T-SPLOST voter intimidation?

Big business moving workers

We’re three weeks away from voting on a 1-cent sales tax to fund $8.5 million in transportation improvements in metro Atlanta. (Early voting is open now.) A conservative leader writes that Atlanta companies are intimidating their employees to vote ‘yes’ on July 31 and tax themselves. A Coke executive says better transit and roadways will help workers save time and keep local businesses humming.

Tom Sabulis is today’s moderator. Commenting is open following John Brock’s column below.

By Sadie Fields

Voter intimidation is wrong no matter who does it.

Voter intimidation can be as extreme as when members of the New Black Panther Party stood out front of a polling place in Philadelphia on Election Day 2008 wearing paramilitary garb, with one carrying a nightstick.

In our own backyard, voter intimidation is taking a more subtle approach as exhibited by the Metro Atlanta Chamber regarding the upcoming T-SPLOST vote. The business community is calling employees into staff meetings to encourage them to vote for the tax increase. An employee of any company would certainly feel intimidated and perhaps believe his or her job is on the line if he or she didn’t toe the company line on the tax hike.

Sam Williams, president and CEO of the Metro Atlanta Chamber, is leading the charge in this effort to squeeze employees into voting themselves a 10-year tax increase for a transportation plan. It is also a plan that is not cost-effective, one that is too focused on mass transit and will do little to ease congestion.

Williams told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that several member companies are working on turn-out-the-vote efforts, including hosting employee meetings to brief workers on the plan and offering time off to vote. The article goes on to say businesses are committed to turning out an extra 50,000 voters on July 31 when Georgians vote on the T-SPLOST referendum.

This reminds me of the tactics you see in states such as Wisconsin or Ohio, where unions used intimidation to repeal measures to keep the size of government in check.

Voters just don’t like to be told what to do, and they certainly don’t like a bully.

Apparently, the $8 million advertising campaign to push the sales tax increase may not persuade enough voters to tax themselves for another decade. Thus, we have a chamber and business community resorting to “suggest” to employees that they vote themselves a tax hike.

Georgia prides itself on being a right to work state, staving off efforts of organized unions for decades. Now, it seems a consortium of businesses with interests at stake want to be the unofficial union in Georgia. And just like any union, it will be at the expense of taxpayers.

Encouraging employees to vote in order to ensure a free society is a laudable exercise. Encouraging employees to vote in a certain way is an exercise in power. If you control a man’s livelihood, you have power over his will.

An issue that cannot succeed on its merit should fail. Employees should not fear reprisal if they choose to exercise their constitutional right by expressing an opinion contrary to the powers that be.

The power play displayed by the metro chamber is a violation of the prin­ciples of a free society. If a vote is sovereign, it must mean voters have the right to set the agenda, discuss the issues and then directly make the final decisions.

I will be voting “no” on the tax increase July 31 and encourage fellow Georgians to do the same.

Sadie Fields is the former chairwoman of the Christian Coalition of Georgia and Georgia Christian Alliance.

By John Brock

One of the most important lessons a region, its leaders and businesses learn is that transportation is critical to prosperity. If goods and people can’t go, a city can’t grow.

That has always been true for Atlanta, which was actually founded on transportation. It was a railroad hub that flourished and became the booming capital of the New South, thanks to city leaders with the foresight to build an international airport and to capitalize on the federal interstate system.

Our fabulous transportation system made Atlanta the envy of others, and it paid off: Major companies such as UPS, Newell Rubbermaid and NCR moved their headquarters here.

Our status as a transportation hub was the magnet for companies such as Caterpillar, AGCO and Kia Motors.

Time is money, and that’s never been truer than in today’s 24/7 world. The executives who relocated here, bringing thousands of jobs and adding to our tax base, needed to be able to move quickly to capitalize on business opportunities — whether it was around town, around the country or around the world.

From a Coca-Cola Enterprises and a Coca-Cola system standpoint, it is critically important for us to have a transportation system that allows employees to get to and from their homes and offices efficiently.

And today, they cannot. Just as important, it is key that trucks carrying Coca-Cola products get these products to and from stores in an efficient system.

Unfortunately, what once built us up now holds us back: Transportation has become a detriment to Atlanta’s success. I frequently hear, “We would love to move our company to Atlanta, but the traffic …”

Traffic has become a bad joke — on us.

Consider these depressing numbers from the 2010 Texas Transportation Institute Annual Urban Mobility Report:

The average metro Atlantan spends 43 hours a year stuck in traffic — that’s five work days.

Atlanta’s daily peak period travel time is the worst in the nation at 127 minutes.

Atlanta’s total cost of traffic congestion is nearly $2.4 billion annually. That’s money lost.

The regional transportation referendum gives us the opportunity to turn those numbers around, to make sure that Atlanta continues to thrive. Your “yes” vote July 31 will notify business leaders across the nation that Atlanta is serious about resolving its traffic woes, and that we are taking important steps to remain attractive to commerce.

This regional funding mechanism, which expires in 10 years, will allow us to invest $8.5 billion in 157 projects that will enhance transportation in our 10-county metro area, improvements that will save us thousands of hours and billions of dollars while building metro Atlanta’s income and tax base.

When you vote, I urge you vote “yes.” Follow the lead of Atlanta’s far-sighted leaders who, decades ago, innately understood that transportation is crucial to the prosperity of our region.

John Brock is chairman and CEO of Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.

80 comments Add your comment

rik warren

July 9th, 2012
5:23 pm

Will they follow you into the voting booth?

Chicken Little, Squawk, Squawk

And by the way its just one person talking to another, because “remember folks, corporations are people too”. The Mitten.

ga values

July 9th, 2012
5:20 pm

Wouldn’t it be great if the $600,000,000.00 wasted on the beltline would be used to reduce congestion rather than to line the pockets of Reed’s corrupt cronies?

Jae

July 9th, 2012
5:17 pm

Every boss I have ever had has introduced me to a some type of candidate he (my boss) was supporting and urged me to vote for the candidate. Every candidate goes to large businesses and has the boss introduces him/her to the employees.

Last time I checked, almost every organization has a cause. When the organization finds a candidate/referendum which supports that cause, that organization will pressure it’s members to vote that way.

When G.A.E. or P.A.G.E. endorses a candidate and urges their member to vote, should all of the state’s teachers feel intimidated? NO!!

When the N.R.A. urges it’s members to vote a certain way, should gun owners feel intimidated? NO!!

Red

July 9th, 2012
5:08 pm

This balanced discussion captures the essence of the debate. Reactionary, don’t change anything vs. progressive, change is inevitable. The question is, how will we choose to deal with change. Atlanta’s population growth has exceeded its transportation infrastructure. I’ve had a chance to live in 6 of the 10 most populated cities. The Atlanta region is a great place to live & work – except for the traffic. Having read about every one of the projects to be funded by this initiative, T-SPLOST will not solve Atlanta’s traffic mess. And some areas will benefit more than others. But to NOT provide the funding for these projects will result in total gridlock.

Steve1255

July 9th, 2012
5:04 pm

It appears to me that our elected officials are trying to sell us a bill of goods. Here in Cobb county we do not seem to be getting very much for the taxes we will have to pay. Tim Lee is in peril of losing his job and it would not surprise me to see him working for the Cobb Chamber of Commerce once he is voted out of office. In fact he has had two slip of the tongue references to that lately.
Why should my tax dollars go to Atlanta,specifically the Beltline that has nothing to do with this tax?
they are using fear and intimidation to force a yes vote. Do they think that this is Chicago?
Vote no! Then go back and revisit the issue without all of the politics and come up with a plan that will actually work.

MB

July 9th, 2012
4:55 pm

A plan that “is too focused on mass transit”?

Was that a joke?

Tammy

July 9th, 2012
4:53 pm

“An employee of any company would certainly feel intimidated and perhaps believe his or her job is on the line if he or she didn’t toe the company line on the tax hike.”
If you work in an office where you fear being fired for not supporting the TSPLOST, it is time to get a new job.

Darwin

July 9th, 2012
4:52 pm

How is it intimidation? A corporation, union, membership, club, etc is certainly entitled to educate their workers or members in understanding what’s at stake. It’s called a democracy. Something Sadie doesn’t know much about.

Eddiev

July 9th, 2012
4:52 pm

I’m not nearly as alarmed by companies pushing their employees to vote for a tax as Sadie Fields. What makes her think they’ll listen? Surveys show that many, many workers would like to leave their current jobs if they could. So I doubt they’ll be towing the company line.

And if they felt put upon, no one knows how a voter votes anyway.

johnny boy

July 9th, 2012
4:32 pm

It’s not a 1 cent sales tax, it’s a 1 percent sales tax. Big damn difference.