheless, we must understand that while government cannot and should not ever be involved in everything, transportation — along with education and public safety — is an area where government needs to roll up its sleeves and get it right.

Therefore, there is no time to mourn or celebrate about what happened on July 31st regardless of which side you were on. Both sides now need to focus on where we go from here.

Elected officials need to hear from you and other metro residents. So start communicating. Today is for you to talk and for policymakers like me to listen. How do we overcome the extreme mistrust that divides us and come together to fix this traffic noose around our necks?

You and I must answer this question and start moving forward again together. I look forward to your suggestions.

State Rep. Edward Lindsey, R-Atlanta, is Georgia House Majority Whip.

Readers suggest “Plan B” and funding options.

34 comments Add your comment

Out by the Pond

August 11th, 2012
7:19 am

First I question the severity of Atlantas traffic. It’s not that good but my rush hour commutes vs non rush hour commutes have not reveled that much difference in time. Ten additional minuets between East Cobb and Lilburn. 5 minuets between Perimiter Mall and East Cobb. The major time in suburban commutes is distance traveled more than congestion. The commute to downtown Atlanta today I’d faster than in 1965 prior to the interstate highway.

Metro Atlanta need some major fixes in it’s transportation infrastructure. We need a realistic tax to support it. Not a sales tax that weighs most heavily on the elderly and poor. The motor fule tax needs to be adjusted for the improved fuel economy of our present day cars. To equal the effective rate of 1975 the motor fule tax needs to be raised from $0.075 to $0.30. This will never happen but you have to accept that the GDOT will never be able to keep up when its hands are tied behind it’s back. There is no free lunch. We need to pay for the improvements we need and want. We need to raise the motor fuel tax.

Part of a MFT increase should be tied to a regional transportation system. Marta, Gerta, and all the other transportation kingdoms need to be consolidated under the Transportation Department, with planns that not only considers intra regional but inter regional needs. You can not achieve greatness by thinking small or acting parochial. I am suprised that the Atlanta region has come this far with it’s head buried so deep in the sand.

Nicholas J

August 11th, 2012
4:10 am

I find it so sad that many metro Atlantans have such lack of vision. They resist transit for some of the most ignorant reasons and then complain about the issues that happen when they do. Atlanta’s traffic problems will never be solvable through road improvement alone SIMPLY because at rush hour periods you’re trying to cram 2 million or so people onto the same roads.
In order to solve this issue you must provide alternatives to road transportation. People its like Former Mayor Franklin said, we need to stop worrying about unpopularity because it will get us no where. We need to accept the truth that roads will only place a temporary band-aid on the issue. Some people say we’re not dense enough. LA’s extremely dense and still has low ridership. Density has nothing to do with it, its about ridership and whether there are actually enough riders to justify a train system. Metro Atlanta has enough potential riders if the option were to be properly given to them. By placing small, possibly gated parking garages at each suburban light rail or heavy rail stop. You have a way for people to drive to the rail station and park, get on the train and be in the city within 25 minutes, vs an hour. They would spend 5 dollars to get to and from work, much less the price they’ll pay on gallons spent in a car. Ensure the safety of the transit stations because God knows the suburbanites will run from a shadow and there you have it. A cheap, safe, alternative to road transportation that would increase Marta’s ridership and advertising dollars which equal higher revenues. So its simple, they could be stubborn and just refuse to take the cheaper, time saving alternative or keep getting stuck in traffic and burning gas.
We could either embrace rapid transit or we could just keep paving roads and making roads which equal higher pollution, MORE traffic, and more congestion because unless we build a 30 land highway we’ll never keep up with the demand….

ND

August 11th, 2012
3:35 am

T-SPLOST would have had a better chance if it proposed four or five major projects that clearly would have made a big impact, rather than a hundred or so smaller ones that had questionable individual impact.

For example, a big reason for the traffic problems on the top end perimeter and 75 and 85 in the northern suburbs is the presence of trucks mixing with rush hour traffic. A project that would divert them from that route (something similar to the Northern Arc, or maybe separate truck lanes on the top end perimeter) would have worked.

A big reason for traffic on Atlanta’s city streets is that many of them are located in areas where they can’t be easily widened and there is no viable transit alternative for the people using them. Expansion of MARTA rail within the city limits and immediately adjoining areas to connect more population and employment centers within the city would have addressed this problem.

A frequent complaint about public transit from many people in the suburbs is that it doesn’t take them where they want to go fast enough to make it a viable alternative to driving. A suburban commuter rail system, separate from MARTA, with limited stops would offer such an alternative. Other cities, even those with Atlanta-like sprawl, get this to work.

Really the only major projects on that list that would have created new transportation option were the Beltline and the MARTA line to Emory. Maybe if they had been a little more ambitious, both on the road side and the transit side, they would have garnered more support.

Bug

August 11th, 2012
1:59 am

Go up in the air with the down town connector with only on and off ramps at each end for all traffic who does not wish to stop in Atlanta.

SAWB

August 11th, 2012
12:07 am

The Legislature should get out of the business of meddling in MARTA’s affairs. Turn the management of MARTA over to Fulton and DeKalb counties and let them do whatever they wish with it.

SAWB

August 11th, 2012
12:05 am

Yes, by all means let’s hear from the NAACP and Mr. Vinnie Fort. It seemed like what they wanted during the run up to T-SPLOST was an increase in taxes on OTP folks to build more transit for ITP folks while leaving their taxes unchanged. Now, I may very well have misread them, but…

Angus

August 10th, 2012
9:38 pm

nmonroe, that seems to be a well though-out and reasonable post, but I have to object to a couple of things.

10% of the TSPLOST (actually less than that) went to the Beltline for the COA which is about 10% of the population. And, that 10% of the population is virtually the only one that approved the TSPLOST. Why? Because that is what the COA needs and wants – inner city mobility. If you and others insist on ignoring the needs of COA residents by calling the Beltline a streetcar to nowhere (perhaps you’ve confused it with the Auburn Ave streetcar?), we’ll keep ignoring you – how far does that get us?

Also, I have no idea what you mean by “create regional oversight for MARTA.” We already have a state-controlled, do-nothing MARTOC that contributes nothing but restrictions on MARTA. If and when the “region” contributes to MARTA, the “region” can join in the oversight – until then, you absolutely have no say in MARTA’s affairs (for better or for worse.)

nmonroe25

August 10th, 2012
9:04 pm

Number one priority: fix the roads that bear the greatest burden and create the most congestion/disruption, i.e., 400/25, 20/285.

Without a doubt, there is a role for a regional plan. But, despite all the pie in the sky dreams, it must focus on roads first.

Second, we need a regional plan that is based in reality. T-SPLOST allocated more than 10 percent of its total revenue to a streetcar plan to nowhere, better known as the Beltline. This was an unsustainable, unnecessary, and a major factor in the public’s resounding defeat of the initiative. Create regional oversight for MARTA, with a clear mission to link major population areas with buses and, where feasible extensions of the current train system.

Third, fund this work with appropriate gas taxes. I’m a Republican, but I’m sick and tired of Tea Party idealogues resisting any and all taxes. There is simply no other way to adequately fund roads and roadwork; our gas tax structure does not reflect current gas costs and reality, and must be updated. This is the fically responsible thing to do, and it will benefit everyone.

Fourth, legislatively establish the tightest controls possible on contracts and spending. Lowest bid – period. If a minority or disadvantaged vendor wants the work, figure out a way to do it better and cheaper than the next guy. If someone abuses the system, punish them with the strongest possible sentences and banish them for life from ever working with/for state and local governments.

Let’s outline the key projects that will deliver the most immediate relief, fund them, and repeat. Sounds pretty simple…

Bernie

August 10th, 2012
8:55 pm

The constant free flow of communication amount us-enabling the free interchange of ideas-forms the very bloodstream of our nation. It keeps the mind and body of our democracy eternally vital, eternally young.

Franklin D. Roosevelt

Bernie

August 10th, 2012
8:41 pm

This Commentary presented is a good start. We have heard from the Governor, The Georgia & Atlanta Tea Party, Georgia Republican House Majority whip – R, Former Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin -D, and The Sierra Club.

We have still YET to hear from other influential and important members whom are very much in deserving a seat at the Table of commentary. The Georgia NAACP, State Rep Vincent Fort – D, and Mr Evans of The Dekalb Chapter of the NAACP.

Surely, it has not been their desire “NOT” to provide a commentary in this PARTICULAR FORUM, Its because they have NOT been INVITED as participating
commentors by this EDITORIAL BOARD.

I call on this EDITORIAL BOARD to cease in choosing and picking sides this corporate entity 100% agrees and supports and open this forum up to OBJECTIVE and Honest reporting this State,City, and surrounding communities so desperately deserve.

There in lies the very problem as to why this and many other issues cannot be fairly resolved to benefit ALL of Georgia’s citizens. The picking and choosing of those to speak on behalf of the citizens by a HIDDEN hand from some Corporate entity as the AJC.

This Request should be given the seriousness WE ALL DESERVE.

We ALL succeed when WE succeed TOGETHER!