T-SPLOST voter intimidation?

Big business moving workers

We’re three weeks away from voting on a 1-cent sales tax to fund $8.5 million in transportation improvements in metro Atlanta. (Early voting is open now.) A conservative leader writes that Atlanta companies are intimidating their employees to vote ‘yes’ on July 31 and tax themselves. A Coke executive says better transit and roadways will help workers save time and keep local businesses humming.

Tom Sabulis is today’s moderator. Commenting is open following John Brock’s column below.

By Sadie Fields

Voter intimidation is wrong no matter who does it.

Voter intimidation can be as extreme as when members of the New Black Panther Party stood out front of a polling place in Philadelphia on Election Day 2008 wearing paramilitary garb, with one carrying a nightstick.

In our own backyard, voter intimidation is taking a more subtle approach as exhibited by the Metro Atlanta Chamber regarding the upcoming T-SPLOST vote. The business community is calling employees into staff meetings to encourage them to vote for the tax increase. An employee of any company would certainly feel intimidated and perhaps believe his or her job is on the line if he or she didn’t toe the company line on the tax hike.

Sam Williams, president and CEO of the Metro Atlanta Chamber, is leading the charge in this effort to squeeze employees into voting themselves a 10-year tax increase for a transportation plan. It is also a plan that is not cost-effective, one that is too focused on mass transit and will do little to ease congestion.

Williams told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that several member companies are working on turn-out-the-vote efforts, including hosting employee meetings to brief workers on the plan and offering time off to vote. The article goes on to say businesses are committed to turning out an extra 50,000 voters on July 31 when Georgians vote on the T-SPLOST referendum.

This reminds me of the tactics you see in states such as Wisconsin or Ohio, where unions used intimidation to repeal measures to keep the size of government in check.

Voters just don’t like to be told what to do, and they certainly don’t like a bully.

Apparently, the $8 million advertising campaign to push the sales tax increase may not persuade enough voters to tax themselves for another decade. Thus, we have a chamber and business community resorting to “suggest” to employees that they vote themselves a tax hike.

Georgia prides itself on being a right to work state, staving off efforts of organized unions for decades. Now, it seems a consortium of businesses with interests at stake want to be the unofficial union in Georgia. And just like any union, it will be at the expense of taxpayers.

Encouraging employees to vote in order to ensure a free society is a laudable exercise. Encouraging employees to vote in a certain way is an exercise in power. If you control a man’s livelihood, you have power over his will.

An issue that cannot succeed on its merit should fail. Employees should not fear reprisal if they choose to exercise their constitutional right by expressing an opinion contrary to the powers that be.

The power play displayed by the metro chamber is a violation of the prin­ciples of a free society. If a vote is sovereign, it must mean voters have the right to set the agenda, discuss the issues and then directly make the final decisions.

I will be voting “no” on the tax increase July 31 and encourage fellow Georgians to do the same.

Sadie Fields is the former chairwoman of the Christian Coalition of Georgia and Georgia Christian Alliance.

By John Brock

One of the most important lessons a region, its leaders and businesses learn is that transportation is critical to prosperity. If goods and people can’t go, a city can’t grow.

That has always been true for Atlanta, which was actually founded on transportation. It was a railroad hub that flourished and became the booming capital of the New South, thanks to city leaders with the foresight to build an international airport and to capitalize on the federal interstate system.

Our fabulous transportation system made Atlanta the envy of others, and it paid off: Major companies such as UPS, Newell Rubbermaid and NCR moved their headquarters here.

Our status as a transportation hub was the magnet for companies such as Caterpillar, AGCO and Kia Motors.

Time is money, and that’s never been truer than in today’s 24/7 world. The executives who relocated here, bringing thousands of jobs and adding to our tax base, needed to be able to move quickly to capitalize on business opportunities — whether it was around town, around the country or around the world.

From a Coca-Cola Enterprises and a Coca-Cola system standpoint, it is critically important for us to have a transportation system that allows employees to get to and from their homes and offices efficiently.

And today, they cannot. Just as important, it is key that trucks carrying Coca-Cola products get these products to and from stores in an efficient system.

Unfortunately, what once built us up now holds us back: Transportation has become a detriment to Atlanta’s success. I frequently hear, “We would love to move our company to Atlanta, but the traffic …”

Traffic has become a bad joke — on us.

Consider these depressing numbers from the 2010 Texas Transportation Institute Annual Urban Mobility Report:

The average metro Atlantan spends 43 hours a year stuck in traffic — that’s five work days.

Atlanta’s daily peak period travel time is the worst in the nation at 127 minutes.

Atlanta’s total cost of traffic congestion is nearly $2.4 billion annually. That’s money lost.

The regional transportation referendum gives us the opportunity to turn those numbers around, to make sure that Atlanta continues to thrive. Your “yes” vote July 31 will notify business leaders across the nation that Atlanta is serious about resolving its traffic woes, and that we are taking important steps to remain attractive to commerce.

This regional funding mechanism, which expires in 10 years, will allow us to invest $8.5 billion in 157 projects that will enhance transportation in our 10-county metro area, improvements that will save us thousands of hours and billions of dollars while building metro Atlanta’s income and tax base.

When you vote, I urge you vote “yes.” Follow the lead of Atlanta’s far-sighted leaders who, decades ago, innately understood that transportation is crucial to the prosperity of our region.

John Brock is chairman and CEO of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.

80 comments Add your comment

james

July 9th, 2012
8:28 pm

Vote no on T-splost… Who is their right mind
would vote for a 10 years tax on their own income??
To heck with the Coca Cola guy… I am a big fan
of Coke….

yuzeyurbrane

July 9th, 2012
8:28 pm

Bad move to have Sadie saying voter intimidation is bad. Sadie Fields! Give me a break.

surly jb

July 9th, 2012
8:18 pm

There is nothing progressive about voting to tax ourselves billions of $$, only to turn it over to incompetent, corrupt bureaucrats (ok, I’m only talking about Atlanta, DeKalb, and Fulton, that’s all) who wouldn’t know a painted centerline from a power rail. Shiny new Southern Metropolis is dead, folks, the PowerThugs killed the Golden Goose right after the Olympics.

nelson

July 9th, 2012
7:49 pm

If John says it, it must be true. What coke should do is find a moe efficient way to move their product. Depending on raising taxes to make them more efficient is the wrong way. I would consider having transfer sites or staging areas closely located to their retail outlets. I wish I was CEO. I would have everybody on the same page. Have my confidants at the Capital Club for long working lunches. I am becoming delusional, I am just a poor laborer at heart. I feel good, have my diet cola every day. i did not research T-Splost.

Thomas

July 9th, 2012
7:35 pm

Streetcars, Cobb’s air traffic control tower, the start of a Northern Arc which will destroy Georgia’s best fishing, hunting, camping, water streams. Nothing changes: “Stupid is, as stupid does”.

Pigs at the public trough.

Andy Rooney

July 9th, 2012
7:23 pm

Has anyone actually checked the list of projects? Can someone explain how projects like a new control tower for McCollum Airport (2,500,000 USD) and a new runway approach lighting system for McCollum Airport (690,000 USD) contribute to a shorter drive in the Atlanta metropolis? Sales Tax boondoggles galore !!!

Aquagirl

July 9th, 2012
5:45 pm

Who dredged up Sadie Fields to comment on this? Was everyone else in the Rolodex on vacation? Is she afraid the T-SPLOST will turn our kids gay?

A paranoid foray into “it’s like the scary unions!” is mildly entertaining but apropos of nothing.

View From Midtown

July 9th, 2012
5:42 pm

Ol’ Shady Sadie is back? Well, Glory be! Of course Sadie doesn’t like for businesses to educate their employees, she thinks the only organization that should dictate how people vote is the church. You don’t need any messy facts or figures, just read the bible or better yet, don’t read at all and just do what your preacher tells you. Praise the Lord and vote Republican!!

And Steve1255, no Cobb tax dollars will be going towards the Beltline/Midtown Streetcar project; the project cost is well under what the City of Atlanta will contribute to the collections from the TIA sales tax. Only in your super-sized suburban imagination is Cobb County the center of the universe, much less the center of the region. The fact is that the mechanism for creating the project list and the balkanized nature of the region with its multitude of jurisdictions insured that each county would get roughly the same project value as their tax contribution since greedy, small-minded politicians driven by greedy, small-minded constituents wanted to make sure no other jurisdiction got a net-positive benefit from the TIA. This also insured that there were almost no Big-Bang projects; just lots of smaller project (and more studies than desirable). That being said, approving a non-optimal project list is still better than voting it down.

Defeating TIA will be worse than doing nothing; worse than if the legislature had never given this option to the public. Worse because a defeat would be used by cities/states across the country when competing for companies to say, “not only do they have huge problems, but when given a chance to do something about the problems, they chose to DO NOTHING.” It will set back economic development in the metro area and the state for a decade.

SAWB

July 9th, 2012
5:42 pm

ga values said, “Wouldn’t it be great if the $600,000,000.00 wasted on the beltline would be used to reduce congestion rather than to line the pockets of Reed’s corrupt cronies?”

Actually it went for birthday cake…

SAWB

July 9th, 2012
5:40 pm

Everyone has a right to express their opinion and just because you own or run a company does not negate that right. If you disagree with your employer simply vote the other way. The folks crying about intimidation are simply using this to influence people to vote no. It is just like the folks who are trying to scare you into believe every job will leave the region if we vote the other way. All just scare tactics.

This is a very difficult issue, so educate yourself the best you can and then vote based on your view not someone else’s.