We’re three weeks away from voting on a 1-cent sales tax to fund $8.5 million in transportation improvements in metro Atlanta. (Early voting is open now.) A conservative leader writes that Atlanta companies are intimidating their employees to vote ‘yes’ on July 31 and tax themselves. A Coke executive says better transit and roadways will help workers save time and keep local businesses humming.
Tom Sabulis is today’s moderator. Commenting is open following John Brock’s column below.
By Sadie Fields
Voter intimidation is wrong no matter who does it.
Voter intimidation can be as extreme as when members of the New Black Panther Party stood out front of a polling place in Philadelphia on Election Day 2008 wearing paramilitary garb, with one carrying a nightstick.
In our own backyard, voter intimidation is taking a more subtle approach as exhibited by the Metro Atlanta Chamber regarding the upcoming T-SPLOST vote. The business community is calling employees into staff meetings to encourage them to vote for the tax increase. An employee of any company would certainly feel intimidated and perhaps believe his or her job is on the line if he or she didn’t toe the company line on the tax hike.
Sam Williams, president and CEO of the Metro Atlanta Chamber, is leading the charge in this effort to squeeze employees into voting themselves a 10-year tax increase for a transportation plan. It is also a plan that is not cost-effective, one that is too focused on mass transit and will do little to ease congestion.
Williams told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that several member companies are working on turn-out-the-vote efforts, including hosting employee meetings to brief workers on the plan and offering time off to vote. The article goes on to say businesses are committed to turning out an extra 50,000 voters on July 31 when Georgians vote on the T-SPLOST referendum.
This reminds me of the tactics you see in states such as Wisconsin or Ohio, where unions used intimidation to repeal measures to keep the size of government in check.
Voters just don’t like to be told what to do, and they certainly don’t like a bully.
Apparently, the $8 million advertising campaign to push the sales tax increase may not persuade enough voters to tax themselves for another decade. Thus, we have a chamber and business community resorting to “suggest” to employees that they vote themselves a tax hike.
Georgia prides itself on being a right to work state, staving off efforts of organized unions for decades. Now, it seems a consortium of businesses with interests at stake want to be the unofficial union in Georgia. And just like any union, it will be at the expense of taxpayers.
Encouraging employees to vote in order to ensure a free society is a laudable exercise. Encouraging employees to vote in a certain way is an exercise in power. If you control a man’s livelihood, you have power over his will.
An issue that cannot succeed on its merit should fail. Employees should not fear reprisal if they choose to exercise their constitutional right by expressing an opinion contrary to the powers that be.
The power play displayed by the metro chamber is a violation of the principles of a free society. If a vote is sovereign, it must mean voters have the right to set the agenda, discuss the issues and then directly make the final decisions.
I will be voting “no” on the tax increase July 31 and encourage fellow Georgians to do the same.
Sadie Fields is the former chairwoman of the Christian Coalition of Georgia and Georgia Christian Alliance.
By John Brock
One of the most important lessons a region, its leaders and businesses learn is that transportation is critical to prosperity. If goods and people can’t go, a city can’t grow.
That has always been true for Atlanta, which was actually founded on transportation. It was a railroad hub that flourished and became the booming capital of the New South, thanks to city leaders with the foresight to build an international airport and to capitalize on the federal interstate system.
Our fabulous transportation system made Atlanta the envy of others, and it paid off: Major companies such as UPS, Newell Rubbermaid and NCR moved their headquarters here.
Our status as a transportation hub was the magnet for companies such as Caterpillar, AGCO and Kia Motors.
Time is money, and that’s never been truer than in today’s 24/7 world. The executives who relocated here, bringing thousands of jobs and adding to our tax base, needed to be able to move quickly to capitalize on business opportunities — whether it was around town, around the country or around the world.
From a Coca-Cola Enterprises and a Coca-Cola system standpoint, it is critically important for us to have a transportation system that allows employees to get to and from their homes and offices efficiently.
And today, they cannot. Just as important, it is key that trucks carrying Coca-Cola products get these products to and from stores in an efficient system.
Unfortunately, what once built us up now holds us back: Transportation has become a detriment to Atlanta’s success. I frequently hear, “We would love to move our company to Atlanta, but the traffic …”
Traffic has become a bad joke — on us.
Consider these depressing numbers from the 2010 Texas Transportation Institute Annual Urban Mobility Report:
The average metro Atlantan spends 43 hours a year stuck in traffic — that’s five work days.
Atlanta’s daily peak period travel time is the worst in the nation at 127 minutes.
Atlanta’s total cost of traffic congestion is nearly $2.4 billion annually. That’s money lost.
The regional transportation referendum gives us the opportunity to turn those numbers around, to make sure that Atlanta continues to thrive. Your “yes” vote July 31 will notify business leaders across the nation that Atlanta is serious about resolving its traffic woes, and that we are taking important steps to remain attractive to commerce.
This regional funding mechanism, which expires in 10 years, will allow us to invest $8.5 billion in 157 projects that will enhance transportation in our 10-county metro area, improvements that will save us thousands of hours and billions of dollars while building metro Atlanta’s income and tax base.
When you vote, I urge you vote “yes.” Follow the lead of Atlanta’s far-sighted leaders who, decades ago, innately understood that transportation is crucial to the prosperity of our region.
John Brock is chairman and CEO of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.
80 comments Add your comment
Dave
July 10th, 2012
6:01 pm
Oh hell, I’m on Sadie Fields’ side and I early voted.
Bryan -- MARTA supporter
July 10th, 2012
5:59 pm
@ Chris Sanchez
It is written into law that the tax can’t go on more than 10 years where the Ga 400 toll didn’t have that law.
And what is not defined? There are over 150 projects that are in complete detail of what it will fix, how long, and how much it will cost.
And the reason we have as much traffic is because there aren’t many alternatives to drive in those counties. I mean you have Xpress, which clearly shows there is a need for transit in the ‘burbs. Having local and express bus/rail into the city is what is needed because now the only option are the interstates. Once in the city we need an extensive network of buses and trains and streetcars to move people around. That’s how every major city is set up. Atlanta is a major city!
Bryan -- MARTA supporter
July 10th, 2012
5:36 pm
@ allen981
Your carbon argument acutually could be true (I laugh when I type this):
“But you can come up with examples in which driving a car looks better. A train produces more emissions per trip than any car, bus, or truck; it makes up for that fact environmentally because it carries a lot more people. It stands to reason, then, that if you ride in a full sedan on a day when the train is pretty empty—and, in particular, if you are in a fuel-efficient car—the car could conceivably be greener per passenger mile. (The study says a car would need to have about three passengers—double the average—to break even environmentally with the typical train.)”
Basically everyone would need to ride around in hybrid or electric cars, with 3 to 4 people in them, AND the trains would have to basically run empty all day long, just to break even with carbon emissions of a train and the number of people that are moved with this option. Now really, in a sprawling city like Atlanta and it’s burbs is that really going to happen? And the winner is RAIL!
Joe_Harris
July 10th, 2012
5:15 pm
We definitely have to do more to improve our transportation infrastructure. It was not built to handle the volume that it currently has, as seen by all the road improvement projects that are continuously in the works. We need a plan that will integrate rail and road improvement projects the best way possible. The transportation referendum is the best way to go out improving the traffic problems that we currently have.
Xavier
July 10th, 2012
5:01 pm
Sorry, but past (in)actions have future consequences. The powers that be have done f***-all with the money they have taken over the years, and I have no faith they will do what they’re promising with this special sales tax. Chalk up one more no vote.
Be good stewards with what you have been given, and maybe then you’ll get more. But not until then.
allen981
July 10th, 2012
4:45 pm
A ‘no’ vote means that localities will have to find ways to create their own solutions, and that we can address the existing issues in a more responsible, open way. This referendum is as much about how the T-SPLOST came to be as it is the projects themselves.
Most importantly, there is nothing in this referendum that is truly forward looking and innovative. Trains/streetcars are not innovation, they are and admission of failure to find new, high tech solutions to our problems.
Lastly, a vote ‘no’ frees all of us from a decades-long commitment to bad planning. While many individual projects are wise and necessary, the T-SPLOST is not the right approach to create them. As a result, the T-SPLOST is not the right approach for our future, and a ‘no’ vote reflects that.
Tax the Churches & Religious Organization
July 10th, 2012
4:41 pm
Well, I can tell you one untapped source of revenue – churches and religious affiliated organizations who are violating their tax-exempt status by advocating for specific positions on policy. I wish the IRS would get off their duffs and start penalizing these blatant violators!
Transportation Supporter
July 10th, 2012
3:18 pm
Skeptical, thanks for the good discussion btw. It’s make or break because if it doesn’t pass, I think the likelihood of another vote is pretty much gone. It’s impossible to find a project list that will satisfy all 5+ million of us, so if we can’t rally behind this vote now then the future does not look good for a metro already suffering from severe congestion. A “No” vote for this effectively says “we are not willing to do anything to fix our problems”. Not a good recipe for success.
Transportation Supporter
July 10th, 2012
3:11 pm
Bud, do you only drive in Henry county or are there more counties you drive through in Atlanta? US 19/41 widening is a good one, so is the Atlanta to Griffin commuter rail study. Henry is projected to contribute less than 4% to the total over 10 years so that’s why the county is getting less than others.
massachusetss refugee
July 10th, 2012
3:07 pm
i work for ko, and i vote no. what “intimidation”?