T-SPLOST voter intimidation?

Big business moving workers

We’re three weeks away from voting on a 1-cent sales tax to fund $8.5 million in transportation improvements in metro Atlanta. (Early voting is open now.) A conservative leader writes that Atlanta companies are intimidating their employees to vote ‘yes’ on July 31 and tax themselves. A Coke executive says better transit and roadways will help workers save time and keep local businesses humming.

Tom Sabulis is today’s moderator. Commenting is open following John Brock’s column below.

By Sadie Fields

Voter intimidation is wrong no matter who does it.

Voter intimidation can be as extreme as when members of the New Black Panther Party stood out front of a polling place in Philadelphia on Election Day 2008 wearing paramilitary garb, with one carrying a nightstick.

In our own backyard, voter intimidation is taking a more subtle approach as exhibited by the Metro Atlanta Chamber regarding the upcoming T-SPLOST vote. The business community is calling employees into staff meetings to encourage them to vote for the tax increase. An employee of any company would certainly feel intimidated and perhaps believe his or her job is on the line if he or she didn’t toe the company line on the tax hike.

Sam Williams, president and CEO of the Metro Atlanta Chamber, is leading the charge in this effort to squeeze employees into voting themselves a 10-year tax increase for a transportation plan. It is also a plan that is not cost-effective, one that is too focused on mass transit and will do little to ease congestion.

Williams told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that several member companies are working on turn-out-the-vote efforts, including hosting employee meetings to brief workers on the plan and offering time off to vote. The article goes on to say businesses are committed to turning out an extra 50,000 voters on July 31 when Georgians vote on the T-SPLOST referendum.

This reminds me of the tactics you see in states such as Wisconsin or Ohio, where unions used intimidation to repeal measures to keep the size of government in check.

Voters just don’t like to be told what to do, and they certainly don’t like a bully.

Apparently, the $8 million advertising campaign to push the sales tax increase may not persuade enough voters to tax themselves for another decade. Thus, we have a chamber and business community resorting to “suggest” to employees that they vote themselves a tax hike.

Georgia prides itself on being a right to work state, staving off efforts of organized unions for decades. Now, it seems a consortium of businesses with interests at stake want to be the unofficial union in Georgia. And just like any union, it will be at the expense of taxpayers.

Encouraging employees to vote in order to ensure a free society is a laudable exercise. Encouraging employees to vote in a certain way is an exercise in power. If you control a man’s livelihood, you have power over his will.

An issue that cannot succeed on its merit should fail. Employees should not fear reprisal if they choose to exercise their constitutional right by expressing an opinion contrary to the powers that be.

The power play displayed by the metro chamber is a violation of the prin­ciples of a free society. If a vote is sovereign, it must mean voters have the right to set the agenda, discuss the issues and then directly make the final decisions.

I will be voting “no” on the tax increase July 31 and encourage fellow Georgians to do the same.

Sadie Fields is the former chairwoman of the Christian Coalition of Georgia and Georgia Christian Alliance.

By John Brock

One of the most important lessons a region, its leaders and businesses learn is that transportation is critical to prosperity. If goods and people can’t go, a city can’t grow.

That has always been true for Atlanta, which was actually founded on transportation. It was a railroad hub that flourished and became the booming capital of the New South, thanks to city leaders with the foresight to build an international airport and to capitalize on the federal interstate system.

Our fabulous transportation system made Atlanta the envy of others, and it paid off: Major companies such as UPS, Newell Rubbermaid and NCR moved their headquarters here.

Our status as a transportation hub was the magnet for companies such as Caterpillar, AGCO and Kia Motors.

Time is money, and that’s never been truer than in today’s 24/7 world. The executives who relocated here, bringing thousands of jobs and adding to our tax base, needed to be able to move quickly to capitalize on business opportunities — whether it was around town, around the country or around the world.

From a Coca-Cola Enterprises and a Coca-Cola system standpoint, it is critically important for us to have a transportation system that allows employees to get to and from their homes and offices efficiently.

And today, they cannot. Just as important, it is key that trucks carrying Coca-Cola products get these products to and from stores in an efficient system.

Unfortunately, what once built us up now holds us back: Transportation has become a detriment to Atlanta’s success. I frequently hear, “We would love to move our company to Atlanta, but the traffic …”

Traffic has become a bad joke — on us.

Consider these depressing numbers from the 2010 Texas Transportation Institute Annual Urban Mobility Report:

The average metro Atlantan spends 43 hours a year stuck in traffic — that’s five work days.

Atlanta’s daily peak period travel time is the worst in the nation at 127 minutes.

Atlanta’s total cost of traffic congestion is nearly $2.4 billion annually. That’s money lost.

The regional transportation referendum gives us the opportunity to turn those numbers around, to make sure that Atlanta continues to thrive. Your “yes” vote July 31 will notify business leaders across the nation that Atlanta is serious about resolving its traffic woes, and that we are taking important steps to remain attractive to commerce.

This regional funding mechanism, which expires in 10 years, will allow us to invest $8.5 billion in 157 projects that will enhance transportation in our 10-county metro area, improvements that will save us thousands of hours and billions of dollars while building metro Atlanta’s income and tax base.

When you vote, I urge you vote “yes.” Follow the lead of Atlanta’s far-sighted leaders who, decades ago, innately understood that transportation is crucial to the prosperity of our region.

John Brock is chairman and CEO of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.

80 comments Add your comment

Chris Sanchez

July 10th, 2012
12:05 pm

@Red: we differ on some of this but both agree that there are problems with the poorly defined project list and the lack of trust in GA politicians!

Red

July 10th, 2012
12:00 pm

I’m still not sure how I’m going to vote, but unless an employer was in the booth with you, how would they know? Sadie Fields is a crackpot. She’s spews fear and deception. If employers are supporting the T-SPLOST, it’s because they understand that the threat of businesses turning away from Georgia is very real. What Ms. Fields doesn’t seem to get is how things won’t get better if a Regional Transportation solution isn’t found. My biggest complain over the years is that Dekalb and Fulton citizens shouldn’t be the only one who support this region in finding a transportation solution. Other counties reap the benefits and they should also pay into fixing the problems. There are plenty of places that are hurting and willing to invest in Transit and Quality of Life. If I were leading the search for a company I would choose a place that has a good transportation/transit infrastruction, not gripping deadlock traffic and a Transit system that is bound by rules that don’t support growth. Like I said, I’m still not sure if I’m voting for it. I’d like to know why there is no Rail out I-20 East? Why only in Northern burbs benefitting, not on the South side? I’m also skeptical of Georgia politicians who constantly lie (i.e: GA 400 tolls will go away after it’s paid for) and mis-manage funds. Why can’t we have trasparency and disclosure of the contract process? If I knew that even 50% of the the funds would help ease traffic (not beautify a rail corridor and help intown property values), I would be more likely to support it.

Chris Sanchez

July 10th, 2012
11:47 am

@reaganite: You will have a lot more credibility when you use your name.

@Bryan — MARTA supporter: I am not in favor of making perfect the enemy of good. The problem is the current plan is poorly defined and will not reduce traffic congestion. Further, once in place, the politicians will not allow it to expire. There will never be enough money for all of the “projects” politicians will come up with. As for public transit, let those who live in those cities/counties with public transit pay for it. Why in the world should people in Douglas or Cherokee Counties pay for MARTA? Fulton & Dekalb should pay for MARTA. If GA State government believes is it important to fund then put it in the state’s budget. I wonder if the people in Augusta or Savannah will support those state legislators for re-election if they do?

I have read the list of projects (the ones that have been proposed anyway) and do not believe those projects will reduce congestion. I can support paying for clearly defined projects to improve traffic in our region as I believe most reasonable people can. This TSPLOST proposal, as it currently exists, it not that!

Transportation Supporter

July 10th, 2012
11:38 am

Allen,

1-If it can be proven then prove it. Post a link to a study proving it. I genuinely would like to know.

2-The unfortunate reality is the gas tax no longer provides adequate funding for major roadway construction projects. There’s a number of reasons for this. The gas tax is levied (for the most part) per gallon, not per dollar so it hasn’t risen with inflation. Construction and material costs have risen while tax revenue has been relatively flat. Also fuel efficiency, while great for our pocketbooks, has created a trend of more miles driven (i.e. more wear and tear on roads) per tax dollar paid. Electric cars pay no gas tax.

3-Transit funding (which I agree is not the greatest) will continue to be from counties that choose to opt-in (DeKalb and Fulton). If you don’t want to support it fine, then don’t live or shop in those counties.

And actually, this campaign was not poorly planned or executed. In fact it’s the result of several years of convincing the state legislature to budge a little and give up some local control. And the accountability of this referendum is much more solid than the gas tax considering it’s a 1-cent sales tax tied to a specifically defined project list that is bound by law and cannot be renewed without another referendum. To me, this looks much more clear cut than a statewide tax that pays for what again?

joeleejohnson

July 10th, 2012
11:24 am

Appears, from the by-lines’; The Christians are being mauled by the Lions–Again. Except in this 21st century arena, the game is rigged even more in favor of the Lions.

JohnsonFloyd

July 10th, 2012
11:19 am

Voter intimidation! You do not know voter intimidaton until you have experienced your Union telling you how to vote. And what about the uneasy feelings you get when the minister in your church tells its congregation how to vote or you will be going straight to hell. (and all along the Union Bosses as well as the Preacher is receiving cash and favors under the table)

allen981

July 10th, 2012
11:18 am

Good job, TransSupporter. However, yes, it can be proven that rail uses more carbon and has a detrimental environmental impact.

And, two, we didn’t have a SPLOST to build any other road in Atlanta or Georgia. We had leaders who made a commitment and kept to it.

And three, where is the long term funding for the rail projects going to come from? It won’t come from passenger receipts; no train in the world (look it up) operates without subsidy. None.

This entire campaign is a poorly planned, poorly executed attempt to create billions in additional tax dollars with very little accountability for their use. That’s the sad bottom line.

Transportation Supporter

July 10th, 2012
11:00 am

Allen, here are my responses:

To those who say, “if not this, what?” here is an answer:

First, build the long-scrapped outer perimeter. It will create tremendous relief for I-285 and all other existing highways,

Response: With what money? This project is unfeasible with GDOT’s current funding structure.

Second, recognize that the costs of rail – any new rail – are unacceptably high in terms of both dollars and environmental impact. Rail using more resources, not less, moves fewer people at higher cost.

Response: What is the cost of time lost to delay caused by traffic congestion? You may not like rail but it benefits all users by taking cars off the road. How is a 40′ wide railway more of an environmental impact than a 250′ wide interstate? Also, can you prove the electricity used by trains impacts the environment more than all the fuel used to keep cars/trucks/buses running?

Third, get serious about insisting on telecommuting. Most office workers today can perform very acceptably working from home. This keeps cars off the road, improves productivity, and improves the quality of life for employees. Even two days a week is a major help.

Response: Do you realize how much people telecommute already? And what about people that must physically be at their jobs? Maybe we should grow up and realize that the existing transportation system does not have enough carrying capacity for the current population.

Fourth, redefine our future and accept that Atlanta’s size and scope is more than sufficient for the long term. We do not have to have ongoing massive growth; let’s keep the size of this city in check to match the resources we have.

Response: When you get down to it, this referendum is really more about addressing critical needs, not about developmental growth. Atlanta’s size and scope may be more than sufficient for the long term, but it’s transportation system isn’t. When you have the chronic traffic congestion that is so common around the metro, it means that current infrastructure is failing to provide service to today’s traffic. And if Atlanta continues to grow, service levels will only get worse.

Just some common sense, which is in short supply for those that support the T-SPLOST and its reliance on 19th century technology to solve 21st century problems.

Bob Loblaw

July 10th, 2012
10:47 am

Sadie! Where was this outrage against intimidation against ob/gyns participating in civil discourse at the state capitol?

Matthew

July 10th, 2012
10:40 am

Will this build rail to Turner Field? No?

I’m out.