We’re three weeks away from voting on a 1-cent sales tax to fund $8.5 million in transportation improvements in metro Atlanta. (Early voting is open now.) A conservative leader writes that Atlanta companies are intimidating their employees to vote ‘yes’ on July 31 and tax themselves. A Coke executive says better transit and roadways will help workers save time and keep local businesses humming.
Tom Sabulis is today’s moderator. Commenting is open following John Brock’s column below.
By Sadie Fields
Voter intimidation is wrong no matter who does it.
Voter intimidation can be as extreme as when members of the New Black Panther Party stood out front of a polling place in Philadelphia on Election Day 2008 wearing paramilitary garb, with one carrying a nightstick.
In our own backyard, voter intimidation is taking a more subtle approach as exhibited by the Metro Atlanta Chamber regarding the upcoming T-SPLOST vote. The business community is calling employees into staff meetings to encourage them to vote for the tax increase. An employee of any company would certainly feel intimidated and perhaps believe his or her job is on the line if he or she didn’t toe the company line on the tax hike.
Sam Williams, president and CEO of the Metro Atlanta Chamber, is leading the charge in this effort to squeeze employees into voting themselves a 10-year tax increase for a transportation plan. It is also a plan that is not cost-effective, one that is too focused on mass transit and will do little to ease congestion.
Williams told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that several member companies are working on turn-out-the-vote efforts, including hosting employee meetings to brief workers on the plan and offering time off to vote. The article goes on to say businesses are committed to turning out an extra 50,000 voters on July 31 when Georgians vote on the T-SPLOST referendum.
This reminds me of the tactics you see in states such as Wisconsin or Ohio, where unions used intimidation to repeal measures to keep the size of government in check.
Voters just don’t like to be told what to do, and they certainly don’t like a bully.
Apparently, the $8 million advertising campaign to push the sales tax increase may not persuade enough voters to tax themselves for another decade. Thus, we have a chamber and business community resorting to “suggest” to employees that they vote themselves a tax hike.
Georgia prides itself on being a right to work state, staving off efforts of organized unions for decades. Now, it seems a consortium of businesses with interests at stake want to be the unofficial union in Georgia. And just like any union, it will be at the expense of taxpayers.
Encouraging employees to vote in order to ensure a free society is a laudable exercise. Encouraging employees to vote in a certain way is an exercise in power. If you control a man’s livelihood, you have power over his will.
An issue that cannot succeed on its merit should fail. Employees should not fear reprisal if they choose to exercise their constitutional right by expressing an opinion contrary to the powers that be.
The power play displayed by the metro chamber is a violation of the principles of a free society. If a vote is sovereign, it must mean voters have the right to set the agenda, discuss the issues and then directly make the final decisions.
I will be voting “no” on the tax increase July 31 and encourage fellow Georgians to do the same.
Sadie Fields is the former chairwoman of the Christian Coalition of Georgia and Georgia Christian Alliance.
By John Brock
One of the most important lessons a region, its leaders and businesses learn is that transportation is critical to prosperity. If goods and people can’t go, a city can’t grow.
That has always been true for Atlanta, which was actually founded on transportation. It was a railroad hub that flourished and became the booming capital of the New South, thanks to city leaders with the foresight to build an international airport and to capitalize on the federal interstate system.
Our fabulous transportation system made Atlanta the envy of others, and it paid off: Major companies such as UPS, Newell Rubbermaid and NCR moved their headquarters here.
Our status as a transportation hub was the magnet for companies such as Caterpillar, AGCO and Kia Motors.
Time is money, and that’s never been truer than in today’s 24/7 world. The executives who relocated here, bringing thousands of jobs and adding to our tax base, needed to be able to move quickly to capitalize on business opportunities — whether it was around town, around the country or around the world.
From a Coca-Cola Enterprises and a Coca-Cola system standpoint, it is critically important for us to have a transportation system that allows employees to get to and from their homes and offices efficiently.
And today, they cannot. Just as important, it is key that trucks carrying Coca-Cola products get these products to and from stores in an efficient system.
Unfortunately, what once built us up now holds us back: Transportation has become a detriment to Atlanta’s success. I frequently hear, “We would love to move our company to Atlanta, but the traffic …”
Traffic has become a bad joke — on us.
Consider these depressing numbers from the 2010 Texas Transportation Institute Annual Urban Mobility Report:
The average metro Atlantan spends 43 hours a year stuck in traffic — that’s five work days.
Atlanta’s daily peak period travel time is the worst in the nation at 127 minutes.
Atlanta’s total cost of traffic congestion is nearly $2.4 billion annually. That’s money lost.
The regional transportation referendum gives us the opportunity to turn those numbers around, to make sure that Atlanta continues to thrive. Your “yes” vote July 31 will notify business leaders across the nation that Atlanta is serious about resolving its traffic woes, and that we are taking important steps to remain attractive to commerce.
This regional funding mechanism, which expires in 10 years, will allow us to invest $8.5 billion in 157 projects that will enhance transportation in our 10-county metro area, improvements that will save us thousands of hours and billions of dollars while building metro Atlanta’s income and tax base.
When you vote, I urge you vote “yes.” Follow the lead of Atlanta’s far-sighted leaders who, decades ago, innately understood that transportation is crucial to the prosperity of our region.
John Brock is chairman and CEO of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.
80 comments Add your comment
Transportation Supporter
July 10th, 2012
3:02 pm
I wish opponents to this would see the “do nothing” alternative is worse for the region than what’s being put forth in this referendum. I always want to ask, should we just continue down the path we’re on and settle for the bad traffic we already have? All it takes to see how bad it’s gotten is to go out of town for a few days and you’ll see it when you come back. We need to catch back up and get traffic under control so that our region can continue to have the success we’ve had the last 20 years.
Skeptical
July 10th, 2012
2:54 pm
I will probably vote yes, but why is this a make or break deal? Why can’t they revise the project list and bring it up for vote again in November?
Bud
July 10th, 2012
2:48 pm
I live in Henry County, and can’t see how I will even remotely be helped by paying extra money. It appears that Gwinnett, Cobb, and North Fulton counties are getting the lion’s share of the money, and those of us who are residents of the southside get a pitiful bone thrown our way. I’m voting no.
Skeptical
July 10th, 2012
2:23 pm
@ Supporter
#1) So, 10 years vs. 14 years??
#2) I am aware, but that just means the legislation needs to change, not diverting additional tax revenue to it.
#3) The ARC already has a plan through 2040. The arguement for continuing the tax will be the unfinished projects rail projects.
Also, why is the ‘Gultch’ project not priority #1? Seems a intermodal terminal is the starting point that would initially benifit all counties involved since most have a regional bus system.
Transportation Supporter
July 10th, 2012
2:02 pm
Skeptical,
1) The GA 400 toll money is already being used for other projects (have you seen the new ramps from 400 south to 85 north?). And at $59,000 per day average weekday toll revenue, it’s a drop in the bucket compared to the cost of a large scale project such as the 285/400 interchange improvement. To even come close to the amount guaranteed by the referendum, you would have to take all the GA 400 toll revenue from every weekday for 14 years.
2) Are you aware that MARTA is mandated by law to spend half of it’s sales tax revenue on capital expenditures and the other half on operations? As a result, the agency has been struggling to pay for bus a rail operations and is unable to shift money from capital to operational spending. The governance of MARTA was written into law in the 70’s when transit construction and operation was much less expensive and it really needs to be updated.
3) The tax can only be levied for 10 years.
smottlicher
July 10th, 2012
2:01 pm
The Tsplost is guaranteed to end…it is written in to the law. This is in no way like the SR 400 tolls that were administered and renewed by the SRTA boardmembers. The Tsplost can not be automatically renewed without another vote. Read the law folks.
Now the Region authorities may put up a second Tsplost in 10 years for a vote, but just like now there would be plenty of discussion and a vote before the sales tax could be renewed. (so so tired of this worn out and incorrect talking point)
Where's the Rail?
July 10th, 2012
1:45 pm
Oh the irony in the Christian Coalition being upset over voter intimidation. Let’s re-read her response another way, keeping in mind that the Christian Coalition hands out pamphlets to churches every election on how “good Christians” should vote:
Encouraging Christians to vote in order to ensure a free society is a laudable exercise.
Encouraging Christians to vote in a certain way is an exercise in power. If you control a man’s livelihood, you have power over his will.
Skeptical
July 10th, 2012
1:38 pm
Look at the project list
#1) $200+ million going to Ga 400 improvements – why is this not covered with the never ending toll money?
#2) $300+ million in marta rehabilitaion projects – such as escalators – sorry, but marta needs to learn how to sustain itself.
#3) The $700 emory line is not even close to an accurate number – expect twice that amount over 15+ years.
Matthew
July 10th, 2012
1:06 pm
The problem will be with general distrust of state and local governments, especially when the proposal involves a large amount of taxpayer money and is centered around Atlanta. When people think optional tax, they think moronic ideas like streetcars on Auburn Avenue.
In a metro area that has failed for decades to wisely fix infrastructure, can you really be surprised if people reject this proposal?
Transportation Supporter
July 10th, 2012
12:14 pm
Chris,
The referendum is for a law that a 1-cent sales tax will levied for 10 years in counties within the region. Saying that it will be extended by politicians is like saying they can just create a new tax without us voting for it.
Also, tell me how widening SR 140 in Cherokee & Fulton, realigning SR 92 in Douglas, widening SR 120 in Johns Creek, widening SR 141 from PIB to the Chatthoochee, SR 400 @ Holcomb Bridge interchange improvements, 285 @ 400 interchange improvements, etc. will not improve congestion. Are you familiar with any of these corridors? Do you know how bad traffic is on all of these today? There is no telling when these corridors will be improved without the passage of this referendum.